Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Co-organized by Takachar, Entrepreneurs Resource Center, and Y-Global; July 2013, Nairobi, Kenya
1. The
technology
1.1 Overview
of
the
process
The
green
charcoal
production
process
consists
of
four
key
steps.
First,
the
organic
waste
must
be
harvested
and
dried.
Second,
through
a
process
called
pyrolysis,
where
the
organic
waste
is
treated
at
an
elevated
temperature,
the
biomass
is
converted
into
a
black
charred
intermediate.
This
charred
intermediate
is
very
easy
to
crush
into
powder,
which,
in
the
third
step,
is
mixed
with
a
binder
and
compressed
into
briquettes.
Finally,
sufficient
packaging
and
marketing
effort
should
be
invested
in
order
to
make
sure
that
there
is
a
market
for
such
a
product.
The picture above illustrates the key steps in the charcoal process.
There
are
various
technologies
that
can
perform
pyrolysis.
Here,
we
focus
mostly
on
the
small-scale,
low-cost,
and
simple
technologies
that
have
a
wide
dissemination
potential.
Essentially,
nearly
all
pyrolysis
technologies
adhere
to
two
principles:
(1)
there
is
an
availability
of
dry
biomass
that
can
readily
be
lit
on
fire
and
releases
heat
for
the
pyrolysis
process
to
take
place,
and
(2)
there
is
sufficient
air
intake
control
so
that
pyrolysis
can
turn
biomass
into
char
as
opposed
to
ash.
Below,
we
describe
three
representative
technologies,
noting
that
there
are
more
that
have
been
developed
by
other
efforts.
The
first
type
was
developed
at
MITs
D-Lab
in
collaboration
with
its
partners.
This
kiln
consists
of
a
200-
L
oil
drum
that
has
a
top
opening
as
well
as
a
few
openings
at
the
bottom,
from
which
the
biomass
is
lit
(bottom-lit
design).
The
pyrolysis
time
is
about
20
minutes,
yielding
2
kg
of
charcoal
per
batch.
The
cost
of
the
kiln
is
about
1,500
Ksh/kiln,
with
the
downside
that
such
kiln
can
release
copious
amounts
of
smoke
during
pyrolysis.
An
open
drum
kiln,
of
the
MIT
D-Lab
design,
in
operation.
This
version
is
low-cost
but
the
downside
is
that
the
smoke
emission
during
carbonization
can
be
excessive,
as
seen
in
the
photo.
The
second
design,
known
here
as
the
top-lit
design,
was
developed
by
Takachar
in
response
to
the
need
to
reduce
the
smoke
released
during
pyrolysis.
This
kiln
also
is
based
on
a
200-L
oil
drum
concept,
but
has
an
adapter
and
a
chimney
that
direct
smoke
upwards.
In
addition,
unlike
the
bottom-lit
design
described
previously,
in
this
design,
biomass
is
lit
from
the
top
and
the
flame
eventually
reaches
the
bottom
of
the
kiln.
The
pyrolysis
time
is
also
about
20
minutes,
with
a
slightly
better
yield
than
the
bottom-lit
design.
The
advantage
is
that
the
design
releases
less
smoke,
under
windless
conditions
and
given
sufficiently
dry
feedstock.
The
kiln
costs
about
2,500
Ksh/kiln.
Finally,
the
third
design,
as
practiced
by
a
farmer
group
in
Mwea,
is
suitable
for
densely
packed
materials
such
as
rice
husk,
which
may
not
be
easily
carbonizable
using
the
two
designs
mentioned
above.
This
method
consists
of
a
chimney
(with
holes
in
its
wall)
which
is
lit
with
easily
flammable
biomass.
Then
a
dense
material
is
piled
around
the
chimney
so
that
all
the
holes
are
blocked.
The
pyrolysis
process,
in
this
case,
takes
longer
(up
to
1-2
hours),
but
there
is
also
more
biomass
that
can
be
carbonized
in
one
setting/batch.
The
kiln
costs
about
2,000
Ksh/kiln.
As
KEFRI
pointed
out,
there
are
also
other
pyrolysis
technologies
available
for
other
types
of
feedstock
(such
as
sawdust),
as
well
as
larger-scale
drums
(such
as
those
practiced
by
ARTI-Tanzania)
that
are
able
to
uniformly
carbonize
a
larger
batch
of
materials.
A
uniform
process
and
design
are
desired
in
the
effective
scaling
of
the
process,
and
a
technical
knowledge
pool
should
be
gathered
regarding
the
relationship
between
the
different
technologies
and
the
different
feedstock
types
in
order
to
facilitate
effective
training.
1.3 Briquetting
technologies
There
are
also
various
types
of
briquetting
technologies
available.
The
lowest-cost
press
consists
of
a
simple
manual
press
developed
by
MITs
D-Lab
which
consists
simply
of
three
metal
parts
welded
together.
This
press
costs
about
800
Ksh
to
make
in
the
jua
kali
sector,
and
when
operated
full
time
can
produce
about
40
kg/day
of
charcoal
briquettes.
More
expensive
hand-operated
presses
are
also
available,
such
as
those
marketed
by
the
Giraffe
Centre,
for
a
price
point
of
around
5,000
Ksh
to
20,000
Ksh.
A
larger-scale
production
will
call
for
electric
extruders,
which
typically
have
a
price
range
of
100,000
to
150,000
Ksh.
Such
extruders
require
electricity,
but
have
an
output
of
500-1000
kg/day
of
charcoal
briquettes.
When
investing
in
a
charcoal
production
process,
it
is
important
to
match
the
amount
of
available
waste
with
the
type
of
briquetting
technology
used,
so
that
operation
occurs
most
effectively.
Two
versions
of
the
manual
briquette
press,
costing
between
8,000
to
40,000
Ksh
apiece,
in
operation
at
the
Giraffe
Centre.
As
there
is
a
wide
variety
of
pyrolysis
and
briquetting
technologies
available,
there
are
also
many
binding
methods
to
press
charcoal
dust
into
briquettes.
Some
binders
range
from
cow
dung,
soil,
cassava,
gum
arabic,
to
some
more
proprietary
processes.
KEFRI
and
MITs
D-Lab
have
done
extensive
studies
on
the
appropriate
ratios
of
different
binders
to
make
optimal
briquettes.
Takachar
has
also
done
extensive
studies
on
the
effect
of
different
binders
on
the
emission
qualities
of
combusted
briquettes
(such
as
smoke
and
carbon
monoxide),
which
will
be
described
in
the
next
section.
As
mentioned
above,
both
MITs
D-Lab
and
Takachar
have
done
some
laboratory-grade
analysis
of
sample
charcoal
briquettes
to
ensure
the
safety
of
usage
in
a
household
level.
This
is
necessary
because
as
we
have
seen,
many
alternative
briquettes,
when
poorly
made,
can
have
undesirable
emissions
such
as
smoke
which
can
be
a
chronic
respiratory
health
hazard
when
inhaled
by
the
household
over
long
periods
of
time.
We
were
able
to
demonstrate
that,
given
the
proper
briquetting
technique,
the
amount
of
smoke
emitted
during
combustion
is
comparable
to
wood
charcoal,
which
is
minimal
compared
to
alternative
solid
fuels
such
as
firewood
and
some
other
varieties
of
non-carbonized
briquettes.
In
addition,
the
carbon
monoxide
emission
for
our
briquettes,
when
densely
packed
together,
is
considerably
less
compared
to
regular
wood
charcoal,
therefore
making
it
safer
to
use
in
a
household-
cooking
setting.
Comparison of particulate emission levels
7
A
comparison
of
particulate
emission
Takachar briquettes, Takachar recipe
Fragmented wood charcoal, Takachar recipe levels
over
the
course
of
the
combustion
6
Particulate emission level (mg m3)
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Combustion time (minutes)
700
200
100
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Combustion time (minutes)
One
of
the
highlights
of
the
morning
session
is
the
live
demonstration
of
the
carbonization
process,
by
one
farmer
from
Rumuruti
on
maize
husks/cobs,
as
well
as
two
farmers
from
Mwea
on
rice
husks,
using
two
different
technologies.
Tabitha Wangare, from Rumuruti, explained the carbonization process to the workshop attendants.
Matthew
Kamanu
and
Patrick
Muya,
from
Mwea,
demonstrated
the
carbonization
process
using
rice
husks
to
the
workshop
attendants.
After
the
charcoal
dust
is
produced
from
carbonized
biomass,
workshop
attendants
tried
their
hands
at
making
briquettes
using
a
simple
hand
press.
In
section
1,
we
have
discussed
at
length
about
the
different
options
and
approaches
regarding
the
charcoal-making
technologies
that
utilize
organic
waste.
In
this
section,
we
explore
how
such
technologies
can
fit
into
a
proper
commercialization
model
in
order
to
ensure
wide-scale
dissemination
and
social
impact.
Numerous
conference
participants
shared
their
experiences
with
briquettes,
which
are
summarized
below.
Giraffe
Centre:
The
Giraffe
Centre
supports
conservation/environmental
initiatives,
and
under
this
purview
it
trains
and
supports
various
groups
on
briquette-making
activities
from
waste.
One
common
feedstock,
for
example,
is
a
mix
of
paper
and
sawdust.
One
challenge
that
the
Giraffe
Centre
has
encountered
with
its
briquettes
is
that
they
release
tremendous
amounts
of
smoke,
which
makes
them
unsuitable
for
many
households
conditions
unless
a
new
jiko
is
designed
specifically
for
such
briquettes.
Takachar
has
been
working
with
the
Giraffe
Centre
to
establish
the
pyrolysis
technologies
in
order
to
improve
the
quality
of
briquettes,
and
currently
a
test
drum
kiln
is
being
housed
at
the
Giraffe
Centre,
which
has
graciously
agreed
to
provide
training
and
demonstration
for
the
technologies
on
behalf
of
Takachar.
Furthermore,
the
Giraffe
Centre
has
also
experienced
with
various
manually
operated
presses,
ranging
from
5000
to
40000
Ksh.
Notably,
the
Giraffe
Centre
publishes
a
booklet
on
briquetting
practices
Sample
briquettes
manufactured
by
the
for
the
different
groups
that
may
wish
to
be
engaged
Giraffe
Centre.
As
can
be
seen,
the
with
briquetting.
briquettes
were
not
carbonized
(judging
by
its
colour),
and
the
Giraffe
Centre
confirmed
that
these
briquettes
emitted
very
much
smoke,
which
made
them
unsuitable
for
indoor
cooking.
Inventors
and
Innovators
Association
of
Kenya
(IIAK):
IIAK
has
various
chapters
in
different
towns
in
Kenya.
It
develops
and
disseminates
various
innovations.
For
example,
one
focus
has
been
based
on
waste
management,
and
from
this
angle
IIAK
has
done
some
support
and
training
on
various
youth
groups
on
briquetting.
IIAK
echoes
some
similar
findings
about
briquette
quality
as
the
Giraffe
Centre.
Takachar
has
also
been
working
with
IIAK
to
become
a
centre
for
technical
innovation,
training,
and
demonstration,
especially
amongst
groups.
Carolina
for
Kibera
(CFK):
Carolina
for
Kibera,
in
partnership
with
Takachar,
trained
one
of
its
youth
groups
in
summer
2012
in
procuring
a
drum
pyrolysis
kiln
for
briquette
production.
The
project
collects
organic
waste
from
the
nearby
Toi
Market,
and
made
some
promising
headways
such
as
(1)
selling
the
product
to
households
at
a
rate
of
20
Ksh/kg,
(2)
being
demonstrated
at
the
Nairobi
International
Trade
Fair,
(3)
being
certified
by
the
Kenyan
Ministry
of
Agriculture,
and
(4)
being
invited
to
various
trainings
and
demonstrations.
The
main
challenges
with
this
project
include:
(1)
lack
of
access
to
a
high-
throughput
briquette
press,
and
this
limitation
restricts
the
scalability
of
the
production
unit;
(2)
without
sufficient
income
from
the
small-scale
briquetting
process,
the
youth
group
also
maintains
other
income-generating
activities
such
as
car-washing;
(3)
because
of
the
various
activities
that
may
compete
for
time,
there
is
an
overall
lack
of
bandwidth
to
troubleshoot
the
various
difficulties
that
arose
in
the
charcoal
production
process.
However,
recently
CFK
trained
another
youth
group
on
briquette-making
and
supported
the
group
in
getting
an
electric
extruder
press.
Currently
the
group
is
making
briquettes
from
charcoal
dust
and
beginning
to
market
to
the
local
households,
with
future
hopes
of
using
carbonized
materials
such
as
maize
cobs.
Moses
Ojwang,
standing,
from
Carolina
for
Kibera,
shared
his
experience
about
the
briquetting
project
undertaken
by
a
youth
group
that
he
worked
with
in
Kibera.
Sanchat
Trust:
The
Sanchat
Trust,
based
in
Gilgil,
has
done
some
innovative
work
on
briquetting.
Notably,
it
sources
charcoal
dust
from
nearby
places,
mixes
the
dust
with
paper
and
a
proprietary
binder,
and
presses
the
dust
into
briquettes
of
various
qualities.
The
fuelette
briquettes,
which
target
the
households,
are
of
the
highest
quality
in
terms
of
density
and
burning
characteristics,
and
are
made
by
increasing
the
binder
ratio.
Briquettes
sold
to
its
own
school,
lodges
in
Maasai
Mara,
and
a
temple
in
Nairobi
are
of
slightly
lower
quality,
which
involves
increasing
the
paper
content
in
the
briquettes.
The
current
production
level
is
around
several
tons
per
month,
with
an
ambitious
expansion
plan
to
more
than
100
tons/day
in
the
long
term.
This
is
expected
to
come
in
large
part
due
to
the
availability
of
biomass
in
the
form
of
rose
farm
waste.
World
Community
Students
for
Sustainable
Development:
This
organization
supports
and
trains
various
groups
in
green
initiatives.
It
has
had
experience
with
charcoal
briquette
production
in
the
past,
and
has
a
few
key
lessons
to
share.
Firstly,
in
order
to
reach
a
commercially
viable
scale,
a
production
capacity
of
at
least
500
kg/day
is
required.
If
the
youth
group
is
not
initially
set
up
at
this
level
with
the
right
technological
capacity,
then
it
is
likely
to
fail.
Ultimately,
many
members
of
the
youth
group
are
not
really
keen
in
using
labor-intensive
methods
of
briquetting
if
there
is
a
higher-throughput
method
available.
However,
the
difficulty
is
that
in
order
to
access
technologies
at
scale,
considerable
amount
of
investment
is
needed,
and
the
youth
group
may
not
be
in
a
position
to
make
this
investment.
In
its
view,
sufficient
incubation
and
resources
need
to
be
input
to
a
youth
group
to
set
up
the
briquetting
operation
at
a
commercial
scale
in
order
to
succeed.
Kenya
Forest
Research
Institute
(KEFRI):
KEFRI
has
done
some
extensive
research
and
promotion
in
terms
of
green
charcoal
production,
both
from
various
types
of
biomass,
as
well
as
from
sustainably
harvested
plants
(such
as
bamboo).
Resources
are
available
to
match
different
types
of
biomass
to
different
types
of
pyrolysis
technologies,
and
training
is
available
to
facilitate
setting
up
of
the
process.
Likewise,
KEFRI
has
done
some
extensive
work
characterizing
binder
ratios
and
the
resultant
calorific
value
of
the
briquettes.
KEFRI
believes
that
the
briquette
market
is
large,
but
the
lack
of
a
standard
makes
proper
marketing
and
sales
difficult.
A
household,
for
example,
can
become
jaded
by
a
product
if
the
behavior
changes
from
day
to
day.
Therefore,
a
standard
is
needed
not
only
in
terms
of
briquette
quality/density,
but
also
in
terms
of
the
various
technologies,
if
possible.
Nellie
Oduor,
the
Deputy
Centre
Director
at
the
Kenya
Forest
Research
Institute
(KEFRI),
spoke
about
the
research
and
implementation
initiatives
undertaken
by
KEFRI,
and
underscored
the
need
to
standardize
the
briquetting
industry.
Economic
Projects
Trust
Fund
(EPTF):
EPTF
incubates
various
enterprises
by
providing
an
office
space
and
entrepreneurship
training,
including
potentially
those
which
may
involve
briquette-making
and
selling.
Takachar
undertook
a
broad
market
survey
in
East
Africa
of
various
prominent
briquetting
enterprises,
and
described
the
learning
from
the
different
operations.
Chardust:
Based
in
Nairobi,
Kenya,
and
started
in
1999,
Chardust
takes
charcoal
dust
and
converts
it
into
fuel
briquettes
at
a
scale
of
8
tons/day
currently.
Chardust
has
in
the
past
experimented
with
carbonizing
various
organic
wastes
to
make
charcoal
dust,
but
has
been
unsuccessful
due
to
technical
issues.
Currently
charcoal
dust
is
still
relatively
easy
to
procure,
though
the
process
is
becoming
more
and
more
competitive
as
more
groups
are
starting
to
use
the
dust.
The
briquettes
are
sold
for
about
700
Ksh
in
a
50-kg
gunea
bag.
The
customers
are
mostly
supermarkets,
restaurants,
and
poultry
farmers.
Attempts
in
the
past
with
selling
at
the
household
level
has
not
been
successful.
Green
Bio
Energy:
Based
in
Kampala,
Uganda,
and
started
in
2011,
Green
Bio
Energy
currently
produces
6-8
tons
of
briquettes
from
charcoal
dust.
According
to
the
company,
the
minimal
profitable
level
of
production
is
around
1-2
tons/day.
Currently
its
customers
are
a
mix
of
hotels,
poultry
farms,
supermarkets,
petrol
stations,
and
households,
and
it
is
experimenting
with
a
franchising
model
to
sell
its
branded
product,
briketi.
A
50-kg
bag
of
charcoal
sells
for
about
1200
Ksh.
While
Green
Bio
Energy
does
not
currently
use
carbonized
biomass
for
its
briquette
production,
it
envisions
doing
so
in
the
intermediate
future,
and
believes
that
there
is
a
positive
profit
margin
in
this
process
(albeit
less
when
compared
to
sourcing
charcoal
dust
directly).
AEST:
Based
in
Soroti,
Uganda,
and
started
in
2009,
AEST
engages
rural
farmers
to
produce
briquettes
from
carbonized
agricultural
wastes.
It
has
a
main
distribution
centre
near
the
production
site,
but
also
has
three
outlets
near
markets.
It
delivers
only
in
large
volumes
to
hotels/schools,
which
accounts
for
25%
of
the
customer
segment.
The
other
75%
consists
of
about
250
households.
For
the
households,
one
key
lesson
is
that
price
trumps
quality
in
terms
of
briquettes.
The
product
is
offered
at
800
Ksh
per
50-kg
bag.
Wildlife
Works:
Based
in
Mombasa,
Kenya,
the
operation
uses
twigs
and
tree
trimmings
to
carbonize
into
briquettes,
which
are
sold
to
houses
(10%)
and
hotels/lodges
(90%).
Hotels
have
a
delivery
of
about
30
kg/week.
For
households,
the
key
lesson
is
that
price
trumps
briquette
quality.
However,
Wildlife
Works
is
able
to
charge
institutions
(such
as
lodges)
a
premium
price
even
higher
than
charcoal,
most
likely
citing
the
environmental
and
social
benefits.
The
organization
does
not
distribute
its
briquettes.
Rather,
customers
come
to
it.
The
production
level
is
around
500
kg/day.
Envodev:
Based
in
Moundou,
Chad,
and
started
in
2010,
this
organization
sources
raw
materials
40
km
away
from
production.
The
carbonized
biomass
is
then
briquetted
and
sold
to
households
(90%)
as
well
as
shops/hotels
(10%)
within
a
5-10
km
range
(delivery
is
made
using
a
pushcart).
Envodev
found
that
the
greatest
industry
in
Chad
for
the
briquette
demand
is
brick-making.
In
general,
the
demand
for
the
briquettes
greatly
outstrips
the
supply,
and
currently
the
production
seems
limited
by
the
availability
of
binders.
Merchants
often
buy
briquettes
from
Envodev
and
sell
these
in
the
urban
centres.
The
product
prices
are
such
that
the
briquettes
fetch
about
1700
Ksh/bag
in
Moundou
and
6500
Ksh/bag
in
NDjamena.
Because
the
Chadian
government
outlawed
the
use
of
wood-derived
briquettes,
the
prices,
as
seen
above,
are
very
high.
Envirocoal:
Based
in
Kampala,
Uganda,
the
organization
sources
its
feedstock
from
two
sources:
in
rural
areas,
this
comes
from
carbonized
agricultural
biomass,
and
in
urban
areas,
this
comes
from
charcoal
dust.
Both
types
are
briquetted
and
sold
in
sales
centres,
where
most
customers
come.
There
are
also
trucks
that
sell
directly
to
customers
within
a
10-km
radius,
which
include
households
(45%),
restaurants
(30%),
schools
(15%),
and
supermarkets
(10%).
The
popular
marketing
strategy
involves
giving
free
samples
to
households
to
try.
Each
briquette
is
priced
at
100
UGX
in
urban
areas
and
50
UGX
in
rural
areas,
which
represents
about
50%
the
price
of
regular
wood
charcoal.
Eco-Fuel:
Based
in
Kampala,
Uganda,
Eco-Fuel
was
started
2-3
years
ago
by
a
Ugandan
entrepreneur.
The
business
model
consists
as
follows:
Eco-Fuel
leases
kilns
to
farmers,
and
provides
training
on
operating
the
kilns.
The
farmers
pay
back
over
time,
and
eventually
the
kilns
belong
to
them.
The
farmers
carbonize
their
own
biomass
and
sell
the
charcoal
dust
to
micro-franchises
which
make
briquettes
(the
training
is
once
again
provided
by
Eco-Fuel
Africa).
Then
Eco-Fuel
Africa
centralizes
the
briquettes
for
sale
via
women
retailers
to
final
consumers.
ARTI-Tanzania:
ARTI-TZ
uses
a
similar
business
model
as
Eco-Fuel
Africa.
So
far,
ARTI-TZ
has
trained
over
700
rural
farmers
in
operating
kilns
for
pyrolysis.
The
kilns
come
in
various
flavors.
According
to
Gideon
Mandara,
recently
ARTI
has
abandoned
the
large-scale
pyrolysis
kilns
in
favor
of
single-drum
kilns.
The
charcoal
dust
is
then
purchased
from
the
network
of
farmers
and
briquetted
at
a
centralized
location.
The
briquettes
sell
for
about
800
Ksh
per
25-kg
bag.
By
September
2013,
ARTI
expects
to
have
a
8
tons/day
capacity.
ARTI-TZ
has
agreed
to
do
a
training
in
Nairobi
on
setting
up
a
green
charcoal
production
operation
in
the
near
future.
From
the
discussions
in
the
two
sections
above,
there
are
some
key
lessons
which
we
can
draw
from
the
commercialization
strategies
to
date.
In
terms
of
customers,
households
prefer
high-quality,
high-priced
briquettes
which
are
also
perceived
to
last
longer
and
cook
more
meals.
However,
in
selling
the
briquettes
to
the
households,
the
price
per
perceived
weight
unit
makes
the
most
important
factor
in
product
acceptance.
On
the
other
hand,
hotels/industries
place
a
smaller
emphasis
on
quality,
and
rather
are
looking
for
a
product
that
is
low-cost.
Therefore,
any
briquettes
targeted
towards
this
market
segment
must
be
able
to
compete
with
the
current
wood
charcoal
wholesale
price
and
must
be
able
to
deliver
to
the
hotels/industries
(which
is
the
current
practice).
Ultimately,
it
is
clear
that
the
urban
market
often
has
a
price
premium
due
to
both
the
higher
demand
and
the
scarcity
of
trees
nearby,
which
makes
this
market
potentially
easier
to
enter
to
make
an
initial
profitable
case.
In
terms
of
operations
and
scaling,
there
are
two
key
facts
which
affect
the
commercialization
strategy.
Firstly,
kilns
can
be
made
cheap
to
invest
and
operate,
which
make
them
able
to
be
widely
disseminated
to
various
groups/individuals
in
close
proximity
to
waste.
This
disseminated
kiln
approach
is
also
prefer
to
an
approach
where
the
organic
waste
is
first
centralized
then
carbonized,
because
transportation
of
the
bulky
waste
(as
opposed
to
the
charcoal
dust)
can
add
greatly
to
the
production
cost.
The
second
fact
is
that
if
high-quality
briquettes
are
desired,
then
briquette
presses
are
expensive.
Such
presses
cannot
be
easily
invested
by
groups
that
have
the
power
to
own
and
operate
a
pyrolysis
kiln.
Therefore,
there
should
be
a
centralized
location
where
the
carbonized
charcoal
dust
from
various
groups/individuals
can
be
gathered
and
briquetted.
This
centralized
briquetting
also
ensures
quality
control
as
well
as
uniform
branding/marketing,
which
increases
the
likelihood
of
product
acceptance.
In
consideration
of
the
key
lessons
as
summarized
above
in
the
previous
section,
we
propose
for
consideration
a
micro-enterprise
model
for
the
dissemination
of
green
charcoal
production.
This
model
consists
of
some
key
features:
(a) Decentralized
pyrolysis:
Kilns
are
distributed
(or
leased,
with
some
financing
model
in
place)
to
individuals
or
groups
living
in
close
proximity
to
waste,
so
that
it
almost
costs
them
nothing
except
labor
to
carbonize
the
waste
into
char.
The
individuals/groups
sell
the
char
to
the
briquetting
facility,
thereby
gaining
some
income
from
the
organic
waste
that
is
otherwise
unmanaged.
(b) Collection
of
char:
The
char
is
then
collected
and
centralized
to
a
briquetting
facility.
(c) Briquetting
facility:
The
briquetting
facility
produces
at
least
500
kg/day
of
charcoal
dust
into
high-quality
and
branded
briquettes
for
distribution
into
urban
areas.
(d) Marketing
and
sales:
Anchors
in
specific
communities/customers
will
assist
in
the
sales
of
such
briquettes.
We
see
each
micro-enterprise
as
consisting
of
a
briquetting
facility
and
a
network
of
kiln
operators
who
supply
the
charcoal
dust.
A
city
such
as
Nairobi
or
Dar
es-Salaam
can
easily
support
at
least
5-10
of
such
operations.
Each
micro-enterprise
model
is
sufficient
to
support
one
micro-entrepreneur
as
well
as
3-4
workers
hired,
in
addition
to
the
network
of
farmers/waste
groups
that
can
increase
their
income
by
supplying
the
charcoal
dust.
Over
time,
as
this
mode
of
production
grows
and
spreads,
we
will
aim
to
create
a
conducive
environment
for
the
proper
incubation,
start-up,
and
certification/commissioning
of
such
groups
in
new
sites,
through
resource
mobilization
and
key
partnerships.
Ultimately,
if
such
micro-enterprises
spread,
then
what
we
can
offer
is
(1)
a
network/platform
for
coordinated
learning
and
training,
(2)
a
branded
variety
of
technologies
(kilns
and
presses)
for
such
groups
to
invest
in.
Takachars
offering
during
this
session
is
to
provide
the
resources
to
support
the
initial
incubation
and
start-up
support
of
one
or
two
such
micro-enterprises.
In
recognition
that
as
a
new
industry,
this
enterprise
may
represent
a
risky
proposition
to
the
micro-entrepreneurs,
Takachar
offers
to
pay
such
entrepreneurs
an
initial
6-month
stipend
to
enable
him/her
to
solely
focus
on
building
the
enterprise
and
generating
revenue
for
sustainability.
Takachar
also
offers
the
oversight
of
a
project
coordinator
so
that
the
learning
from
the
start-up
process
can
be
properly
captured
and
documented.
After
a
period,
it
is
expected
that
the
micro-enterprise
should
generate
enough
profit
to
pay
the
entrepreneur
without
an
external
stipend.
The
workshop
participants
grouped
together
for
a
photograph
with
a
carbonization
kiln
at
the
end
of
the
workshop