Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Evan Rule
April 16, 2017
d3 p
Z
1 p~
i~ x
X
asp~ us (~
p) + bs~p v s (~
(~x) = e p) , (2)
(2)3 2Ep
p
s=1,2
In d = 2, we may choose our spin basis such that u(p) = v(p), which implies
that
asp us (p) = bs s
p u (p), (4)
so that
asp = bsp (5)
for a Majorana fermion.
1
(b) Given that the field i is real, the Lagrangian has O(N ) symmetry. In
addition, show that there is a Z2 symmetry i 5 i , where 5 = 0 1 , which
anti-commutes with both 0,1 . Also show that this Z2 symmetry forbids the
mass term for the fermion.
/ i i 5 i ( 5 i ) = ( 5 )2 i i
i i / i = i i.
/ (7)
N N
!2 N
!2
1X N g2 X 1 g2 X
L= / i 2
i i + i i + i i
2 i 4g N i 4N i
(9)
N N
1X N 1 X
= / i 2 2
i i i i ,
2 i 4g 2 i
and rescale i N i ,
N N
!
1X 1 1 X
L=N / i 2 2
i i i . (10)
2 i 4g 2 i
Discuss why only the one-loop diagram of in the presence of the external
lines needs to be included in the large N limit.
N = V P = 1 L, (11)
L = P V + 1. (12)
Given the interaction vertex , there are no tree level diagrams which contain
only external lines. Therefore the dominant contribution to these diagrams
2
will be the one loop diagrams, which go like N 0 . All higher loop diagrams are
suppressed by higher factors of 1/N .
(d) Obtain the effective potential for in the large N limit by integrating over
, and minimize it to find the ground state. Note that the fermionic integral
comes with a minus sign relative to that of the bosonic integral. Given that a
Majorana fermion in 2D has only one degree of freedom
m2 (cl )
1
V = + m2 (cl ) log 1 , (13)
8 2
Solution: Since our goal is to compute the effective potential, we take the
auxiliary field to be a constant (x) = 0 . Anticipating that we will eventually
need to use dimensional regularization, we work in d dimensions. In order for
the coupling to remain dimensionless, we must introduce a term with mass
dimension 1 2d
0 i i 2 0 i i . (14)
Then the functional integral over fermion fields is
Z Z h iN/2
2d 2d
Di Di exp i dd xi i/ 2 0 i = Det i/ 2 0 ,
(15)
where Det denotes a functional determinant. Since i has only one real degree
of freedom the determinant is raised to the power N/2 instead of N . To compute
this determinant, we first use the trick
2d
2d
Det i/ 2 0 = exp Tr log i/ 2 0 , (16)
where Tr denotes both a functional trace and a matrix trace. Now we Fourier
transform and take the functional trace over position:
2d
Z dd p Z 2d
Tr log i/ 2 0 = d
dd x tr log p/ 2 0 , (17)
(2)
where tr is now just the matrix trace. Now we use the fact that
2d
2d
tr log p/ 2 0 = log det p/ 2 0 (18)
3
and compute
2d
2d
/ 2 0 = det p0 p1 2 0 1
0 1
det p
0 i 0 1 2d 1 0
= det p0 ip1 2 0
i 0 1 0 0 1
" 2d
!#
2 0 ip0 ip1
= det 2d
ip0 ip1 2 0
= p2 + 2d 02 .
(19)
Hence
dd p
Z Z
2d
d
log p2 + 2d 02
Tr log i/ 2 0 = d x
(2)d
! (20)
i d2
Z
= dd x d/2
.
(4)d/2 (2d 02 )
Taking d = 2 2 yields
i02
Z
2 4 1
+ 1 1 + log 2
Tr log i/ 0 = d x 1 + log 2
4 0
2 2
Z
2 i 0 1
= d x + log 2 + 1 + log 4 .
4 0
(21)
02 02
Z Z
2 1 2
D exp i d x N 1 log 2 2 0 (23)
8 4g
2 2
1
Vef f (0 ) = 2 02 + N 0 log 02 1 . (25)
4g 8
4
Minimizing this potential yields
Vef f 1 N 2
2 = 2+ log 02 = 0
0 4g 8
2 (26)
= 02 = 2 e2/g N
2
= 0 = e/g N
.
This non-zero VEV generates a non-zero mass term for the fermions:
0 i i , (27)
which breaks chiral symmetry. Although the VEV is renormalization scheme de-
pendent, the chiral symmetry breaking is not because the VEV will be non-zero
in all schemes and so the same symmetry-breaking mass term will be generated.
(e) Work out the 1PI two-point function for and show that it has a zero
at p2 = 4m2 . Namely is a bound state of two fermions with zero binding
energy.
Solution: