Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
General comments:
Note to student-A Content Evaluator evaluated the Content requirements for this submission, while
an Articulation of Response Evaluator evaluated the Professional Communication (Articulation)
aspect.
The Professional Communication (Articulation) aspect is evaluated based on competency levels within
the four writing traits of Organization, Sentence Fluency, Word Choice and Conventions.
Competency standards are met when a pattern of pervasive writing concerns is not found within a
submission.
Please click on the pdf file attached to this evaluation to download the task, which includes
examples of the most pervasive writing concerns found within the submission. The concerns
noted appear throughout the document and must be identified and corrected before resubmitting.
Direct links from the Guide to Academic Writing Resource are also included within the examples to
assist with correcting these writing concerns throughout the work. For more information regarding
the four writing traits and assistance with addressing writing concerns, please access the Guide to
Academic Writing at the following link: The Guide to Academic Writing Learning Resource.
Students are encouraged to schedule a live appointment with the WGU Writing Center, please
contact them at the following link: WGU Writing Center. Student Mentors and Course Mentors may
also assist students with scheduling WGU Writing Center appointments.
10/28/17: Content--Please confer with a course mentor before working further on this submission.
The organized plan for Elegancy Events provides an appropriate framework for business operations,
with a clear mission, price list of events management services and packages, and a plan to monitor
revenue, margins, and customer satisfaction. Several aspects of the plan are incomplete. Please
review comments and provide clarification to deliver a well-aligned business plan.
Detailed Results
(Rubric used: QGT1 Task 1 (0515))
CRITERION SCORE:
0.00
Please click on the pdf file attached to this evaluation to download the task, which
includes examples of the most pervasive writing concerns found within the submission.
Printed on: 10/31/2017 12:13:08 PM (EST)
The concerns noted appear throughout the document and must be identified and corrected
before resubmitting. Direct links from the Guide to Academic Writing Resource are also included
within the examples to assist with correcting these writing concerns throughout the work. For
more information regarding the four writing traits and assistance with addressing writing
concerns, please access the Guide to Academic Writing at the following link: The Guide to
Academic Writing Learning Resource.
Students are encouraged to schedule a live appointment with the WGU Writing Center, please
contact them at the following link: WGU Writing Center. Student Mentors and Course
Mentors may also assist students with scheduling WGU Writing Center appointments.
The work includes The work includes The work includes a The work includes
several major a few major errors few minor errors no readily
errors that disrupt and/or many minor but no readily detectable major or
the meaning or flow errors that detectable major minor errors.
of the response. interfere with the errors.
clarity of the
response.
CRITERION SCORE:
0.00
Please click on the pdf file attached to this evaluation to download the task, which
includes examples of the most pervasive writing concerns found within the submission.
The concerns noted appear throughout the document and must be identified and corrected
before resubmitting. Direct links from the Guide to Academic Writing Resource are also included
within the examples to assist with correcting these writing concerns throughout the work. For
more information regarding the four writing traits and assistance with addressing writing
concerns, please access the Guide to Academic Writing at the following link: The Guide to
Academic Writing Learning Resource.
CRITERION SCORE:
3.00
A2. MISSION
CRITERION SCORE:
2.00
CRITERION SCORE:
0.00
10/28/17: Four goals are identified. Discussion of each goal is not fully developed in the
response.
CRITERION SCORE:
0.00
10/28/17: The submission identifies three factors critical to the company's success. Logical
discussion of the presented keys to success is not evident.
CRITERION SCORE:
1.00
10/28/17: Factors that influence the event management industry are presented, referencing
the competitive landscape and prior recessionary impacts. A history of the event management
industry is not fully developed in the response.
CRITERION SCORE:
3.00
CRITERION SCORE:
0.00
10/28/17: The submission identifies the street and some equipment needs in a discussion of
start-up expenses, marketing costs, and future expansion plans. A focused discussion of the
specific location for the business and the types of facilities needed for Elegancy Events is not
clearly developed.
B4.MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
1.00
10/28/17: The owners of the business are identified. A precise discussion of the management
structure, including key positions and specific responsibilities, is not provided.
CRITERION SCORE:
2.00
10/28/17: A suitable discussion of the event management and package services is provided.
CRITERION SCORE:
1.00
10/28/17: The profile states an income range demographic and describes some needs of
potential clients. Customers in the business sector are also mentioned. As presented, the
response lacks sufficient demographic, geographic, and/or other segmentation variables to fully
profile the individual and business client market segments.
CRITERION SCORE:
0.00
10/28/17: The work addresses trends in terms of social media and the labor-intensive nature
of event planning. As presented, sufficient detail regarding the current and future state of the
industry is not evident. Further elaboration is needed.
CRITERION SCORE:
3.00
CRITERION SCORE:
2.00
CRITERION SCORE:
3.00
CRITERION SCORE:
3.00
CRITERION SCORE:
1.00
CRITERION SCORE:
1.00
10/28/17: The submission includes a three-year sales forecast based on business clients and a
discussion that claims industry and local market information has been evaluated. A month-to-
month forecast of sales for the first year and a correlated discussion, with specific details of
what the market conditions in the industry and local market are, is not provided.
CRITERION SCORE:
0.00
10/28/17: Positioning and differentiation strategies are discussed. A clear plan to launch the
business, including target dates, activities, and goals for implementation, is not provided.
Printed on: 10/31/2017 12:13:08 PM (EST)
E2. MONITORING PLAN
CRITERION SCORE:
2.00
CRITERION SCORE:
Printed on: 10/31/2017 12:13:08 PM (EST)
0.00
10/28/17: A profit and loss statement is provided in the submission. A number of fields are
not calculated and a net profit figure is not evident.
CRITERION SCORE:
0.00
CRITERION SCORE:
1.00
10/28/17: A broad discussion of expenses and assets is provided. Specific detail connected to
the financial statements is not fully developed.
CRITERION SCORE:
0.00
10/28/17: The submission broadly discusses trends in the financial statements. A direct
response to this aspect in which the financial position of the business is quantified could not
be located.
CRITERION SCORE:
0.00
10/28/17: Some capital needs are presented in the plan. However, a discussion of the
company's initial and future estimated capital/investment needs aligned to the financial
statements is not provided.
H. SOURCES
CRITERION SCORE:
0.00
10/28/17: Citations are present in the work and a references list is provided. This aspect can
be more fairly assessed once appropriate discussion of the history and analysis of the current
and future state of the industry is in place.