Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
COMPARISON OF AUTOFRETTAGE
CALCULATION METHODS
G. PETER O'HARA
EDWARD TROIANO
JANUARY 2001
20010307 131
DISCLAIMER
The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the
The use of trade name(s) and/or manufacturer(s) does not constitute an official
endorsement or approval.
DESTRUCTION NOTICE
For unclassified, limited documents, destroy by any method that will prevent
collection of information, including suggestiGM .w. . tuv...y *..., *... .~ .. ^.--- . ,. -- -- - - ,;.-,,. -.0ov\., u * r,r ->ncnn
Davis Highway. Suite 1204. Arlington, VA 22202-4302. and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0183). Washington, DC 2050j.
1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED
January 2001 Final
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS
6. AUTHOR(S)
G. Peter O'Hara (Elmhurst Research, Albany, NY)
and Edward Troiano
High-pressure vessel designers and builders have used residual bore compression for about 150 years to extend the useful life of the vessel.
Casting, winding (wire or tape), shrinking, swaging, and autofrettage have produced the compression. All of these methods are
fundamentally nonlinear and present different levels of computational difficulty. The hydraulic autofrettage process has been in use for
over 70 years, and has been the subject of many analysis methods. This report uses several of the more popular methods that are in current
use and attempts to demonstrate the differences between them
The study uses an open-end, thick-wall cylinder of wall ratio W = 3 that is fabricated from a steel with a "soft" knee in the stress-strain
curve. This case presents a strong material nonlinearity under small deformation conditions, which are normal for autofrettage problems.
The baseline case is a finite element solution using isotropic plasticity, which is then solved using two other material models. These
solutions can then be compared with the classic Tresca and von Mises criteria along with the ASME Code solution. The curves for
autofrettage pressures versus percent overstrain are presented, along with residual stress versus radius for an autofrettage pressure that
produces the 56.5% overstrain condition of the baseline solution.
17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UL
NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)
Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION 1
GEOMETRY LOADING AND MATERIAL 1
ANALYSIS METHODS 2
RESULTS 2
DISCUSSION 3
CONCLUSION 4
REFERENCES 5
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
1. Autofrettage pressure versus percent overstrain for all six solution methods 6
6. Analysis using the von Mises failure criterion and perfect plasticity 8
100
Figure 1. Autofrettage pressure versus percent overstrain for all six solution methods.
CO
Q. " ^ s"'~'f ' -" "~ "~ "*~
-400
CO
CO \*' / Pressure = 1558 mPa
-800 /
in -
-1200
Radial
1600
N^
- ....
Radius
i .... i . .
m>
1.5 2.5
Radial
#iar :
loop
1iii|iiiif- TiiiIiiir
400 -
J^J~r^
-
0
C6
_ r -- -- -^P - - ~ "
-
-
-400
CO
to '- yS pressure = 1459 mPa i
-800
k,,
w
111 j
-1200
: Radius Radial
-1600 Hoop
, , . . i i i i i Jii
1 1.5 2.5
Figure 6. Analysis using the von Mises failure criterion and perfect plasticity.
8
400 1
CO
0
_
-400 -
to
CO
-800
in
-1200 -
1600 f-
Figure 7. Analysis using the Tresca failure criterion and perfect plasticity.
TECHNICAL REPORT INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION LIST
NO. OF
COPIES
TECHNICAL LIBRARY
ATTN: AMSTA-AR-CCB-O
OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE
ATTN: SIOWV-ODP-P
NOTE: PLEASE NOTIFY DIRECTOR, BENET LABORATORIES, ATTN: AMSTA-AR-CCB-O OF ADDRESS CHANGES.
TECHNICAL REPORT EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION LIST
NO. OF NO. OF
COPIES COPIES
COMMANDER
U.S. ARMY RESEARCH OFFICE
ATTN: TECHNICAL LIBRARIAN
P.O. BOX 12211
4300 S. MIAMI BOULEVARD
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709-2211
NOTE: PLEASE NOTIFY COMMANDER, ARMAMENT RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND ENGINEERING CENTER,
BENET LABORATORIES, CCAC, U.S. ARMY TANK-AUTOMOTIVE AND ARMAMENTS COMMAND,
AMSTA-AR-CCB-O, WATERVLIET, NY 12189-4050 OF ADDRESS CHANGES.