Sie sind auf Seite 1von 179

Name of the project : Rajhena ISP, Rajhena -6,7,8, Banke

Designed Bed Bed Side Water Wetted Wetted Hydraulic Designed Canal Output Tractive Stress

Roughness
Manning`s
age

Mean Free Canal


tion
Discharge Slope Width Slope Depth Area Perimeter Radius Elevation
Eleva nd

Coef.
Drop Flow
Chain

Grou

Q I B 1V:mH H A P R Velocity Board Depth Canal Water Bank


Bed Surface Top Base side
m m Cu.m/s m/m m/m m m n m Sq.m m m m/s m m m m m N/sq.m N/sq.m Froud No. Reynold`s No Remarks
0+000 75.979 0.975 0.000 0 1.50 1.5 0.025 0.856 2.380 4.588 0.520 0.409 0.50 1.356 76.03 76.88 79.39 1.27 0.97 0.14 212,528.00 Intake from Tengra Khola
0+050 76.089 0.975 0.000 0 1.50 1.5 0.025 0.856 2.380 4.588 0.520 0.409 0.50 1.356 76.01 76.87 79.38 1.27 0.97 0.14 212,528.00
0+100 76.219 0.975 0.000 0 1.50 1.5 0.025 0.856 2.380 4.588 0.520 0.409 0.50 1.356 76.00 76.86 79.53 1.27 0.97 0.14 212,528.00
0+150 76.389 0.975 0.000 0 1.50 1.5 0.025 0.856 2.380 4.588 0.520 0.409 0.50 1.356 75.99 76.84 79.69 1.27 0.97 0.14 212,528.00
0+208 77.439 0.975 0.000 0 1.50 1.5 0.025 0.856 2.380 4.588 0.520 0.409 0.50 1.356 75.97 76.83 79.47 1.27 0.97 0.14 212,528.00
0+210 79.473 0.975 0.000 0 1.50 1.5 0.025 0.856 2.380 4.588 0.520 0.409 0.50 1.356 75.97 76.83 79.47 1.27 0.97 0.14 212,528.00
0+220 77.600 0.975 0.000 0 1.50 1.5 0.025 0.856 2.380 4.588 0.520 0.409 0.50 1.356 75.97 76.83 79.67 1.27 0.97 0.14 212,528.00
0+227 77.065 0.975 0.000 0 1.50 0 0.016 1.121 1.680 3.742 0.449 0.580 0.50 1.621 75.97 76.83 79.67 1.10 0.84 0.17 260,530.00 Concrete Rectangular Section
0+300 76.983 0.975 0.000 0 1.50 0 0.016 1.121 1.680 3.742 0.449 0.580 0.50 1.621 75.95 76.81 79.65 1.10 0.84 0.17 260,530.00 Concrete Rectangular Section
0+350 76.975 0.975 0.000 0 1.50 0 0.016 1.121 1.680 3.742 0.449 0.580 0.50 1.621 75.94 76.79 79.64 1.10 0.84 0.17 260,530.00 Concrete Rectangular Section
0+400 76.934 0.975 0.000 0 1.50 1.5 0.025 0.856 2.380 4.588 0.520 0.409 0.50 1.356 75.93 76.78 79.63 1.27 0.97 0.14 212,528.00
0+450 77.035 0.975 0.000 0 1.50 1.5 0.025 0.856 2.380 4.588 0.520 0.409 0.50 1.356 75.91 76.77 79.61 1.27 0.97 0.14 212,528.00
0+500 76.915 0.975 0.000 0 1.50 1.5 0.025 0.856 2.380 4.588 0.520 0.409 0.50 1.356 75.90 76.76 79.60 1.27 0.97 0.14 212,528.00
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP, Rajhena -6,7,8, Banke

Calculation of 80% Reliable Rainfall


Station :- Dharan Briti Lat 26.783
Index No :- 1323 Long 87.283
Elev. 277
District :- Sunsari Zone Koshi

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Monthly Distribution
19.00 20.00 11.00 23.00 46.00 216.00 462.00 327.00 266.00 72.00 6.00 14.00

Calculation of half monthly 80% reliable rainfall


Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
14.00 19.00 20.00 11.00 23.00 46.00 216.00 462.00 327.00 266.00 72.00
Half Month 8.9 9.6 9.9 8.9 6.6 7.0 10.0 14.4 20.1 44.3 86.8 138.8 200.3 214.1 180.4 155.9 140.6 108.8 60.3
Monthly 18.5 18.5 18.8 18.8 13.6 13.6 24.4 24.4 64.4 64.4 225.5 225.5 414.4 414.4 336.3 336.3 249.4 249.4 88.0
Correction 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.6 -1.3 -1.3 -0.6 -0.8 -5.7 -12.6 -3.7 -5.8 23.0 24.6 -5.0 -4.3 9.4 7.3 -11.0
Actual H. M. 9.11 9.89 10.53 9.47 5.35 5.65 9.44 13.56 14.38 31.62 83.10 132.90 223.27 238.73 175.41 151.59 150.00 116.00 49.30
Rajhena ISP, Rajhena -6,7,8, Banke

n of 80% Reliable Rainfall


N

Oct Nov Dec


72.00 6.00 14.00
27.8 11.3 4.0 6.0 7.6
88.0 15.3 15.3 13.6 13.6
-5.0 -6.8 -2.4 0.2 0.2
22.70 4.43 1.57 6.17 7.83
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP, Rajhena -6,7,8, Banke
Mean monthly flow by MIP Method
Rajhena ISP,
River: Tengra
Catchment Area : 1.5 Sq Km Region 7
Measured flow : 2000 lps
Date of measurement : 6/15/2013 15th June, 2013
Non-Dimensional Measured WECS Half Monthly value of 80% reliable flow flow
Predicted montly flow (l/s)
Months hydrograph (m3/s) flow Hydrograph Name of 80% reliable flow Half Monthly value
Mean Mean (l/s) Months 2000 1st 2nd
Min l/s 80% Reliable flow
May 2.57 0.85 2000.00 148.50 1281.32 May 148.50 155.04 237.15
June 6.08 2.88 2000 4731.52 503.14 4341.40 June 503.14 414.47 1191.45
July 24.32 18.64 6/15/2013 18926.07 3256.41 28098.50 July 3256.41 2568.09 3552.52
Aug 33.78 25.42 26287.94 4440.88 38318.87 Aug 4440.88 4144.76 4219.01
Sept 27.03 20.34 21035.02 3553.40 30661.13 Sept 3553.40 3775.27 2842.80
Oct 6.08 4.07 4731.52 711.03 6135.24 Oct 711.03 1421.62 743.78
Nov 3.38 4.82 2630.35 842.06 7265.81 Nov 842.06 809.29 785.71
Dec 2.57 3.53 2000.00 616.69 5321.23 Dec 616.69 673.03 570.39
Jan 2.03 2.47 1579.77 431.51 3723.35 Jan 431.51 477.80 403.12
Feb 1.62 1.82 1260.70 317.95 2743.52 Feb 317.95 346.34 297.42
Mar 1.27 1.35 988.33 235.85 2035.03 Mar 235.85 256.37 220.55
Apr 1.00 1.00 778.21 174.70 1507.43 Apr 174.70 189.98 168.14
2.57
Note:
Parameter Unit Symbol Value Remarks
MIP Mean flow l/s/km2 Qmean 9.8 Region 7
MIP Low Flow l/s/km2 Qlow 2.2 Region 7
Factor to Apply 0.22 Qlow/Qmean
WECS Low flow l/s Q2 147.49 (0.9299+0.09269*(catch Area+1)^0.5*1000
WECS 80% Flow l/s Q80% 126.84 0.86*Q2
Factor to Apply 38.44 [(Q80%/CA)/1.3], 1.3=min for April, MIP
Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP,
Location:Simariya, Sunsari
Command Area: 750 ha
Existing Cropping Pattern (Without Project)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Crop Area Ha
I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II
Paddy 280
Wheat 55
Potato 40
Maize 50
Total CA 425
Cropping Intensity 56.67 %

Future Cropping Pattern (With Project)


Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Crop Area Ha
I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II
Paddy 300
Vegetable (Summer) 80
Wheat 65
Potato 50
Vegetable (Winter) 60
Maize 50
Total CA 605
Cropping Intensity 80.67 %

6 Cropping Pattern
Cropwater Requirement

Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP, (Wheat) Rainfall station


Location:Simariya, Sunsari Eto, Eo:
Command Area: 80 ha Index No.
Month Jan Feb. Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct
Half month 15 16 14 14 15 16 15 15 15 16 15 15 15 16 15 16 15 15 15 16
Eto (mm/day) 1.96 2.23 2.70 3.38 4.27 5.26 6.35 6.93 7.01 6.54 5.53 4.77 4.26 3.93 3.79 3.63 3.44 3.33 3.29 3.13
Kc 1.15 1.15 1.15 0.90 0.40
ETcrop (mm/day) 2.26 2.57 3.10 3.04 1.71
ETcrop (mm/half month) 33.85 41.08 43.43 42.53 25.59
Land preparation (mm/half month) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Deep percolation (mm/half month) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Evaporation during land preparation Eo mm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Evaporation during land preparation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total crop water requirement (mm/half month) 33.85 41.08 43.43 42.53 25.59
80 % Reliable Rainfall 9.11 9.89 10.53 9.47 5.35
Effective rainfall (mm/half month) 7.74 8.41 8.95 8.05 4.55
Net cropwater requirement (mm/half month) 26.11 32.67 34.48 34.48 21.04
Net cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.20 0.24 0.29 0.29 0.16
Field efficiency 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Field cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.34 0.39 0.48 0.48 0.27
Conveyance Efficiency 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
Cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.45 0.53 0.63 0.63 0.36
Main canal efficiency 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80

Cropwater
Cropwater Requirement

Intake requirement (l/s/ha) 0.56 0.66 0.79 0.79 0.45

Cropwater
Cropwater Requirement

Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP, (Paddy) Rainfall station


Location:Simariya, Sunsari Eto, Eo:
Command Area: 340 ha Index No.
Month Jan Feb. Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct
Half month 15 16 14 14 15 16 15 15 15 16 15 15 15 16 15 16 15 15 15 16
Eto (mm/day) 1.96 2.23 2.70 3.38 4.27 5.26 6.35 6.93 7.01 6.54 5.53 4.77 4.26 3.93 3.79 3.63 3.44 3.33 3.29 3.13
Kc 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.95 0.95
ETcrop (mm/day) 4.17 3.99 3.79 3.66 3.13 2.97
ETcrop (mm/half month) 62.54 63.84 56.80 54.95 46.88 47.50
Land preparation (mm/half month) 55.00 55.00 50.00 50.00
Deep percolation (mm/half month) 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00
Evaporation during land preparation Eo mm 5.75 5.14 4.76
Evaporation during land preparation 86.18 82.16 71.33
Total crop water requirement (mm/half month) 216.18 212.16 258.86 188.84 131.80 129.95 121.88 122.50
80 % Reliable Rainfall 223.27 238.73 175.41 151.59 150.00 116.00 49.30 22.70
Effective rainfall (mm/half month) 156.29 167.11 122.79 106.11 105.00 81.20 41.91 19.30
Net cropwater requirement (mm/half month) 59.89 45.05 136.07 82.73 26.80 48.75 79.98 103.21
Net cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.46 0.33 1.05 0.60 0.21 0.38 0.62 0.75
Field efficiency 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Field cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.54 0.38 1.24 0.70 0.24 0.44 0.73 0.88
Conveyance Efficiency 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
Cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.72 0.51 1.65 0.94 0.32 0.59 0.97 1.17
Main canal efficiency 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80

Cropwater
Cropwater Requirement

Intake requirement (l/s/ha) 0.91 0.64 2.06 1.17 0.41 0.74 1.21 1.46

Cropwater
Cropwater Requirement

Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP, (Maize) Rainfall station


Location:Simariya, Sunsari Eto, Eo:
Command Area: 70 Ha Index No.
Month Jan Feb. Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct
Half month 15 16 14 14 15 16 15 15 15 16 15 15 15 16 15 16 15 15 15 16
Eto (mm/day) 1.96 2.23 2.70 3.38 4.27 5.26 6.35 6.93 7.01 6.54 5.53 4.77 4.26 3.93 3.79 3.63 3.44 3.33 3.29 3.13
Kc 0.45 0.60 0.80 1.05 1.05 1.05 0.80
ETcrop (mm/day) 2.86 4.16 5.61 6.87 5.80 5.00 3.40
ETcrop (mm/half month) 42.83 62.37 84.12 109.91 87.06 75.05 51.06
Land preparation (mm/half month) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Deep percolation (mm/half month) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Evaporation during land preparation Eo mm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Evaporation during land preparation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total crop water requirement (mm/half month) 42.83 62.37 84.12 109.91 87.06 75.05 51.06
80 % Reliable Rainfall 9.44 13.56 14.38 31.62 83.10 132.90 223.27
Effective rainfall (mm/half month) 8.02 11.53 12.22 26.88 70.64 93.03 156.29
Net cropwater requirement (mm/half month) 34.80 50.84 71.90 83.04 16.42 0.00 0.00
Net cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.27 0.39 0.55 0.60 0.13 0.00 0.00
Field efficiency 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Field cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.45 0.65 0.92 1.00 0.21 0.00 0.00
Conveyance Efficiency 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
Cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.60 0.87 1.23 1.33 0.28 0.00 0.00
Main canal efficiency 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80

Cropwater
Cropwater Requirement

Intake requirement (l/s/ha) 0.75 1.09 1.54 1.67 0.35 0.00 0.00

Cropwater
Cropwater Requirement

Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP, (Potatoes) Rainfall station


Location:Simariya, Sunsari Eto, Eo:
Command Area: 60 ha Index No.
Month Jan Feb. Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct
Half month 15 16 14 14 15 16 15 15 15 16 15 15 15 16 15 16 15 15 15 16
Eto (mm/day) 1.96 2.23 2.70 3.38 4.27 5.26 6.35 6.93 7.01 6.54 5.53 4.77 4.26 3.93 3.79 3.63 3.44 3.33 3.29 3.13
Kc 1.01 1.13 1.13 1.08 0.94 0.77
ETcrop (mm/day) 1.98 2.52 3.05 3.65 4.01 4.05
ETcrop (mm/half month) 29.73 40.36 42.67 51.03 60.14 64.74
Land preparation (mm/half month) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Deep percolation (mm/half month) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Evaporation during land preparation Eo mm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Evaporation during land preparation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total crop water requirement (mm/half month) 29.73 40.36 42.67 51.03 60.14 64.74
80 % Reliable Rainfall 9.11 9.89 10.53 9.47 5.35 5.65
Effective rainfall (mm/half month) 7.74 8.41 8.95 8.05 4.55 4.80
Net cropwater requirement (mm/half month) 21.99 31.96 33.72 42.98 55.59 59.94
Net cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.17 0.23 0.28 0.36 0.43 0.43
Field efficiency 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Field cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.28 0.39 0.46 0.59 0.71 0.72
Conveyance Efficiency 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
Cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.38 0.51 0.62 0.79 0.95 0.96
Main canal efficiency 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80

Cropwater
Cropwater Requirement

Intake requirement (l/s/ha) 0.47 0.64 0.77 0.99 1.19 1.20

Cropwater
Cropwater Requirement

Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP, (Summer & Winter Vegetable) Rainfall station
Location:Simariya, Sunsari Eto, Eo:
Command Area: 200 ha 0.2652 Index No.
Month Jan Feb. Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct
Crop Winter Vegetable Summer Vegetable
Half month 15 16 14 14 15 16 15 15 15 16 15 15 15 16 15 16 15 15 15 16
Eto (mm/day) 1.96 2.23 2.70 3.38 4.27 5.26 6.35 6.93 7.01 6.54 5.53 4.77 4.26 3.93 3.79 3.63 3.44 3.33 3.29 3.13
Kc 0.86 0.95 0.95 0.89 0.34 0.54 0.93 1.05 1.05 1.04 0.91
ETcrop (mm/day) 1.69 2.12 2.56 3.00 1.45 2.12 3.52 3.81 3.61 3.46 2.99
ETcrop (mm/half month) 25.32 33.93 35.88 42.05 21.70 33.96 52.87 60.94 54.22 51.95 44.91
Land preparation (mm/half month) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Deep percolation (mm/half month) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Evaporation during land preparation Eo mm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Evaporation during land preparation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total crop water requirement (mm/half month) 25.32 33.93 35.88 42.05 21.70 33.96 52.87 60.94 54.22 51.95 44.91
80 % Reliable Rainfall 9.11 9.89 10.53 9.47 223.27 238.73 175.41 151.59 150.00 116.00 49.30
Effective rainfall (mm/half month) 7.74 8.41 8.95 8.05 156.29 167.11 122.79 106.11 105.00 81.20 41.91
Net cropwater requirement (mm/half month) 17.57 25.53 26.93 34.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00
Net cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.14 0.18 0.22 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02
Field efficiency 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Field cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.23 0.31 0.37 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04
Conveyance Efficiency 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
Cropwater requirement (l/s/ha) 0.30 0.41 0.49 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05

Cropwater
Cropwater Requirement

Main canal efficiency 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Intake requirement (l/s/ha) 0.38 0.51 0.62 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06

Cropwater
: Ghorahi
: Khajura
: 409
Nov Dec
15 15 15 16
2.84 2.48 2.06 1.89
0.43 0.65 1.05
1.07 1.34 1.98
16.00 20.09 31.71
60.00

76.00 20.09 31.71


1.57 6.17 7.83
0.00 0.00 0.00
76.00 20.09 31.71
0.59 0.15 0.23
0.60 0.60 0.60
0.98 0.26 0.38
0.75 0.75 0.75
1.30 0.34 0.51
0.80 0.80 0.80

Cropwater
1.63 0.43 0.64

Cropwater
: Ghorahi
: Khajura
: 409
Nov Dec
15 15 15 16
2.84 2.48 2.06 1.89

Cropwater
Cropwater
: Ghorahi
: Khajura
: 409
Nov Dec
15 15 15 16
2.84 2.48 2.06 1.89

Cropwater
Cropwater
: Ghorahi
: Khajura
: 409
Nov Dec
15 15 15 16
2.84 2.48 2.06 1.89
0.42 0.55 0.79
1.04 1.13 1.49
15.62 17.00 23.86
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
15.62 17.00 23.86
1.57 6.17 7.83
0.00 5.24 6.66
15.62 11.75 17.20
0.12 0.09 0.12
0.60 0.60 0.60
0.20 0.15 0.21
0.75 0.75 0.75
0.27 0.20 0.28
0.80 0.80 0.80

Cropwater
0.33 0.25 0.35

Cropwater
: Ghorahi
: Khajura
: 409
Nov Dec
Winter Vegetable
15 15 15 16
2.84 2.48 2.06 1.89
0.28 0.34 0.54
0.69 0.70 1.02
10.42 10.51 16.31
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
10.42 10.51 16.31
1.57 6.17 7.83
0.00 5.24 6.66
10.42 5.26 9.65
0.08 0.04 0.07
0.60 0.60 0.60
0.13 0.07 0.12
0.75 0.75 0.75
0.18 0.09 0.16

Cropwater
0.80 0.80 0.80
0.22 0.11 0.19

Cropwater
Scheme Water Balance
Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP,
Command Area: 750 ha
Jan Feb. Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct
Crop Cropped Area
I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I
Wheat l/s/ha 0.56 0.66 0.79 0.79 0.45
mm/day 4.84 5.67 6.84 6.84 3.90
80 l/s 44.77 52.52 63.34 63.34 36.08
Paddy l/s/ha 0.91 0.64 2.06 1.17 0.41 0.74 1.21
mm/day 7.83 5.52 17.79 10.14 3.50 6.37 10.45
340 l/s 308.06 217.25 699.96 398.97 137.87 250.75 411.41
Maize l/s/ha 0.75 1.09 1.54 1.67 0.35 0.00 0.00
mm/day 6.45 9.42 13.31 14.42 3.04 0.00 0.00
70 l/s 52.22 76.28 107.87 116.80 24.64 0.00 0.00
Potato l/s/ha 0.47 0.64 0.77 0.99 1.19 1.20
mm/day 4.07 5.55 6.69 8.53 10.29 10.41
60 l/s 28.28 38.53 46.47 59.22 71.49 72.26
Vegitable (Summerl/s/ha 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06
mm/day 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56
100 l/s 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.44
Vegitable (Winter) l/s/ha 0.38 0.51 0.62 0.78
mm/day 3.25 4.43 5.34 6.75
100 l/s 37.66 51.29 61.83 78.09
Total Water
Requirement
l/s 110.71 142.34 171.65 200.64 107.57 72.26 52.22 76.28 107.87 116.80 24.64 0.00 308.06 217.25 699.96 398.97 137.87 250.75 417.84
Volume of Water
Required
MCM/day 9.57 12.30 14.83 17.34 9.29 6.24 4.51 6.59 9.32 10.09 2.13 0.00 26.62 18.77 60.48 34.47 11.91 21.66 36.10
Area coverage 240.00 240.00 240.00 240.00 240.00 60.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 410.00 440.00 440.00 440.00 440.00 440.00 440.00 440.00
80% Reliable flow
l/s 159.58 134.64 115.67 99.34 85.62 73.66 63.45 56.16 51.78 79.20 138.43 397.94 857.74 1186.54 1384.35 1409.14 1260.94 949.49 474.82
Volume of Water
Available
MCM/day 13.79 11.63 9.99 8.58 7.40 6.36 5.48 4.85 4.47 6.84 11.96 34.38 74.11 102.52 119.61 121.75 108.95 82.04 41.02
27 Water balance
Balance flow l/s 48.87 -7.70 -55.98 -101.30 -21.95 1.40 11.23 -20.12 -56.09 -37.60 113.79 397.94 549.68 969.29 684.39 1010.17 1123.07 698.74 56.98

Maximum Discharge Required = 699.96 lps


Design Discharge = 804.959 lps (increase by 15.0% )
Say = 800.00 lps
Then,
Duty = 1.06 l/s/ha considering canal efficiency take duty as 1.3lps/ha

28 Water balance
e Water Balance

Oct Nov Dec


II I II I II
1.63 0.43 0.64
14.07 3.72 5.51
130.31 34.44 50.97
1.46
12.65
497.71

0.33 0.25 0.35


2.89 2.18 2.99
20.09 15.11 20.74

0.22 0.11 0.19


1.93 0.97 1.68
22.33 11.28 19.40

497.71 0.00 172.73 60.83 91.11

43.00 0.00 14.92 5.26 7.87


340.00 340.00 240.00 240.00 240.00

248.42 270.30 190.51 224.79 190.51

21.46 23.35 16.46 19.42 16.46


29 Water balance
-249.29 270.30 17.78 163.96 99.40

30 Water balance
HIGH FLOOD DISCHARGE CALCULATION
Rajhena ISP,
Name of River Kiran
Type of source: Perennial
Catchment area: 5.5 km2
Type of soil: Sandy, medium textured
Infiltration Rate: Moderate
1 SCS or CN Method
Land use details: PDSP,M3, Table 6.2
Landuse % Class CN value
Forest cover 40.00 B 60
Farm lands 30.00 B 81
Baren pastures 30.00 B 60
81
Weighted CN value= 69
69
Area reduction factor= 1 PDSP,M3, Table 6.4
Longest water course= 17.62 km GIS
Highest elevation= 1039.94 m
Elevation at h/w site= 141.73 m
Difference in elevation= 898.21 m
Slope in %= 5.10 %
Hence, slope category Moderate PDSP,M3,Table 6.3
Mean annual rainfall= 123.50 mm
24 hour rainfall from graph= 100.00 mm PDSP,M3, Figure G.2
Take return period for simple intake design= 50 years PDSP,M3, Table 2.1
Growth factor from table 9.15= 2
Design rainfall= 200 mm
For, CN=69 Slope= ModerateDischarge= 20.00 m3/s PDSP,M3, Figure G.7

2 Trash Mark Method


River bed slope= 0.05
High flood level= 143.23 m
Bed level= 141.73 m
River width= 5m
Wetted perimeter= 13.54 m
River top width= 13 m
Area of flow= 13.5 m2
Roughness coefficient (n) = 0.05 PDSP,M3,Table 6.7
Velocity of flow= 1/n*(R)^0.667*(s)^0.5 4.51 m/s
Discharge=A*V 60.83 m3/s
HIGH FLOOD DISCHARGE CALCULATION
Rajhena ISP,

3 Dicken's Formula
Catchment area 5.5 km2
Coefficient for hills 11.5
Discharge= C*A^3/4 41.30 m3/s

4 Ryves Formula
Catchment area 5.5 km2
Coefficient for near to hills 10.1
Discharge= C*A^2/3 31.47 m3/s
From various calculations, the value of high flood flow shows high deviation, so average value is taken
Take High flood Discharge

= 38.41 m 3/s (Average Value)
0 .8 7 8 3
Q 2 0
1 .14 . 63
8767 area
area below 3000
3000m m 0 . 7342
Q 10 below
Reduced Level of Canals at intake

Name of the project : Rajhena ISP, Rajhena -6,7,8, Banke


Canal Main Canal Slope 1 in 4000
Bed Level of Canal Inlet RL1 76.025 m
Height of Water y1 0.86 m
FSL FSL1 76.88 m
Velocity v1 0.41
velocity head hv1 v2/2g 0.01
TEL TEL1 y+hv 76.890
entry loss hle 0.5*v /2g
2
0.00
Total Head Required 76.894

Source Tengra Khola


Bed Level of Canal Inlet RL1 75.20 m
Height of Water y1 1.98 m
FSL FSL1 77.18 m
Velocity v1 0.50 m/s
velocity head hv1 v2/2g 0.01 m
TEL TEL1 y+hv 77.19 m
entry loss hle 0.5*v2/2g 0.01 m
Total Head Required 77.20 m

Pond Level required


equal to maintain FSL in canal maximum 77.181 m
Headwork Design

Name of the project : Rajhena ISP, Rajhena -6,7,8, Banke


A Design of Waterway
Lowest elevation of Dam = 141.73 m
Crest level
Gated Spillway Portion = 142.73 m
Weir portion = 146.50 m
Water way
High Flood Discharge = 38.41 m3/s
Total Length of Weir Top = 13.00 m
Adopt 20.00 m
a) Dam Portion
Length = 14.50 m
b) Spillway Portion
Divide Wall 0.50

No of bays 3.00 no
Length of a bay = 1.50 m
No fo piers 2.00 no
Width of pier = 0.25 m
Clear Water way 4.50
Water way 1 5.00 m

Check for Discharge


D/s high flood level = 143.23 m
(HFL before weir construction)
Pond Level = 145.80 m

Average discharge intensity (q) = 7.68 m3/s/m


(HFDischarge/ waterway)
Average dia of silt = 0.90 mm
Silt Factor (f) = 1.19
f = 1.25dmm
Scour depth ( R) = 4.97 m
R = 1.35*(q2/f)1/3
Approach velocity (V) = 1.55 m/s
q/R
Velocity head (hv) = 0.12 m
V2/2g
U/s total energy level = 145.92 m
hv+u/s HFL

Head over the gated spillway crest = 3.20 m


u/s TEL- Gated spillway crest level
Discharge through Gated Spillway (Q1) = 39.27 m3/s
1.7(L-knH)H^(3/2) (k = 0.1)
Broad crested (water depth over crest< 1.5crest width)
of HFD = 0.00 m3/s

Total Discharge = 39.27 m3/s O.K

A - 34
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP, Rajhena -6,7,8, Banke

Length of Dam L = 14.50 m


Lowest elevation of Dam = 141.73 m
Up stream slope of dam 1 in 3
Down stream slope 1 in 2
Length of fetch F = 2 km
Wind speed V = 3 m/s
Length of filter blanket from toe of Dam = 3m
Thickness of filter blanket 0.5 m
Dry unit weight of soil in the dam dry = 1.8 t/m3
Submerged unit weight of soil in the dam sub = 1.2 t/m3
Dry unit weight of foundation soil dry,f = 1.83 t/m3
Saturated unit weight of soil sat = 2.2 t/m3
Cohesion of dam soil c = 2.4 t/m2
Cohesion of foundation soil c' = 5.4 t/m2
Angle of internal friction of dam soil = 25 Degree
Angle of internal friction of foundation soil ' = 12 Degree
Depth of foundation below ground level Df = 3m

1) Safty against Overtopping


Elevation of canal intake = 76.30
Wave height hW = 0.386 m
0.032*(F*V)+0.763-0.271*(F)(3/4)
Along slopes, the waves rides to a height of 1.5hw 0.578 m
Needed Dam Top level 77.78 m
Adopt 77.80 m
Height of dam H = -63.93 m
FB due to settlement 2% of H -1.279 m
Total FB required -0.700 m
Reservoir water level (pond level) = 145.80 m
High flood level = 145.80 m
Free Board provided -68.00 m
Top width of dam TW = Err:502 m
0.55H+0.2*H
Adopt 3m

Dam Design 35
C Design of Undersluice Portion
a) Assuming no concentration and retrogression
Flood Discharge Qu = 38.41 m3/s
Flow Width Bu = 5.00 m
Discharge Intensity q= 7.68 m3/s/m
Incoming Velocity head Hv = 0.12 m
U/S floor level BLu/s = 141.73 m
U/S total energy level TELu/s = BLu/s + h 145.66 m
U/S High Flood water level HFLu/s = TEL u/s - hv 145.54 m
D/S High Flood Level HFLd/s = 143.23 m
D/S total Energy Level TELd/s = HFLd/s +Hv 143.35 m
height of water h= 2.93
Head Loss HL = TELu/s -TELd/s 2.31 m
Discharge Intensity q= qu = CH 3/2
8.54 m3/s/m
C= 1.7
Down stream River bed level BLd/s = 141.73 m

145.66
u/s TEL 145.54
u/s HFL 2.31
2.93
2.81 143.35 d/s TEL
143.23 d/s WL
142.73
141.73
141.73

b) Increase in discharge 20% & RetrogressionR= 0.50 m


Flood Discharge through undersluice Qu,2 = Qu *1.2 46.09 m3/s
Discharge Intensity qmax = Qflood / Lusluice 9.22 m3/s/m
Velocity head required to pass this flood h= (q/C) 2/3
3.09
U/S total energy level TELu/s = BLu/s + h 145.81 m
Silt Factor (f) f = 1.25dmm 1.19
Scour depth ( R) R = 1.35*(q2/f)1/3 5.61 m
Approach velocity (V) q/R 1.64 m/s
Velocity head (hv) V2/2g 0.14 m
U/S HF water level HFLu/s = TEL u/s - hv 145.67 m
Down stream River bed level BLd/s = BLu/s - R = 141.23 m
Down stream Depth of water Hw,d/s = 1.50 m
From Stage Discharge Curve for Q= 46.09 cumec
D/S total Energy Level TELd/s = WLd/s +Hv 142.85 m
Head Loss HL = TELu/s -TELd/s 2.96 m
D/s water level WLd/s = BLd/s + Hw,d/s 142.73 m

u/s TEL 145.81


u/s HFL 145.67
2.96
3.09 142.85
2.95 d/s TEL
142.73 d/s WL
142.73
141.73
141.23

C - 36
C Design of Undersluice Portion

C - 37
C Design of Undersluice Portion
3 Depth of cutoff from scour Consideration
Discharge Intensity q= 9.22 m3/s/m
Depth of Scour R= 1.35*(q2/f)1/3 5.61 m
D/s cutoff depth below HFL Dd/s = 1.5*R 8.41 m
Bottom Level of Cutoff BLcf,r = WLd/s - Dd/s 134.31 m
D/s Floor Level FLd/s = From Weir Table 138.07 m
Cutoff depth required Dcf,r = FLd/s - BLcf,r 3.76 m
Adopt Dcf = 3.80 m
Adopt Bottom Level of Cutoff BLcf = BLcf,r+Dcf,r-Dcf 134.27 m
U/s cutoff depth below HFL Du/s = 1.25*R 7.01 m
Bottom Level of Cutoff BLcf,r = WLu/s - Du/s 138.66 m
Cutoff depth required Dcf,r = FLd/s - BLcf,r 3.06 m
Adopt Dcf = 3.10 m
Adopt bottom Level of Cutoff BLcf = BLcf,r+Dcf,r-Dcf 138.63 m
Adopt bottom thickness of Cutoff 0.5 m

4 Total Floor length and Exit Gradient

Safe exit gradient Ge = 1 in 4.50 0.222


Maximum Static head Hmax = HFLu/s-FLd/s 7.60 m

Depth of down stream cutoff d= FLd/s-BLcf 3.80 m


Ge = H/(d*Pl
1/Pl = Ge*d/H l (H/(d*Ge*P2 8.22
= {(2*l-1)2-1} 15.40
Breadth of floor b= *d 58.51 m
Adopt Ltotal = 59.00 m
Now
Down sream floor length From Jump Calculation 18 m
From design of Stilling basin 20.63 m
finally, Adopt Ld/s = 21.00 m

Level different of d/s & u/s floor level FLdiff = FLu/s-FLd/s 4.66 m
Glacis Slope Sglacis = 1 in 3
Sloping length Lglacis = Sglacis *FLdiff 13.97 m
Adopt 13.97 m
Level different of u/s floor & undersluice crest l FLdiff,2 = RLsluice - FLu/s 1 m
Upstream Slope of weir Sglacis,d/s = 1 in 1
Sloping length Lglacis,u/s = Sglacis,d/s *FLdiff,2 1.000
Adopt 1.000
top width of undersluice Wu/s = 1.000
Up sream floor length Lu/s = Ltotal -Ld/s-Lglacis,d/s-Wweir-Lglacis,u/s 22.04 m

5 Uplift Pressure
Assume thickness of u/s floor tu/s = 0.3 m
Assume thickness of d/s floor (Average) td/s = 0.5 m
Detail in Profile Calculation 142.73
141.73
0.3 3
E1 C1 1 138.07
1 C - 38
C Design of Undersluice Portion
3.10 1 C2
138.63 2 E2
D1 1.00 D2
22.04 1.00 13.97 21.00
59.00 (After Design of Stilling Basi

C - 39
C Design of Undersluice Portion
Up stream Cutoff No 1
b Ltotal 21.00 m
d Dcf,u/s 3.06 m
a b/d 6.86
(1-(1+2))/2 3.97
E 1/*acos((-2)/) 34.00 %
D 1/*acos((-1)/) 24.00 %
E1 100 %
C1 100-E 66.00 %
D1 100-D 76.00 %
Down stream Cutoff No 2
b Ltotal 21.00 m
d Dcf,d/s 3.80 m
a b/d 5
(1-(1+2))/2 3.05
C2 0%
E2 1/*acos((-2)/) 39.00 %
D2 1/*acos((-1)/) 27.00 %
Correction for C1
i) Effect of cutoff 2 on cutoff 1 of depth d
Correction 19*(d+D)/b*(D/b') 6.74 %
D Flu/s-tu/s-BLcf,d/s 8.16 m
d Flu/s-tu/s-BLcf,u/s 3.80 m
b' Ltotal 21.00 m
b Ltotal 21.00 m

ii) Correction for Depth


Correction (D1-C1)*tu/s/Dcf,u/s 0.97 %

Corrected C1 C1+Correction(i+ii) 73.71 %


Correction for E2
i) Effect of cutoff 1 on cutoff 2 of depth d
Correction 19*(D/b')*((d+D)/b) 0%
D FLd/s-td/s-BLcf,u/s or 0 0.00 m
d FLd/s-td/s-BLcf,b/s 3.30 m
b' Ltotal 21.00 m
b Ltotal 21.00 m
ii) Correction for Depth
Correction (E2-D2)*tu/s/Dcf,u/s 1.58 %
Corrected E2 E2-Correction(i+ii) 37.42 %

6 Design of Floor

The worst Condition occurs at static head at pond Level


Assumed Thickness of Floor at upstream Floor 0.3 m
Down stream Floor 2.1 m
Taking 1 m Strip for analysis
Total uplift pressure beyond the starting point ofFup = 119.10 m2
C - 40
C Design of Undersluice Portion
From Profile Table Pup = Fup *1000 119104.39 kg/m2
Total Weight of RCC Floor WRCC = ARCC * 2400 = 148234.76 kg/m2

C - 41
C Design of Undersluice Portion
7 Down Stream Protection
Depth of Scour hole D= BLcf,r or 0 3.76 m
Length of Protection L= 2.25D 8.46 m
Adopt 9m
Thickness of Lunching (Gabion Lunching) tg = 0.06*Q^1/3 0.20 m
Adopt 0.5 m
Size of square Block
Length 1.20 m
Thickness 0.75 m
Inverted Filter 9.75 m
Thickness of Inverted Filter 0.75 m
Inverted Filter 1.20 m
0.75X0.75X9.75 m size PCC block of 1nos with 10 cm gap between blocks over 1.196 cm thick Inverted Filter
Total Length of Inverted filter 0.85 m

8 Up Stream Protection
Depth of Scour hole D= Dcf,r or 0 3.06 m
Length of Protection 1.5D 4.59 m
1.2X1.2X0.75 m size PCC block of 4nos with 10 cm gap between blocks over 0.75 cm thick Inverted Filter
Adopted Length 5m
Length of Packed Apron 1.5*D 4.59 m

C - 42
C - 43
0.5
3.80
134.27

gn of Stilling Basi

C - 44
+Ve

+Ve

-Ve

-Ve

C - 45
SAFE

C - 46
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of energy dissipator for under sluice


2.1 General
Retrogression 0.50 m
Discharge intensity qu 9.22 m3/s/m
Head over crest hw 2.95 m
Upstream total energy line U/S TEL 145.81 m
Downstream total energy line D/S TEL 142.85 m
Velocity head V2/(2g) 0.12 m
Head loss HL 2.31 m
Downstream high flood level D/S HFL 142.73 m
D/S specific energy Ef2 4.49 m
U/S specific energy Ef1= Ef2+hL 7.45 m
Level of jump D/s TEL - Ef2 138.36 m
Post jump depth d2 4.25 m
Pre jump depth d1 0.81 m
Length of floor 59.00 m
Froude number 4.06
Tail Water depth d3 1.50 m
Critical depth dc ={9.2^2/9.81}^(1/3) = 2.05 m
Tail water depth terms of d2 d2 =1.50/4.25 = 0.35 d2
Velocity of inflow V1 =9.22/0.81 = 11.42 m/s
Froude number, Fr (=V/sqrt(g*d1) Fr = (V/(gd1)1/2 =[11.4/{9.81*0.8]^(1/2)= 4.06
Length of cistern Lc =6.0{4.25-0.81} = 20.63 m
Length of cistern provided Lc 21.00 m
2.2 Chute block
Height of chute block Hc d1 0.81 m
length of chute block Lc 3*d1 2.43 m
width of chute block Wc d1 0.81 m
spacing of chute block Sc d1 0.81 m

Fractional spacing of chute block from wall Sw 0.5d1 0.40 m

2.3 Floor block


Height of floor blocks hf d1 0.81 m
Width of floor block wf 0.75hf 0.61 m
Spacing of floor block Sf 0.75hf 0.61 m
Location of floor blocks from d/s end of 0.8d2 3.40 m
chute block
2.4 End sill
Top width 0.50 m
Height of sill 0.2*d2 0.85 m
Sill level 138.92 m
0.50

I- 1
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
1 1
3 3.40 2 0.85
Lj = 21.00 m

I- 2
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Calculation of Parameters for Jump Formation


UnderSluice Portion
Without
With concentration &
S.N. Item concentration &
retrogression
retrogression
1 Discharge intensity(q) m3/s/m 7.68 m3/s/m 9.22 m3/s/m
2 U/s Water level 145.54 m 145.67 m
3 D/s Water level 143.23 m 142.73 m
4 U/s TEL 145.66 m 145.81 m
5 D/s TEL 143.35 m 142.85 m
6 Headloss HL 2.31 m 2.96 m
y1 (Using formula) 0.742 m 0.807 m
y2 (Using formula) y 1/2(-
1+sqrt(1+8q^2/(2*g*y1^3))) 3.67 m 4.25 m
7 Ef2 (Using formula) y2+q^2/(2*g*y2^2) 3.90 m 4.49 m

8 Level at which jump will form 139.45 m 138.36 m


D/s TEL-Ef2
9 Ef1 6.21 m 7.45 m
Ef2+HL
12 Length of concrete floor required 15 m 18 m
5(y1-y2)
13 Froude No. 3.84 m 4.06 m
F1= (q/(gy1^3))
Down stream Floor length = 18 m
Lowest Level at which jump will form = 138.36 m
Depth (below) jump formation level = 0.29
Downstream floor Level = 138.07 m

D-3
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Calculation of Hydraulic Gradient Line

Height/ Elevation of Sub Soil H G Line above Datum for Undersluice Portion
Upstream Cutoff No 1 Downstream cutoff No. 2
U/s Water D/S Water Level Head in m
Condition of Flow
Level in m in m (H)
E1 D1 C1 E2 D2 C2
100% 76% 66% 39% 27% 0%
No Flow Maximum Static Head
(No Water Downstream) 145.67 138.07 7.60 7.60 5.77 5.01 2.96 2.05 0
145.67 143.84 143.08 141.03 140.12 138.07
Undersluice 145.67 142.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
145.67 145.67 145.67 145.67 145.67 145.67

E-4
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Calculation of Pre-Jump Profile

High flood Flow


Distance From the end
Glacis
of the crest i.e the start 9.22 m3/s/m Remarks
Level (m)
of the Glacis ( m) Ef1 (u/s TEL-Glacis Level) y1
0 142.725 3.09
2.00 142.058 3.75 1.181
3.00 141.725 4.09 1.082
4.00 141.392 4.42 1.008
5.00 141.058 4.75 0.950
6.00 140.725 5.09 0.902
7.00 140.392 5.42 0.862
13.10 138.360 7.45 0.807 Point at which jump will form at High flood level

F-5
Water Profile and Floor Thickness Calculation
u/s WL
145.67 Max Unbalanced Head

1.181 140.89 138.07


1.082
1.008 143.12
142.73 0.950
141.73 0.902 1.20
0.862 0.807 4.25
1.22 2.01 2.25 2.44 2.62 2.93 0.00 0.00
2.00 0.81
138.88
3.00 1.00 138.07
4.00 3.00
5.00 4.00
6.00 2.5
7.00 6.00
13.10 7.00
0.00
0.00

24.04 13.97 21.00


Unbalanced head in Jump Trough at undersluice, during High Flood
145.67

2.95 145.67 2.99 3.78 4.17 4.56 4.64


1.06 4.64
142.73
141.73 141.03
4.61 3.83 3.43 3.04
2.96
138.07
10.00
15.00
38.00 20.00
24.04 13.97 21.00
59

Head loss (HL) 7.60 Submerged Concrete weight WSC 1.24 kg/m3
total Creep length(L) 72.8 Floor thickness Required t / WSC R.L
H-6
Length upto Jump (l) 28.6 at point of jump 4.61 3.80 m 134.27
h= HL*l/L 2.987 11 m from toe 3.83 3.10 m 134.97
Specific gravity of RCC (G) 2.4 6 m from toe 3.43 2.80 m 135.27
t= 1.22(h/(G-1)) 2.85 2.90 1 m from toe 3.04 2.50 m 135.57
max unbalanced head 1.20
design for thickness= 2/3 of unbalanced head 0.80 0.90

H-7
e and Floor Thickness Calculation

d/s WL at worst condition

d/s WL

d/s RL

7.60

H-8
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Backwater Calculation

Bed width of river = B = 10.50 m


Bed slope of river = Sb = 0.0100 (1 in 100)
Side slope of river = s = 1.5 (1.5H:1V)
Design discharge = Q = 9.80 cumecs
Manning's coefficient = n = 0.05
yc 0.715 m
yn 1.020 m
Let yc and yn be critical and normal depth
Let afflux be, h = 0.00 m
Total depth of flow = Z = 0.75 m
Hydraulic depth = D = (Byc+syc2)/(B+2syc) yc D V (gD)
Velocity = V = Q/(Byc+syc2) 0.5 0.45 1.74 2.10
At critical flow = V/(gD) = 1.00 1.0 0.85 0.82 2.89
By Trial and error from V=(gD), yc = 0.716 m 0.8 0.69 1.05 2.60
By Trial and error from Q=AV, where 0.7 0.61 1.21 2.45
A = (Byn+syn2), 0.715 0.62 1.18 2.47
and, R = (Byn+syn2)/(B+2(s2+12)yn),
yn = 1.020 m yn A P R V
Let afflux be, h = 0.00 m 1.50 19.13 15.91 1.20 0.51
Then, total depth of flow, y = 1.020 m 0.80 9.36 13.38 0.70 1.05
Vc = 1.18 m/s 1.00 12.00 14.11 0.85 0.82
Since y > yn > yc, the flow is of M1 type. 1.020 12.27 14.18 0.87 0.80
TEL 77.181 m

J- 9
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Backwater Calculation
Computations are done in the following table.
Change in
River Total Average Total
Water Depth Width of Area of Velocity Hydraulic Friction Total
Parameter Bed level Bank Velocity Energy Friction Distance Energy
level of flow flow flow head Radius Slope Energy
Level Level Slope Level
Level
Unit m m m m m2 m/s m m m - - m m m
Notation BL WL RBL y B A V hv TEL R S f
S fmean L D TEL TEL'
A/ TEL1+DT
Formula Surveyed Trial m WL-BL WL-BL By+sy2 Q/A V2/2g WL+hv [B+2(s2+1 (Vn/R2/3)2 (Sf+Sf)/2 - LSfmean
)y] EL
Chainage
0+000 75.199 77.174 78.987 1.975 10.50 26.59 0.37 0.007 77.181 1.51 0.00020 77.18
0+050 75.375 77.184 79.065 1.809 11.00 24.81 0.40 0.008 77.192 1.42 0.00025 0.00022 50.00 0.011 77.192
0+100 75.370 77.197 79.097 1.827 12.00 26.93 0.36 0.007 77.204 1.45 0.00020 0.00022 50.00 0.011 77.203
0+150 75.432 77.207 79.107 1.775 12.00 26.03 0.38 0.007 77.214 1.41 0.00022 0.00021 50.00 0.011 77.214
0+200 75.165 77.219 79.035 2.054 12.00 30.97 0.32 0.005 77.224 1.60 0.00013 0.00018 50.00 0.009 77.223
0+250 75.279 77.225 79.479 1.946 12.00 29.04 0.34 0.006 77.231 1.53 0.00016 0.00015 50.00 0.007 77.231
0+300 74.673 77.234 79.043 2.561 12.00 40.57 0.24 0.003 77.237 1.91 0.00006 0.00011 50.00 0.006 77.237
0+350 74.870 77.237 79.300 2.367 12.00 36.81 0.27 0.004 77.241 1.79 0.00008 0.00007 50.00 0.004 77.240
0+400 74.862 77.241 79.170 2.379 12.00 37.05 0.26 0.004 77.245 1.80 0.00008 0.00008 50.00 0.004 77.245
0+450 74.787 77.246 79.077 2.459 12.00 38.57 0.25 0.003 77.249 1.85 0.00007 0.00008 50.00 0.004 77.249
0+500 74.847 77.249 79.047 2.402 12.00 37.48 0.26 0.003 77.253 1.81 0.00008 0.00007 50.00 0.004 77.253
-

The above calculation shows that the backwater effect is negligible upstream upto a 500m. Hence the effect beyond this point need not be considered. Furthermore,
the general terrain of ground adjacent to the river on both sides is more than the backwater level. Hence, onboth side, guide bund up to 147m RL with 2m top width is
proposed 300m u/s is proposed.

J - 10
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Guide Bund and Launching Apron

Waterway provided for the river at crossing point (L) 20.00 m


Length of guide bund u/s =1.25 L 25.00 m
From Back water curve 300.00 m
Length of Protection from u/s cutoff to beginning of undersluice 24.04
Remaining Length 275.97
Adopt 280.00 m
Length of guide bund d/s =0.25 L 5.00 m
Adopt 5.00

Radius of head for u/s bund =0.45*L 9.00 m


Angle of head (120 to 145 )
o o
130.00 o
Radius of head for d/s bund =0.25*L 5.00 m
Angle of head 60.00 o

a) Design of Shank
HF discharge 46.09 m3/s
Top width 2.00 m
Scour depth, R 5.61 m
Waterway, L 20.00 m
HFL 145.67 m
Velocity 1.64 m/s
Velocity head v2/2g 0.14 m
Water level on rear side of bund 145.81
Allowing min free board of 0.25 m
Top of bund 146.06 m
Adopt 77.50 m
The guide bund material is of river bed coarse sand and gravel and hence the sideslopes of 1.5 :1 will be
provided.

River side will be pitched with gabion crate filled with boulder and the rear side will be covered with earth for
grassing and turfing.

The thichness of pitching on river side T 0.06Q 1 / 3 0.22 m


Provide thickness of pitching 0.30 m

b) Design of Apron
HFL 145.67 m
Average river bed level 141.73 m
Discharge intensity 2.30 m3/s/m
Silt factor for coarse sand 1.19
Scour depth (R ) 2.23 m
Scour depth at nose of guide bund = 2.5 R 5.56 m
Scour depth at transition portion = 1.5 R 3.34 m
Scour depth at straight portion =1.25 R 2.67 m

K - 11
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Guide Bund and Launching Apron
a. Nose portion
RL of anticipated launched apron 140.11 m
Depth of scour below bed level D 1.61 m
Assuming the apron will be launched at 2:1 slope the length
l = D (5)^0.5 3.60 m
Thickness of launching apron,t 0.30 m
Design thickness = 1.9 t 0.57 m
Adopt 0.50 m
Volume of stones per m length V = l* t 1.08 m3
Width of apron is generally kept as 1.5*D 2.42 m
Take thickness of apron as 1 m for width of 6.00 m
Hence thickness of apron, t= V/ W 0.18 m
Adopt 0.50 m
b. Transition
RL of anticipated launched apron 142.33 m
Depth of scour below bed level -0.61 m
Assuming the apron will be launched at 2:1 slope the length
l = D (5)^0.5 -1.36 m
Thickness of launching apron,t 0.30 m
Design thickness = 1.25 t 0.38 m
Adopt 0.30 m
Volume of stones per m length V = l* t -0.41 m3
Width of apron is generally kept as 1.5*D -0.91 m
Take thickness of apron as 1 m for width of 3.00 m
Hence thickness of apron, t= V/ W 0.45 m
Adopt 0.50 m
c. For river side Shank portion
RL of anticipated launched apron 143.00 m
Depth of scour below bed level -1.28 m
Assuming the apron will be launched at 2:1 slope the length
l = D (5)^0.5 -2.86 m
Thickness of launching apron,t 0.30 m
Design thickness = 1.25 t 0.38 m
Adopt 0.30 m
Volume of stones per m length V = l* t -0.86 m3
Width of apron is generally kept as 1.5*D -1.92 m
Take thickness of apron as 1 m for width of 3.00 m
Hence thickness of apron, t= V/ W 0.45 m
Adopt 0.50 m
d. For d/s guide bund
Size of apron
Nose thickness 0.50 m
Length 3.00 m
Transition thickness 0.30 m
Length 3.00 m

K - 12
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Guide Bund and Launching Apron
Shank thickness 0.30 m
Length 3.00 m

K - 13
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Divide Wall

Safe Bearing Capacity of Soil pa = 110 KN/m2


Strength of Steel st = 230 KN/m2
Characteristic Strength Fck= 20 N/mm2
Unit weight of Water w = 9.81 KN/m3
Unit weight of concrete c = 25 KN/m3
Lever Arm for M20 j= 0.906
k= 0.138
Bond stress for 1:1.5:3 (M20) 7.848 N/mm2
Shear stress 1.6 N/mm2 RLDW,t 146.50
HFL HFL = 145.67 m HFL 145.67 0.50 FB
Floor Level RLfl = 141.73 m
Height of water Hw = 3.95 m
Free Board FB = 0.50 m HDW 4.78
RL of Divide Wall top RLDW,t = 146.50 m Hw 3.949
Thickness of Divide Wall tdw = 0.50 m
Height of Divide Wall H= 4.78 m
Length of Divide Wall L= 59.00 m
Thickness of floor tf = 1.10 m
Thickness of cover tcov = 50 mm RLfl 141.73
Effective Thickness of floor tf,e = 1m

Design of Stem (the vertical wall)


Vertical bar required (min 0.5%
of sectional area) 0.50%
Abar,req = 147,500.00 mm2
Undersluice side 65% 95,875.00 mm2
Dam side 35% 51,625.00 mm2
Undersluice side
Provide bar dia bar = 25 mm
Abar = bar
2
/4 490.88 mm2
No of bar required Nbar,req = Abar,req,us / Abar +1 196
No of bar provided Nbar = 196
Area of Steel Provided TAst = Nbar * Abar 96,212.48 mm2
Reinforcement is Adequate
spacing required L / (Nbar -1) 302.56 mm c/c
Provide spacing 300.00 mm c/c
Provide 196 no of 25 mm dia bar @ 300 mm spacing.
Weir side
Provide bar dia bar = 20 mm
Abar = bar
2
/4 314.16 mm2
No of bar required Nbar,req = Abar,req,weir / Abar +1 165
No of bar provided Nbar = 165
Area of Steel Provided TAst = Nbar * Abar 51,836.40 mm2

L - 14
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Divide Wall
Reinforcement is Adequate
spacing required L / (Nbar -1) 359.76
Provide spacing 350.000 mm c/c
Provide 165 no of 20 mm dia bar @ 350 mm spacing.
stirrups
Area Required 25%of Ast = 36,875.00 mm2
Bar dia bar = 12 mm
Abar = bar
2
/4 113.1 mm2
No of bar required Nbar,req = Abar,req / Abar +1 164
No of bar provided Nbar = 164
Area of Steel Provided TAst = Nbar * Abar 37,096.80 mm2
Reinforcement is Adequate
spacing required 1000*H / (Nbar -1) 29.29 mm c/c
Provide spacing at 30 mm c/c
Provide 164 no of 12 mm dia. bar

Design of R.C. Footing


Load on footing
Due to gate and spindle Wg = Wg / 2 0.576 KN From Gate design
Load due to divide wall Wdw = c*HtwdL 3521.5625 KN
Total load Wsum = 3521.56 KN
Weight of Footing (assuming
3% of superimposed load 3% * Wsum 105.65 KN
Total load Wtot = 3627.21 KN
Area of the Footing required Afoot,req = Wtot /pa 32.97 m2
Width Required Bfoot,req = Afoot,req / L 0.56 m
Asuming width of Footing Bfoot = 1+ tdw +1 = 2.5 or 20.00 m Area of foot is equivalent to
Adopt length of Footing Lfoot = L 59.00 m that of the total headwork
Area of the Footing Afoot = Bfoot*Lfoot 1180 m2 OKAY
Net upward soil pressure on
the footing (deducting footing) Pup = Wsum / Afoot 2.98 KN/m2
Load of wall on footing per m2
of contact area Wfoot = Wsum / (B*L) 119.38 KN/m2
The critical section A for B/4 outside the edge
moment will be Bcr = of wall 0.125 m

Max B.M.at point A per meter (Pup*Bfoot)/2* [(B/2-


length of footing M= Bcr)]2) 75,856.72 KNm
(M / (0.138
Depth of Footing required d= *Fck*Bfoot)) 1,172.27 mm Increase area of Footing
Adopt Effective depth de = 1.00 m
Over all depth dall = 1.10 m
Area of Total steel required TAst,req = M / (j *st*de)) 364030.71 mm2
Area of steel required Ast,req = 87% of TAst,req 316706.72 mm2

L - 15
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Divide Wall
Calculation of Main Bars
bar dia provided bar = 25 mm
Abar = bar2/4 490.87 mm2
No of bar required Nbar = Abar,req / Abar +1 646
No of bar provided 646
Total Area of steel TAst = Nbar * Abar 317104.51 mm2 OKAY
Spacing required 1000* Lfoot / (Nbar -1) 91.00 mm c/c
Spacing provided Sp = 100
Provide 646 no of 25 mm dia bar @ 100 mm spacing.
sectional area of Footing / m Asect = 1100000 mm2/m
0.15% of sectional
area of Distribution bar required Abar,req = area 1650 mm2/m
bar dia provided bar = 8 mm
Abar = bar2/4 50.27 mm2
No of bar required Nbar = Abar,req / Abar +1 33
No of bar provided 33
Total Area of steel TAst = Nbar * Abar 1658.77 mm2 OKAY
Spacing required 1000* Bfoot / (Nbar -1) 625.00 mm c/c
300.000 mm c/c
Provide 33 no of 8 mm dia bar @ 300 mm spacing.

Shear Force at A (critical shear (Pup*Bfoot)*[(Bfoot/2-


1-way) F1 = Bcr)-de] 528.95 KN
SF at face of wall F2 = Pup*(Bfoot-B) / 2 29.06 KN
max F= maximum 528.95 KN
Bond stress at face of wall F/(jd*Nbar*(perimeterbar) 0.01 N/mm2
SAFE in 1 way Shear
The diagonal tension will be
tested at a point B, (half of
effective depth) away from the
face of the wall de / 2 = 0.5 m
SF at that point B will be V= Pup*[Afoot-(Bfoot+de)2] 3509.7 KN
Effective depth at that point de = 1.1 m
Shear stress at point B V / (de*j) 3.52 N/mm2
redesign
0.50

Provide 196 no of 25 mm
dia bar @ 300 mm
10 Vert spacing.
Provide 165 no of 20 mm
dia bar @ 350 mm
spacing.
0.125 Stirrups Provide 164 no of 12 mm dia. bar
9.25

Provide 646 no of 25 mm
dia bar @ 100 mm
9.75 A Main bar spacing.
Provide 33 no of 8 mm dia
B Distribution bar @ 300 mm spacing.

1.1 1.1

L - 16
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Divide Wall
0.5
20
DivideWall

L - 17
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Pier

Safe Bearing Capacity of Soil pa = 110 KN/m2


Strength of Steel st = 230 KN/m2
Characteristic Strength Fck= 20 N/mm2
Unit weight of Water w = 9.81 KN/m3
Unit weight of concrete c = 25 KN/m3
Lever Arm for M20 j= 0.906
k= 0.138
Bond stress for 1:1.5:3 (M20) 7.848 N/mm2
Shear stress 1.6 N/mm2 RLBW,t 146.50
Height of water Hw = 3.95 m HFL 145.67 0.50 FB
Height of Breast wall HBW = 4.43 m
Thickness of Breast Wall tbw = 0.2 m
width of breast wall Lbw = 0.10 m HDW 4.78
Thickness of Pier tdw = 0.25 m Hw 3.95 4.43 HBW
Height of Pier H= 4.78 m
Length of Pier L= 5m
Thickness of floor tf = 0.3 m RLBW,b 142.08
Thickness of cover tcov = 50 mm 0.35 x
Effective Thickness of floor tf,e = 0.2 m RLfl 141.73

Design of Stem (the vertical wall)


Vertical bar required (min 0.5%
of sectional area) 0.5 %
Abar,req = 6250 mm2
calculation of one face 50% 3125 mm2
Provide bar dia bar = 16 mm
Abar = bar2/4 201.07 mm2
No of bar required Nbar,req = Abar,req,us / Abar +1 16
No of bar provided Nbar = 16
Area of Steel Provided TAst = Nbar * Abar 3217.12 mm2 Reinforcement is Adequate

spacing required L / (Nbar -1) 333.33 mm c/c


Provide spacing 250.00 mm c/c
Provide 16 no of 16 mm dia bar @ 250 mm spacingon both faces.
stirrups
Area Required 25%xAst = 1562.5 mm2
Bar dia bar = 8 mm
Abar = bar
/4
2
50.27 mm2
No of bar required Nbar,req = Abar,req / Abar +1 32
No of bar provided Nbar = 32

M - 18
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Pier
Area of Steel Provided TAst = Nbar * Abar 1608.64 mm2 Reinforcement is Adequate

M - 19
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Pier
spacing required 1000*H / (Nbar -1) 154.03 mm c/c
Provide spacing at 150.00 mm c/c
Provide 32 no of 8 mm dia. bar

Design of R.C. Footing


Load on footing
Due to gate and spindle Wg = Wg 1.152 KN From Gate design
Due to Breast wall Wbw = c*HBW tbwLbw 2.21 KN
Load due to Pier Wdw = c*HtwdL 149.2188 KN
Total load Wsum = 151.43 KN
Weight of Footing (assuming 3%
of superimposed load 3% * Wsum 4.54 KN
Total load Wtot = 155.97 KN
Area of the Footing required Afoot,req = Wtot /pa 1.42 m2
Width Required Bfoot,req = Afoot,req / L 0.28 m
Asuming width of Footing Bfoot = 1+ tdw +1 2.25 m
Adopt length of Footing Lfoot = L 5m
Area of the Footing Afoot = Bfoot*Lfoot 11.25 m2 OKAY
Net upward soil pressure on the
footing (deducting footing) Pup = Wsum / Afoot 13.46 KN/m2
Load of wall on footing per m2 of
contact area Wfoot = Wsum / (B*L) 121.15 KN/m2

The critical section A for B/4 outside the


moment will be Bcr = edge of wall 0.0625 m

Max B.M.at point A per meter (Pup*Bfoot)/2*


length of footing M= [(B/2-Bcr)]2) 199.93 KNm
(M / (0.138
Depth of Footing required d= *Fck*Bfoot)) 179.43 mm OKAY
Adopt Effective depth de = 0.2 m
Over all depth dall = 0.3 m
Area of Total steel required TAst,req = M / (j *st*de)) 4797.25 mm2
Area of steel required Ast,req = 87% of TAst,req 4173.61 mm2
Calculation of Main Bars
bar dia provided bar = 16 mm
Abar = bar
2
/4 201.06 mm2
No of bar required Nbar = Abar,req / Abar +1 21
No of bar provided 21
Total Area of steel TAst = Nbar * Abar 4222.31 mm2 OKAY
Spacing required 1000* Lfoot / (Nbar -1)
250.00 mm c/c
Spacing provided Sp = 250.00
Provide 21 no of 16 mm dia bar @ 250 mm spacing.
sectional area of Footing / m Asect = 300000 mm2/m
area of Distribution bar required Abar,req = 450 mm2/m
0.15% of
sectional area
bar dia provided bar = 8 mm

M - 20
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Pier
Abar = bar2/4 50.27 mm2

M - 21
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Pier
No of bar required Nbar = Abar,req / Abar +1 9
No of bar provided 9
Total Area of steel TAst = Nbar * Abar 452.39 mm2 OKAY
Spacing required 1000* Bfoot / (Nbar -1)
281.00 mm c/c
250.00 mm c/c
Provide 9 no of 8 mm dia bar @ 250 mm spacing.

Shear Force at A (critical shear (Pup*Bfoot)*[(Bfoot/


1-way) F1 = 2-Bcr)-de] 26.12 KN
SF at face of wall F2 = Pup*(Bfoot-B) / 2 13.46 KN
max F= maximum 26.12 KN
Bond stress at face of wall F/(jd*Nbar*(perimeterbar) 0.14 N/mm2
SAFE in 1 way Shear
The diagonal tension will be
tested at a point B, (half of
effective depth) away from the
face of the wall de / 2 = 0.1 m
VP=up*[Afoot-(Bfoot+de) ]
2
SF at that point B will be 148.7 KN
Effective depth at that point de = 0.3 m
Shear stress at point B V / (de*j) 0.55 N/mm2
SAFE in 2 way shear
0.25

1.125 Vert Provide 16 no of 16 mm dia bar @


250 mm spacingon both faces.
0.0625 Stirrups Provide 32 no of 8 mm dia. bar
0.9

Provide 21 no of 16 mm dia bar @


1 A Main bar 250 mm spacing.

Provide 9 no of 8 mm dia bar @


B Distributio 250 mm spacing.

0.3 0.3
0.1
2.25
Pier

M - 22
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Breast Wall
Strength of Steel st = 230 KN/m2
Characteristic Strength Fck= 20 N/mm2
Unit weight of Water w = 9.81 KN/m3 A
Unit weight of concrete c = 25 KN/m 3 RLBW,t 146.50
Lever Arm for M20 j= 0.906 HFL 145.67 0.50 FB
k= 0.138
Bond stress for 1:1.5:3 (M20) 7.848 N/mm2
Shear stress 1.6 N/mm2 HDW 4.78
Height of water Hw = 3.60 m Hw 3.95 4.10 HBW
Height of Breast wall HBW = 4.10 m 3.60 Hw
Thickness of Breast Wall tbw = 0.2 m
width of breast wall Lbw = 0.10 m RLBW,b 142.08
0.35 x
RLfl 141.73
Design of Stem (the vertical wall)
Horizontal bar required (min
0.5% of sectional area) 0.5 %
Abar,req = 4098.69892 mm2
calculation of one face 50% 2049.34946 mm2
Provide bar dia bar = 16 mm
Abar = bar2/4 201.07 mm2
Abar,req,us / Abar
No of bar required Nbar,req = +1 11
No of bar provided Nbar = 11
Area of Steel Provided TAst = Nbar * Abar 2211.77 mm2 Reinforcement is Adequate
spacing required L / (Nbar -1) 409.87 mm c/c
Provide spacing 250.00 mm c/c
Provide 11 no of 16 mm dia bar @ 250 mm spacingon both faces.

Vertical bars
Area Required 25%of Ast = 1024.67473 mm2
Bar dia bar = 10 mm
Abar = bar2/4 78.54 mm2

No of bar required Nbar,req = Abar,req / Abar +1 14


No of bar provided Nbar = 14
Area of Steel Provided TAst = Nbar * Abar 1099.56 mm2 Reinforcement is Adequate
spacing required 1000*H / (Nbar -1) 7.69 mm c/c
Provide spacing at 0.00 mm c/c
Provide 14 no of 10 mm dia. bar

Check for Shear


Water Pressure Pw = w Hw3/6 = 63.523 KN/m

N - 23
Force of Water (critical) Fw = w Hw2/2 = 76.200 KN
Bond stress at face of wall Fw/(j*tbw*Nbar*(perimeterbar) 0.63 N/mm2 SAFE in 1 way Shear

N - 24
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Retaining wall


Cantilever Type Retaining Wall - for Abutment wall Type-A ( U/S)
Design Constants
angle of internal friction= f 30 deg. . Cosf= 0.866
Unit weight of soil = g= 19 KN/m 3

Coefficient of friction= m= 0.45


For M20 Concrete and Fe 415 steel reinforcement
cbc = 7 N/mm2
st = 230 N/mm2
m = 13
k = 0.289
j = 0.906
R = 0.914
Wt.of RCC (w) = 25.00 KN
Allowable bearing pressure of foundation soil, q o = 25 t/m2
Depth of Foundation
The minimum depth of foundation, ymin = qo /* {(1-Sin)/(1+Sin)}2
= 1.46 m
Adopt, depth of foundation = 1.50 m
Stability Considerations:
Preliminary sizes of the components of the wall are as follows:
Height above foundation , H = 6.28 m
Base Slab thickness bt = 0.55 m
Height of wall, h = 5.73 m 146.50
Base Slab width b= 0.6h = 3.40 m
Ratio of toe projection to base slab, = 0.35
Toe projection, a = 1.10
stem tw = 0.20 m h= 5.73
stem bw = 0.60 m

141.73 140.78

140.23

tw= 0.20

L
2.10

H= 6.28
5.73
124.6
Bed Level 141.73 w1= 57.25 w3= 206.67 2.092
a= 1.10
1.50 bt= 0.55 bw= 0.60

b= 3.40
O w2= 46.75

O(a) 25
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Retaining wall


Cantilever Type Retaining Wall - for Abutment wall Type-A ( U/S)
Earth pressure acts over the de H 6.28 m
Consider 1 m length of the retaining wall.
Weight of stem w1=
Rectangular= 28.63
Triangular= 28.63
w1= 57.25 KN
Distance of its line of action from O is X 1=a+cg of stem= 2.86
9.542
12.404 Kn-m
Line of action from outer face of stem= 0.217 m
Toe length= 1.10 m X1= 1.317 m
Weight of base w2= b*bt*w w2= 46.75 KN
Distance of its line of action from O is X 2=1/2 of base width of slab X2= 1.7 m
Weight of the soil over the heel ws=
area 1= 1.145
area 2= 9.733 1 2
5.73
10.878 m2
w3= 206.7 KN 0.40 1.70
Distance of its line of action from O = X 3 1.146
X 3= 2.446 m w3= 206.7 KN
Coefficient of active earth pressure = Ka
Ka= 0.333
Active earth pressure Pa = 1/2 Ka g H'2
Pa= 124.56 KN
This acts at a point 1/3 of 6.275 m above the base.
i.e. 2.092 m from base of slab.
Overturning moments due to dead load effects are:
Mod= Pa* line of action ht. = 260.55 KN-m
There is no live load on the back fill
P s= 0
Mos= 0
Restoring moment is
Mr = w1*X1+ w2*X2+w3*X3
Mr = 660.48 KN-m
Now, 1.2 Mod + 1.4 Mos= 312.66 KN-m
Mr > 1.2 Mod + 1.4 Mos
Restoring moment is fo 2.53 times greater than overturning moment.
Hence, the structure is safe against overturning.
Sliding force:
Fs= Pa + Ps
Fs= 124.56 KN
Coefficient of passive earth pressure Kp
Kp= (1+ sinf)/(1-sinf)
Kp= 3.0

Restoring force is
Fr= m * (w1+w2+w3+Pv) + 1/2 Kp g h2
Fr= 203.9 KN

O(a) 26
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Retaining wall


Cantilever Type Retaining Wall - for Abutment wall Type-A ( U/S)
Hence, Fr / Fs= 1.64 > 1.50
The retaining wall is safe in sliding.

Total vertical force is give by R


R= w1+w2+w3 = 310.67 KN
Distance from O of the point where the resultant strikes the base is X -
X-= (w1X1+w2X2+w3X3-PaH/3)/R
X-= 1.287 m from O
Eccentricity of the force from the centre of the base = e
e= 1/2 of base - X-
e= 0.413 m towards the point O
Pressure distribution below the base is as follows:
At the toe
q1= R/A+ R.e/Z
A= B*1
Z= 1/6*B2
q1= 157.92 KN/m2
At the heel
q2= R/A-R.e/Z
q2= 24.827 KN/m2
Since q1 is less than the allowable bearing pressure on soil, the structure is safe against subsidence.

Net upward or downward pressure on the base


The factored pressure below the base will be as follows:
At the toe= 1.5 q1= 236.882 KN/m2
At the heel= 1.5 q2= 37.2403 KN/m2
Corresponding Pressure distribution is as shown below

1.1 0.60 1.70

A B C D

37.24031
236.88
137.0614
172.2924
a. Pressure distribution below the base

122.525 122.5
13.75 13.75
b. Load intensity from above

-14.5 85.28
223.13 158.54

O(a) 27
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Retaining wall


Cantilever Type Retaining Wall - for Abutment wall Type-A ( U/S)

c. Resultant load intensity on the base slab

Load intensity on the base due to self weight of base and the earth
above is as follows:
At point A= 13.75 KN/m2
At point B= 13.75 KN/m2
At point C= 122.53 KN/m2
At point D= 122.53 KN/m2

Design of heel slab:


Load acting on heel slab
Weight of soil acting on heel sla= 184.92 KN acting at 0.85 m from C
Weight of heel slab = 23.38 KN acting at 0.85 m from C
Total upward soil reaction = 60.14 KN acting at 0.45 m from C
Total shear force at C S.F. = 148.16 KN
BM at C BM = 149.973 KN-m
Effective depth required d = (B.M/1000j)
d = 405.07 mm
Adopt d = 500.00 mm with 50 mm cover

Tension reinforcement
Ast = Mu/(t*j*d)
= 1439 mm2
Use 16 mm f bar, area= 201.06 mm2
Nos of bars required = 7.16 say 8 Nos
Hence provide 16 mm f bar @ 120 mm c/c at top of slab.
Actual reinforcement provided 1676 mm2
Distribution Reinforcement
Area of distribution reinforcemen0.12% of cross sectional area
= 600 mm2
Use 12 mm f bar, area= 113.10 mm2
Nos of bars required = 5.31 say 6 Nos
Hence provide 12 mm f bar @ 160 mm c/c
Actual reinforcement provided 707 mm2
Design of Toe Slab:
The toe slab bends as a cantilever due to net upward pressure as shown in
resultant load intensity on the base slab diagram.
BM a B BM = 121.97 KN-m
Effective depth required, d = (B.M/1000j)
d = 366.91 mm
Adopt d = 500.00 mm with 50 mm cover

Tension reinforcement
Ast = Mu/(t*j*d)
= 1171 mm2
Use 16 mm f bar, area= 201.06 mm2
Nos of bars required = 5.82 say 6 Nos
Hence provide 16 mm f bar @ 160 mm c/c at bottom of slab.
Actual reinforcement provided 1257 mm2

O(a) 28
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Retaining wall


Cantilever Type Retaining Wall - for Abutment wall Type-A ( U/S)
Distribution Reinforcement
Area of distribution reinforcemen0.12% of cross sectional area
= 600 mm2
Use 12 mm f bar, area= 113.10 mm2
Nos of bars required = 5.31 say 6 Nos
Hence provide 12 mm f bar @ 160 mm c/c
Actual reinforcement provided 707 mm2
Design of Stem:
Clear height of stem above the base slab= 5.73 m
Only the horizontal component of the earth pressure will cause bending moment in the stem.
Mu= /6*Ka g h
1 3
Bending moment at the base of the stem = 197.87 KN-m
Effective depth for balanced section, d = (Mu/(1000*j)) = 467 mm
Keep d = 550 mm with clear cover 50mm at bottom. Reduce the total thickness to 200
mm at the top.
Overall thickness of the stem at bottom= 600 mm.
Overall thickness of the stem at top = 200 mm.
Tension Reinforcement
Ast= Mu/(t*j*d)= 1726.45 mm2/m
Use 16 mm f bar, area= 201.06 mm2
Nos of bars required = 8.59 say 9 Nos
Hence provide 16 mm f bar @ 110 mm c/c
Actual reinforcement provided 1828 mm2
Curtailment of alternate main bar
Alternate bar shall be curtailed at a height 2.80 m above base slab.
Distribution Reinforcement
Average thickness of stem = 400 mm
Area of distribution reinforcemen0.12% of cross sectional area
= 480 mm2
Use 12 mm f bar, area= 113.10 mm2
Nos of bars required = 4.24 say 5 Nos
Hence provide 12 mm f bar @ 200 mm c/c
Actual reinforcement provided 565 mm2

Critical section for shear occurs at the face where stem meets the base.
Shear force at this section is
Vu =1/2*Ka*g * h2
Vu= 103.69 KN
tv= 0.189 N/mm2
tc= 0.24 N/mm2
t v < t c, OK
Temperature and shrinkage reinforcement
Provide 10 mm f bar @ 200 mm c/c bothways on outer face.

O(a) 29
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Retaining wall


Cantilever Type Retaining Wall - for Abutment wall Type-B ( D/S Dam & Undersluice)
Design Constants
angle of internal friction= f 30 deg. . Cosf= 0.866
Unit weight of soil = g= 19 KN/m3
Coefficient of friction= m= 0.45
For M20 Concrete and Fe 415 steel reinforcement
cbc = 7 N/mm2
st = 230 N/mm2
m = 13
k = 0.289
j = 0.906
R = 0.914
Wt.of RCC (w) = 25 KN
Allowable bearing pressure of foundation soil, q o = 25 t/m2
Depth of Foundation
The minimum depth of foundation, ymin = qo /* {(1-Sin)/(1+Sin)}2
= 1.46 m
Adopt, depth of foundation = 1.50 m
Stability Considerations:
Preliminary sizes of the components of the wall are as follows:
Height above foundation , H = 9.93 m
Base Slab thickness bt = 0.85 m
Height of wall, h = 9.08 m 146.50
Base Slab width b= 0.65h = 5.90 m
Ratio of toe projection to base slab, = 0.35
Toe projection, a = 2.00
stem tw = 0.20 m h= 9.08
stem bw = 1.05 m
138.07
137.42

136.57

tw= 0.20

L
3.70

H= 9.93
9.080
311.9
DS Bed Level 138.1 w1= 141.88 w3= 565 3.310
a= 2.00
1.50 bt= 0.85 bw= 1.05

b= 5.90
O w2= 125.38
Earth pressure acts over the depth H 9.93 m
Consider 1 m length of the retaining wall.
Weight of stem w1=
Rectangular= 45.40
Triangular= 96.48
w1= 141.88 KN
Distance of its line of action from O is X 1=a+cg of stem= 4.54
O(b) 30
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Retaining wall


Cantilever Type Retaining Wall - for Abutment wall Type-B ( D/S Dam & Undersluice)
46.630
51.170 Kn-m

O(b) 31
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Retaining wall


Cantilever Type Retaining Wall - for Abutment wall Type-B ( D/S Dam & Undersluice)
Line of action from outer face of stem= 0.361 m
Toe length= 2.00 m X1= 2.361 m
Weight of base w2= b*bt*w w2=
125.38 KN
Distance of its line of action from O is X 2=1/2 of base width of slab X2= 2.95 m
Weight of the soil over the heel ws=
area 1= 3.859
area 2= 25.878 1 2
9.08
29.737 m2
w3= 565.0 KN 0.85 2.85
Distance of its line of action from O = X 3 2.053
X 3= 4.253 m w3= 565.0 KN
Coefficient of active earth pressure = Ka
Ka= 0.333
Active earth pressure Pa = 1/2 Ka g H'2
Pa=
311.94 KN
This acts at a point 1/3 of 9.930 m above the base.
i.e. 3.310 m from base of slab.
Overturning moments due to dead load effects are:
Mod= Pa* line of action ht. = 1032.51 KN-m
There is no live load on the back fill
Ps= 0
Mos= 0
Restoring moment is
Mr = w1*X1+ w2*X2+w3*X3
Mr = 3107.91 KN-m
Now, 1.2 Mod + 1.4 Mos= 1239.01 KN-m
Mr > 1.2 Mod + 1.4 Mos
Restoring moment is found 3.01 times greater than overturning moment.
Hence, the structure is safe against overturning.
Sliding force:
Fs= Pa + Ps
Fs= 311.94 KN
Coefficient of passive earth pressure Kp
Kp= (1+ sinf)/(1-sinf)
Kp= 3.0

Restoring force is
Fr= m * (w1+w2+w3+Pv) + 1/2 Kp g h2
Fr= 438.6 KN
Hence, Fr / Fs= 1.41 < 1.50 SAFE

Total vertical force is give by R


R= w1+w2+w3 = 832.25 KN
Distance from O of the point where the resultant strikes the base is X -
X-= (w1X1+w2X2+w3X3-PaH/3)/R
X-= 2.494 m from O
Eccentricity of the force from the centre of the base = e
e= 1/2 of base - X-
e= 0.456 m towards the point O

O(b) 32
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Retaining wall


Cantilever Type Retaining Wall - for Abutment wall Type-B ( D/S Dam & Undersluice)
Pressure distribution below the base is as follows:
At the toe
q1= R/A+ R.e/Z
A= B*1
Z= 1/6*B2
q1= 206.51 KN/m2
At the heel
q2= R/A-R.e/Z
q2=75.605 KN/m2
Since q1 is less than the allowable bearing pressure on soil, the structure is safe against subsidence.

Net upward or downward pressure on the base


The factored pressure below the base will be as follows:
At the toe= 1.5 q1= 309.7725 KN/m2
At the heel= 1.5 q2= 113.407 KN/m2
Corresponding Pressure distribution is as shown below

2 1.05 2.85

A B C D

113.407
309.77
208.26152
243.20791
a. Pressure distribution below the base

193.77 193.8
21.25 21.25
b. Load intensity from above

-14.5 80.36
288.52 221.96

c. Resultant load intensity on the base slab

Load intensity on the base due to self weight of base and the earth
above is as follows:
At point A= 21.25 KN/m2
At point B= 21.25 KN/m2
At point C= 193.77 KN/m2
At point D= 193.77 KN/m2

Design of heel slab:


Load acting on heel slab
Weight of soil acting on heel slab = 491.68 KN acting at 1.43 m from C
Weight of heel slab = 60.56 KN acting at 1.43 m from C
Total upward soil reaction = 93.87 KN acting at 0.74 m from C
Total shear force at C S.F. = 458.38 KN
BM at C BM = 717.393 KN-m
Effective depth required, d = (B.M/1000j)

O(b) 33
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Retaining wall


Cantilever Type Retaining Wall - for Abutment wall Type-B ( D/S Dam & Undersluice)
d = 885.94 mm
Adopt d = 890.00 mm with 50 mm cover

O(b) 34
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Retaining wall


Cantilever Type Retaining Wall - for Abutment wall Type-B ( D/S Dam & Undersluice)
Tension reinforcement
Ast = Mu/(t*j*d)
= 3868 mm2
Use 16 mm f bar, area= 201.06 mm2
Nos of bars required = 19.24 say 20 Nos
Hence provide 16 mm f bar @ 50 mm c/c at top of slab.
Actual reinforcement provided 4021 mm2
Distribution Reinforcement
Area of distribution reinforcement = 0.12% of cross sectional area
= 1068 mm2
Use 12 mm f bar, area= 113.10 mm2
Nos of bars required = 9.44 say 10 Nos
Hence provide 12 mm f bar @ 100 mm c/c
Actual reinforcement provided 1131 mm2
Design of Toe Slab:

The toe slab bends as a cantilever due to net upward pressure as shown in
resultant load intensity on the base slab diagram.
BM a B BM = 532.67 KN-m
Effective depth required, d = (B.M/1000j)
d = 766.77 mm
Adopt d = 800.00 mm with 50 mm cover

Tension reinforcement
Ast = Mu/(t*j*d)
= 3195 mm2
Use 16 mm f bar, area= 201.06 mm2
Nos of bars required = 15.89 say 16 Nos
Hence provide 16 mm f bar @ 60 mm c/c at bottom of slab.
Actual reinforcement provided 3351 mm2
Distribution Reinforcement
Area of distribution reinforcement = 0.12% of cross sectional area
= 960 mm2
Use 12 mm f bar, area= 113.10 mm2
Nos of bars required = 8.49 say 9 Nos
Hence provide 12 mm f bar @ 110 mm c/c
Actual reinforcement provided 1028 mm2

Design of Stem:
Clear height of stem above the base slab= 9.08 m
Only the horizontal component of the earth pressure will cause bending moment in the stem.
Mu= /6*Ka g h
1 3
Bending moment at the base of the stem = 789.41 KN-m
Effective depth for balanced section, d = (Mu/(1000*j))
= 933 mm
Keep d = 1000 mm with clear cover 50mm at bottom. Reduce the total thickness to 200 mm at the top.
Overall thickness of the stem at bottom= 1050 mm.
Overall thickness of the stem at top = 200 mm.
Tension Reinforcement
Ast= Mu/(t*j*d)= 3788.33 mm2/m
Use 16 mm f bar, area= 201.06 mm2
Nos of bars required = 18.84 say 19 Nos
Hence provide 16 mm f bar @ 50 mm c/c
Actual reinforcement provided 4021 mm2
Curtailment of alternate main bar
Alternate bar shall be curtailed at a height 4.00 m above base slab.
O(b) 35
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

Design of Retaining wall


Cantilever Type Retaining Wall - for Abutment wall Type-B ( D/S Dam & Undersluice)
Distribution Reinforcement
Average thickness of stem = 625 mm
Area of distribution reinforcement = 0.12% of cross sectional area
= 750 mm2
Use 12 mm f bar, area= 113.10 mm2
Nos of bars required = 6.63 say 7 Nos
Hence provide 12 mm f bar @ 140 mm c/c
Actual reinforcement provided 808 mm2

Critical section for shear occurs at the face where stem meets the base.
Shear force at this section is
Vu =1/2*Ka*g * h2
Vu= 260.82 KN
t v= 0.261 N/mm2
t c= 0.26 N/mm2
v t
< c , CHECKt
Temperature and shrinkage reinforcement
Provide 10 mm f bar @ 200 mm c/c bothways on outer face.

O(b) 36
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Sliding Gate for Barrage

Unit Weight of Water w = 9.81 KN/m3


Young's modulus of elasticity E= 21000 KN/cm2
m for poisson's ratio (l/m) m= 3
Permissible stress for skinplate stress st= 160.0 N/mm2
Maximum allowable shear shress st= 110.0 N/mm2
Permissible Deflection = 1 in 600.0
Permissible Span /Flange Ratio 40.0
Span of the gate L= 2.45 m
Depth of the gate Hg = 3.78 m
Depth of Water Hw = 3.78 m
Efective span of the gate Le = 2.55 m
Steel Plate
Thickness tp = 7 mm
Steel Angle
Length of long arm La1 = 125 mm
Length of short arm La2 = 95 mm
Thickness ta = 8 mm
Length between horizontal stifners Lhs = 0.34 m

For a plate in tension or compression, the allowable extension of plate, beyond a stifening member is, for calculation purpos
times the efective plate thickiness. This determines the extent of plate supported by the stiferner.
The thickness of skin plate = 7.00 mm
The overall skinplate thickness is 7mm, but 1mm corrosion allowance has been deducted, therefore the efective thickness fo
the calculations is 6mm.
Efective thickness of the skin plate tp = 6.00 mm
Angle used: 125 x 95 X 8 mm
Tension Side
16t 8 16t
= 96 = 96 Lp = 200
t=6 tp = 6.00
125 La1 = 125
La2 = 95
ta = 8
125 x 95 x 8 Angle

Compression Side
Fig: Section of skin plate and angle (All dimensions are in mm)

Lever Lever Arm


Area of Arm x1 = x1-x
Axx
Member section (See Axx/A (see Note
Note1) 2)

A (cm2) xx (cm) (cm3) (cm) yx (cm)


Plate 12 0.3 3.6 5.57 5.27
Angle 16.96 9.3 157.7 3.73

P 37
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Sliding Gate for Barrage
28.96 161.3
Notes: 1. About tension face. INA =
2. About neutral axis.
x1 is the position of the neutral axis from the tension face
position of the neutral axis from the compression face
x2 = tp+La1+x1 7.53 cm
Section modulus ZT = INA/x1 150 cm3
Section modulus ZC = INA/x2 111 cm3

P 38
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Sliding Gate for Barrage
Nomenclature member = No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Position of member @ % of Hg % 0 35 60 66 75 80 87
Depth of members D 0.00 1.32 2.27 2.49 2.84 3.02 3.29
Height diference between
members h= 1.32 0.95 0.22 0.35 0.18 0.27

Height of Water at member level Dw = 0.00 1.32 2.27 2.49 2.84 3.02 3.29
Water pressure on members Pw = 0.00 12.95 22.27 24.43 27.86 29.63 32.27
(KN/m) w*Dw
Ww = 0 21.794 64.452 77.55 100.88 114.076 135.386
Water load on members (KN/m2)
1/2 w*Dw2Le

Asuming, Height of Area on which


the water load acts is half of upper
and lower pannels hp = 0 1.795 0.585 0.285 0.265 0.225 0.19
Wp = 0 39.121 37.705 22.102 26.734 25.668 25.724
Water load on pannel (KN)
hp*Ww
Bending Moment of Steel Angle BM = 0 12.47 12.019 7.046 8.522 8.182 8.2
(KN.m) WpLe /8
Section modulus (cm3) ZT = 150
Section modulus (cm3) ZC = 111
fbt = 0 83.134 80.127 46.974 56.814 54.547 54.667
Tensile stress (N/mm2)
BM/ZT
fbc = 0 112.343 108.28 63.478 76.775 73.712 73.874
Compressive stress (N/mm2)
BM/ZC SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE
Le / La2 26.84
Span /Flange Ratio
SAFE
= 0 0.481 0.463 0.272 0.329 0.316 0.316
Deflection
5WpLe3/384 EINA
0.425
Permissible Deflection (mm)
SAFE Use angle oUse angle SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE
Shear on members at support fq = 0 39.121 37.705 22.102 26.734 25.668 25.724
(N/mm2) Wp/(La1*ta) SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE
k= 1 0.002 0.103 0.67 0.731 0.84 0.912
[Lhs /(Lhs + hp )]
4 4 4

kmin = 0.7
minimum permissible value of k=
Ignore Ignore Ignore Design Design Design
Stress on the middle of pannel fb = 0.002 0.032 0.059 0.072 0.068 0.062
section (N/mm2) WwkHp2/2ts2 SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE
Deflection (mm) = 0.476126 0.20992 0.2227 0.15039 0.098539
(m - 1)/m x kpB4/32Et3
2 2

0.10 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03


Permissible Deflection (mm)
SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE

P 39
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Sliding Gate for Barrage
Step 1: Calculate water load on the gate
Step 2: Position horizontal gate members
Step 3: Calculate load on members
lculate the load carried by members
Step 4: Calculate the section properties of section at (1) and check stress and deflection
Step 5: Check the shear
Step 6: Calculate bending stress and deflection in panel 1 of the skinplate

Using Pounder's fourmula for rectangular plates with a distributed load,


continuous on four sides (as the skinplate is welded to the horizontal and
vertical members).

fb = pkB2/2t2 [1 + 11(1-k)/35 + 79 (1-k)2/141 ]


= (m2 - 1)/m2 x kpB4/32Et3 x [1 + 47(1-k)/210 + 200(1-k)2/517]
when k exceeds 0.75 then the
figures in the square brackets are
small and may be ignored.
where, L = length of plate in mm
B = breadth of plate in mm
t = thickness of plate in mm
k = [L4/(L4 + B4)]
f = allowable skinplate stress
p = pressure on skinplate
E = 2.1 x 105 N/mm2
I/m = Poisson's ratio ( m is taken as 3.0)
d = deflection in mm
34cm
Fig: Horizontal and vertical stifeners
From the above figure, it can be seen that two vertical stifeners are welded to the skinplate and horizontal members to tran
vertical rections of the operating spindles into the gate leaf. The distance between the vertical stiferners becomes the panel
"L".
Step 7: Calculate lifting force on operating gear
Weight of gate leaf No L B H Unit Weight
(a) Skinplate = 1 2.55 3.78 62.8 Kg/m2 = 605 kg
(b) Horiz. memb = 9 2.55 13.4 Kg/m = 308 kg
(c) Side memb = 2 3.78 10.6 Kg/m = 80 kg
(d) Vert. stifeners = 6 3.78 7.5 Kg/m = 170 kg
(e) Sealing faces = 2 3.78 3.9 Kg/m = 29 kg
Total 1192 Kg
Diameter of operating spindle = 30.00 mm

Length of the operating spindle = 2.50 m


Weight of operating spindle = 2.50 x 5.55 Kg/m = 14 Kg
Type of sealing material used = Rubber
Coefficient of friction for steel on
rubber = 1.00

Average water pressure on seal = x H x g 18540.90 N/m2


Load on seal = Pressu 2102.54 N
P 40
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Sliding Gate for Barrage
Force = 2102.54 x 2 / 5 = 1880.57 N
Number of seals = 2 (one on each side)
Friction force = 1880.57 x 2 x 1 = 3761.14 N
376 Kg
Force on operating gear
= Wt. of gate leaf + spindle + Friction force
= 1192 + 14 + 376 = 1582 Kg
No og Gates = 3.00 no
Total weight of gates 4,746.00 kg

P 41
calculation purposes, 16

ective thickness for use in

mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

I about
Ayx2 N.A.

(cm4) (cm4)
333 0
236 268.3

P 42
569 268.3
837.3 cm4

P 43
8 9
90 100
3.40 3.78

0.11 0.38

3.40 3.78
33.35 37.08

144.59 178.72

0.245 0.19
35.425 33.957

11.292 10.824

75.28 72.16

101.73 97.514
SAFE SAFE

0.435 0.417

Use anglSAFE
35.425 33.957
SAFE SAFE
0.788 0.912

Design Design
0.095 0.082
SAFE SAFE
0.2514 0.1301

0.04 0.03
SAFE SAFE

P 44
members to transfer the
ecomes the panel length

P 45
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Sliding Gate for Canal Head Regulator

Unit Weight of Water w = 9.81 KN/m3


Young's modulus of elasticity E= 21000 KN/cm2
m for poisson's ratio (l/m) m= 3
Permissible stress for skinplate stress st= 160.0 N/mm2
Maximum allowable shear shress st= 110.0 N/mm2
Permissible Deflection = 1 in 600.0
Permissible Span /Flange Ratio 40.0
Span of the gate L= 1.50 m
Depth of the gate Hg = 0.45 m
Depth of Water Hw = 0.35 m
Efective span of the gate Le = 1.60 m
Steel Plate
Thickness tp = 7 mm
Steel Angle
Length of long arm La1 = 125 mm
Length of short arm La2 = 95 mm
Thickness ta = 8 mm
Length between horizontal stifners Lhs = 0.34 m

For a plate in tension or compression, the allowable extension of plate, beyond a stifening member is, for calculation purpos
times the efective plate thickiness. This determines the extent of plate supported by the stiferner.
The thickness of skin plate = 7.00 mm
The overall skinplate thickness is 7mm, but 1mm corrosion allowance has been deducted, therefore the efective thickness fo
in the calculations is 6mm.
Efective thickness of the skin plate tp = 6.00 mm
Angle used: 125 x 95 X 8 mm
Tension Side
16t 8 16t
= 96 = 96 Lp = 200
t=6 tp = 6.00

125 La1 = 125


La2 = 95
ta = 8
125 x 95 x 8 Angle

Compression Side
Fig: Section of skin plate and angle (All dimensions are in mm)
Lever Lever Arm
Area of Arm x1 = x1-x
Axx
Member section (See Axx/A (see Note
Note1) 2)

A (cm2) xx (cm) (cm3) (cm) yx (cm)


Plate 12 0.3 3.6 5.57 5.27

R 46
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Sliding Gate for Canal Head Regulator
Angle 16.96 9.3 157.7 3.73
28.96 161.3
Notes: 1. About tension face. INA =
2. About neutral axis.
x1 is the position of the neutral axis from the tension face
position of the neutral axis from the compression face
x2 = tp+La1+x1 7.53 cm
Section modulus ZT = INA/x1 150 cm3
Section modulus ZC = INA/x2 111 cm3

R 47
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Sliding Gate for Canal Head Regulator
Nomenclature member = No 1 2 3

Position of member @ % of Hg % 0 50 100


Depth of members D 0.00 0.23 0.45
Height diference between
members h= 0.23 0.22
Height of Water at member
level Dw = 0.00 0.13 0.35
Water pressure on members Pw = 0.00 1.28 3.43
(KN/m) w*Dw
Water load on members Ww = 0 0.133 0.962
(KN/m2) 1/2 w*Dw Le
2

Asuming, Height of Area on


which the water load acts is
half of upper and lower
pannels hp = 0 0.34 0.11
Wp = 0 0.046 0.106
Water load on pannel (KN)
hp*Ww
Bending Moment of Steel BM = 0 0.01 0.022
Angle (KN.m) WpLe /8
Section modulus (cm3) ZT = 150
Section modulus (cm3) ZC = 111
fbt = 0 0.067 0.147
Tensile stress (N/mm2)
BM/ZT
fbc = 0 0.091 0.199
Compressive stress (N/mm2)
BM/ZC SAFE SAFE SAFE
Le / La2 16.842
Span /Flange Ratio
SAFE
= 0 0.001 0.001
Deflection
5WpLe3/384 EINA
0.2667
Permissible Deflection (mm)
SAFE SAFE SAFE
Shear on members at support fq = 0 0.046 0.106
(N/mm2) Wp/(La1*ta) SAFE SAFE SAFE
k= 1 0.5 0.99
[Lhs4/(Lhs4 + hp4)]
minimum permissible value of kmin = 0.7
k= Ignore
Stress on the middle of pannel fb = 0.001 0.001
section (N/mm2) WwkHp2/2ts2 SAFE
Deflection (mm) = 8.54E-05
(m2 - 1)/m2 x kpB4/32Et3
-0.0009
Permissible Deflection (mm)
R 48
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Sliding Gate for Canal Head Regulator
Permissible Deflection (mm)
SAFE

R 49
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Sliding Gate for Canal Head Regulator
Step 1: Calculate water load on the gate
Step 2: Position horizontal gate members
Step 3: Calculate load on members
te the load carried by members
Step 4: Calculate the section properties of section at (1) and check stress and deflection
Step 5: Check the shear
Step 6: Calculate bending stress and deflection in panel 1 of the skinplate

Using Pounder's fourmula for rectangular plates with a distributed load,


continuous on four sides (as the skinplate is welded to the horizontal and
vertical members).

fb = pkB2/2t2 [1 + 11(1-k)/35 + 79 (1-k)2/141 ]


= (m2 - 1)/m2 x kpB4/32Et3 x [1 + 47(1-k)/210 + 200(1-k)2/517]
when k exceeds 0.75 then the
figures in the square brackets
are small and may be ignored.
where, L = length of plate in mm
B = breadth of plate in mm
t = thickness of plate in mm
k = [L4/(L4 + B4)]
f = allowable skinplate stress
p = pressure on skinplate
E = 2.1 x 105 N/mm2
I/m = Poisson's ratio ( m is taken as 3.0)
d = deflection in mm
34cm
Fig: Horizontal and vertical stifeners
From the above figure, it can be seen that two vertical stifeners are welded to the skinplate and horizontal members to trans
vertical rections of the operating spindles into the gate leaf. The distance between the vertical stiferners becomes the panel
"L".
Step 7: Calculate lifting force on operating gear
Weight of gate leaf No L B H Unit Weight
(a) Skinplate = 1 1.60 0.45 62.8 Kg/m2 = 45 kg
(b) Horiz. memb = 3 1.60 13.4 Kg/m = 64 kg
(c) Side memb = 2 0.45 10.6 Kg/m = 10 kg
(d) Vert. stifeners = 3 0.45 7.5 Kg/m = 10 kg
(e) Sealing faces = 2 0.45 3.9 Kg/m = 4 kg
Total 133 Kg
Diameter of operating spindle = 30.00 mm
Length of the operating spindle = 1.70 m
Weight of operating spindle = 1.70 x 5.55 Kg/m = 9 Kg
Type of sealing material used = Rubber
Coefficient of friction for steel 1.00
Average water pressure on seal x H x g 1716.75 N/m2
Load on seal = Pressur 23.18 N
Force = 23.18 x 2 / 5 = 20.73 N
Number of seals = 2 (one on each side)
R 50
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Design of Sliding Gate for Canal Head Regulator
Friction force = 20.73 x 2 x 1 = 41.46 N
4 Kg
Force on operating gear
= Wt. of gate leaf + spindle + Friction force
= 133 + 9 + 4 = 146 Kg

R 51
alculation purposes, 16

ective thickness for use

mm
mm

mm
mm
mm

I about
Ayx2 N.A.

(cm4) (cm4)
333 0

R 52
236 268.3
569 268.3
837.3 cm4

R 53
members to transfer the
ecomes the panel length

R 54
Design of Village Road Bridge (VRB)
Design Data
Number of barrels n : 2
Size of Barrels
Width w : 2.6 m
Height H : 0.50 m
Unit wt of dry earth d : 1.6 t/m2
Unit wt of saturated earth sat : 2 t/m2
Weight of submerged earth sub : 1 t/m2
Angle of internal friction of soil : 30 deg 0.523333 rad
Unit weight of RCC c : 2.5 t/m3
Active earth pressure coefficientCp=1-sin/1+sin : 0.334
Strength of Steel st = : 230 N/mm2
Strength of Concrete (M15) cb = : 5 N/mm2

Design
(1) Critical section of the barrel
5.8 0.2
0.2

0.5

0.2

2.6
(2)Design features
Following considerations have been made in the design of barrel:
(i) Bottom slab:
Uplift pressure
Reaction from soil resulting from the loading on the foundation
(ii) Side walls:
High flood in the drain while barrels are empty
No water in the drain while barrels are full
(iii) Partition walls
Nominal reinforcement is provided
(iV)Top Slab
Earth load
Weight of water below saturation line
(v)Traffic load
As there is no roadway along the drain ,no LL due to traffic is considered

V 55
Design of Village Road Bridge (VRB)
Designs
As the barrels are rigidly joined , they should be designed as a continuous structure.Hardy Cross
method of moment distribution is used for design.
Adopt the thickness of the frame throughout t 0.2 m
Efective length for horizont member Lh 2.8 m
Efective length for vertical member Lv 0.7 m
Distribution factor at joint A
For member AB 0.2 A B
For member AD 0.8
At joint D 0.7
For member DA 0.8
For member DC 0.2 D C
2.8
Load considerations
(i)DL
Consider one meter length of barrel
Depth of dry earth over barrel 0.70 m
Weight of dry and saturated earth 1.12 t/m2
Weight of top slab 0.50 t/m2
Weight on the top slab including its own weight 1.62 t/m2
Weight of barrel 6.65 t/m
Weight of Parapet 2.00
Total dead load 18.05 t/m
Live load due to vehicle 5.00 t/m
Net vertical load acting on foundation 23.05 t/m
Pressure on foundation soil 3.97 t/m2
Pressure acting on the base slab=soil reaction+Uplift 3.97 t/m2
Net upward pressure on the base slab 3.97 t/m2
(ii)Earth pressure
The earth pressure comprise the following
Dry earth pressure above saturation line For point A For Point D
hd= 0.5 1.2
6.62 t/m2
5.6 t/m2 5.6 t/m2
A B

0.7
2.8

D C
5.98 t/m2 5.98 t/m2
3.97 t/m2

Pressure at point A=Surcharge due to dry earth+Surcharge due to saturated earth


= Cpxdxhd+Cpxsatxhsat+subxhsub 5.6 t/m2
Pressure at point D 5.98 t/m2

V 56
Design of Village Road Bridge (VRB)

(iii) Fix end Moments


On span AB=WL^2/12 4.33 tm
On span CD=WL^2/12 2.59 tm
on span AD=WL^2/12(due to rectangular portion) 0.23 tm
Fix end moments due to triangular load
MAD =WL^2/30 0.01 tm
MDA=WL^2/20 0.01 tm
Total fixed end moment at A 0.24 tm
Total fixed end moment at D 0.24 tm
(iv) Distribution of moments

Joints C D A B
Distribution factors 0.2 0.8 0.8 0.2
Fixed end Moments -2.59 2.59 -0.24 0.24 -4.33 4.33
Balance -0.47 -1.88 3.272 0.818
Carry over -0.235 1.636 -0.94 0.409
Balance -0.3272 -1.3088 0.752 0.188
Carry over -0.1636 0.376 -0.6544 0.094
Balance -0.0752 -0.3008 0.52352 0.13088
Carry over -0.0376 0.26176 -0.1504 0.06544
Balance -0.052352 -0.209408 0.12032 0.03008
Carry over -0.026176 0.06016 -0.104704 0.01504
Balance -0.012032 -0.048128 0.0837632 0.0209408
Carry over
Total -3.052 1.653 -1.653 3.142 -3.142 4.913

(V)Net moments at center and face


Span AB
Hogging moment at face 0.894 tm
Fixing moment at face 4.85 tm
Net Fixing moment at face 3.956 tm
Sagging (moment causing tension in water face)moment at center 6.488 tm
Fixing moment at center 4.0275 tm
Net Fixing moment at center 2.4605 tm
Span CD
Hogging moment at face 0.536 tm
Fixing moment at face 3.002 tm
Net Fixing moment at face 2.466 tm
Sagging (moment causing tension in water face)moment at center 3.891 tm
Fixing moment at center 2.353 tm
Net Fixing moment at center 1.538 tm

V 57
Design of Village Road Bridge (VRB)
Span AD
Hogging moment at face
(a) Due to rectangular portion 0.196 tm
(b) Due to triangular portion 0.004 tm
Total sagging moment at face 0.2 tm
Fixing moment at face 1.866 tm
Net Fixing moment 1.666 tm
Sagging (moment causing tension in water face)moment at center
(a) Due to rectangular portion 0.343 tm
(b) Due to triangular portion 0.012 tm
Total sagging moment at center 0.355 tm
Fixing moment at center 2.3975 tm
Net Fixing moment at center -2.0425 tm
The net moments at face and center of the diferent spans are tabulated below:
Moments tm
Span At face At center
AB 3.956 (hogging) 2.4605 (Sagging)
CD 2.466 (hogging) 1.538 (Sagging)
AD 1.666 (hogging) -2.0425 (Sagging)
(vi) Thickness of members
The maximum moment in the barrel is 3.956 tm 39560 Nm
The minimum efective thickness (d) required for BM
d = (M/(bK))^.5
184 mm
Adopt 375 mm efective
400 mm overall
The reinforcement required at various points
Area of steel Asts = Ms/(stxjxds)
Actual
Adopt
Reinforcement spacing Area of
Description Moments in Nm Bar dia mm spacing Steel(m
required mm mm c/c
m2)

Span AB
At face 39560 (hogging) 287 mm2 12 394 300 377.14
At center 24605 (Sagging) 195 mm2 12 580 500 226.29

Span CD
At face 24660 (hogging) 277 mm2 12 408 300 377.14
At center 15380 (Sagging) 189 mm2 12 598 500 226.29

Span AD and BC
At face 16660 (hogging) 153 mm2 12 739 300 377.14
At center -20425 (Sagging) -21 m2 12 5383 500 226.29

0.15% of area of concrete 600 mm2/m


Provide bar dia 10 mm at 130.00 mm C/C

V 58
Design of Village Road Bridge (VRB)

Section VRB Barrel


12 mm @ 300 mm c/c

12 mm @ 500 mm c/c
5.8 0.2 12 mm @ 300.00 mm c/c
0.2

12 mm @ 300 mm c/c
12
mm @ 12 mm @ 500 mm c/c
500
mm c/c 0.5
12
mm @
300
mm c/c
0.2
0.1
6.41
mm at mm at
12 base@ 300 mm c/c 12 base top@ 500 mm c/c

V 5
Design of V.R.B.(5 m span)

Road width = 5.0 m


Water depth = 0.20 m
Free board = 0.30 m
Clear Span = 1.50 m
Effective span = 2.00 m

Effective span 2 m to knife edge moving at 1140 kg/m width of the road way including impact

Assume overall thickness of the slab = 0.20 m


Load distributed per m of the slab = 5.00 KN/m
Maximun bending moment due to distributed lo = 2.50 KN-m
Maximun bending moment due to knife edge lo = 25 KN-m
Total bending moment = 27.50 KN-m
Maximun shear force occurs at the edge of the support
SF due to dead load at the edge of the support = 5.00
SF due to kinfe edge load for the worst conditio = 11.40 KN
Total SF 16.40 KN
Depth of slab required
Mu = 0.36*fck*Xu/d*(1-.42Xu/d)bd2
Then, d= 115.28 mm
Provide overall depth 20cm of slab including 25 mm cover

Maximun shear stress = 99.39 KN/m2


= 0.10 N/mm2 less than 0.44 N/mm2 ,safe
t c= 0.44 N/mm
2

Area of steel required


Mu= 0.87 fy*d(1-0.42Xu/d)*Ast
Xu= 0.87 fy*Ast/(0.36fck*b)
Then
0.0210613 Ast2 - 59573.25 Ast+ 27500000 =0
1 Ast2 - 2828571.4 Ast+ 1305715472.73 =0
Ast 2828109.7
461.69194
Ast= 461.69 mm2
Provide 12 mm dia. bar with cross section area= 113.04 mm2
No of bar required = 5 spacing= 200.00 mm c/c
Provide 12 mm dia bar @ 200 mm c/c
Top Bars
Area of steel required = 50% of Ast on bottom s 230.85 mm2
Provide 10 mm dia. bar with cross section area= 78.5 mm2
No of bar required = 4 spacing= 250.00 mm c/c
Provide10 mm dia bar @ 500 c/c
Transverse Reinforcement
Provide 0.15 % of gross concrete area i.e Ast= 300 mm2 per m width of slab
Use 10 mm bar of area = 78.5 mm2
No of bar required= 4 Spacing= 250 mm c/c
Use10 mm dia bar @ 250 mm C/C

10 mm dia top bar @ 250 mm c/c


12 mm dia main bar @ 200 mm c/c
10 mm dia distribution bar @ 250 mm c/c

0.2 m

1.50 m
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Hire Charges (NRs./md ) Materials Cost :
Unskilled Labour 350.00 S.N. 5, pg.1 Cement NRs. 625.00 Per bag
Skilled Labour 500.00 S.N. 2, pg.1 Wood (mango) NRs. 42372.00 Per m3
Royalty/ Trip NRs. 150.00 DDC G.I.Wire (medium) NRs. 85.00 Per Kg
Hire Charge of Truck NRs./day 7700.0 S.N. 133, pg.6 Steel Reinf. NRs. 81.00 -do-
Working Hours 8 NRs./hr 962.50 NRs./hr 1307.69 From truck Analysis Steel Nails NRs. 80.00 -do-
Idle Hours NRs./hr 481.25 Binding Wire NRs. 14.10 -do-
Average Speed of Truck ( Km/hr.) Geo Textile (TS 60) NRs. 292.00 Per m2
Metalled Road 40.00 Brick NRs. 8.41 Per no
Gravelled Road / Earthen Road 20.00 Rubber Seal NRs. 500.00 Per m
HDPE Pipe (2.5") NRs. 105.83 Per m
Load & Unload Transportatio Market
Royalty Unit Cost
S. No. Material Unit Quantity Average Haulage Distance (Km) Collection Cost Cost n Price
Truck
per Trip Metalled Gravelled/ Total Unskilled Unskilled Unit Haulage Per Unit (NRs./m3) per Unit of Material
only
Ref. Road Earthen Cost without at Site
Head Labour Unit Cost Labour Cost
Table-2 Road load Ref.No. 3 (NRs.) Table-2 (NRs.) (NRs.) VAT(NRs.) (NRs.)
1 Sand m 3
5.38 2.80 2.80 2.50 875.00 0.0554 19.39 117.18 0.00 117.18 27.88 1039.44
2 Stone Gravel m3 4.69 2.80 2.80 0.01 4.00 1400.00 0.0667 23.36 134.42 105.00 239.42 31.98 1694.76
3 Boulder m3 3.50 2.80 2.80 0.01 1.40 490.00 0.0894 31.30 180.13 385.00 565.13 42.86 1129.27
4 River Bed Material m3 4.69 2.80 2.80 0.01 0.80 280.00 0.0667 23.36 134.42 0.00 134.42 31.98 469.76
5 Cement Bag 120.00 2.70 2.30 5.00 14.00 5.94 0.00 5.94 625.00 644.93
6 Wood m3 10.53 2.00 2.00 353.40 52.56 0.00 52.56 42372.00 42777.95
7 G.I.Wire Kg 6000.00 2.70 2.30 5.00 0.07 0.12 0.00 0.12 85.00 85.18
8 Steel Reinf. Kg 6000.00 2.70 2.30 5.00 0.10 0.12 0.00 0.12 81.00 81.21
9 Steel Nails Kg 6000.00 2.70 2.30 5.00 0.10 0.12 0.00 0.12 80.00 80.21
10 Binding Wire Kg 6000.00 2.70 2.30 5.00 0.10 0.12 0.00 0.12 14.10 14.31
11 Geo Textile m2 2000.00 2.70 2.30 5.00 0.10 0.36 0.00 0.36 292.00 292.45
12 Rubber Seal m 3000.00 2.70 2.30 5.00 0.10 0.24 0.00 0.24 500.00 500.33
13 Soil m2 5.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.70 245.00 0.0626 21.91 110.69 0.00 110.69 377.59
14 HDPE Pipe (2.5") m 4300.00 2.70 2.30 5.00 0.10 0.17 0.00 0.17 105.83 106.09
15 Brick no 2400.00 2.70 2.30 5.00 0.08 0.30 0.00 0.30 8.41 8.78
Note: Source: District Rate, Dang, (2070/71)
Hire Charge of Truck (6ton) from Truck analysis is 1307.69 per hour. From District rate, hire charge of truck per day is NRs. 7000. According to International Labour Convention (1919 and 1930), maximum working hours is 8.
to District rate, hire charge of 6ton truck NRs. 875/hr is chosen.

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


According to Rate Analysis Norms (2010), 21. Transportation by truck: Labour cost for working hour and loading/unloading (idle) hour is same. But, in this report, we have reduced the cost for idle hour by half.

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


oject : Rajhena ISP,

S.N. 2, pg.8
S.N. 4, pg.17
S.N. 8, pg.8
S.N. 11, pg.12
S.N. 15, pg.12
S.N. 13, pg.12

S.N. 12, pg.8


S.N. 5, pg.2
Market Rate
Panchakanya

Location Remarks

Rapti
Rapti
Rapti
Rapti
Kohalpur
Local
Kohalpur
Kohalpur
Kohalpur
Kohalpur
Kohalpur
Kohalpur
Local
Kohalpur
Kohalpur
Source: District Rate, Dang, (2070/71)
er day is NRs. 7000. According to International Labour Convention (1919 and 1930), maximum working hours is 8. So sccording

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


Rate Analysis 11
ANALYSIS OF RATE
For Fiscal Year 2070/71
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

1. Cutting thick vegetation, grubing by roots and disposal 25m far from the construction site.
(Ref.No.1-3) For 1m2.
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 0.04 350.00 14.00
Skilled md.
Tools & Plants % 3.00 0.42
Sub-Total 14.42
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 2.16
Grand Total 16.58
Rate for 1m2 with Contractor's Overhead and Profit 16.58

2. Earth Work in excavation in foundation in boulder mix soil including disposal up to 10m lead and 1.5m
lift.
(Ref.No.2-14) For 1m3.
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 1.59 350.00 556.50
Skilled md.
Tools & Plants % 3.00 16.69
Sub-Total 573.19
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 85.97
Grand Total 659.16
Rate for 1m3 with Contractor's Overhead and Profit 659.16

3. Earth Work in backfilling in 15cm thick layer and hand compaction (haulage distance 10m).
(Ref.No.2-25/b) For 1m3.
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 0.25 350.00 87.50
Skilled md.
Tools & Plants % 3.00 2.62
Sub-Total 90.12
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 13.51
Grand Total 103.63
Rate for 1m with Contractor's Overhead and Profit
3 103.63

4. Filling by stones in the foundation and levelling including haulage distance upto 30m
(Ref. No.-6-5) For 1m3.
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 1.50 350.00 525.00
Skilled md. 500.00 0.00
2 Materials
Boulder m3 1.20 1129.27 1355.12
Sub-Total 1880.12
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 282.01

Prepared by Checked by Approved by


Rate Analysis 12
ANALYSIS OF RATE
For Fiscal Year 2070/71
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Grand Total 2162.13
Rate for 1m3 with Contractor's Overhead and Profit 2162.13

Prepared by Checked by Approved by


Rate Analysis 13
ANALYSIS OF RATE
For Fiscal Year 2070/71
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

5 Concreting of foundation ,vert. faces,walls (cement conc.) including supply of materials and haulage
distance up to 30m. P.C.C.1:4:8 (Ref No.-7-2/b) For 1m3.
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 4.00 350.00 1400.00
Skilled md. 1.00 500.00 500.00
2 Materials
Cement bag 3.40 644.93 2192.76
Sand m 3
0.47 1039.44 488.53
Coarse Aggregate m3 0.85 1694.76 1440.54
Sub-Total 6021.83
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 903.27
Grand Total 6925.10
Rate for 1m3 with Contractor's Overhead and Profit 6925.10

6. Concreting of foundation ,vert. faces,walls (cement conc.) including supply of materials and haulage
distance up to 30m. P.C.C.1:2:4 (Ref No.-7-2/d) For 1m3.
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 4.00 350.00 1400.00
Skilled md. 1.00 500.00 500.00
2 Materials
Cement bag 6.40 644.93 4127.55
Sand m 3
0.45 1039.44 462.55
Coarse Aggregate m3 0.85 1694.76 1440.54
Sub-Total 7930.64
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 1189.59
Grand Total 9120.23
Rate for 1m3 with Contractor's Overhead and Profit 9120.23

7. Concreting of foundation ,vert. faces,walls (cement conc.) including supply of materials and haulage
distance up to 30m. P.C.C.1:1.5:3 (Ref No.-7-4/b) For 1m3.
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 7.00 350.00 2450.00
Skilled md. 0.80 500.00 400.00
2 Materials
Cement bag 8.00 644.93 5159.44
Sand m 3
0.42 1039.44 440.72
Coarse Aggregate m3 0.86 1694.76 1457.49
Sub-Total 9907.65
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 1486.14
Grand Total 11393.79
Rate for 1m3 with Contractor's Overhead and Profit 11393.79

Prepared by Checked by Approved by


Rate Analysis 14
ANALYSIS OF RATE
For Fiscal Year 2070/71
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

8. Cutting,bending,placing in position as shown in the drawings and binding by wire of reinforcement steel
bars for R.C.C. works including haulage distance of 30m (Ref.No.-7-5) For 1 M.t
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 12.00 350.00 4200.00
Skilled md. 12.00 500.00 6000.00
2 Materials
Steel Kg 1050.00 81.21 85270.50
Binding Wire Kg 10.00 14.31 143.10
Sub-Total 95613.60
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 14342.04
Grand Total 109955.64
Rate for 1Kg with Contractor's Overhead and Profit 109.95

9. Making wooden forms including supply &selection of material, fixing, nailing according to drawgs,
placing separators, dismantling forms and hauling up to 30m distance. (Ref.No.8-2/a)
For 10m2.
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 2.57 350.00 899.50
Skilled md. 1.72 500.00 860.00
2 Materials
Wood m3 0.53 42777.95 3750.20 used 6 times
-25% of wood (937.55) Salvage value
Nail Kg 2.50 80.21 200.52
Sub-Total 4772.67
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 715.90
Grand Total 5488.57
Rate for 1m with Contractor's Overhead and Profit
2 548.85

10. Making rectangular gabion box (3m*1.5m*.75m) with two way knot including wire cutting, netting etc.
complete.Mesh size (100mm*100mm) ,mesh wire 10 S.W.G.gabion wire. (Ref.No.-16-9/a) For 15.75m2.
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 0.44 350.00 154.00
Skilled md. 0.70 500.00 350.00
2 Materials
G.I.Wire Kg 33.00 85.18 2810.94
Sub-Total 3314.94
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 497.24
Grand Total 3812.18
Rate for 1m with Contractor's Overhead and Profit
2 242.04

Prepared by Checked by Approved by


Rate Analysis 15
ANALYSIS OF RATE
For Fiscal Year 2070/71
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
11. Gabion construction work including placing gabion box in position ,tying and filling of stone in gabion
box.
(Ref. No.-16-6/c&16-11)
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 0.20 350.00 70.00
Skilled md. 0.50 500.00 250.00
2 Materials
Stone m3 1.00 1129.27 1129.27
Sub-Total 1449.27
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 217.39
Grand Total 1666.66
Rate for 1m3 with Contractor's Overhead and Profit 1666.66

12.Supplying and fixing of Rubber Water Stopper at joints all complete as per specification and approval of
engineers.
For 1m2
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 0.10 350.00 35.00
Skilled md. 0.01 500.00 5.00
2 Materials
Rubber Seal rm 1.00 500.33 500.33
Sub-Total 540.33
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 81.04
Grand Total 621.37
Rate for 1m2 with Contractor's Overhead and Profit 621.37

13.Supply and laying of Geo-textile (teram Paper) filter all complete as approved and Specified by the site
Engineer.
(Ref.No.-27-12-i) For 1m2
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 0.05 350.00 17.50
Skilled md. 500.00 0.00
2 Materials
Geotextile sheet m2 1.15 292.45 336.31
Sub-Total 353.81
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 53.07
Grand Total 406.88
Rate for 1m2 with Contractor's Overhead and Profit 406.88

Prepared by Checked by Approved by


Rate Analysis 16
ANALYSIS OF RATE
For Fiscal Year 2070/71
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

14 Supply and laying of 50mm diamenter polythene pipe in weep holes with all accessories complete job.
(Ref.No.-17-4-1) For 1m
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
2 Materials
Polythene pipe m2 1.00 106.09 106.09
Labour cost @ 5% of material cost 5.30
Sub-Total 111.39
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 16.70
Grand Total 128.09
Rate for 1m with Contractor's Overhead and Profit 128.09

15. Laying 300mm thick filter layer of 75mm to 6mm stone aggregates including up to 10m haulage.
(Ref. No.-23-1) For 1m3.
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 0.53 350.00 185.50
Skilled md. 0.35 500.00 175.00
2 Materials
Aggregate m3 1.00 1694.76 1694.76
Sub-Total 2055.26
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 308.28
Grand Total 2363.54
Rate for 1m3 with Contractor's Overhead and Profit 2363.54

16. Rubble masonary works included supply of hard stone blocks,preparing cement mortar & const.of wall
upto 5m high.(Haulage upto 10m) in cement motar of 1:6
(Ref. No.-6-1.c) For 1m3.
S.No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md. 5.00 350.00 1750.00
Skilled md. 1.50 500.00 750.00
2 Materials
Block Stone m3 1.00 1129.27 1129.27
Bund Stone m3 0.10 1129.27 112.92
Sub-Total 3742.19
Contractor'sOverhead % 15.00 561.32
Grand Total 4303.51
Rate for 1m3 with Contractor's Overhead and Profit 4303.51

Prepared by Checked by Approved by


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

RATE ANALYSIS
With reference to Sikta Irrigation Project, Nepalgunj, Banke

Analysis of equipment rates

S. No. Machinery Basic Price Fuel Consum

(NRs) (Ltr/hr)
1 Bulldozer 11 ton 7,478,958 11.5
2 Bulldozer 15 ton 9,888,990 16.5
4 Backhoe shovel 0.35m2 5,612,493 6.0
9 Dump Truck 4 ton 2,200,464 4.0
15 Tire roller 8.0 ton 4,276,497 6.2
20 Truck 6 ton 2,403,483 4.0

Required Data:
Interest rate , I=
Inflation rate, r=
No. of years from the year of procurment of equipment, n=
Custum Duty & Sale Tax (if any), D ( %)=
Transportation, Clearing, Forwarding cost up to destination, T=
Operator monthly Salary (for one), oms=
Helper monthly Salary (for one), hms=
Price of lubricants/litre, pll=
Price of fuel / litre, pfl=
Foreign Currency Proportion, fcp=

Prepared by: Checked by:2 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

1) Basis of the Hire Charge Rate of Heavy Equipments : Bulldozer 11 ton.


(Based on approved District rate)
1 Estimated Ownership period ( YEARS )
Where, H = Estimated life in hrs
h = Estimated annual operating hrs

2 Equipment cost ( NRs ) C


C=Co x E x (1 + r )^n x (1 + D ) + T ( 1 + r )^n
Where Co = C.I.F. Price of equipment in foreign
currency ( US $ )
E = Exchange rate during the time of calculation
of hire charge rate
( To be updated annually )
r = Infation rate ( Decimal )
n = No of years through which Co has to be
updated to get present C. I. F. price
( i.e. No of years from the year of procurement
of equipment
T = Transportation, Clearing, Forwarding cost
up to the destination
D = Cstom duty +Sales tax ( if any ) ( decimal )
3 Depriciation / hour Cd = C/H
4 Capital interest / hour = Ci = (N+1)/2Nx(C x i)/h
5 Owning cost per hour=(Cd+Ci) = ( 3 + 4 ) 1800.00
6 Maintenance cost &repair cost per hour,Cm=fm*Cd
Where fm=Maintenance &repair factor= 0.8
7 Operaters cost per hour , Cop =(13*1.1*s)/h
Where s=total monthly salary for one operator+one helper

8 Over head cost per hour= (Cxfoh)/H = Coh


Where foh = overhead cost factor = 0.05
9 Lubricant cost , Cl : 258.75
Cl = Fuel consumption / Hours x 0.045 x Price per ltr of lub.
Fuel consuption /Hours= 11.5
10 Fuel cost, Cf : 1023.50
Cf = Fuel consumption / Hours x Price per litre of fuel
11 Operating cost of equipment ( Exclusive of fuel ) =
Oc = Cm + Cop + Coh + Cl = ( 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 )
12 Hire charge rate per hour ( Exclusive of fuel )
He = Cd + Ci + Cm + Cop + Cl =
(5+6+7+8+9)
13 Hire charge idle rate per hour , ( Cd + Ci ) = ( 3 + 4 )
14 Operating cost of equipment ( Inclusive of fuel ) =
Oc + 10 = 6 + 7 +8 + 9 + 10 = Cm+Cop+Coh+Cl+Cf
Cm + Cop + Coh + Cl + Cf
15 Hire charge rate per hour ( inclusive of fuel ) =

Prepared by: Checked by:3 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

He + 10 = 5+6+7+8+9+10 = Cd+Ci+Cm+Cop+Coh+Cl+Cf 3082.25

FC = Foreign Currency Portion= 0.00


LC = Local Currency Portion = 3082.25

Prepared by: Checked by:4 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

2) Basis of the Hire Charge Rate of Heavy Equipments : Bulldozer 15 ton.


(Based on approved District rate)
1 Estimated Ownership period ( YEARS )
Where, H = Estimated life in hrs
h = Estimated annual operating hrs

2 Equipment cost ( NRs ) C


C=Co x E x (1 + r )^n x (1 + D ) + T ( 1 + r )^n
Where Co = C.I.F. Price of equipment in foreign
currency ( US $ )
E = Exchange rate during the time of calculation
of hire charge rate
( To be updated annually )
r = Infation rate ( Decimal )
n = No of years through which Co has to be
updated to get present C. I. F. price
( i.e. No of years from the year of procurement
of equipment
T = Transportation, Clearing, Forwarding cost
up to the destination
D = Cstom duty +Sales tax ( if any ) ( decimal )
3 Depriciation / hour Cd = C/H
4 Capital interest / hour = Ci = (N+1)/2Nx(C x i)/h
5 Owing cost per hour=(Cd+Ci) = ( 3 + 4 ) 3000.00
6 Maintenance cost &repair cost per hour,Cm=fm*Cd
Where fm=Maintenance &repair factor= 0.8
7 Operaters cost per hour , Cop =(13*1.1*s)/h
Where s=total monthly salary for one operator+one helper

8 Over head cost per hour= (Cxfoh)/H = Coh


Where foh = overhead cost factor = 0.05
9 Lubricant cost , Cl : 371.25
Cl = Fuel consumption / Hours x 0.045 x Price per ltr of lub.
Fuel consuption /Hours= 16.5
10 Fuel cost, Cf : 1468.50
Cf = Fuel consumption / Hours x Price per litre of fuel
11 Operating cost of equipment ( Exclusive of fuel ) =
Oc = Cm + Cop + Coh + Cl = ( 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 )
12 Hire charge rate per hour ( Exclusive of fuel )
He = Cd + Ci + Cm + Cop + Cl =
(5+6+7+8+9)
13 Hire charge idle rate per hour , ( Cd + Ci ) = ( 3 + 4 )
14 Operating cost of equipment ( Inclusive of fuel ) =
Oc + 10 = 6 + 7 +8 + 9 + 10 = Cm+Cop+Coh+Cl+Cf
Cm + Cop + Coh + Cl + Cf
15 Hire charge rate per hour ( inclusive of fuel ) =
He + 10 = 5+6+7+8+9+10 = Cd+Ci+Cm+Cop+Coh+Cl+Cf 4839.75

Prepared by: Checked by:5 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

FC = Foreign Currency Portion= 0.00


LC = Local Currency Portion = 4839.75

Prepared by: Checked by:6 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

3) Basis of the Hire Charge Rate of Heavy Equipments : Backhoe shovel 0.35m3
(Based on approved District rate)
1 Estimated Ownership period ( YEARS )
Where, H = Estimated life in hrs
h = Estimated annual operating hrs

2 Equipment cost ( NRs ) C


C=Co x E x (1 + r )^n x (1 + D ) + T ( 1 + r )^n
Where Co = C.I.F. Price of equipment in foreign
currency ( US $ )
E = Exchange rate during the time of calculation
of hire charge rate
( To be updated annually )
r = Infation rate ( Decimal )
n = No of years through which Co has to be
updated to get present C. I. F. price
( i.e. No of years from the year of procurement
of equipment
T = Transportation, Clearing, Forwarding cost
up to the destination
D = Cstom duty +Sales tax ( if any ) ( decimal )
3 Depriciation / hour Cd = C/H
4 Capital interest / hour = Ci = (N+1)/2Nx(C x i)/h
5 Owing cost per hour=(Cd+Ci) = ( 3 + 4 ) 1200.00
6 Maintenance cost &repair cost per hour,Cm=fm*Cd
Where fm=Maintenance &repair factor= 0.8
7 Operaters cost per hour , Cop =(13*1.1*s)/h
Where s=total monthly salary for one operator+one helper

8 Over head cost per hour= (Cxfoh)/H = Coh


Where foh = overhead cost factor = 0.05
9 Lubricant cost , Cl : 135
Cl = Fuel consumption / Hours x 0.045 x Price per ltr of lub.
Fuel consuption /Hours= 6
10 Fuel cost, Cf : 534.00
Cf = Fuel consumption / Hours x Price per litre of fuel
11 Operating cost of equipment ( Exclusive of fuel ) =
Oc = Cm + Cop + Coh + Cl = ( 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 )
12 Hire charge rate per hour ( Exclusive of fuel )
He = Cd + Ci + Cm + Cop + Cl =
(5+6+7+8+9)
13 Hire charge idle rate per hour , ( Cd + Ci ) = ( 3 + 4 )
14 Operating cost of equipment ( Inclusive of fuel ) =
Oc + 10 = 6 + 7 +8 + 9 + 10 = Cm+Cop+Coh+Cl+Cf
Cm + Cop + Coh + Cl + Cf
15 Hire charge rate per hour ( inclusive of fuel ) =

Prepared by: Checked by:7 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

He + 10 = 5+6+7+8+9+10 = Cd+Ci+Cm+Cop+Coh+Cl+Cf 1869.00

FC = Foreign Currency Portion= 0.00


LC = Local Currency Portion = 1869.00

Prepared by: Checked by:8 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

4) Basis of the Hire Charge Rate of Heavy Equipments : Dump Truck 4 ton

1 Estimated Ownership period ( YEARS ) 10


Where, H = Estimated life in hrs 10,000
h = Estimated annual operating hrs 1,000

2 Equipment cost ( NRs ) C


C=Co x E x (1 + r )^n x (1 + D ) + T ( 1 + r )^n 2223468.64
Where Co = C.I.F. Price of equipment in foreign
currency ( US $ )
E = Exchange rate during the time of calculation
of hire charge rate
( To be updated annually )
r = Infation rate ( Decimal )
n = No of years through which Co has to be
updated to get present C. I. F. price
( i.e. No of years from the year of procurement
of equipment
T = Transportation, Clearing, Forwarding cost
up to the destination
D = Cstom duty +Sales tax ( if any ) ( decimal )
3 Depriciation / hour Cd = C/H 222.35
4 Capital interest / hour = Ci = (N+1)/2Nx(C x i)/h 122.29
5 Owing cost per hour=(Cd+Ci) = ( 3 + 4 ) 344.64
6 Maintenance cost &repair cost per hour,Cm=fm*Cd 177.88
Where fm=Maintenance &repair factor= 0.8
7 Operaters cost per hour , Cop =(13*1.1*s)/h 278.85
Where s=total monthly salary for one operator+one helper

8 Over head cost per hour= (Cxfoh)/H = Coh 11.12


Where foh = overhead cost factor = 0.05
9 Lubricant cost , Cl : 90
Cl = Fuel consumption / Hours x 0.045 x Price per ltr of lub.
Fuel consuption /Hours= 4.0
10 Fuel cost, Cf : 356.00
Cf = Fuel consumption / Hours x Price per litre of fuel
11 Operating cost of equipment ( Exclusive of fuel ) = 557.84
Oc = Cm + Cop + Coh + Cl = ( 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 )
12 Hire charge rate per hour ( Exclusive of fuel ) 902.48
He = Cd + Ci + Cm + Cop + Cl =
(5+6+7+8+9)
13 Hire charge idle rate per hour , ( Cd + Ci ) = ( 3 + 4 ) 344.64
14 Operating cost of equipment ( Inclusive of fuel ) =
Oc + 10 = 6 + 7 +8 + 9 + 10 = Cm+Cop+Coh+Cl+Cf 913.84
Cm + Cop + Coh + Cl + Cf
15 Hire charge rate per hour ( inclusive of fuel ) =
He + 10 = 5+6+7+8+9+10 = Cd+Ci+Cm+Cop+Coh+Cl+Cf 1258.48

Prepared by: Checked by:9 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

FC = Foreign Currency Portion= 0.00


LC = Local Currency Portion = 1258.48

Prepared by: Checked by:10 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

5) Basis of the Hire Charge Rate of Heavy Equipments : Tire roller 8.0 ton

1 Estimated Ownership period ( YEARS ) 10


Where, H = Estimated life in hrs 10,000
h = Estimated annual operating hrs 1,000

2 Equipment cost ( NRs ) C


C=Co x E x (1 + r )^n x (1 + D ) + T ( 1 + r )^n 4320261.97
Where Co = C.I.F. Price of equipment in foreign
currency ( US $ )
E = Exchange rate during the time of calculation
of hire charge rate
( To be updated annually )
r = Infation rate ( Decimal )
n = No of years through which Co has to be
updated to get present C. I. F. price
( i.e. No of years from the year of procurement
of equipment
T = Transportation, Clearing, Forwarding cost
up to the destination
D = Cstom duty +Sales tax ( if any ) ( decimal )
3 Depriciation / hour Cd = C/H 432.03
4 Capital interest / hour = Ci = (N+1)/2Nx(C x i)/h 237.61
5 Owing cost per hour=(Cd+Ci) = ( 3 + 4 ) 669.64
6 Maintenance cost &repair cost per hour,Cm=fm*Cd 345.62
Where fm=Maintenance &repair factor= 0.8
7 Operaters cost per hour , Cop =(13*1.1*s)/h 278.85
Where s=total monthly salary for one operator+one helper

8 Over head cost per hour= (Cxfoh)/H = Coh 21.60


Where foh = overhead cost factor = 0.05
9 Lubricant cost , Cl : 139.5
Cl = Fuel consumption / Hours x 0.045 x Price per ltr of lub.
Fuel consuption /Hours= 6.2
10 Fuel cost, Cf : 551.80
Cf = Fuel consumption / Hours x Price per litre of fuel
11 Operating cost of equipment ( Exclusive of fuel ) = 785.57
Oc = Cm + Cop + Coh + Cl = ( 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 )
12 Hire charge rate per hour ( Exclusive of fuel ) 1455.21
He = Cd + Ci + Cm + Cop + Cl =
(5+6+7+8+9)
13 Hire charge idle rate per hour , ( Cd + Ci ) = ( 3 + 4 ) 669.64
14 Operating cost of equipment ( Inclusive of fuel ) =
Oc + 10 = 6 + 7 +8 + 9 + 10 = Cm+Cop+Coh+Cl+Cf 1337.37
Cm + Cop + Coh + Cl + Cf
15 Hire charge rate per hour ( inclusive of fuel ) =

Prepared by: Checked by:11 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

He + 10 = 5+6+7+8+9+10 = Cd+Ci+Cm+Cop+Coh+Cl+Cf 2007.01

FC = Foreign Currency Portion= 0.00


LC = Local Currency Portion = 2007.01

Prepared by: Checked by:12 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

6) Basis of the Hire Charge Rate of Heavy Equipments : Truck 6 ton

1 Estimated Ownership period ( YEARS ) 10


Where, H = Estimated life in hrs 10,000
h = Estimated annual operating hrs 1,000

2 Equipment cost ( NRs ) C


C=Co x E x (1 + r )^n x (1 + D ) + T ( 1 + r )^n 2428517.83
Where Co = C.I.F. Price of equipment in foreign
currency ( US $ )
E = Exchange rate during the time of calculation
of hire charge rate
( To be updated annually )
r = Infation rate ( Decimal )
n = No of years through which Co has to be
updated to get present C. I. F. price
( i.e. No of years from the year of procurement
of equipment
T = Transportation, Clearing, Forwarding cost
up to the destination
D = Cstom duty +Sales tax ( if any ) ( decimal )
3 Depriciation / hour Cd = C/H 242.85
4 Capital interest / hour = Ci = (N+1)/2Nx(C x i)/h 133.57
5 Owning cost per hour=(Cd+Ci) = ( 3 + 4 ) 376.42
6 Maintenance cost &repair cost per hour,Cm=fm*Cd 194.28
Where fm=Maintenance &repair factor= 0.8
7 Operaters cost per hour , Cop =(13*1.1*s)/h 278.85
Where s=total monthly salary for one operator+one helper

8 Over head cost per hour= (Cxfoh)/H = Coh 12.14


Where foh = overhead cost factor = 0.05
9 Lubricant cost , Cl : 90
Cl = Fuel consumption / Hours x 0.045 x Price per ltr of lub.
Fuel consuption /Hours= 4.0
10 Fuel cost, Cf : 356.00
Cf = Fuel consumption / Hours x Price per litre of fuel
11 Operating cost of equipment ( Exclusive of fuel ) = 575.27
Oc = Cm + Cop + Coh + Cl = ( 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 )
12 Hire charge rate per hour ( Exclusive of fuel ) 951.69
He = Cd + Ci + Cm + Cop + Cl =
(5+6+7+8+9)
13 Hire charge idle rate per hour , ( Cd + Ci ) = ( 3 + 4 ) 376.42
14 Operating cost of equipment ( Inclusive of fuel ) =
Oc + 10 = 6 + 7 +8 + 9 + 10 = Cm+Cop+Coh+Cl+Cf 931.27
Cm + Cop + Coh + Cl + Cf
15 Hire charge rate per hour ( inclusive of fuel ) =

Prepared by: Checked by:13 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

He + 10 = 5+6+7+8+9+10 = Cd+Ci+Cm+Cop+Coh+Cl+Cf 1307.69

FC = Foreign Currency Portion= 0.00


LC = Local Currency Portion = 1307.69

Prepared by: Checked by:14 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

RATE ANALYSIS
With reference to Sikta Irrigation Project, Nepalgunj, Banke

Summary of equipment rates per hour

SN Machinery Hire Charge

1 Bulldozer 11 ton 3082.25


2 Bulldozer 15 ton 4839.75
3 Backhoe shovel 0.35m3 1869.00
4 Dump Truck 4 ton 1258.48
5 Tire roller 8.0 ton 2007.01
6 Truck 6 ton 1307.69

Prepared by: Checked by:15 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

Remarks

0.10
0.05
0.00
0.01
1,000
12,000
7,500
500
89
0.00

Prepared by: Checked by:16 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

dozer 15 ton.

Prepared by: Checked by:17 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

Prepared by: Checked by:18 Approved by:


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

RATE ANALYSIS borrowed from SIKTA IRRIGATION PROJECT

Item rate analysis for different works


Excavation in major canals
Price:
Total : 12,275.90
FC : 0.00 /m LC : 122.76 /m Total NRs: 122.76 /m
Per 100 m3
Local Currency Foreign Currency
Particular Description Unit Qty
Unit Cost Amount Unit Cost
Equipment
Backhoe 0.35 m3 hr. 4.17 1,869.00 7,793.73 -
Dump truck 4 ton hr. 2.00 1,258.48 2,516.96 -

Labour
Foreman m/d 0.52 350.00 182.00
Unskilled m/d 0.52 350.00 182.00
sub-total 10,674.69

Miscellaneous -
O/H profit 15.00% 1,601.20
Total 12,275.90

Excavation in natural rivers


Price:
Total : 12,949.04
FC : 0.00 /m LC : 129.49 /m Total NRs: 129.49 /m
Per 100 m3
Local Currency Foreign Currency
Particular Description Unit Qty
Unit Cost Amount Unit Cost
Equipment
Backhoe 0.35 m3 hr. 2.1 1,869.00 3,924.90 -
Bulldozer 11 ton hr. 1.3 3,082.25 4,006.93 -
Dump truck 4 ton hr. 2.50 1,258.48 3,146.21 -

Labour
Foreman m/d 0.26 350.00 91.00
Unskilled m/d 0.26 350.00 91.00
sub-total 11,260.03

Miscellaneous -
O/H profit 15.00% 1,689.00
Total 12,949.04

Prepared By Checked By Approved By


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

RATE ANALYSIS borrowed from SIKTA IRRIGATION PROJECT

Item rate analysis for different works


Embankment for natural river, Type A
Price:
Total : NRs. 13,380.42
FC : 0.00 /m LC : 133.80 /m Per m3 : NRs. 133.80
Per 100 m3
Local Currency Foreign Currency
Particular Description Unit Qty
Unit Cost Amount Unit Cost
Equipment
Bulldozer 15 ton hr. 1.50 4,839.75 7,259.63 -
Tire roller 8 ton hr. 1.50 2,007.01 3,010.52 -

Labour
Foreman m/d 0.20 350.00 70.00
Unskilled m/d 0.20 350.00 70.00
For watering & trimming
Foreman m/d 0.50 350.00 175.00
Unskilled m/d 3.00 350.00 1,050.00
sub-total 11,635.14

Miscellaneous -
O/H profit 15.00% 1,745.27

Total 13,380.42

Embankment for major canals, Type A


Embankment using materials obtained from excavated site without hauling
Price: Total : NRs. 8511.61
FC : 0.00 /m LC : 85.12 /m Per m3 : NRs. 85.12
Per 100 m3
Local Currency Foreign Currency
Particular Description Unit Qty
Unit Cost Amount Unit Cost
Equipment
Bulldozer 15 ton hr. 1.04 4,141.80 4,307.47 -
Tire roller 8 ton hr. 1.06 1,631.07 1,728.93 -

Labour
Foreman m/d 0.20 350.00 70.00
Unskilled m/d 0.20 350.00 70.00
For watering & trimming
Foreman m/d 0.50 350.00 175.00
Unskilled m/d 3.00 350.00 1,050.00
sub-total 7,401.40

Miscellaneous -
O/H profit 15.00% 1,110.21

Total 8,511.61

Prepared By Checked By Approved By


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

RATE ANALYSIS borrowed from SIKTA IRRIGATION PROJECT

Item rate analysis for different works


Embankment for major canals, Type B
Embankment using materials obtained from excavated site with haulage
Price: Total : NRs. 15,303.24
FC : 0.00 /m LC : 153.03 /m Per m3 : NRs. 153.03
Per 100 m3
Local Currency Foreign Currency
Particular Description Unit Qty
Unit Cost Amount Unit Cost
Equipment
Bulldozer 11 ton hr. 0.70 2,595.80 1,817.06 -
Backhoe 0.70 m3 hr. 0.80 3,841.21 3,072.97 -
Dump truck 8 ton hr. 3.00 1,774.40 5,323.20 -
Tire roller 8 ton hr. 1.06 1,631.07 1,728.93 -

Labour
Foreman m/d 0.20 350.00 70.00
Unskilled m/d 0.20 350.00 70.00
For watering & trimming
Foreman m/d 0.50 350.00 175.00
Unskilled m/d 3.00 350.00 1,050.00
sub-total 13,307.16

Miscellaneous -
O/H profit 15.00% 1,996.07

Total 15,303.24

Prepared By Checked By Approved By


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

he project : Rajhena ISP,

ed from SIKTA IRRIGATION PROJECT

/100 m3

Foreign Currency
Amount

-
-

-
-
-

/100 m3

Foreign Currency
Amount

-
-
-

-
-
-

Prepared By Checked By Approved By


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

he project : Rajhena ISP,

ed from SIKTA IRRIGATION PROJECT

/100 m3

Foreign Currency
Amount

-
-

-
-

/100 m3

Foreign Currency
Amount

-
-

-
-

Prepared By Checked By Approved By


Rate Analysis of Lohadabre Irrigation Project

he project : Rajhena ISP,

ed from SIKTA IRRIGATION PROJECT

/100 m3

Foreign Currency
Amount

-
-
-
-

-
-

Prepared By Checked By Approved By


QUANTITY ESTIMATION
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Name of work : Construction of Weir
Location : Ch 0+000
Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
1 Excavation using machine
Dam
a core wall -
1.00 20.00 3.00 97.55 m3
3.25
b u/s stone pitching 4.78 -
1.00 20.00 102.40 m3
1.52 3.25
c d/s glacis 9.55 -
1.00 20.00 204.81 m3
3.05 3.25
g inverted gravel filter 1.00 20.00 10.00 0.50 100.00 m3
Sum 504.76 m3
Undersluice
a u/s floor 1.00 5.00 22.04 0.30 33.05 m3
b d/s glacis 0.30
1.00 5.00 0.30 0.22 m3
-
e d/s floor 7.46
1.00 5.00 13.97 260.27 m3
-
Sum 293.54 m 3
Retaining wall
a u/s and d/s wing
Stem 2.00 5.00 2.30 5.73 131.67 m3
Foundation 2.00 5.00 2.30 1.50 34.50 m3
b Return wall 2.30 1.50
2.00 49.70 677.90 m3
3.90 2.90
Sum 844.07 m 3
Blocks 5.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 3.75 m3
Guide Bund
a Launching apron
u/s 2.00 280.00 6.00 0.50 1,680.00 m3
d/s 2.00 5.00 3.00 0.50 15.00 m3
b Side slope
u/s 2.00 280.00 2.00 2.80 3,136.00 m3
d/s 2.00 5.00 2.00 2.80 56.00 m3
Sum 4,887.00 m 3
Total 6,533.12 m 3

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


Name of work : Construction of Weir
Location : Ch 0+000
Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
2 graded filter
drainage filter (gravel and Boulder) 1.00 15.00 10.00 0.50 75.00 m3
Stone aggregates filter
after undersluice 1.00 5.00 3.00 0.50 7.50 m3
behind retaining walls 2.00 59.00 0.50 7.40 218.37 m3
Sum 300.87 m 3
Total 300.87 m 3

3 Making embankment core by filling clay

Dam Portion
a Core Wall
0.50 m3
1.00 15.00 4.78 53.71
1.00
Sum 53.71 m 3
Total 53.71 m 3
Making embankment by filling all types of
4
soil (excavated earth)
Dam Portion
b u/s and d/s glacis 17.33 4.78
1.00 15.00 587.93 m3
7.57 1.52
deduction (central core) (53.71)
Sum 534.22 m3
excavated earth 6533.12 m3
Total 534.22 m 3
Making embankment by filling all types of
5
soil (borrowed soil)
Dam Portion 534.22 m3
Guide Bund
u/s 2.00 0.50
2.00 280.00 1,120.00 m3
6.00 0.50
d/s 2.00 0.50
2.00 5.00 12.50 m3
3.00 0.50
excavated earth (6,533.12)
Sum (4,866.40) m3
Total - m2
6 Stone Riprap
u/s glacis 1.00 15.00 6.75 0.30 30.39 m2
Sum 30.38 m3
Total 30.38 m 3

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


Name of work : Construction of Weir
Location : Ch 0+000
Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
mass
7 Concreting (1:2:4)
conc.
Undersluice
a u/s floor 1.00 5.00 22.04 0.15 16.52 m3
b d/s glacis 14.44 0.15
1.00 5.00 143.10 m3
15.69 3.65
c d/s floor 1.00 5.00 21.00 2.90 304.50 m3
f d/s cutoff 1.00 5.00 0.50 3.80 4.75 m3
g Chute Block 3.00 2.43 0.81 0.81 2.37 m3
h Floor block 4.00 0.61 0.61 0.81 1.20 m3
i End sill 1.00 5.00 2.20 0.85 4.66 m3
Sum 477.10 m 3
Blocks 5.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 3.75 m 3
Retaining wall
a u/s wing
Foundation 2.00 6.10 3.40 0.55 22.81 m3
Stem 0.20
2.00 5.00 5.73 22.90 m3
0.60
b Return wall
u/s
Foundation 2.00 21.74 3.40 0.55 81.28 m3
Stem 0.20
2.00 21.74 5.73 99.54 m3
0.60
d/s
Foundation 2.00 31.07 5.90 0.85 311.58 m3
Stem 0.20
2.00 31.07 9.08 352.58 m3
1.05
c d/s wing
Foundation 2.00 7.00 5.90 0.85 70.21 m3
Stem 0.20
2.00 7.00 9.08 79.45 m3
1.05
Sum 1,040.35 m 3
Divide Wall
1.00 59.00 0.50 4.78 140.86 m3
Sum 140.86 m 3
Pier
2.00 5.00 0.25 4.78 11.93 m3
Sum 11.93 m 3
Breast wall
3.00 0.10 0.20 4.10 0.24 m3

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


Name of work : Construction of Weir
Location : Ch 0+000
Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
Sum 0.24 m 3
Gate Operating slab
Undersluice 1.00 1.55 2.00 0.15 0.46 m3
Canal 1.00 1.80 2.00 0.15 0.54 m3
Sum 1.00 m3
Total 1,675.23 m 3
8 Concreting (1:1.5:3)
i Undersluice
a u/s floor 1.00 5.00 22.04 0.15 16.52 m3
b u/s glacis 1.00 5.00 1.41 0.15 1.06 m3
c Crest 1.00 5.00 1.00 0.15 0.75 m3
d d/s glacis 1.00 5.00 14.44 0.15 10.82 m3
e d/s floor 1.00 5.00 21.00 0.15 15.75 m3
Sum 44.90 m 3
Total 44.90 m3
9 Reinforcement steel works % Quantity Remarks
a 0.4% of 1:2:4 RCC quantity 0.40 % of RCC 52,484.47 kg
b 0.25% of 1:1.5:3 RCC quantity 0.25 % of RCC 881.16 kg
53,365.63 kg
10 Wooden form works
Undersluice
a d/s cutoff
Outer Face 1.00 5.00 3.85 19.25 m2
1.00 5.00 1.35 6.75 m2
Sides 2.00 0.50 3.85 3.85 m2
b Chute Block
Front Face 3.00 0.81 0.81 1.95 m2
Sides 6.00 2.43 0.81 11.77 m2
c Floor block
4 sides 16.00 0.61 0.81 7.88 m2
Sum 51.45 m 2
Blocks 5.00 4.00 0.75 15.00 m 2
Retaining wall
a u/s wing
Foundation
Outer Face 2.00 6.10 0.55 6.71 m2
Inner Face 2.00 2.70 0.55 2.97 m2
Stem
Outer Face 2.00 5.00 5.73 57.25 m2

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


Name of work : Construction of Weir
Location : Ch 0+000
Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
Inner Face 2.00 4.80 5.73 54.96 m2

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


Name of work : Construction of Weir
Location : Ch 0+000
Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
b Return wall
u/s
Foundation
sides 2.00 21.74 0.55 23.90 m2
Stem
sides 2.00 21.74 5.73 248.86 m2
d/s
Foundation
sides 2.00 31.07 0.85 52.81 m2
Stem
sides 2.00 31.07 9.08 564.14 m2
c d/s wing
Foundation
Outer Face 2.00 7.00 0.85 11.90 m2
Inner Face 2.00 1.10 0.85 1.87 m2
Stem
Outer Face 2.00 5.00 9.08 90.80 m2
Inner Face 2.00 4.80 9.08 87.16 m2
Sum 1,203.33 m 2
Divide Wall
Stem
Long Faces 2.00 59.00 4.78 563.45 m2
Short Faces 2.00 0.50 4.78 4.77 m2
Sum 568.22 m 2
Pier
Long Faces 4.00 5.00 4.78 95.50 m2
Short Faces 4.00 0.25 4.78 4.77 m2
Sum 100.27 m 2
Breast wall
Sides 6.00 0.10 4.10 2.45 m2
Bottom 3.00 0.20 4.10 2.45 m2
Sum 4.90 m 2
Gate Operating slab
Undersluice
Sides 1.00 1.55 2.00 0.15 1.06 m2
Bottom 3.00 0.10 2.00 0.60 m2
Canal
Sides 1.00 1.80 2.00 0.15 1.14 m2
Bottom 1.00 1.50 2.00 3.00 m2

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


Name of work : Construction of Weir
Location : Ch 0+000
Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
Sum 5.80 m 2
1,948.97 m 2
11 Supply and laying of Geotextile fabrics
Dam/Undersluice
u/s gabion 1.00 20.00 3.00 60.00 m2
d/s gabion 1.00 20.00 6.00 120.00 m2
Sum 180.00 m 2
Guide Bund (slope)
a u/s 2.00 280.00 3.00 1,680.00 m2
a d/s 2.00 5.00 3.00 30.00 m2
Sum 1,710.00 m 2
Total 1890.00 m 2
Supply and weaving of medium coated G. I.
12
boxes
(3x1.5x0.75)
Dam / Undersluice
u/s gabion (floor) 1.00 21.00 3.00 63.00 m2
d/s gabion (floor) 1.00 21.00 6.00 126.00 m2
between wingwalls and guide bund 1.00 3.00 3.00 9.00 m2
Sum 198.00 m2
No 44.00
Weaving Area 693.00 m 2
(3x1.5x0.50)
Guide Bund
a u/s
Launching apron 2.00 280.00 3.00 1,680.00 m2
a d/s
Launching apron 2.00 5.00 3.00 30.00 m2
Sum 1710.00 m2
No 380.00
Weaving Area 5130.00 m 2
(3x1.5x0.30)
Guide Bund
a u/s
Side slope 2.00 280.00 3.00 1,680.00 m2
a d/s
Side slope 2.00 5.00 3.00 30.00 m2
Sum 1710.00 m2

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


Name of work : Construction of Weir
Location : Ch 0+000
Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
No 380.00
Weaving Area 4446.00 m 2
Total 10269.00 m 2

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


Name of work : Construction of Weir
Location : Ch 0+000
Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
13 Supply and filling of boulders in G. I. boxes
(3x1.5x0.75)
Weir/ Undersluice 198.00 0.75 148.50 m3
Guide Bund
(3x1.5x0.50)
Launching apron 1710.00 0.50 855.00 m3
(3x1.5x0.30)
Side slope 1710.00 0.30 513.00 m3
Sum 1516.50 m 3
Total 1516.50 m 3
14 Polythene pipe in weep holes
Lump sum 27.00 m
Total 27.00 m
15 Dewatering , Channelising of water 1.00 1.00 job
Total 1.00 job
16 Bearing gear sliding gates 5.00 5.00 nos
Total 5.00 nos
17 Site clearance 1.00 job
Total 1.00 job
18 Acess Road 1.00 job
Total 1.00 job

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


Abstract of Cost
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Name of work : Construction of Weir
Location : Ch 0+000

S.N. Description of work Unit Quantity Rate Amounts Remarks


1 Excavation using machine m3 6,533.12 129.49 845,973.70
2 graded filter m3 300.87 2,363.54 711,118.27
3 Making embankment core by filling
clay m3 53.71 153.03 8,219.24
4 Making embankment by filling all
types of soil (excavated earth) m3 534.22 85.11 45,467.46
5 Making embankment by filling all
types of soil (borrowed soil) m3 - 133.80 -
6 Stone Riprap m3 30.38 2,162.13 65,685.50
7 Concreting (1:2:4) m3 1,675.23 9,120.23 15,278,482.90
8 Concreting (1:1.5:3) m 3
44.90 11,393.79 511,581.17
9 Reinforcement steel works Kg 53,365.63 109.95 5,867,551.51
10 Wooden form works m2 1,948.97 548.85 1,069,692.18
11 Supply and laying of Geotextile
fabrics m2 1,890.00 406.88 769,003.20
12 Supply and weaving of medium
coated G. I. boxes m2 10,269.00 242.04 2,485,508.76
13 Supply and filling of boulders in G. I.
boxes m3 1,516.50 1,666.66 2,527,489.89
14 Polythene pipe in weep holes m 27.00 128.09 3,458.43
15 Dewatering , Channelising of water job 1.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 L.S.
16 Bearing gear sliding gates Nos 5.00 50,000.00 250,000.00 L.S.
17 Site clearance job 1.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 L.S.
18 Acess Road job 1.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 L.S.
Total Total Rs 30,569,232.21

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


EARTHWORK CALCULATION SHEET
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Name of work : Earthwork in excavation
Location :Right (main and branch) canal, Left main canal

Cut Fill
S.N. Description of work Dist. Remarks
Area Volume Area Volume
1 Earth Work in excavation
A Right Main Canal
0+000 0.000 2.592
0+030 30.00 0.000 0.00 2.592 77.76
0+060 30.00 0.161 2.42 2.261 72.80
0+069 9.40 0.691 4.00 0.520 13.07
B Right Main - Right Branch Canal
0+000 0.497 0.527
0+021 20.60 0.579 11.08 0.421 9.76
0+024 3.00 1.425 3.01 0.171 0.89
0+051 27.00 0.966 32.28 0.171 4.62
0+081 30.00 0.661 24.41 0.022 2.90
0+111 30.00 0.895 23.34 0.000 0.33
0+141 30.00 0.361 18.84 0.135 2.03
0+171 30.00 1.097 21.87 0.000 2.03
0+201 30.00 0.355 21.78 0.164 2.46
0+231 30.00 1.214 23.54 0.000 2.46
0+261 30.00 0.000 18.21 1.416 21.24
0+291 30.00 0.201 3.02 0.454 28.05
0+321 30.00 0.359 8.40 0.257 10.67
0+351 30.00 0.879 18.57 0.012 4.04
0+381 30.00 0.805 25.26 0.010 0.33
0+411 30.00 0.842 24.71 0.011 0.32
C Right Main - Left Branch Canal
0+000 0.497 0.528
0+030 30.00 0.594 16.37 0.175 10.55
0+060 30.00 0.363 14.36 0.623 11.97
0+090 30.00 0.332 10.43 0.794 21.26
0+093 3.00 1.020 2.03 0.433 1.84
0+120 27.00 0.199 16.46 0.431 11.66
0+150 30.00 1.466 24.98 0.000 6.47
0+180 30.00 0.201 25.01 0.326 4.89
0+210 30.00 0.857 15.87 0.046 5.58
0+240 30.00 0.662 22.79 0.038 1.26
0+270 30.00 0.651 19.70 0.029 1.01
0+300 30.00 0.973 24.36 0.023 0.78

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


EARTHWORK CALCULATION SHEET
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Name of work : Earthwork in excavation
Location :Right (main and branch) canal, Left main canal

Cut Fill
S.N. Description of work Dist. Remarks
Area Volume Area Volume
0+330 30.00 1.814 41.81 0.000 0.35
0+360 30.00 1.165 44.69 0.000 0.00
0+390 30.00 1.280 36.68 0.000 0.00
0+420 30.00 1.805 46.28 0.000 0.00
0+450 30.00 2.223 60.42 0.000 0.00
0+480 30.00 2.350 68.60 0.000 0.00
0+510 30.00 1.906 63.84 0.000 0.00
0+540 30.00 1.778 55.26 0.000 0.00
0+570 30.00 1.712 52.35 0.000 0.00
0+600 30.00 1.941 54.80 0.000 0.00
0+630 30.00 2.800 71.12 0.000 0.00
0+660 30.00 2.922 85.83 0.000 0.00
0+690 30.00 2.866 86.82 0.000 0.00
0+720 30.00 0.011 43.16 0.503 7.55
Left Main Canal
0+000 0.000 2.019
0+030 30.00 1.239 18.59 0.000 30.29
0+060 30.00 1.125 35.46 0.000 0.00
0+090 30.00 0.961 31.29 0.000 0.00
0+120 30.00 0.998 29.39 0.000 0.00
0+150 30.00 1.267 33.98 0.000 0.00
0+180 30.00 1.082 35.24 0.000 0.00
0+210 30.00 1.179 33.92 0.000 0.00
0+240 30.00 1.171 35.25 0.000 0.00
0+255 15.00 0.984 16.16 0.000 0.00
0+270 15.00 0.988 14.79 0.000 0.00
0+300 30.00 0.993 29.72 0.000 0.00
0+330 30.00 1.000 29.90 0.000 0.00
0+360 30.00 1.248 33.72 0.000 0.00
0+390 30.00 1.459 40.61 0.000 0.00
0+420 30.00 1.354 42.19 0.000 0.00
Total: 1620.00 1748.83 371.15 m 3

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


QUANTITY ESTIMATION
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Name of work : Canal Lining and aqueduct
Location :Right (main and branch) canal, Left main canal
540 m lined
Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
1 Excavation in GBM using machine
a from earthwork calculation sheet 1.00 1,748.83
b cutoffs
canal lining end
Right (right branch) 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 1.00
Right (left branch) 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 1.00
Left canal (aqueduct) 1.00 2.50 1.00 0.50 1.25
c stone rip rap at the end of
Right (right branch) 1.00 3.00 2.00 0.50 3.00
Right (left branch) 1.00 3.00 2.00 0.50 3.00
Left canal (aqueduct) 1.00 3.00 2.50 0.50 3.75
Total 1,761.83 Cum
2 Earth Work in backfilling
a from earthwork calculation sheet 371.15
b cutoffs 50% 1.62
c stone rip rap 10% 0.97
Total 373.74 Cum
3 Concreting (1:4:8)
a Lining base
Right canal 1.00 69.40 1.80 0.05 6.24
Right (right branch) 1.00 20.60 1.30 0.50 13.39
Right (left branch) 1.00 30.00 1.30 0.50 19.50
Left canal (aqueduct) 52.00 1.70 0.60 0.05 2.65
b cutoffs
Right (right branch) 1.00 2.00 0.15 0.05 0.01
Right (left branch) 1.00 2.00 0.15 0.05 0.01
Left canal (aqueduct) 1.00 2.50 0.15 0.05 0.01
Total 41.81 cum
4 Concreting (1:2:4)
Canal
a Bed
Right canal 1.00 69.40 1.80 0.10 12.49
Right (right branch) 1.00 20.60 1.30 0.10 2.67
Right (left branch) 1.00 30.00 1.30 0.10 3.90
Left canal (aqueduct) 52.00 1.70 0.60 0.10 5.30
b Wall
Right canal 2.00 69.40 0.10 0.50 6.94
Right (right branch) 2.00 20.60 0.10 0.50 2.06

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


QUANTITY ESTIMATION
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Name of work : Canal Lining and aqueduct
Location :Right (main and branch) canal, Left main canal
540 m lined
Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
Right (left branch) 2.00 30.00 0.10 0.50 3.00
Left canal (aqueduct) 104.00 1.70 0.10 0.50 8.84
c cutoffs
Right (right branch)
base 1.00 2.00 0.15 0.50 0.15
wing walls 2.00 0.50 0.15 0.50 0.07
Right (left branch)
base 1.00 2.00 0.15 0.50 0.15
wing walls 2.00 0.50 0.15 0.50 0.07
Left canal (aqueduct)
base 1.00 2.50 0.15 0.50 0.18
wing walls 2.00 0.50 0.15 0.50 0.07
Total 45.89 cum
5 Reinforcement steel bars
0.60% of RCC 2161.41 kg
Total 2,161.41 Kg
6 Wooden form works
a Right canal
Outer Face 2.00 69.40 0.65 90.22
Inner Face 2.00 69.40 0.50 69.40
b Right (right branch)
Outer Face 2.00 20.60 1.10 45.32
Inner Face 2.00 20.60 0.50 20.60
c Right (left branch)
Outer Face 2.00 30.00 1.10 66.00
Inner Face 2.00 30.00 0.50 30.00
d Left canal (aqueduct)
Outer Face 2.00 420.00 1.10 924.00
Inner Face 2.00 420.00 0.50 420.00
base 1.00 396.60 0.50 198.30
Total 1,863.84 sqm
7 Rubber Seal
a Right canal 1.00 2.15 2.15
b Right (right branch) - 1.65 -
c Right (left branch) - 1.65 -
d Left canal 52.00 2.15 111.80
Total 113.95 rm

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


QUANTITY ESTIMATION
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Name of work : Canal Lining and aqueduct
Location :Right (main and branch) canal, Left main canal
540 m lined
Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
8 stone rip rap
a Right (right branch)
base 1.00 3.00 2.00 0.50 3.00
sides 0.20
2.00 3.00 0.50 1.05
0.50
b Right (left branch)
base 1.00 3.00 2.00 0.50 3.00
sides 0.20
2.00 3.00 0.50 1.05
0.50
c Left canal (aqueduct)
base 1.00 3.00 2.50 0.50 3.75
sides 0.20
2.00 3.00 0.50 1.05
0.50
Total 12.90 m 3
9 Stone Masonry
a Left canal (aqueduct)
footing 52.00 1.70 0.60 0.50 26.52
1st step -
52.00 1.70 0.45 10.74
0.54
Total 37.26 m 3

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


Abstract of Cost
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Name of work : Canal Lining and aqueduct
Location :Right (main and branch) canal, Left main canal

S.N. Description of work Unit Quantity Rate Amounts Remarks

1 Excavation in GBM using machine m3 1,761.83 122.76 216,281.78


2 Earth Work in backfilling m3 373.74 103.63 38,731.15
3 Concreting (1:4:8) m3
41.81 6,925.10 289,538.43
4 Concreting (1:2:4) m3 45.89 9,120.23 418,527.35
5 Reinforcement steel bars Kg. 2,161.41 109.95 237,647.02
6 Wooden form works m2
1,863.84 548.85 1,022,968.58
7 Rubber Seal m 113.95 621.37 70,805.11
8 stone rip rap m3
12.90 2,162.13 27,891.47
9 Stone Masory m3 37.26 4,303.51 160,348.78
Total Rs 2,482,739.67

Estimated: Checked: Approved:


QUANTITY ESTIMATION
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Name of work : Construction of (1-way) Distribution Outlet
Location : At various Chainages No: 3

Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
1 Earth Work in excavation
a cut off
Main Canal 2.00 3.70 0.45 0.50 1.66
Branch Canal 1.00 3.20 0.45 0.50 0.72
b floor
Main Canal 1.00 10.50 2.50 0.50 13.12
Branch Canal 1.00 35.25 2.00 0.50 35.25
c d/s launching
Main Canal 1.00 3.00 1.50 0.30 1.35
Branch Canal 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.30 0.60
Total 52.70 m 3
2 Earth Work in backfilling 10% of excavation 5.27
Total 5.27 m 3
3 Concreting (1:2:4)
a cut off
Main Canal 2.00 3.50 0.15 0.30 0.31
Branch Canal 1.00 3.00 0.15 0.30 0.13
c slab 1.00 1.00 1.80 0.15 0.27
Total 0.71 m 3
4 Reinforcement steel bars for RCC
0.65% of RCC in (1:2:4) 36.23
Total 36.23 Kg
5 Wooden form works
a cut off
Main Canal
outer face 2.00 3.50 0.30 2.10
inner face 2.00 3.50 0.30 2.10
ends 4.00 0.15 0.30 0.18
Branch Canal
outer face 1.00 3.00 0.30 0.90
inner face 1.00 3.00 0.30 0.90
ends 2.00 0.15 0.30 0.09
f slab
Base 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.50
Total 7.77 m 2
6 Stone Riprap
d/s launching
Main Canal 1.00 3.00 1.50 0.30 1.35

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


QUANTITY ESTIMATION
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Name of work : Construction of (1-way) Distribution Outlet
Location : At various Chainages No: 3

Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
Branch Canal 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.30 0.60
Total 1.95 m 3

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


Abstract of Cost
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Name of work : Construction of (1-way) Distribution Outlet
Location : At various Chainages

S.N. Description of work Unit Quantity Rate Amounts Remarks


1 Earth Work in excavation m3 52.70 659.16 34,737.73
2 Earth Work in backfilling m 3
5.27 103.63 546.13
3 Concreting (1:2:4) m3 0.71 9,120.23 6,475.36
4 Reinforcement steel bars for Kg. 36.23 109.95 3,983.24
5 RCC
Wooden form works m2 7.77 548.85 4,264.56
6 Stone Riprap m 3
1.95 2,162.13 4,216.15
Sum 54,223.17 3
Total 162,669.51

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


QUANTITY ESTIMATION
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Name of work : Construction of V.R.B.
Location : At various Chainages No: 1

Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
1 Earth Work in excavation
a cut off 2.00 0.50 3.60 0.30 1.08
b floor 1.00 5.60 2.90 1.00 16.24
c return wall 4.00 0.35 1.00 1.00 1.40
Total 18.72 m 3
2 Earth Work in backfilling 10% of excavation 1.87
Total 1.87 m 3
3 Concreting (1:4:8)
a cut off 2.00 0.20 3.60 0.05 0.07
b floor 1.00 5.00 2.00 0.05 0.50
c approach slab 2.00 5.00 2.00 0.05 1.00
Total 1.57 m 3
4 Concreting(1:2:4)
a cut off 2.00 0.20 3.50 0.30 0.42
b floor 1.00 5.00 1.90 0.20 1.90
d side wall 2.00 5.00 0.20 0.90 1.80
c slab 1.00 5.00 1.90 0.20 1.90
e return 4.00 0.80 0.20 1.10 0.70
f parapet 2.00 1.90 0.20 0.50 0.38
g approach slab 2.00 5.00 2.00 0.15 3.00
Total 10.10 m 3
5 reinforcement steel bars for RCC
0.65% of RCC in (1:2:4) 515.35
Total 515.35 Kg
6 Wooden form works
a cut off
outer face 2.00 3.50 0.35 2.45
inner face 2.00 3.50 0.30 2.10
ends 4.00 0.20 0.35 0.28
d side wall
outer face 2.00 5.00 1.35 13.50
inner face 2.00 5.00 0.90 9.00
e return
outer face 4.00 1.00 1.35 5.40
inner face 4.00 0.80 1.35 4.32
ends 4.00 0.20 1.35 1.08

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


QUANTITY ESTIMATION
Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,
Name of work : Construction of V.R.B.
Location : At various Chainages No: 1

Dimensions
S.N. Description of work No. Quantity Remarks
L B H or D
f parapet
outer face 2.00 1.90 0.70 2.66
inner face 2.00 1.90 0.50 1.90
ends 4.00 0.20 0.70 0.56
f approach slab
outer face
Long side 2.00 5.00 0.20 2.00
Short side 4.00 2.00 0.20 1.60
Total 46.85 m 2
7 Stone Riprap
d/s launching
Main Canal 1.00 5.00 2.90 0.30 4.35
Total 4.35 m 3

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

SUMMARY OF CIVIL WORK

S.N.Description of work Unit Quantity Rate Amounts Remarks


1 Headwork Job 1.00 30,569,232.21 30,569,232.21
2 Canal lining m 1.00 2,482,739.67 2,482,739.67
3 Flow Dividers no 3.00 54,223.17 162,669.51
4 VRB No 1.00 207,302.06 207,302.06
Total 33,421,943.45

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


SUMMARY OF COST

Name of the project : Rajhena ISP,

S.No. Description of Works Cost ( NRs. ) Remarks


A Indivisual Cost
1 Head Work 30,569,232.21
2 Canal lining 2,482,739.67
3 Flow Dividers 162,669.51
4 VRB 207,302.06
Total: 33,421,943.45
B General Items
i Insurance of the work (0.15% of A) 50,132.91
ii Third Party Insurance (0.15% of A) 50,132.91
iii Insurance against accident to work man (0.15% of A) 50,132.91
iv Commission for performance bond (0.05% of A) 16,710.97
Total: 167,109.70
C Miscellaneous Items
i Environmental Protection works (0.25% of A) 83,554.85
ii Institutional Development (0.25% of A) 83,554.85
iii Pre-Construction Survey 100,000.00
Total: 267,109.70
D Other facilities
i Work Charge (2.5% of A) 835,548.58
ii Other minor expenses (2.5 % A) 835,548.58
iii Physical contingencies (10% A) 3,342,194.34
iv Price adjustment Contingencies (10 % of A) 3,342,194.34
Total: 8,355,485.84
E VAT @ 13 % of (A+B) 4,366,576.90
Grand Total (A+B+C+D+E) 46,578,225.59
Say: 46,578,000.00

Estimated by Checked by Approved by


ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Crop Budget Form
Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP,
Location:Simariya, Sunsari H = Hybrid, I = Improved, L = Local
"with project"
Paddy Wheat Maize Oilseed Pulse Potato Vegetables
S.N Particulars Unit
H+I I H+I I I I H+I

1 Yield t/ha 4.00 3.50 4.00 1.50 1.80 12.00 13.00


Price NRs./t 20,000.00 21,000.00 19,000.00 48,000.00 60,000.00 20,000.00 18,000.00
Value NRs./t 80,000.00 73,500.00 76,000.00 72,000.00 108,000.00 240,000.00 234,000.00
2 By Product t/ha 2.50 1.75 1.75 0.70 0.70
Price NRs./t 2,500.00 3,000.00 1,500.00 1,200.00 3,000.00 600.00 600.00
Value NRs./t 6,250.00 5,250.00 2,625.00 840.00 2,100.00 - -
3 Gross Return NRs./t 86,250.00 78,750.00 78,625.00 72,840.00 110,100.00 240,000.00 234,000.00
4 Seed Kg/ha 50.00 120.00 30.00 12.00 40.00 1,500.00 5.00
Price NRs./kg 30.00 25.00 22.80 57.80 54.00 30.00 800.00
Value NRs./ha 1,500.00 3,000.00 684.00 693.60 2,160.00 45,000.00 4,000.00
5 Organic Fertilizer Kg/ha 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
Price NRs./kg 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Value NRs./ha 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00
6 Chemical Fertilize Kg/ha 100.00 100.0 60.00 30.00 30.00 100.00 100.00
Price NRs./ha 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Value NRs./ha 3,500.00 3,500.00 2,100.00 1,050.00 1,050.00 3,500.00 3,500.00
7 Phosphorus P Kg/ha 50.00 50.00 50.00 30.00 30.00 50.00 50.00
Price NRs./ha 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00
Value NRs./ha 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 2,000.00 2,000.00
8 Potassium K Kg/ha 30.00 30.00 30.00 20.00 20.00 40.00 40.00
Price NRs./ha 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Value NRs./ha 900.00 900.00 900.00 600.00 600.00 1,200.00 1,200.00
9 Pesticide NRs./ha 400.00 300.00 400.00 100.00 100.00 600.00 600.00
10 Labour (unskilled) m-d/ha 140.00 120.00 120.00 70.00 70.00 200.00 200.00
Price NRs./ha 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00
Value NRs./ha 49,000.00 42,000.00 42,000.00 24,500.00 24,500.00 70,000.00 70,000.00
11 Animal Labour m-d/ha 40.00 35.00 35.00 30.00 20.00 40.00 40.00
Price NRs./ha 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00
Value NRs./ha 16,000.00 14,000.00 14,000.00 12,000.00 8,000.00 16,000.00 16,000.00
Sub Total NRs./ha 77,300.00 69,700.00 66,084.00 44,143.60 41,610.00 146,300.00 105,300.00
5% Contingency 3,865.00 3,485.00 3,304.20 2,207.18 2,080.50 7,315.00 5,265.00
Total Cost 81,165.00 73,185.00 69,388.20 46,350.78 43,690.50 153,615.00 110,565.00
NET RETURN NRs./ha 5,085.00 5,565.00 9,236.80 ### 66,409.50 86,385.00 ###

30 Crop Budget
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Crop Budget Form
Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP,
Location:Simariya, Sunsari H = Hybrid, I = Improved, L = Local
"without project"
Paddy Wheat Maize Oilseed Pulse Potato Vegetables
S.N Particulars Unit
L+I I I I+L I+L I+L H+I+L

1 Yield t/ha 3.00 2.50 2.10 0.64 0.55 7.00 7.00


Price NRs./t 20,000.00 21,000.00 19,000.00 48,000.00 60,000.00 20,000.00 18,000.00
Value NRs./ha 60,000.00 52,500.00 39,900.00 30,720.00 33,000.00 140,000.00 126,000.00
2 By Product t/ha 2.00 1.50 1.25 0.50 0.50 - -
Price NRs./t 2,500.00 3,000.00 1,500.00 1,200.00 3,000.00 600.00 600.00
Value NRs./ha 5,000.00 4,500.00 1,875.00 600.00 1,500.00 - -
3 Gross Return NRs./ha 65,000.00 57,000.00 41,775.00 31,320.00 34,500.00 140,000.00 126,000.00
4 Seed Kg/ha 60.00 100.00 40.00 15.00 50.00 1,000.00 5.00
Price NRs./kg 30.00 25.00 22.80 57.80 54.00 30.00 800.00
Value NRs./ha 1,800.00 2,500.00 912.00 867.00 2,700.00 30,000.00 4,000.00
5 Organic Fertilizer Kg/ha 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00
Price NRs./kg 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Value NRs./ha 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 - 4,000.00 4,000.00
6 Chemical Fertilize Kg/ha 80.00 50.00 30.00 60.00 60.00
Price NRs./kg 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Value NRs./ha 2,800.00 1,750.00 1,050.00 - - 2,100.00 2,100.00
7 Phosphorus P Kg/ha 40.00 20.00 10.00 5.00 30.00 30.00
Price NRs./kg 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00
Value NRs./ha 1,600.00 800.00 400.00 200.00 - 1,200.00 1,200.00
8 Potassium K Kg/ha 20.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00
Price NRs./kg 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Value NRs./ha 600.00 300.00 300.00 - - 600.00 600.00
9 Pesticide NRs./ha 300.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 300.00
10 Labour m-d/ha 110.00 80.00 80.00 60.00 60.00 140.00 140.00
Price NRs./m-d 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00
Value NRs./ha 38,500.00 28,000.00 28,000.00 21,000.00 21,000.00 49,000.00 49,000.00
11 Animal Labour m-d/ha 35.00 30.00 30.00 20.00 20.00 40.00 40.00
Price NRs./m-d 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00
Value NRs./ha 14,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 16,000.00 16,000.00
Sub Total NRs./ha 61,600.00 47,550.00 44,962.00 32,067.00 31,700.00 103,200.00 77,200.00
5% Contingency NRs./ha 3,080.00 2,377.50 2,248.10 1,603.35 1,585.00 5,160.00 3,860.00
Total Cost NRs./ha 64,680.00 49,927.50 47,210.10 33,670.35 33,285.00 108,360.00 81,060.00
NET RETURN NRs./ha 320.00 7,072.50 ### ### 1,215.00 31,640.00 44,940.00

31 Crop Budget
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Net Incremental Benefit
Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP,
Location:Simariya, Sunsari
Net benefit "without" project total command area 750 Ha
Areal
Net Total
S. No Crops Coverage

ha NRs./ha NRs
1 Paddy 280.0 320.00 89,600.00
2 Wheat 55.0 7,072.50 388,987.50
3 Maize 50.0 (5,435.10) (271,755.00)
4 Potato 40.0 31,640.00 1,265,600.00
Cropping intensity (%) 56.67% Total 1,472,432.50

Net benefit "with" project


total command area 750 Ha
Areal
Net Return Total Benefit
S. No Crops Coverage

ha NRs./ha NRs
1 Paddy 300 5085.00 1,525,500.00
2 Vegetable (Summer) 80 5565.00 445,200.00
3 Wheat 65 9236.80 600,392.00
Potato 50 31640.00 1,582,000.00
4 Vegetable (Winter) 60 86385.00 5,183,100.00
5 Maize 50 123435.00 6,171,750.00
Cropping intensity (%) 80.67% Total 15,507,942.00

Net incremental benefit : NRs. 14,035,509.50


Cropping intensity without project situation: 56.67%
Cropping intensity with project situation: 80.67%

32 Crop Budget
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Conversion of Financial Cost into Economic Cost


Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP,
Location:Simariya, Sunsari

S.no. Item Financial Cost Conversion factor


1 Construction Cost 16,059,293.76 0.95
2 Maintanance Cost 481,778.81 0.96
Total

Grand Total = 20,425,870.66


VAT = 4,366,576.90
Construction Cost= Total Estimate Cost (minus) VAT
16,059,293.76
Maintenance Cost = 3% of Construction Cost
481,778.81
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Conversion of Financial Cost into Economic Cost

Economic cost(Nrs)
15,256,329.07
462,507.66
15,718,836.73
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP,
Location:Simariya, Sunsari

Economic cost of Construction = Rs 27,602.60 increase in construction cost by 0%


O&M = Rs 836.79
Benefit per year = Rs 15,521.00 decrease in profit by 0% (Rs in Thousand)

Construction Maintenance Total Net Cash Discount PVC at PVB at NPV at Discount PVC at PVB at NPV cost Discount PVC at PVB at
Year at
cost cost Benefit flow at 10% 10% 10% 10% at 12% 12% 12% at 12% 39.29% 39.29%
39.29%
1 13801.30 0.00 0.00 -13801.30 0.91 12559.18 0.00 -12559.18 0.89 12283.16 0.00 -12283.16 0.72 9908.23 0.00
2 13801.30 0.00 6208.40 -7592.90 0.83 11455.08 5152.97 -6302.11 0.8 11041.04 4966.72 -6074.32 0.52 7113.32 3199.87
3 836.79 6208.40 5371.61 0.75 627.60 4656.30 4028.71 0.71 594.12 4407.96 3813.84 0.37 309.63 2297.25
4 836.79 9312.60 8475.81 0.68 569.02 6332.57 5763.55 0.64 535.55 5960.07 5424.52 0.27 222.29 2473.86
5 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.62 518.81 8660.72 8141.91 0.57 476.97 7962.27 7485.30 0.19 159.59 2664.05
6 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.56 468.60 8691.76 8223.16 0.51 426.77 7915.71 7488.95 0.14 114.57 2125.09
7 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.51 426.77 7915.71 7488.95 0.45 376.56 6984.45 6607.89 0.10 82.25 1525.64
8 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.47 393.29 7294.87 6901.58 0.4 334.72 6208.40 5873.68 0.07 59.05 1095.29
9 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.42 351.45 6518.82 6167.37 0.36 301.25 5587.56 5286.32 0.05 42.39 786.33
10 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.39 326.35 6053.19 5726.84 0.32 267.77 4966.72 4698.95 0.04 30.44 564.52
11 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.35 292.88 5432.35 5139.47 0.29 242.67 4501.09 4258.42 0.03 21.85 405.28
12 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.32 267.77 4966.72 4698.95 0.26 217.57 4035.46 3817.89 0.02 15.69 290.96
13 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.29 242.67 4501.09 4258.42 0.23 192.46 3569.83 3377.37 0.01 11.26 208.89
14 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.26 217.57 4035.46 3817.89 0.2 167.36 3104.20 2936.84 0.01 8.09 149.96
15 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.24 200.83 3725.04 3524.21 0.18 150.62 2793.78 2643.16 0.01 5.80 107.66
16 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.22 184.09 3414.62 3230.53 0.16 133.89 2483.36 2349.47 0.00 4.17 77.29
17 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.20 167.36 3104.20 2936.84 0.15 125.52 2328.15 2202.63 0.00 2.99 55.49
18 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.18 150.62 2793.78 2643.16 0.13 108.78 2017.73 1908.95 0.00 2.15 39.84
19 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.16 133.89 2483.36 2349.47 0.12 100.42 1862.52 1762.11 0.00 1.54 28.60
20 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.15 125.52 2328.15 2202.63 0.1 83.68 1552.10 1468.42 0.00 1.11 20.53
29679.36 98061.70 68382.34 7.47 28160.87 83208.10 55047.23 18116.41 18116.41
35
E I R R 39.29%
Benefit/Cost ratio at 10%= 3.30
Benefit/Cost ratio at 12%= 2.95

36
OMIC ANALYSIS

NPV at
39.29%

-9908.23
-3913.45
1987.62
2251.57
2504.47
2010.52
1443.39
1036.24
743.94
534.09
383.43
275.27
197.62
141.88
101.86
73.13
52.50
37.69
27.06
19.43
0.00
37
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP,
Location:Simariya, Sunsari

Economic cost of Construction = Rs 30362.86 increase in construction cost by 10%


O&M = Rs 836.79
Benefit per year = Rs 15521.00 decrease in profit by 0% (Rs in Thousand)
Discount
Construction Maintenance Total Net Cash Discount PVC at PVB at NPV at Discount PVC at PVB at NPV cost PVC at
Year at
cost cost Benefit flow at 10% 10% 10% 10% at 12% 12% 12% at 12% 36.16%
36.16%
1 15181.43 0.00 0.00 -15181.43 0.91 13815.10 0.00 -13815.10 0.89 13511.47 0.00 -13511.47 0.73 11149.34
2 15181.43 0.00 6208.40 -8973.03 0.83 12600.59 5152.97 -7447.61 0.8 12145.14 4966.72 -7178.42 0.54 8188.15
3 836.79 6208.40 5371.61 0.75 627.60 4656.30 4028.71 0.71 594.12 4407.96 3813.84 0.40 331.46
4 836.79 9312.60 8475.81 0.68 569.02 6332.57 5763.55 0.64 535.55 5960.07 5424.52 0.29 243.43
5 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.62 518.81 8660.72 8141.91 0.57 476.97 7962.27 7485.30 0.21 178.77
6 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.56 468.60 8691.76 8223.16 0.51 426.77 7915.71 7488.95 0.16 131.29
7 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.51 426.77 7915.71 7488.95 0.45 376.56 6984.45 6607.89 0.12 96.42
8 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.47 393.29 7294.87 6901.58 0.4 334.72 6208.40 5873.68 0.08 70.81
9 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.42 351.45 6518.82 6167.37 0.36 301.25 5587.56 5286.32 0.06 52.01
10 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.39 326.35 6053.19 5726.84 0.32 267.77 4966.72 4698.95 0.05 38.19
11 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.35 292.88 5432.35 5139.47 0.29 242.67 4501.09 4258.42 0.03 28.05
12 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.32 267.77 4966.72 4698.95 0.26 217.57 4035.46 3817.89 0.02 20.60
13 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.29 242.67 4501.09 4258.42 0.23 192.46 3569.83 3377.37 0.02 15.13
14 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.26 217.57 4035.46 3817.89 0.2 167.36 3104.20 2936.84 0.01 11.11
15 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.24 200.83 3725.04 3524.21 0.18 150.62 2793.78 2643.16 0.01 8.16
16 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.22 184.09 3414.62 3230.53 0.16 133.89 2483.36 2349.47 0.01 5.99
17 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.20 167.36 3104.20 2936.84 0.15 125.52 2328.15 2202.63 0.01 4.40
18 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.18 150.62 2793.78 2643.16 0.13 108.78 2017.73 1908.95 0.00 3.23
19 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.16 133.89 2483.36 2349.47 0.12 100.42 1862.52 1762.11 0.00 2.37
20 836.79 15521.00 14684.21 0.15 125.52 2328.15 2202.63 0.1 83.68 1552.10 1468.42 0.00 1.74
32080.79 98061.70 65980.91 30493.29 83208.10 52714.81 20580.66
38
EIR 36.16%
Benefit/Cost ratio at 10%= 3.06
Benefit/Cost ratio at 12%= 2.73

39
ONOMIC ANALYSIS

PVB at NPV at
36.16% 36.16%

0.00 -11149.34
3348.52 -4839.63
2459.18 2127.72
2709.05 2465.63
2984.32 2805.55
2435.23 2303.93
1788.45 1692.02
1313.45 1242.63
964.60 912.60
708.41 670.22
520.26 492.21
382.08 361.48
280.61 265.48
206.08 194.97
151.35 143.19
111.15 105.16
81.63 77.23
59.95 56.72
44.03 41.65
32.33 30.59
20580.66 0.00
40
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP,
Location:Simariya, Sunsari

Economic cost of Construction Rs 27602.60 increase in construction cost by 0%


O&M = Rs 836.79
Benefit per year = Rs 13968.90 decrease in profit by 10% (Rs in Thousand)
Discount
Construction Maintenanc Total Net Cash Discount PVC at PVB at NPV at Discount PVC at PVB at NPV cost PVC at
Year at
cost e cost Benefit flow at 10% 10% 10% 10% at 12% 12% 12% at 12% 35.62%
35.62%
1 13801.30 0.00 0.00 -13801.30 0.91 12559.18 0.00 -12559.18 0.89 12283.16 0.00 -12283.16 0.74 10176.08
2 13801.30 0.00 5587.56 -8213.74 0.83 11455.08 4637.68 -6817.40 0.8 11041.04 4470.05 -6570.99 0.54 7503.10
3 836.79 5587.56 4750.77 0.75 627.60 4190.67 3563.07 0.71 594.12 3967.17 3373.04 0.40 335.43
4 836.79 8381.34 7544.55 0.68 569.02 5699.31 5130.29 0.64 535.55 5364.06 4828.51 0.30 247.32
5 836.79 12572.01 11735.22 0.62 518.81 7794.65 7275.84 0.57 476.97 7166.05 6689.07 0.22 182.36
6 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.56 468.60 7822.59 7353.98 0.51 426.77 7124.14 6697.38 0.16 134.46
7 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.51 426.77 7124.14 6697.38 0.45 376.56 6286.01 5909.45 0.12 99.14
8 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.47 393.29 6565.38 6172.09 0.4 334.72 5587.56 5252.84 0.09 73.10
9 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.42 351.45 5866.94 5515.49 0.36 301.25 5028.81 4727.56 0.06 53.90
10 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.39 326.35 5447.87 5121.52 0.32 267.77 4470.05 4202.27 0.05 39.74
11 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.35 292.88 4889.12 4596.24 0.29 242.67 4050.98 3808.31 0.04 29.30
12 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.32 267.77 4470.05 4202.27 0.26 217.57 3631.91 3414.35 0.03 21.60
13 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.29 242.67 4050.98 3808.31 0.23 192.46 3212.85 3020.38 0.02 15.93
14 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.26 217.57 3631.91 3414.35 0.2 167.36 2793.78 2626.42 0.01 11.75
15 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.24 200.83 3352.54 3151.71 0.18 150.62 2514.40 2363.78 0.01 8.66
16 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.22 184.09 3073.16 2889.06 0.16 133.89 2235.02 2101.14 0.01 6.39
17 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.20 167.36 2793.78 2626.42 0.15 125.52 2095.34 1969.82 0.01 4.71
18 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.18 150.62 2514.40 2363.78 0.13 108.78 1815.96 1707.17 0.00 3.47
19 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.16 133.89 2235.02 2101.14 0.12 100.42 1676.27 1575.85 0.00 2.56
20 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.15 125.52 2095.34 1969.82 0.1 83.68 1396.89 1313.21 0.00 1.89
29679.36 88255.53 58576.17 28160.87 74887.29 46726.42 18950.86
41
EIR 35.62%
Benefit/Cost ratio at 10%= 2.97
Benefit/Cost ratio at 12%= 2.66

42
NOMIC ANALYSIS

PVB at NPV at
35.62% 35.62%

0.00 -10176.08
3037.69 -4465.41
2239.77 1904.34
2477.16 2229.84
2739.72 2557.37
2244.52 2110.07
1654.95 1555.81
1220.24 1147.14
899.72 845.82
663.39 623.65
489.13 459.83
360.65 339.05
265.92 249.99
196.07 184.32
144.57 135.91
106.59 100.21
78.59 73.89
57.95 54.48
42.73 40.17
31.50 29.62
18950.86 0.00
43
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Name of the project : Birta Paini ISP,
Location:Simariya, Sunsari

Economic cost of Constructi Rs 30362.86 increase in construction cost by 10%


O&M = Rs 836.79
Benefit per year = Rs 13968.90 decrease in profit by 10% (Rs in Thousand)
Mainten Discount
Construction Total Net Cash Discount PVC at PVB at NPV at Discount PVC at PVB at NPV cost PVC at
Year ance at
cost Benefit flow at 10% 10% 10% 10% at 12% 12% 12% at 12% 32.77%
cost 32.77%
1 15181.43 0.00 0.00 -15181.43 0.91 13815.10 0.00 -13815.10 0.89 13511.47 0.00 -13511.47 0.75 11434.36
2 15181.43 0.00 5587.56 -9593.87 0.83 12600.59 4637.68 -7962.91 0.8 12145.14 4470.05 -7675.09 0.57 8612.15
3 836.79 5587.56 4750.77 0.75 627.60 4190.67 3563.07 0.71 594.12 3967.17 3373.04 0.43 357.53
4 836.79 8381.34 7544.55 0.68 569.02 5699.31 5130.29 0.64 535.55 5364.06 4828.51 0.32 269.29
5 836.79 12572.01 11735.22 0.62 518.81 7794.65 7275.84 0.57 476.97 7166.05 6689.07 0.24 202.82
6 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.56 468.60 7822.59 7353.98 0.51 426.77 7124.14 6697.38 0.18 152.76
7 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.51 426.77 7124.14 6697.38 0.45 376.56 6286.01 5909.45 0.14 115.06
8 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.47 393.29 6565.38 6172.09 0.4 334.72 5587.56 5252.84 0.10 86.66
9 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.42 351.45 5866.94 5515.49 0.36 301.25 5028.81 4727.56 0.08 65.27
10 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.39 326.35 5447.87 5121.52 0.32 267.77 4470.05 4202.27 0.06 49.16
11 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.35 292.88 4889.12 4596.24 0.29 242.67 4050.98 3808.31 0.04 37.03
12 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.32 267.77 4470.05 4202.27 0.26 217.57 3631.91 3414.35 0.03 27.89
13 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.29 242.67 4050.98 3808.31 0.23 192.46 3212.85 3020.38 0.03 21.00
14 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.26 217.57 3631.91 3414.35 0.2 167.36 2793.78 2626.42 0.02 15.82
15 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.24 200.83 3352.54 3151.71 0.18 150.62 2514.40 2363.78 0.01 11.92
16 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.22 184.09 3073.16 2889.06 0.16 133.89 2235.02 2101.14 0.01 8.97
17 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.20 167.36 2793.78 2626.42 0.15 125.52 2095.34 1969.82 0.01 6.76
18 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.18 150.62 2514.40 2363.78 0.13 108.78 1815.96 1707.17 0.01 5.09
19 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.16 133.89 2235.02 2101.14 0.12 100.42 1676.27 1575.85 0.00 3.83
20 836.79 13968.90 13132.11 0.15 125.52 2095.34 1969.82 0.1 83.68 1396.89 1313.21 0.00 2.89
32080.79 88255.53 56174.74 30493.29 74887.29 44394.00 21486.26
44
EIR 32.77%
Benefit/Cost ratio at 10%= 2.75
Benefit/Cost ratio at 12%= 2.46

45
ONOMIC ANALYSIS

PVB at NPV at
32.77% 32.77%

0.00 -11434.36
3169.72 -5442.43
2387.37 2029.84
2697.19 2427.90
3047.21 2844.38
2550.11 2397.35
1920.69 1805.64
1446.63 1359.97
1089.57 1024.30
820.65 771.49
618.10 581.07
465.54 437.65
350.63 329.63
264.09 248.27
198.91 186.99
149.81 140.84
112.84 106.08
84.99 79.90
64.01 60.18
48.21 45.32
21486.26 0.00
46

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen