FACULTY OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL

ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING

ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
LAB REPORT BFC 32501
EXPERIMENT TITLE
COURSE CODE
DATE
GROUP NO.
GROUP MEMBERS 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
LECTURER/
INSTRUCTOR/ TUTOR
DATE OF REPORT
SUBMISSION
TSCR
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 SCR WT
(%)
Attendance Student in Student in laboratory Student in laboratory Student in laboratory just Student in laboratory 10
& Discipline laboratory more within 30 minutes to 1 within 10 to 30 minutes before laboratory start minutes earlier 1
than 1 hour late hour late late
Aim / - Purpose is not - Purpose is somewhat - Purpose is identified - Purpose is identified - Purpose is clearly identified
Purpose identified vague - Relevant variables are - Relevant variables are - Relevant variables are
- Relevant - Relevant variable are described in somewhat described described 1
variables are not not described unclear manner
described
Materials There is not a list Most lab materials All necessary lab All necessary lab All necessary lab materials
of the necessary included materials included but materials included and included and listed in an
lab materials not listed in any particular listed organized manner 1
order
Procedure Procedures are not Procedures are listed but Procedures are listed in - Procedures are listed in - Procedures are listed in clear
listed not in clear manner clear steps but not clear steps steps
numbered and/or - Each steps is numbered - Each step is numbered and in
complete sentences and in a complete a complete sentence 1
sentence - Diagram are included to
describe the set-up
Data Data not - Data lacks precision - Good representation of - Accurate representation - Accurate representation of
represented or is - Greater than 20% the data using tables or of the data using tables the data using tables or graphs
not accurate difference with accepted graphs or graph - Graphs and tables are
values - Less than 15% - Data is fairly precise labeled and titled. 4
difference with accepted - Less than 10% - Data is precise with less than
values difference with accepted 5% difference with accepted
- Precision is acceptable values values.
Analysis / - Trends / patterns - Trends / patterns are - Trends / patterns are - Trends / patterns are - Trends / patterns are logically
Result are not analyzed not analyzed logically analyzed for the logically analyzed analyzed
- Questions are not - Answer to questions are most part - Question are answered - Question are answered
answered incomplete - Questions are in complete sentences thoroughly and in complete 4
- Analysis is not - Analysis is inconsistent answered in complete - Analysis is thoughtful sentences
relevant sentences - Analysis is insightful
- Analysis is general
Discussion No discussion was A statement of the results A statement of the results - Accurate statement of - Accurate statement of the
included or shows is incomplete with little of the lab indicates the results of the lab results of the lab indicates
little effort and reflection on the lab whether result support indicates whether result whether result support the
reflection on the the hypothesis support the hypothesis hypothesis 4
lab - Possible sources of - Possible sources of error and
error identified what was learned from the lab
discussed
Participation Student was Participation was minimal Did the job but did not Used time pretty well. Showed interested, used time
(during hostile about appear to be very Stayed focused on the very well, guide other students
participation interested. Focus lost on experiment most of the and very focused on the 1
experiment) several occasion time experiment
Interview or Student cannot Student can answer Student can answer Student can explain the Student can explain the results
quiz answer questions some questions questions and begin to result in detail and the in detail and the ways in which
about the make connections ways in which they relate they relate to the research
experiment between the experiment to the research focus focus. Student can also 3
& application evaluate the significance of the
experiment to real situation

Total score

EXAMINER COMMENTS: APPROVAL STAMP

 STUDENT CODE OF ETHIC
(SCE)
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
FACULTY OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING

I, hereby confess that I have prepared this report on my own effort. I also
admit not to receive or give any help during the preparation of this report
and pledge that everything mentioned in the report is true.

___________________________
Student Signature

Name : _______________________________

Matric No:______________________________

Date :________________________________
1.0 Problem statement (include hypothesis/ expected results)
2.0 Aim
3.0 Methodology
3.1 Sampling procedure
3.2 Sampling location (include type of sample, with photo or diagram)
3.3 Apparatus
3.4 Equipment
3.5 Chemicals and reagent
3.6 Lab procedures
4.0 Data
5.0 Analysis
6.0 Discussion (should reflect the problem statement and hypothesis)
7.0 References