Under any of said three (3) general grounds are the specific grounds, but not limited to the following: 1) That the question is misleading; 2) leading 3) confusing: 4) vague; 5) ambiguous; 6) not intelligible; 7) has no basis; 6) assumes facts not in evidence; 9) asked beyond the scope of the preceding examination; 10) lacks the foundation; 11) lacks of authentication; 12) calls for a conclusion; 13) speculative; 14) calls for a cumulative evidence; 15) compound; 16) multiple; 17) calls for the same answer; 18) repetitive or already answered: 19) misstates evidence; 20) misquotes witness; 21) seif- incriminating; 22) improper impeachment; 23) argumentative; 24) that the answer to the question is not responsive; 25) exhibit presented is excluded by the rules; 26) a fruit of a po'sonous tree; 27) covered by the privileged communication, 28) violates the best evidence rule; 29) violates the parole evidence rule; 30) the document for authentication by a witness shows no required stamp affixed thereon [Del Rosario vs. Judge Hamoy, G.R. No. 77154, June 30, 1986}; 31) the document presented has no signature; 32) the witness’ answer is hearsay; 33) testimony has no probative value, or no bearing on factual and legal issues; and 34) the witness’ testimony is narrative [But this may be allowed by the court in the interest of justice. [PP v. Cafete, GR. No.142930, March 28, 2003, CDSCD, pp. 72-73}.Court Interpreter (Calling said civil case) SPS. NOEL and NORMA 6. GA, Plaintiff, -versus- SPS. MAR and ROSITA S. TAN, Defendants, Civil Case No. 2074 for: RECOVERY OF POSSESSION. This is for initial presentation of defendants’ evidence, your honor. COURT Atty. Rey T. Zales Atty. Arci D. Solis Court Interpreter Atty. Arci D. Solis COURT Atty. Arci D. Solis Q-1 Appearances? Appearing for the plaintiff, your honor. We are ready to receive defendants’ evidence. We are ready to present our first witness in the person of Flor B. Moral, your honor. (Swearing in and qualifying the witness) Witness is now ready for direct examination, sir. (Manifesting) The testimony of this witness is being offered to prove that she knows both the complainants and the defendants in this case; that she executed her judicial affidavit in connection with this case; that all her statements therein are true and correct to the bestof her own knowledge and_ information: and, to testify on all other relevant matters, your honor. Proceed (Conducting the direct exam.) Madame witness, attached to the records is a judicial affidavit allegedly executed by a certain Fe B. Moral, who is this affiant? It's me, sir.Q-2 Above the printed name, Fe B. Moral, there is a signature, whose signature is this? A That is my signature, sir. Q-3 To whom did you subscribed this judicial affidavit? A Before you and at your law office, sir. Q-4 Whose signature above the name, ATTY. ARCI D. SOLIS? A It is your signature, sir Q-5 Are you sure? A Yes, sir. You signed it in my presence. Q-6 Your statements in this affidavit are all true and correct? A Yes, sir. Atty. Arci D. Solis (Manifesting) Your honor please, pursuant to the previous agreement of the parties, may | request that this judicial affidavit be considered as the direct testimony of my witness and that this be marked as Exhibit "1"; second page be marked as Exh. “1-A”; the signature of Fe B. Moral be encircled and marked as Exh. “1-A-1"; the signature of Notary Public, Atty. Arci D. Solis, be encircled and marked as Exh. "1-A-2". We have done our direct examination, and our witness is ready for cross, your honor.