Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Thank you, friends. Please take your seats. Everyone should be comfortable
because I will try to communicate as much as I can without the remaining minutes
of this meeting.
Mapping the Future of Judicial Reform. I hope it recognizes the fact that MAP
This will be I think my fifth speech before a large group of businessmen and
women since I assumed the Office of the Chief Justice. Some of you may have already
heard me talk about judicial reform and have heard me give updates. I have also met
some of you in various meetings, and you had conveyed to me the willingness to
help in judicial reform. And the forms you had discussed with me ranged from
Congress, and even gathering support from the administration and civil society
organizations All of these, I can assure you, have been deeply appreciated. But I have
always said that for everything, there is a season. So some of those offers have
1
actually been made more concrete by engagement and participation in some
communities that I have formed in the Supreme Court, and I am talking especially of
the judicial reform initiatives participation in some of our integrity discussions. The
regular briefings that we had been conducting are all intended to actually inform
you that we are always cognizant of the concerns and complaints of the business
community. And I thank Baby Nuesa [Head, Judicial Reform Initiative] for affirming
that we have this continued engagementa very professional and independent one
at that.
Whenever I speak of trying to keep a distance between the judiciary and the
business community, I have been met with understanding by you. And you have
allowed me sufficient space so that I and my colleagues as well as the officers of the
Court can work on judicial reform without any suspicion on anybodys part about
the proper bounds of our relationship and of course the fact that you continue to
Now let me go to the meat of my speech and what is the future that I envision
for the judiciary and how far are we from that future. And I will give you eight points
One, I believe that we can have a future in which the business communities
trust in the Philippine judiciary will be high enough that one day, we will see
increasing numbers of business contracts specify that the venue for the settlement
2
of disputes involving those contracts shall be one of the judiciarys key reform
courts. By this, I mean a venue such as Quezon City for now and additional metro
cities venues including Makati in the near future where the improvement in the
speed and quality of litigation has been remarkable. I know that you may be
skeptical at this point about such a future because the trend of course is for larger
settlement. But let me give you the reason why I have hope for that kind of future.
One reputable lawyer related that his recent court experiences in Quezon City
had been very positive as some of his cases had been tried for a short as six months.
his clients that the venue for contract disputes should be Quezon City. What did this
In 2012, the Quezon City Practice Guidelines was approved by the Supreme
Court. The Guidelines limit the kinds of pleadings that can be filed, prohibited
dilatory motions, observed strict timeframes. They cut down the length of time a
case is tried from 523 days to 194 days in civil cases. That is well-documented in our
reports. (applause) But because we have seen the recent phenomenon of some cases
being tried in as short a time as six months, we have even greater ambitions for the
future. In 2012 also, the Court approved the Judicial Affidavit Rule. Our judges
3
implemented it enthusiastically. It resulted in reducing the time for presenting the
In 2013, the Court also started to implement the Electronic Courts (e-Courts)
records all incidents in an IT (information technology) system that shows the age of
each case and highlights all incidents requiring action. It notifies judges of
deliverables and deadlines, provides them with templates of orders and decisions to
fast track their work. And they can issue order immediately after hearing. They can
target aged cases immediately and ultimately dramatically reduce case backlog.
As of December 2016, the Supreme Court with the support of the USAID
(United States Agency for International Development) and the ABA-ROLI (American
Bar Association-Rule of Law Initiative) project has deployed e-Courts in 197 courts
in eight cities nationwide. By 2017, this project will have deployed e-Courts in 297
courts in ten cities covering 30% of the trial courts total caseload. In 20182019, e-
Courts will be further rolled out in the rest of the National Capital Region as well as
in Regions 3 and 4A with the support of the European Union and also some of the
in our situationwe have more than 2,000 courts nationwide in more than 750
locationsyou will have to admit that there is something very dramatic that is
4
going on in one area of government because the e-Courts, all these 197 courts have
dispose and management their dockets. Can you imagine at the end of 2019 when
the rollout will have been able to manage around 40% of our dockets. Now, all of
these e-Courts have been supplied with sufficient laptops, printers, and connectivity.
experience has been, this judge will say, Your motion has been submitted for
resolution. And you would have to wait for around three months before you can
receive a written copy of the resolution of that motion. That is no longer the norm
for e-Courts and all those courts that are employing automated hearing.
The norm now is as soon as the motion is heard, the judge rules in open court,
the order is immediately inputted in the computer with all of them present. One
judge even bought a screen and put it behind her so that the order was being
inputted live with all the editing, it is printed to the computer of the stenographer or
the researcher, and it is immediately served to the parties right there on the spot in
as little as 15 minutes. So we do away with the snail mail system. Im not talking
about the long decisions because for long decisions, you have to go through all the
records, and you have to footnote all the records. But Im talking about motions the
5
resolution and hearing of which can eat up a great chunk of the total litigation time.
Can you imagine how psychologically that is a major breakthrough for the
practitioners who experienced that? Some have even taken selfies of them with the
orders that are immediately being served to them. Some detention prisoners have
even cried in open court because as soon as they hear that they are being released,
the order for their release is also handed down to them. (applause)
Program called the Hustisyeah! was piloted in Quezon City. At the end of the
Following the success in Quezon City, Hustisyeah! was rolled out in Makati,
Manila, Pasig, Angeles, Cebu, and Davao. As of June 2016, 15,227 cases
additional cities36%nothing like this has ever happened before. And the
and assigned them to all courts with heavy burdens, i.e. courts with more than
6
and it is expected to reduce the dockets of the 460 beneficiary courts and
hopefully produce the same dramatic results as those in the first seven cities.
it also became inevitably the first Justice Zone. A Justice Zone is an area where
criminal justice system. Would you believe that we were able to identify 88
action points from the time a crime is reported to the police all the way post-
one will result in the breaking down of the entire system. So what is the smart
management solution? Let all the actors talk to each other and coordinate
their efforts. And that is what we have created, and that is what we are
pushing for.
For example, do you know that many of the dismissals of drugs cases is
employ a simple solution: e-mail. The judges in Quezon City where it was
again piloted sends an e-mail to the central server of the PNP (Philippine
policeman does not appear, administrative sanctions are applied by the PNP.
(applause) So what is the result? A 97% attendance rate in Quezon City. So its
not police absence anymore that is causing the delay. It might be something
else but not the policemen anymore. And it was piloted also in Lapu-Lapu and
Angeles City in 2015 and 2016. And in all of these additional areas, the
attendance rate is still a good 77%still good. We are going to roll it out soon
in 637 courts in the NCR and in Regions 3, 5, 6, and 7. For Regions 1 and 4A,
training has commenced and will continue until the first quarter of 2017.
Also under the Justice Zone Project, we were able to have sector-wide
forensics, judicial affidavits, giving policemen templates they can use, protocol
on all the official activities of judges, prosecutors, and public attorneys within
the Justice Zone. So you dont have a cancellation of any hearing simply
because they were not able to look at each others calendars. We have also
8
detention prisoners especially in the most clogged courts. As a result, we have
agreed to share our inventory of all criminal cases that are pending with them.
Would you believe that the simple act of sharing our inventory helps them
also have a system for both the prosecution and the public attorneys as well?
Regional Trial Courts and six Metropolitan Trial Courts in the cities of Quezon
continuous trial court and your case is one of those, the litigants are
are set one day apart. It limits the promulgation of the decision to no later
than 90 days from submission of case for decision. You know what? Our data
even from this pilot Program has shown roughly 70% of these 58 courts were
able to comply with the mandatory periods set by the Rules of Court, 67%
from arraignment to pre-trial, and 91% for the promulgation for decision. So
Act, for the lawyers here, is no longer impossible to dream of. It used to be that
more covered courts nationwide until there is no doubt that judicial reform is
here to stay. Now, you see, our efforts did not go unnoticed.
was promulgated by a Makati City judge five months from the filing of the
information.
Program or the EJOW, the Courts Mediation Program, and the Small Claims
Courts system. Since its launch in 2009, EJOW has successfully improved
access to justice through mobile court hearings. From 2012 to date, EJOW has
the successful mediation of 261 cases, and the provision of legal aid to 3,568
10
prisoners together with medical and dental aid which we also have brought to
10,268 inmates.
200,000, our first level courts were able to dispose of in one year alone,
however, our court dockets still continue to carry 14,078 small claims cases
because I think the problem now is this. The high success rate is bringing in a
higher demand for judicial services. So we have to work even much harder
than before. That is the lesson. Its not a very welcome thought. But it seems to
11
To address the rise in the influx of new drugs cases, we have just added
240 more courts to our corps of drugs courts. So all 955 RTCs are now drugs
courts. And we have yet to see the impact of these new drugs courts because
presently, the new drugs cases comprise 29% of trial courts docket
nationwide.
Now, to clarify, I did not come here to promote only Quezon City but to
announce to all of you that what has been happening in Quezon City courts
will be the norm of the future. In the future, I believe that the trial period
Quezon City Practice Guidelines and the Continuous Trial system. And that
means that lawyers will have to go back to school because the rules are
changing fast. The draft consolidated Rules feature an expansion of the Judicial
Affidavit Rule. The draft Rules will require full use of IT and the service of
has broken historical records. The Court, for the first time in 2015, breached
the 5,000 cases marked when it disposed of 5,173 cases that year. In 2016, the
Court broke its own record by disposing 6,257 cases. So I hope please that
remarks that usually do not take off from data will stop attacking what is a
12
stereotypical judicial pace. And I hope that we will keep on improving that
the Rule of Procedure for Rehabilitation and Insolvency Cases. I will not
anymore go into that. The business executives here, you can just ask your
lawyers what it means for the speed and efficiency of handling financial
We are also training our commercial court judges not only in these Rules
also designated special cybercrime courts, and our judges are undergoing
approach in the justice sector. And now, under the leadership of the judiciary,
the Philippine Development Plan has dedicated a whole chapter to the justice
sector entitled Swift and Fair Administration of Justice. So you can see that
13
the reforms are actually broad, and they are intended to be not only deep but
broad, too.
The second point in the future I believe in. I believe we can have a future
in which the Rule of Law will be widely established, and those who make use
of shortcuts and deny the citizens right to due process are the exception. But
this future will only be possible if our partners in the criminal justice sector
will be looking to the judiciary to lead the way through the fair and speedy
percentage of trial court dockets consist of varied land cases and a great deal
of trial judges time is used up in dealing with these cases. These have
Rules, different substantive laws, and distinct timelines. This variety has
become a bane as it has confused not only the litigants but the judges as well
land cases. And we are also looking at the possibility of special courts and the
note, allow me to debunk a persistent myth that courts are issuing too many
2013 to date, the Court of Appeals has only issued only one TRO (temporary
2,039 petitions praying for a TRO on various subject matters, only 50 TROs
were issued by the CA or only 2.5%, and none of them involved a single
government infra project. Since 2012, the Supreme Court has only issued one
TRO against a government infra project involving the common train station of
the MRT (metro rail transit). Since the 1990s, the Court has issued seven
the myth; this is a myth that persists for a reason we dont know. We have
infra[structure] projects.
Four, I believe we can have a future in which the execution of final court
judgments will be done. And as a matter, of course, in the next few months,
groups will be convening to discuss the various ways to bring about the
15
expedient and efficient execution of court judgments. But we will not discuss
both. The sheer number of litigants in multi-party cases brings to the fore the
rules governing the Maguindanao massacre cases and regardless of the fact
that many keep on complaining about the way that the case is being handled,
look at the data. There are more than 190 accused in this case. For a criminal
case of such magnitude, out judge has been performing remarkably fast. She
handling this case. The prosecution has rested, and the defense is presenting
its evidence. And look at the kind of work that these cases entail. The court
has already heard a total of 233 witnesses: 131 for the prosecution, 58 private
complainants, and 44 for the defense. It has already resolved 12 sets of formal
offers of evidence and all bail applications of the 69 accused that applied for
bail except that of Unsay Ampatuan, Jr., which has just been submitted for
resolution. The case record has reached 119 volumes, and the transcript of
16
stenographic notes, 55 volumes. No matter how diligent our judge has been,
what we badly need is the full and consistent cooperation of the defense and
prosecution to conclude the trial soonest. I can assure you that the judiciary
has spared no effort to expedite this case. But the objective reality of the case
Procedure to streamline the rule on the filing and prosecution of class suits
and similarly massive suits. And I have some ideas here on how it can be done,
Six, we will see the judiciary truly enabled by ICT (information and
Systems (EISP) plan. E-Courts will see another level of upgrading in 2018 in
preparation for full court automation. So what will be the look of future
courts? Case records are digitized and available online. Voice recordings of
court hearings are immediate converted to written text through the use of
specialized software. Lawyers and litigants can file cases through web portals,
pay their fees online, check court documents and status of their cases through
the web, and get official notification through text or e-mail. Judges, lawyers,
have rehabilitated or constructed 93 halls of justice since 2012. There are still
160 projects in the pipeline with an estimated cost of P6.6 billion. We are
architects, increasing the staff of our Bids and Awards Committee, and hiring
procurement agents. Within the year, we hope to begin the inventory and
assessment of the status of all courthouses nationwide and get baseline data
to update our infrastructure master plan. And we will have a five-year and
Eightand this is my last point about the futurewe are aware that
our reform initiatives will not take flight unless we address issues of
corruption. From 20122016, by using our disciplinary powers, the Court has
dismissed 16 judges and one Sandiganbayan Justice, suspended 14, fined 101,
the lower courts employees, since 2010, we have dismissed 116, admonished
42, forfeited the benefits of 35, censured three, fined 240, reprimanded 221,
18
suspended 227. As of September 2016 also, the Court has disbarred 40
lawyers, suspended from practice 224, suspended from practice and notarial
practice 33, suspended exclusively from notarial practice 11, reprimanded 38,
fined and reprimanded three, admonished 86, censured three, warned eight,
fined and warned 338, ordered arrested 18, and dropped and stricken of the
hope that the chilling message that is being sent is correctly received. So I
(applause)
through the Judicial and Bar Council, in judicial education and training, in all
wide. No area is left untouched. But we have no time to talk about them now.
Let me now get to my point so that we have a balanced view. Despite all
of these positive gains and even greater potential gains, we have to face the
19
brazenly with public warnings against drug pushing or addiction. It is not
surprising that the perception of Rule of Law in our country has swung from
the administration of justice. Our country jumped nine places in 2015, from its
reform initiatives. For the year 2016, however, our rank has gone down to 70.
While the Philippine judiciary takes its cue only from the Constitution,
laws, and jurisprudential notions of independence and justice and thus will
must take the index as an indicator of the serious erosion of trust in the
criminal justice system, in the civil justice system, and in regulatory agencies
on how they have been discharging their roles in a way that has brought about
this state of affairs. The government pillars of criminal justice system, that is,
the judiciary, the Department of Justice and its attached agencies including the
National Prosecution Service and the National Bureau of Investigation, and the
20
Philippine National Police must come together to ponder on what kinds of
On the part of the judiciary, I can assure you that the effort to reform
has been relentless. If you believe that the judiciarys leadership is sincere,
what I will ask of you in turn is to continue to believe in the Rule of Law. It is
only when institutions faithfully comply with what the law requires can we
the improvements they are trying to carry out in their respective areas, share
with the necessary partners all the problems whose solutions require the help
of other institutions, mete out penalties for infractions when appropriate, and
digress from this path that our collective history and the Constitution have
marked out for us. Only by taking this path can we remain safely intact as a
people.
21
I also ask you to help the judiciary defend its reforms by not confusing
our role with those of the rest in the criminal justice sector. It is the role of the
and win the case on behalf of the state, and the role of judge is to be fair to
both the accused and the state by rendering judgment only on the basis of the
evidence. If the evidence is weak, the judge has no choice but to acquit the
I also ask you, before you accuse a judge of undue delay, do remember
that many times the judge cannot help but postpone a case if the prosecutor or
initiatives in which we have engaged you. I leave with the thought that to
support the judiciary is to support not only our democracy but also to
weaken the judiciary is to weaken our country. We can only ensure protection
22
of the rights of every citizen including those in the business community if we
23