Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Cracking the
country code
allocation in
emerging markets
WHITE PAPER
For professional investors
September 2017
Countries matter
In 2016, Brazil was the best performing emerging country with a US dollar return of 66%.
This was driven by a recovery in commodity prices, the replacement of former president
Dilma Rousseff with a reform-minded government and the start of a significant interest rate
cutting cycle. Over the same period, fellow major Latin American market, Mexico, declined
by 9% due to a weak peso and escalating fears that Trump would abandon the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
These kind of return differences are not abnormal in the emerging market universe. Figure
1 shows the three best and worst countries in terms of performance in the last three years.
These differences are usually large, not just in the last three years, but quite consistently
and the return difference between the best and worst country is often more than 100%.
Furthermore, the average return difference over the last ten years for an emerging country
versus the overall index is 16%.
The country effect dominates the sector effect, implying that emerging market
performance is driven more by countries than by sectors. This contrasts with developed
markets, where, since 2000, the sector effect has mostly been larger than the country
effect (although recent experience in the euro countries, for example, shows that
countries still matter in developed markets too).
The country effect was strongest in the 90s, when a series of country-specific financial
crises had a large impact on country returns. This has been smaller since the 2008
financial crisis and the resulting changes in global risk appetite which hit all emerging
markets more or less at the same time. Most recently, the country effect has become
more important again with clear differences in domestic political developments and the
effects of commodity price fluctuations.
The overall conclusion is quite clear, emerging markets as an asset class are far from
homogeneous and performance can differ significantly from one country to another. 1. The market effect measures the variance of the
overall emerging markets index. A large market
There are major differences in structural outlook, position in the economic cycle, the effect means that emerging markets generally move
quality and direction of policy making and the earnings outlook for listed companies. In in line. This analysis excludes the return variance of
individual stocks to focus on the relative importance
of the overall market, countries and sectors
Well-structured framework
Of course, these return differences alone do not guarantee better performance, investors
have to be able to identify which countries offer the best prospects. Since the inception of
its emerging markets team in 1994, Robeco has used a systematic approach to combine
all the different information sources and factors that are important in assessing this
asset class. As there are many different aspects to consider, it is important to have a well-
structured approach to balance the different factors and ensure that different countries are
compared in a consistent and standardized way.
The country allocation process focuses on the following factors that are consistently
evaluated for all 24 emerging markets that make up the MSCI Emerging Markets Index
(and some of the larger frontier markets).
Factor Sub-factor
Macro Long Term Long-term growth potential
Financial health
Politics, policies and ESG
Macro Short Term Growth surprises
Monetary policy
Changes in financial health
Politics and policies
Earnings Earnings trends
Deviation from consensus expectations
Valuation Valuation multiples
Sector-adjusted valuations
Technical Price momentum
Sentiment and Supply/Demand Investor positioning and sentiment
Supply/demand
Benchmark and regulatory changes
Developments in the economy and the political landscape are most important, which is
reflected in the fact that we have two macro factors. These are a long-term outlook where
we examine factors that are significant over a three- to five-year horizon, and a short-term
outlook, which focuses on what will drive the market for roughly the next six months. Both
of these time frames matter for equity returns.
Financial health
The 2008 global financial crisis rekindled the worlds awareness of the risk of financial
crises. As Reinhart and Rogoffs well-known book This Time is Different shows, this
phenomenon has actually been part of economic life for many centuries. It comes as less
of a surprise to emerging market investors as it has only played a role in their more recent
history. Figure 3 shows the major financial crises in emerging markets since the 1990s.
There are a wide range of indicators available to assess the institutional quality of
countries, including Transparency Internationals Corruption Perception Index, the
International Country Risk Guides political risk indicators and our own ESG Survey and
RobecoSAM Country Sustainability Ranking. As financial markets are forward-looking, we
are not just interested in the current level of quality, but also the likely path of change.
Thats why we also rate a countrys political direction. It makes a big difference whether a
government is consistently aiming to improve how its economy functions or is held back by
vested interests that have little inclination to change.
Research Robeco carried out in 2013 supports selecting the first two factors. If you had
a crystal ball and could see what certain economic figures would be in the future, which
factors would you choose if your focus was on equity returns? It turns out that the two most
important variables are surprises in GDP growth (actual GDP growth versus the expected
growth at the start of the year) and changes in interest rates. Figure 4 shows the results of
perfect foresight strategies for these two sub-factors. Please note that a logarithmic scale is
used, as the performance differences are huge. Of course, these results are not realistic as
unfortunately we do not have perfect foresight. Still, they do show which economic factors
deserve the most attention. In the short to medium term, surprises in GDP growth matter
more than the actual growth levels themselves, while it is evident that monetary policy is
also a key variable for equity markets.
Finally, politics and changes in government policy remain a very important factor in
emerging markets. For the short-term macro factor, we are looking out for events that
will play a role in markets in the near future (roughly the coming six months). These
include elections and other political changes, new policies that are being discussed or
implemented and the general direction of policy-making.
3 Earnings
For equity investors, the ultimate source of the return should come from the earnings
that the companies make. Trends in earnings are therefore an important determinant for
market performance. To some extent, these will already be reflected in macroeconomic
trends within the country, but it adds value to look directly at current earnings trends. For
this factor, we therefore look at changes in analysts earnings estimates and at earnings
surprises in the reported numbers. We also assess whether the consensus estimates
are consistent with the macroeconomic outlook, or whether they are too optimistic or
pessimistic.
4 Valuation
Valuation differences between emerging countries can be significant. For example, markets
like Korea and Russia currently trade well below 10x 2017 earnings, while India, Mexico
and the Philippines are at around 19x earnings. These differences can partly be explained
by diverging growth and risk outlooks, but another major component is the difference
in domestic investor base. Emerging countries differ in terms of the available capital for
investment, regulation and institutional set-up, and investor sentiment, which can lead to
significant differences in valuation. Although these can persist for longer periods of time,
in the long run they tend to converge. Valuation is therefore an important factor and we
use a range of aggregated multiples to assess this at country level. As certain valuation
5 Technical
As fundamental long-term investors, price momentum and technical analysis are not the
driving force in our country allocation process. Still, financial markets generally do exhibit
trending behavior, so we do take this into account when making decisions.
Total score
All these factors are combined together in the country allocation framework, which enables
countries to be directly compared with each other. Rankings are assigned to each element
ranging from -- (very poor) to ++ (very good) and are added together to give a total score
for each country. A bottom-up check is then also carried out to determine whether there are
enough liquid investment opportunities for a positive top-down view to be implemented.
Fact-based
In financial markets, there is no shortage of opinions about what could happen in the
future. To ensure consistency and clarity, we have a full range of data indicators that we
review on a regular basis and that are aligned to the sub-factors that we rate. Figure
5 gives the data overviews for monetary policy and long-term growth potential as an
example. In addition to analyzing the data, there is plenty of important information
that is more subjective, such as political developments and structural economic change.
Here again, we are constantly on the lookout for concrete evidence to either support or
contradict our ideas.
Dynamic
Emerging markets are in a constant process of change, thats why it is crucial to remain
open minded and to be willing to change your opinion if the facts change.
Reality check
Robecos emerging markets team members are all based in Rotterdam, which allows for
easy communication, consistency in the investment process and sufficient detachment
from local sentiment. However, obtaining local information and insights remains
important, which is why team members regularly travel to the regions we look at. In
addition to the company meetings they schedule on these trips, they also allow time to
meet government officials, policymakers, economists and observers like journalists to
check whether our top-down views match the real situation on the ground.
Source: Bloomberg, Datastream, Oxford Economics, IMF, World Bank, World Economic Forum, Robeco
This means that country views are also reflected in the stock selection and sector allocation
within a country. We are not just interested in whether a country is attractive or not, we
also want to know what the positive and negative macro drivers are. For example, if a
country has a new government which is highly motivated to implement reforms, we want
to be invested in companies that are set to benefit from those reforms. In other countries,
we may want to have a higher allocation towards interest-rate sensitive stocks or towards
consumer stocks depending on the macroeconomic outlook. And for countries where we
are not positive on the domestic outlook or the currency, we prefer to be geared towards
exporters.
Examples
Currently the two countries with the highest and lowest top-down rankings are Korea and
South Africa. Figure 7 shows how these countries score on the factors in the process and
the key positive or negative elements that we have taken into account. It also shows the
implementation into our main strategies (the Core strategy aims for a more diversified
portfolio and is managed relative to the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while the Stars
strategy aims for a more concentrated portfolio and has a benchmark-agnostic approach).
As to be expected, Korea is a large position for both strategies, while South Africa has a low
weight. The integrated approach is evident in the South Africa positioning. From a purely
top-down perspective, South Africa would qualify for a larger underweight position, but
because there is one large, attractive stock listed in South Africa which derives the vast
majority of its income from other countries, we choose to have a smaller underweight
South Korea
Macro Long Term + High level of investment, ranks high on competitiveness
Strong current account surplus, low budget deficit
Improving corporate governance
North Korea risk: large potential impact but very low probability
Macro Short Term 0 Strong growth in exports
Neutral monetary policy, potentially some small rate hikes
Potential Chaebol reform versus socialist policies of President Moon
North Korea will continue to create volatility
Earnings + Positive earnings revisions, outlook significantly improving
Valuation ++ One of the cheapest emerging countries
Technical 0 Neutral
Sentiment 0 On average GEM fund managers have a small underweight
Inflows into equity market from national pension fund NPS
Bottom-up check Neutral Wide range of good companies in which to invest, no need for adjustment
Portfolio positioning Core: overweight position of 5%
Stars: Large weight of 24%
For illustration purposes only
South Africa
Macro Long Term -- Low investment and savings, inflexible labor market
Structural current account deficit
Institutional quality on downward trend under Zuma government
Macro Short Term - Risk of downgrade in credit ratings
Risk of ANC succession in December and populist policies
Earnings -- Large negative earnings revisions across the board
Valuation - More expensive than the GEM average, also when corrected for sectors
Technical 0 Neutral
Sentiment 0 On average GEM fund managers have a small underweight
Local pension funds have a 25% limit on foreign investments
Bottom-up check + Naspers is an attractive stock. It is a holding company for Chinese internet
company Tencent and several other EM internet companies and trades at a
large discount to the sum of its parts
Portfolio positioning Core: underweight position of 1.5%, within South Africa a larger underweight
in domestic companies and a large position in Naspers
Stars: 3.5% position in Naspers only
For illustration purposes only
Country allocation has also made a positive contribution to performance of the Core
strategy. In the 90s, the fund was very successful in restricting losses during the Asian crisis,
and later also benefited from the strong recovery, for example, in 1999 and 2009.
We do not see country allocation as a stand-alone part of the process, but believe in an
integrated approach, where the insights gained from country analysis are also reflected
in stock selection and sector allocation within countries. Country allocation has made
a valuable contribution to our performance track record, and will therefore remain an
important part of the investment process.
Going forward, we believe in the words of Heraclitus, The only thing that is constant
is change. So we will keep on looking for countries with solid long-term potential, an
improving economic environment and earnings outlook, an attractive valuation and
supportive equity flows.
Additional Information for investors with residence or seat in the United Kingdom
Robeco is subject to limited regulation in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority are
available from us on request.
This document has not been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this document and any other document or material in
connection with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of Shares may not be circulated or distributed, nor may Shares be offered or sold, or be made
the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor under Section
304 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the SFA) or (ii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable
provision of the SFA.
Additional Information for investors with residence or seat in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), United Arab Emirates
Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. (Dubai Office), Office 209, Level 2, Gate Village Building 7, Dubai International Financial Centre, Dubai, PO Box 482060, UAE.
Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. (Dubai office) is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) and only deals with Professional Clients and
does not deal with Retail Clients as defined by the DFSA.