Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Himanshu Arora
Loan Syndication Background & History
A syndicated loan is one that is provided by a group of lenders and is structured, arranged, and
administered by one or several commercial or investment banks known as Arrangers.
Arrangers serve the investment-banking role of raising investor dollars for an issuer in need of
capital.
The issuer pays the Arranger a fee for this service, and this fee increases with the complexity
and risk factors of the loan.
In the Mid-1980s when the larger buyouts needed bank financing, the syndicated loan market
became the dominant way for issuers to tap banks and other institutional capital providers for loans.
In the late 90s to early 2000s hundreds of Collateral Loan Obligation funds (CLOs) were
created and joined the loan syndication process. These funds were referred to as non-bank
institutions or institutional investors. These institutional investors played a key role in the exponential
growth of the Mega LBO deals seen in 2005-2007.
By 2007, nearly 75% of the loans were provided by non-banks, versus less than 20% 10 years
earlier.
The Fall of 2007 the end of liquidity in the U.S Syndication market Traditional Banks had to
step up in the months and years to follow the liquidity crisis The U.S Syndication market
completely changed.
3
Two Markets Served
4
Two Markets Served
$692 Billion
$715 Billion
$245 Billion
$229 Billion
5
Loan Syndication Market Overview (Continued)
Exponential Demand Surge of Syndicated Leveraged Loans Vs Bonds
6
Loan Syndication Market Overview (Continued)
The Exponential Surge in Supply of Syndicated Loans was driven by
large Leveraged Buyouts starting in 2005 thru the summer of 2007
$37.9
$40 Other
$33.0
$35 High Yield Hi Yield $11.25
$28.4
$30 Leveraged Loan
Hi Yield $11.3
$25 $22.3
$ in Billions
Hi Yield $13.22
Source: LoanConnector
100% 100%
(% of Investor Base)
80% 80%
(% Investor Base)
60% 60%
40% 40%
20% 20%
0% 0%
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
6/ 6
7
0
/0
30
Source: Deutsche Bank
M
LT
Over time, institutional investors have replaced banks as lenders with over 75% of demand 8
coming from institutional investors as of LTM 6/30/07
Loan Syndication Market Overview (Continued)
The Leverage Loan Syndication Supply and Demand Imbalance
Before (LTM June 30, 2007(1)) After (2nd Half 2007(2)) As of 12/05/07
($ in Billions)
$620 $620
$95 (15%)
Banks Primary
Issuance
$620
CLOs
$310 (50%)
(2)
(2)
Demand Supply
10
Types of Loan Syndication Formats
Underwritten deal
Best-efforts syndication
Club deal
11
Types of Loan Syndication Formats (Continued)
Underwritten deal
Arrangers guarantee the entire commitment, then syndicate the loan to reduce their exposure.
If the arrangers cannot fully subscribe the loan, they are forced to absorb the difference.
12
Types of Loan Syndication Formats (Continued)
Best-efforts syndication
The Arranger commits to underwrite less than the entire amount of the loan.
If the loan is undersubscribed, the deal may not close unless the terms/pricing/structure are changed.
Best-efforts syndications were used for risky borrowers or for complex transactions.
As in the case of underwriting, for preferred customers, the banks tend to hold higher exposure
justifying it by additional products offered going forward (an important variable in the banks
profitability calculations (RAROC- ratio of risk adjusted return to economic capital).
13
Types of Loan Syndication Formats (Continued)
Club deal
Typically a smaller loan (usually $25 million to $200 million but as high as $500 million)
The arranger is generally a first among equals, and each lender gets a full cut of the fees.
For preferred customers, the banks tend to hold higher exposure justifying it by additional
products offered going forward (an important variable in the banks profitability calculations
(RAROC).
14
The Loan Syndication Process
Arrangers will outline their syndication strategy and their view on the way the loan will price in market.
The arranger will prepare an information memo (IM) describing the terms of the transactions.
Bank meeting is scheduled at which potential lenders hear the management and the Investor group.
A deadline is given for the banks to send their commitment levels subject to final documentation
Each Bank analyzes the deals credit and assess the pricing (RORA). Each Issuer is assigned an internal rating.
The Arranger collects all commitments different amounts from each Bank
Allocations are given and Legal Documentation is sent for their final review.
If the Deal is Oversubscribed, the allocation of each bank will most likely be reduced
If the Deal is Undersubscribed, depending on the FLEX language, the pricing could be Flexed up.
16
After Review of Legal Documentation by each lender and signatures are sent, the Deal closes and funds.
The Loan Syndication Process (Continued)
Typical Internal Analysis Process by each bank
Requested amount that is within the rating parameters for each bank
Recommended amounts by Tranche (Revolving Credit / Term Loans)
Term and Conditions of the Loans (includes pricing, structure and covenants)
Profitability (RORA and RAROC)
Syndication strategy
Transaction discussion including Source and Uses and Capital Structure
Company discussion including historical performance and outlook
Corporate Structure
Management Biographies / Equity Sponsor Profile
Collateral Analysis
Industry Analysis
Financial Analysis (Projections Model)
Internal Rating Analysis This process will be
discussed following this
Internal Legal Review page
17
The Loan Syndication Process (Continued)
Most banks internal ratings are in line with the Agencies external ratings, though the analysis is
done independently. This analysis is based on two approaches:
The Typical Scale is 1-10, 1 being
Quantitative Analysis with very limited risk to default and
Qualitative Analysis 10 the issuer being in bankruptcy
with no chance of recovery
The Quantitative Analysis for establishing the Internal rating which measures the probability
of default is based on the following parameters (each component is weighted at a specific level
of importance):
Leverage Ratio - the relationship between debt and earnings (i.e. DEBT / EBITDA)
Capitalization Ratio the relationship between the bank debt and the rest of the capital
(Capital Leases, Bonds, Equity)
Coverage Ratio - Issuers Cash Flow covering its debt obligations (interest and principal
payments)
Variance of Projections based on the projections, the model typically assumes a certain
haircut (10-30%) to the managements projections and it tests its ability to pay its debt
obligations.
The Quantitative approach adjusts up or down based on industry characteristics (Recession
resistance, cyclical, or event driven).
The Qualitative Analysis is subjective based on each banks internal policy. The Analysis
would include strength of management, support from the equity sponsor, recovery analysis 17
(asset collateral) and outlook.
Typical Leveraged Deal Term Sheet / Credit Agreement
20
Typical Leveraged Deal Term Sheet / Credit Agreement (Continued)
3. Money Terms:
Amount / Tranches
Revolving Credit
Term Loans
Maturities
21
Typical Leveraged Deal Term Sheet / Credit Agreement (Continued)
4. Non-Money Terms:
Financial Covenants
Need Majority Vote (typical 51%) from the
Negative Covenants syndicate banks to amend these terms
Affirmative Covenants
22
Typical Leveraged Deal Term Sheet / Credit Agreement (Continued)
24
Typical Leveraged Deal Term Sheet / Credit Agreement (Continued)
Fee Letter
Interest Rate (Applicable Margin and Leveraged Grids)
Expenses
25
Typical Leveraged Deal Term Sheet / Credit Agreement (Continued)
LIBOR Floor
Original Issuer Discount (OID)
Margin Spread
28
Example of a Large Syndicated Loan
Harrahs Entertainment
TRANSACTION OVERVIEW
29
Example of a Large Syndicated Loan
Harrahs Entertainment
SOURCES: USES:
TERM L+ RATE COMM $ AMT % CAP $ AMT
Revolver 6 3.00% 7.25% 2,000.0 0.0 0.0% Purchase Shares 17,291.0
New Term Loan-B 7 3.00% 7.25% 7,250.0 7,250.0 23.2% Extra Cash 642.0
Total Bank Debt 9,250.0 7,250.0 23.2%
Existing Senior Debt 8 6.70% 4,624.0 14.8% Refinance Existing Debt 7,582.0
CMBS 5 7.50% 6,500.0 20.8% Fees & Expenses 1,106.0
Senior Unsecured Notes 10 10.75% 5,275.0 16.9% Rollover Debt 4,624.0
Senior Unsecured Notes (PIK) 10 10.75% 1,500.0 4.8%
Total Senior Sources 25,149.0 80.5% Total Uses 31,245.0
30
Example of a Large Syndicated Loan
Harrahs Entertainment
31
Example of a Large Syndicated Loan
Harrahs Entertainment
CORPORATE STRUCTURE
32
Example of a Large Syndicated Loan
Harrahs Entertainment
33
Example of a Large Syndicated Loan
Harrahs Entertainment
SYNDICATION GROUP
Lender
34
Example of a Large Syndicated Loan
Harrahs Entertainment
The general syndication of Harrah's was launched 1/15/2008 with a bank meeting in New York.
Over 1,000 bankers attended the general syndication meeting with commitments requested by
1/29/2008.
Unfortunately, given the: i) global correction in the financial markets on the week of January 21,
2008, ii) dramatic widening of high yield credit spreads and iii) reduction in the 3-month Libor Rate by
at least 120 bps that followed, the secondary market loan prices pulled back materially and bank
investors started to demand a much higher All-In Yield (about L+ 500) on primary market
transactions, like Harrah's.
Investors were demanding All-In Yield of between L+ 450 - 500 to commit/purchase Harrah's
Term Loan B. Since the offered TLB margin spread was L+300, investors were demanding a
discount (OID) of between 92-93 (compared to the original OID offer of 96.5) from the
Underwriters/Arrangers.
Following the failed syndication, Arrangers in order to reduce their exposure, were offering
Harrah's TLB with an OID in the low 90's.
35
Example of a Large Syndicated Loan
Harrahs Entertainment
At the time, given such low demand, it was reported that Credit Suisse started to quietly
syndicate their exposure prior to the commitment deadline (1/29/2008), independent of the other
Arrangers.
As a consequence, each of the Arrangers started to syndicate their own exposure to their own
investors offering as low as 90's OID to syndicate their exposure.
After that incident, there was a new agreement made between the Arrangers called The
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) where it prohibits one arranger to sell their exposure within an
agreeable period (6 months after the commitments are due) without the consent of the other
Arrangers.
36