UG - Tier II - Evaluation Report

AnnexureII
PREVISITEVALUATIONREPORT
<<INSTITUTENAME>>
<<PROGRAMME>>
<<VISITDATE>>

Forallaccreditationcriteria,thefindingsshallbeYCompliance,CConcern,WWeaknessandD
Deficiency.Nocellsaretobeleftblank.JustificationisrequiredforCConcern,WWeaknessand
DDeficiency.Pleaseprovidethejustificationbelowthetable.
Criteria Compliance Observationandremarks

forNonCompliance
Crirterion1:Vision,MissionandProgrammeEducational
Objectives
Vision of the institute and department should be futuristic
and the mission helps to achieve.
Defined PEOs must reflect the career and professional
accomplishmentsofthegraduatesandalsomeasurable
ProgramCurriculumandotherattributesmustcontributetothe
achievementofstatedPEOs.
Administrative system must help in the assessment and
attainmentofPEOs.
Assessment tools and processes must be appropriate and
sufficientformeasuringtheattainmentofPEOs.
Thequestionsinthesurveyquestionnairesmustelicitrequired
information from the stakeholders to measure the attainment
ofPEOs.
List the identified documents/evidences which are to be
verifiedforevaluatingtheattainmentofPEOs.
Criterion2:ProgrammeOutcomes
DefinedPOsmustaddressalltheGAsofNBA.
Established correlations among PEOs, POs and COs must be
appropriateandmeaningful.
EachPOshouldbeaddressedbyoneormorecourseoutcomes.
Adaptedcontentdeliverymethodsmustcontributeinachieving
COs.
Courseassessmenttoolsandmechanismsmustbeappropriate
formeasuringtheattainmentofCOs.
Curriculum improvements brought in must be significant for
improvingtheattainmentofPOs.
List the identified documents/evidences which are to be
verifiedforevaluatingtheattainmentofPOs.
Criterion3:ProgrammeCurriculum
The programme curriculum must satisfy the program specific
criteriaconsidered.
The curricular components must contribute to the attainment
ofarticulatedPEOsandPOs.
Curriculum design and development process must fulfill the
requirementsofstakeholders.
IndustryinstituteinteractionmustfacilitateinachievingPOs.
Criterion4:StudentPerformance
Numberofstudentsadmittedagainsttheapprovedintakeover
the3academicyearsmustbeeithermaximumorincreasing.
Placement/higher studies information provided must be
ConsistentwithSI&API?
Statedprofessionalactivitiesmustbeappropriateandsufficient
inachievingPEOsandPOs.
List the documents to be verified to assess the programmes
claimvisavisinplacementandhigherstudies.
Listthedocuments/evidencestobeverifiedforconfirmingthe
entriesmadeinSIandAPI?
Criterion5:FacultyContributions
Observations made on STR, FQI, Faculty Cadre Ratio, FRP,
Faculty interactions outside world, and patents filed must
complywiththeprogrammerequirements.
Programmeunderaccreditationmusthavefacultycompetency
statedinSAR.
Faculty publications must be located in internet with
DOI/PublisherandreflectingtheentriesmadeinFRP.
ListthedocumentstobeverifiedtoensuretheentriesforSTR,
FCR,FQI,FRPI,FRP,FIPR&FIP?
Criterion6:FacilitiesandTechnicalSupport
Lecture hall, tutorial halls, seminar halls and laboratory etc.,
statedmustsatisfytheprogrammerequirements.
Programmemusthavequalifiedandadequatetechnicalstaffto
conductthelaboratorycourses.
Criterion7:AcademicSupportandTeachingandLearningprocess
Numberoffacultyandtheirqualificationsmustbeadequateto
handle the first year courses of all programs offered by the
institute.
Laboratories listed in the SAR for first year courses of the
instituteincludinglanguagelaboratorymustbesufficient.
TeachingLearningprocessadoptedinFirstyearcoursesasper
SARmustmeettheoutcomebasededucation.
Criterion8:Governance,InstitutionalSupportandFinancial
Resources
Campus infrastructure, administrative setup, etc., must be as
pertheprogrammerequirements.
Budget allocation must be adequate to run the programmes
offeredbytheinstitute.
Listthedocuments/evidencestobeverifiedforconfirmingthe
entriesmadeinSAR
Criterion9:ContinuousImprovement
Newlycreatedfacilitiesintheprogrammustcontributetowards
attainmentofPEOs/POs.
Overall improvements made for the programme since last
accreditationmustbesignificant.
AnnexureIII
CHAIRPERSONEXECUTIVESUMMARY
<<INSTITUTENAME>>
<<PROGRAMME>>
<<VISITDATE>>
1.OVERVIEW
1.1VisitofInformation
The visiting team of National Board of Accreditation (NBA) conducted a three day
accreditation visit to <insert name of institution/university>, to evaluate <number > programmes
from_____to______.
Duringthevisit,thevisitingteammetwithHeadoftheInstitution/Dean.The
briefingontheinstitutionwasgivenbyandonprogrammesweregivenbythe
respective Head of the Departments/Programme Coordinators. The respective programme
evaluatorsalsovisitedthevariousfacilitiesoftheprogrammes.Apartfromcomprehensivereviewof
documental evidences pertaining to various accreditation criteria, the visiting team also held
meetingsandinterviewswithallthestakeholderssuchasfaculty,staffmembers,alumni,employers,
parentsandstudents.
ThevisitingteamofNBAcomprised:
VisitingTeamChairperson <name,affiliation,contactinformation>
<programmetitlewithabbreviation>
ProgrammeEvaluator1 <name,affiliation,contactinformation>
1.2PreviousAccreditationDetails
Programmetitle Firstaccredited Lastaccredited
Numberof Witheffect Numberof Witheffect
years/Grade from years/Grade from

1.3InstitutionalInformation
NameoftheInstitution/University
Address
YearofEstablishment
NameofHeadoftheInstitution/Dean
NumberofDepartments/Faculties
NumberofUndergraduateProgrammes
NumberofPostgraduateProgrammes
Ph.Ddegreeprogrammesoffering,ifapplicable Yes/no
IntakeDetails:UG/PG/Ph.D
NumberofTeachingfaculty
Numberofsupportingstaff
AnySpecialrecognitione.g:aprominentpublicresearch
center,strongindustryinvolvement
1.4Summaryoffindings
ProgrammeTitle1<Nameoftheprogramme>
Strength:
Concern:
Weakness:
Deficiency:
Strength:
Concern:
Weakness:
Deficiency:
Strength:
Concern:
Weakness:
Deficiency:
Strength:
Concern:
Weakness:
Deficiency:
Strength:
Concern:
Weakness:
Deficiency:
SignatureoftheChairperson

AnnexureIV
CHAIRPERSONREPORT
<<INSTITUTENAME>>
<<PROGRAMME>>
<<VISITDATE>>

Forallaccreditationcriteria,thefindingsshallbeYCompliance,CConcern,WWeaknessandD
Deficiency.Nocellsaretobeleftblank.JustificationisrequiredforCConcern,WWeaknessandDDeficiency.
Pleaseprovidethejustificationbelowthetable.
ProgrammeTitle<NameoftheProgramme>
ProgrammeEvaluator ProgrammeEvaluator
1 2
andremarks
Observation
Observation
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
remarksfor
Criteria
forNon
Non
and
Objectives
The published PEOs should reflect the professional and
career accomplishments of graduates and be in line with
the mission
Administrative system should be in place to monitor the
processofattainingPEOs
Thereshouldbedocumentedprocesstoassesstheattainment
ofPEOs
Published PEOs must be achieved through the attainment of
POs
There must be a documented and effective process for the
periodicreviewandrevisionofthesePEOs
CommentsoftheChairperson
1 2
andremarks
Observation
Observation
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
remarksfor
Criteria
forNon
Non
and
There mustbeadocumented processinplaceto measurethe
attainmentofdefinedPOs
ThedefinedCOsmustcontributetotheattainmentofPOs
Attainment of defined POs with respect to the Graduate
Attributes(GAs)ofNBA
1.EngineeringKnowledge
2.ProblemAnalysis
3.Design/developmentofsolutions
4.Conductinvestigationsofcomplexproblems
5.Moderntoolusage
6.Theengineerandsociety
7.Environmentandsustainability
8.Ethics
9.Individualandteamwork
10.Communication
11.Projectmanagementandfinance
12.Lifelonglearning
Appropriate content delivery and assessment methods/tools
shouldbeemployedinattainmentofPOs
Curricular delivery and assessment methods should be
amendedbasedontheattainmentofPOs
EachPOmustcontributesignificantlytoachieveatleastoneof
thePEOs
periodicreviewandrevisionsofthesePOs
1 2
andremarks
Observation
Observation
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
remarksfor
Criteria
forNon
Non
and
The structured curriculum must address programme specific
criteria
Components of the curriculum must sufficiently address these
definedPOs/COs
Outcomes of the core engineering courses must help the
graduate to acquire the professional competence, knowledge
andskills.
The process must have the feature of justifying the
requirements for improvement in courses, curriculum, content
deliveryandassessmentmethods
The programme must have the participation/involvement of
relevantindustriesincontentdeliveryandcurriculumdesign.
1 2
andremarks
Observation
Observation
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
remarksfor
Criteria
forNon
Non
and
Success rate, Academic performance, Placement and Higher
Studies and Professional activities which include
entrepreneurship initiative, product design, innovations etc.,
mustbeinconsistentwithattainedPOsandPEOs.
1 2
andremarks
Observation
Observation
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
remarksfor
Criteria
forNon
Non
and
Faculty strength, qualification, cadre and competencies must
helpthegraduatestoattainthedefinedCOsandPOs
Research activities of faculty including consultancy and
knowledgetransfermustcontributeforbettercontentdelivery
andprojectworktowardstheattainmentofCOsandPOs
1 2
andremarks
Observation
Observation
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
remarksfor
Criteria
forNon
Non
and
Facilities provided to faculty and students including teaching
aids, lecture halls, faculty rooms, engineering laboratories,
equipment etc. and competent technical staff must be helpful
to enhance and innovate the teaching learning process
towardstheattainmentofPOs
1 2
andremarks
Observation
Observation
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
remarksfor
Criteria
forNon
Non
and
Criterion7:AcademicSupportandTeachingandLearningprocess
Academic support units such as basic science/engineering
laboratories, language laboratory, etc., must fulfill the
perquisiteofcoreandoptionalengineeringcourses
Teaching learning process including tutorial classes, mentoring
system, feedback analysis, scope for selflearning, career
guidance etc., must be functionally in place to impart
knowledgeandinculcateskillsandattitudesinrelationtobasic
science,mathematicsandengineering.
1 2
andremarks
Observation
Observation
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
remarksfor
Criteria
forNon
Non
and
Resources
Campus Infrastructure and other related facilities as library,
internet, safety equipments, counselling and emergency
medical care facilities must satisfy the requirements of the
programme
Budget allocated and utilized must be adequate to run the
programmeandauditedstatementsmustbemadeavailablefor
stakeholders
Governing body, functional administrative structure, policies
and procedures, decentralization of power, delegation of
financial power, grievance redressal mechanism etc., must
satisfy the requirements/norms of concerned regulatory
authoritiesandhelpfultoprogresstowardsvision.
1 2
andremarks
Observation
Observation
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
remarksfor
Criteria
forNon
Non
and
Improvements/attainments in SI, API, STR, FQI, FRP etc., must
beappreciable
Effortsmadebythefacultytowardscontinuingeducation,new
facility created and overcoming the shortcomings listed during
the last accreditation/since the inception of the programme
mustbeevident
AnnexureV
PROGRAMMEEVALUATORSUMMARY
<<INSTITUTENAME>>
<<PROGRAMME>>
<<VISITDATE>>

1.OVERRVIEW
The visiting team of National Board of Accreditation (NBA) conducted a three day
accreditationvisitto<insertnameofinstitution/university>,toevaluateUG programme <nameof
theprogramme>from_____to______.Theprogrammeof<nameoftheprogramme>offeredin
. A Day 0 meeting was held on at to exchange of findings among
evaluationteammembers,basedonreviewofSelfAssessmentReport(SAR)submittedby
andtheprevisitevaluationreports.DuringtheDay0meeting,alistofquerieswasconsolidatedto
seek further clarification and understanding on the programme in addition to the discussion of
identifiedcommonissuestoallprogrammes.
Duringthevisit,thevisitingteammetwithHeadoftheInstitution/DeanThe
briefingontheinstitutionwasgivenbyandontheprogrammewasgivenbythe
respectiveHeadoftheDepartment/ProgrammeCoordinator.Therespectiveprogrammeevaluators
alsovisitedthevariousfacilities,,oftheprogramme.Apartfromcomprehensivereviewof
documental evidences pertaining to various accreditation criteria, the visiting team also held
meetingandinterviewswithallthestakeholderssuchasfaculty,staffmembers,alumni,employers,
parentsandstudents.
TheProgrammeEvaluationTeamfoundanumberofdeficiencies,relatedprimarilytonon
compliancewithcriteria,and.Further,therearesignificantweaknessesin
criteria,and.
2.GENERALINFORMATION
The<nameoftheprogramme>wasfirststartedinTheprogrammeisofferedas
afulltimeprogrammeforfouryearsdurationforapplicantswithqualification.The
totalnumberofstudentsintheprogrammeis.Thetotalnumberoffacultymemberswith
theprogrammeis.Theprogrammeis
3.GENERALOBSERVATIONS
Criterion1:Vision,MissionandProgrammeEducationalObjectives
The<nameoftheinstitution>andthe<nameofthedepartment/school>havewell
definedvisionandmissionstatements.Thedefinedvisionstatementsarefuturisticandaspirational
and mission statements are the means of attaining the vision. The PEOs are reflecting the
professionalandcareeraccomplishmentsofthegraduatesafter4to5yearsofgraduationandalso
they are contributing to achieve the vision and mission of the department. Moreover, these PEOs
addresstheneedsoftheprogrammestakeholders.
There is no welldefined process and support administrative setup for assessment and
evaluationofPEOs.Therewasnoevidenceofassessmentandevaluationprocessforassessmentof
attainmentofPEOs.Therearenoformalmechanismsinplacetoreceivefeedbacksfrompracticing
engineers and local industry for evaluating the attainment of PEO. There is no department level
industryadvisorycommitteefortheprogrammeoffered.
The broad curriculum components of the programme are not sufficient to support the
achievementofPEOs.ThereisnoprocessforreviewingandredefiningofthePEOs.
ThemajorshortcomingsisassessmentandEvaluationofPEOsisnotthere.
EvaluationofCriterion1isaprimecriterionforoutcomebasedaccreditationprocess.The
programmeevaluationteamfoundadeficiencyintheachievementofthiscriterion.

Programme Outcomes are well defined and they are in line with the NBA graduate
attributes.AllthePOsarehelpfultoachievethePEOs.AllCourseOutcomesarewritteninhigher
order blooms taxonomy. These COs are sufficient enough to achieve the Programme Outcomes.
The methods of delivery of the courses are not suitable to achieve Course Outcomes as well as
Programme Outcomes. There is large gap between the theory and laboratory work. Student
projectsarenotsuitablefortheattainmentofPOs.Thequalityoflaboratoryexperimentsispoor.
There was no effective mechanism to assess the attainment of COs and also the
documented processvisvistheresultsofattainmentofeachPOwasnot properlyillustrated.
ThefacultyinterviewedduringtheaccreditationvisitwasignorantoftheconceptofCOsandPOs.
Thecourseassessmenttoolsandmechanismsarenotappropriateformeasuringtheattainmentof
COs.
Themajorshortcomingsarei)AssessmentandEvaluationisnotthereandii)Deliveryisof
coursesisnotsatisfactory
The programme evaluation team determined that the programme has a
deficiency/weaknessindemonstratingtheachievementofthiscriterion.

The curriculum is developed <name of the programme> satisfies the applicable program
criteria specified by < Professional society>. The curriculum documentation is satisfactory with all
theinformationlikeprerequisitesetc.
Studentsarerequiredtocompleteunitsofcreditforgraduation.Eachcoursecarries
credit units.Thefinal yearproject carries creditunits. Credit exemptionisfour.Thetotal
numberofcreditsallocatedforlaboratoryare(distributionoftheoryandlaboratoryinterms
ofpercentage).
Coreengineeringsubjectsandtheirrelevancetoprogrammeoutcomesarewellillustrated.
Therewerelittleevidencesprovidedtodemonstratetheindustrysparticipationintheprogramme.
There was no documented evidence of continuous improvement of courses and curriculum. The
statedindustryinstituteinteractionisnotfacilitatinginachievingPOs.
The major shortcomings are i) The curriculum components are not suitable for the
attainment of PEOs ii) No industry involvement is in the curriculum design, iii) The content is not
sufficient in some of the courses for the attainment of POs and iv) The design experience is not
sufficientforattainingtheProgramOutcomesbandc.
The programme evaluation team determined that the programme has a
deficiency/weaknessindemonstratingtheachievementofthiscriterion.
Criterion4:StudentsPerformance
Student input quality is good and consistent. The success rate of students and academic
performancearegood.
Theplacementandhigherstudiesinformationprovidedarenotreflectingtheattainmentof
POs. There is no proper document to assess the genuine of the programmes claim visvis in
placementandhigherstudies.
Theinvolvementofstudentsinprofessionalactivitiesisnotsufficientfortheattainmentof
some of the POs defined. The student publications and organization of technical events are also
average.Thereisnostudentmagazine/newsletterinthedepartmentfordisseminationofvarious
activities in the department. No innovative product designs/ Projects and entrepreneurship
initiativesareevidentbythestudentsinthedepartment.
The major shortcomings are i) Poor placement and higher studies record and ii) No
innovativeproductdesign.
Thefacultycompetenciesarenotcorrelatingtoprogrammespecificcriteriadefined.ButSTR
isaspertheAICTEnorms.FacultycadreratioisnotaspertheAICTEnorms.Facultyqualificationsare
average. Faculty participations in faculty development and training activities are poor. Faculty
retentionisaverage.NoIPRsandnofundedR&Dprojects.Facultyinteractionwithoutsideworldis
poor.
Themajorshortcomingsarei)CompetenciesoffacultyarenotsuitabletoPSCandii)Poor
R&D
Lecture halls, tutorial halls, seminar halls, laboratories and other teaching facilities are
generallyadequatetosupportthebasicneedsoftheprogramme.However,thecollectionofbooks
and reference materials in the department library is good. Laboratory facility may be further
improvedandtoallowmoreaccessibilitytostudents.
It is noted that inadequate qualified technical supporting staff are there for program
specificlaboratories.
The major shortcomings are i) Laboratory facilities needs improvement and ii) Inadequate
qualifiedtechnicalstaff
Criterion7:AcademicSupportUnitsandTeachingLearningProcess
The number of faculty members and their qualifications are adequate to handle the first
yearcoursesofallprogrammesofferedbytheinstitute.Thelaboratoryfacilitiesforfirstyearcourses
oftheinstitutearesufficient.However,thelanguagelaboratorymayfurtherbeimproved.
There is no scope for selflearning in the teaching learning process adopted in first year
courses. The provision for tutorial classes is not in time table. There is no evidence of feedback
mechanismandremedialclasses.Thecentralcomputingfacilitiesneedimprovement.
Themajorshortcomingsarei)Feedbackmechanismisnotthere,ii)Remedialclassesarenot
conductedforweakstudentsandiii)QualityofFirstyearlabexperimentsispoor
Criterion8:Governance,InstitutionalSupportandFinancialResources
Allcommitteesareconstitutedasperthestatutorybodiesregulations. Institutional
supportsystemisadequatefortheprogramme.Thefinancialresourcestosupporttheprogramand
departmentaresufficient.Butthereisnopropermechanismintheinstitutionforbudgetproposal,
approvalandprocurement.
ThemajorshortcomingsisPoorbudgetplanningmechanism

The improvement in the success index, academic performance and STR is good. But
improvementinfacultyqualificationindexisaverage.NoimprovementisseeninR&D.Continuing
educationactivitiesareveryless.
ThenewlycreatedfacilitiesintheprogrammearenotcontributingtoattainofPOs.
Overallimprovementsmadefortheprogrammesincelastaccreditationarepoor.
The major shortcomings are i) No improvement in the faculty qualifications and ii) R&D
improvementispoor
4.AREASFORIMPROVEMENTS
a)PEOandPOassessmentandevaluationprocessneedtobedefinedandimplemented
b)ContinuousimprovementbasedontheassessmentofPEOs,POsandCOs
c)Feedbackandfollowupactionmechanismneedimproveteachingandlearning
d)Usemodernteachingaids
e)Coursedeliveryneedsimprovement
5.ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
TheNBAEvaluationTeamwouldliketothank<nameoftheinstitute>fortheircooperation
forsmoothconductingofevaluation.
6.PROGRAMMEEVALUATIONFORM
TheobservationsoftheNBAEvaluationTeamforconsiderationoftheProgrammerelating
tovariouscriteriaarecontainedinAppendix1:ProgrammeEvaluationworksheetAandAppendix
2:ProgrammeEvaluationworksheetB
AnnexureVI
PROGRAMMEEVALUATIONWORKSHEETPARTA
Institution
Nameofinstitution/university
Nameofaffiliatinguniversity
(ifapplicable)
AddresswithPhoneandemail
Programmeforaccreditation
Nameoftheprogramme
(asitappearsongraduatescertificate)
AbbreviationofProgramme
NameoftheDepartment/School
Yearofstartingoftheprogramme
Expirydateoflastaccreditation
(ifapplicable)
EvaluationTeam
Name,designationandaffiliationofVisitingTeamChairperson
Name,designationandaffiliationofProgrammeEvaluator1
Name,designationandaffiliationofProgrammeEvaluator2
DatesofthepresentAccreditationVisit
Forallaccreditationcriteria,thefindingsshallbeYCompliance,CConcern,WWeaknessandDDeficiency.Nocellsaretobeleftblank.Justificationis
requiredforCConcern,WWeaknessandDDeficiency.Pleaseprovidethejustificationbelowthetable.
Criteria Compliance ObservationandremarksforNonCompliance

Objectives
The published PEOs should reflect the professional and
career accomplishments of graduates and be in line with
the mission
Administrative system should be in place to monitor the
processofattainingPEOs
Thereshouldbedocumentedprocesstoassesstheattainment
ofPEOs
Published PEOs must be achieved through the attainment of
POs
periodicreviewandrevisionofthesePEOs
There mustbeadocumented processinplaceto measurethe
attainmentofdefinedPOs
ThedefinedCOsmustcontributetotheattainmentofPOs

Attainment of defined POs with respect to the Graduate
Attributes(GAs)ofNBA
1.EngineeringKnowledge
2.ProblemAnalysis

3.Design/developmentofsolutions

4.Conductinvestigationsofcomplexproblems

5.Moderntoolusage

6.Theengineerandsociety

7.Environmentandsustainability

8.Ethics

9.Individualandteamwork

10.Communication

11.Projectmanagementandfinance

12.Lifelonglearning

Appropriate content delivery and assessment methods/tools
shouldbeemployedinattainmentofPOs
Curricular delivery and assessment methods should be
amendedbasedontheattainmentofPOs
EachPOmustcontributesignificantlytoachieveatleastoneof
thePEOs
periodicreviewandrevisionsofthesePOs
The structured curriculum must address programme specific
criteria
Components of the curriculum must sufficiently address these
definedPOs/COs
Outcomes of the core engineering courses must help the
graduate to acquire the professional competence, knowledge
andskills.
The process must have the feature of justifying the
requirements for improvement in courses, curriculum, content
deliveryandassessmentmethods
The programme must have the participation/involvement of
relevantindustriesincontentdeliveryandcurriculumdesign.
Success rate, Academic performance, Placement and Higher
Studies and Professional activities which include
entrepreneurship initiative, product design, innovations etc.,
mustbeinconsistentwithattainedPOsandPEOs.
Faculty strength, qualification, cadre and competencies must
helpthegraduatestoattainthedefinedCOsandPOs
Research activities of faculty including consultancy and
knowledgetransfermustcontributeforbettercontentdelivery
andprojectworktowardstheattainmentofCOsandPOs
Facilities provided to faculty and students including teaching
aids, lecture halls, faculty rooms, engineering laboratories,
equipment etc. and competent technical staff must be helpful
to enhance and innovate the teaching learning process
towardstheattainmentofPOs
Criterion7:AcademicSupportandTeachingandLearning
process
Academic support units such as basic science/engineering
laboratories, language laboratory, etc., must fulfill the
perquisiteofcoreandoptionalengineeringcourses
Teaching learning process including tutorial classes, mentoring
system, feedback analysis, scope for selflearning, career
guidance etc., must be functionally in place to impart
knowledgeandinculcateskillsandattitudesinrelationtobasic
science,mathematicsandengineering.
Resources
Campus Infrastructure and other related facilities as library,
internet, safety equipments, counseling and emergency
medical care facilities must satisfy the requirements of the
programme
Budget allocated and utilized must be adequate to run the
programmeandauditedstatementsmustbemadeavailablefor
stakeholders
Governing body, functional administrative structure, policies
and procedures, decentralization of power, delegation of
financial power, grievance redressal mechanism etc., must
satisfy the requirements/norms of concerned regulatory
authoritiesandhelpfultoprogresstowardsvision.
Improvements/attainments in SI, API, STR, FQI, FRP etc., must
beappreciable
Effortsmadebythefacultytowardscontinuingeducation,new
facility created and overcoming the shortcomings listed during
the last accreditation/since the inception of the programme
mustbeevident.
PROGRAMMEEVALUATIONWORKSHEETB
ProgrammeName:_______________________________
Forallaccreditationcriteria,thefindingsshallbeYCompliance,CConcern,WWeaknessandDDeficiency.Nocellsaretobeleftblank.Justificationis
requiredforCConcern,WWeaknessandDDeficiency.Pleaseprovidethejustificationbelowthetable.
Points Compliance NonCompliance
Weakness
Briefstatementdetailingevidenceusedto
Deficiency
Without
concern
concern
Awarded
Points
Points
With
Max.
No. Criteria determine
C,WorD
1.1 MissionandVision 5 <overalllevelofcompliancefor

subcriterion1.1>
1.1.1VisionandMissionstatementsofthe 1
InstituteandDepartment
1.1.2PublishingandDisseminationofVisionand 2
Missionstatements
1.1.3ProcessfordefiningVisionandMissionof 2
thedepartment
1.2 ProgrammeEducationalObjectives 15 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
subcriterion1.2>
1.2.1DescriptionofPEOs 2
1.2.2PublishingandDisseminationofPEOs 2
1.2.3Stakeholdersoftheprogrammeandtheir 1
relevance
1.2.4ProcessforestablishingthePEOs 5
1.2.5ConsistencyofPEOswithMission 5
1.3 AttainmentofProgrammeEducational 20 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
Objectives subcriterion1.3>
1.3.1Justificationsforcontributionsof 10
programmecurriculumtowardsattainmentof
PEOs
1.3.2Administrativesystemhelpsinensuringthe 10
attainmentofthePEOs
1.4 AssessmentofattainmentofProgramme 25 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
EducationalObjectives subcriterion1.4>
1.4.1ToolsandProcessesusedinassessmentof 10
theattainmentofthePEOs
1.4.2EvidencesfortheattainmentofthePEOs 15
1.5 ResultsofassessmentofachievementofPEOs 10 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
usedforredefiningPEOs subcriterion1.5>
Weakness
Briefstatementdetailingevidenceused
Deficiency
Without
concern
concern
Points
Points
Max.
With
No. Criteria todetermine
C,WorD
2.1 DefinitionandValidationofCourseOutcomesand 25 <overalllevelofcompliancefor

ProgrammeOutcomes subcriterion2.1>
2.1.1ListCOsandPOs 2
2.1.2PublishingandDisseminationofPOs 3
2.1.3ProcessemployedfordefiningofthePOs 5
2.1.4POsalignmentwithNBAGraduate 10
Attributes
2.1.5Establishmentofthecorrelationbetween 5
thePOsandPEOs
2.2 AttainmentofProgrammeOutcomes 40 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
subcriterion2.2>
2.2.1IllustrationofCOscontributiontothePOs 10
2.2.2Descriptionofmodesofcoursedelivery 10
helpinginattainmentofthePOs
2.2.3Indicationoftoolsusedtoassesstheimpact 10
ofdeliveryofcourse/coursecontentcontribute
towardstheattainmentofCOs/POs
2.2.4Justificationfortheextenttowhichthe 10
laboratoryandprojectworkcontributingtowards
theattainmentofthePOs
2.3 AssessmentofattainmentofProgramme 75 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
Outcomes subcriterion2.3>
2.3.1Descriptionofassessmenttoolsand 25
processesusedforassessingtheattainmentof
eachPO
2.3.2ResultsofattainmentofeachPOs 50
2.4 Useofassessmentresultstowardsimprovement 10 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
ofprogramme subcriterion2.4>
Weakness
Deficiency
Without
concern
concern
Points
Points
Max.
With
C,WorD
3.1 Curriculum 15 <overalllevelofcompliancefor

subcriterion3.1>
3.1.1DescriptionoftheStructureofthe 5
Curriculum
3.1.2Prerequisiteflowchartofcourses 5
3.1.3Justificationfortheprogrammecurriculum 5
satisfyingtheprogrammespecificcriteria
3.2 Curriculumcomponentsandrelevanceto 15 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
ProgrammeOutcomesandProgramme subcriterion3.1>
EducationalObjectives
3.3 Coreengineeringcoursesandtheirrelevanceto 30 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
ProgrammeOutcomesincludingdesign subcriterion3.1>
experience
3.4 Industryinteraction/internship 10 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
subcriterion3.1>
3.5 Detailsoftheprocessesusedtoidentifythe 15
curriculargapstotheattainmentoftheCOs/POs
3.6 Detailsofthecontentbeyondsyllabusimported 35
toattaintheCOs/POs
3.7 CourseSyllabi 5
Weakness
Deficiency
Without
concern
concern
Points
Points
Max.
With
C,WorD
4.1 Successrate 30
4.2 Academicperformance 20
4.3 Placementandhigherstudies 30
4.4 Professionalactivities 20 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
subcriterion4.4>
4.4.1Professionalsocieties/chaptersand 4
organisingengineeringevents
4.4.2Organisationofpapercontests,design 4
contests,etc.andachievements
4.4.3Publicationoftechnicalmagazines, 4
newsletters,etc.
4.4.4Entrepreneurshipinitiatives,product 4
designs,andinnovations
4.4.5Publicationsandawardsininterinstitute 4
eventsbystudentsoftheprogrammeofstudy
Without
concern
concern
Deficienc
Weakne
Points
Points
Max.
With

ss
y
C,WorD
5.1 Studentteacherratio 20

5.2 Facultycadreratio 20

5.3 Facultyqualifications 30

5.4 FacultycompetenciescorrelationtoProgramme 15
SpecificCriteria

5.5 Facultyasparticipants/resourcepersonsinfaculty 15
development/trainingactivities

5.6 Facultyretention 15

5.7 Facultyresearchpublications 20

5.8 Facultyintellectualpropertyrights 10

5.9 FacultyR&DandConsultancy(FRDC)work 20

5.10 Facultyinteractionwithoutsideworld 10

Weakness
Deficiency
Without
concern
concern
Points
Points
Max.
With
C,WorD
6.1 Classrooms 30 <overalllevelofcompliancefor

subcriterion6.1>
6.1.1Adequatenumberofroomsforlectures 10
(core/electives),seminars,tutorials,etc.,forthe
program
6.1.2Teachingaidsmultimediaprojectors,etc. 15
6.1.3Acoustics,classroomsize,conditionsof 5
chairs/benches,aircirculation,lighting,exits,
ambience,andsuchotheramenities/facilities
6.2 Facultyrooms 20 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
subcriterion6.2>
6.2.1Availabilityofindividualfacultyrooms 5
6.2.2Roomequippedwithwhite/blackboard, 10
computer,Internet,andsuchother
amenities/facilities
6.2.3Usageofroomforcounselling/discussion 5
withstudents
6.3 Laboratoriesincludingcomputingfacility 60 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
subcriterion6.3>
6.3.1Adequate,wellequippedlaboratoriesto 20
meetthecurriculumrequirementsandthePOs
6.3.2Availabilityofcomputingfacilitiesinthe 15
department
6.3.3Availabilityoflaboratorieswithtechnical 15
supportwithinandbeyondworkinghours
6.3.4Equipmenttorunexperimentsandtheir 10
maintenance,numberofstudentsper
experimentalsetup,sizeofthelaboratories,
overallambience,etc.
6.4 Technicalmanpowersupport 15 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
subcriterion6.4>
6.4.1Availabilityofadequateandqualified 10
technicalsupportingstaffforprogrammespecific
laboratories
6.4.2Incentives,skillupgrade,andprofessional 5
advancement
Weakness Briefstatementdetailingevidenceusedto
Deficiency
Without
concern
concern
Points
Points
Max.
With

C,WorD
7.1 AcademicSupportUnits 35 <overalllevelofcompliancefor

subcriterion7.1>
7.1.1AssessmentofFirstYearStudentTeacher 10
Ratio(FYSTR)
7.1.2AssessmentofFacultyQualification 15
TeachingFirstYearCommonCourses
7.1.3Basicscience/engineeringlaboratories 8
(adequacyofspace,numberofstudentsper
batch,qualityandavailabilityofmeasuring
instruments,laboratorymanuals,listof
experiments)
7.1.4Languagelaboratory 2
7.2 TeachingLearningProcess 40 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
subcriterion7.2>
7.2.1Tutorialclassestoaddressstudent 5
questions:sizeoftutorialclasses,hoursper
subjectgiveninthetimetable
7.2.2Mentoringsystemtohelpatindividual 5
levels
7.2.3Feedbackanalysisandreward/corrective 5
measurestaken,ifany
7.2.4Scopeforselflearning 5
7.2.5Generationofselflearningfacilities,and 5
availabilityofmaterialsforlearningbeyond
syllabus
7.2.6CareerGuidance,Training,Placement,and 5
EntrepreneurshipCell
7.2.7CocurricularandExtracurricularActivities 5
7.2.8GamesandSports,facilities,andqualified 5
sportsinstructors

Criterion8:Governance,InstitutionalSupportandFinancialResources
Weakness
Deficiency
Without
concern
concern
Points
Points
Max.
With
C,WorD
8.1 CampusInfrastructureandFacility 10 <overalllevelofcompliancefor

subcriterion8.1>
8.1.1Maintenanceofacademicinfrastructureand 4
facilities
8.1.2Hostel(boysandgirls),transportation 2
facility,andcanteen
8.1.3Electricity,powerbackup,telecomfacility, 4
drinkingwater,andsecurity
8.2 Organisation,Governance,andTransparency 10 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
subcriterion8.2>
8.2.1Governingbody,administrativesetup,and 2
functionsofvariousbodies
8.2.2Definedrules,procedures,recruitment,and 2
promotionalpolicies,etc.
8.2.3Decentralizationinworkingincluding 3
delegationoffinancialpowerandgrievance
redressalsystem
8.2.4Transparencyandavailabilityof 3
correct/unambiguousinformation
8.3 BudgetAllocation,Utilisation,andPublic 10 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
Accounting subcriterion8.3>
8.3.1Adequacyofbudgetallocation 4
8.3.2Utilisationofallocatedfunds 5
8.3.3Availabilityoftheauditedstatementsonthe 1
instituteswebsite
8.4 ProgrammeSpecificBudget 10 <overalllevelofcompliancefor
subcriterion8.4>
Allocation, Utilisation
8.4.1 Adequacy of budget allocation 5
8.4.2 Utilisation of allocated funds 5
Library 20 <overall level of compliance for
8.5
sub-criterion 8.5>
8.5.1 Library space and ambience, timings and 5
usage, availability of a qualified librarian and
other staff, library automation, online access,
networking, etc.
8.5.2 Titles and volumes per title 4
8.5.3 Scholarly journal subscription 3
8.5.4 Digital Library 3
8.5.5 Library expenditure on books, 5
magazines/journals, and miscellaneous contents
8.6 Internet 5
Safety Norms and Checks 5 <overall level of compliance for
8.7
sub-criterion 8.7>
8.7.1 Checks for wiring and electrical installations 1
for leakage and earthing
8.7.2 Fire-fighting measurements 1
8.7.3 Safety of civil structure 1
8.7.4 Handling of hazardous chemicals and such 2
other activities
Counselling and Emergency Medical 5
8.8
Care and First-aid
8.8.1 Availability of counselling 1
facility
8.8.2 Arrangement for emergency 2
medical care
8.8.3 Availability of first-aid unit 2
Criterion 9: Continuous Improvement
Points Compliance Non Compliance
Brief statement detailing evidence used to
Weakness
Deficiency
Awarded
Without
concern
concern
Points
Points
Max.
With
C, W or D
9.1 Improvement in Success Index of Students 5

9.2 Improvement in Academic Performance Index of 5
Students
9.3 Improvement in Student-Teacher Ratio 10
9.4 Enhancement of Faculty Qualification Index 10
9.5 Improvement in Faculty Research Publications, 20
R&D Work and Consultancy Work
9.6 Continuing Education 10
9.7 New Facility Created 20
9.8 Overall Improvements since last accreditation, if 20
any, otherwise, since the commencement of the
programme
Prepared and submitted by Programme Evaluation Team
Chairperson Name & Signature Evaluator 1 Name & Signature Evaluator 2 Name & Signature
DeclarationofConformitywithevaluatorsreportbytheTeamChair
YES NO
I agree with the observations of the program evaluators on each criterion.
If no, kindly mention the reasons thereof:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________
_______________________
Signature
(Chairperson)
AnnexureVII
DAYWISEPROGRAMMEAUDITSHEETS
<<INSTITUTENAME>>
<<PROGRAMME>>
<<VISITDATE>>

Day1
Time ProgrammeEvaluator RemarksandObservations
07:0008:00 BreakfastatHotel
08:0009:00 MovetotheUniversity/Institute
09:0009:15 NBAvisitingteamtobereceivedbyUniversity/Institutionalrepresentatives
09:1510:15 PresentationonUniversity/Institutionbydean/headoftheinstitution
Overviewongovernance,organizationalstructure,academicinfrastructure
Institutionalfinancialresourcesandtheireffectiveutilizationforcontinuous
qualityimprovement
Academicsupportunitsandtheircontributionstotheprograms
Overviewonrecentdevelopmentsineducationdelivery,mentoringand
learningfacilities
Q&AontheissuescommontoallProgrammes
Criterion8:Governance,InstitutionalsupportandFinancialResources
10:1511:15 Tourofbasicscienceandengineeringlaboratories,languagelaboratoryandcareer
guidancefacilitiesbyTeamA*
Touroflibrary,hostelfacilities,sportsfacilitiesandotheramenitiesbyTeamB*
*TeamAandTeamBareconstitutedbyTCwithonePEfromeachprogramandTC
canbememberofanyteam
11:3012:00 Observelectureandtutorialinprogress

12:0013:00 PresentationonDepartmentOverviewandUG(.)programmebyHeadofthe
Department/ProgrammeCoordinator
ProgrammeEducationalObjectives,participationofconstituents,levelof
implementation
OverviewonCoursecontentdelivery,Courseoutcomeassessmentand
evaluationmethods
OverviewonAssessmentandEvaluationofProgrammeOutcomes
Curriculumdesignandrevision,andProgrammespecificcriteria
Academicperformanceofstudents,participationinprofessionalactivities
andtheirachievements
Facultydevelopmentandresearchactivities
13:0014:00 Lunch
14:0015:00 Touroflaboratoryfacilities,computingfacilities,departmentlibraryetc.relevantto
theprogramme
Interviewwithconcernedfaculty/stafftoevaluate:
Thelaboratoryfacilitiestoconductthecurricularpracticalcourses
Availabilityofadequatetechnicalsupportingstaff
Adequacyofwellfurnishedlecture/tutorial/seminarhallstorunthe
programme
15:0015:30 ReviewofFinalyearprojectreporttoevaluatetheirrelevancetoProgramme
Outcomes
15:4516:30 Interviewwithstudentstoevaluate,
effectivenessofContentdeliveryandassessmentmethods
participationinprofessionalsocietyactivities/Clubactivities
AnyotherissuesidentifiedbythePEsrelatedaccreditationcriteria
16:3018:00 MeetingwithProgrammeCoordinator,CourseCoordinatoretc.
EvaluationofContentdeliverymethodsandCourseoutcomestowards
attainmentofPOs
Improvementsinthecoursecontent,deliveryandassessmentmethods
basedonlevelofattainmentofCOsandPOs
18:0019:00 MovebacktoHotel
19:0020:30 TeamDinner
20:3022:00 Teammeeting:ChairedbyTCatHotel
ExchangeanddiscussabouttheissuesofDay1evaluation
DiscussionbetweenPEsandTCtomaintainconsistencyacrossall
programmes
SubmitDay1draftevaluationreporttoTC
Day02
Time ProgrammeEvaluator RemarksandObservations
09:0009:15 NBAvisitingteamtobereceivedbyHeadoftheDepartment/ProgrammeCoordinator
09:1510:45 Interviewwithfacultymemberstoevaluate:
Facultycompetencyagainstprogrammespecificcriteria
Updatingoffacultydomainknowledge
Facultyresearch,consultancyandKnowledgetransfer
Documentspertainedtofacultyprofile,facultycontributionsetc.
AnyotherissuesidentifiedbythePEsrelatedaccreditationcriteria
Criterion9:ContinuousImprovements
10:4511:30 Meetingwithprogrammecoordinator/HeadoftheDepartment
Documentspertainedtostudentacademicperformance,student
accomplishmentsetc.
11:4512:30 Interviewwithfaculty/Boardofstudies/advisoryboardtoevaluate
Levelofinvolvementofstakeholdersintheprogrammedevelopment
ConsistencyofPEOswiththemissionofthedepartment
LevelofContributionsofindustrytoprogramme
12:3001:00 Interviewwithsampledstudents(academicperformance)toevaluate,
Levelofattainmentofknowledgeskillsandattitudes
13:0014:00 Lunch
14.0014.45 MeetingwithAlumnioftheprogramme
(graduatesconsideredfortheattainmentofPEOs)toevaluate:
levelofparticipationintheprogrammeafterthegraduation
levelofattainmentofPEOs
14.4516.30 MeetingwithProgrammeCoordinator/HeadoftheDepartmenttoevaluate:
Checkonremediationofshortcomings/improvementsfromprevious
accreditationvisit
AppropriatenessofassessmenttoolsusedforPOsandPEOs
LevelofattainmentofPOsandPEOs
CheckallthedocumentsandevidencesrelevanttotheattainmentofPOsand
PEOs
Criterion1:Vision,MissionandProgrammeEducationalObjectivesCriterion2:
ProgrammeOutcomes
16.3017.30 PrivatemeetingofPEs
DiscussionamongPEsforsummarizingtheobservationsmadeduring
evaluationofday1andday2visvisaccreditationcriteria
17.3018.00 Meetingwithprogrammecoordinator/HeadoftheDepartmentforanyfurther
clarifications
20:3022:00 Teammeeting:ChairedbyTCatHotel
ExchangeanddiscussabouttheissuesofDay2evaluation
DiscussionbetweenPEsandTCtomaintainconsistencyacrossallprogrammes
Day3
Time ProgrammeEvaluators RemarksandObservations
09:0009:15 NBAvisitingteamtobereceivedbyHeadoftheInstitute/Dean
9.1510.30 PreparetheexitmeetingstatementbyPEsandTC
10.3011.30 ExitmeetingchairedbyTC.Readtheexitmeetingstatementsofalltheprogrammes
11.301.00 Submitvisitreportandclosethevisitactivity
1.002.00 Lunch
AnnexureVIII
VisitSchedule
>>InstituteNameandplace<<
>>DateofVisit<<
Day0
Time ProgrammeEvaluators(PEs) TeamChairperson(TC)
17:00 ArrivalatHotel
18:3020:00 Teammeeting:ChairedbyTCatHotel Introductions:PEandTCatHotel
ReviewofprevisitevaluationreportsofallProgrammes Collateprevisitevaluationreportsofallprograms
IdentifyanddiscussissuescommontoallProgrammes Finalizethescope/purposeofmeetingsscheduled
BriefingtoPEsonevaluationprocessduringvisit
followedbyQ&Asession
Day1
09:0009:15 NBAvisitingteamtobereceivedbyUniversity/Institutionalrepresentatives
09:1510:15 PresentationonUniversity/Institutionbydean/headoftheinstitution
Overviewongovernance,organizationalstructure,academicinfrastructure
Institutionalfinancialresourcesandtheireffectiveutilizationforcontinuousqualityimprovement
Academicsupportunitsandtheircontributionstotheprograms
Overviewonrecentdevelopmentsineducationdelivery,mentoringandlearningfacilities
Q&AontheissuescommontoallProgrammes
10:1511:15 Tourofbasicscienceandengineeringlaboratories,languagelaboratoryandcareerguidancefacilitiesbyTeamA*
Touroflibrary,hostelfacilities,sportsfacilitiesandotheramenitiesbyTeamB*
*TeamAandTeamBareconstitutedbyTCwithonePEfromeachprogramandTCcanbememberofanyteam
11:3012:00 Observelectureandtutorialinprogress InterviewwithFacultyofmathematics,basicsciences
andengineeringsupportingtheprogrammesunder
Criterion2:ProgrammeOutcomes accreditation
Criterion3:ProgrammeCurriculum Criterion7:AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess
12:0013:00 PresentationonDepartmentOverviewandUG(.)programme Interviewwithofficersconcernedtoevaluate:
byHeadoftheDepartment/ProgrammeCoordinator academicinfrastructureandfacilities
ProgrammeEducationalObjectives,participationof budgetallocationandutilization
constituents,levelofimplementation practicesofOrganizationandGovernance
OverviewonCoursecontentdelivery,Courseoutcome Criterion8:Governance,Institutionalsupportand
assessmentandevaluationmethods FinancialResources
OverviewonAssessmentandEvaluationofProgramme
Outcomes
Curriculumdesignandrevision,andProgrammespecific
criteria
Academicperformanceofstudents,participationin
professionalactivitiesandtheirachievements
Facultydevelopmentandresearchactivities
Criterion1:Vision,MissionandProgrammeEducational
Objectives
13:0014:00 Lunch
14:0015:00 Touroflaboratoryfacilities,computingfacilities,department Checkandevaluatethedocumentspertainingto:
libraryetc.relevanttotheprogramme Admissionsquality
Interviewwithconcernedfaculty/stafftoevaluate: Academicsupportunits
Thelaboratoryfacilitiestoconductthecurricularpractical Teachingandlearningprocess
courses
Availabilityofadequatetechnicalsupportingstaff Criterion7:AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
Adequacyofwellfurnishedlecture/tutorial/seminarhalls LearningProcess
toruntheprogramme
15:0015:30 ReviewofFinalyearprojectreporttoevaluatetheirrelevanceto InterviewwithControllerofExaminations:Assessment
ProgrammeOutcomes andEvaluationpractices,Auditingprocess,Grievances
Criterion2:ProgrammeOutcomes andRedressalsystem
15:4516:30 Interviewwithstudentstoevaluate, Evaluatesupportingsystemsvisvistrainingand
effectivenessofContentdeliveryandassessmentmethods placementandCareerGuidance
participationinprofessionalsocietyactivities/Club Criterion4:StudentsPerformance
activities
AnyotherissuesidentifiedbythePEsrelatedaccreditation
criteria
16:3018:00 MeetingwithProgrammeCoordinator,CourseCoordinatoretc. Make a survey visit to programme to ensure
EvaluationofContentdeliverymethodsandCourse consistency and to answer any uncommon
outcomestowardsattainmentofPOs issues raised during programme specific
Improvementsinthecoursecontent,deliveryand evaluation.
assessmentmethodsbasedonlevelofattainmentofCOs Meet with Dean/Head of the Institution to
andPOs discussthefindingsofDayIevaluation.
20:3022:00 Teammeeting:ChairedbyTCatHotel TCchairsthemeeting:
ExchangeanddiscussabouttheissuesofDay1evaluation ProvidegeneralguidelinesfordecisiontoPEs
DiscussionbetweenPEsandTCtomaintainconsistency Checktheconsistencyforalltheprogrammes
acrossallprogrammes
Day02
09:0009:15 NBAvisitingteamtobereceivedbyHeadoftheDepartment/ProgrammeCoordinator
09:1510:45 Interviewwithfacultymemberstoevaluate:
Facultycompetencyagainstprogrammespecificcriteria Meetingwiththeofficialsconcernedtoevaluatethe
Updatingoffacultydomainknowledge effectivefunctioningof:
Facultyresearch,consultancyandKnowledgetransfer IndustryInstituteinteractionBoard
Documentspertainedtofacultyprofile,faculty InstitutionlevelQualityMonitoringandAssurance
contributionsetc.
AnyotherissuesidentifiedbythePEsrelatedaccreditation Criterion3:ProgrammeCurriculum
criteria Criterion9:ContinuousImprovement
10:4511:30 Meetingwithprogrammecoordinator/HeadoftheDepartment Meetingwiththeofficialsconcernedtoevaluatethe
Documentspertainedtostudentacademicperformance, effectivefunctioningof:
studentaccomplishmentsetc. InstitutionlevelQualityMonitoringandAssurance
Criterion4:StudentsPerformance Criterion3:ProgrammeCurriculum
Criterion9:ContinuousImprovements Criterion9:ContinuousImprovement
11:4512:30 Interviewwithfaculty/Boardofstudies/advisoryboardto
evaluate MeetingwithGoverningBodymemberstoevaluate
Levelofinvolvementofstakeholdersintheprogramme Governance,Organisationanddecentralization
development Criterion8:Governance,Institutionalsupportand
ConsistencyofPEOswiththemissionofthedepartment FinancialResources
LevelofContributionsofindustrytoprogramme
Objectives
12:3001:00 Interviewwithsampledstudents(academicperformance)to Meetingwiththeofficialsconcernedtoevaluatethe
evaluate, effectivefunctioningof:
Levelofattainmentofknowledgeskillsandattitudes AcademicCouncil
Criterion2:ProgrammeOutcomes Criterion3:ProgrammeCurriculum
Criterion4:StudentsPerformance Criterion9:ContinuousImprovement
13:0014:00 Lunch
14.0014.45 MeetingwithAlumnioftheprogramme Meetingwithpotentialemployer/industrytoevaluate:
(graduatesconsideredfortheattainmentofPEOs)toevaluate: levelofparticipation
levelofparticipationintheprogrammeafterthe performanceofthegraduatesintheirorganization
graduation
levelofattainmentofPEOs Criterion1:Vision,MissionandProgrammeEducational
Criterion1:Vision,MissionandProgrammeEducational Objectives
Objectives
14.4516.30 MeetingwithProgrammeCoordinator/HeadoftheDepartmentto Make a survey visit to programme to ensure
evaluate: consistency and to answer any uncommon issues
Checkonremediationofshortcomings/improvements raisedduringprogrammespecificevaluation.
frompreviousaccreditationvisit
AppropriatenessofassessmenttoolsusedforPOsand
PEOs
LevelofattainmentofPOsandPEOs
Checkallthedocumentsandevidencesrelevanttothe
attainmentofPOsandPEOs
ObjectivesCriterion2:ProgrammeOutcomes
16.3017.30 PrivatemeetingofPEs Makeasurveyvisittoprogrammetoensure
DiscussionamongPEsforsummarizingtheobservations consistencyandtoansweranyuncommonissues
madeduringevaluationofday1andday2visvis raisedduringprogrammespecificevaluation
accreditationcriteria
17.3018.00 Meetingwithprogrammecoordinator/HeadoftheDepartment Meeting with Dean/Head of the Institution to discuss the
foranyfurtherclarifications findingsofDay2evaluation
20:3022:00 Teammeeting:ChairedbyTCatHotel TCchairsthemeeting:
ExchangeanddiscussabouttheissuesofDay2evaluation ProvidegeneralguidelinesfordecisiontoPEs
DiscussionbetweenPEsandTCtomaintainconsistency Checktheconsistencyforalltheprogrammes
acrossallprogrammes
Day3
09:0009:15 NBAvisitingteamtobereceivedbyHeadoftheInstitute/Dean
9.1510.30 PreparetheexitmeetingstatementbyPEsandTC
10.3011.30 ExitmeetingchairedbyTC.Readtheexitmeetingstatementsofalltheprogrammes
11.301.00 Submitvisitreportandclosethevisitactivity
1.002.00 Lunch
AnnexureX
Form - A
Feedback Form to be filled by the Institution
Regarding Accreditation Visit
Purpose
This form is designed to have a fair opinion of the team which has visited your institution. This will enable the NBA to improve
its system and make it more effective. We thank you in advance for the time and effort you are investing in filling out this form.
1. Name of the Institution:

______________________________________________________________
2. Programme(s) evaluated:
_________________________________________________________________
3. Date(s) of visit:
________________________________________________________________
4. Name of Chairperson:
________________________________________________________________
5. Names of Evaluators:
1.__________________2.__________________3._____________________
4.__________________5.__________________6.____________________
7.__________________8.__________________9.____________________
10._________________11._________________12.___________________
___
6. Please comment on the evaluation methodology adopted by the team during the visit.
7. Whether the evaluators have tendered any advice to improve the system? If yes, please specify.
(i) Name of the Evaluator:
(ii) Advice:
8. Whether any of the evaluators were specific about the relevant topics related to the programme? If no, please
specify.
9. Whether the evaluators interacted with students and faculty in groups or with students and faculty in private? If
yes, please specify the name of the students/faculty.
10. Whether the head of the institute or any representative of the management was also present during the
interaction? If yes, please specify.
(i) Name of the representative:
(ii) Observation of the representative about interaction:
11. Whether evaluators have been facilitated by the institute for outdoor activity? If yes, please specify.
(i) On whose insistence:

(ii) What activity:

12. Whether the exit meeting met the purpose i.e., to share the visiting teams perceptions and general
observations about the institution and programmes.
13. Specify the participants of the exit meeting.
14. Please comment on the general behaviour of the visiting team (Chairperson and evaluators) during the visit?
Whether hospitality was extended to the visiting team? If yes, please specify the participants and the kind of
hospitality offered.
Signature of the Head of Institution
Thank you for your feedback!

Form - B
Feedback Form to be filled by the Chairperson about
the Institution and Team Members
Purpose
This form is designed to have a fair opinion about the team members who have assisted you during the visit. This will enable
the NBA to improve its system and make it more effective. We thank you in advance for the time and effort you are investing in
filling out this form.

______________________________________________________________
2. Programme(s) evaluated:
______________________________________________________________

3. Date (s) of visit:
______________________________________________________________

4. Name of Chairperson:
______________________________________________________________

5. Name of Evaluators: 1.________________________2.__________________________________
4.__________________5.__________________6.____________________
7.__________________8.__________________9.____________________
10._________________11._________________12.___________________
___
6. Please comment on the evaluation methodology adopted by the evaluators.
7. Whether the evaluator has tendered any advice to improve the system? If yes, please specify.
i) Name (s) of the Evaluator:
ii) Advice:
8. Whether the evaluators were specific about the relevant topics related to the programme? If no, please specify.
9. Whether the evaluator interacted with students and faculty in groups or with students and faculty in private? If
yes, please specify the name of the students/faculty.
10. Whether the evaluator has been facilitated by the institution for outdoor activity? If yes, please specify.
i) On whose insistence:
ii) What activity:
11. Please comment on the general behaviour and etiquette of the evaluators during the visit.
12. Please comment on the general behaviour and etiquette of the Head of the Institution/other key officials.
13. Please comment on the cooperation and coordination rendered by the institution.
Signature of the Chairperson

Form - C
Feedback Form to be filled by the Evaluator about the
Institution, Co-evaluator and Chairperson
Purpose
This form is designed to have a fair opinion about the team members who have assisted you during the visit. This will enable
the NBA to improve its system and make it more effective. We thank you in advance for the time and effort you are investing in
filling out this form.
1. Name of the Institution

:______________________________________________________________
2. Programme (s) evaluated

:______________________________________________________________

3. Date (s) of visit
:______________________________________________________________

4. Name of Chairperson
:______________________________________________________________

5. Name of Evaluator
:______________________________________________________________
6. Name of Co-Evaluator :.__________________________________________________________
7. Please comment on the ability of the chairperson to resolve disputes, if any, between the evaluators.
8. Whether the chairperson has tendered any advice to improve the system? If yes, please specify.
9. Whether the chairperson has extended openness with the evaluators? If no, please specify.
10. Whether the chairperson has been facilitated by the institute for outdoor activity. If yes, please specify.
i) On whose insistence:
ii) What activity:
11. Please comment on the general behaviour and etiquette of the chairperson during the visit.
12. Please comment on the general behaviour and etiquette of the Head of the Institution / other key officials.
13. Please comment on the general behaviour and etiquette of the co-evaluator.
14. Please comment on the cooperation rendered by the co-evaluator.
15. Please comment on the cooperation and coordination rendered by the institution.
Signature of the Evaluator

Form - D
Feedback Form to be filled by the
Chairperson/Evaluator(s) about Service Provider
Purpose
This form is designed to have a fair opinion about the Service Provider hired by the NBA. This will enable the NBA to improve
its system and make it more effective. We thank you in advance for the time and effort you are investing in filling out this form.
2. Date (s) of visit:
3. Name of the Chairperson/Evaluator*:
4. Name of the Service Provider:
Assessment of the Service Provider
I How was your overall experience with the service provider?
II Please comment on customer service, travel management and consulting services.
III Please comment on the travel and lodging requirements met during the visit.
IV Please comment on your travel documentation.
V Are you satisfied with the service provided by the Service Provider? If no, please specify.
*Please strike out whichever is not applicable Signature of the Chairperson/Evaluator
DECLARATION FORM
Name and Address of the Institution to be visited:
Name and Address of the Chairperson/Expert Member of the Evaluation Team:
I do hereby declare that I dont have or didnt have had a close or active association with the
above institution in any of the following form:-
1. Iamneitheremployedcurrentlynorwasemployedinthepastasfaculty,stafforConsultant
bytheinstitution;
2. Iamneitherengagedcurrentlynorwasengagedinthepastinanydiscussionornegotiation
ofemploymentwiththeinstitution;
3. Ihaveneverattendedtheaboveinstitutionasastudent;
4. Ihaveneverreceivedanhonorarydegreefromtheinstitution;
5. Noclose/familyrelativeofmineisastudentoremployeeoftheinstitution
6. IdonotownamembershipintheinstitutionsBoardofTrustees/IndustryAdvisoryBoard.
IherebydeclarethatIhavenoconflictofinterestintheproposedNBAaccreditationassignmentat
this institution and I will follow the NBA conflict of interest Policies. I shall abide by the code of
conductandwillconductmyselfinprofessionalmannerandupholdthedignityandesteemofthe
positionbestoweduponme.
Name:
Signature:
Date:
26

UG - Tier II - Evaluation Report

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

UG - Tier II - Evaluation Report

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

AnnexureII

Criteria Compliance Observationandremarks

Criteria Compliance ObservationandremarksforNonCompliance

1.1 MissionandVision 5 <overalllevelofcompliancefor

2.1 DefinitionandValidationofCourseOutcomesand 25 <overalllevelofcompliancefor

3.1 Curriculum 15 <overalllevelofcompliancefor

No. Criteria determine

6.1 Classrooms 30 <overalllevelofcompliancefor

No. Criteria determine

7.1 AcademicSupportUnits 35 <overalllevelofcompliancefor

8.1 CampusInfrastructureandFacility 10 <overalllevelofcompliancefor

9.1 Improvement in Success Index of Students 5

If no, kindly mention the reasons thereof:

1. Name of the Institution:

(i) Name of the Evaluator:

(i) Name of the representative:

(ii) Observation of the representative about interaction:

(i) On whose insistence:

13. Specify the participants of the exit meeting.

Signature of the Head of Institution

Thank you for your feedback!

1. Name of the Institution:

6. Please comment on the evaluation methodology adopted by the evaluators.

i) Name (s) of the Evaluator:

ii) What activity:

Signature of the Chairperson

Thank you for your feedback!

1. Name of the Institution

2. Programme (s) evaluated

6. Name of Co-Evaluator :.__________________________________________________________

ii) What activity:

14. Please comment on the cooperation rendered by the co-evaluator.

Signature of the Evaluator

Thank you for your feedback!

1. Name of the Institution:

2. Date (s) of visit:

3. Name of the Chairperson/Evaluator*:

4. Name of the Service Provider:

Assessment of the Service Provider

I How was your overall experience with the service provider?

II Please comment on customer service, travel management and consulting services.

IV Please comment on your travel documentation.

*Please strike out whichever is not applicable Signature of the Chairperson/Evaluator

Thank you for your feedback!

Name and Address of the Chairperson/Expert Member of the Evaluation Team:

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen