Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Critique
the views of Marin in relation to what you have gathered from reading other authors.
Introduction
Art History is about making the visible legible and it is no doubt that The Arcadian
Shepherd which is also known as Les bergers dArcadie or Et in Arcadia Ego is the
most famously and widely discussed of Poussins painting. The painting depicts a pastoral
scene with idealized shepherds from classical antiquity clustering around an austere tomb. In
this painting Poussins work represents the High Art of the classical style, in that it presents
elevated and learned themes with great formal rigour evocation of the antique.
Definition of Semiotics
According to Ross (1966), Semiotics can be defined as, making the study of sign processes
(1980) cited in Faoucault (2000) mentions that in any particular work of art, its interpretation
depends on the identification of denoted meaning, the recognition of the visual sign and the
connoted meaning-the instant cultural associations that come with recognition. The main
concern of the semiotic art historian is to come up with ways to navigate and interpret
connoted meaning. Semiotic art history seeks to uncover the codified meanings in an
do not commonly commit to any one particular brand of semiotics but rather construct an
amalgamated version which they incorporate into their collection of analytical tools. For
instance Meyer Schapiro borrowed Saussures differential meaning in an effort to read signs
1
Semiotics operates under a theory that an image can only be understood from the viewers
perspective. The artist is supplanted by the viewer as the purveyor of meaning, even to the
extent that an interpretation is still valid regardless of whether the creator had intended it.
Semiotics can be applied to everything which has meaning within a culture, which can be
seen as signifying something. The goal of using semiotics interpretation is to establish the
model the system of categories, relations, connotations, distinctions and rules of combination
employed.
The painting depicts three shepherds and a monumental, statue-like woman grouped around a
large stone tomb. The natural setting, and the paintings title all situate this in the mythical
realm of Arcadia. Arcadia is a utopian world of bliss where the inhabitants lived in harmony
reminiscent to the golden ages of Islam and Hindu, the resting place of virtuous and the
heroic souls. In the midst of the paradise, however, the shepherds look somewhat concerned.
The female figure, a mysterious woman provides a beautiful contrast to the discovery of
Death. She is the only figure who fully understands the meaning of the tombs inscription,
thus investing her with a far higher purpose. However, Art historians have waged fierce
battles as to whether she represents Reason or not, the goddess Athena, or is she Death
herself?
On the other hand Panofsky indicates that the painting illustrates a text. The words on the
tomb are meant to be the visual centre of the painting. Symbolism was important to Poussin
because he was interested in making philosophical statements with the images in his
paintings. He sought to make statements about, the here and now often the iconography of
2
his work is very intricate. In his work everything is subordinate to the idea of composition,
Panofskys Views
Arcadian Shepherds by stating that the painting reverts back to the classical stlye which
shows order, discipline and clarity. However, their analysis takes different paths. Panofsky
analyzes in his classical study of the picture, that the scene is one in which virtually all
movement has been eliminated. Three shepherds and a shepherdess appear welded into a
single group which follows the contours of the tomb, as though already confined by its
controlling law. The composition is of the utmost simplicity which is why the picture is
According to Essays presented to Cassirer (1936) Panofsky notes how its current normal
sense has enjoyed unsurpassed happiness, which is enduringly alive. He defines the nature of
Arcadia as the ideal place the visionary and literary realm of harmony and natural sweetness.
Natures own laws are reversed under the pressure of suffering and the good things of nature
are withheld to be replaced by things of ugliness. Pliny the Elder an ancient historian regards
the painting as a rational response to mortality, which is shown by the kneeling shepherd in
the centre of the painting. The shadow he casts is thus interpreted as literal foreshadowing of
Marins Hypothesis
Marin is of the view that besides the existence of the painting nothing in the iconic message
marks its situation of emission and reception, that is to say no figure is looking at us as
viewers, nobody addresses us a representative of the sender of the message Marin quoted in
3
(Preziosi, 1998) All the viewer experiences is the figures caught up performing their
narrative functions and they do not need us in order to narrate themselves. We are only
insuperable distance of the painter-narrator of the story. Which means the scene represented,
operates in a propositional content, the negation of all marks of emission and reception of the
narrative message.
For Marin, the painting functions as a metapictorial sign, making a larger statement about
pictures in general. Poussins painting tells us something about the language of painting by
positing a series of equivalences between the verbal and visual language. Marin reveals the
painting as a form of address. A shift takes place when we turn what we see into language,
when we verbalise all the semi-conscious thoughts and fleeting sensations that occur when
we look at the painting. A cut happens when we move from what Marin calls a perceptual
continuum into a figurative discontinuum when seeing turns into reading. He regards the
painting as giving us clues on how to look. Our reading of the painting converts depth into
breadth and the four figures are arrayed into a frieze. It is as though we need to rotate the
picture plane to 90 degrees forward to understand the painting or look at it sideways from the
right. The painting moves us from ignorance to wisdom represented by the poised woman
Marin further looks at the painting from a syntactic level, the challenge of iconic deixis
equivalence between painter and viewer is also found in the example of the full-face portrait.
The sitter of the portrait appears only to be the represented enunciative. Alberti articulates
the problem, that the figure is called the commentator in which it makes the painting more
4
emotionally effective to introduce the istoria , a character who by his gestures and emotional
expression points out the important part of the story to the viewer at whom he looks at and
thus establishes a link between the scene represented and the viewer.
On the other hand Panofsky views the work as a symbolic form, which is the contradictory
through which the spectator, man, contemplates the scene presented on the canvas as if he
saw the real scene in the world. To him the screen is a surface, a material support which is
also a reflecting device on which the real objects are pictured. The canvas as a surface does
not exist the first time that man encounters the real world. However, the canvas does exist to
operate the duplication of reality, the canvas at that time is simultaneously posited and
theoretically defines the representational screen. What is represented is the very process of
representation. Panofskys builds an argument in which he says, it is Death itself that writes
the inscription on the tomb; the dead shepherd has written his own epitaph. Panofsky poses
the problem in the manner that is perfectly consistent with his philosophy of art history as a
constant displacement of motives and themes, forms and legends, vision and iconographic-
connections and displacements. These point out the iconological level of cultural symbols.
However, the question of the translation and meaning of the painting does not seem correctly
raised by Panofsky in his rigorous philological analysis. The phrase Et in Arcadia ego is has
an unexpressed verb which must be suggested by words given by the reader, which were
never present. On the contrary, it is not possible to suggest a past tense. Bagient and Lincoln
are of the same theory that there is a missing word and it should read Et in Arcadia Sum
5
Marin sheds more light on the fact that there is an iconic dialogue that happens between the
figures, gazes and gestures are exchanged and these are recognizable through the positions of
the heads and the orientation of the eyes. The three figures exchange a message whose
referent is what the fourth figure is dong. Jakobson quoted in Marin defines the
summarizes the painting as the pictorial representation of that model, the painter or the
beholder occupies the metaiconic or linguistic position of the linguist who constructs a model
about a communication process. The scheme is oriented between the figures in the
composition for pictorial reasons and the legible text is carved on the tomb.
The message conveyed by the painting is shown by the shepherd who is looking at a written
line pointing at it with his forefinger, reading as if trying to decipher it. He is visually saying
the written sentence since the first three words, Et in Arcadia are inscribed just out of his
open mouth in a modern version of the medieval phylactery. The kneeling shepherd points
at, reads and says the written message whose signification he attempts to grasp.
He notes the development from the lateral arrangement of forms in the 16th century painting
to the use of the vanishing point in the 17th century. His views culminate in a discussion of
unity, which he believes both centuries strived to achieve in different ways; the classical
combination of independent components and the Baroque painting being one main
component.
Panofskys analysis of the painting notes a shift in representation over time, as he asks why
the iconography used in Poussins paintings illustrates about the periods in which they were
painted. Panofsky interprets Poussins move from Baroque back to classical representation
as a reflection of the shift in attitude towards death in the French society at that time. Marin
6
argues that the figures in Poussins painting purposely do not look at the viewer in order to
better convey that they are contemplating the message of death that is being represented to
them.
Marin and Foucault iconographical analysis shed light on the fact that painting is always self-
referential, since artists are always trying to find new ways to exploit the medium. Marin
explores how the exchange of looks in Poussins painting helps to convey that a
representation of death (signified by inscription) is being related to the figures in the image.
Further Marin and Foucault reveal that a painting conveys more than one message. Paintings
can take on different meanings depending on what the viewer infers about the cultural and
historical background in which the work was created (Friedlaender, 1966). The viewer
iconological analysis of a painting reveals that conclusions can be drawn it by looking outside
the painting itself. Looking at the qualities of The Arcadian Shepherd a new dimension of
Conclusion
Marin acknowledges Wolffins principles but unlike Panofsky his approach to the painting
remains iconographical and does not stray into iconological analysis. The iconographical
approach focuses on the painting itself and its formal qualities. Marin looks at the formal
qualities that Wolffin acknowledges as being common to the classical style and his analysis
centres on how an economy gaze conveys meaning about Poussins painting to the spectator.
Marins analysis of the painting shows that not all painting is limited to one message.
7
References
Essays presented to Cassirer, E .ed. Bansky, K and Patton, H. Oxford (1936) 223-254
Foucault, M (2000) Las Meninas In The Continental Aesthetics Reader . New York :
Ross, M. (1990) Ideal Landscape: Annibale Carracci, Nicolas Poussin, and Claude Lorrain.
Preziosi, D (1998) The Art of Art History : A Critical Anthology. Oxford: OUP
Wolfflin, H. Principles of Art History In the Art of Art History : A critical Anthology.
http://www.artble.com/artists/nicolas_poussin/paintings/the_arcadian_shepherds - retrieved
14 December 2015.