Soil Investigation

Method Statement
FOR
Soil Investigation
PREPARED BY JUNE 2010

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Title Page
Table of Contents..1
List of Appendix....................................................................................................................................... 2
List of Table............................................................................................................................................. 2
List of Figures.......................................................................................................................................... 2
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACK GROUND OF THE PROJECT ....................................................... 3
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................................................... 3
3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND BOUNDARY SURVEY ..3

3.1 General .................................................................................................................................. 3
3.2 Boring and Sampling .4
3.4 Groundwater Measurement................................................................................................ ...4
3.5 Field permeability Test ..4
3.6 Soil Resistivity Test ...5
3.7 Test Pit.5
3.8 Down Hole Seismic Test .5
3.9 Dutch Cone Penetration Test .....5
3.10 Site Boundary Survey
4.0 LABORATORY TEST ..6

4.1 Unconfined Compression test .6
4.2 Atterberg Limits .6
4.3 Particle Size Analysis ...6
4.4 Unit Weight and Water Content Determination.7
4.5 Oedometer test ..7
4.6 Compaction Test and CBR Test 7
4.7 Water Analysis .7
5.0 REPORT ....8
Figures
Appendix
Tables
1
List of Appendix
Appendix A Sample of Soil Boring Log data sheet

Appendix B Sample of Summary of general laboratory test data sheet
Appendix C Sample of Pile calculation data sheet
Appendix D Sample of Shallow Foundation Bearing Capacity Analysis
Appendix E Sample of Prediction of long term settlement calculation
List of Table
Table 1 Sample of Unconfined Compression Test data sheet

Table 2 Sample of Atterberg Limit Test data sheet
Table 3 Sample of Sieve Analysis Test data sheet
Table 4 Sample of Unit Weight data sheet
Table 5 Sample of Water content Test data sheet
Table 6 Sample of Consolidation Test data sheet
Table 7 Sample of Field Permeability test data sheet
Table 8 Sample of soil resistivity test data sheet
Table 9 Sample of down hole seismic test data sheet
Table 10 Sample of Dutch cone penetration test data sheet
Table 11 Sample of compaction and CBR test data sheet
Table 12 Sample water analysis test data sheet
2
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACK GROUND OF THE PROJECT

This method statement will summarizes the procedure on the subsoil investigation works and
boundary survey to be conducted by Infratech ASTM Company Limited for the
construction
..
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

The scope of work for the geotechnical consultancy services of the project are summarized as
follows:
Soil boring, field testing and carrying out sufficient in-situ testing and sampling.
Laboratory testing of obtained samples to determine the properties of the subsoil.
Determination of geotechnical parameters required for foundation analyses.
Carrying out engineering analyses for foundation design.
3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION
3.1 General
The investigation program included drilling boreholes and collecting soil samples at desired
intervals for subsequent observation and laboratory testing.
The investigation program will consist of soil boring and sampling at desired intervals for
subsequent observation and laboratory testing to determine the capacity of pile foundation economically
and safely.
3.2 Boring and Sampling

The boreholes will be made by the rotary drilling machine.
Undisturbed sample will be taken in the soft and medium clay at 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 m depths
and at 1.5 m intervals thereafter using a thin-walled sampler with dimensions conforming to standard
sampling tubes specification (ASTM D 1587).
Disturbed samples for very stiff clay to hard clay layer will be collected during Standard
Penetration Testing at 1.5 m intervals. (ASTM D 1586)
The borings shall be drilled vertically through soil approximately 30 meters deep or stop in firm
layer when SPT N-value is greater than 50 blows/ft.
Accuracy of bore hole position will be not more than 2.0 m. in horizontal direction and 0.20 in
vertical direction.
3.3 Standard Penetration Testing

Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) will be carried out to provide an indication of the density
and/or consistency of the ground and to obtain disturbed samples for visual inspection and laboratory
testing and classification. The results of the tests will be given on the boring logs in Appendix A and will
3
be expressed as an N value. The N value is defined as the blow-count for 12 (300mm) penetration
recorded after the seating drive of 15 cm. In the case of premature refusal conditions, the number of
blows for a recorded penetration (including the seating drive) is noted.
In SPT testing, the rope-and-pulley (R-P) method will be used. This consisted of a hollow
cylindrical mass sliding over a steel rod. It is operated by lifting the mass with a rope over a cat head. At
the instant the mass reached the required height (760 mm), the mass will be released manually driving
the split spoon into the soil. Disturbed samples collected from the split-spoon sampler during Standard
Penetration Test will be visually inspected before storing in a polyethylene bag for laboratory testing. A
graphical representation of the changes in the soil strata, water levels and SPT N values will be given in
the boring logs.
3.4 Groundwater Measurement

Groundwater is one element that affects in the stability and foundation analyses. The
groundwater level was measured 24 hours after completion of the borehole.
However, the low permeability of the soil will mean that the water level in the borehole is
controlled more by drilling fluid rather than by the ground water itself. Significant fluctuations in the
location of ground water table should be anticipated throughout the year, depending upon the amount of
precipitation, evaporation and surface runoff.
3.5 Field Permeability Test

Permeability test of soil in the field will be performed at the depth of 2,4,6,8 and 10 m. by
constant head method.
3.6 Soil Resistity Test (Provisional)

The purpose of this test is to investigate for the need of cathode protection and to have data
necessary for the design of an adequate grounding system.
The soil Resistivity measurement shall be carried out in accordance with IEEE 81 standard
Guide for Measuring Earth Resistivity, Ground Impedance and Earth Surface Potentials of a Ground
System . The measurement shall be done using Wenner Four Points Method with equal test rods
spacing.
The area to be measured shall be the power block area of power plant, terminal substation and
switchyard. Before carrying out the measurement, the rectangular grid shall be drawn for the testing
areas with mesh spacing at approximately 5-10 m. The measurement shall be made at every intersection
point of grid lines. The measurement at any point shall be done for two directions, one from the
measured point along the direction from east to west and another shall be from the measured point
along the direction from north to south. The measurement at any point shall consist of the measured data
at the varying space between test rods for the following distance; 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 m. For each
area of measurement, the results of measurement shall be shown in the table for each point of
measurement for each direction and every designated space of measurement. The measured resistivity
data shall be averaged for each of the same spacing of measured data. The overall averaged resistivity
of each area shall also be reported.
3.7 Test Pit (Provisional)

Test pit shall be preformed 3 points of 1x1m size 3 m deep, by mean of hand excavation. Bulk
sample taken from the test pits of not less than 50 kg each shall be sent to test at laboratory for
compaction and CBR test.
4
3.8 Seismic down hole test (Provisional)

The down hole Test is a method which determines soil stiffness properties by analyzing direct
compression and shear waves along a borehole.
Seismic down hole test shall be performed at 1.0 meter intervals to the depth of 30.0 m. or to the
same depth of soil bore hole (where SPT N-value is greater than 50 blows/ft)
The test shall be intended to collect shear wave velocity information that will be used in dynamic
analysis. The testing location shall be located in the power block area and close to expected location of
Steam Turbine foundation.
3.9 Dutch Cone Penetration Test (Provisional)

Dutch cone penetration test shall be preformed depth 30m. or to the depth when the total
resistant of the cone penetrometer reach 4.0 tons.
The test shall be carried out in accordance with the ASTM D 3441.
The cone penetration test shall be consists of pushing into the soil, at a sufficiently slow rate, a
series of cylindrical rods with a conical tip at the base for measuring the cone resistance and friction
resistance every 20 cm intervals.
4.0 LABORATORY TESTING

Geotechnical laboratory tests will be performed on the soil samples to classify soil and to
determine their engineering characteristics. All laboratory tests will be conducted in accordance with
ASTM Standards. The soils will be also classified based on the Unified Soil Classification System
(USCS).
4.1 Unconfined Compression Tests

Unconfined compression test will be conducted in accordance with ASTM D2166. The tests will
be performed by compressing cylindrical samples to failure. Failure generally occurs when the greatest
ratio of shear stress to shear strength occurs. The cohesion (c) of the sample is taken as half the
unconfined compressive strength.
Sample of test results and data sheet has been shown in Table 1
4.2 Atterberg Limits

Atterberg limits will be determined (ASTM D 4318) on representative soil samples of cohesive
soils. The Atterberg limits refer to arbitrarily defined boundaries between the liquid and plastic states,
and between the plastic and brittle states of grained soils, expressed as water content, in percentage.
The liquid limit is the water content at which a part of soil placed in a standard cup, cut by a standard
grooving tool, will flow together at the base of the groove when the cup is subjected to 25 standard
shocks. The one-point liquid limit test is usually carried out and distilled water may be added during soil
mixing to achieve a desired consistency.
5
4.3 Particle Size Analysis
Particle size analysis will be performed by means of sieving (ASTM D 422). For oven-dry
materials, sieving is carried out for particles that are being retained on a 0.063 mm sieve. In sieve
analysis, the mass of soil retained on each sieve is determined and expressed as a percentage of the
total mass of the sample. The particle size is plotted on a logarithmic scale so that two soils having the
same degree of uniformity are represented by curves of the distribution plot. In Hydrometer analysis is
based on the principle of sedimentation of soil grains in water. When a soil specimen is dispersed in
water, the particles settle at different velocities, depending on their shape, size, and weight. For
simplicity, it is assumed that soil particles are spheres and the velocity of soil particles can be express by
Stokes law.
4.4 Unit Weight and Water Content Determination

As a routine laboratory test, unit weights of soils will be determined based on the mass of soil in
a standard volume steel cylinder with cutting edge. The unit weight refers to the unit weight of the soil at
the sampled water content. The dry unit weight is determined from the mass and the water content of the
specimen.
Water content (ASTM D 2216)is determined by oven-drying a moist/wet soil at a constant

temperature of 105 C for 18 - 24 hours. The difference in mass before and after drying is used as the
mass of water in the specimen, while the mass of remaining material is used as the mass of solid
particles. The ratio between the mass of water and the mass of solid particles is the water content of the
soil material
Sample of test results and data sheet has been shown in Table 4 and Table 5
4.5 Oedometer Test /Consolidation test (Provisional)

In case of soft clay layer has been encountered, 1 undisturbed sample will be collected from mid
layer of soft clay for Oedometer test.
Oedometer tests will be conducted (ASTM D 2435) to determine the rate and magnitude of
consolidation of a laterally restrained soil specimen which is axially loaded in increments of constant
stress until the excess pore water pressures have dissipated for each increment. Each load increment is
maintained for at least 24 hours. The test is generally carried out on undisturbed cohesive specimens.
4.6 Compaction Test and CBR Test (Provisional)

Bulk sample taken from the test pits of not less than 20 kg each shall be sent to test at laboratory
for compaction and CBR test conformed to ASTM D1883.
4.7 Ground Water Analysis

The bored hole shall be drilled at depth approximate 3 m. without bentonite and leave it 7 days
for collecting underground water to do water analysis test.
The test parameters are listed below:
6
5.0 REPORT
Confirmed Preliminary Report findings along with the remainder of test results to be
Submitted in a Final Report.
The Final Report shall include but not limited to:
Results of all of the above mentioned tests.

Result of graph to show Cumulative Ultimate Skin Friction & Ultimate End
Bearing Capacity & Depth for driven pile for each borehole.
Recommendations for :
1. Bearing capacity for shallow foundation.
2. Pile capacity resistance to compression and tension.
3. Settlement for shallow foundation.
Underground water level and borehole elevation.
Licensed engineer sign up responsible for the report
7
APPENDIX A
SOIL BORING LOG

Sample Sheet
ASTM ASTM TESTING CO., LTD.
BORING LOG
Borehole No. BH-08 BH-0
PROJECT: SIAM ENERGY POWER PLANT Page 1 of 1 24
LOCATION: BANGKLA CHACHOENGSAO
Atterberg Limits
Graphic Log
Sample No.
SPT-N (Blow/30cm.)
Depth (m)
Recovery
Method
40 80 20 40 60 80 100
SOIL DESCRIPTION
t (t/m3) Su (t/m2)
1.0 2.0 2 4 6 8 10
0 Borehole Elevation = 1.99 m.
0.80 m. Top soil
ST 1 2.00 m. 1.49 1.01
ST 2 Brown, 1.6 1.3

moist to saturated, medium plasticity,
very soft to soft, Sandy Clay.
5 ST 3 (CL) 1.69 2.14
ST 4 6.50 m. 1.7 0.54
SS 1 Brown, moist, high plasticity, 1.81 9

stiff, Sandy Clay.
(CH)
SS 2 9.45 m. 10
10
SS 3 Brown, moist, medium plasticity, 1.96 22

very stiff to hard, Sandy Clay.
(CL)
SS 4 12.45 m. 1.85 31
SS 5 1.89 14
15
SS 6 Brown, moist, high plasticity, 1.96 16
stiff to very stiff,
Sandy Clay.
SS 7 (CH) 15
trace gravel.
SS 8 17
20 SS 9 19.95 m. 22
SS 10 58
Brown, moist, medium plasticity,
hard, Sandy Clay.
SS 11 (CL) 76
24.45 m. 1.93
SS 12
End of Boring = 24.45 m.
Start date: 8-..-09

Finished date: 8-..-09 PL W n LL Su (UC)
Borehole Depth: 24.45 m. Su (FV)
Observed GWL. -1.50 m. Total Unit Weight Su (PP)
Drilling Foreman: Thawatchai SPT, N
ABBREVIATIONS: (Blow/30 cm.)
ST = Undisturbed Sample LL = Liquid Limit gt = Total Unit Weight
SS = Split Spoon Sample PL = Plastic Limit SPT = Standard Penetration Test
APPENDIX B
SUMMARY OF GENERAL LABORATORY TEST
Sample sheet
ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
PROJECT: BORE HOLE NO. BH - 8

LOCATION: Water Level : -1.50 M.
Depth. (m.) USCS Wn,at UC Test wet, Atterberg Limits Gradation % Passing Nspt
Sample No From To Soil Received SU gm./cc. LL PL PI #4 # 10 # 40 # 200 (Blow / Soil Description

2
(T / m )
group (%) (%) (%) (%) Foot)
- 0.00 1.50 Top Soil
ST - 1 1.50 2.00 88.34 1.01 1.49 97.74 93.07 86.41 75.43
ST - 2 3.00 3.50 61.41 1.30 1.60
ST - 3 4.50 5.00 CL 55.20 2.14 1.69 40.05 24.33 15.72 100.00 99.77 98.51 94.33
ST - 4 6.00 6.50 54.24 0.54 1.70 Sandy Clay (CL,CH).
SS - 1 7.50 7.95 CH 31.07 1.81 56.08 23.51 32.56 99.04 98.92 98.11 91.63 9
SS - 2 9.00 9.45 10
SS - 3 10.50 10.95 CL 22.04 1.96 48.11 21.29 26.82 100.00 99.85 99.29 95.86 22
SS - 4 12.00 12.45 1.85 31
SS - 5 13.50 13.95 1.89 14
SS - 6 15.00 15.45 1.96 16
SS - 7 16.50 16.95 CH 32.88 60.30 28.53 31.77 93.45 91.79 89.23 85.09 15 Sandy Clay (CH)
SS - 8 18.00 18.45 17 trace gravel.
SS - 9 19.50 19.95 22
SS - 10 21.00 21.45 58
SS - 11 22.50 22.95 CL 17.82 41.11 18.58 22.54 99.70 99.30 96.57 82.52 76 Sandy Clay (CL).
SS - 12 24.00 24.45 1.93 89
END OF BORING AT 24.45 M.

Appendix C
Pile Calculation
Sample sheet
Appendix B 1 - BH-1

(Estimation of Soil Bearing Capacity)
Saraburi A Cogeneration Co.,ltd.

Saraburi
BH-1
PROJECT : Saraburi A Cogeneration Co.,ltd.
LOCATION : Saraburi
BOREHOLE NO.: BH-1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0
Depth (m)
5
Ultimate End Bearing(t/sq.m.)
SOIL BEARING CAPACITY VS DEPTH FOR SHALLOW FOUNDATION

SHALLOW FOUNDATION SOIL BEARING CAPACITY
Project: Saraburi A Cogeneration Co.,ltd.
Location: Saraburi
Borehole No.: BH-1
Factor of safety : 3.00
Allowable settlement, Se 25.0 mm.
Depth of water = 1.53 m below ground level
Depth Soil Description Unit weight SPT (N-value) vo,base 'vo,base Cohesion, Su FDN Dimension NET SOIL BEARING CAPACITY SUMMARY
USCS S=Sand Field Correct Design B L CLAY SAND Depth qall
Df C=Clay t/m2 kN/m2 NF Ncor. Ndesign t/m2 t/m2 kN/m2 t/m2 kN/m2
o
m. m. qu (kPa) qall (kPa) qall (t/m2) Fd qall (kPa) qall (t/m2) (m) (t/m2)
0.0 - - 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.0 CL C 2.0 19.6 9 20 13 2.00 2.00 19.62 7.89 77.39 1.0 1.0 572.8 190.9 19.5 1.0 19.5
2.0 CL C 2.0 19.6 12 20 15 4.00 3.53 34.63 9.15 89.80 1.0 1.0 775.4 258.5 26.3 2.0 26.3
3.0 CL C 2.0 19.6 15 22 17 6.00 4.53 44.44 10.83 106.28 1.0 1.0 1048.8 349.6 35.6 3.0 35.6
4.0 CL C 2.1 20.2 20 26 22 8.06 5.59 54.84 13.83 135.72 1.0 1.0 1506.8 502.3 51.2 4.0 51.2
Remark: 1) qall = Net allowable soil bearing capacity

2) Corected Standard Penetration, N correct = NF*sqrt(95.6/'v), After Liao and Whitman (1986)
3) The net ultimate bearing capacity for clayey soil ( = 0 condition), qnet(u) = 5.14cu(1+0.2Df/B)(1+0.2B/L) , After Skempton (1951)
4) The net ultimate bearing capacity for sand, After Bowles (1977)
qnet(u) = 19.16Ncor Fd (Se /25.4) (for B < 1.22 m.)
qnet(u) = 11.98Ncor [(3.28B+1)/3.28B]2 Fd (Se /25.4) (for B > 1.22 m.)
Appendix B 2 - BH-1
(Recommendation for Pile Capacity and length)

Saraburi
BH-1
RECOMMENDED PILE LENGTH AND CAPACITY FOR FOR SINGLE PILE

Location: Saraburi
Borehole No.: BH-1
Soil Capacity F.S. =2.5(Tons) Pile Structural

Pile Type Pile Size Length(m.) Compression Tension Lateral Capacity(Tons) REMARK
Driven Pile 0.25x0.25 12.0 39 32 0.2 40 Can not be installed when SPT>=Limit
Bored Pile Dia.0.35 10.0 44 35 0.3 48
Bored Pile Dia.0.40 11.5 61 49 0.4 63
Bored Pile Dia.0.50 13.0 94 74 0.5 98
Bored Pile Dia.0.60 14.5 140 105 0.7 141
Driven Pile may not be installed pass through depth where SPT limit >= 50
RECOMMENDED ALLOWABLE LOAD FOR SINGLE SQUARE DRIVEN PILE

Location: Saraburi
Borehole No.: BH-1
Depth of water : 1.53 m. below ground level
25 x 25 cm. Square Driven Pile 30 x 30 cm. Square Driven Pile 35 x 35 cm. Square Driven Pile 40 x 40 cm. Square Driven Pile
Depth
Cumm.Skin End Pile Allowable Cumm.Skin End Pile Allowable Cumm.Skin End Pile Allowable Cumm.Skin End Pile Allowable
(meters) Friction Bearing Weight Load Friction Bearing Weight Load Friction Bearing Weight Load Friction Bearing Weight Load
(tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons)
4.0 19.4 8.3 0.5 10.9 23.3 11.9 0.6 13.8 27.2 16.2 0.9 17.0 31.1 21.2 1.2 20.4
5.0 25.5 10.0 0.6 14.0 30.6 14.5 0.9 17.7 35.8 19.7 1.2 21.7 40.9 25.7 1.5 26.0
7.5 42.0 11.6 1.0 21.1 50.4 16.7 1.4 26.3 58.9 22.7 1.9 31.9 67.3 29.6 2.5 37.8
9.0 54.5 16.3 1.2 27.9 65.5 23.5 1.7 34.9 76.4 32.0 2.4 42.4 87.3 41.8 3.1 50.4
10.5 66.7 15.9 1.4 32.4 80.0 22.9 2.1 40.3 93.4 31.1 2.8 48.7 106.7 40.6 3.6 57.5
12.0 79.9 18.1 1.7 38.6 95.9 26.1 2.4 47.9 111.9 35.6 3.2 57.7 127.9 46.4 4.2 68.0
13.5 94.9 21.4 1.9 45.8 113.9 30.8 2.7 56.8 132.9 41.9 3.7 68.4 151.9 54.7 4.8 80.7
15.0 112.2 24.5 2.1 53.8 134.6 35.3 3.0 66.7 157.0 48.1 4.1 80.4 179.4 62.8 5.4 94.7
REMARK : 1. Negative skin friction is not consider in the calculation
2. Pile cut-off elevation -1.00 m. below ground level

RECOMMENDED ALLOWABLE LOAD FOR SINGLE BORED PILE

Location: Saraburi
Borehole No.: BH-1
Depth of water : 1.53 m. below ground level
35 cm. Dia. Bored Pile 40 cm. Dia. Bored Pile 50 cm. Dia. Bored Pile 60 cm. Dia. Bored Pile
Depth
4.0 31.2 12.8 0.7 17.3 35.7 16.7 0.9 20.6 44.6 26.0 1.4 27.7 53.6 37.5 2.0 35.6
5.0 41.1 15.5 0.9 22.3 47.0 20.2 1.2 26.4 58.7 31.5 1.9 35.4 70.5 45.4 2.7 45.3
7.5 67.7 17.8 1.5 33.6 77.3 23.3 2.0 39.5 96.7 36.4 3.1 52.0 116.0 52.4 4.4 65.6
9.0 87.8 25.1 1.8 44.4 100.4 32.8 2.4 52.3 125.5 51.3 3.8 69.2 150.5 73.9 5.4 87.6
10.5 107.4 24.4 2.2 51.8 122.7 31.9 2.9 60.7 153.4 49.9 4.5 79.5 184.0 71.8 6.4 99.8
12.0 128.7 27.9 2.5 61.6 147.1 36.5 3.3 72.1 183.8 57.0 5.2 94.3 220.6 82.1 7.5 118.1
13.5 152.8 32.9 2.9 73.1 174.6 43.0 3.8 85.5 218.3 67.1 5.9 111.8 261.9 96.7 8.5 140.1
15.0 180.6 37.8 3.2 86.0 206.4 49.3 4.2 100.6 257.9 77.1 6.6 131.4 309.5 111.0 9.5 164.4

Appendix B 3 - BH-1
Graph
(Cumulative Ultimate Skin Friction & Ultimate End
Bearing Capacity & Depth)
BH-1
LOCATION : Saraburi
BOREHOLE NO.: BH-1
0 50 100 150 200 0 200 400 600 800 1,000

0 0
2 2
4 4
6 6
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
8 8
10 10
12 12
14 14
16 16
Ultinate Skin Friction(t/m.Perimeter) Ultimate End Bearing(t/sq.m.)
CUMMULATIVE ULTIMATE SKIN FRICTION AND ULTIMATE END BEARING CAPACITY VS DEPTH OF DRIVEN PILE
LOCATION : Saraburi
BOREHOLE NO.: BH-1
0 50 100 150 200 0 200 400 600 800 1,000

0 0
2 2
4 4
6 6
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
8 8
10 10
12 12
14 14
16 16
Ultinate Skin Friction(t/m.Perimeter) Ultimate End Bearing(t/sq.m.)
CUMMULATIVE ULTIMATE SKIN FRICTION AND ULTIMATE END BEARING CAPACITY VS DEPTH OF BORED PILE
Appendix B 4
( Driven Pile Calculation)

Saraburi
BH-1
SINGLE SQUARE DRIVEN PILE CAPACITY CALCULATION-STATIC FORMULA

Location: Saraburi
Borehole No.: BH-1
Pile size : 0.25 x 0.25 m.
Area: 0.063 m2
Perimeter : 1.000 m
Depth of water = 1.53 m from ground level
Depth Soil Description Unit Unit SPT (N-value) vo 'tip 'tip 'ave 'ave Su Nq Ks Adh. qb qs Qb Qs Qs Qs Wp Qu Qa
To USCS S=Sand Weight Weight Field Liao Corr. Factor Cumm. Cumm.
C=Clay t/m2 kN/m2 t/m2 t/m2 kN/m2 t/m2 kN/m2 t/m2
o
0.80 t/m2 t/m2 tons tons tons t/m. peri tons tons tons
0.0 - - 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 9 20 13 2.00 2.00 19.62 1.00 9.81 7.89 - - - - 0.55 73.0 4.4 4.6 4.4 4.4 4.4 0.0 8.9 3.6
2.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 12 20 15 4.00 3.53 34.63 2.77 27.12 9.15 - - - - 0.50 86.4 4.5 5.4 4.5 8.9 8.9 0.2 9.8 5.7
3.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 15 22 17 6.00 4.53 44.44 4.03 39.53 10.83 - - - - 0.46 103.5 4.9 6.5 4.9 13.9 13.9 0.3 11.1 8.0
4.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 20 26 22 8.06 5.59 54.84 5.06 49.64 13.83 - - - - 0.40 132.6 5.6 8.3 5.6 19.4 19.4 0.5 13.4 10.9
5.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 25 30 27 10.12 6.65 65.24 6.12 60.04 16.72 - - - - 0.37 160.6 6.1 10.0 6.1 25.5 25.5 0.6 15.6 14.0
7.5 CL C 2.1 20.40 30 31 30 15.32 9.35 91.72 8.00 78.48 18.88 - - - - 0.35 185.2 6.6 11.6 16.5 42.0 42.0 1.0 27.1 21.1
9.0 SC C 2.1 20.60 44 41 43 18.47 11.00 107.91 10.18 99.82 26.96 - - - - 0.31 261.1 8.3 16.3 12.5 54.5 54.5 1.2 27.6 27.9
10.5 SC C 2.0 19.62 43 38 41 21.47 12.50 122.63 11.75 115.27 25.83 - - - - 0.31 253.9 8.1 15.9 12.1 66.7 66.7 1.4 26.6 32.4
12.0 SC C 2.0 19.42 50 42 47 24.44 13.97 137.05 13.24 129.84 29.53 - - - - 0.30 290.2 8.8 18.1 13.2 79.9 79.9 1.7 29.7 38.6
13.5 CL C 2.0 19.42 60 48 56 27.41 15.44 151.47 14.71 144.26 34.93 - - - - 0.29 341.8 10.0 21.4 15.0 94.9 94.9 1.9 34.5 45.8
15.0 SG C 2.1 20.11 70 53 64 30.49 17.02 166.92 16.23 159.19 40.20 - - - - 0.29 392.3 11.5 24.5 17.2 112.2 112.2 2.1 39.7 53.8
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0
15.0
15.0
Remark: 1) Negative skin friction is not consider in the calculation

2) Pile cut-off level is at - 1.00 m. below ground level
3) Limited maximum end bearing, qb = 1000 t/sq.m. for sand (Reese and O' Neill, 1989)
4) Corected Standard Penetration, Ncorrect = NF*sqrt(95.6/'v), (Liao and Whitman, 1986)

Location: Saraburi
Borehole No.: BH-1
Pile size : 0.30 x 0.30 m.
Area: 0.090 m2
Perimeter : 1.200 m
o
0.0 - - 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 9 20 13 2.00 2.00 19.62 1.00 9.81 7.89 - - - - 0.55 73.0 4.4 6.6 5.2 5.2 4.4 0.0 11.8 4.7
2.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 12 20 15 4.00 3.53 34.63 2.77 27.12 9.15 - - - - 0.50 86.4 4.5 7.8 5.5 10.7 8.9 0.2 13.0 7.3
3.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 15 22 17 6.00 4.53 44.44 4.03 39.53 10.83 - - - - 0.46 103.5 4.9 9.3 5.9 16.6 13.9 0.4 14.8 10.2
4.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 20 26 22 8.06 5.59 54.84 5.06 49.64 13.83 - - - - 0.40 132.6 5.6 11.9 6.7 23.3 19.4 0.6 17.9 13.8
5.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 25 30 27 10.12 6.65 65.24 6.12 60.04 16.72 - - - - 0.37 160.6 6.1 14.5 7.4 30.6 25.5 0.9 20.9 17.7
7.5 CL C 2.1 20.40 30 31 30 15.32 9.35 91.72 8.00 78.48 18.88 - - - - 0.35 185.2 6.6 16.7 19.8 50.4 42.0 1.4 35.1 26.3
9.0 SC C 2.1 20.60 44 41 43 18.47 11.00 107.91 10.18 99.82 26.96 - - - - 0.31 261.1 8.3 23.5 15.0 65.5 54.5 1.7 36.8 34.9
10.5 SC C 2.0 19.62 43 38 41 21.47 12.50 122.63 11.75 115.27 25.83 - - - - 0.31 253.9 8.1 22.9 14.6 80.0 66.7 2.1 35.4 40.3
12.0 SC C 2.0 19.42 50 42 47 24.44 13.97 137.05 13.24 129.84 29.53 - - - - 0.30 290.2 8.8 26.1 15.9 95.9 79.9 2.4 39.6 47.9
13.5 CL C 2.0 19.42 60 48 56 27.41 15.44 151.47 14.71 144.26 34.93 - - - - 0.29 341.8 10.0 30.8 18.0 113.9 94.9 2.7 46.0 56.8
15.0 SG C 2.1 20.11 70 53 64 30.49 17.02 166.92 16.23 159.19 40.20 - - - - 0.29 392.3 11.5 35.3 20.7 134.6 112.2 3.0 53.0 66.7
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0
15.0
15.0


Location: Saraburi
Borehole No.: BH-1
Pile size : 0.35 x 0.35 m.
Area: 0.123 m2
Perimeter : 1.400 m
o
0.0 - - 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 9 20 13 2.00 2.00 19.62 1.00 9.81 7.89 - - - - 0.55 73.0 4.4 8.9 6.1 6.1 4.4 0.0 15.1 6.0
2.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 12 20 15 4.00 3.53 34.63 2.77 27.12 9.15 - - - - 0.50 86.4 4.5 10.6 6.4 12.5 8.9 0.3 16.7 9.1
3.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 15 22 17 6.00 4.53 44.44 4.03 39.53 10.83 - - - - 0.46 103.5 4.9 12.7 6.9 19.4 13.9 0.6 19.0 12.6
4.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 20 26 22 8.06 5.59 54.84 5.06 49.64 13.83 - - - - 0.40 132.6 5.6 16.2 7.8 27.2 19.4 0.9 23.1 17.0
5.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 25 30 27 10.12 6.65 65.24 6.12 60.04 16.72 - - - - 0.37 160.6 6.1 19.7 8.6 35.8 25.5 1.2 27.1 21.7
7.5 CL C 2.1 20.40 30 31 30 15.32 9.35 91.72 8.00 78.48 18.88 - - - - 0.35 185.2 6.6 22.7 23.1 58.9 42.0 1.9 43.9 31.9
9.0 SC C 2.1 20.60 44 41 43 18.47 11.00 107.91 10.18 99.82 26.96 - - - - 0.31 261.1 8.3 32.0 17.5 76.4 54.5 2.4 47.1 42.4
10.5 SC C 2.0 19.62 43 38 41 21.47 12.50 122.63 11.75 115.27 25.83 - - - - 0.31 253.9 8.1 31.1 17.0 93.4 66.7 2.8 45.3 48.7
12.0 SC C 2.0 19.42 50 42 47 24.44 13.97 137.05 13.24 129.84 29.53 - - - - 0.30 290.2 8.8 35.6 18.5 111.9 79.9 3.2 50.9 57.7
13.5 CL C 2.0 19.42 60 48 56 27.41 15.44 151.47 14.71 144.26 34.93 - - - - 0.29 341.8 10.0 41.9 21.0 132.9 94.9 3.7 59.2 68.4
15.0 SG C 2.1 20.11 70 53 64 30.49 17.02 166.92 16.23 159.19 40.20 - - - - 0.29 392.3 11.5 48.1 24.1 157.0 112.2 4.1 68.1 80.4
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0
15.0
15.0


Location: Saraburi
Borehole No.: BH-1
Pile size : 0.40 x 0.40 m.
Area: 0.160 m2
Perimeter : 1.600 m
o
0.0 - - 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 9 20 13 2.00 2.00 19.62 1.00 9.81 7.89 - - - - 0.55 73.0 4.4 11.7 7.0 7.0 4.4 0.0 18.7 7.5
2.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 12 20 15 4.00 3.53 34.63 2.77 27.12 9.15 - - - - 0.50 86.4 4.5 13.8 7.3 14.3 8.9 0.4 20.7 11.1
3.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 15 22 17 6.00 4.53 44.44 4.03 39.53 10.83 - - - - 0.46 103.5 4.9 16.6 7.9 22.2 13.9 0.8 23.7 15.2
4.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 20 26 22 8.06 5.59 54.84 5.06 49.64 13.83 - - - - 0.40 132.6 5.6 21.2 8.9 31.1 19.4 1.2 28.9 20.4
5.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 25 30 27 10.12 6.65 65.24 6.12 60.04 16.72 - - - - 0.37 160.6 6.1 25.7 9.8 40.9 25.5 1.5 34.0 26.0
7.5 CL C 2.1 20.40 30 31 30 15.32 9.35 91.72 8.00 78.48 18.88 - - - - 0.35 185.2 6.6 29.6 26.4 67.3 42.0 2.5 53.5 37.8
9.0 SC C 2.1 20.60 44 41 43 18.47 11.00 107.91 10.18 99.82 26.96 - - - - 0.31 261.1 8.3 41.8 20.0 87.3 54.5 3.1 58.7 50.4
10.5 SC C 2.0 19.62 43 38 41 21.47 12.50 122.63 11.75 115.27 25.83 - - - - 0.31 253.9 8.1 40.6 19.4 106.7 66.7 3.6 56.4 57.5
12.0 SC C 2.0 19.42 50 42 47 24.44 13.97 137.05 13.24 129.84 29.53 - - - - 0.30 290.2 8.8 46.4 21.2 127.9 79.9 4.2 63.4 68.0
13.5 CL C 2.0 19.42 60 48 56 27.41 15.44 151.47 14.71 144.26 34.93 - - - - 0.29 341.8 10.0 54.7 24.0 151.9 94.9 4.8 73.9 80.7
15.0 SG C 2.1 20.11 70 53 64 30.49 17.02 166.92 16.23 159.19 40.20 - - - - 0.29 392.3 11.5 62.8 27.6 179.4 112.2 5.4 85.0 94.7
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0 392.3 112.2
15.0
15.0
15.0

Appendix B 5
( Bored Pile Calculation)

Saraburi
BH-1
SINGLE BORED PILE CAPACITY CALCULATION-STATIC FORMULA

Location: Saraburi
Borehole No.: BH-1
Pile Dia.(m.) : 0.35
Area: 0.096 m2
Perimeter : 1.400 m
o
0.0 - - 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 9 20 13 2.00 2.00 19.62 1.00 9.81 7.89 - - - - 0.55 73.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 0.0 14.1 5.6
2.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 12 20 15 4.00 3.53 34.63 2.77 27.12 9.15 - - - - 0.50 86.4 5.2 8.3 7.3 14.4 10.3 0.2 15.4 9.0
3.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 15 22 17 6.00 4.53 44.44 4.03 39.53 10.83 - - - - 0.46 103.5 5.7 10.0 8.0 22.3 15.9 0.5 17.5 12.7
4.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 20 26 22 8.06 5.59 54.84 5.06 49.64 13.83 - - - - 0.40 132.6 6.4 12.8 8.9 31.2 22.3 0.7 21.0 17.3
5.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 25 30 27 10.12 6.65 65.24 6.12 60.04 16.72 - - - - 0.37 160.6 7.0 15.5 9.9 41.1 29.4 0.9 24.4 22.3
7.5 CL C 2.1 20.40 30 31 30 15.32 9.35 91.72 8.00 78.48 18.88 - - - - 0.35 185.2 7.6 17.8 26.6 67.7 48.3 1.5 42.9 33.6
9.0 SC C 2.1 20.60 44 41 43 18.47 11.00 107.91 10.18 99.82 26.96 - - - - 0.31 261.1 9.6 25.1 20.1 87.8 62.7 1.8 43.4 44.4
10.5 SC C 2.0 19.62 43 38 41 21.47 12.50 122.63 11.75 115.27 25.83 - - - - 0.31 253.9 9.3 24.4 19.5 107.4 76.7 2.2 41.8 51.8
12.0 SC C 2.0 19.42 50 42 47 24.44 13.97 137.05 13.24 129.84 29.53 - - - - 0.30 290.2 10.2 27.9 21.3 128.7 91.9 2.5 46.7 61.6
13.5 CL C 2.0 19.42 60 48 56 27.41 15.44 151.47 14.71 144.26 34.93 - - - - 0.29 341.8 11.5 32.9 24.1 152.8 109.1 2.9 54.1 73.1
15.0 SG C 2.1 20.11 70 53 64 30.49 17.02 166.92 16.23 159.19 40.20 - - - - 0.29 392.3 13.2 37.8 27.8 180.6 129.0 3.2 62.3 86.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0
15.0
15.0


Location: Saraburi
Borehole No.: BH-1
Area: 0.126 m2
Perimeter : 1.600 m
o
0.0 - - 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 9 20 13 2.00 2.00 19.62 1.00 9.81 7.89 - - - - 0.55 73.0 5.0 9.2 8.0 8.0 5.0 0.0 17.2 6.9
2.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 12 20 15 4.00 3.53 34.63 2.77 27.12 9.15 - - - - 0.50 86.4 5.2 10.9 8.4 16.4 10.3 0.3 18.9 10.8
3.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 15 22 17 6.00 4.53 44.44 4.03 39.53 10.83 - - - - 0.46 103.5 5.7 13.0 9.1 25.5 15.9 0.6 21.5 15.2
4.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 20 26 22 8.06 5.59 54.84 5.06 49.64 13.83 - - - - 0.40 132.6 6.4 16.7 10.2 35.7 22.3 0.9 26.0 20.6
5.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 25 30 27 10.12 6.65 65.24 6.12 60.04 16.72 - - - - 0.37 160.6 7.0 20.2 11.3 47.0 29.4 1.2 30.3 26.4
7.5 CL C 2.1 20.40 30 31 30 15.32 9.35 91.72 8.00 78.48 18.88 - - - - 0.35 185.2 7.6 23.3 30.4 77.3 48.3 2.0 51.7 39.5
9.0 SC C 2.1 20.60 44 41 43 18.47 11.00 107.91 10.18 99.82 26.96 - - - - 0.31 261.1 9.6 32.8 23.0 100.4 62.7 2.4 53.4 52.3
10.5 SC C 2.0 19.62 43 38 41 21.47 12.50 122.63 11.75 115.27 25.83 - - - - 0.31 253.9 9.3 31.9 22.3 122.7 76.7 2.9 51.4 60.7
12.0 SC C 2.0 19.42 50 42 47 24.44 13.97 137.05 13.24 129.84 29.53 - - - - 0.30 290.2 10.2 36.5 24.4 147.1 91.9 3.3 57.5 72.1
13.5 CL C 2.0 19.42 60 48 56 27.41 15.44 151.47 14.71 144.26 34.93 - - - - 0.29 341.8 11.5 43.0 27.6 174.6 109.1 3.8 66.8 85.5
15.0 SG C 2.1 20.11 70 53 64 30.49 17.02 166.92 16.23 159.19 40.20 - - - - 0.29 392.3 13.2 49.3 31.7 206.4 129.0 4.2 76.8 100.6
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0
15.0
15.0


Location: Saraburi
Borehole No.: BH-1
Area: 0.196 m2
Perimeter : 2.000 m
o
0.0 - - 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 9 20 13 2.00 2.00 19.62 1.00 9.81 7.89 - - - - 0.55 73.0 5.0 14.3 10.1 10.1 5.0 0.0 24.4 9.8
2.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 12 20 15 4.00 3.53 34.63 2.77 27.12 9.15 - - - - 0.50 86.4 5.2 17.0 10.5 20.5 10.3 0.5 27.0 14.8
3.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 15 22 17 6.00 4.53 44.44 4.03 39.53 10.83 - - - - 0.46 103.5 5.7 20.3 11.4 31.9 15.9 0.9 30.7 20.5
4.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 20 26 22 8.06 5.59 54.84 5.06 49.64 13.83 - - - - 0.40 132.6 6.4 26.0 12.8 44.6 22.3 1.4 37.4 27.7
5.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 25 30 27 10.12 6.65 65.24 6.12 60.04 16.72 - - - - 0.37 160.6 7.0 31.5 14.1 58.7 29.4 1.9 43.8 35.4
7.5 CL C 2.1 20.40 30 31 30 15.32 9.35 91.72 8.00 78.48 18.88 - - - - 0.35 185.2 7.6 36.4 37.9 96.7 48.3 3.1 71.3 52.0
9.0 SC C 2.1 20.60 44 41 43 18.47 11.00 107.91 10.18 99.82 26.96 - - - - 0.31 261.1 9.6 51.3 28.8 125.5 62.7 3.8 76.3 69.2
10.5 SC C 2.0 19.62 43 38 41 21.47 12.50 122.63 11.75 115.27 25.83 - - - - 0.31 253.9 9.3 49.9 27.9 153.4 76.7 4.5 73.3 79.5
12.0 SC C 2.0 19.42 50 42 47 24.44 13.97 137.05 13.24 129.84 29.53 - - - - 0.30 290.2 10.2 57.0 30.5 183.8 91.9 5.2 82.3 94.3
13.5 CL C 2.0 19.42 60 48 56 27.41 15.44 151.47 14.71 144.26 34.93 - - - - 0.29 341.8 11.5 67.1 34.5 218.3 109.1 5.9 95.7 111.8
15.0 SG C 2.1 20.11 70 53 64 30.49 17.02 166.92 16.23 159.19 40.20 - - - - 0.29 392.3 13.2 77.1 39.7 257.9 129.0 6.6 110.1 131.4
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0
15.0
15.0


Location: Saraburi
Borehole No.: BH-1
Area: 0.283 m2
Perimeter : 2.400 m
o
0.0 - - 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 9 20 13 2.00 2.00 19.62 1.00 9.81 7.89 - - - - 0.55 73.0 5.0 20.6 12.1 12.1 5.0 0.0 32.7 13.1
2.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 12 20 15 4.00 3.53 34.63 2.77 27.12 9.15 - - - - 0.50 86.4 5.2 24.4 12.6 24.6 10.3 0.7 36.3 19.3
3.0 CL C 2.0 19.62 15 22 17 6.00 4.53 44.44 4.03 39.53 10.83 - - - - 0.46 103.5 5.7 29.3 13.6 38.2 15.9 1.4 41.5 26.5
4.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 20 26 22 8.06 5.59 54.84 5.06 49.64 13.83 - - - - 0.40 132.6 6.4 37.5 15.3 53.6 22.3 2.0 50.8 35.6
5.0 CL C 2.1 20.21 25 30 27 10.12 6.65 65.24 6.12 60.04 16.72 - - - - 0.37 160.6 7.0 45.4 16.9 70.5 29.4 2.7 59.6 45.3
7.5 CL C 2.1 20.40 30 31 30 15.32 9.35 91.72 8.00 78.48 18.88 - - - - 0.35 185.2 7.6 52.4 45.5 116.0 48.3 4.4 93.5 65.6
9.0 SC C 2.1 20.60 44 41 43 18.47 11.00 107.91 10.18 99.82 26.96 - - - - 0.31 261.1 9.6 73.9 34.5 150.5 62.7 5.4 103.0 87.6
10.5 SC C 2.0 19.62 43 38 41 21.47 12.50 122.63 11.75 115.27 25.83 - - - - 0.31 253.9 9.3 71.8 33.5 184.0 76.7 6.4 98.9 99.8
12.0 SC C 2.0 19.42 50 42 47 24.44 13.97 137.05 13.24 129.84 29.53 - - - - 0.30 290.2 10.2 82.1 36.6 220.6 91.9 7.5 111.2 118.1
13.5 CL C 2.0 19.42 60 48 56 27.41 15.44 151.47 14.71 144.26 34.93 - - - - 0.29 341.8 11.5 96.7 41.3 261.9 109.1 8.5 129.5 140.1
15.0 SG C 2.1 20.11 70 53 64 30.49 17.02 166.92 16.23 159.19 40.20 - - - - 0.29 392.3 13.2 111.0 47.6 309.5 129.0 9.5 149.1 164.4
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0 392.3 129.0
15.0
15.0
15.0

Appendix C
Pile Calculation
Sample sheet
Project: Nong Saeng Power Plant - Saraburi

Location: Factory Area
Borehole No.: BH-2
Pile size : 0.25 x 0.25 m.
Area: 0.063 m2
Perimeter : 1.000 m
Depth of water = -0.80 m from ground level
Soil Description Depth Avg. Unit Unit SPT (N-value) vo 'tip 'tip 'ave 'ave Su Nq Ks Adh. qb qs Qb Qs Qs Qs Wp Qu Qa
USCS S=Sand To Depth Weight Weight Field Liao Corr. Factor Cumm. Cumm.
C=Clay m t/m^3 kN/m^3 t/m2 t/m2 kN/m2 t/m2 kN/m2 t/m2
o
- - 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
CH C 3.0 1.50 2.12 20.80 9 15 0.59 6.36 3.36 32.96 1.68 16.48 2.25 - - - - 1.00 183.9 2.3 11.5 6.8 6.8 6.8 0.0 18.2 7.3
CH C 7.0 3.50 2.12 20.80 15 17 0.90 14.84 7.84 76.91 5.60 54.94 3.75 - - - - 0.95 200.7 3.6 12.5 14.2 21.0 21.0 0.6 32.9 13.2
CL C 13.5 6.75 2.12 20.80 24 19 1.25 28.62 15.12 148.33 11.48 112.62 6.00 - - - - 0.64 231.2 3.8 14.5 25.0 45.9 45.9 1.6 58.8 23.5
SM S 16.0 8.00 2.13 20.90 51 38 1.36 33.95 17.95 176.04 16.53 162.18 12.75 28 8 0.50 22 - 451.0 6.8 28.2 17.0 63.0 63.0 2.0 89.2 35.7
SP S 17.5 8.75 2.13 20.90 80 56 1.42 37.14 19.64 192.67 18.79 184.35 20.00 42 80 0.50 34 - 676.2 12.5 42.3 18.7 81.7 81.7 2.2 121.8 48.7
SP-SM S 18.5 9.25 2.13 20.90 100 68 1.46 39.27 20.77 203.75 20.21 198.21 25.00 51 108 0.50 41 - 822.0 17.4 51.4 17.4 99.1 99.1 2.3 148.2 59.3


Borehole No.: BH-2
Pile size : 0.30 x 0.30 m.
Area: 0.090 m2
Perimeter : 1.200 m
o
- - 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
CH C 3.0 1.50 2.12 20.80 9 15 0.59 6.36 3.36 32.96 1.68 16.48 2.25 - - - - 1.00 183.9 2.3 16.6 8.1 8.1 6.8 0.0 24.7 9.9
CH C 7.0 3.50 2.12 20.80 15 17 0.90 14.84 7.84 76.91 5.60 54.94 3.75 - - - - 0.95 200.7 3.6 18.1 17.1 25.2 21.0 0.9 42.4 16.9
CL C 13.5 6.75 2.12 20.80 24 19 1.25 28.62 15.12 148.33 11.48 112.62 6.00 - - - - 0.64 231.2 3.8 20.8 30.0 55.1 45.9 2.3 73.7 29.5
SM S 16.0 8.00 2.13 20.90 51 38 1.36 33.95 17.95 176.04 16.53 162.18 12.75 28 8 0.50 22 - 451.0 6.8 40.6 20.4 75.6 63.0 2.8 113.3 45.3
SP S 17.5 8.75 2.13 20.90 80 56 1.42 37.14 19.64 192.67 18.79 184.35 20.00 42 80 0.50 34 - 676.2 12.5 60.9 22.5 98.0 81.7 3.1 155.8 62.3
SP-SM S 18.5 9.25 2.13 20.90 100 68 1.46 39.27 20.77 203.75 20.21 198.21 25.00 51 108 0.50 41 - 822.0 17.4 74.0 20.9 119.0 99.1 3.3 189.6 75.8


Borehole No.: BH-2
Pile size : 0.35 x 0.35 m.
Area: 0.123 m2
Perimeter : 1.400 m
o
- - 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
CH C 3.0 1.50 2.12 20.80 9 15 0.59 6.36 3.36 32.96 1.68 16.48 2.25 - - - - 1.00 183.9 2.3 22.5 9.5 9.5 6.8 0.0 32.0 12.8
CH C 7.0 3.50 2.12 20.80 15 17 0.90 14.84 7.84 76.91 5.60 54.94 3.75 - - - - 0.95 200.7 3.6 24.6 19.9 29.3 21.0 1.2 52.8 21.1
CL C 13.5 6.75 2.12 20.80 24 19 1.25 28.62 15.12 148.33 11.48 112.62 6.00 - - - - 0.64 231.2 3.8 28.3 35.0 64.3 45.9 3.1 89.5 35.8
SM S 16.0 8.00 2.13 20.90 51 38 1.36 33.95 17.95 176.04 16.53 162.18 12.75 28 8 0.50 22 - 451.0 6.8 55.2 23.8 88.2 63.0 3.8 139.6 55.8
SP S 17.5 8.75 2.13 20.90 80 56 1.42 37.14 19.64 192.67 18.79 184.35 20.00 42 80 0.50 34 - 676.2 12.5 82.8 26.2 114.4 81.7 4.3 193.0 77.2
SP-SM S 18.5 9.25 2.13 20.90 100 68 1.46 39.27 20.77 203.75 20.21 198.21 25.00 51 108 0.50 41 - 822.0 17.4 100.7 24.4 138.8 99.1 4.6 234.9 94.0


Borehole No.: BH-2
Pile size : 0.40 x 0.40 m.
Area: 0.160 m2
Perimeter : 1.600 m
o
- - 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
CH C 3.0 1.50 2.12 20.80 9 15 0.59 6.36 3.36 32.96 1.68 16.48 2.25 - - - - 1.00 183.9 2.3 29.4 10.8 10.8 6.8 0.0 40.2 16.1
CH C 7.0 3.50 2.12 20.80 15 17 0.90 14.84 7.84 76.91 5.60 54.94 3.75 - - - - 0.95 200.7 3.6 32.1 22.7 33.5 21.0 1.5 64.1 25.6
CL C 13.5 6.75 2.12 20.80 24 19 1.25 28.62 15.12 148.33 11.48 112.62 6.00 - - - - 0.64 231.2 3.8 37.0 40.0 73.5 45.9 4.0 106.5 42.6
SM S 16.0 8.00 2.13 20.90 51 38 1.36 33.95 17.95 176.04 16.53 162.18 12.75 28 8 0.50 22 - 451.0 6.8 72.2 27.3 100.8 63.0 5.0 167.9 67.2
SP S 17.5 8.75 2.13 20.90 80 56 1.42 37.14 19.64 192.67 18.79 184.35 20.00 42 80 0.50 34 - 676.2 12.5 108.2 30.0 130.7 81.7 5.6 233.3 93.3
SP-SM S 18.5 9.25 2.13 20.90 100 68 1.46 39.27 20.77 203.75 20.21 198.21 25.00 51 108 0.50 41 - 822.0 17.4 131.5 27.9 158.6 99.1 6.0 284.2 113.7

RECOMMENDED ALLOWABLE LOAD FOR SINGLE SQUARE DRIVEN PILE

Borehole No.: BH-2
Depth of water : -0.80 m. below ground level
25 x 25 cm. Square Driven Pile 30x30 cm. square Driven Pile 35x35 cm. square Driven Pile 40x40 cm. square Driven Pile
Depth
13.5 46 14 2 24 55 21 2 29 64 28 3 36 73 37 4 43
16.0 63 28 2 36 76 41 3 45 88 55 4 56 101 72 5 67
17.5 82 42 2 49 98 61 3 62 114 83 4 77 131 108 6 93
18.5 99 51 2 59 119 74 3 76 139 101 5 94 159 132 6 114

PROJECT : Nong Saeng Power Plant - Saraburi
LOCATION : Factory Area
BOREHOLE NO.: BH-2
Cumm. Ultimate Skin Friction Ultimate End Bearing

(t/m of Perimeter) (t/sq.m)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 200 400 600 800 1,000

0 0
2 2
4 4
6 6
8 8
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
10 10
12 12
14 14
16 16
18 18
20 20
CUMMULATIVE ULTIMATE SKIN FRICTION AND ULTIMATE END BEARING CAPACITY VS DEPTH OF SINGLE SQUARE DRIVEN PILE
Appendix D
Bearing Capacity and

Shallow Foundation
Sample sheet data

SPT Correlation Program - NovoSPT(Pro) 1.8.0.51
Novo Tech Software Ltd.

www.NovotechSoftware.com
Developed by : Alireza Afkhami-Aghda
This copy of program is licensed to : Poosit Sunlakaviset
all calculations are done for SPT blow count N60=15 at depth 7.92 m; Corrected SPT N1(60)~13 after Liao and Whitman 1986
Table i : Input data and assumptions. Table ii : Soil layers from existing ground.
Input Parameter Value Thickness Unit
Footing B (m) 1 ( )
3 W
16.5i ht
Footing L (m) 1 4.3 18.7
Footing Df (m) 0.9 5 17.5
Footing P (kPa) 100
Safety factor FS 3
Apply ground water No
Ground ti water level -
(Pile
) length (m) 5
Pile diameter (m) 0.4
Table iii : In-situ SPT test results.

Depth (m) SPT N60
0.3 Bl
34 C 32
0.61 12 11
0.91 18 17
1.22 26 25
1.52 23 22
1.83 25 24
2.13 43 41
2.44 22 21
2.74 21 20
3.05 17 16
3.35 18 17
3.66 20 19
3.96 19 18
4.27 25 24
4.57 23 22
4.88 24 23
5.18 25 24
5.49 22 21
5.79 24 23
6.1 24 23
6.4 26 25
6.71 28 26
7.01 18 17
7.32 20 19
7.62 24 23
7.92 16 15
Table 16 : Young's Modulus (Es).
Source Young's Modulus Es Comments Ref# Var.
(kPa)
Schultze and Muhs, 1967 36409 Sand 41 N1(60)
D'Appolonia et al., 1970 35772 Sand (normally consolidated) 41 N1(60)
Tan et al., 1991 15000 Sand (normally consolidated) N60
Bowles, 1996 and Denver, 1982 27111 Sand (normally consolidated) 25 N60
Bowles, 1996 90000 Sand (normally consolidated) 25 N60
Bowles, 1996 50099 Sand (normally consolidated) 25 N60
Bowles, 1996 7500 Sand (saturated) 25 N60
Bowles, 1996 41250 Sands (all normally consolidated): average value 25 N60
Bowles, 1996 55750 Sand (over consolidated) OCR=1 25 N60
Bowles, 1996 25200 Gravelly sand 25 N60
Kulhawy and Mayne, 1990 7500 Sands with fines N60
Kulhawy and Mayne, 1990 15000 Clean sands (normally consolidated) N60
Kulhawy and Mayne, 1990 22500 Clean sands (over consolidated) N60
Tan et al., 1991 12600 Gravelly sand N60
Tan et al., 1991 9600 Clayey sand N60
Tan et al., 1991 6300 Silts, sandy silt, or clayey silt N60
Ghahramani and Behpoor, 1989 2550 Saturated clays, N60<25 7 N60
Skempton, 1986 23550 N60
Papadopoulos, 1992 19500 25 N60
Mezenbach, 1961 10150 Fine sand (above water level) 25 N60
Mezenbach, 1961 14450 Fine sand (below water level) 25 N60
Mezenbach, 1961 10650 Sand (medium) 25 N60
Mezenbach, 1961 19550 Coarse sand 25 N60
Mezenbach, 1961 22000 Sand and gravel 25 N60
Mezenbach, 1961 10350 Silty sand 25 N60
Mezenbach, 1961 9900 Silt 25 N60
Stroud, 1988 ~ 7500 to 30000 Weak rocks 47 N60

Table 17 : Undrained Shear Strength (Su) of Clays.
Source Undrained shear Comments Ref# Var.
strength Su (kPa)
Terzaghi and Peck, 1967 98 N60
Meyerhof, 1956 150 N60
Peck et al., 1974 75 N1(60)
Ghahramani and Behpoor, 1989 112 based on over 100 data in Iran, N60<25 7 N60
Decourt, 1989 158 from triaxial UU tests 47 N60
Stroud, 1974 68 Insensitive overconsolidated clays 47 N60
Stroud, 1989 68 PI=15% N60
Stroud, 1989 82 PI=50% N60
Stroud, 1989 75 In-sensitive weak rock with N60<200 N60
Sowers, 1979 ~ 38 to 69 Clayey sands (SC) and Silts (ML) N60
Sowers, 1979 ~ 69 to 150 Lean clays (CL) N60
Sowers, 1979 ~ 150 to 259 Fat clays (CH) N60
Stroud and Butler, 1975 ~ 60 to 90 valid for N60>5 N60
Japanese Road Association - valid for N60<5 N60
Reese, Touma and O'Neill, 1976 105 N60
Kulhawy and Mayne, 1990 90 30 N60
Hara et al., 1974 204 30 N60
Ajayi and Balogun, 1988 95 39 N60
Hatef and Keshavarz, 2004 104 based on 482 SPT and unconfined compression tests in Shiraz 39 N60
city (Iran)
Tavares, 1988 105 for clays in Brazil 39 N60
Table 18 : Other Correction Factors.

Source Correction Factor Comments Ref# Var.
Skempton, 1986 1 Borehole Diameter Factor, Cb N60
Skempton, 1986 1 Sampling Method Factor, Cs N60
Skempton, 1986 0.94 Rod Length Factor, Cr N60
Skempton, 1986 1 Energy Ratio Factor, Ce N60

Table 19 : Depth Correction Factor (Cn).
Source Depth Correction Comments Ref# Var.
Factor Cn
Gibbs and Holtz, 1957 1.64 equation by Teng, 1962 N60
Samson et al., 1986 0.82 N60
Peck and Bazaraa, 1969 0.85 N60
Peck, Hanson and Thornburn, 1974 0.88 N60
Seed, 1976 0.8 N60
Tokimatsu and Yoshimi, 1983 0.8 N60
Liao and Whitman, 1986 0.83 N60
Skempton, 1986 0.82 N60
Canadian Foundation Engineering 0.87 4th Edition N60

Manual, 2006
Table 20 : Relative Density (Dr) of Sands.

Source Relative Density (%) Comments Ref# Var.
Gibbs and Holtz, 1957 59.8 Linear Interpolation N60
Meyerhof, 1957 54
Yoshida et al., 1988 48 with Co=25, C1=0.12, C2=0.46 1 N60
Idriss and Boulanger, 2003 52.2 19 N1(60)
Skempton, 1986 47.7 Fine sands 42 N1(60)
Skempton, 1986 43.9 Coarse sands 42 N1(60)
Cubrinovski and Ishihara, 1999 56.7 All sands 42 N1(60)
Cubrinovski and Ishihara, 1999 49.5 Clean sands 42 N1(60)
Cubrinovski and Ishihara, 1999 69.4 Silty sands 42 N1(60)

Table 21 : Bearing Capacity of Footings on Sands (qa).
Source Allowable Bearing Comments Ref# Var.
Capacity qa (kPa)
Burland and Burbidge, 1985 662.77 T=2.23, based on 25 mm allowable settlement 2 N60(ave)
Terzaghi 247.57 Ng from Brinch and Hansen 1970, Nq from Bowles 1996, Fi from
Hatanaka and Uchida, 1996
Meyerhof, 1976 390
Parry, 1977 490.91 in cohesionless soils (valid for Df<B)
Peck et al., 1974 132.71 in cohesionless soils
Table 22 : Settlement of Footing on Sands (S).

Source Settlement (cm) Comments Ref# Var.
modified Meyerhof, 1965 0.36 revised method after Meyerhof, 1956 N60ave
modified Meyerhof (based on - for sands, B>1.2 m N60ave

Terzaghi and Peck)
Terzaghi and Peck, 1967 0.61 N60ave
Peck and Bazaraa, 1969 0.2 N60ave
Peck, Hanson and Thornburn, 1974 2.34 valid for B>0.9 m N60ave
Burland and Burbidge, 1985 0.28 for normally consolidates sands N60ave
Burland and Burbidge, 1985 0.03 for over consolidates sands N60ave
Duncan and Buchignani, 1976 0.65 modified from Meyerhof 1965, for 1 year time effect N60ave
Alpan, 1964 1.53 N1(60)
Anagnostropoulos et al., 1991 0.28 database of 150 cases N60ave

Table 23 : Becker Hammer Test (BPT).
Source Equivalent BPT Comments Ref# Var.
(Nb30)
Harder and Seed, 1986 15 does not consider friction of casing 15 N60
Alex Sy and Campanella, 1994 36 Rs = 0 kN 15,18 N60
Table 24 : Liquefaction (CRR).

Source Cyclic Stress Ratio Comments Ref# Var.
(CSR)
University of California, Davis 0.14 based on on-going works 19 N1(60)
Chinese Code 0.2 uses 0.833*N1(60) N1(60)
Kokusho 0.23 uses 0.833*N1(60) N1(60)
Seed 0.24 uses 0.833*N1(60) N1(60)
Shibata 0.25 uses 0.833*N1(60) N1(60)
Tokimatsu 0.22 uses 0.833*N1(60) N1(60)
NCEER 1997 Workshop 0.14 for clean sand N1(60)
Table 25 : Consistency.
Source Consistency Comments Ref# Var.
Meyerhof, 1965 Stiff for fine-grained soils N60
Meyerhof, 1965 Medium for coarse-grained soils N60

Table 26 : Friction Angle of Sands.
Source Internal Friction Comments Ref# Var.
Angle (deg)
Peck et al., 1953 29.1 4 N60
Terzaghi, Peck and Mesri, 1996 35 Fine-grained sands 23,27 N60
Terzaghi, Peck and Mesri, 1996 31.8 Coarse-grained sands 23,27 N60
Hatanaka and Uchida, 1996 34.7 for Sands 2 N1(60)
Hatanaka and Uchida, 1996 35.8 30 N1(60)
Ohsaki et al., 1959 32.3 4 N60
JRA, 1990 30 for N60>5 , Fi<=45 4 N60
Dunham, 1954 38.4 Angular and well-graded soils 4 N60
Dunham, 1954 33.4 Round and well-graded OR Angular and uniform-graded soils 4 N60
Dunham, 1954 28.4 Round and uniform-garded soils 4 N60
Shioi and Fukui, 1954 25.8 in general 1 N70
Shioi and Fukui, 1954 30.2 for roads and bridges 1 N70
Shioi and Fukui, 1954 31.6 for buildings 1 N70
Meyerhof, 1959 35.2 Dr from Yoshida, 1988 N60
Peck, Hanson and Thornburn, 1974 31.7 is not recommended for shallow depths (less than 1 to 2 metres) 12 N1(60)
Kampengsen 36.7 24 N60
Kampengsen 38.3 24 N1(60)
Chonburi 35.4 24 N60
Chonburi 35.7 24 N1(60)
Ayuthaya 36.2 24 N60
Ayuthaya 34.7 24 N1(60)
Wolff, 1989 30.8 an approximation based on Peck et al., 1974 30 N1(60)
Kulhawy and Mayne, 1990 35.4 N60
Moh, Chin, Lin and Woo, 1989 32.7 granular soils in Taipei 33 N1(60)
Halanakar and Uchida, 1996 32.8 25 N1(60)
Duncan, 2004 45 Gravel, Cu>4 45 Dr
Duncan, 2004 38.6 Sand, Cu<6 45 Dr
Duncan, 2004 43.6 Sand, Cu>6 45 Dr

Table 27 : Shear Wave Velocity (Vs).
Source Vs (m/s) Comments Ref# Var.
Kanai et al., 1966 96 for all soils N60
Imai et al., 1975 227 for all soils N60
Imai, 1977 212 Holocene clay N1(60)
Imai, 1977 187 Holocene sand N1(60)
Imai, 1977 237 Pleistocene clay N1(60)
Imai, 1977 218 Pleistocene sand N1(60)
Imai and Yoshimura, 1970 186 for all soils N60
Imai and Yoshimura, 1975 224 from 192 samples N60
Imai and Tonouchi, 1982 176 for gravelly soils N60
Imai and Tonouchi, 1982 207 for all soils N60
Ohta et al., 1972 231 for sands N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978 85 for Holocene clays 34 N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978 91 for Holocene sands 34 N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978 97 for Holocene sands and gravels 34 N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978 123 for Holocene gravels 34 N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978 110 for Pleistocene clays 34 N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978 118 for Pleistocene sands 34 N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978 127 for Pleistocene sands and gravels 34 N60
Ohta and Goto, 1978 160 for Pleistocene gravels 34 N60
JRA, 1980 247 for clays 40 N60
JRA, 1980 197 for sands 40 N60
Ohba and Toriuma, 1970 186 N1(60)
Iyisan 208 13 N60
Tomio Inazaki, 2006 254 Public Works Research Institute of Japan 36 N60
Baziar, Fallah, Razeghi and 413 for all soils in Iran (function of depth) N1(60)
Khorasani
Okamota et1998
al., 1989 267 Pleistocene sand N1(60)
Tamura and Yamazaki, 2002 246 function of depth N1(60)
Ulugergerli and Uyanik, 2004 ~ 63 to 469 Clay, slit and gravel in western Turkey 31 N60
Jafari, Shafiee and Razmkhak, 195 Clayey soils in Tehran (uses N60) 35 N60
2002
Jafari, Shafiee and Razmkhak, 177 Silty soils in Tehran (uses N60) 35 N60
2002
Jafari, Shafiee and Razmkhak, 190 Fine-grained soils in Tehran (uses N60) 35 N60
2002
Jafari et al., 1997 220 for all soils N60
Yokota et al., 1991 251 for all soils N60
Lee, 1990 333 for clays N60
Lee, 1990 252 for silts N60
Lee, 1990 215 for sands N60
Sykora and Stokoe, 1983 219 for coarse-grained soils N60
Seed et al., 1983 217 for sands N60
Seed and Idriss, 1981 236 for all soils N60
Shibata, 1970 124 for sands N60
Ohsaki and Iwazaki, 1973 211 for coarse-grained soils N60
Ohsaki and Iwazaki, 1973 236 for all soils N60
Anbazhagan and Sitharam, 2008 214 based on 58 sites in Banglore 43 N1(60)
Table 28 : Shear Modulus (Gmax).
Reference Shear Modulus Comments Ref# Var.
Gmax (MPa)
Imai and Tonouchi, 1982 173 37 N1(60)
Seed, Idriss and Arango, 1983 98 N60
Anbazhagan, Sitharam and Diryac, 66 data gathered from Turkey 37 N1(60)

2007
Wroth et al., 1979 105 based on Ohsaki and Iwasaki, 1973 44 N60
Ohsaki and Iwasaki, 1973 97 38 N60
Seed et al., 1986 124 using Japanese data 38 N1(60)
Seed et al., 1986 103 46 N60
Randolph, 1981 15 is conservative 44 N60
Table 29 : Bearing Capacity of Piles.

Source Unit Ultimate Bearing Comments Ref# Var.
of Pile (kPa)
GEO, 1996 and Yau 2000 16 fs for bored piles in saprolites 10 N60
Meyerhof, 1976 22 fs for small displacement piles (bored) 28 N60
Meyerhof, 1976 45 fs for large displacement piles (driven) 28 N60
Yves Robert, 1997 28 fs in granular soil 28 N60
Quiros and Reese, 1977 56 fs for drilled piles 46 N60
Reese and Wright, 1977 42 fs for drilled piles 46 N60
Reese and O'Neill, 1988 192 fs for drilled piles (beta method, function of depth) 46 -
Hassan and O'Neill, 1994 192 fs for drilled piles (modified beta method, function of depth) 46 N60
Meyerhof, 1976 1502 qp for small displacement piles (bored) with upper limit cut-off 28 N1(60)
Meyerhof, 1976 5008 qp for large displacement piles (driven) with upper limit cut-off 28 N1(60)
Yves Robert, 1997 1440 qp for bored piles in granular soil 28 N1(60)
Yves Robert, 1997 2379 qp for driven piles in granular soil 28 N1(60)
Reese and O'Neill, 1988 900 qp with upper limit of 4300 KPa in drilled shafts 46 N60
Detta et al., 1980 ~ 2625 to 8750 qp in calcareous sands 39 N60
Reese and Wright, 1977 958 qp for drilled piles 46 N60

Table 30 : Misc..
Source Value Parameter Ref# Var.
Meyerhof, 1965 6 CPT tip resistance (qc), in MPa N60
J. Fred Triggs and Paul D. 25 Wildcat Dynamic Penetrometer blow counts /10cm N60
Simpson, 1990
Stroud, 1989 ~ 133.12 E-6 mv for PI=15%, in 1/kPa N1(60)
Stroud, 1989 ~ 199.68 E-6 mv for PI=50%, in 1/kPa N1(60)
Ohya, 1982 5424 Pressuremeter horizontal modulus (E_PMT) in sands, in kPa N60
Kulhawy and Mayne, 1990 17.3 Saturated unit weight for Sands, in kN/m3 N60
Kulhawy and Mayne, 1990 18.9 Saturated unit weight for Clays, in kN/m3 N60
Ulugergerli and Uyanik, 2004 ~ 16.6 to 19.4 Unit weight for clay, slit and gravel in western Turkey (using N60
average Vs), in kN/m3
Ziaie Moayed and Naeini, 2006 106.1 Modulus of subgrade reaction Ks30 in gravely soils, in MN/m3 29 N1(60)
Mayne and Kemper, 1984 6.2 Over Consolidation Ratio (OCR) for clays N60
Muayed Ismail, 2008 ~ 1.3 E-3 D10 for granular soil near Baghdad N60<35, in mm 32 N60
Schnaid et al., 2004 ~ 55.2 to 124.3 initial stiffness modulus (Go) for un-cemented soils, in MPa 47 N60
Schnaid et al., 2004 ~ 124.3 to 331.5 initial stiffness modulus (Go) for cemented soils, in MPa 47 N60
Sandorni, 1991 20.6 operational stiffness modulus (E) for cemented soils, in MPa 47 N60
APPENDIX E
Sample Sheet for
Long Term Settlement Calculation

Very Stiff Clay
Stiff Clay
Sand
Materials
100.000
Input View
Very Stiff Clay

VEHICLE LOAD
EMBANKMENT LOAD 1
Stiff Clay
Sand
2
1
0.000
MSettle 7.3 : RoadWidth12.0m.sli
date
P.O. Box 69 Phone +31 15 269 35 00
2600 AB Delft Fax +31 15 261 08 21 30/10/2009
PGS Power Plant Nongsaeng
Road width 12.0 m.. Settlement Prediction
Height 5.0 m. Annex
Height 5.0 m.
Time-History
105.921730
105.921725
Loading [kPa]
105.921720
2600 AB Delft
P.O. Box 69
105.921715
1 10 100 1000 10000

Time [days]
Fax
Phone
0.000000
0.200000
+31 15 261 08 21
+31 15 269 35 00
Settlement [m]
0.400000
0.600000
0.800000
Annex
30/10/2009
1.000000
date
1 10 100 1000 10000
Vertical 2 (X = 50.000 m; Z = 0.000 m) Depth = 0.000 (-) [m]

Method = Isotache with Terzaghi (Natural strain) Settlement after 10000 days = 1.082 [m]
Height 5.0 m.
Time-History
2.633325
2.633320
Loading [kPa]
2.633315
2600 AB Delft
P.O. Box 69
2.633310
1 10 100 1000 10000

Time [days]
Fax
Phone
0.000000
+31 15 261 08 21
+31 15 269 35 00
0.100000
Settlement [m]
0.200000
0.300000
Annex
30/10/2009
0.400000
date
1 10 100 1000 10000
Vertical 1 (X = 34.000 m; Z = 0.000 m) Depth = 0.000 (-) [m]

Method = Isotache with Terzaghi (Natural strain) Settlement after 10000 days = 0.453 [m]
Report for MSettle 7.3
Settlement Calculations
Developed by GeoDelft
Date of report: 30/10/2009
Time of report: 12:58:40
Date of calculation: 30/10/2009
Time of calculation: 12:36:06
Filename: D:\..\00-IPP-PhaseII\01-Soil-Report\SettlementAnalysis\RoadWidth12.0m
Project identification: PGS Power Plant Nongsaeng
Height 5.0 m.
MSettle 7.3
1 Echo of the Input
1.1 Layer Boundaries
Boundary number Co-ordinates [m]
3 -X- 0.000 100.000
3 -Y- 0.000 0.000
2 -X- 0.000 100.000
2 -Y- -6.000 -6.000
1 -X- 0.000 100.000
1 -Y- -16.000 -16.000
0 -X- 0.000 100.000
0 -Y- -18.600 -18.600
1.2 Soil Profiles
Layer Material name PL-line PL-line
number top bottom
3 Stiff Clay 1 1
2 Very Stiff Clay 1 1
1 Sand 1 1
1.3 Soil Properties
Layer Drained Unit weight Vert. consolid.
number Unsaturated Saturated coefficient Cv
[kN/m] [kN/m] [m2/s]
3 No 21.00 21.00 7.31E-08
2 No 22.00 22.00 7.31E-08
1 Yes 21.00 21.00 1.00E-01
Layer POP OCR
number [kN/m] [-]
3 1.30
2 1.30
1 1.30
Layer Direct Secular Secular
number comp. index comp. index comp. rate
a [-] b [-] c [-]
3 1.000E-02 1.000E-01 5.000E-03
2 1.000E-02 1.000E-01 5.000E-03
1 1.000E-02 1.000E-01 5.000E-03
1.4 Verticals
Vertical number X co-ordinates [m]
1-3 0.000 34.000 50.000
Calculation cross section at Z = 0.000 m
30/10/2009 D:\..\SettlementAnalysis\RoadWidth12.0m Page 2
MSettle 7.3
2 Results per Vertical
2.1 Results for Vertical 1 (X = 34.00 m; Z = 0.00 m)
Depth Initial stress Final stress
S-total S-water S-eff. S-total S-water S-eff.
[m] [kN/m] [kN/m] [kN/m] [kN/m] [kN/m] [kN/m]
Layer 3
0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.633 0.000 2.633
-0.10 2.100 0.000 2.100 4.733 0.000 4.733
-0.20 4.200 0.000 4.200 6.837 0.000 6.837
-0.30 6.300 0.000 6.300 8.949 0.000 8.949
-0.40 8.400 0.000 8.400 11.078 0.000 11.078
-0.50 10.500 0.000 10.500 13.229 0.000 13.229
-0.60 12.600 0.981 11.619 15.406 0.981 14.425
-0.70 14.700 1.962 12.738 17.611 1.962 15.649
-0.80 16.800 2.943 13.857 19.841 2.943 16.898
-0.90 18.900 3.924 14.976 22.094 3.924 18.170
-1.00 21.000 4.905 16.095 24.366 4.905 19.461
-2.00 42.000 14.715 27.285 47.597 14.715 32.882
-3.00 63.000 24.525 38.475 71.074 24.525 46.549
-4.00 84.000 34.335 49.665 94.550 34.335 60.215
-5.00 105.000 44.145 60.855 117.955 44.145 73.810
-6.00 126.000 53.955 72.045 141.248 53.955 87.293
Layer 2
-6.00 126.000 53.955 72.045 141.248 53.955 87.293
-7.00 148.000 63.765 84.235 165.402 63.765 101.637
-8.00 170.000 73.575 96.425 189.400 73.575 115.825
-9.00 192.000 83.385 108.615 213.232 83.385 129.847
-10.00 214.000 93.195 120.805 236.897 93.195 143.702
-11.00 236.000 103.005 132.995 260.396 103.005 157.391
-12.00 258.000 112.815 145.185 283.735 112.815 170.920
-13.00 280.000 122.625 157.375 306.922 122.625 184.297
-14.00 302.000 132.435 169.565 329.965 132.435 197.530
-15.00 324.000 142.245 181.755 352.875 142.245 210.630
-16.00 346.000 152.055 193.945 375.660 152.055 223.605
Layer 1
-16.00 346.000 152.055 193.945 375.660 152.055 223.605
-16.70 360.700 158.922 201.778 390.840 158.922 231.918
-17.30 373.300 164.808 208.492 403.810 164.808 239.002
-17.90 385.900 170.694 215.206 416.742 170.694 246.048
-18.60 400.600 177.561 223.039 431.786 177.561 254.225
Layers Type of drainage Time Degree of consolidation [%]
[days] 1 10 100 1000 10000
3-2 undrained, single drainage 81066 0.57 1.78 5.61 17.72 55.86
1-1 drained 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
MSettle 7.3
3 Settlements
3.1 Settlements
Vertical X co-ordinate Surface level Settlement
number [m] [m] [m]
1 34.00 0.00 0.453
2 50.00 0.00 1.082
End of Report
TABLE 1
UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
Sample Sheet
ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD. UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
Project : SIAM ENERGY POWER PLANT

Location. BANGKLA CHACHOENGSAO Depth, m. :3.00-3.50 Init. Area : 25.04 sq.cm.
Boring No. BH-1 Dia.(D), cm. : 5.65 Wet Dens.: 1.538 gm/cc
Sample No. 1 Height(H), cm. : 11.83 Dry Dens. : 1.408 gm/cc
Testing Date : 13/06/52 Soil Weight, gm. : 455.43 Sample Description:

PR constant : 0.2262 kg./div. Water Cont, % 9.24
Strain Rate : 0.05 mm./min. Cap +PR Load, kg. : 0.208 SAMPLE AFTER TEST
Deform Reading : 2.54E-05 mm./div. Tested by VERAPOL
Deform. Load Strain Cor. Axial Dev. Tangent Secant Summary of

0.000 Rdg. % Area Load Stress Modulus Modulus Strength
mm. (div.) sq.cm N kPa MPa MPa Properties
0 0.0 0.000 25.04 0.0 0.0 H/D ratio= 2.09

20 4.0 0.000 25.04 11 4.4 0.00 cor.factor = 0.990
40 5.8 0.001 25.04 15 6.0 371.21 692.88
60 7.8 0.001 25.04 19 7.7 412.45 599.40 qu = 46.0 kPa
80 9.4 0.002 25.04 23 9.1 329.96 532.04 cor. qu = 46.4 kPa
100 10.9 0.002 25.04 26 10.5 309.33 487.50 c = qu/2 = 23.0 kPa
2
120 12.3 0.003 25.04 29 11.7 288.71 454.37 cor. c = 2.37 T/m
140 13.9 0.003 25.04 33 13.1 329.95 436.59
160 15.3 0.003 25.04 36 14.4 288.70 418.11 Tangent Modulus at 50 % qu
180 16.9 0.004 25.04 40 15.8 329.94 408.31 = 230.95 MPa
200 18.4 0.004 25.04 43 17.1 309.32 398.41 Secant Modulus at 50 % qu
250 21.2 0.005 25.04 49 19.6 230.95 364.92 = 364.92 MPa
300 25.7 0.006 25.04 59 23.6 371.17 365.96
350 29.5 0.008 25.04 67 26.9 313.42 358.46
45.0
400 32.9 0.009 25.04 75 30.0 280.42 348.70
450 36.5 0.010 25.04 83 33.1 296.91 342.95
40.0
500 40.0 0.011 25.04 91 36.2 288.66 337.52
550 43.0 0.012 25.05 97 38.90 247.41 329.33 35.0
600 45.0 0.013 25.05 102 40.67 164.92 315.63

DEVIATER STRESS, kPa
30.0
650 47.0 0.014 25.05 106 42.44 164.92 304.03
700 48.7 0.015 25.05 110 43.95 140.17 292.33 25.0
750 50.0 0.016 25.05 113 45.10 107.18 279.99

20.0
800 51.0 0.017 25.05 115 45.98 82.43 267.64
850 51.0 0.018 25.05 115 45.98 -0.05 251.89
15.0
900 51.0 0.019 25.05 115 45.98 -0.05 237.90
950 50.0 0.020 25.05 113 45.10 -82.52 221.03 10.0
1000 49.0 0.021 25.05 111 44.21 -82.52 205.85

5.0
0.0
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025
STRAIN, %



0 0.0 0.000 22.99 0.0 0.0 H/D ratio= 2.23

20 3.6 0.000 22.99 10 4.4 0.00 cor.factor = 0.976
40 5.5 0.001 22.99 14 6.2 435.41 735.56
60 7.2 0.001 22.99 18 7.8 389.57 620.23 qu = 23.1 kPa
80 8.7 0.002 22.99 21 9.3 343.73 551.11 cor. qu = 23.6 kPa
100 10.1 0.002 22.99 24 10.6 320.82 505.05 c = qu/2 = 11.5 kPa
120 11.2 0.003 22.99 27 11.7 252.06 462.88 cor. c = 1.21 T/m2
140 12.0 0.003 22.99 29 12.5 183.31 422.95
180 14.0 0.004 22.99 33 14.4 183.31 379.88 = 320.82 MPa
250 15.9 0.005 22.99 37 16.2 91.65 308.34 = 505.05 MPa
300 17.0 0.006 22.99 40 17.3 100.81 273.75
25.0
350 17.9 0.007 22.99 42 18.2 82.48 246.43
400 18.7 0.008 22.99 44 18.9 73.31 224.79
450 19.0 0.009 22.99 44 19.2 27.48 202.86
500 19.9 0.011 22.99 46 20.1 82.47 190.82 20.0
550 20.5 0.012 22.99 48 20.67 54.97 178.47

600 20.9 0.013 22.99 48 21.05 36.64 166.65
650 21.7 0.014 22.99 50 21.83 73.30 159.47 15.0
700 22.5 0.015 22.99 52 22.60 73.30 153.32

750 22.9 0.016 22.99 53 22.98 36.64 145.54
800 23.0 0.017 22.99 53 23.08 9.14 137.01 10.0
850 23.0 0.018 22.99 53 23.08 -0.02 128.95
900 22.7 0.019 22.99 52 22.79 -27.52 120.26
950 22.0 0.020 22.99 51 22.11 -64.18 110.55
5.0
1000 21.0 0.021 22.99 49 21.15 -91.67 100.44
0.0
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025
STRAIN, %



0 0.0 0.000 29.00 0.0 0.0 H/D ratio= 1.94

20 4.0 0.000 29.00 11 3.8 0.00 cor.factor = 1.008
40 6.0 0.001 29.00 15 5.3 355.75 615.40
60 8.5 0.001 29.00 21 7.2 444.68 558.50 qu = 48.1 kPa
80 10.3 0.002 29.00 25 8.6 320.16 498.91 cor. qu = 47.8 kPa
100 12.8 0.002 29.00 30 10.5 444.67 488.06 c = qu/2 = 24.1 kPa
2
120 14.8 0.003 29.00 35 12.0 355.73 466.01 cor. c = 2.44 T/m
140 16.0 0.003 29.00 38 12.9 213.43 429.93
180 20.6 0.004 29.00 48 16.5 640.31 425.30 = 341.48 MPa
250 28.0 0.005 29.00 64 22.1 341.48 411.51 = 411.51 MPa
300 36.0 0.006 29.00 82 28.2 569.14 437.78
50.0
350 42.0 0.008 29.00 95 32.8 426.84 436.22
400 48.0 0.009 29.00 109 37.4 426.83 435.04
450 50.0 0.010 29.00 113 38.9 142.25 402.51
500 54.0 0.011 29.00 122 42.0 284.53 390.71 40.0
550 58.0 0.012 29.00 131 45.06 284.53 381.06

600 60.0 0.013 29.01 135 46.59 142.24 361.16
650 62.0 0.014 29.01 140 48.12 142.23 344.32 30.0
700 62.0 0.015 29.01 140 48.12 -0.05 319.72

750 61.0 0.016 29.01 137 47.36 -71.19 293.66
800 60.0 0.017 29.01 135 46.59 -71.19 270.86 20.0
10.0
0.0
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02
STRAIN, %
TABLE 2
ATTERBERG LIMIT TEST
Sample Sheet
ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD. ATTERBERG LIMITS TEST
Project. SIAM ENERGY POWER PLANT

Location. BANGKLA CHACHOENGSAO Test No. 1
Boring. No. BH - 1 Tested by. LAMPRAI
Depth. (m.) 1.50-1.95 Check by. PANYA Date. 16/6/2552

Water Content Determination Liquid Limit Wl Plasttic Limit Wp
Container Number B-27 B-28 B-59 B-21 A-67 A-22 A-3 Plasticity index Ip = Wl - Wp
Number of Blows 19 24 32 40
Wt. Wet Soil+Container gm. 40.950 38.860 35.530 30.950 21.560 21.540 19.580 Flow Index If = Slope of Flow Curve
Wt. Dry Soil+Container gm. 35.540 32.260 29.990 26.830 18.890 18.980 16.820
Wt. Water gm. 5.410 6.600 5.540 4.120 2.670 2.560 2.760 Toughness Index It = Ip / If
Wt. Container gm. 24.310 18.360 18.080 17.820 9.350 9.590 6.560
Wt. Dry Siol gm. 11.230 13.900 11.910 9.010 9.540 9.390 10.260
Water Content %. 48.17 47.48 46.52 45.73 27.99 27.26 26.90
Average (%) 47.34 27.38 Activity of Clay A = Ip / (% by wt.<2u)
Plasticity Index (lp) = (WL)-(Wp) = 19.95 (%)
49.00
48.00
Water Content (%)
(Liquid Limit WL)
47.34
47.00
46.00
45.00
10 Number of Blows. 100


Wt. Container gm. 24.210 24.170 18.050 17.710 9.570 9.500 9.450
Wt. Dry Siol gm. 15.000 11.580 12.140 10.280 9.310 10.020 9.660
Water Content %. 45.47 44.47 43.33 42.32 22.56 23.55 23.71
46.00
45.00
Water Content (%)
(Liquid Limit WL)
44.27
44.00
43.00
42.00


Wt. Container gm. 24.480 24.300 18.030 17.860 9.330 6.500 6.490
Wt. Dry Siol gm. 13.770 11.220 11.920 10.520 10.120 9.570 9.670
Water Content %. 47.20 46.26 45.05 44.30 20.16 21.94 21.92
48.00
47.00
Water Content (%)
(Liquid Limit WL)
46.08
46.00
45.00
44.00


Wt. Container gm. 24.160 23.680 18.730 17.670 6.510 6.540 9.430
Wt. Dry Siol gm. 12.580 9.890 11.560 10.920 10.040 9.860 8.920
Water Content %. 56.76 55.51 54.15 53.02 27.59 28.19 28.81
57.00
56.00
Water Content (%)
(Liquid Limit WL)
55.34
55.00
54.00
53.00


Wt. Container gm. 24.110 18.080 17.990 17.940 6.480 6.430 6.450
Wt. Dry Siol gm. 10.320 11.610 10.480 10.300 10.110 9.850 11.000
Water Content %. 55.62 54.78 53.72 52.91 20.18 21.62 20.18
56.00
55.00
Water Content (%)
(Liquid Limit WL)
54.61
54.00
53.00
52.00
TABLE 3
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Sample Sheet
ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD. SIEVE ANALYSIS (ASTM D-422)

Sample : BH-1 Tested by: Lamprai Sample : BH-1 Tested by: Lamprai
Location : Bangkla Chachoengsao Date of Test: 11-6-52 Location : Bangkla Chachoengsao Date of Test: 11-6-52
Depth,m : 1.50-1.95 Water Content,% : Depth,m : 3.00-8.00 Water Content,% :
Before Washing(Sieve No.200) After Washed and Oven Dry Before Washing(Sieve No.200) After Washed and Oven Dry
Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm 179.98 Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm 68.59 Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm 252.33 Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm 96.57
Wt.Container,gm 64.31 Wt.Container,gm 64.31 Wt.Container,gm 58.11 Wt.Container,gm 58.11
Wt.Dry Soil,gm 115.67 Wt.Dry Soil,gm 4.28 Wt.Dry Soil,gm 194.22 Wt.Dry Soil,gm 38.46
Wt.Dry Soil,gm 115.67 Washing Loss,gm 111.39 Wt.Dry Soil,gm 194.22 Washing Loss,gm 155.76
Sieve Sieve Wt.Soil Adj.Wt. Wt.Soil Cumulative Percent Sieve Sieve Wt.Soil Adj.Wt. Wt.Soil Cumulative Percent
Size Oprning Retain Soil Ret. Retain Soil Ret. Finer Size Opening Retain Soil Ret. Retain Soil Ret. Finer
mm. gm gm % % % mm. gm gm % % %
1 in. 25.40 1 in. 25.40
3/4 in. 19.05 3/4 in. 19.05
1/2 in. 12.70 1/2 in. 12.70
3/8 in. 9.53 3/8 in. 9.53
# 4 4.75 # 4 4.75 0.31 0.31 0.16 0.16 99.84
# 10 2.00 # 10 2.00 2.55 2.56 1.32 1.48 98.52
# 20 0.85 0.17 0.17 0.14 0.14 99.86 # 20 0.85 2.97 2.98 1.53 3.01 96.99
# 40 0.42 0.75 0.74 0.64 0.78 99.22 # 40 0.42 2.93 2.94 1.51 4.52 95.48
#100 0.15 2.30 2.27 1.96 2.74 97.26 #100 0.15 21.52 21.57 11.11 15.63 84.37
#200 0.075 1.10 1.08 0.94 3.68 96.32 #200 0.075 7.97 7.99 4.11 19.74 80.26
Pan 0.02 0.02 96.32 100.00 Pan 0.12 0.12 80.26 100.00
Total 4.34 4.28 Weighted Error,% -0.05 Total 38.37 38.46 Weighted Error,% 0.05
Sample : BH-1 Tested by: Lamprai Sample : BH-1 Tested by: Lamprai
Location : Bangkla Chachoengsao Date of Test: 11-6-52 Location : Bangkla Chachoengsao Date of Test: 11-6-52
Depth,m : 8.00-12.45 Water Content,% : Depth,m : 12.45-15.45 Water Content,% :
Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm 445.71 Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm 170.02 Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm 313.06 Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm 79.44
Wt.Container,gm 65.45 Wt.Container,gm 65.45 Wt.Container,gm 67.37 Wt.Container,gm 67.37
Wt.Dry Soil,gm 380.26 Wt.Dry Soil,gm 104.57 Wt.Dry Soil,gm 245.69 Wt.Dry Soil,gm 12.07
Wt.Dry Soil,gm 380.26 Washing Loss,gm 275.69 Wt.Dry Soil,gm 245.69 Washing Loss,gm 233.62
Size Opening Retain Soil Ret. Retain Soil Ret. Finer Size Opening Retain Soil Ret. Retain Soil Ret. Finer
mm. gm gm % % % mm. gm gm % % %
1 in. 25.40 1 in. 25.40
3/4 in. 19.05 3/4 in. 19.05
1/2 in. 12.70 1/2 in. 12.70
3/8 in. 9.53 3/8 in. 9.53
# 4 4.75 17.87 17.81 4.68 4.68 95.32 # 4 4.75 0.39 0.38 0.15 0.15 99.85
# 10 2.00 25.11 25.02 6.58 11.26 88.74 # 10 2.00 1.46 1.42 0.58 0.73 99.27
# 20 0.85 12.50 12.46 3.28 14.54 85.46 # 20 0.85 3.84 3.75 1.53 2.26 97.74
# 40 0.42 8.16 8.13 2.14 16.68 83.32 # 40 0.42 2.50 2.44 0.99 3.25 96.75
#100 0.15 16.03 15.97 4.20 20.88 79.12 #100 0.15 2.44 2.38 0.97 4.22 95.78
#200 0.075 25.12 25.03 6.58 27.46 72.54 #200 0.075 1.71 1.67 0.68 4.90 95.10
Pan 0.14 0.14 72.54 100.00 Pan 0.02 0.02 95.10 100.00
Total 104.93 104.57 Weighted Error,% -0.09 Total 12.36 12.06 Weighted Error,% -0.12
1" 3/4" 1/2"3/8" 4# 10# 20# 40# 100# 200#

100
90
80
70
% Passing by Weight
60 Sample No.1
50
Sample No.2
40
30 Sample No.3
20
Sample No.4
10
0
100.00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01
Diameter in Milimeter
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE

ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD. SIEVE ANALYSIS (ASTM D-422)

Sample : BH-1 Tested by: Lamprai Sample : Tested by:
Location : Bangkla Chachoengsao Date of Test: 11-6-52 Location : Date of Test:
Depth,m : 15.45-21.45 Water Content,% : Depth,m : Water Content,% :
Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm 307.40 Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm 147.04 Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm
Wt.Container,gm 68.29 Wt.Container,gm 68.29 Wt.Container,gm Wt.Container,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm 239.11 Wt.Dry Soil,gm 78.75 Wt.Dry Soil,gm Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm 239.11 Washing Loss,gm 160.36 Wt.Dry Soil,gm Washing Loss,gm
Size Oprning Retain Soil Ret. Retain Soil Ret. Finer Size Opening Retain Soil Ret. Retain Soil Ret. Finer
mm. gm gm % % % mm. gm gm % % %
1 in. 25.40 1 in. 25.40
3/4 in. 19.05 3/4 in. 19.05
1/2 in. 12.70 1/2 in. 12.70
3/8 in. 9.53 3/8 in. 9.53
# 4 4.75 6.73 6.73 2.81 2.81 97.19 # 4 4.75
# 10 2.00 18.01 18.01 7.53 10.35 89.65 # 10 2.00
# 20 0.85 18.21 18.21 7.61 17.96 82.04 # 20 0.85
# 40 0.42 10.64 10.64 4.45 22.41 77.59 # 40 0.42
#100 0.15 14.88 14.88 6.22 28.63 71.37 #100 0.15
#200 0.075 10.25 10.25 4.29 32.92 67.08 #200 0.075
Pan 0.04 0.04 67.08 100.00 Pan
Total 78.76 78.75 Weighted Error,% 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Weighted Error,% #DIV/0!
Sample : Tested by: Sample : Tested by:

Location : Date of Test: Location : Date of Test:
Depth,m : Water Content,% : Depth,m : Water Content,% :
Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm Wt.Cont.+Dry Soil,gm
Wt.Container,gm Wt.Container,gm Wt.Container,gm Wt.Container,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm Wt.Dry Soil,gm Wt.Dry Soil,gm Wt.Dry Soil,gm
Wt.Dry Soil,gm Washing Loss,gm Wt.Dry Soil,gm Washing Loss,gm
Size Opening Retain Soil Ret. Retain Soil Ret. Finer Size Opening Retain Soil Ret. Retain Soil Ret. Finer
mm. gm gm % % % mm. gm gm % % %
1 in. 25.40 1 in. 25.40
3/4 in. 19.05 3/4 in. 19.05
1/2 in. 12.70 1/2 in. 12.70
3/8 in. 9.53 3/8 in. 9.53
# 4 4.75 # 4 4.75
# 10 2.00 # 10 2.00
# 20 0.85 # 20 0.85
# 40 0.42 # 40 0.42
#100 0.15 #100 0.15
#200 0.075 #200 0.075
Pan Pan
Total 0.00 0.00 Weighted Error,% #DIV/0! Total 0.00 0.00 Weighted Error,% #DIV/0!
1" 3/4" 1/2"3/8" 4# 10# 20# 40# 100# 200#

100
90
80
70
% Passing by Weight
60 Sample No.1
50
Sample No.2
40
30 Sample No.3
20
Sample No.4
10
0
100.00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01
Diameter in Milimeter
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE

TABLE 4
UNIT WEIGHT TEST

Sample Sheet
ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD. UNIT WEIGHT
Project : SIAM ENERGY POWER PLANT Job No.: Date: 16 / 06 / 52
Location : BANGKLA CHACHOENGSAO Tested by: SIRIPORN Checked by:
Boring No Depth Wt. of soil Height. Diameter Volume. Unit Weight

(m) (gm) (cm) (cm) (cm3) (gm/cm3)
BH. - 1 1.50-1.95 151.56 7.76 3.67 82.10 1.85
3.00-3.50 455.43 11.83 5.65 296.64 1.54
6.00-6.50 453.36 12.06 5.41 277.26 1.64
7.50-8.00 663.01 11.81 6.08 342.93 1.93
9.00-9.45 149.60 7.57 3.56 75.36 1.99
10.50-10.95 169.23 7.68 3.76 85.29 1.98
12.00-12.45 164.78 7.57 3.76 84.07 1.96
13.50-13.95 157.23 7.34 3.77 81.95 1.92
15.00-15.45 157.18 7.45 3.77 83.17 1.89
18.00-18.45 160.85 7.57 3.77 84.51 1.90
BH. - 2 3.00-3.50 515.23 11.92 5.47 280.15 1.84

4.50-5.00 455.03 11.92 5.21 254.15 1.79
6.00-6.50 480.98 11.97 5.51 285.46 1.68
7.50-8.00 439.19 11.97 5.49 283.39 1.55
9.00-9.50 538.22 12.08 5.69 307.21 1.75
10.50-10.95 158.25 7.63 3.64 79.41 1.99
12.00-12.45 160.74 7.83 3.71 84.66 1.90
UNIT WEIGHT = Wt. of soil.
Volme.
TABLE 5
WATER CONTENT TEST

Sample Sheet
ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD. WATER CONTENT
PROJECT : SIAM ENERGY POWER PLANT LOCATION : BANGKLA CHACHOENGSAO

JOB No. DATE : 11/ 06 / 52
TESTED BY : LAMPRAI CHECKED BY : PANYA
Sample Depth. Container Wt. Of Cont. Wt. Of Cont.+ Wt. Of Cont.+ Wt. Of Wt. Water Water
No. (m.) No. (gm.) Wet Soil(gm.) Dry Soil(gm) Dry Soil(gm) (gm) Content %
BH -1 0.00-1.95 E-8 64.31 215.83 179.98 115.67 35.85 30.99
3.00-3.50 C-32 16.82 100.57 68.57 51.75 32.00 61.84
6.00-6.50 C-15 14.14 106.77 72.02 57.88 34.75 60.04
7.50-8.00 C-7 13.30 175.73 135.19 121.89 40.54 33.26
8.00-12.45 E-9 65.45 517.88 445.71 380.26 72.17 18.98
12.45-15.45 E-13 67.37 377.92 313.06 245.69 64.86 26.40
15.45-21.45 E-17 68.29 355.34 307.40 239.11 47.94 20.05
BH -2 3.00-3.50 C-109 19.54 215.94 160.58 141.04 55.36 39.25

4.50-5.00 C-91 16.49 153.42 100.07 83.58 53.35 63.83
6.00-6.50 C-89 19.00 124.34 86.79 67.79 37.55 55.39
7.50-8.00 C-92 21.75 199.90 132.11 110.36 67.79 61.43
9.00-9.50 C-80 18.82 166.73 124.38 105.56 42.35 40.12
9.50-12.45 E-1 68.66 390.28 327.99 259.33 62.29 24.02
12.45-16.95 E-11 64.50 441.10 376.88 312.38 64.22 20.56
BH -3 3.00-3.50 C-18 13.73 254.37 156.88 143.15 97.49 68.10

4.50-5.00 C-61 19.17 323.13 217.20 198.03 105.93 53.49
6.00-6.50 C-68 18.52 317.72 208.84 190.32 108.88 57.21
7.50-8.00 C-105 20.38 268.74 193.34 172.96 75.40 43.59
8.00-10.95 E-7 70.35 379.00 326.87 256.52 52.13 20.32
10.95-18.45 E-19 70.48 675.65 556.63 486.15 119.02 24.48
WATER CONTENT = Wt, of Weter 100

Wt.of Dry Soil
TABLE 6
Consolidation Test
Sample Sheet
CONSOLIDATION TEST (ASTM D 2435) ASTM TESTING CO., LTD.
PROJECT : POWER GENERATION SUPPLY BORING NO. : BH-2R
0.85
SAMPLE NO. :
LOCATION : NONGSAENG SARABURI DEPTH (m) : 01.50-02.00 Cr = 0.058
0.80 Cc = 0.292
TESTED BY : RAWAT K.
Cs = 0.041
DATE : 29/09-02/10/2009 'vm
SOIL DESCRIPTION : STIFF CLAY MADE BY : M. SUKMOL 0.75
Applied Scale Final Cumulative Initial Water Content, Wni 27.62 %
Pressure Load Dial Reading Dial Change Final Water Content, Wnf 22.80 %
Void Ratio, e
0.70

(t/m ) (kg) (0.0001") h, (cm) Initial Void Ratio, e0 0.807
0.00 0.000 0 0.0000 Initial Total Unit Weight, ti 1.92 t/m
0.65
2.50 0.650 40 0.0102 Final Total Unit Weight, tf 2.05 t/m
5.00 1.300 100 0.0254 Specific Gravity, Gs 2.689
10.00 2.600 235 0.0597 Liquid Limit, LL - % 0.60
20.00 5.201 440 0.1118 Plasticity Index, PI - %

40.00 10.401 688 0.1748 Sample Height, H0 2.52 cm 0.55
80.00 20.803 995 0.2527 Sample Area, A 21.401 cm
160.00 41.606 1480 0.3759 Wt.of Dry Sample, Ws 80.25 gm
0.50
40.00 10.401 1360 0.3454 Height of Solid, Hs 1.395 cm
100
Coef. of Consolidation, cv x 10-4

10.00 2.600 1178 0.2992 Effective Overburden Pressure, 'vo 3.36 t/m
2.50 0.650 1072 0.2723 Preconsolidation Pressure, 'vm 33.00 t/m t90 t50
Over Consolidation Ratio, OCR 9.821
(cm2/sec)
Applied Sample Void Void Ratio Ave. Sample Fitting Time Cv (0.0001 cm/sec) Coef. of Permea
10
Pressure Height Height e = Hv/Hs Height t90 t50 0.848 x Ha 0.197 x Ha k x 10-8 (cm/sec)
(t/m2) H, (cm) Hv, (cm) Ha, (cm) (sec) (sec) 4 x t90 4 x t50 t90 t50
0.00 2.5200 1.1255 0.8071
2.50 2.5098 1.1153 0.7998 2.5149 1109 420 12.086 7.417 1.949 1.196
5.00 2.4946 1.1001 0.7889 2.5022 1815 702 7.313 4.393 1.769 1.063
1
10.00 2.4603 1.0658 0.7643 2.4775 1622 558 8.020 5.417 2.183 1.474
10
20.00 2.4082 1.0137 0.7269 2.4343 821 348 15.294 8.386 3.160 1.733
Coef. of Permeability, k x 10-8 (cm/sec)

33.00 2.3452 0.9507 0.6818 2.3767 1325 414 9.036 6.720 1.737 1.292 t90 t50
80.00 2.2673 0.8728 0.6258 2.3063 2018 780 5.587 3.358 0.368 0.221
160.00 2.1441 0.7496 0.5375 2.2057 1270 426 8.124 5.624 0.496 0.344
40.00 2.1746 0.7800 0.5594 2.1593
1
10.00 2.2208 0.8263 0.5925 2.1977
2.50 2.2477 0.8532 0.6118 2.2343
Notes : 1) Hs = Ws / Gw .A 2) Cv = 0.848 Ha / 4t90 3) k = (Cv.e.w) / (1+e0)

0.1
= 0.197 Ha / 4t50 1 10 100 1000
Pressure (t/m2)
FM-GE-05-13 R00 30/05/2005 \\labtest\conso\Lab ConsoBH-2

CONSOLIDATION TEST (ASTM D 2435) ASTM TESTING CO., LTD.
PROJECT : POWER GENERATION SUPPLY BORING NO. : BH-2R TESTED BY : RAWAT K.
SAMPLE NO. : DATE : 29/09-02/10/2009
LOCATION : NONGSAENG SARABURI DEPTH (m) : 01.50-02.00 CHECKED BY : SOMPOL I.
SOIL TYPE : STIFF CLAY DATE : 05/10/2009
MADE BY : M. SUKMOL
WATER CONTENT BEGIN END UNIT WEIGHT BEGIN END APPARATUS

CONTAINER NO. R-5 R-32 A-29 Wt. OF SOIL + RING (gm) 1111.98 COSOLIDOMETER NO. R-2
Wt. OF CONTAINER (gm) 10.57 10.48 24.80 Wt. OF RING (gm) 1008.50 LEVER ARM RATIO 8.23
Wt. OF WET SOIL + CONTAINER (gm) 45.32 54.05 123.35 Wt. OF SOIL (gm) 103.48 98.55 RING NO. R-2
3
Wt. OF DRY SOIL + CONTAINER (gm) 37.75 44.68 105.05 VOLUME OF SOIL (cm ) 53.93 48.10 DIAMETER, D (cm) 5.22
3 2
Wt OF WATER (gm) 7.57 9.37 18.30 TOTAL UNIT Wt., t (t/m ) 1.919 2.049 SAMPLE AREA, A (cm ) 21.401
Wt. OF DRY SOIL, Ws (gm) 27.18 34.20 80.25 AVE. WATER CONTENT (%) 27.62 22.80 SAMPLE HEIGHT, H0 (cm) 2.52
3 3
WATER CONTENT, Wn (%) 27.85 27.40 22.80 DRY UNIT Wt., d (t/m ) 1.503 1.668 VOLUME, V (cm ) 53.930
LIQUID LIMIT, LL = - % SPECIFIC GRAVITY, Gs = 2.689 SOLID HEIGHT, Hs = Ws / (Gs . W . A)

PLASTICITY INDEX, PI = - % = 1.395 cm.
APPLIED SCALE FINAL DIAL CUM. DIAL SAMPLE HEIGHT VOID HEIGHT VOID RATIO AVERAGE FITTING TIME COEF. OF CONSLIDATION
PRESSURE LOAD READING CHANGE H = H0-h Hv = H-Hs e = Hv/ Hs SAMPLE HEIGHT (min) CV, (0.0001 cm2/sec)
(t/m2) (kg) (0.0001 in) h, (cm) (cm) (cm) Hav, (cm) t90 t50 0.848 x Ha2 0.197 x Ha2
4 x t90 4 x t50
0.00 0.000 0 0.0000 2.5200 1.1255 0.8071
2.50 0.650 40 0.0102 2.5098 1.1153 0.7998 2.5149 18.49 7.00 12.086 7.417
5.00 1.300 100 0.0254 2.4946 1.1001 0.7889 2.5022 30.25 11.70 7.313 4.393
10.00 2.600 235 0.0597 2.4603 1.0658 0.7643 2.4775 27.04 9.30 8.020 5.417
20.00 5.201 440 0.1118 2.4082 1.0137 0.7269 2.4343 13.69 5.80 15.294 8.386
40.00 10.401 688 0.1748 2.3452 0.9507 0.6818 2.3767 22.09 6.90 9.036 6.720
80.00 20.803 995 0.2527 2.2673 0.8728 0.6258 2.3063 33.64 13.00 5.587 3.358
160.00 41.606 1480 0.3759 2.1441 0.7496 0.5375 2.2057 21.16 7.10 8.124 5.624
40.00 10.401 1360 0.3454 2.1746 0.7800 0.5594 2.1593
10.00 2.600 1178 0.2992 2.2208 0.8263 0.5925 2.1977
2.50 0.650 1072 0.2723 2.2477 0.8532 0.6118 2.2343
datamain\labtest\conso\Lab ConsoBH-2
TABLE 7
Field permeability test
Sample Sheet
Field Permeability Test
(Constant Head)
PROJECT: SIAM ENERGY POWER PLANT DATE :09 June 2009
Location : Bangkla Chacherngsao
Hole Diameter : 10 cm. Height of Casing Above Ground : 0.50 m.

Hole Depth Casing Length G.W.L Elapsed Water Permebility
No. of Test Depth of Test Time Flow Coefficient
Sample Shee (m.) (m.) (m.) (m.) (sec) (cc) (cm/sec.)
BH-1 10.00 2.00 8.00 1.10 300 110 2.31 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 1.10 300 70 1.47 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 1.10 300 60 1.26 E - 06
BH-2 10.00 2.00 8.00 2.00 300 190 2.56 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 2.00 300 110 1.48 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 2.00 300 90 1.21 E - 06
BH-3 10.00 2.00 8.00 1.50 300 160 2.69 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 1.50 300 100 1.68 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 1.50 300 80 1.34 E - 06
BH-4 10.00 2.00 8.00 1.50 300 180 3.03 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 1.50 300 90 1.51 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 1.50 300 80 1.35 E - 06
BH-5 10.00 2.00 8.00 0.96 300 120 2.77 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 0.96 300 80 1.84 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 0.96 300 50 1.15 E - 06
BH-6 10.00 2.00 8.00 0.96 300 110 2.54 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 0.96 300 70 1.61 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 0.96 300 70 1.61 E - 06
BH-7 10.00 2.00 8.00 1.50 300 285 4.80 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 1.50 300 190 3.20 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 1.50 300 110 1.85 E - 06
BH-8 10.00 2.00 8.00 0.96 300 130 3.00 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 0.96 300 80 1.84 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 0.96 300 70 1.61 E - 06
BH-17 10.00 2.00 8.00 2.00 300 200 4.04 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 2.00 300 110 1.48 E - 06
10.00 2.00 8.00 2.00 300 80 1.08 E - 06
Average 2.09 E- 06
Table 8
Soil Resistivity Test Data
Sample sheet
SOIL RESISTIVITY TEST
ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD.
TEST NO: R-1
Project: Saraburi B Cogeneration Company Limited Position: N E

Location: Nong kae Industrial Estate Saraburi Province Ground Ele.:
Ground Condition: FLAT Date: 11/2/53
Test by: Phisit
Machine: Megger DET4TD2
S/N No.1038
Measured Resistance () Ground Resistivity (-m)

Distance (m)
E-W N-S E-W N-S Average
0.50 60.00 38.20 188.496 120.009 154.252
1.00 14.00 9.00 87.965 56.549 72.257
2.00 5.00 5.00 62.832 62.832 62.832
3.00 4.00 0.45 75.398 8.482 41.940
4.00 4.00 0.34 100.531 8.545 54.538
5.00 3.00 0.30 94.248 9.425 51.836
Average Resistivity 101.578 44.307 72.943
1
Distance (m)
2 E-W
3
4
N-S
5
Average
6
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Ground Resistivity (-m)
Note:
N The apparent soil resistivity is then given by
=2aR (-m)
N where:- = ground resistivity in -m
= 3.1415927
a = electrode spacing in metres
R = measured resistance in at spacing 'a'
R-1
Inspector: Satit
E Project Engineer: Suchat
Project Manager: Weraphol
Project Owner: i-ASTM
Table 9
Down Hole Seismic Test Data
Sample sheet
Summary of Seismic waves travel time and velocityof the site
Saraburi B CoGeneration
Ts Tp Shear wave(Vs) Comp. wave(Vp)

Depth
(m) (Milli Sec.) (Milli Sec.) Velocity(m/s)*1000 Velocity(m/s)*1000
1.0 3.23 1.82 0.31 0.55
2.0 5.41 2.99 0.37 0.67
3.0 7.89 3.95 0.38 0.76
4.0 9.52 4.60 0.42 0.87
5.0 11.36 5.62 0.44 0.89
6.0 10.34 5.56 0.58 1.08
7.0 12.07 5.69 0.58 1.23
8.0 10.81 5.37 0.74 1.49
9.0 11.69 5.81 0.77 1.55
10.0 11.90 6.29 0.84 1.59
11.0 13.92 7.59 0.79 1.45
12.0 13.48 6.82 0.89 1.76
13.0 15.48 7.88 0.84 1.65
14.0 15.91 7.91 0.88 1.77
15.0 14.29 7.50 1.05 2.00
16.0 18.60 9.20 0.86 1.74
17.0 17.71 8.42 0.96 2.02
18.0 18.75 9.23 0.96 1.95
19.0 17.76 9.18 1.07 2.07
19.4 20.00 10.26 0.97 1.89
Saraburi B CoGeneration
Down Hole Seismic Results - BH-3
2,500
2,000
1,500
Shear Wave
Compression Wave
1,000
Velocity(m./sec.)
500
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Depth(m.)
Dynamic Elastic Moduli (BH-03) : SBC
G = Shear modulus, MPa v = Poisson's ratio E = Young modulus, MPa K = Bulk modulus, MPa
2
Depth (m) G = UVs g v = (0.5-VR^2)/(1-VR^2) E = 2G.(1+v) K = UVp2g
1.0
190 0.27 480.85 59.72
2.0
270 0.28 692.25 88.63
3.0
303 0.33 808.26 121.24
4.0
367 0.35 988.39 157.30
5.0
402 0.34 1076.88 164.62
6.0
626 0.30 1623.52 216.95
7.0
668 0.36 1812.06 300.27
8.0
1161 0.34 3102.32 470.61
9.0
1257 0.34 3358.68 509.28
10.0
1422 0.31 3716.51 509.63
11.0
1252 0.29 3226.50 421.65
12.0
1589 0.33 4219.86 621.22
13.0
1408 0.33 3730.73 543.16
14.0
1569 0.34 4192.20 634.81
15.0
2406 0.31 6302.00 872.85
16.0
1614 0.34 4320.02 660.66
17.0
2011 0.35 5446.42 890.40
18.0
2011 0.34 5389.83 829.76
19.0
2451 0.32 6458.94 935.02
19.4
2053 0.32 5425.31 779.48
Table 10
Dutch Cone penetration Test Data
Sample sheet
DUTCH CONE
ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD.
TEST NO. DC-1 (SBC)
Project : Saraburi B Cogeneration Company Limited Coordinate N E ...

Place & location : Nong Kae Industrial Estate Ground ele.,m. .
Ground condition : Flat Area Total depth,m. 15.00
Equipment max. load 5.0 tons : (G)Gauge no. Pressure correction,ksc.
Cone Diameter : 3.70 Sleeve diam. cm., : 3.70 A :(0-16 ksc.) 1.03*(Reading,div. - 0.65)
Cone project area,cm2 10.75 Sleeve height ,cm.: 13.50 B :(0-80 ksc.) 0.88*(Reading,div.) +1.75
Cone weight ,kg. : 1.60 Sleeve area,cm2. : 156.92 C :(0-250 ksc.) 0.96*(Reading,div. -2.0)
Rod weight , kg./rod 1.57 Piston area,cm2 : 11.28 D :(0-400 ksc.) 1.04*(Reading,div.)
Rod (G) Depth Reading,div. Qc Qs Qs/Qc Qf Qb Rod (G) Depth Reading,div. Qc Qs Qs/Qc Qf Qb
no. m. a b t/m2 t/m2 % t/m t/m2 no. m. a b t/m2 t/m2 % t/m t/m2
1 B 0.0 10 18 112.2 5.1 4.5 0.9 37.4 11 C 10.0 65 90 650.7 17.3 2.7 133.5 216.9
1 B 0.2 10 18 112.2 5.1 4.5 1.8 37.4 11 C 10.2 55 100 550.0 31.1 5.6 139.1 183.3
1 B 0.4 12 22 130.6 6.3 4.8 3.0 43.5 11 C 10.4 55 110 550.0 38.0 6.9 145.9 183.3
1 B 0.6 12 22 130.6 6.3 4.8 4.1 43.5 11 C 10.6 60 120 600.3 41.4 6.9 153.3 200.1
2 B 0.8 12 20 132.1 5.1 3.8 5.0 44.0 12 C 10.8 75 125 752.9 34.5 4.6 159.6 251.0
2 B 1.0 10 22 113.6 7.6 6.7 6.4 37.9 12 C 11.0 80 115 803.2 24.2 3.0 163.9 267.7
2 B 1.2 10 20 113.6 6.3 5.6 7.5 37.9 12 C 11.2 75 115 752.9 27.6 3.7 168.9 251.0
2 B 1.4 10 20 113.6 6.3 5.6 8.7 37.9 12 C 11.4 75 115 752.9 27.6 3.7 173.8 251.0
2 B 1.6 6 20 76.7 8.9 11.5 10.2 25.6 12 C 11.6 70 120 702.5 34.5 4.9 180.0 234.2
3 B 1.8 14 30 152.0 10.1 6.7 12.1 50.7 13 C 11.8 70 120 704.0 34.5 4.9 186.3 234.7
3 B 2.0 12 26 133.6 8.9 6.6 13.7 44.5 13 C 12.0 70 115 704.0 31.1 4.4 191.9 234.7
3 B 2.2 14 32 152.0 11.4 7.5 15.7 50.7 13 C 12.2 85 105 855.1 13.8 1.6 194.3 285.0
3 B 2.4 10 24 115.1 8.9 7.7 17.3 38.4 13 C 12.4 70 100 704.0 20.7 2.9 198.1 234.7
3 B 2.6 10 28 115.1 11.4 9.9 19.4 38.4 13 C 12.6 70 100 704.0 20.7 2.9 201.8 234.7
4 B 2.8 10 22 116.5 7.6 6.5 20.7 38.8 14 C 12.8 60 95 604.7 24.2 4.0 206.1 201.6
4 B 3.0 10 20 116.5 6.3 5.4 21.9 38.8 14 C 13.0 60 100 604.7 27.6 4.6 211.1 201.6
4 B 3.2 16 30 171.9 8.9 5.2 23.5 57.3 14 C 13.2 60 105 604.7 31.1 5.1 216.7 201.6
4 B 3.4 22 44 227.3 13.9 6.1 26.0 75.8 14 C 13.4 60 110 604.7 34.5 5.7 222.9 201.6
4 B 3.6 30 50 301.2 12.7 4.2 28.2 100.4 14 C 13.6 75 100 755.8 17.3 2.3 226.0 251.9
5 B 3.8 32 56 321.1 15.2 4.7 31.0 107.0 15 C 13.8 70 105 706.9 24.2 3.4 230.4 235.6
5 B 4.0 34 64 339.6 19.0 5.6 34.4 113.2 15 C 14.0 75 105 757.3 20.7 2.7 234.1 252.4
5 B 4.2 32 64 321.1 20.2 6.3 38.0 107.0 15 C 14.2 70 100 706.9 20.7 2.9 237.8 235.6
5 B 4.4 32 66 321.1 21.5 6.7 41.9 107.0 15 C 14.4 75 95 757.3 13.8 1.8 240.3 252.4
5 B 4.6 32 58 321.1 16.4 5.1 44.9 107.0 15 C 14.6 65 100 656.5 24.2 3.7 244.6 218.8
6 B 4.8 38 60 378.0 13.9 3.7 47.4 126.0 16 C 14.8 70 105 708.4 24.2 3.4 249.0 236.1
6 B 5.0 32 62 322.6 19.0 5.9 50.8 107.5 16 C 15.0 70 110 708.4 27.6 3.9 254.0 236.1
6 B 5.2 36 58 359.5 13.9 3.9 53.3 119.8
6 B 5.4 36 60 359.5 15.2 4.2 56.0 119.8 -------------------------------------
6 B 5.6 34 56 341.1 13.9 4.1 58.5 113.7 Ended of testing at 15.00 meters depth.
7 B 5.8 36 58 361.0 13.9 3.9 61.0 120.3
7 B 6.0 36 60 361.0 15.2 4.2 63.8 120.3
7 B 6.2 42 76 416.4 21.5 5.2 67.6 138.8
7 C 6.4 60 70 594.5 6.9 1.2 68.9 198.2
7 C 6.6 55 90 544.1 24.2 4.4 73.2 181.4
8 C 6.8 60 85 595.9 17.3 2.9 76.3 198.6
8 C 7.0 60 85 595.9 17.3 2.9 79.4 198.6
8 C 7.2 65 105 646.3 27.6 4.3 84.4 215.4
8 C 7.4 70 100 696.7 20.7 3.0 88.1 232.2
8 C 7.6 60 85 595.9 17.3 2.9 91.2 198.6
9 C 7.8 60 90 597.4 20.7 3.5 95.0 199.1
9 C 8.0 70 110 698.1 27.6 4.0 99.9 232.7
9 C 8.2 65 90 647.8 17.3 2.7 103.0 215.9
9 C 8.4 75 105 748.5 20.7 2.8 106.8 249.5
9 C 8.6 75 105 748.5 20.7 2.8 110.5 249.5
10 C 8.8 65 95 649.2 20.7 3.2 114.2 216.4
10 C 9.0 75 100 750.0 17.3 2.3 117.3 250.0
10 C 9.2 60 90 598.9 20.7 3.5 121.0 199.6
10 C 9.4 65 90 649.2 17.3 2.7 124.2 216.4
10 C 9.6 60 85 598.9 17.3 2.9 127.3 199.6
11 C 9.8 65 90 650.7 17.3 2.7 130.4 216.9
11 C 10.0 65 90 650.7 17.3 2.7 133.5 216.9
Test date 17/2/2010 Test by: Pisit Calculated by : Nontasate
Checked by : W.Pramot
Qf = L*f*Qs ; where : Qb=*Qc ; where Qb = Ultimate pile tip bearing capacity,(t/m2)
Qf = Ultimate pile shaft friction,(t/m) = Cone resistance factor, use 1/3
L = Embedded pile length,(m) Qc = Local cone resistance,(t/m2)
f = Adhesion factor,use 0.9 for all cases =((a*(gauge correction))+(no.rod)*(rod weight))/(cone project area)
Qs = Local cone shaft friction,(t/m2) a= Cone resistance reading,(div.)
= (b-a)*(gauge correction)/(Sleeve area) b= a+ Friction reading,(div.) Sheet1..of1..
ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD. DUTCH CONE PENETRATION TEST
PROJECT : Saraburi B Cogeneration Company Limited TEST NO. : DC-1 TESTED BY : Phisit
DEPTH (m) : 15.00 DATE : 17/02/2010
LOCATION : Nong Kae Industrial Estate COORD. N : COMPUTED BY : Nontasate
Saraburi Province E : DATE : 03/03/2010
STA. : Flat Area ELEV. (m) :
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
DEPTH (m)
DEPTH (m)
DEPTH (m)
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
0 1 2 3 4 5 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 5 10 15 20
CONE RESISTANCE LOCAL FRICTION FRICTION RATIO
2 2
Qc ( x1000 t/m ) Qs (t/m ) Qs/Qc (%)
Table 11
Compaction and CBR Test Data
Sample sheet
COMPACTION TEST(ASTM D1140 - 54) ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD.
TEST PIT NO : TESTED BY : GROUP LAB
PROJECT : MEGA BANGNA SHOPPING CENTER DEPTH (m) : DATE : 15-05-53
BANGKOK - THAILAND SOURCE : CHECK BY : SOMCHAI
LOCATION : . DATE : 17-05-53
MATERIAL : EMBANKMENT (CRUSHED ROCK)
TYPE OF TEST STANDARD PROCTOR WEIGHT OF HAMMER (lb.) 5.5
MOLD DIAMETER (cm) 10.100 DROP HEIGHT (in.) 12
MOLD HEIGHT (cm) 12.105 NUMBER OF LAYER 3

3
MOLD VOLUME (cm ) 970.224 NUMBER OF BLOWS/LAYER 25
A. WET & DRY DENSITY

TEST NO. 1 2 3 4 5
MOLD NO. 4 4 4 4
WT. OF MOLD + COMPACTED SOIL (gm) 3767 3905 3926 3868
WT. OF MOLD (gm) 1661 1661 1661 1661
WT. OF COMPACTED SOIL (gm) 2106 2244 2265 2207
WET DENSITY, WD (t/m) 2.171 2.313 2.335 2.275
DRY DENSITY, DD = WD/(1+w/100) (t/m) 2.035 2.131 2.115 2.035
B. WATER CONTENT
CONTAINER NO. A-29 A-30 A-26 A-37
WT. OF CONTAINER (gm) 32.40 43.70 26.50 32.00
WT. OF CONTAINER + WET SOIL (gm) 238.10 188.60 209.30 226.80
WT. OF CONTAINER + DRY SOIL (gm) 225.20 177.20 192.10 206.30
WT. OF WATER, W w (gm) 12.90 11.40 17.20 20.50
WT. OF DRY SOIL, W d (gm) 192.80 133.50 165.60 174.30
WATER CONTENT, w = (W w/Wd)x100 (%) 6.69 8.54 10.39 11.76
C. RESULTS
MAX. DRY DENSITY, MDD (t/m) = 2.137 OPT. MOISTURE CONTENT, OMC (%) = 9.40
2.2
2.1
2.0
Dry Density (t/m)
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Water Content (%)
TP-1 DATAMAIN\LABTEST\COMPACTION\Compaction-Silaporn-15-05-2010.xls
ASTM D 1883 / AASHTO T 193 / .-. 109 (DH-T 109)
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) TEST ASTM TESTING CO.,LTD.
PROJECT : MEGA BANGNA SHOPPING CENTER SAMPLE : TESTED BY : GROUP LAB
BANGKOK-THAILAND DEPTH (m) : CRUSHED ROCK DATE : 19/05/2553
LOCATION : SOURCE : INPUT BY :
. . DATE : 20/05/2553
TEST CONDITION : SOAKED MATERIAL : CRUSHED ROCK CHECKED BY :
DATE : 21/05/2553
1. COMPACTION DATA (BEFORE SOAKING) TEST NO. 1 TEST NO. 2 TEST NO. 3
COMPACTION TYPE(MODIFIED OR STANDARD) T-99 T-99 T-99
NO. OF LAYER 5 5 5
NO. OF BLOWS / LAYER 12 25 56
DIAMETER OF MOLD, D (cm) 15.21 15.13 15.16
HEIGHT OF SAMPLE, H (cm) 17.82 17.81 17.80
WT. OF SAMPLE, W1 (kg) 4.429 4.849 5.210
VOLUME OF SAMPLE, V (m) 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022
WET DENSITY, t = W1 / V (t/m) 2.013 2.204 2.368
Optimum Water Content(From Compaction test) (%) 9.40 9.40 9.40
DRY DENSITY, d = t / (1+ w/100) (t/m) 1.840 2.015 2.165
2. WATER ABSORPTION (AFTER SOAKING)

WATER CONTENT w (%) 9.82 9.51 9.45
WT. OF SAMPLE, W2 (kg) 4.540 4.915 5.240
% ABSORPTION, {(W 2-W 1) / W 1} * 100 (%) 2.51 1.36 0.58
3. SWELLING MEASUREMENT
DATE TIME ELAPSED TIME GAGE RDG. % SWELL GAGE RDG. % SWELL GAGE RDG. % SWELL
(hrs) (div) (div) (div)
15/05/2553 09.40 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
16/05/2553 09.40 24 1 0.009 0 0.004 0 0.001
18/05/2553 09.40 24 1 0.010 0 0.004 0 0.001
19/05/2553 09.40 24 1 0.010 0 0.004 0 0.001
20/05/2553 09.40 24 1 0.010 0 0.004 0 0.001
GAGE ACCURACY (in./div) = 0.001 SURCHARGE (lbs) = 10
4. PENETRATION TEST
PENETRATION LOAD, R PRESSURE LOAD, R PRESSURE LOAD, R PRESSURE
(in) 12Blows(div) (psi) 25Blows(div) (psi) 56Blows(div) (psi)
0.000 0 0 0
0.025 120 17.52 390 109.04 450 129.38
0.050 150 27.69 490 142.94 570 170.06
0.075 230 54.81 610 183.62 810 251.41
0.100 310 81.92 680 207.35 1090 346.33
0.200 380 105.65 730 224.30 1570 509.04
0.300 450 129.38 1000 315.82 1990 651.41
0.400 590 176.84 1190 380.23 2300 756.50
0.500 770 237.86 1400 451.41 2900 959.88
PROVING RING NO. = PR-5 PISTON DIA. (in) = 1.967
LOAD (lbs) = 1.0305R - 70.404 (R = Guage Reading in division, 0.0001 in/div) PISTON AREA (sq.in) = 3.040
DATAMAIN\LABTEST\LAB CBR\CBR-Silaporn-19-02-2010.xls
DEPTH (m) : CRUSHED ROCK DATE : 19/05/2553

. . DATE : 20/05/2553

CRUSHED ROCK DATE : 21/05/2553
% CBR
TEST NO. 1 2 3
TEST CONDITION SOAKED SOAKED SOAKED
PENETRATION (in) 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2
PISTON PRESSURE, A (psi) 81.92 105.65 207.35 224.30 346.33 509.04
STANDARD UNIT LOAD,B (psi) 1,000 1,500 1,000 1,500 1,000 1,500
% CBR = ( A/B )x100 8.19 7.04 20.73 14.95 34.63 33.94
1000
12 BLOWS/LAYER
900 25 BLOWS/LAYER
56 BLOWS/LAYER
800
700
PISTON PRESSURE (psi)
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
PENETRATION (in)
DEPTH (m) : CRUSHED ROCK DATE : 19/05/2553
DATE : 20/05/2553
DATE : 21/05/2553
TEST NO 1 2 3
DRY DENSITY t/m3 1.840 2.015 2.165
% CBR (SOAKED) 8.19 20.73 34.63
COMPACTION METHOD T-99 MAX. DRY DENSITY (MDD) 2.137 t/m3
AT 95% MDD, DRY DENSITY 2.030 t/m3 CBR 22.30 %
2.50
2.45
2.40
2.35
2.30
2.25
2.20
2.15
2.10
2.05
DRY DENSITY (t/m)
2.00
1.95
1.90
1.85
1.80
1.75
1.70
1.65
1.60
1.55
1.50
1.45
1.40
5.0 15.0 25.0 35.0 45.0
CBR (%)
Table 12
Water Analysis Test Data
Sample sheet
GROUND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS REPORT
Coordination : INFRATECH ASIM CO., LTD.
Sampling Source : Saraburi B Cogeneration Co., Ltd. (Saraburi)
Monitoring Date : February 25, 2010
Monitored by : Health & Envitech Co., Ltd.
Report Date : March 6, 2010
Ref. No. : H.E. 371/2010
STANDARD METHOD OF GROUND WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
PARAMETER SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHOD
pH Grab Sampling, pH Meter

Calcium (Ca) Grab Sampling, Direct Aspiration, Atomic Absorption
Magnesium (Mg) Grab Sampling, Direct Aspiration, Atomic Absorption
Manganese (Mn) Grab Sampling, Direct Aspiration, Atomic Absorption
Chloride (Cl) Grab Sampling, Ion-Selective Electrode
Total Hardness (as CaCO3) Grab Sampling, EDTA Titrimetric
Iron (Fe) Grab Sampling, Direct Aspiration, Atomic Absorption
Potassium (K) Grab Sampling, Direct Aspiration, Atomic Absorption
Sodium (Na) Grab Sampling, Direct Aspiration, Atomic Absorption
Nitrate (NO3) Grab Sampling, Nitrate Electrode Method
Sulfate (SO4) Grab Sampling, Iodometric
Carbon dioxide (CO2) as Carbonate (CO3) Grab Sampling, EDTA Titrimetric
Phosphate (PO4) Grab Sampling, Vanadomolybdophosphoric acid, Colorimetric
Grab Sampling, Molybdosilicate Method, Direct Aspiration, Atomic
Silica (Si)
Absorption
... ...
(Prasart Chiaplaem) (Rung Rittiyan)
Laboratory No. -152--3213 Laboratory No. -152--3214
GROUND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS RESULTS
STARDARD
DETECTED
SOURCE PARAMETER UNIT Suitable Max.
VALUE
allowance allowable
Saraburi B Cogeneation Co., Ltd. pH - 6.7 7.0 8.5 6.5 9.2
Calcium (Ca) mg/l 0.186 - -
Magnesium (Mg) mg/l 2.400 - -
Manganese (Mn) mg/l *2.234 d 0.3 d 0.5
Chloride (Cl) mg/l 42 d 250 d 600
Total Hardness (as CaCO3) mg/l 152 d 300 d 500
Iron (Fe) mg/l *2.421 d 0.5 d 1.0
Potassium (K) mg/l 0.038 - -
Sodium (Na) mg/l 1.502 - -
Nitrate (NO3) mg/l 0.280 d 45 d 45
Sulfate (SO4) mg/l 4.276 d 200 d 250
Carbon dioxide (CO2) as
mg/l 253 - -
Carbonate (CO3)
Phosphate (PO4) mg/l 4.276 - -
Silica (Si) mg/l 35.783 - -
*Over standard limit
Remark
1. Standard: Notification of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment B.E. 2551 (2008), issued under The
Ground Water Act B.E. 2520 (1977), published in the Royal Government Gazette, Vol. 125, Special Part 85 . dated May 21, B.E.
2551 (2008).
2. Test results will be applicable only for the brought samples.
3. Do not copy partial of this analysis report without official approval.
4. Definition
mg/l : milligrams per liter
... ...
(Prasart Chiaplaem) (Rung Rittiyan)
Registered Lab. Controller Managing Director
Laboratory No. -152--3213 Health & Envitech Co., Ltd.
Registered Lab No. -152

Soil Investigation

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Soil Investigation

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Method Statement

PREPARED BY JUNE 2010

Chapter Title Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACK GROUND OF THE PROJECT ....................................................... 3

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................................................... 3

3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND BOUNDARY SURVEY ..3

4.0 LABORATORY TEST ..6

5.0 REPORT ....8

Appendix A Sample of Soil Boring Log data sheet

Table 1 Sample of Unconfined Compression Test data sheet

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACK GROUND OF THE PROJECT

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

Laboratory testing of obtained samples to determine the properties of the subsoil.

Determination of geotechnical parameters required for foundation analyses.

Carrying out engineering analyses for foundation design.

3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION

3.2 Boring and Sampling

3.3 Standard Penetration Testing

3.4 Groundwater Measurement

3.5 Field Permeability Test

3.6 Soil Resistity Test (Provisional)

3.7 Test Pit (Provisional)

3.8 Seismic down hole test (Provisional)

3.9 Dutch Cone Penetration Test (Provisional)

4.0 LABORATORY TESTING

4.1 Unconfined Compression Tests

4.2 Atterberg Limits

4.4 Unit Weight and Water Content Determination

Water content (ASTM D 2216)is determined by oven-drying a moist/wet soil at a constant

4.5 Oedometer Test /Consolidation test (Provisional)

4.6 Compaction Test and CBR Test (Provisional)

4.7 Ground Water Analysis

The Final Report shall include but not limited to:

Results of all of the above mentioned tests.

SOIL BORING LOG

0.80 m. Top soil

ST 1 2.00 m. 1.49 1.01

ST 2 Brown, 1.6 1.3

ST 4 6.50 m. 1.7 0.54

SS 1 Brown, moist, high plasticity, 1.81 9

SS 3 Brown, moist, medium plasticity, 1.96 22

Start date: 8-..-09

SUMMARY OF GENERAL LABORATORY TEST

PROJECT: BORE HOLE NO. BH - 8

Sample No From To Soil Received SU gm./cc. LL PL PI #4 # 10 # 40 # 200 (Blow / Soil Description

- 0.00 1.50 Top Soil

ST - 1 1.50 2.00 88.34 1.01 1.49 97.74 93.07 86.41 75.43

ST - 2 3.00 3.50 61.41 1.30 1.60

ST - 4 6.00 6.50 54.24 0.54 1.70 Sandy Clay (CL,CH).

SS - 4 12.00 12.45 1.85 31

SS - 5 13.50 13.95 1.89 14

SS - 6 15.00 15.45 1.96 16

SS - 8 18.00 18.45 17 trace gravel.

SS - 12 24.00 24.45 1.93 89

END OF BORING AT 24.45 M.

Saraburi A Cogeneration Co.,ltd.

SOIL BEARING CAPACITY VS DEPTH FOR SHALLOW FOUNDATION

Project: Saraburi A Cogeneration Co.,ltd.

Remark: 1) qall = Net allowable soil bearing capacity

(Recommendation for Pile Capacity and length)

Saraburi A Cogeneration Co.,ltd.

Project: Saraburi A Cogeneration Co.,ltd.

Soil Capacity F.S. =2.5(Tons) Pile Structural

Bored Pile Dia.0.35 10.0 44 35 0.3 48