Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Steven Errede
LECTURE NOTES 17
Proper Time and Proper Velocity
As you progress along your world line {moving with ordinary velocity u in lab frame
IRF(S)} on the ct vs. x Minkowski/space-time diagram, your watch runs slow {in your rest
frame IRF(S')} in comparison to clocks on the wall in the lab frame IRF(S).
The clocks on the wall in the lab frame IRF(S) tick off a time interval dt, whereas in your
rest frame IRF( S ) the time interval is: dt dt u 1 u2 dt
n.b. this is the exact same time dilation formula that we obtained earlier, with:
u 1 1 u c 1 1 u2 and: u u c
2
We use u u relative speed of an object as observed in an inertial reference frame
{here, u = speed of you, as observed in the lab IRF(S)}.
We will henceforth use v v relative speed between
two inertial systems e.g. IRF( S ) relative to IRF(S):
The name proper is due to a mis-translation of the French word propre, meaning own.
Proper time is different than ordinary time, t.
Proper time is a Lorentz-invariant quantity, whereas ordinary time t depends on the
choice of IRF - i.e. ordinary time is not a Lorentz-invariant quantity.
In terms of 4-D space-time, proper time is analogous to arc length S in 3-D Euclidean space.
Special designation is given to being in the rest frame of an object.
The rest frame of an object = the proper frame.
Consider a situation where you are on an airplane flight from NYC to LA. The pilot comes on
the loudspeaker and announces in mid-flight that the jet stream is flowing backwards today, and
that the planes present velocity is u 0.8c u 0.8!! , due west.
What the pilot means by velocity is the spatial displacement d per unit time interval dt .
The pilot is referring to the planes velocity relative to the ground (n.b. here, we make the
simplifying assumption that the earth is non-rotating/non-moving, so that we can use IRFs)
Thus, d and dt are quantities as measured by an observer on the ground (e.g. an airplane
flight controller, using RADAR) in the ground-based (lab) IRF(S).
d d and dt are measured in the
Thus: u = ordinary velocity in the lab IRF(S)
dt ground-based (lab) IRF(S)
You, on the other hand are in your own rest frame IRF(S') in the airplane, sitting in your seat.
You know that the distance from NYC to LA is L 2763 miles (as measured on the ground,
referring to your trusty Rand-McNally Road Atlas {back pages} that you brought along with you).
So you, from your perspective, might be more interested in the quantity known as your
proper velocity , defined as:
d Spatial displacement, as measured on the ground
Proper 3-Velocity: = hybrid measurement = (in lab IRF(S)) per unit time interval, as measured
d in your (or an objects) rest frame (in IRF(S')).
1 1
dt 1 u2 dt 1 u c dt and: u , u u c
2
Since: d dt
u 1 u2
d d d d 1 1 n.b.
Then: u , but: u uu u u
d 1
dt dt dt 1 u
2
1 u c
2
0 u
u
If u 0.8c u 0.8 , then: u 1 1 u2 1 1 0.82 53 , hence: u u 53 0.8c 5 4
3 5 c 43 c !!!
Of course, for non-relativistic speeds u c , then: u to a high degree.
From a theoretical perspective, an appealing aspect of proper 3-velocity is that it Lorentz-
transforms simply from one IRF to another IRF.
= 3-D spatial component(s) of a relativistic 4-vector,
dx
The {contravariant} proper 4-velocity is:
whose zeroth/temporal/scalar component is:
d
1
dx 0
cdt dt dt c c u
0 c uc uc with: 1 u2
d d 1
dt dt 1 u2 1 u c
2
u u c u
The numerator of the proper 4-velocity dx is the displacement 4-vector (as measured in the
ground-based (lab) IRF(S). The denominator of the proper 4-velocity d = proper time interval
(as measured in your (or an objects) rest frame IRF(S').
Suppose we want to Lorentz transform your proper 4-velocity from the lab IRF(S) to another
(different) IRF(S") along a common x -axis, in which IRF(S") is moving with relative velocity
v vx with respect to lab IRF(S):
0
0 1
0 0 0 0 1
1 1
0 0 1 with: 1 2
1 0
v 2
0 0 1 0 2 2 v
3 3 2
0 0 0 1 3
3 c
dx dx
Where: and:
d d
Compare this result to the same Lorentz transformation of ordinary 3-velocities, along a
common x -axis. We use the Einstein velocity addition rule:
dx ux v
u u x x u y y u z z ux
dt 1 u x v c 2
dy uy 1 v
u ux x uy y uz z u y with: and:
dt 1 u x v c 2 1 2 c
dz uz
uz
dt 1 u x v c 2
{See Griffiths Example 12.6 (p. 497-98) and Griffiths Problem 12.14 (p. 498)}
Now we can see why Lorentz transformation of ordinary velocities is more cumbersome
than Lorentz transformation of proper 4-velocities:
d numerator,d d
For ordinary 3-velocities u , we must Lorentz transform both
dt denominator,dt dt
dx
For proper 4-velocities we only need to transform the numerator, d d .
d
Relativistic 3-momentum: p m u mu is the spatial part of a
0
relativistic 4-momentum vector: p m , i.e. p p , p .
mc mc 1
But: p 0 m 0 u mc with: and: u u c
1 u2 1 u c 1 u2
2
c c
Thus: p E c m u mc where: u c
0 0 0
1 u2 1 u c
2
Since: p m u mu , then: p p u m u u mu u u mc u u mc u E c .
mc 2 mc 2 1
Relativistic Energy: E u mc with: and: u u c
2
1 u2 1 u c 1 u2
2
p0 E c
1
p px
Therefore, the components of the relativistic 4-momentum are: p 2
p
p y
p 3 pz
p p E c px2 p y2 pz2 E c p 2 mc
2 2 2
1
Since: E u mc then: u2 mc 2 pc mc 2 or: pc u2 1 mc 2 . But:
2 2 2 2 2 2
1 u2
1 1 1 u2 u2
hence: pc u2 1 mc 2 2
mc 2
2 2 2 2 2 2 2
1 mc mc
1 u 1 u 1 u
2 2
or: pc u u mc 2 . However: E u mc 2 Thus, we {again} also see that: p p u E c .
Note that the relativistic energy E of a massive object is non-zero even when that object is
stationary - i.e. in its own rest frame when: p = 0, u 0 and: u 1 1 u2 1 .
Then: Erest mc = rest energy = rest mass * c2. Einsteins famous formula!
2
If u 0 , then the remainder of the relativistic energy E is attributable to the motion of the particle
i.e. it is relativistic kinetic energy, Ekin .
1
1
Relativistic Kinetic Energy: Ekin u 1 mc 2
1 mc
2
1 mc 2
1 u 1 u c
2 2
1 3 mu 4 1
In the non-relativistic regime u c , then: Ekin mu 2
2
mu 2 (classical formula).
2 8 c 2
2
p
However, for u c then: p mu and thus: Ekin (classical formula).
2m
Note that total relativistic energy, Etot and total relativistic 3-momentum, ptot ptot
are separately conserved in a closed system.
If the system is not closed, (e.g. external forces are present) then Etot and ptot will not {necessarily}
be conserved. Simply expand/enlarge the definition of the system until it is closed {e.g.
include whats producing the external forces}, then the (new) Etot and ptot will be conserved.
Example: The {unstable} charged pi-meson decays (via weak charged-current interaction, with
mean/proper lifetime 26.0 ns ) to a muon and muon neutrino: v . The charged
pion mass m is not conserved in the decay { m (m mv ) }, however the relativistic
Since the scalar product of any relativistic 4-vector a with itself is a Lorentz-invariant quantity
(i.e. = same numerical value in any IRF): then here, for v decay:
p p p p p 0 p p E c p2 E
2 2 2 2
But: c p2 m c
2 2
Thus: p p p2 m c p2 m c
mc 2
mc 2 mc 2 5 2
E mc
3
2
9 16 4
1 1
5 25 25
5 5
before
Thus: Etot Etot1 Etot2 2 u mc 2 2 mc 2 mc 2
4 2
5 2
However, Etot is {always} conserved in a closed system. Etot
after
Etot
before
mc
2
after before
And ptot is also {always} separately conserved in a closed system. ptot ptot 0
after 1 1
u after 0 since: ptot uafter Mu after 0 . n.b. uafter 1
1 1 uafter c
2 2
uafter
5 2 5
after
Then: Etot uafter Mc 2 Mc 2 mc EToT
before
M m 2m !!! Does this sound crazy??
2 2
This is what happens in the everyday world of particle physics! Its perfectly OK !!!
e.g. The production of a neutral rho meson in electron-positron collisions: e e 0 .
The rest mass of the neutral rho meson is: M 0 770 MeV c 2 Electron rest mass: me 0.511 MeV c 2
p 0 0
p1 px p2 px
x
me me
M 0
Run the collision process backwards in time, e.g. the decay of a neutral rho meson: 0 e e
p 0 0
p1 p x p2 p x
x
me me
M 0
For our above macroscopic inelastic collision problem, microscopically what would the new
matter of the macroscopic mass M be made up of, since M M 2m 52 m 2m 12 m ???
In a classical analysis of the inelastic collision of two relativistic macroscopic lumps of clay
{each of mass m} the composite / stuck-together single lump of clay of mass M 52 m 2m would
be very hot it would have a great deal of thermal energy in fact !!!
5 2
Mc 2 mc 2 mc 2 Ethermal Ethermal = 0.5mc2!!! E = mc2 = Einsteins energy-mass formula
2 classical mass
of composite
lump
Pion rest mass: m 139.57 MeV c 2 Pion mean lifetime: 26.033 nsec 26.033 109 sec
Muon rest mass: m 105.66 MeV c 2 Muon neutrino rest mass: mvu 0 (assumed).
In the rest frame of the meson:
p 0
p px pv px
x
m mv 0
M
Energy Conservation: Momentum Conservation:
before
before
Before: Etot m c 2 ptot 0
after
After: after
Etot E Ev m c 2 ptot p pv 0 p pv px
But: Ev pv c pv c since: mv 0 . p p = pv pv
E2 m2 c 4
Then: E after
tot E Ev E pv c but: pv p
c
after
Etot E Ev E pv c E E2 m2 c 4 Etot
before
m c 2
E E2 m2 c 4 m c 2 Solve for E :
2
E2 m2 c 4 m c 2 E m2 c 4 2 m c 2 E E2 or: 2m c 2 E m2 c 4 m2 c 4
Thus: E
m2 c 4 m2 c 4
m
2
m2 c 2 and: pv p
E2 m2 c 4
with: p pv
2
2m c 2m c
as viewed from the rest frame of the meson.
In classical collisions, total 3-momentum ptot and total mass, mtot are always conserved:
before after
ptot ptot , mtot
before
mtot
after
.
tot
In classical collisions, if total kinetic energy Ekin is not conserved inelastic collision.
An inelastic (i.e. a sticky) collision generates heat at the expense of kinetic energy.
An inelastic collision of an electron (e) with an atom {initially in its ground state} may
leave the atom in an excited state, or even ionized, kicking out a once-bound atomic electron!
Internal {quantum} degrees of freedom can be excited in inelastic e - atom collisions.
An explosive collision generates kinetic energy at the expense of chemical (i.e. EM)
energy, or nuclear (i.e. strong-force) energy, or weak-force energy. . . .
If kinetic energy is conserved (classically), elastic (i.e. billiard-ball) collision.
In relativistic collisions, total 3-momentum and total energy are always conserved
(in a closed system) but total mass and total kinetic energy are not in general conserved.
* Once again, in relativistic collisions, a process is called elastic if the total kinetic energy
is conserved total mass is also conserved in relativistic elastic collisions.
* A relativistic collision is called inelastic if the total kinetic energy is not conserved.
Total mass is not conserved in a relativistic inelastic collision.
An incident photon of energy E0 p0 c elastically scatters (i.e. bounces off of/recoils) from
an electron, which is initially at rest in the lab frame. Determine the final energy E of the
outgoing scattered photon as a function of the scattering angle of the photon:
pbefore
tot
pbefore
pbefore
00 0
e
y direction
y direction
pafter
tot
pafter
pafter
0 p pafter
after
e e
y direction
y direction
Since: p pafter
after
e
Or: pafter
pafter
e
E0
pbefore
tot (n.b. pebefore
0 , since e initially at rest, hence pbefore
e
0)
c
pafter
tot
pafter
pafter
p cos pe cos
e
Since: pbefore
TOT
pafter
TOT
then: E0 c p cos pe cos
2
E
sin cos thus: cos 1 sin 1
2
sin 2
c
But:
p c
e e
2
E0 E
p cos pe 1 sin 2
c p c
e
before
E
after
tot
E
tot
before
Conservation of Energy: Etot Etot
after
E me c E Ee E pe2 c 2 me2 c 4
0 2
2
E0 me c 2 E E0 2 E0 E cos E2 me2 c 4
1
Solve for E (after some algebra): E
1 cos me c 2 E0
E = energy of recoil photon in terms of initial photon energy E0 , scattering angle of photon
and rest energy/mass of electron, me c 2 .
hc
2
Get: 0 1 cos me c 2 0.511MeV 0.511 106 eV
me c
hc
Define the so-called Compton wavelength of the electron: e 2
2.426 1012 m
m c
e
Then: 0 e 1 cos
d Tunpol , 1 2 e2
re 1 cos 2 where: re
Classical
2.82 1015 m
e
electron
d 2 4 o me c 2
radius
However, when E0 me c 2 from the above discussion of the relativistic kinematics of photon-
free electron scattering, it is obvious that the classical theory is not valid in this regime. The
fully-relativistic quantum mechanical theory that of quantum electrodynamics (QED) is
required to get it right... Without going into the gory details, the results of the QED calculation
associated with the two Feynman graphs {the so-called s- and u-channel diagrams} shown on
p. 5 of P436 Lect. Notes 14.5 for the Compton differential scattering cross section known as
the Klein-Nishina formula for relativistic {unpolarized} photon-free electron scattering is:
d Cunpol , 1 1 x2 1 cos
2
re2 1 cos 2 1
e
scattering cross section agrees with the classical Thomson scattering cross section, as shown in the
figure below of the normalized differential scattering cross section r12 d Cunpol
d cos vs. .
e e
Note that as x the relativistic Compton differential scattering cross section becomes
increasingly sharply peaked in the forward direction, 0 .
v z
Without any loss of generality, we can choose the lab velocity v of the atom to be along the z
axis in the lab frame IRF {note that: z z v }.
hf
The energy of the photon in the atoms rest frame IRF is: E pc hf where: p p c
is the magnitude of the photons momentum in the atoms rest frame IRF. We can also assume
without loss of generality that the emitted photons momentum vector p lies in the y-z plane
of the atoms rest frame IRF. In the atoms rest frame IRF, the emitted photon makes an angle
with respect to the z axis.
p E c , px , py , pz hf
c
, 0, hfc sin , hfc cos hf
c 1, 0,sin , cos
We then carry out a 1-D Lorentz transformation from the atoms rest frame IRF to the lab frame
IRF, boosted along the z z v axis (see e.g. Physics 436 Lect. Notes 16, p. 11), where:
v c and: 1 1 2 :
E c 0 0 E c 0 0 1
px 0 1 0 0 px hf 0 1 0 0 0
p
v p v
py 0 0 1 0 py c 0 0 1 0 sin
pz 0 0 pz 0 0 cos
cos 1 cos
hf 0 hf 0
c sin c sin
cos cos
Thus, in the lab IRF, the emitted photons 4-momentum vector is:
hf
p E c , p x , p y , p z 1 cos , 0,sin , cos
c
The emitted photons energy as observed in the lab IRF is: E hf hf 1 cos .
The frequency of the emitted photon observed in the lab IRF is: f f 1 cos .
Experimentally, the atoms rest frame photon emission angle is {often} not measureable;
the lab frame photon emission angle is what is measured experimentally. Hence, in order for this
formula to be useful, we must re-write this expression in terms of the lab frame photon emission
angle . The relationship between the atoms rest frame photon emission angle and the lab
frame photon emission angle can be obtained by analyzing the 3-momentum components of the
photon in the atoms rest frame p vs. the lab frame p , as shown in the figures below:
In the lab frame IRF, the 4-vector momentum components of the emitted photon are:
E hf hf 1 cos E 1 cos
px 0 px
p y p sin p sin py
pz p cos p cos
cos cos
Thus: cos .
1 cos 1 cos
However, we need an expression for cos in terms of cos . Solve for cos :
1 cos cos cos cos cos cos cos
cos cos cos cos cos 1 cos cos
cos cos
cos
cos 1 1 cos
cos 1 v
Thus: f f 1 cos f 1 where: and:
1 cos 1 2 c
1 n.b. RHS expressed
1 cos 1 1 cos entirely in lab frame
Or: f 1 f f 1 cos f
1 2
IRF variables i.e.
1 cos experimentally
measured quantities
Similarly, we can also obtain a relation for sin using:
sin
Thus: sin
1 cos
cos
And: cos
1 cos
sin sin
Hence: tan
cos cos
cos
Since: cos
1 cos
Then:
sin sin sin
sin
1 cos cos 1 cos cos 2
1
1 cos 1 cos
sin 2 1 cos sin
1 cos sin
1 2
1 cos
sin
Thus: sin
1 cos
cos
And: cos
1 cos
sin sin
Hence: tan
cos cos
Comments:
cos cos
From: cos and: f f 1 cos f 1
1 cos 1 cos
1.) The photon will be emitted in the forward direction in the lab frame IRF { 0 90 }
when the numerator: cos 0 , i.e. when: cos {n.b. cos 0 for 90 180 }.
2.) The photon will be emitted in the backward direction in the lab frame IRF { 90 180 }
when the numerator: cos 0 , i.e. when: cos .
3.) When 1 v c , all photons are emitted in the forward direction in the lab frame IRF.
The differential rate of emission of such photons into solid angle element d d cos d
in the stars rest frame IRF is:
dR d dN d dN dt
# sec sr
d d dt d
The differential luminosity of the star as measured in its rest frame IRF is:
dL d E R dR d dN d dN dt
E E E Joules sec sr Watts sr
d d d d dt d
Suppose that you are an astronomer on earth, observing this star through a telescope. Your
inertial reference frame is the lab frame IRF. {For simplicitys sake here, we neglect/ignore the
motion of the earth}. If the star is moving with velocity v z z , then what is the differential
luminosity dL d in the earths lab frame IRF i.e. how is dL d related to dL d ?
There are three inertial reference frame effects that must be taken into account here:
Time dilation: dt dt Rate of emission in rest frame IRF rate of emission in lab frame IRF
Angle transformation: d d
Lorentz transformation from rest frame IRF of star to lab frame IRF.
Doppler effect: E E
dt 1
The time dilation effect is: dt dt or: , where: 1 1 2 and: v c .
dt
The 1-D Lorentz transformation from the stars rest frame IRF to the lab frame IRF on earth, for
v z z is the same as that for the above relativistic Doppler shift example:
The 4-momentum vector associated with a photon emitted from the surface of the star in the rest
frame IRF of the star is: p E c , px , py , pz Ec , 0, Ec sin , Ec cos Ec 1, 0,sin , cos
Thus, the photons 4-momentum vector as seen by an astronomer in the lab frame IRF is:
E
p E c , p x , p y , p z 1 cos , 0,sin , cos
c
Here {again}, we need to express this result in terms of lab frame IRF measured variables {only}:
cos sin
cos , sin and: E 1 cos E
1 cos 1 cos
Now, the lab frame IRF vs. the stars rest frame IRF solid angle elements are, respectively:
d d cos d and: d d cos d .
The infinitesimal solid angle element d d cos d and the infinitesimal area element
da R 2 d Rd cos Rd {where the infinitesimal and arc lengths S Rd cos and
S Rd , respectively} associated with the lab frame IRF are shown in the figure below.
As per the above discussion of the relativistic Doppler shift, for v z z , without any loss of
generality we can choose the observation point P r Rr to lie in the y-z plane ( 90 ):
z da R 2 d Rd cos Rd
r cos z sin y
d d cos d
v R
cos y sin z
x
Star y
90
x
For the choice of observation point P r Rr lying in the y-z plane ( 90 ), note that x
is to r cos z sin y . Thus, since transverse components of a 4-vector are unaffected by a
Lorentz transformation e.g. from the rest frame IRF to the lab frame IRF, then , hence
and d d . Thus, in order to determine the relationship between solid angle element
d d cos d and d d cos d , we only need to determine how d cos is related to
d cos . From above, we already have the relation:
cos
cos
1 cos
18 Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois
2005-2015. All Rights Reserved.
UIUC Physics 436 EM Fields & Sources II Fall Semester, 2015 Lect. Notes 17 Prof. Steven Errede
Hence:
d d cos d d cos 1 1
2
d d cos d d cos 1 cos 2
1
We also already have the relationship between E and E from the Lorentz transformation result:
E 1
E 1 cos E or:
E 1 cos
The lab frame vs. rest frame differential luminosity of the star are related to each other by:
dL dR d dN dt d E d dN
E E E
d d d dt dt d E d dt
dt d E dR dt d E dL Watts
E
dt d E d dt d E d sr
Thus:
dL dt d E dL 1 1 1 1 dL Watts
2
d dt d E d 1 cos 1 cos d sr
2
The differential luminosity of the star in its own rest frame IRF is thus:
dL dL
The total luminosity of the star in its own rest frame IRF is: L d 4 Watts
d d
since the emission of photons in the stars own rest frame is isotropic.
Hence the total luminosity of the star in its own rest frame IRF is:
Relativistic Dynamics
Newtons 1st Law of Motion: An object at rest remains at rest, an object moving with speed v
continues to move at speed v, unless acted upon by a net/non-zero/unbalanced force
the Law of Inertia is built/incorporated into in the Principle of Relativity.
Newtons 2nd law of motion {classical mechanics} retains its validity in relativistic mechanics,
provided that relativistic momentum is used:
dp r , t
F r,t ma r , t
dt
Griffiths Example 12.10: 1-D Relativistic Motion Under a Constant Force.
A particle of (rest) mass m is subject to a constant force: F r , t F Fx constant vector .
If the particle starts from rest at the origin at time t = 0, find its position x t as a function of t.
dp t dp t
Since the relativistic motion is 1-D, then: F = constant, or: F = constant.
dt dt
p t Ft constant of integration . The particle starts from rest at t = 0. p t 0 0
constant of integration = 0. p t Ft {here}
mu t 1
Relativistically: p t u t mu t Ft where: u t
1 u t c 1 u t c
2 2
Solve for u t : m 2u 2 F 2t 2 1 u 2 c 2 F 2t 2 F 2t 2 c 2 u 2 m F t
2 2 2
c 2 u 2 F 2t 2
Ft m
2
F 2t 2 Ft m Relativistic particle
Or: u 2
2
u t = velocity for constant
m F t c 1 Ft mc
2
1 Ft m c
2 2 2 2
applied force F
n.b. when: Ft mc 1 i.e. Ft m c then: u t Ft m Classical dynamics answer.
Ft m dx t t t t
Since: u t Then: x t 0 u t dt F m 0 dt
1 Ft m c dt 1 F mc t
2 2 2
2
F mc
t
mc 2
The motion is hyperbolic: x t 1 F mc t 2 1 F mc t 1
2 2 2
m F 0 F
n.b. Had we done this in classical dynamics, the result would have been parabolic motion:
F 2
x t t
2m
Thus, in relativistic dynamics e.g. a charged particle placed in a uniform electric field E ,
the resulting motion under a constant force F qE is hyperbolic motion (not parabolic motion,
as in classical dynamics) see/compare two cases, as shown in figure below:
Relativistic Work:
Relativistic work is defined the same as classical work: W F d
The Work-Energy Theorem (the net work done on a particle = increase in particles kinetic energy)
also holds relativistically:
dp dp d dp d
W F d d dt u dt Ekin since: u
dt dt dt dt dt
dp d mu mu mu
But: u u since: p u mu
dt dt 1 u c 2 1 u2 1 u c
2
Thus:
2
mu 2 u m u u du
dp m du c du mu du c
u 2 u 3 u 3
dt 1 u c dt 1 u c 2 2 dt 1 u c dt 1 u c 2 2 dt
2
2
2
u c du 1 u c u c du
2
1 mu du
3
mu 3 mu 3
1 u c dt dt 2 dt
2
1 u c 2 2 1 u c
2
2
1 u c
2
mu du d mc 2
3
1 u c 2 2 dt dt 1 u c 2
1 dp d dE
But: u u u mc tot
2
1 u c
2
dt dt dt
dp dp d dp
W F d d dt udt Ekin
Thus: dt dt dt dt
dE
tot dt Etotfinal Etot
initial
Etot
dt
Etotfinal Etot
initial
Ekin
final
mc 2 Ekin
initial
mc 2 Ekin
final
Ekin
initial
(final-initial) difference in
total energy = (final-initial)
Etot Ekin
difference in kinetic energy
i.e. W Etot E final
tot Einitial
tot Ekin Efinal
kin E
initial
kin
= work done on particle.
the same time, and in the {trivial} case where forces are constant, does Newtons 3rd Law hold!
dp r , t
F r,t
dt
The observant student may have noticed that because F r , t is the derivative of the
(relativistic) momentum p r , t with respect to the ordinary (and not the proper) time t, it
suffers from the same ugly behavior that ordinary velocity does, in Lorentz-transforming
dp r , t
it from one IRF to another: both numerator and denominator of must be transformed.
dt
Thus, if we carry out a Lorentz transformation from IRF(S) to IRF(S), along the x -axis
where v vx is velocity vector of IRF(S) as observed in IRF(S), and u is the velocity vector of
a particle of mass m as observed in IRF(S):
1 v
Then: where: with: v vx
1 2 c
First, let us work out the y and z (i.e. the transverse) components of the 3-D force F r , t
as seen in IRF(S) {they are simpler / easier to obtain. . . }:
dp dp dx
Noting that: F , F and that: dt dt dx and: u x
dt dt c dt
dp y
dpy dp y dt Fy
In IRF(S): Fy
dt dt
1 u x c
dx
dx 1
c c dt
dpz
dp dpz dt Fz
Similarly: Fz z
dt dt dx dx 1 u x c
1
c c dt
Now calculate the x -component of the force F r , t in IRF(S):
dpx dp 0 dE
dp dp 0 Fx c tot
dp dt where: p 0 Etot
In IRF(S): Fx x
x
dt dt
dt 1
dx 1 ux c c
dt dx c dt
c
dp
dEtot dEtot dp
But we have calculated above / earlier: u F u u F since: F
dt dt dt dt
Fx
Fx u F c Relativistic ordinary x, y, z force components
observed in IRF(S) acting on particle of mass m, for a
1 u c
x Lorentz transformation from lab IRF(S) to IRF(S).
Fy IRF(S) moving with velocity v vx relative to
Fy
1 u x c IRF(S) (as seen in IRF(S)), 1 1 2 , v c .
Fz
Fz Particle of mass m is moving with ordinary velocity
1 u x c u as seen in IRF(S).
We see that only when the particle of mass m is instantaneously at rest in lab IRF(S)
(i.e. u t 0 ) will we then have a simple Lorentz transformation of the ordinary force F F :
dp dt dp dt dt 1 1
K but: u
d d dt d dt 1 u
2
1 u c
2
dp dt dp dp
K u F where: F
d d dt dt
1 1 1 1 u
Thus: K u F F F where: u and: u
1 u2 1 u c 1 u 1 u c c
2 2 2
We can 4-vectorize the Minkowski Force, because its plainly / clearly a 4-vector:
dp 2 1 1 1 1
y: K2 uF2 F2 F2 with: u
d 1 u
2
1 u c
2
1 2
u 1 u c
2
dp 3 1 1
z: K3 uF3 F3 F3
d 1 u
2
1 u c
2
dp
Thus: K Minkowski 4-vector force = proper 4-vector force.
d
Relativistic dynamics can be formulated in terms of either ordinary quantities or proper
(particle rest frame) quantities. The latter is much neater / elegant, but it is (by its nature)
restricted to the particles rest frame IRF(S) {n.b. We can always Lorentz boost this proper
result to any other inertial reference frame. . . }
There is a very simple reason for this! Since we humans live in the lab frame IRF(S)
we want to know everything about particles trajectory, the forces acting on it, etc. in the lab
because this is the only IRF that we can (easily) carry out physical measurements in often, it is
not possible to make physical measurements e.g. in a particles rest frame / proper frame,
especially if the particles are in relativistic motion (e.g. at Fermilab/LHC/ hadron colliders).
In the long run, we will (usually) be interested in the particles trajectory as a function of
ordinary time, so in fact the ordinary 4-force F dp dt is often more useful, even if it is
more painful / cumbersome to calculate / compute
We want to obtain the relativistic generalization of the classical Lorentz force law
FC qE qu B { u = particles ordinary velocity in IRF(S)}. Does the classical formula FC
correspond to the ordinary relativistic force F , or to the proper / Minkowski force K ?
Thus, for the relativistic Lorentz force, should we write: F qE qu B q E u B ???
Or rather, should the relativistic Lorentz force relation be: K qE qu B q E u B ???
Since proper time and ordinary time are identical in classical physics / Euclidean /
Galilean 3-space, classical physics cant tell us the answer.
It turns out that the Lorentz force law is an ordinary relativistic force law: F q E u B
Well see why shortly Well also construct the proper / Minkowski EM force law, as well . . .
u u2
F p r n.b. Classically: p mu thus, classically: F m r
R R
u u
Thus, relativistically: QuBo r p r or: QuBo p or: p QBo R
R R
The relativistic cyclotron formula is identical to the classical / non-relativistic formula!
However here, p is understood to be the relativistic 3-momentum: p m u mu .
The application of the external uniform electric field E Eo y changes the physics the
electric charges are accelerated in the left segment of the loop and decelerated in the right
segment of the loop. [n.b. admittedly this is not a very realistic model, but other more realistic
models do lead to the same result see e.g. V. Hnizdo, Am. J. Phys. 65, 92 (1997)].
Find the total momentum of all of the charges in the loop.
The momenta associated with the electric charges in the left and right segments of the loop
cancel each other (i.e. p (in left segment) = p (in right segment), so we only need to consider the
momenta associated with the electric charges flowing in the top and bottom segments of the loop.
Suppose there are N charges flowing in the top segment of the loop, moving in x direction
with speed u u E 0 {because they underwent acceleration traveling on the LHS segment}
and N charges flowing in the bottom segment of the loop, moving in the x direction with
speed u u E 0 {because they underwent deceleration traveling on the RHS segment}.
Note that the current I u must be the same in all four segments of the loop, otherwise
charges would be piling up somewhere.
Qtot NQ Q Q
Since: then: I u N u = I u N u
Q Q I
N u N u I N u N u
Q
Classically, the linear momentum of each electric charge is pclassical mQ u where mQ = mass
of the charged particle.
The total classical linear momentum of the charged particles flowing to the right in the top
N
segment
segment of the loop is: ptopclassical mQ u N mQ u x
i 1
The total classical linear momentum of the charged particles flowing to the left in the bottom
N
segment of the loop is: pbottom
classical
segment
mQu N mQu x
i 1
The net (or total) classical linear momentum of the charged particles flowing in the loop is:
tot left segment top segment right segment bottom segment top segment bottom segment
pclassical pclassical pclassical pclassical pclassical pclassical pclassical
N mQ u x N mQ u x N u N u mQ x I Q I Q mQ x 0!!!
tot
Thus, pclassical 0 as we expected, since we know the loop is not moving.
However, now let us consider the relativistic momentum:
1 1
prel u mQ u (even if u u c ) where: u
1 u 1 u c
2 2
The total relativistic momentum of the charged particles flowing to the right in the top
1 1
segment of the loop is: ptoprel segment u N mQ u x where: u .
1 2 1 u c
2
The total relativistic momentum of the charged particles flowing to the left in the bottom
1 1
segment of the loop is: pbottom segment
u N mQ u x where: u .
1 2 1 u c
rel 2
tot I
But I I I gave us: N u N u
I
prel u u mQ x 0 because u u !!!
Q Q
Charged particles flowing in the top segment of the loop are moving faster than those flowing in
the bottom segment of the loop.
The gain in energy u mc 2 of the charged particles going up the left segment of the loop
= the work done on the charges by the electric force ( W QEo w ) (w = height of the rectangle).
Thus, for a charged particle going up the left segment of the loop, the energy gain is:
QEo w
E u mQ c 2 u mQ c 2 u u mQ c 2 W QEo w u
u
mQ c 2
Where Eo = the magnitude of the {uniform/constant} electric field.
tot I Q Eo w I E I w
prel
u u mQ x
m Qc
2
m Q x o 2 x
Q
Q c
This so-called macroscopic hidden linear momentum is strictly relativistic, purely mechanical
But note that it precisely cancels the electromagnetic linear momentum stored in the E and B
fields!!! (Microscopically, the momentum imbalance arises from the imbalance of virtual photon
emission on top segment of the loop vs. the bottom segment of the loop.)
Likewise, the corresponding hidden angular momentum precisely cancels the
electromagnetic angular momentum stored in the E and B fields.
Now go back and take another look at Griffiths Example 8.3, pages 356-57. (The coax cable
carrying uniform charge / unit length and steady current I flowing down / back cable.)
Lets pursue this problem a little further
Suppose there is a change in the current, e.g. suppose the current drops / decreases to zero.
dI
For simplicitys sake, assume K (i.e. the current decreases linearly with time)
dt
Q Q Q
I t N t u N t u N t u
Q
I t N t u We assume that u, u+ and u are
unaffected by the change in the
current with time.
dI dI t dI t Q dN t Q dN t
Then: u u K
dt dt dt dt dt
dN t dN t K
u u = constant (no time dependence on RHS of equation)
dt dt Q
Then:
dpclassical t dN t K mQ K mQ
mQ u x x x
dt dt Q Q
Constant
dpclassical t dN t K mQ K mQ
mQ u x x x
dt dt Q Q
1 1
Then: ptoprel segment t u N t mQ u x where: u .
1 2 1 u c
2
1 1
And: pbottom segment
t u N t mQu x where: u .
1 2 1 u c
rel 2
dptoprel segment t dN t K mQ
And: u mQ u x constant u x
dt dt Q
dpbottom segment
t dN t K mQ
And: rel
u mQ u x constant u x
dt dt Q
The net / total time rate of change of relativistic linear momentum is:
tot
dprel t dptoprel segment t dpbottom segment
t
u
K mQ K mQ
x u x
rel
dt dt dt Q Q
K mQ
u u
x 0 u u
Q
QEo w
From above (p. 20): u
u
mQ c 2
where: Eo = electric field amplitude
tot
dprel t Q Eo w K m Q E K w E KA A w = cross-
x o 2 x o 2 x
dt m Qc2 Q c c sectional area of the loop
dI dm dI
Now: K and: m IA A (Since A = constant).
dt dt dt
dm dI
KA A = time rate of change of the magnetic dipole moment of the loop.
dt dt
tot
dprel t 1 dm t E x
dt c 2 dt
o but: m m z E E y
o
tot
Frel t
dprel t 1 dm t
2
E 0 (assuming external E -field is constant in time)
dt c dt
One might think that this net hidden force would be exactly cancelled / compensated for by
a countering force due to the electromagnetic fields, as we saw in the static case ( dI dt 0 ),
with a steady current I. But it isnt!! Why??
As we saw for M(1) magnetic dipole radiation, a time-varying current in a loop produces EM
radiation. Essentially there is a radiation reaction / back-force that acts on the antenna a
radiation pressure much like the recoil / impulse from firing a bullet out of a gun the short
explosive pulse launches the bullet, but the gun is also kicked backwards, too.
The same thing happens here when dI dt 0 - the far zone EM radiation fields are produced
(i.e. real photons) while dI dt 0 and carry away linear momentum, and since dI dt 0 ,
a net force imbalance on the radiating object! (n.b. e.g. by linear momentum conservation, a
laser pen has a recoil force acting on it from emitting the laser radiation a radiation back reaction)
Likewise, the net hidden time rate of change of relativistic angular momentum is:
tot
rel t
dLtot dprel t 1 dm t
r 2 Eo r x
dt dt c dt
Which will also not be exactly cancelled either, for the same reason the EM radiation field can
/ will carry away angular momentum
dLtot
In reality, in order to calculate rel
t , we need to go back
dt
and integrate infinitesimal contributions along the (short)
segments of upper and lower / top and bottom segments of the
loop because r p rp sin , between r and p .
dp dp
Same for r r sin .
dt dt
dp d d 1 1
Frel u mu mu where: u
dt dt dt 1 u c 2 1 u c
2
du 1 du
2u du
dt 1 c2 dt
Frel m u 3 where:
a = ordinary acceleration.
1 u c 2
dt
2
1 u c
2 2
m u u a m u u a
Frel a 2 a 2 Q.E.D.
1 u c
2
c 1 u c
2
1 u c
2
c u 2
Griffiths Problem 12.38: Proper Acceleration
We define the proper four-vector acceleration in the obvious way, as:
d d 2 x 0 dx
d
d 2
, where:
d
0 , u c, u u = proper four-velocity
a.) Find 0 and in terms of u and a ( = ordinary velocity, ordinary acceleration):
d 0 d 0 dt 1 d c since: d 1 dt dt 1
0
d dt d 1 u c dt 1 u c u d
u
1 u c
2 2 2
1 1
2 c 2 2 u a 1
c u a du
0
where: a
3
1 u c
2 c 1 u c 2 2 dt
1 u c
2 2
Similarly:
d d dt 1 d u since: u and: 1
d dt d 1 u c dt 1 u c
u u
1 u c
2 2 2
1 1
2 u a
1 a 2 c 2
u
3
1 u c 1 u c
2 2
1 u c
2 2
1 u u a Frel
a 2 see Problem 12.36 above.
1 u c 2
c u 2 u m
b.) Express in terms of u and a :
2
u a
2
2
0 2 1
1
1
a 1 u c c 2 u u a
2
4 2 4
c 1 u c 2 1 u c
1 1 2
2
2 1 2
2
2 u a a 1 u c 1 u c u a 4 u 2 u a
2 2
2
1 u c 2 4 2
c c c
2 u a u u
2
2 2
1
2
a 1 u c
2
1 2 2
1 u c
2 4
c2 c c
2
1 u a
Or:
a 2
2
n.b. Lorentz-invariant quantity same in all IRFs.
1 u c 2 4
c u 2
c.) Show 0 .
Recall that the dot-product of any two relativistic four-vectors is a Lorentz-invariant quantity.
Thus, if we deliberately/consciously choose to evaluate 0 in the rest
2
frame of an object, where 0 , 0 , 1 and 0 c , then:
0
0 c 2 = constant.
2 2
d
Note that is also the dot-product of two relativistic four vectors { and }.
d
d d d
Note also that:
d
d
2
d
d d
But: c = constant (from above). Thus:
2
d
c 2 0
d
0 .
dp
d.) Write the Minkowski / proper force version of Newtons 2 law, K in terms of the nd
d
proper acceleration .
dp d d
K
d
d
m m
d
m
K 0