Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
*
ROYALE HOMES MARKETING
CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. FIDEL P.
ALCANTARA [deceased], substituted by his
heirs, respondent.
_______________
* SECOND DIVISION.
148
149
150
_______________
[1] Insular Life Assurance Co., Ltd. v. National Labor
Relations Commission, 259 Phil. 65, 70-71; 179 SCRA 459,
464 (1989).
151
_______________
[2] Rollo, pp. 3-50.
[3] CA Rollo, pp. 209-229; penned by Associate Justice
Mariflor P. Punzalan-Castillo and concurred in by
Associate Justices Josefina Guevara-Salonga and Franchito
N. Diamante.
[4] Rollo, pp. 241-248; penned by Presiding
Commissioner Gerardo C. Nograles and concurred in by
Commissioners Perlita B. Velasco and Romeo L. Go.
[5] CA Rollo, pp. 288-294.
[6] Id., at pp. 231-256.
[7] Id., at pp. 258-275.
[8] See Contract dated January 24, 2003, id., at p. 36.
152
_______________
[9] Rollo, p. 271.
[10] See [Alcantaras] Position Paper, id., at pp. 106-110.
153
154
_______________
[12] Id., at pp. 218-219.
155
_______________
[13] Id., at pp. 241-248.
[14] Id., at pp. 247-248.
[15] See Motion for Reconsideration, id., at pp. 249-251.
[16] Id., at pp. 260-261.
[17] CA Rollo, pp. 3-13.
156
157
A.
WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS HAS
DECIDED THE INSTANT CASE NOT IN ACCORD
WITH LAW AND APPLICABLE DECISIONS OF
THE SUPREME COURT WHEN IT REVERSED
THE RULING OF THE NLRC DISMISSING THE
COMPLAINT OF RESPONDENT FOR LACK OF
JURISDICTION AND CONSEQUENTLY, IN
FINDING THAT RESPONDENT WAS ILLEGALLY
DISMISSED[.]
B.
WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS
COMMITTED A SERIOUS ERROR OF LAW IN
DISREGARDING THE EN BANC RULING OF
THIS HONORABLE COURT IN THE CASE OF
TONGKO VS. MANULIFE, AND IN BRUSHING
ASIDE THE APPLICABLE RULINGS OF SONZA
VS. ABS-CBN AND CONSULTA VS. CA[.]
_______________
[19] Id., at p. 228.
158
C.
WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS
COMMITTED A SERIOUS ERROR OF LAW IN
DENYING THE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF PETITIONER AND IN
REFUSING TO CORRECT ITSELF[.][23]
_______________
[23] Rollo, p. 376.
159
_______________
[24] Bernarte v. Philippine Basketball Association (PBA), G.R.
160
_______________
[26] Id., at p. 80.
161
162
_______________
[28] CIVIL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Article 1370.
[29] Supra note 24; Sandigan Savings and Loan Bank,
Inc. v. National Labor Relations Commission, 324 Phil.
348, 358; 254 SCRA 126, 133 (1996); Sonza v. ABS-CBN
Broadcasting Corporation, G.R. No. 138051, June 10, 2004,
431 SCRA 583, 594-595.
[30] Id.
[31] Sandigan Savings and Loan Bank, Inc. v. National
Labor Relations Commission, supra.
163
_______________
[32] Cosmopolitan Funeral Homes, Inc. v. Maalat, G.R. No.
164
_______________
[36] Id., at p. 71; p. 465.
165
_______________
[37] Supra note 25 at pp. 86-87.
[38] Javier v. Fly Ace Corporation, G.R. No. 192558,
February 15, 2012, 666 SCRA 382, 397-398.
[39] See Consulta v. Court of Appeals, 493 Phil. 842, 848;
453 SCRA 732, 740 (2005); Sonza v. ABS-CBN
Broadcasting Corporation, supra note 29 at p. 600.
166
_______________
[40]See Chavez v. National Labor Relations Commission,
489 Phil. 444, 457-458; 448 SCRA 478, 491 (2005).
[41] Supra note 24 at p. 759.
[42] Supranote 39.
[43] Id., at p. 852; p. 745.
167
_______________
[44] Supra note 24 at p. 757; Consulta v. Court of
Appeals, supra note 39 at p. 851; p. 743.
168
SO ORDERED.
Carpio (Chairperson), Brion, Perez and
Perlas-Bernabe, JJ., concur.