Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Contents
1.0 - Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 2
2.0 Features in VMware when compared to Microsoft Microsofts Hyper V Server 2012 ...... 2
2.1 - Local machine processor................................................................................................ 2
2.2 - Host CPUs: ................................................................................................................... 2
2.3 - Maximum supported running VMs .............................................................................. 2
2.4 - Nested virtualisation: ..................................................................................................... 2
2.5 - Integration with AWS: ................................................................................................... 3
3.0 Features in Microsoft Microsofts Hyper V Server 2012 when compared to VMware
vSphere ...................................................................................................................................... 3
3.1 - Time in deploying servers:............................................................................................. 3
3.2 - Maximum supported host memory: ............................................................................... 3
3.3 - Maximum Virtual Switches: .......................................................................................... 3
3.4 - Cost ................................................................................................................................ 3
4.0 - Comparison between the two platforms based on some new features. ............................. 5
4.1 - Feature in trial version ................................................................................................... 5
5.0 - Service support for Microsoft Hyper V Server 2012: ....................................................... 5
6.0 - Open source challenge for Microsoft Hyper V ................................................................. 6
7.0 - Require updates: ................................................................................................................ 6
8.0 - Recommendation ............................................................................................................... 6
8.1 Requirement 1 ............................................................................................................... 6
8.2 Requirement 2 ............................................................................................................... 6
9.0 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................... 7
List of figures
Fig. 1- The rough cost analysis between VMware vSphere and Microsoft Hyper V4
Fig. 2 - The annual cost estimation between vSphere an Hyper V in graphical form . 4
Fig. 3 - The live migration of the virtual hard disk from the source device to the destination
device even when the VM is running 5
1.0 - Introduction
Which platform is best for the cloud infrastructure for intertrode network VMware vSphere
or Microsoft Microsoft Hyper V Server 2012 .
Three years have have passed to design intrtrode nrtwork on the vm ware vsphere and thb
time is there to change the infrastructure and now one question is in mind of the customere
whether to stay with the older cloud or would shift to the new one which is Microsoft hyper v
and Microsoft is a well known brand in the whole world in the IT field.
Bothe the cloud service providers are at war to implement their service in this field and
According to article published by Contel (Bradford, 2015) VM Ware is still a dominant force
in the market which has several products related to virtualisation and VM and are specifically
designed to meet the client need in the IT field and products like vSphere still scores high in
the customer satisfaction field which is required in todays marketing
According to (Antonowicz, 2008) both the platforms are Microsoft Hyper V Server 2012isor
based solutions and donot require any additional OS and are directly installed on the
hardware of the system.
Fig. 2 - The annual cost estimation between vSphere an Hyper V in graphical form
4.0 - Comparison between the two platforms based on some new features.
4.1 - Feature in trial version
For the trial version (Mauro, 2016) Hyper v provides the same features in trial version which
are present in the paid version whereas in the trial version of the VMware vSphere only
limited to backup data feature and other limited features are there and if anyone wants to try
the additional features then he or she has to pay to go for enterprise version.
Example of one most of the most essential feature which is live migration in which the
storage and the host which are live can be migrated without shutting our VMs as shown in
fig.3
This feature is not available in the trial version of the VMware vSphere where it is present in
the trial version of the Microsoft Hyper v.
So if a customer enjoys trial version then surely he will get attracted to the Hyper V.
Fig. 3 - The live migration of the virtual hard disk from the source device to the destination
device even when the VM is running.
Virtual disk format
Virtual disk in Microsoft was previously known as VHD where as it is upgraded to VHDX
now it supports much storage upto 64 Gb and it provides the protection against the power
failure.
In vSphere virtual disk format is available in different forms which are
1. Thick provisioning: the storage is registered and is allocated to the vm only
2. Thin provisioning: the storage is allocated according to the requirement and no
reservation of the storage is there.
8.0 - Recommendation:
According to the features compared above both the Hypervisors Microsoft HyperV Server
2012 and VMwares vSphere we came to the conclusion that according to the requirements of
the client it depends whether the hypervisor of Hyper V or vSphere is best
8.1 Requirement 1
If the requirements of the intertrode network client for the network is
Live Migration, Scalability time, Cost
Then Microsoft Hyper V Server 2012 is good option as it covers all the three above reuired
options.
8.2 Requirement 2
On the other hand, if the requirement of the network client for intertrode network include
Nested virtualisation, Good service Support, Making virtualisation possible on 32 bit
processors if the company has legacy system processors, AWS services in future
Then in that case we recommend that the client should stay with the present Hypervisor
which is VMwares vSphere as it will also integrate with Amazon Web Services sooner
(Eric_Allione, 2017) which is the best option for the client then large number of IT services
he will get under the same platform.
9.0 Bibliography
Antonowicz, T. (2008, 8 14). What is the basic difference between VMware and Hyper-V.
Retrieved from Mosaic Technology: http://www.mosaictec.com/tessera/what-is-the-
basic-difference-between-vmware-and-hyper-v.htm
Bradford, C. (2015, 12). Virtualization Wars: VMware vs. Hyper V: Which is Right For Your
Virtual Environment? Retrieved from storage craft recovery:
https://www.storagecraft.com/blog/virtualization-wars-vmware-vs-hyper-v-which-is-
right-for-your-virtual-environment/
Eric_Allione. (2017, 4 12). VMware Technology network. Retrieved from discussions :
https://communities.vmware.com/thread/561677
Hurley, D. (2014, 6 24). 12 challenges for open source projects. Retrieved from open
source.com: https://opensource.com/life/14/6/12-challenges-open-source-projects
Mauro, A. (2016, 11 23). Microsoft Hyper v 2016 vs VM ware vsphere 5.6. Retrieved from
vinfrastructure blog: http://vinfrastructure.it/2016/11/microsoft-hyper-v-2016-vs-
vmware-vsphere-6-5/
Roussey, B. (2016, 11 23). PICK YOUR POISON: VMWARE VSPHERE VS. MICROSOFT
HYPER-V. Retrieved from Tech Genix: http://techgenix.com/vmware-vsphere-vs-
microsoft-hyper-v/