Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
SHATTERED HOPE
A short film about principle of totality
The short film evolves about Yvette B., a promising athlete, an excellent professional
swimmer of her generation, a lady with passion and burning desire for her dream to be qualified
in the Olympics and become a world champion. She is a hardworking athlete, an outstanding one.
She would train herself every now and then to be the best. And yes, she is; always number one
in every swimming competition she joins. But in just a blink of an eye, her world turned upside
down as she experienced pain on one of her leg for days, and for months until it was hard for her
to train. She then decided to consult a doctor. She underwent different diagnostic and laboratory
tests. From there, she found out that she has tumor on her right leg. She was diagnosed with
peripheral arterial disease secondary to stage 2 periosteal sarcoma. She has cancer. The doctor
gave him two options, its either to amputate the affected leg or to undergo chemotherapy so as
to stop the spread of the tumor to other parts of her body. The former treatment was highly
chemotherapy would be chosen. Upon hearing the bad news, her world turned into darkness as
she realized her dreams and hopes would shatter. From that day on, her days became gloomy
not knowing what to do, what decision to make. If she has her leg amputated, she knew that it
means shell stop chasing for her dream. It would be over for her. She refused the treatment.
The orthopaedic surgeon, oncologist, pathologist, and radiologist talked about her case. Dr.
Amancio and Dr. Cacao, the orthopaedic surgeon and oncologist respectively, suggest that the
primary treatment for YBs case are chemotherapy and amputation. They also insisted that their
patient should undergo an aggressive treatment which is amputation since the cancer cells could
spread and metastasize leading to her death. The principle of totality was tackled and
emphasized by Dr. Amancio. The principle of totality states that all decisions in medical ethics
must prioritize the good of the entire person. All the the organs and other parts of the body exist
for the sake of the whole person. Dr. Amancio pointed out that the purpose of the part is to serve
the whole and any action that damages a part of the body or prevents it from fulfilling its purpose
violated the natural order and is morally wrong. However, a single part may be sacrificed if the
loss is necessary for the good of the whole person. Although there are a lot of consequences in
amputating her leg it is a better medical choice in order to remove the cancer and for her to live
longer. Dr. Armamento and Dr. Baoas, the pathologist and radiologist respectively, disagrees with
the former doctors suggestion. They insisted that amputation is not the best option since YB is
a swimmer and her career will be compromised if amputation will push through. They considered
the autonomy of the patient which requires YBs decision-making process that must be free of
coercion and coaxing. Dr. Baoas suggested to have YB consult again by Dr. Amancio to present to
her that the primary treatment for her case is amputation but YB didnt approve for such
aggressive treatment. Dr. Amancio told her to come back if YB change her mind.
As YB was training for her incoming tournament, her coach noticed that she couldnt swim
well and was not in the right form and physique. Thats the time when she decided to go back to