Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Engineering Package
By Ryan Carter, Aaron Blender, Sandy Routledge, Anh Vo, Sowmya Yelakanti
Introduction (Ryan)
The dimethyl ether (DME) production process functions to produce DME and water from
gaseous methanol reacted over an amorphous silica impregnated alumina catalyst. Product exiting the
reactor is then separated by two distillation towers into DME, water, and unreacted methanol
components. The water is sent to treatment, the unreacted methanol is recycled back into the reactor,
Recently, ethanol was mistakenly added to the methanol storage tank TK-4401. TK-4401
normally contains methanol and a small fraction of water, but now contains 5 mol% ethanol, 0.9 mol%
water and 94.1 mol% methanol . DME must be produced at the desired 99.5 wt% purity, meaning that
ethanol contamination must be dealt with. Several options exist for the removal of ethanol. The
decommissioned solvent processing area, Unit 1100, can be recommissioned and distillation tower T-
1104 can be used to separate the methanol, ethanol, and water prior to entering the DME production
block. Alternatively, the impure methanol from tank TK-4401 can be sent directly to the DME production
block and the reactor respectively. Ethanol enters into a competing reaction with methanol and
produces diethyl ether and ethylene in addition to the standard DME and water that is produced. The
last major option to deal with the contaminated methanol is to send the impure methanol off-site to be
Regardless of what solution is chosen, the DME process is scheduled to start-up within ten days,
so any modifications to the plant must be accomplished within that time frame. Piping to and
reactivation of solvent block 1100 can be accomplished in less than two days, leaving eight days to
configure the new process if it is decided not to send the impure methanol offsite to be processed.
faculty where it is going to cost $0.05 per pound for purification (and transportation?).This cost includes
3
the transportation charges as well. The cost to purify the impure mixture of 400,000 gallons is
$131,569.55. The ethanol from the purification would is going to be sold back to Drift Engineering, since
ethanol can be used onsite. It makes more sense to keep it ourselves and sell it to the process unit, than
to sell it to another company. Also because the DME faculty does not contain any means or equipment
to denature the ethanol so that it can be sold offsite. Selling the ethanol back to Drift Engineering would
is then going to be sold at a price of $0.35 per kilogram, which comes out to be a profit of $20,835.45.
The methanol is then going to be put back into the methanol storage tank and then ran through the
process as before.
mixture to the reactor, and separate out the products downstream. The simulation was run with
ASPEN. The reactor was a RPLUG model and all three towers that were used were RADFRAC models.
The use of the decommissioned column T-1104 and the associated equipment were placed right
after the reactor. This tower has the largest diameter, 2.2 meters and 59 trays, the largest amount. After
looking at the volatilities of the six components coming from the reactor; ethylene, dimethyl ether
(DME), and diethyl ether (DEE) came out of the distillate, while water, ethanol, and methanol came out
of the bottoms of the column. The condenser E-1105 was made into a partial vapor-liquid condenser to
allow the ethylene to be removed from the distillate. for easier separation and more pure products
later downstream. The distillate was sent to tower T-201, to separate DME from DEE. And the bottoms
were sent to tower T-202 to separate the excess water from the unreacted methanol and ethanol. In
tower T-201, DME would come off the distillate and DEE would come out of the bottoms. In tower T-
202, the excess water was taken out of the bottoms and sent to waste water, while the remaining
components would come off the distillate and sent back in front of the reactor as a recycle.
4
Some problems that arose were mainly in the separation of the DME, DEE, and ethylene. The
reactor gave about a 20% of single pass conversion of the ethanol. Due to the kinetics that was (were?)
given about the conversion of ethanol to DEE and ethanol to ethylene, this caused a small amount of
DEE and ethylene being produced. The first major issue encountered was it was difficult (the difficulty?)
in separating the ethylene out of the vapor steam of the reflux drum in tower T-1104. A large amount of
DME was being taken with the ethylene due to their close volatilities. The second major issue was in
tower T-201, separating DME from DEE. The products DME and DEE had to have a purity of 99.5 mol% to
be able to sell them to a customer. In running the tower to produce that high purity caused the tower to
dry up. There was not enough material running through the column to achieve that high purity. It was
possible to purify the DME to 99.5 mol%. But in doing this case, a lot of DME was sent out to the
bottoms as well, thus not having pure DEE and wasting a large amount of DME.
pure ethanol would have not started until all of the impure ethanol/methanol impurity had been run
through Unit 1100. The ethanol that was separated in Unit 1100 would have been placed in a storage
tank for holding and then piping run from that tank to the Unit 200 process. The methanol would have
been placed in a pure methanol tank as well. The idea was to run a campaign of ethanol for a certain
amount of time, producing DEE and ethylene. And then switch back to methanol to produce DME. The
switching between feedstocks would primarily come from production orders. This scenario was run in
ASPEN using the RADFRAC simulation method. The products from the reactor were sent to tower T-201,
to separate DEE and ethylene in the distillate, and water and the unreacted ethanol in the bottoms.
There were a few problems that were encountered while running this simulation. The pure
ethanol was fed into the same model as scenario 4, which is later discussed, the same process from the
text. The first problem that arose was the reaction of ethanol to ethylene was endothermic and slowed
5
the reaction rates for both reactions, causing very little products to be formed. To overcome this
problem, the heat exchangers upstream need to increase the ethanols temperature from 250C to
350C, so that the reaction rates would have a high enough temperature to be able to create products.
Unit 1100. This scenario would be a separate unit operation running alongside Unit 200. Both the
methanol process flow diagram (PFD), Figure 1, and impure methanol/ethanol separation PFD, Figure 2,
were used using ASPEN software, utilizing RADFRAC models for the towers. Tower details such as
diameters, tray sizes, and efficiencies, were given information for towers, T-1104, T-201, and T-202. The
property method in the ASPEN simulation was chosen to be NRTL. The two reasons for choosing this
property method were that NRTL gave binary interaction parameters (BIPs) and that NRTL is a good
The methanol process will remain the same, taking in pure methanol from storage and running
through Unit 200 and producing pure DME at 99.7 wt%. To achieve 80% single pass convergence
required the inlet into the process to be increased from 262.2 kmol/hr to 297.45 kmol/ hr. The other
constraint was to keep the waste water with no organics in the stream. Table 1 shows the flow summary
The impurity methanol tank would be fed directly to Unit 1100. In Unit 1100, the tower and
other associated equipment will be brought back to working condition. The impure feed will be sent to
tower T-1104. The distillate will be pure methanol containing 129 parts per billion (PPM) of water and
266 parts per million (PPM) as shown in Table 2. The bottoms will have pure ethanol with 100PPM of
6
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Temperature [C] 25.00 41.60 154.00 250.00 373.76 278.00 100.00 92.54 45.74 150.30 137.76 99.07 167.01 100.06 100.06
Pressure bar 15.5 15.5 15.1 14.7 13.9 13.8 13.4 10.4 10.3 10.5 7.4 7.3 7.6 15.5 15.5
Vapor Frac 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.126 0.187 0 0 0.05 0 0 0 0
Mole Flow 297.45 372.83 372.83 372.83 372.84 372.84 372.84 372.84 147.25 225.59 225.59 75.38 150.20 75.38 75.38
[kmol/hr]
Mass Frac
METHANOL 0.995 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.197 0.197 0.197 0.197 0.003 0.452 0.452 0.949 0.009 0.949 0.949
WATER 0.005 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.228 0.228 0.228 0.228 16 PPM 0.529 0.529 0.011 0.991 0.011 0.011
DME 0.000 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.575 0.575 0.575 0.575 0.997 0.019 0.019 0.040 0.000 0.040 0.040
Mole Frac
METHANOL 0.990 0.983 0.983 0.983 0.196 0.196 0.196 0.196 0.005 0.322 0.322 0.952 0.005 0.952 0.952
WATER 0.010 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.405 0.405 0.405 0.405 39 PPM 0.669 0.669 0.020 0.995 0.020 0.020
DME 0.000 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.399 0.399 0.399 0.399 0.995 0.009 0.009 0.028 0.000 0.028 0.028
7
Figure 2- Process Flow Diagram for Methanol/Ethanol Seperation Process in Unit 1100
17 18 19
Temperature C 25 64.20 86.97
Pressure bar 15 1 1.42
Vapor Frac 0 0 0
Mole Flow 100 94.12 5.88
kmol/hr
Mass Frac
METHANOL 0.924 1.000 100 PPM
WATER 0.005 72 PPB 0.066
ETHANOL 0.071 382 PPM 0.934
Mole Frac
METHANOL 0.941 1.000 130 PPM
WATER 0.009 129 PPB 0.153
ETHANOL 0.050 266 PPM 0.847
8
methanol and 6.6 wt% of water. The distillate will be sent back to a pure methanol storage tank for later
processing. The bottoms will be sent to Tk-4409 and sold back to Drift Engineering. A flow summary
A composition profile of the components is shown in Figure 3 and a temperature profile of the
column is shown in Figure 4. These figures had shown the behavior of the tertiary system throughout
the column. The temperature of the column increases monotonically from the condenser to the
reboiler. Plateaus are beginning to form near the condenser and the reboiler as the separations become
more and more pure. For this system the light key (LK) is methanol, and the heavy key (HK) is ethanol.
The final component water is a non-heavy key (NHK). Above the feed stage the separation is very easy,
between methanol and ethanol. Further down the column, since there is very little methanol, the
separation is between ethanol and water. The slight decrease is ethanol composition near the reboiler is
due to the lack of methanol, the composition of ethanol and water is headed toward an azetropic
mixture. The plateaus forming at the reboiler with all the ethanol and the condenser with all the
methanol, show that the two components are gradually becoming more and more pure. The behavior
that these figures do not show is a plateau in which the stages are not performing any further
separations. This would indicate that those stages would not be needed for the column.
For the process in which ethanol and methanol were sent to the reactor simultaneously, an
ASPEN reactor simulation and a POLYMATH simulation were created. In both simulations, 85.5 mol/s of
methanol are sent to the reactor in addition to 4.56 mol/s of ethanol and 2.955 mol/s of water. Feed
and product in both reactors was vapor. Both reactors were modeled as adiabatic packed beds. Heat of
reaction was taken into account, but pressure drop due to the resistance of the catalyst was not.
Reactant conversion in both reactors was nearly identical, but the POLYMATH reactor required a higher
feed temperature to achieve desired conversion and the effluent exits the POLYMATH reactor at a
higher temperature. Feed entering the ASPEN model was 250C and exited at 374.4C but feed entering
10
the POLYMATH reactor had to be set to 270.75C, and effluent exited the reactor at 413C. This
discrepancy although slight, is significant, as catalyst decay occurs after 400C and selectivity is
decreased as temperature increases. The cause of the discrepancy is unknown; both reactors had the
activation energy for all three reactions set the same value. The only variables that ASPEN could have
calculated differently are the heats of reaction and heat capacities. It is most likely that ASPEN is using
different mean heat capacities and more accurate heats of formation to calculate the heat of reaction.
New equipment
A pumping system has been designed for the ethanol/methanol distillation step occurring in T-
1104. The ethanol bottoms from T-1104 were sent to the storage tank TK- 4409.The methanol distillate
was pumped to TK-4402. The slop tank was filled with methanol in order to support the DME
manufacturing process because TK- 4402 is receiving the methanol distillate from T-1104 and the tank
Pump P-4403A was normally used to pump methanol from TK4401 to V-201. However, it was
incapable of pumping pure methanol from TK-4401 to T-1104. The suction pressure at the inlet of the
pump is 1.01 bar and the discharge pressure required to overcome vertical and frictional pressure losses
in the 1.5 line is 3.96 bar. P-4403A is only capable of a maximum pressure head of 1.2 bar, much less
than the 2.95 bar the pump is required to add to the line. The volumetric flow rate was calculated to be
1.14 L/sec. Based on these required specifications for the TK-4401 to T-1104 pumping system, the Helix
The second pumping system pumps pure methanol distillate from T-1104 to T- 4402 and
simultaneously refluxes methanol back into the tower at the designed reflux rate. For this pumping
system, an already installed pump, P-1107A, is to be used. The pump is able to produce a volumetric
flow rate of 3.651 L/sec at a pressure of just under 4 bar. This allows P-1107A to handle reflux and
11
distillate flow rates. The pressure generated is more than adequate to transfer the methanol to TK-4402
The third pumping system pumps ethanol distillate from T-1104 to TK-4409. For this pumping
system, it was decided to use pump P-1107B with a variable frequency drive to transfer the fluid inside a
1 line. The suction head at the inlet of the pump is the same as the pressure of the fluid exiting the
reboiler and is 1.42 bar; the discharge pressure at the outlet is 1.944 bar. The volumetric flow rate was
calculated to be 0.09277 L/sec. The temperature of the ethanol exiting the reboiler is 87C and the fluid
boils at 0.9479 bar at that given temperature. This is significant because it makes it essential to maintain
the reboiler pressure well above atmospheric pressure or risk cavitation, as the NPSH is only .4721 bar.
The required NPSH of the pump is not known at these flow rates so it is also essential to monitor this
pump when it is first brought online. The total head to be added by the pump was calculated to be 0.524
bar, which was the discharge head minus the suction head.
The last pumping system pumps methanol from TK-4410 to the main methanol line that leads to
V-201. Pump P-4403A that was removed from TK-4401 will be used in this system. This worked because
the same volumetric flow rate, the suction head and the discharge head were used in both systems.
Piping arrangement
12
Figure 5
In order to do scenario 4 there has to be a lot of re-piping done. The sections that need to be piped are
as follows: impure methanol storage tank to tower 1104 (blue line), pump 1107 A to the pure methanol
storage tank (green line), pump 1107 B to the pure ethanol storage tank (red line), and the slop tank to
the feed line that goes to vessel 201 (orange line). The cost to re-pipe can be seen in the table x below,
Table 3
Pipe Diameter $/ft Total Length (ft) time (hr) Wage ($/hr) Total cost
1" 16 185 18.5 35 ($3,607.50)
1.5" 17 1130 113 35 ($23,165.00)
2" 18 200 20 35 ($4,300.00)
total ($31,072.50)
13
Economics (Sandy)
Scenarios 2 and 3 demonstrate the highest yields for a profit; however due to the separations
involved with DEE and Ethylene where a failure occurred due to the fact that no simulation could
properly separate the two components into the proper purities needed to be sold. In conclusion, neither
scenario 2 or 3 is a viable option simply because the separations involved couldnt be done. Scenario 4 is
possible, but the cost of the re-piping needed and the utilities cost of running the equipment in the
solvent process unit 1100 is higher than the Toller cost. The overall cost of the utilities, the re-piping,
and the profit gained from the DME and ethanol sold to Drift Engineering came out to be $617,068.26.
The cost of scenario 1 which includes the Toller charge and the profit gained form the DME and ethanol
came out to be $655,420.19. So after much deliberation, the most economical scenario is scenario 1
Table 4
Rank Scenario Defination Net Profit Material & Labor Equipment Operating Gross Profit
1 1 Offsite purification $786,989.74 $0.00 $0.00 ($131,569.55) $655,420.19
4 2 Purification after Reactor $812,577.91 ($31,072.50) ($8,575.00) N/a N/a
3 3 Campaign Method $812,577.91 ($31,072.50) ($8,575.00) N/a N/a
2 4 Purification before Reactor $786,989.74 ($31,072.50) ($8,575.00) ($130,273.97) $617,068.27
Conclusion (Ryan)
Recommendations (Ryan)
14
Appendix
I. ASPEN Methanol Process Simulation
a. ASPEN Input Summary
b. ASPEN Block Report
II. ASPEN Methanol/Ethanol Separation
a. ASPEN Input Summary
b. ASPEN Block Report
III. Polymath Reactor Hand Calculations
IV. Pump Hand Calculations
a. Pump 1 P-1107B
b. Pump 2 P-4403C
V. Confidentiality Statement
15
;Input Summary created by Aspen Plus Rel. 24.0 at 17:01:26 Sat Nov 3, 2012
;Directory Filename C:\Users\1886261\AppData\Local\Temp\~ap1156.txt
;
DYNAMICS
DYNAMICS RESULTS=ON
SIM-OPTIONS OLD-DATABANK=YES
DESCRIPTION "
General Simulation with Metric Units :
C, bar, kg/hr, kmol/hr, Gcal/hr, cum/hr.
COMPONENTS
METHANOL CH4O /
ETHANOL C2H6O-2 /
WATER H2O /
DME C2H6O-1 /
DEE C4H10O-5 /
ETHYL C2H4
FLOWSHEET
BLOCK E-201 IN=3 OUT=4
BLOCK R-201 IN=5 OUT=6
BLOCK E-202 IN=4 OUT=5
BLOCK E-TEMP IN=6 OUT=7
BLOCK E-203 IN=7 OUT=8
16
PROPERTIES NRTL
PROP-DATA NRTL-1
IN-UNITS MET VOLUME-FLOW='cum/hr' ENTHALPY-FLO='Gcal/hr' &
HEAT-TRANS-C='kcal/hr-sqm-K' PRESSURE=bar TEMPERATURE=C &
VOLUME=cum DELTA-T=C HEAD=meter MOLE-DENSITY='kmol/cum' &
MASS-DENSITY='kg/cum' MOLE-ENTHALP='kcal/mol' &
MASS-ENTHALP='kcal/kg' HEAT=Gcal MOLE-CONC='mol/l' &
PDROP=bar
PROP-LIST NRTL
BPVAL METHANOL ETHANOL 4.711900000 -1162.294900 .3000000000 &
0.0 0.0 0.0 20.00000000 78.40000000
BPVAL ETHANOL METHANOL -2.312700000 483.8436000 .3000000000 &
0.0 0.0 0.0 20.00000000 78.40000000
BPVAL METHANOL WATER -.6930000000 172.9871000 .3000000000 &
0.0 0.0 0.0 24.99000000 100.0000000
BPVAL WATER METHANOL 2.732200000 -617.2687000 .3000000000 &
0.0 0.0 0.0 24.99000000 100.0000000
BPVAL METHANOL DME 0.0 653.0063000 .2951000000 0.0 0.0 &
0.0 0.0 0.0
BPVAL DME METHANOL 0.0 -18.93720000 .2951000000 0.0 0.0 &
0.0 0.0 0.0
BPVAL METHANOL DEE 7.077900000 -1999.472200 .3000000000 0.0 &
0.0 0.0 25.01000000 64.50000000
BPVAL DEE METHANOL -5.255600000 1893.486000 .3000000000 0.0 &
0.0 0.0 25.01000000 64.50000000
BPVAL ETHANOL WATER -.8009000000 246.1800000 .3000000000 &
0.0 0.0 0.0 24.99000000 100.0000000
BPVAL WATER ETHANOL 3.457800000 -586.0809000 .3000000000 &
0.0 0.0 0.0 24.99000000 100.0000000
BPVAL ETHANOL DEE 11.74670000 -3421.437500 .3000000000 0.0 &
0.0 0.0 20.00000000 76.60000000
BPVAL DEE ETHANOL -11.28370000 3706.990000 .3000000000 0.0 &
0.0 0.0 20.00000000 76.60000000
BPVAL WATER DEE 107.1788000 -6697.944300 .2000000000 0.0 &
-14.31080000 0.0 -3.830000000 95.00000000
BPVAL DEE WATER -43.36500000 3154.522900 .2000000000 0.0 &
6.030700000 0.0 -3.830000000 95.00000000
STREAM 2
SUBSTREAM MIXED TEMP=25. PRES=15.5 MOLE-FLOW=262.2
17
DESIGN-SPEC DS-1
DEFINE MEOH5 MOLE-FLOW STREAM=5 SUBSTREAM=MIXED &
COMPONENT=METHANOL
DEFINE MEOH6 MOLE-FLOW STREAM=6 SUBSTREAM=MIXED &
COMPONENT=METHANOL
SPEC "(MEOH5-MEOH6)/MEOH5" TO ".8"
TOL-SPEC ".001"
VARY STREAM-VAR STREAM=2 SUBSTREAM=MIXED VARIABLE=MOLE-FLOW
LIMITS "200" "800"
EO-CONV-OPTI
TOTAL BALANCE
MOLE(KMOL/HR ) 328.500 328.500 0.00000
MASS(KG/HR ) 10819.1 10819.1 0.00000
ENTHALPY(GCAL/HR ) -15.1879 -14.7365 -0.297209E-01
FLASH SPECIFICATIONS:
NPHASE 2
MAX NUMBER OF ITERATIONS 30
23
FLASH SPECIFICATIONS:
NPHASE 2
MAX NUMBER OF ITERATIONS 30
CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE 0.000100000
REACTOR TYPE:
ADIABATIC
VAPOR FLUID PHASE
REACTOR TUBE LENGTH METER 7.2000
REACTOR DIAMETER METER 0.72000
REACTOR RISE METER 0.0000
NUMBER OF REACTOR TUBES 1
REACTOR VOLUME CUM 2.9315
PRESSURE DROP OPTION: SPECIFIED
LIQUID HOLDUP OPTION: NO-SLIP
ERROR TOLERANCE 0.10000E-03
INTEGRATION METHOD GEAR
CORRECTOR METHOD NEWTON
INITIAL STEP SIZE FACTOR 0.10000E-01
CORRECTOR TOLERANCE FACTOR 0.10000
MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STEPS 1000
STOICHIOMETRY:
REACTION NUMBER: 1
SUBSTREAM: MIXED
METHANOL -2.0000 WATER 1.0000 DME 1.0000
REAC-DATA ENTRIES:
RATE PARAMETERS:
POWERLAW EXPONENTS:
25
REACTION NUMBER: 1
SUBSTREAM: MIXED
METHANOL 1.0000
**********************
**** INPUT DATA ****
**********************
27
NUMBER OF STAGES 24
ALGORITHM OPTION STANDARD
ABSORBER OPTION NO
INITIALIZATION OPTION STANDARD
HYDRAULIC PARAMETER CALCULATIONS NO
INSIDE LOOP CONVERGENCE METHOD BROYDEN
DESIGN SPECIFICATION METHOD NESTED
MAXIMUM NO. OF OUTSIDE LOOP ITERATIONS 25
MAXIMUM NO. OF INSIDE LOOP ITERATIONS 10
MAXIMUM NUMBER OF FLASH ITERATIONS 30
FLASH TOLERANCE 0.000100000
OUTSIDE LOOP CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE 0.000100000
*******************
**** RESULTS ****
*******************
OUTLET STREAMS
--------------
10 11
COMPONENT:
METHANOL .12145 .87855
WATER .40464E-04 .99996
DME .83699 .16301
**NOTE** REPORTED VALUES FOR STAGE LIQUID AND VAPOR RATES ARE THE FLOWS
FROM THE STAGE INCLUDING ANY SIDE PRODUCT.
ENTHALPY
STAGE TEMPERATURE PRESSURE KCAL/MOL HEAT DUTY
C BAR LIQUID VAPOR GCAL/HR
14 259.3 60.49
15 259.4 60.53
16 259.4 60.57
17 259.4 60.59
23 251.2 56.83
24 198.8 52.39 198.8000
********************************
***** HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS *****
********************************
TEMPERATURE
C
STAGE LIQUID FROM VAPOR TO
1 47.397 54.095
2 54.095 63.772
3 63.772 74.490
11 84.196 87.175
12 87.175 92.524
32
13 92.351 92.382
14 92.382 92.419
15 92.419 92.470
16 92.470 92.550
17 92.550 92.693
23 102.52 123.23
24 123.23 123.23
************************************
***** TRAY RATING CALCULATIONS *****
************************************
*******************
*** SECTION 1 ***
*******************
TRAY SPECIFICATIONS
-------------------
! ! !
! A ! !
! !-----------------! AA
! ! !
! ! A !
!-----------------! ! AA
! ! !
! ! !
SINGLE CROSSFLOW TRAY
NUMBER OF PASSES 1
DIAMETER METER 0.79000
TRAY SPACING METER 0.60960
DECK THICKNESS METER 0.0034036
TRAY TYPE SIEVE
HOLE AREA/ACTIVE AREA 0.12000
HOLE DIAMETER METER 0.012700
34
DOWNCOMER DIMENSIONS
--------------------
WEIR HEIGHT METER 0.050800
DC CLEARANCE METER 0.038100
TOP DC WIDTH METER 0.12364
FLOODING DC BACKUP/
STAGE FACTOR DC VELOCITY DC BACKUP TRAY SPACE PRES. DROP
M/SEC METER BAR
2 0.3938 0.1359E-01 0.1133 0.1859 0.3446E-02
3 0.3614 0.8156E-02 0.1075 0.1763 0.3394E-02
4 0.3437 0.5711E-02 0.1045 0.1714 0.3407E-02
5 0.3426 0.5458E-02 0.1042 0.1710 0.3398E-02
6 0.3425 0.5421E-02 0.1042 0.1709 0.3395E-02
7 0.3424 0.5395E-02 0.1042 0.1709 0.3393E-02
8 0.3424 0.5355E-02 0.1042 0.1709 0.3391E-02
9 0.3425 0.5284E-02 0.1042 0.1709 0.3388E-02
10 0.3426 0.5146E-02 0.1042 0.1709 0.3382E-02
11 0.3424 0.4853E-02 0.1041 0.1707 0.3374E-02
12 0.3405 0.4235E-02 0.1036 0.1700 0.3371E-02
13 0.1776 0.6090E-01 0.1331 0.2183 0.4010E-02
14 0.1777 0.6092E-01 0.1331 0.2184 0.4010E-02
15 0.1777 0.6094E-01 0.1331 0.2184 0.4009E-02
16 0.1777 0.6094E-01 0.1331 0.2184 0.4009E-02
17 0.1777 0.6093E-01 0.1331 0.2184 0.4009E-02
18 0.1774 0.6088E-01 0.1331 0.2183 0.4009E-02
19 0.1766 0.6074E-01 0.1330 0.2183 0.4010E-02
20 0.1750 0.6041E-01 0.1329 0.2180 0.4011E-02
35
**********************
**** INPUT DATA ****
**********************
NUMBER OF STAGES 28
ALGORITHM OPTION STANDARD
ABSORBER OPTION NO
INITIALIZATION OPTION STANDARD
HYDRAULIC PARAMETER CALCULATIONS NO
INSIDE LOOP CONVERGENCE METHOD BROYDEN
DESIGN SPECIFICATION METHOD NESTED
MAXIMUM NO. OF OUTSIDE LOOP ITERATIONS 25
MAXIMUM NO. OF INSIDE LOOP ITERATIONS 10
MAXIMUM NUMBER OF FLASH ITERATIONS 30
FLASH TOLERANCE 0.000100000
OUTSIDE LOOP CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE 0.000100000
*******************
**** RESULTS ****
*******************
OUTLET STREAMS
--------------
13 14
COMPONENT:
METHANOL .85541 .14459
WATER .42642E-02 .99574
DME 1.0000 .86032E-09
**NOTE** REPORTED VALUES FOR STAGE LIQUID AND VAPOR RATES ARE THE FLOWS
FROM THE STAGE INCLUDING ANY SIDE PRODUCT.
ENTHALPY
STAGE TEMPERATURE PRESSURE KCAL/MOL HEAT DUTY
C BAR LIQUID VAPOR GCAL/HR
37
********************************
***** HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS *****
********************************
TEMPERATURE
C
STAGE LIQUID FROM VAPOR TO
1 51.496 105.10
2 105.10 119.53
3 119.53 120.50
13 126.56 128.49
14 128.49 130.63
15 132.19 136.55
16 136.55 137.71
17 137.71 138.05
18 138.05 138.19
19 138.19 138.31
27 147.53 157.96
28 157.96 157.96
************************************
***** TRAY RATING CALCULATIONS *****
************************************
*******************
*** SECTION 1 ***
*******************
TRAY SPECIFICATIONS
-------------------
! ! !
! A ! !
! !-----------------! AA
! ! !
! ! A !
!-----------------! ! AA
! ! !
! ! !
SINGLE CROSSFLOW TRAY
NUMBER OF PASSES 1
DIAMETER METER 0.87000
TRAY SPACING METER 0.45720
DECK THICKNESS METER 0.0034036
TRAY TYPE SIEVE
HOLE AREA/ACTIVE AREA 0.12000
HOLE DIAMETER METER 0.012700
DOWNCOMER DIMENSIONS
--------------------
WEIR HEIGHT METER 0.050800
DC CLEARANCE METER 0.038100
TOP DC WIDTH METER 0.13616
FLOODING DC BACKUP/
STAGE FACTOR DC VELOCITY DC BACKUP TRAY SPACE PRES. DROP
M/SEC METER BAR
2 0.4090 0.2348E-01 0.1187 0.2595 0.3748E-02
3 0.4248 0.2491E-01 0.1205 0.2635 0.3734E-02
4 0.4240 0.2480E-01 0.1204 0.2633 0.3729E-02
5 0.4219 0.2455E-01 0.1201 0.2627 0.3723E-02
6 0.4193 0.2423E-01 0.1198 0.2621 0.3716E-02
7 0.4162 0.2385E-01 0.1194 0.2613 0.3709E-02
8 0.4124 0.2338E-01 0.1190 0.2603 0.3700E-02
9 0.4077 0.2279E-01 0.1184 0.2590 0.3691E-02
10 0.4020 0.2208E-01 0.1178 0.2575 0.3681E-02
11 0.3950 0.2119E-01 0.1169 0.2557 0.3671E-02
12 0.3864 0.2010E-01 0.1159 0.2535 0.3661E-02
13 0.3758 0.1878E-01 0.1146 0.2507 0.3655E-02
14 0.3633 0.1721E-01 0.1131 0.2474 0.3658E-02
15 0.3430 0.4342E-01 0.1269 0.2775 0.4067E-02
16 0.3408 0.4306E-01 0.1266 0.2769 0.4049E-02
17 0.3402 0.4298E-01 0.1265 0.2768 0.4045E-02
18 0.3398 0.4295E-01 0.1265 0.2767 0.4043E-02
19 0.3394 0.4291E-01 0.1265 0.2766 0.4042E-02
20 0.3387 0.4284E-01 0.1264 0.2765 0.4041E-02
21 0.3375 0.4269E-01 0.1263 0.2762 0.4040E-02
22 0.3354 0.4242E-01 0.1261 0.2757 0.4038E-02
23 0.3317 0.4190E-01 0.1257 0.2749 0.4035E-02
24 0.3251 0.4097E-01 0.1249 0.2733 0.4032E-02
25 0.3137 0.3934E-01 0.1237 0.2705 0.4030E-02
26 0.2956 0.3672E-01 0.1217 0.2663 0.4037E-02
27 0.2720 0.3316E-01 0.1192 0.2606 0.4068E-02
44
;Input Summary created by Aspen Plus Rel. 24.0 at 16:45:23 Sat Nov 3, 2012
;Directory C:\Users\1886261\Desktop\SDSMT\Courses\Fall 2012\Design\Project
2\etoh sep Filename C:\Users\1886261\AppData\Local\Temp\~ap611a.txt
;
DYNAMICS
DYNAMICS RESULTS=ON
SIM-OPTIONS OLD-DATABANK=YES
DESCRIPTION "
General Simulation with Metric Units :
C, bar, kg/hr, kmol/hr, Gcal/hr, cum/hr.
COMPONENTS
METHANOL CH4O /
WATER H2O /
ETHANOL C2H6O-2
FLOWSHEET
BLOCK T-1104 IN=17 OUT=18 19
PROPERTIES NRTL-RK
PROP-DATA NRTL-1
IN-UNITS MET VOLUME-FLOW='cum/hr' ENTHALPY-FLO='Gcal/hr' &
45
STREAM 17
SUBSTREAM MIXED TEMP=25. PRES=15. MOLE-FLOW=100.
MOLE-FRAC METHANOL 0.941 / WATER 0.009 / ETHANOL 0.05
EO-CONV-OPTI
**********************
**** INPUT DATA ****
**********************
NUMBER OF STAGES 61
ALGORITHM OPTION STANDARD
ABSORBER OPTION NO
INITIALIZATION OPTION STANDARD
HYDRAULIC PARAMETER CALCULATIONS NO
INSIDE LOOP CONVERGENCE METHOD BROYDEN
DESIGN SPECIFICATION METHOD NESTED
MAXIMUM NO. OF OUTSIDE LOOP ITERATIONS 25
MAXIMUM NO. OF INSIDE LOOP ITERATIONS 10
MAXIMUM NUMBER OF FLASH ITERATIONS 30
FLASH TOLERANCE 0.000100000
OUTSIDE LOOP CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE 0.000100000
*******************
**** RESULTS ****
*******************
OUTLET STREAMS
--------------
18 19
COMPONENT:
METHANOL .99999 .81453E-05
WATER .13465E-04 .99999
ETHANOL .50002E-02 .99500
BOUNDS
CALCULATED
LOWER UPPER VALUE
MOLAR REFLUX RATIO 0.0000 50.000 8.5800
DISTILLATE TO FEED RATIO 0.10000E-07 1.0000 0.94124
COMPS: METHANOL
3 MASS-RECOV STREAMS: 19 0.99500 0.99500
COMPS: ETHANOL
**NOTE** REPORTED VALUES FOR STAGE LIQUID AND VAPOR RATES ARE THE FLOWS
FROM THE STAGE INCLUDING ANY SIDE PRODUCT.
ENTHALPY
STAGE TEMPERATURE PRESSURE KCAL/MOL HEAT DUTY
C BAR LIQUID VAPOR GCAL/HR
22 0.2637E+05 0.2932E+05
23 0.3016E+05 0.2939E+05 3261.7262
24 0.3028E+05 0.2992E+05
25 0.3042E+05 0.3003E+05
60 0.3516E+05 0.3499E+05
61 245.4 0.3491E+05 245.4315
********************************
***** HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS *****
********************************
TEMPERATURE
51
C
STAGE LIQUID FROM VAPOR TO
1 64.203 64.381
2 64.381 64.558
22 68.157 68.435
23 68.435 68.721
24 68.721 69.050
25 69.050 69.433
60 86.829 86.969
61 86.969 86.969
************************************
***** TRAY RATING CALCULATIONS *****
************************************
*******************
*** SECTION 1 ***
*******************
TRAY SPECIFICATIONS
-------------------
! ! !
! A ! !
! !-----------------! AA
! ! !
! ! A !
!-----------------! ! AA
! ! !
! ! !
SINGLE CROSSFLOW TRAY
NUMBER OF PASSES 1
DIAMETER METER 2.20000
TRAY SPACING METER 0.60960
DECK THICKNESS METER 0.0034036
TRAY TYPE SIEVE
HOLE AREA/ACTIVE AREA 0.12000
HOLE DIAMETER METER 0.012700
DOWNCOMER DIMENSIONS
--------------------
WEIR HEIGHT METER 0.050800
DC CLEARANCE METER 0.038100
TOP DC WIDTH METER 0.34430
FLOODING DC BACKUP/
STAGE FACTOR DC VELOCITY DC BACKUP TRAY SPACE PRES. DROP
M/SEC METER BAR
2 0.7401 0.2541E-01 0.1729 0.2836 0.6939E-02
3 0.7374 0.2543E-01 0.1726 0.2831 0.6917E-02
4 0.7347 0.2545E-01 0.1723 0.2827 0.6894E-02
5 0.7321 0.2546E-01 0.1721 0.2823 0.6873E-02
6 0.7296 0.2548E-01 0.1718 0.2819 0.6851E-02
7 0.7270 0.2550E-01 0.1716 0.2815 0.6830E-02
8 0.7245 0.2552E-01 0.1714 0.2811 0.6810E-02
9 0.7220 0.2554E-01 0.1711 0.2807 0.6790E-02
10 0.7195 0.2556E-01 0.1709 0.2803 0.6770E-02
11 0.7171 0.2558E-01 0.1707 0.2800 0.6750E-02
12 0.7147 0.2560E-01 0.1705 0.2796 0.6731E-02
13 0.7124 0.2562E-01 0.1703 0.2793 0.6713E-02
14 0.7100 0.2565E-01 0.1701 0.2790 0.6695E-02
15 0.7078 0.2568E-01 0.1699 0.2787 0.6677E-02
16 0.7055 0.2571E-01 0.1697 0.2784 0.6660E-02
17 0.7033 0.2575E-01 0.1695 0.2781 0.6644E-02
18 0.7012 0.2579E-01 0.1694 0.2779 0.6629E-02
19 0.6991 0.2583E-01 0.1692 0.2776 0.6615E-02
20 0.6970 0.2589E-01 0.1691 0.2775 0.6601E-02
21 0.6950 0.2595E-01 0.1690 0.2773 0.6589E-02
22 0.6931 0.2602E-01 0.1690 0.2772 0.6579E-02
23 0.7080 0.2977E-01 0.1751 0.2872 0.6760E-02
24 0.7063 0.2988E-01 0.1751 0.2873 0.6754E-02
25 0.7047 0.3003E-01 0.1752 0.2875 0.6751E-02
26 0.7032 0.3020E-01 0.1754 0.2878 0.6752E-02
27 0.7019 0.3042E-01 0.1757 0.2882 0.6757E-02
28 0.7007 0.3068E-01 0.1761 0.2888 0.6766E-02
29 0.6996 0.3099E-01 0.1765 0.2896 0.6780E-02
54
Differential equations
1 d(Fmeoh)/d(V) = Rmeoh
2 d(Fetoh)/d(V) = Retoh
3 d(Fwater)/d(V) = Rwater
4 d(Fdme)/d(V) = Rdme
5 d(Fdee)/d(V) = Rdee
6 d(Fethyl)/d(V) = Rethyl
7 d(T)/d(V) = HEAT
Explicit
equations
1 FT = Fmeoh+Fetoh+Fwater+Fdme+Fdee+Fethyl
2 Ea = 80480 J/mol
3 Po = 1470 Kpa
4 R = 8.314 J/mol*k
6 P1 = Po*FT/FTo
7 Pmeoh = P1*(Fmeoh/FT)
8 Ko = (1.21*10^6)*1000/(60*60) (mol/m3*cat*s)
9 Petoh = P1*(Fetoh/FT)
10 K1 = Ko/5
11 R1etoh = -K1*exp(-Ea/(R*T))*Petoh
R1meoh = -Ko*exp(-
12
Ea/(R*T))*Pmeoh
13 Rmeoh = R1meoh
14 R2etoh = .5*R1etoh
15 Retoh = R1etoh+R2etoh
16 R1dme = -.5*Rmeoh
17 R1dee = -.5*R1etoh
18 Rdme = R1dme
19 Rdee = R1dee
57
20 Pwater = P1*(Fwater/FT)
21 Pdme = P1*(Fdme/FT)
22 Pdee = P1*(Fdee/FT)
23 Pethyl = P1*(Fethyl/FT)
24 Pt = Pmeoh+Petoh+Pwater+Pdme+Pdee+Pethyl
25 R1water = -.5*R1meoh+-.5*R1etoh+(-R2etoh)
26 Rwater = R1water
27 R1ethyl = .5*R1dee
28 Rethyl = R1ethyl
29 Sd = if(V>.0001)then(Fdee/Fethyl)else(0)
30 Sdd = if(V>.0001)then(Fdme/Fdee)else(0)
31 Hrx2 = -15000 J/mol*K
33 Cpmeoh = 67 J/mol*K
34 Cpwater = 36 J/mol*K
37 Cpethyl = 70 J/mol*K
HEAT = (-Rmeoh*(-Hrx1)+(-R1etoh)*(-Hrx2)+(-R2etoh)*(-
39 Hrx2))/(Fetoh*Cpetoh+Fmeoh*Cpmeoh+Fwater*Cpwater+Fdee*Cpdee+Fdme*Cpdme+Fethyl*Cp
ethyl)
40 Hrx3 = 45700 J/mol*K
58
Confidentiality Statement
This report and the associated engineering calculations represent our own original work. No outside
sources (i.e., other chemical engineering students, professors, or engineering professionals) assisted in
the preparation of this study, and information that was obtained from the literature specific to the DME
Signature______________________________________________________ Date_______________