Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Academic and Research Vice-rector

Activities guide and evaluation rubric

1. General description of the course

Faculty or Escuela de Ciencias de la Educacin

Academic Unit
Academic Level Profesional
Academic Field Formacin interdisciplinar bsica comn
Course Name Technology in teaching English as a foreign
language.
Course Code 5510O6 peraca 363
Course Type Select course type Can be yes x No
enabled
Number of Credits 3

2. Description of the activity

Number
Type of the Individua
x Collaborative x of 4
activity: l
weeks
Unit
Moment of
Initial Intermediate x Final
evaluation:
:
Delivery Environment of the
Evaluative score of the
activity: Seguimiento y evaluacin
activity: 100
Deadline of the activity: October
Starting date of the activity:
the 5th, 2017
September the 7th, 2017
Competence to develop: Communicative

Topics to develop:
1. The concept of technology
2. ICTs and education
3. The use of Technology in English Language Teaching and Learning
4. The Advantages of Information Technology in Teaching English
Language.
5. The impact of using technology.
Steps, phases of the learning strategy to develop Step 2:

Task 1. Read the following article and think about a specific population
or institution where the ICTS are needed. Post in the collaborative forum
the identification of that specific need. Example: In San Juanito, where I
live, it is necessary to learn to with the ICTS I think We can solve it.

Badhana, B (2012). Integration of Information and Communication

Technologies in Enhancing Teaching and Learning. India: Jammu.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aa8a/be6087a53d3f4916b7dd39f81ba
debd4735c.pdf

Task 2. Create A Unified Model of Integration of ICT Into Teaching and

Learning Process and present it in a word document of three pages
which contains the questions on who, why how what, where
and when and a graphic that explains how that would work as a whole
model. Remember to follow the sample provided by:

Badhana, B (2012). Integration of Information and Communication

Technologies in Enhancing Teaching and Learning. India: Jammu.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aa8a/be6087a53d3f4916b7dd39f81ba
debd4735c.pdf

Activities to develop

Participation in the forum by sharing Task 1 and 2.

Weighting: 60 points

Five pages Word document that includes the following information:

a. Cover page (names and last names of participants, course info,

tutor name, date).
 b. Unified Model of Integration of ICT Into Teaching and Learning
Process and Graphic Explaining the model.
c. References (APA style).

The evaluator and reviser have to check the final product to make sure
it is complete and then inform the delivery student who will upload the
final product to the link: Step 2 Unit 1 in the Evaluation & Assessment
Environment. It should include all the information as requested. Name
your file as follows:

Collaborative_Task1_GroupNumber.pdf

Weighting: 40 points

Environmen
Colaborativo y Evaluacin.
t for the
developmen
t
Individual:

Participation in the forum by sharing Task 1 and 2.

Products to
deliver by Consider revising vocabulary, spelling and language use
student to make the necessary corrections.

Weighting: 60 points

Collaborative:

The group must deliver a five pages word document

named as follows:

Collaborative_Task1_GroupNumber.pdf

Weighting: 40 points
 General guidelines for the collaborative work

Planning of
activities for
the Describe how the individual and collaborative activities
development can be interlinked in order to explain to the students
of how their work incorporates with others
collaborative
work
Roles to
perform by
the student Choose the role to perform within the group
in the
collaborative
group
Roles and
responsibilit You must rely on the document General curriculum
y for the guidelines at UNAD aspects of collaborative work and
delivery of teaching accompaniment published by VIACI, shown in
products by the table 2
students
Use of
Always cite the references
references
Plagiarism
Students must be aware of severe sanctions in the case
policy
of plagiarism.

4. Evaluation rubric

Evaluation rubric

Collabor
Individual
Activity type: x ative x
Activity
Activity
Unit
Moment of the
Initial Interme x Final
evaluation
diate:
Assessed Performance levels of the
Score
Aspects individual activity
 High Media Low
score score score
The
student
The
participate
student
d in the
participated The
forum on
in the student
Individual and time and
forum once did not
timely gave
or twice participate
participation in meaningfu 10 points
and the in the
the forum l feedback
contribution forum.
about
s were not
their
meaningful.
partners
work.
(up to 10 (up to 5 (up to 0
points) points) points)
The student The
The identified student
student the need did not
identified but he did identify
the need not based it any need
based on on the or did not
the model model write in
Task 1.
provided provided or the
Identification of 20 points
and wrote did not collaborati
the need.
it on time
write it on ve forum.
in the
time in the
collaborati
collaborativ
ve forum
e forum

(up to 20 (up to 10 (up to 0

points) points) points)
Performance levels of the
Assessed collaborative activity
Score
Aspect High Media Low
score score score
Task 2. The The group The
50 points
Developing the group created a group did
 model created a quite not create
well- organized a model.
organized model
model which
which contains
contains some of the
the answers to
answers to the wh
the wh questions
questions and the
and the graphic
graphic that
that explains
explains the model
the model in deep.
in deep.
(Up to 50 (Up to 25 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
The group The
The did a good group did
group job not follow
successfull following the
y followed the instruction
the instructions s to
Activity activity but some complete
socialization and instruction elements the 10 points
group interaction s and were assignmen
interaction omitted, t and there
is group was poor
successful. interaction interaction
is OK. .
(Up to 10 (Up to 5 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
The The group
group presents
Overall
presented their work No group
structure and
a well- with major paper is 10 points
content of the
structured problems in presented.
paper
document mechanics,
with minor spelling
 problems and the
in document
mechanics does not
, spelling include all
and the suggested
document items.
includes
all
suggested
items.
(Up to 10 (Up to 5 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Total score:
Final score
100 points