COME NOW the respondents, through counsel, and to this Honorable Office, as Replyto the complainants Position Paper, most respectfully state: I. Contrary to the insinuation of the complainant in the Preparatory statement of hisPosition Paper. The complainant may have mistakenly entertained the idea that in every labor dispute, even if the employees claims or complaints are false and baseless, the same will beresolved in the workers favor. He has forgotten that the employer has also right and interest thatdeserves respect and protection:While the Constitution is committed to the policy of social justiceand the protection of the working class, it should not be supposedthat every labor dispute will be automatically decided in favor of labor. Management also has its own rights which, as such, areentitled to respect and enforcement in the interest of simple fair play.Out of its concern for those with less privileges in life, this Court hasinclined more often than not toward the worker and upheld his causein his conflicts with the employer. Such favoritism, however, has not blinded us to the rule that justice is in every case for the deserving, to be dispensed in the light of the established facts and the applicablelaw and doctrine.(Enriquez v. Bank of Philippine Islands 544 SCRA593, 2008)