Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
COURSE OVERVIEW
The meanings, roles, and impacts of culture in human learning and development are
central questions across social science disciplines and have figured centrally in
psychological and educational research. For a long time there have been divides between
what people think, how people think and individuals social-emotional development. Over
the past 30 or more years a significant shift has occurred unearthing studies of social and
material arrangements of activity and their impacts on learning and development. This
shift in foci is often described as situative perspectives on learning and development and
has been taken up in a multitude of ways. Although there is on-going debate, it is
increasingly accepted that what people think and how people think form a reciprocal
relationship that is sculpted by the daily activities, discursive practices, participation
structures, and emergent identities that shape development over the life course. The
study of culture, learning, and development from this perspective focuses on systemic
interactions between ideas, beliefs, values, artifacts, social practices and ecological
environments that comprise what we might call cultural ecosystems. Critically, these
different dimensions co-develop and may reinforce one another in ways that make it hard
and perhaps even irrelevant to give explanatory priority to any single factor or dimension.
From this view, socialization and learning depends on interactions and subsequent
meaning making between individuals as well as an individuals interpretation of,
participation in and responses to their environment. Increasingly these perspectives are
being applied to the study of a variety of domains.
In this course we will explore influential contemporary research and theory that view
culture as foundational to learning and development. We will engage scholarship that has
taken up the study of these issues in a range of settings (classrooms, informal
environments, families, early childhood to adult learners, etc) and within specific
domains, for example in science, literacy, and mathematics. As a continual thread we will
explore how views/understandings of culture of human learning and development carry
implications for practice, scholarship and policy.
The seminar will heavily rely on readings and discussion and we will spend significant
chunks of time: (a) analyzing and discussing the focal texts and their implications and (b)
collectively delving into text of your choosing.
1
ASSIGNMENTS
1. Readings, Class Discussions, Activities. All class members are expected to have
read the assigned reading for the week to actively participate in the discussions
and activities each week. This is crucial for a graduate seminar of this size and
purpose. Also, you will need to check on the readings as we continue during the
quarter. I will likely change them depending upon the trajectory of our class. For
each reading, I ask that you each come to class prepared with at least one question
or issue to bring up for discussion (related to the next assignment) and one
specific place in the text to draw attention to.
5. Study Group and Group Presentation/Paper. There have been many, many,
people over the course of human history to consider what culture is. The field of
education has its intellectual geneology both in scholarship and the unfolding
social dynamics of history. As part of this course you will form groups of 5 and
take up a core social theorist, read a critical text of theirs, write a 5-page co-
authored paper due in week 9, and make a final presentation in class about the
thinker in week 11. I have made suggestions about who to take up however you
will submit a proposal with your group member in week 3 and may propose
alternative texts. Further you will be given some time in class to discuss the work
together.
2
c) Week 4, 6, 8, and 10 (to prepare for Week 11) you will be given 30
minutes to work in your study groups.
d) Week 9 Co-authored paper of thinkers major points and implications is
due.
e) Week 11 Class Presentation
GRADING POLICY
Academic Accommodations
Your experience in this class is important to us, and it is the policy and practice of the
University of Washington to create inclusive and accessible learning environments
consistent with federal and state law. If you experience barriers based on disability,
please seek a meeting with DRS to discuss and address them. If you have already
established accommodations with DRS, please communicate your approved
3
accommodations to your instructor at your earliest convenience so we can discuss your
needs in this course.
Disability Resources for Students (DRS) offers resources and coordinates reasonable
accommodations for students with disabilities. Reasonable accommodations are
established through an interactive process between you, your instructor(s) and DRS. If
you have not yet established services through DRS, but have a temporary or permanent
disability that requires accommodations (this can include but not limited to; mental
health, attention-related, learning, vision, hearing, physical or health impacts), you are
welcome to contact DRS at206-543-8924 or uwdrs@uw.edu or disability.uw.edu.
This session will provide an introduction to the people, purposes, themes, and activities
of this course. We will start by discussing initial ideas relevant to the course.
Watch: Babies
Read:
1. Bang, M. (2014) Culture and Learning. A Synthesis Brief for Practioners.
2. Gutirrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits
or repertoires of practice. Educational researcher, 32(5), 19-25.
1. Nasir, N. I. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a
cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. The Cambridge handbook of
the learning sciences, 489-504.
4
2. Engestrm, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations,
findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1-24.
4. Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social
spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education,
34(1), 329-394.
Recommended Readings:
Engestrm, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical
reconceptualization. Journal of education and work, 14(1), 133-156.
3. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the
world?. Behavioral and brain sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83.
Recommended Readings:
Cole, M. (1998). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University
Press. Chapters 2 & 4
Elder, G. H., & Rockwell, R. C. (1979). The life-course and human development: An
ecological perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2(1), 1-21.
5
Week 6, October 29 Conceptualizing Culture and Cognitive Development
Recommended Readings:
Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in
ecosocial systems. Mind, culture, and activity, 7(4), 273-290.
1. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for
cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98(2), 224.
3. Umaa Taylor, A. J., Quintana, S. M., Lee, R. M., Cross, W. E., Rivas Drake, D.,
Schwartz, S. J., ... & Seaton, E. (2014). Ethnic and Racial Identity During
Adolescence and Into Young Adulthood: An Integrated Conceptualization. Child
development, 85(1), 21-39.
Recommended Reading:
Saxe, G. B. (2003). Ethnic and academic identities: A cultural practice perspective on
emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educational
Researcher, 32(5), 14-18.
Recommended Reading:
Luke, A., Iyer, R., & Doherty, C. (2011). Literacy education in the context of
globalisation. Handbook of Research on Teaching of English Language Arts, 3rd Ed.
6
Week 9, November 19 Culture and Learning Science
1. Rosebery, A. S., Ogonowski, M., dischino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). The coat
traps all your body heat: Heterogeneity as Fundamental to Learning. The journal
of the learning sciences, 19(3), 322-357.
2. Bell, P., Tzou, C., Bricker, L., & Baines, A. D. (2013). Learning in diversities of
structures of social practice: Accounting for how, why and where people learn
science. Human Development, 55(5-6), 269-284.
3. Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2013). Desettling
expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5-6), 302-318.
Recommended Readings:
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science
education. Journal of research in science teaching, 38(3), 296-316.
Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting
the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008-1026.
2. Cobb, P., & Hodge, L. L. (2011). Culture, identity, and equity in the mathematics
classroom. In A journey in mathematics education research (pp. 179-195).
Springer Netherlands.
Recommended Reading:
Saxe, G. B. (2002). Children's developing mathematics in collective practices: A
framework for analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2-3), 275-300.
Huntsinger, C. S., Jose, P. E., Liaw, F. R., & Ching, W. D. (1997). Cultural differences in
early mathematics learning: A comparison of Euro-American, Chinese-American, and
Taiwan-Chinese families. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21(2), 371-
388.
7
Week 11, December 3 Study Groups Final Presentations