7, March report format and submission process ‘7-1 Use of Portal for Report prenaration and submission For ease of use this Report is developed in an electronic format and published on the SIP-Skills Portal, Each OT member has access to the system and will have been provided with a unique user name and password. The URL can be found at hitps://SIP-Skills.onlineof.t ‘72 Section 1: Information quality OTs should complete the folowing table by refering to the data on the Portal for your occupation: yy bet Moy Plow Dee: ater 4 category Notina Information | Additional | Source? ‘Attachment position to broadly Information | Reference available ‘evaluate correct ‘provided for new = ion lacro-economic Te weak oe Wk [po 066 ‘Expansion demand Rosear JL opacoa damaR iaes Total demand 13% ove Pama To RETO aaa + Estimated shortage/ year a eal optics a Belaes clove] demand for skill ‘Supply — side information (per, pathway/overview) [C ications Enrolment Projected enrolment Graduation Projected graduation ‘Workplace (learnerships) ee eT e41) LL HL 18s HO a wonredwicy =} Weagl souypew jexo., ah seurypew jo sodA se'd papaau soyesado ejo, senowiny yers jEWON sioyerado ye301 (Goveyee) ewion Bum suondunssy ‘Souypeus yoyo,Problem weichtina on the demand side Other: Problem classification ‘Spacial reasons such as; 4._ Years of experience required Le. not novices 2. Specific ivel of expertise required (e.g. engineer, technologist, technician) '3._Speaific typo of expertise required in Lovell Rocpiueer rg |g 2. Ldvacey 4 Nuiwicey O} a Co 4, Employment equily consideration (acelgender) '5._ Wago rates not compaiitive 6. Geographical considerations (e.g. remote areas) Funding = we 7. Poor! ‘conaitions (e.g. mining industry) 8. Authority of technical specialists in relation to managerial decision making ‘9. Funded vacancies in the public servica: 10, Other? Speci. Problem welghting on the supply side (by pathway) T._Dislocated pathway trom institution to workplace Ingufiient graduates duo fo 2._Insufficient learners enrolling TO "2c '3._Insufficient number of good training faciilies 4, Throughput problams due to: i, Learners poorly prepared at eniry_ ji, Poor quality lecturing, trainer, mentor ii, Poor quality / relevance of qualification iv. Poor quality [relevance of curriculum v. Poor quality learning materials vi, Poor quail juipment in laboratory / workshop ‘vi. Poor relationship with employers. vil. Poor institutional capac e.g. 168 ix. Financial constraints o 5._Not enc work experience ities. ) 6. Poor quality workplace learning opportunities: xD 7. Insufficient numbers of leamers attaining full recognition of competence (0.9. passing trade test or oO attaining professional registration or occupation license) after relevant work experience (8. Duration of siudy or acquisition of experlence © ‘8. Dislocation of efforts between different supply ‘agencies (e.g. government agencies, suppliers, ° providers and workplaces atc.) 40. Other? Specify. oS Problem weighting w.r.t, Information failure 71, Leamers do not know about the occupation 2. Graduates unable to find workplace opportunities ‘3. Qualified people cannot find employment. 46 ccannal find competent, qualified people ‘6. Other? Specify. 33 é bigcots Conbrebues Kibale: 26% i | iProbtern tree: ‘Occupational Teams should present their problem analysis as a problem tree: Sexe Moekeck‘.38ection 3: Problem vrioritication OTs are required to prioritise the problems they have Identified on the previous page. Priorily problems ‘Weighting Demand side ‘Supply side. At the interface Note that once this table has been completed it will be possible for the system to generate a graph such as the one illustrated in section 4.2 of the Guideline. 7A Section 4: Solution design and scheduling OTs can list their priority problems and alongside list their proposed solutions together with an analysis of how long it will take to implement them, together with an estimation of the cost, Duraflon for Preciypebioms | Prentysotuons | _impemantation fom eerimniemenstoe Prioly problem 1 }-3-—Ust Prioaty problem 2 | —4—Ust Parity problem 3 |-f-—ist Proriy problem 4 | J—ESt Peerty pobems |p ~E8 OTs are requested to complete the following table by factoring in the duration of time it will take for the solution to be evident on the ground: Priori ‘Short term impact | Medium term Longer term Priority problems | st ritias delivered impact delivered | impact delivered (2044) (2015 2019) (2020 +) Pilonty problem 1 -——-—Ust Piorty probiem 2 | —3-—Hist Prionty problem 3 | —3-—tist Priory problem 4 | —1- tet Prionty problem 5 -—3-—Hst When considering short term solutions, consideration should be given to SETA commitments for 2014/6 and 2015/6 which can be found on the Portal in the Document Library. 35Tarosts and/or milestones should be indicated: Priority “Short term impact | Medium term Longer term probleme | Prlority solutions (2014) Impact (2015- | Impact delivered targets 2049) targets | (2020 +) targets Priority 7 List o Bean Profily2 | 3. List Fe 5. List 6 Priority @—[_7._List Priory 3 ‘9_tist PriontyS — [-6- It should now be possible to indicate what should be done by when to meet the targets: ‘Aciivities (From priority Timeline solutions) or [2018 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 [2020 ‘Short termi impacts = What naeds to be done? List = When? “Medion term impacts? - + What needs to be done? = When? Longer ferm impacis? ~ What needs to be done? = When? ‘And then the allocation of responsibility for each action: Priory Short term impact | Medium term ‘Longer term pro Priority solutions (2014) (2018-2010) | delivered (2020 +) lems responsibility | responsibility | responsibility Priority 7 itis 2. Priority 2 3. 4. Priory |S. Ca Prioly 4 7._Ust 8. 9. List Priority & 7suoyesadQ juejg Suaowyye3 — dau, Wa|qo1dSIepPaU! 943 12 Ayunuwos s}]1s BY} 404 saBuayjeys Aquold ; | _ apis Ajddns 343 uo | apis puewap © AyuNUMWOD s]D}s | ayy qe Ayunuuos 243 10} SaBuayeyo | {S BY} 105 AQUOMd | saBuajeyo Ao !