Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
The Singapore Rapid Transit System (RTS) comprises the North South, East West and North
East lines, linking seamlessly to Light Rail Systems, namely, Bukit Panjang, Sengkang and
Punggol LRTs. After the Circle Line Extension opened in Jan 2012, the total rail length in
Singapore has reached 178km. The transport sector is one of the major energy consumers
in Singapore. With increasing global energy demand, greater effort is thus required to
make effective use of energy. In addition, the Singapore RTS network will double by year
2020. Hence, it is crucial that every effort is made in the design of the RTS to improve
energy efficiency in order to achieve a sustainable land transport system. This paper
describes the various strategies adopted in the design of the Singapore RTS to reduce
energy demand during operations.
energy conservation benefits. Such measures In the Singapore context, the DC traction
have also resulted in reducing operating costs system (nominal voltage of 750VDC and
in the long run. 1500VDC) is adopted due to short interstation
distances. Transmission of traction power
Measures to improve energy efficiency require a along the track is achieved by means of a third
holistic approach as it spans multiple disciplines (conductor) rail laid close to the running rails or
and systems (for eg., mechanical and electrical via an overhead catenary line. The running rails
systems, rolling stock, civil design, etc.). To this serve as the return rails (negative rails) for the
end, LTA has instituted many design efforts traction network to the various traction power
in maximising energy efficiency and these substations located along the RTS. 600VAC
measures have been implemented across our systems with multiple conductor rails have also
RTS infrastructure. been utilised for Singapores LRT systems. The
traction network for the RTS is supplied via the
The following sections depict the major internal AC HV network through the use of
strategies adopted by LTA in the design of its RTS diode rectifier systems. As the train accelerates,
network to improve energy efficiency and make or during coasting mode, power is delivered to
the land transport system sustainable. The areas the train from the rectifiers via the third rail or
where these strategies are adopted include: the overhead catenary line.
In Singapore, inverters are installed in the for Building Services. Strict lighting power
RTS to recover the excess regenerative energy budgets are generally stipulated within the RTS
from the braking of trains. This excess energy for different functional areas, which ensure
is channelled back into the internal AC HV that energy efficient lighting is employed.
network, which is then utilised by the station
auxiliary loads. The inverter consists of double In the development of lighting
full wave thyristor bridge circuits which convert concept within a station, the
the DC supply into AC supply. importance of functional lighting
generally takes precedence over
Computer simulations are performed to other aesthetic requirements.
determine the optimum location of the
inverters (highest global energy recovered as In general, direct lighting through the use
compared to the number of units of inverter of more energy efficient lighting source
installed). Based on actual operation figures, is preferred over indirect lighting. In areas
the inverters recover up to 5% of the total where lighting is required due to architectural
energy used in the RTS, as shown in (Figure 1). considerations, energy efficient lighting, such
As an added advantage, the use of inverters in as, T5 fluorescent technology or the fast
Singapores RTS improves the receptivity of the emerging Light Emitting Diode (LEDs) lighting
traction network and consequently reduces the source are considered. At areas such as station
rate of wear on the trains mechanical brakes. entrances, the possibility of utilising natural
This decreases the costs for train maintenance. lighting is often explored to reduce the lighting
energy consumption.
Lighting System
In the development of lighting concept Within the public areas, such as, the concourse
within a station, the importance of functional and platform, different lighting control levels are
lighting generally takes precedence over implemented to cater for different operational
other aesthetic requirements. The design of needs. This allows the appropriate level of
the station lighting is in line with Singapore lighting to be selected at different periods in
Standard SS530 Energy Efficiency Standard order to minimise energy consumption.
Figure 1: Percentage of Overall Total Energy
With the adoption of PSDs, the stations to train weight, every effort has been made
cooling load and ECS electricity consumption to keep the train weight as low as possible.
is reduced by more than 50% as compared to Studies have been conducted to explore
those without PSDs. Table 1 gives a summary of advancement in rolling stock technology,
the estimated station cooling load and annual especially those on weight reduction of
ECS electricity consumption for the different passenger vehicles for the future rail projects.
ECS concepts evaluated.
As energy consumption is in direct
Apart from substantial savings in the electricity proportion to train weight, every
costs, savings in capital cost associated with effort has been made to keep the
train weight as low as possible.
providing smaller plants and station footprint
are also realised with the adoption of PSDs.
Therefore, it is effective to focus on weight
reduction of these sub-systems in order to
Rolling Stock
improve energy efficiency.
There are two major factors which contribute
to effective energy usage in Singapores trains.
i Carbody and Miscellaneous Equipment
They are:
The carbody is a major weight contributor
of the passenger vehicle, as seen in Figure 2.
a. Lightweight cars, which can be achieved
It constitutes about 21% of the Motor-car
through lighter carbody shells, bogies, electrical
weight. Therefore, the choice of material
propulsion and auxiliary equipment.
plays a vital role in determining the energy
b. Intensive use of regenerative braking and consumption pattern of a vehicle. With the
enhanced efficiency of traction equipment. adoption of aluminum alloy in the MRT
This can be achieved through improved system trains, significant improvement is noted in
design, optimisation of traction motor design the weldability, mechanical strength and
and providing need based energy storage corrosion resistance of the train body. This
arrangement. has also helped manufacturers to reduce the
carbody weight significantly.
In the following sections, it is shown how
weight management of the passenger vehicle, For the Singapore Circle Line (CCL) vehicles,
coupled with improved traction and auxiliary weight reduction of the carbody were also
systems and energy efficient driving, together reaped on other different aspects, namely,
with energy regeneration, contribute to by reducing the amount of glass; utilising
effective energy usage in rolling stock. skeletal cable trays, aluminium diffusers
and aluminium body side interior plates;
Weight Management and providing lighter seats which required
As energy consumption is in direct proportion less underside reinforcements. Through
5.0 35.0
30.0
4.0 considered in the alignment to reduce energy
25.0
3.0 20.0 requirements for braking and accelerating by
2.0 15.0
10.0
slowing the trains when entering the station
1.0
5.0
on the up-grade and facilitating acceleration
0.0 0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
when departing on the down-grade. This is
Coasting Allowance (%)
achieved by raising the station above the inter-
In the case of the MRT, the motors are station alignment, as shown in Figure 4.
rated at 145 kW (1 hour rating) and two
Figure 4: Hump Profile
thirds of the axles are motored. The whole
question of schedule speed, proportion of
motored axles, peak power available and
control regime is very complex, and their Station A Station B
Based on the simulation studies and assuming Green Mark for RTS
inter-station distance of 1.5km with a hump In recent years, LTA has been working with
profile gradient of 3%, the difference in train manufacturers and system suppliers
the energy consumption travelling between to improve the energy efficiency of its MRT
stations with and without the hump profile by system. To leverage on the best practices and
a 6-car train having a loading of 6 passengers/ to go even greener, the Green Mark for Rail
m2 is 5.5kWH. The simulation studies have Transit System (RTS) framework was drawn up
also shown that there is some reduction in the as a holistic approach to ensure that the design
inter-station run times. of RTS takes into account environmental and
sustainability considerations.
...the use of hump profile is
considered in the alignment to reduce The framework covers various aspects of a RTS
energy requirements for braking and line from E&M systems and station design,
accelerating by slowing the trains to operational considerations, as well as,
when entering the station on the assessing areas where green technology or
up-grade and facilitating acceleration advanced methods can lead to better use of
when departing on the down-grade.
resources from a whole-life-cycle approach.
It also provides the necessary benchmark to
Control of Escalators incentivise continual improvement beyond the
In the current design of escalators for RTS, current state (Figure 5).
an energy saving device, such as, an inverter
Figure 5 Green Mark for Rapid Transit System framework
system, is being provided to conserve energy
when the escalator is operated at no load by the
Green Mark for Rapid Transit System framework
reduction of speed (0.75m/s) to standby speed Aim
Objective
(0.2m/s). During an extended period of no load,
the energy saving device will also be able to
further reduce the speed from standby speed
Green Strategy 1 Green Strategy 2 Green Strategy 3
to stop. This speed reduction is achieved by use Environmental
Effective Use Protection and Water Conservation
of sensor detection at the escalator landings. of Energy Sustainable
Development
Provision is also made to allow the escalator to
be operated without this energy saving device,
for example, by using star/delta starter. The aim of the framework is to enable and
to facilitate the design of RTS network to
Adjusting the speed of the escalator to slow minimise the environmental impact and
down when not in use can save energy by up enhance sustainability.
to 30%.
The framework was developed with the contribution of the particular strategy versus
following objectives: the overall sustainable development effort.
a) To promote sustainable and environmental
friendly design that meets the performance With this framework, LTA would be able to
and operational requirements of RTS assess the energy efficiency of the RTS network
networks. more effectively.
References
Chew, T.C and Chua, C.K. 1998. Development Of rapid transit, Singapore, 1986, pp. 397-403.
Singapores Rapid Transit System And The Environment.
Thong, T.L, Ho, H.C, and Sim, S.P. 2005. Energy
Japan Railway & Transport Review, No. 18 1998, 26-30.
Conservation Measures For Rapid Transit System In
Windle, C.J. 1986. Electricity saving strategies employed Singapore. Paper presented at the 7th Inetrnational Power
on the. Singapore MRT. International conference on Mass Engineering Conference (IPEC), 2005. Singapore.
Melvyn Thong is the Director of Mechanical & Electrical Services (MES) for
the upcoming Thomson Line (TSL) and existing lines in the Land Transport
Authority, Singapore. He has been with the LTA since 1999 with over 20
years experience, and is currently responsible for the design development
and implementation of TSL and Eastern Region Line (ERL). In addition,
he is also responsible for projects related to the upgrading of Electrical
& Mechanical Systems for existing lines that comprise both driver and
driverless heavy metro systems. Prior to this appointment, he was the
Deputy Director in MES Division, instrumental in the development of in-house design capabilities
within the organisation for traction power systems and tunnel ventilation systems for RTS, as well
as the development of the BCA-LTA Green Mark for RTS launched in 2010.