Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Step 1: Cup
Slit-lamp measurements of the vertical and horizontal cup-to-disc ratios should be determined.
Asymmetry of 0.2 or more between the two optic nerves raises suspicion for possible glaucoma.
Care must be taken to note whether the cup was identified by change in color or contour (see
Step 2). Visibility of lamina cribosa fenestrations in the cup is known as the laminar dot sign.
Step 2: Color
The pallor associated with glaucomatous changes in the cup chronologically follows the thinning
of the neuroretinal rim and its color. Therefore, close attention should be given to the areas
where vessels appear to be kinking in addition to that of pallor as the former would more
accurate in identifying the cup. This discrepancy between the cup and pallor becomes more
apparent when saucerization is present. Saucerization occurs when a shallow cup leads to the cup
margin with the remaining central pallor intact.
Step 3: Contour
The contour of the neuroretinal rim may reveal subtle features consistent with glaucomatous
change. Focal notching, or thinning, of the neuroretinal rim may exist. This occurs
particularly after resolution of splinter hemorrhages. Focal notching will lead to localized loss of
retinal nerve fiber that can be demonstrated using the red-free filter on the slit-lamp or be directly
measured for with ancillary testing such as the GDx. This loss in the retinal nerve fiber may
proceed changes in the optic nerve located if discovered early in the disease process. Eventual
progression of focal notching leads to a sharpened rim where sections of the neuroretinal rim are
virtually non-existent. In contrast to these localized areas, concentric atrophy results in a
generalized loss of tissue. Besides glaucoma, normal age-related changes in the retinal nerve
fiber do occur and can mimic similar atrophy.
Variability in Examination
Examination of the optic nerve demonstrates both interobserver and intraobserver variability.
Interobserver Variability. Interobserver variability occurs when two or more observes vary in
their evaluation on one common entity. When evaluating the optic nerve (and the progression of
glaucoma), different clinicians will give varying measurements in their examination. This leads
to different examination and ultimately practice patterns as these subjective parameters are used
in clincial decision making.
Intraobserver Variability. Intraobserver variability arises from the variation of evaluation from
one observer about the same entity. Similarly to interobserver variability, intraobserver
variability when evaluating the optic nerve results in different assessments of glaucomatous
nerves even though the judgement comes from the same observer. These varying assessments of
the optic nerve result in different practice patterns as clinicial decisions are based on these
findings.
Conclusion
Repetition and adherence to these (or similar steps) can dramatically aid any ophthalmologist.
This is especially important when facing the common dilemma of diagnosing glaucoma or
monitoring its progression in cases that are not obvious.
(Optic Nerve Photos: Courtesy of Sarwat Salim, MD,FACS, University of Tennessee and
George Spaeth, MD, Wills Eye Hospital)