Sie sind auf Seite 1von 8

World Journal of Mechanics, 2011, 1, 209-216

doi:10.4236/wjm.2011.15027 Published Online October 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/wjm)

Solution and Type Curve Analysis of Fluid Flow Model


for Fractal Reservoir
Yulong Zhao, Liehui Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, China
E-mail: 373104686@qq.com
Received July 16, 2011; revised August 14, 2011; accepted August 30, 2011

Abstract

Conventional pressure-transient models have been developed under the assumption of homogeneous reser-
voir. However, core, log and outcrop data indicate this assumption is not realistic in most cases. But in many
cases, the homogeneous models are still applied to obtain an effective permeability corresponding to ficti-
tious homogeneous reservoirs. This approach seems reasonable if the permeability variation is sufficiently
small. In this paper, fractal dimension and fractal index are introduced into the seepage flow mechanism to
establish the fluid flow models in fractal reservoir under three outer-boundary conditions. Exact dimen-
sionless solutions are obtained by using the Laplace transformation assuming the well is producing at a con-
stant rate. Combining the Stehfests inversion with the Vongvuthipornchais method, the new type curves are
obtained. The sensitivities of the curve shape to fractal dimension () and fractal index (d) are analyzed; the
curves dont change too much when is a constant and d change. For a closed reservoir, the up-curving has
little to do with when d is a constant; but when is a constant, the slope of the up-curving section almost
remains the same, only the pressure at the starting point decreases with the increase of d; and when d = 2 and
= 0, the solutions and curves become those of the conventional reservoirs, the application of this solution
has also been introduced at the end of this paper.

Keywords: Fractal Reservoir, Fractal Dimension, Fractal Index, Type Curve, Well Test

1. Introduction injection well tests, they both assumed the reservoir


properties to vary according to a power law relationship
The concept of fractal geometry, developed by Mandel- with distance from the source. Chang and Yortsos [5]
bort [1], suggests that structures which appear to be com- presented a well testing model which assumed that the
pletely random can be described within a geometric fracture network could be described by a fractal distribu-
mathematical framework and offers many possibilities in tion. He is also obtained the analytical results, which
scientific applications. The class of structures treated in showed that a fractal reservoir can be identified by a
this study is limited to those that exhibit self-similar log-log straight line with the slop equals to a function of
geometrical properties which mean that the structure the fractal dimension and the fractal index. Beier [6] and
looks the same when observed under various scales of Aprilian [7] applied fractal reservoir model to analyze
measurement. He is also one of the first studiers to find well test data for complex reservoirs which could not be
that many structures in nature exhibit these self-similar matched by traditional model, and the results were con-
geometrical properties. Many geological properties af- sistent with field practice. Poon [8] extended the concept
fecting the flow of fluids in porous media are known to of fractal distribution to study the effect of a composite
describe the fractal characteristics. reservoir. He et al. [9] established a fractal model for
Hewett [2] reported that porosity and permeability dis- unsteady-state flow in dual-porosity and permeability
tributions in rock formation demonstrated fractal charac- reservoirs based on Warren-Root [10] Model, and solved
teristics and introduced the use of fractal interpolation it by Correction Prediction method. Meanwhile, they
technique to describe the heterogeneities in a reservoir. analyzed pressure performances and their effect on dif-
Bakker [3] and Doe [4] also developed similar models ferent factors. Li [11] modified a well test model for in-
for the interpretation of constant pressure production/ finite dual-porosity reservoir with wellbore storage and

Copyright 2011 SciRes. WJM


210 Y. L. ZHAO ET AL.

skin based on fractal theory, and also resulted a series of 1


applicable analytic solutions. Kong et al. [12] set up r v r (3)
r r t
equations of flow rate, permeability and porosity for
fluid flow in fractal dimensional porous media, and dif- Darcy flow equation:
ferential equations in different coordinate systems. They k r p
solved the model with consideration of wellbore storage vr (4)
r
and skin, and plotted the solution as type curves. On the
basis of Warren-Root mode, Zhang et al. [13], set up a Substitution of Equations (1), (2) and (4) into (3):
model for deformed dual-porosity fractal gas reservoirs
2 p d 1 p r w ct p
by introducing fractal parameters and compressibility (5)
factors. They solved this model by finite element method r 2 r r rw k w t
with consideration of secondary boundary conditions, 1 1
plotting the results into type curves. To consider thresh- where: cl c ct cl c .
p p
old pressure gradient in low-perm reservoir and gradual
pressure propagation in the formation, Hou and Tong [14]
established non-Darcy flow model for deformed dual- 3. Model Solutions
porosity media. For composite reservoir, there are also
many scholars [16-21] have studied it and they also ob- Introducing the following dimensionless variables:
tained the characteristic curves. 2kw h pi p
Type curves from models established by above schol- pD (6)
q
ars are mainly plotted the pD with tD on bilogarithmic
graph, which are greatly different from the traditional r
rD (7)
ones, and not so applicable in field practice. Therefore, rw
this paper established the flow model for fractal reservoir
based on the mechanics of fluid flow in porous media kw t
tD (8)
and fractal theory. Analytical solutions are obtained by o ct rw 2
Laplace transformation and generalized Bessel equation
Allows the continuity equation to be written in dimen-
for three kinds of outer-boundary conditions. According
sionless terms and consider the boundary and initial con-
to the similar method of Vongvuthipornchai [22] used to
ditions, then
plot type curves for non-Newton fluid flow, the corre-
sponding type curves is plotted by Stehfest [23] numeri- 2 pD d 1 pD p
rD D (9)
cal inversion. rD 2 rD rD tD

2. Mathematical and Definitions The initial pressure distribution is assumed uniform,


everywhere
The model was developed with fractured rock in mind, pD rD , 0 0 (10)
ignored the porosity and permeability of the matrix. The
Inner boundary conditions
main assumptions of the model include: 1) d-dimensional
fractal flowing grids in two-dimensional Euclidean non- p
pwD pD rD D S (11)
permeable rock, full penetration of the wellbore into res- rD 1
rD rD 1
ervoir with thickness of h and under radial flow; 2) res-
ervoir fluid is slight-compressive; 3) ignore the effect of dpwD pD
gravity and threshold pressure gradient. CD rD 1 (12)
dtD rD r 1
According to fractal theory [12], permeability and po- D

rosity of the system is: And the outer boundary conditions are as follows:

r
d 2
lim pD rD , tD 0 (Infinite reservoir) (13)
k r kw (1) rD

rw
pD
0 (Closed circle reservoir) (14)
r
d 2 rD rD reD
r w (2)
rw pD reD , z 0
Continuity equation for fluid: (Circle reservoir with constant-pressure boundary)(15)

Copyright 2011 SciRes. WJM


Y. L. ZHAO ET AL. 211

To simplify, Equations (9) to (15) are transformed into 1 n

Laplace space. p D rD 2 AI v
zrD BK v zrD (25)

2 pD d 1 pD Using the method of modified Bessel function [12],
rD z p D (16)
rD 2 rD rD the derivative of Equation (25) is:

where: p D pD e ztD dtD pD m 1 2 n
rD 2
AI v 1
z
zr D



(26)
0

Inner boundary conditions:


rD BK
v 1 zr D


pD Combine Equations (25) and (26) with (17) and (18):


p wD p D
rD 1
rD
r
D
S
rD 1
(17)

p wD A I v z zSI v 1 z

(27)
pD 1
B K v z zSK v 1 z

CD z p wD rD
r
(18)
z
D r 1
D CD z p wD A zI v 1
z B zK v 1 z 1
z
(28)
Outer boundary conditions:
Infinite reservoir
3.1. For Infinite Reservoir
lim p D rD , z 0 (19)
rD
According to the characteristics of Modified Bessel Func-
Closed circle reservoir tion [12], as the dimensionless radius approaches infinity
Iv becomes infinity; therefore to satisfy the outer boundary
pD
0 (20) condition the constant A must be zero. To determine the
rD rD reD constant B, apply the inner boundary condition (Equations
(22)-(23)) to Equations (27)-(28). The resulting solution of
Circle reservoir with constant-pressure boundary normalized bottom-hole pressure is the follows:
p D reD , z 0 (21) p wD
Equation (13) can be solved according to the theory of
generalized Bessel equation. Let, n d 1 to con-
Kv
z S zK v 1 z
3
vert Equation (13) into the format of generalized Bessel
equation
CD z 2 K v

z S zK v 1
z z K v 1

2
z
(29)
2 R n R
r m n zR (22)
r 2 r r 3.2. For Closed Circle Reservoir or
where: m = d 1. Constant-Pressure Boundary Reservoir
Combining m with n, we have m n = and is a
constant. Because of 2 + m n = 2 + > 0, and using the Applying the similar method of infinite reservoir, we can
method of Bessel function [12], a solution of Equation obtain the following solution:
(16) is assumed in the form:
p wD A I v

z zSI v 1 z

2 z 2 m n
(30)
1 n
AI v
2mn
rD 2

B Kv

z zSK v 1 z

p D rD 2
(23)
2 m n
BK 2 z r 2 1 1
v where: A , B 2 , 1 A22
D
Z
2mn
1
1 n 2 A21 , A11 A22 A21 A12
where: v . Z
2mn
z z
Define by: A11 CD z I v 1 CD z I v 1

32
S
2mn
(24) z
2 zI v 1
Equation (23) reduce to:

Copyright 2011 SciRes. WJM


212 Y. L. ZHAO ET AL.

z z 4. Type Curves and Flow Period Analysis


A12 CD z K v CD z K v 1
32
S

z Using the method of Vongvuthipornchai [19], analytical
zK v 1 solutions abstained above can be plotted as type curves
in bilogarithmic coordinate system with [tD/CD](4-d+)/2 as
For closed circle reservoir x axis and [pD/CD](2-d+)/2, pD*[tD/CD](4-d+)/2 as y axis.
z z The type curves of infinite fractal reservoir are shown
A21 I v 1 reD , A22 K v 1 reD in Figures 1 and 2, Figures 3 and 4 are for closed circle
reservoir and circle reservoir with constant-pressure
For circle reservoir with constant-pressure boundary: boundary, respectively. According to the type curves, the
following flow periods are obtained:
z z
A21 I v reD , A22 K v reD Stage I is the wellbore storage flow period, which is
characterized by a unit slop line and not affected by frac-

Figure 1. Type curves of infinite reservoir with different fractal dimension d (CD = 1000, S = 2, = 0.01).

Figure 2. Type curves of infinite reservoir with different fractal factor (CD = 1000, S = 2, d = 1.7).

Copyright 2011 SciRes. WJM


Y. L. ZHAO ET AL. 213

Figure 3. Type curves of closed and constant-pressure boundary reservoir with different fractal dimension d (CD = 100, S = 2,
= 0.01, reD = 2000).

Figure 4. Type curves of closed and constant-pressure boundary reservoir with different fractal factor (CD = 100, S = 2, d =
1.8, reD = 2000).

tal dimension d and factor . flow period is no longer a 0.5 straight line as traditional
Stage II is the transition flow period after wellbore type curves. They become a group of upwards straight
storage. Based on the type curves, length and peak value lines, whose slopes and starting points are related to d
of this period are controlled by wellbore storage effect, and . For constant d and , the slope is also a constant
skin, d and . For a constant value, length and peak with different starting points and pressure (pressure de-
value decrease with the increase of d; when d is constant, rivative) values.
they decrease with . According to Figures 3 and 4, the Stage represents the boundary effect. When the
transition period becomes shorter and shorter when d reservoir is infinite, this period will not exit. For closed
decreases or increases. or constant-pressure boundary reservoir, rapid up- or
Stage III stands for radial flow period. For fractal res- down-curving can be seen on the type curves (see Fig-
ervoir, it can be noticed from the curves that the radial ures 3 and 4). Closer the boundary is, earlier this change

Copyright 2011 SciRes. WJM


214 Y. L. ZHAO ET AL.

happens, vice versa. According to Figures 3 and 4, for and the Kh = 359 (mDm), and so, the effective perme-
constant-pressure boundary reservoir, when d is fixed, ability is 10.89 (mD), which the results obtained are con-
the down-curving happens earlier with becoming sistent with reference [11].
smaller; and when is a constant, the curves do not
change too much when d changes. For closed reservoir, 6. Conclusions
when d is a constant, the up-curving has little to do with
; and when is fixed, the slope of the up-curving sec- Based on mechanism of fluid flow in porous media and
tion is almost a constant, only the pressure at starting the fractal theory, a model with fractal characteristics for
point decreases with increase of d. fractal reservoir is constructed and solved by Stehfests
When d = 2 and = 0, the results become the conven- [20] inversion method. A new method to plot type curves
tional reservoirs solutions, and the type curves become of fractal networks with fractal characteristics was de-
the corresponding ones, which are shown in Figure 5. It veloped. These new type curves have the similar charac-
can conclude that the conventional reservoirs are the teristics as those of the conventional ones. Compared to
special form of fractal reservoirs. the previous fractal reservoir curves, the improvement is
valuable.
5. Application Type curves for fractal reservoir are greatly affected
by dimension d and factor , especially during the radial
A pressure buildup test in an oil well is influenced by flow period, where the pressure derivative is not a 0.5
skin and wellbore storage. The measured pressure date as straight line any more, and the slop of the line increases
a function of time is listed in page 294 of the Bourdet with the decrease of d and increase of . During the
(radial flow example) [11]. And the other known reser- wellbore storage and boundary flow period the curves
voir and well data as follows: have the similar characteristics as conventional reservoir,
= 0.25, rw = 0.088392 (m), Ct = 0.000609 (MPa1), h and when d = 2 and = 0, the solutions and curves be-
= 32.956 (m), Bo = 1.06 (m3/sm3), 0 = 2.5 (cp). come those of the conventional reservoir, the example is
A log-log plot (full test history t with pressure and also supplied during the application when d = 2 and = 0,
pressure derivative functions) and final match of this which is a special condition of the fractal reservoir.
example is shown in Figure 6.
Dates are matched against the conventional reservoir 7. Acknowledgements
type curves for a well with wellbore storage and skin in a
reservoir with homogeneous behavior. The property of This work was supported by National Program on Key
match type curve is CD = 800, and the S = 7.6. So, from Basic Research Project (973 Program, Grant No.
the definition of CD, we have C = 0.2E 3 (m3/MPa), 2011CB201005), Research Fund for the Doctoral Pro-

Figure 5. Type curves of infinite reservoir with the (d = 2, = 0, S = 2).

Copyright 2011 SciRes. WJM


Y. L. ZHAO ET AL. 215

Figure 6. The log-log matching plot.

gram of Higher Education of China (Grant No. 201051 gary, 7-9 June 1995, Document ID: 95-34.
21110006). [9] G. L. He and K. L. Xiang, Mathematical Model and
Character of Pressure Transient of Unstable Seepage
8. References Flow in Deformation Dual-Porosity Fractal Reservoirs,
Journal of Southwest Petroleum University, Vol. 24, No.
4, 2002, pp. 24-28. (in Chinese)
[1] B. B. Mandebort, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W.
H. Freeman, New York, 1982. [10] J. E. Warrant and P. J. Root, The Behavior of Naturally
[2] T. A. Hewett, Fractal Distribution of Reservoir Hetero- Fractured Reservoirs, SPE Journal, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1963,
geneity and Their Influence on Fluid Transport, Society pp. 245-255.
of Petroleum Engineers, New Orlean, 5-8 October 1986, [11] D. P. Bourdet, J. A. Ayoub and Y. M. Pirard, Use of
Document ID: 15386. Pressure Derivative in Well Test Interpretation, SPE
[3] J. A. Bakker, A Generalized Radial Flow Model for Formation Evaluation, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1989, pp. 293-302.
Hydraulic Tests in Fractured Rock, Water Resources [12] S. C. Li, A Solution of Fractal Dual Porosity Reservoir
Research, Vol. 20, No. 10, 1986, pp. 1796-1840. Model in Well Testing Analysis, Progress in Explora-
[4] T. W. Doe, Fractional Dimension Analysis of Constant tion Geophysics, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2002, pp. 60-62. (in Chi-
Pressure Well Tests, The 66th Annual Technical Con- nese)
ference and Exhibition of SPE, Dallas, 6-9 October [13] X. Y. Kong, Advanced Mechanics of Fluids in Porous
1991. Document ID: 22702-MS. doi:10.2118/22702-MS Media, University of Science and Technology of China
[5] J. Chang and Y. C. Yortsos, Pressure Transient Analysis Press, Hefei, 1999. (in Chinese)
of Fractal Reservoir, SPE Formation Evaluation, Vol. 5, [14] L. H. Zhang, J. L. Zhang and B. Q. Xu, A Nonlinear
No. 1, 1990, pp. 31-38. doi:10.2118/18170-PA Seepage Flow Model for Deformable Double Media
[6] R. A. Beier, Pressure Transient Field Data Showing Fractal Gas Reservoirs, Chinese Journal of Conputa-
Fractal Reservoir Structure, International Technical tional Physics, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2007, pp. 90-94. (in Chi-
Meeting of the SPE Calgary, Calgary, 10-13 June 1990, nese)
Document ID: 21553-MS. [15] Y. M. Hou and D. K. Tong, Non-Steady Flow of
[7] S. Aprilian, D. Abdassah, L. Mucharant, et al., Applica- Non-Newtonian Power-Low Permeability with Mov-
tion of Fractal Reservoir Mode for Interference Test ing-Boundary in Double Porous Media and Fractal Res-
Analysis in Kamojiang Geothermal Field (Indonesia), ervoir, Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 26, No. 8, 2009, pp.
The 68th SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibi- 245-250. (in Chinese)
tion, Houston, 3-6 October 1993, Document ID: [16] K. L. Xiang and X. Q. Tu, The Analytical Solutions of
26465-MS. doi:10.2118/26465-MS Mathematical Model for a Fractal Composite Reservoir
[8] D. Poon, Transient Pressure Analysis of Fractal Reser- with Non-Newtonian Power Low Fluids Flow, Chinese
voirs. The Petroleum Society of CIM, The 46th Annual Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2004,
Technical Meeting of the Petroleum Society of CIM, Cal- pp. 558-564. (in Chinese)

Copyright 2011 SciRes. WJM


216 Y. L. ZHAO ET AL.

[17] X. R. Deng and S. C. Li, Solution to the Well Testing in Naturally Fracture Reservoir System-Using Fractal
Model for Fractal Composite Reservoirs, Journal of Xi- Concept, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1999, Docu-
hua University Natural Science, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2005, pp. ment ID: 57276.
4-7. (in Chinese) [21] X. Y. Kong, D. L. Li and D. T. Lu, Basic Formulas of
[18] C. X. Xu, S. C. Li and W. B. Zhu, Similar Structure of Fractal Seepage and Type-Curves of Fractal Reservoirs,
Well Test Analytical Solution in the Fractal Composite Journal of Xian Petroleum University, Vol. 22, No. 2,
Reservoir, Drilling Production Technology, Vol. 29, No. 2007, pp. 1-5. (in Chinese)
5, 2006, pp. 39-43. (in Chinese) [22] S. Vongvuthipornchai and R. Raghavan, Well Test
[19] C. S. Chakrabarty, M. Farouqali and W. S. Tortlke, Analysis of Date Dominated by Storage and Skin: Non-
Transient Flow Behavior of Non-Newtonian Power-Law newtonian Power-Law Fluid, Society of Petroleum En-
Fluids in Fractal Reservoirs, Annual Technical Meeting gineers, 1987, Document ID: 14454.
of the Petroleum Society of CIM, Calgary, 1993, Docu- [23] H. Stehfest, Numerical Inversion of Laplace Trans-
ment ID: CIM93-06. forms, Communications ACM, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1970, pp.
[20] R. R. Dyah, J. C. Kana, A. Doddy, et al., A New Nu- 47-48.
merically Model of Single Well Radial Multiphase Flow

Nomenclatures Greek symbols


= viscosity, cp
h = reservoir thickness, cm = density, g/cm3
d = fractal dimension = porosity, fraction
= fractal factor Subscripts
k = permeability, D D = dimensionless
r = radius, cm w = wellbore hole
v = velocity, cm/s i = initial
p = reservoir pressure, atm f = fluid
t = production time, s t = total
q = production rate, cm3/s wD = wellbore dimensionless
z = Laplace variable eD = external dimensionless
Iv, Kv = modified Bessel function

Copyright 2011 SciRes. WJM

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen