Department of Teacher Education & Learning Sciences
Elementary Education Program
Formal Observation Reflection
Directions: Complete the reflection questions and submit your response to your observer prior to having a post- conference to discuss the observation. If a conference is held immediately after the observation you will submit your responses to the observer the following day via email.
Name: Elise Saenger-Heyl Date: November 10, 2017
1. To what extent were learning outcomes appropriate and achievable to your students? My learning outcomes were appropriate and achievable as students were able to successfully converse about the history of the North Carolina Constitution. As students read and discovered new information, they could converse in small group and whole- group, looking at new ideas of taxation and government structure, and seeing how these affect a constitution. Students were also able to see how history affects a legal document, and the changes that came out of that. 2. How effective were your instructional strategies? What changes would you make in your instructional approaches if you taught this lesson again? Why? My instructional strategies were effective in taking a complex topic and allowing students to engage with the material. Using a jigsaw reading gave support to those for whom reading is not a strength and gave the opportunity to engage for students who were able to easily read and understand. Involving movement with the tableau activity gave students a chance to summarize their understanding and engage with the material. 3. Evaluate the effectiveness of your oral and written communication with students. (Consider how well you communicated learning objectives, clarity of directions, use of standard English, quality of questions and effectiveness of discussion techniques.) I was able to communicate with all students by circulating around the room during the jigsaw activity. This allowed me to see progress and provide probing questions to those needing more assistance. I gave instructions orally and provided them in written form on a PowerPoint. This allowed for more success with a complicated activity such as a tableau. I also engaged students in small group discussions during the jigsaw and in whole-group discussions to summarize the jigsaw. 4. Evaluate the level of student engagement in your lesson . (Consider how you presented the content/skills, the activities and assignments for students, grouping of students, and structure and pacing of the lesson.) The majority of students were engaged with the lesson. Most students found at least one part of the lesson, either with reading, taking notes, discussing, or with the tableau movement activity. These activities were helpful in providing a variety of different ways to gain conceptual understanding. Some students were less engaged or had difficulty working with their group during the jigsaw. For these students, more support was needed to help them begin to engage, either through their peers or through probing questions. 5. How effectively did you use instructional materials, resources, and/or technology? Technology was used throughout to provide instructions and information. A PowerPoint was presented throughout the lesson to provide information and avoid confusion. The PowerPoint also laid out learning outcomes and specific instructions. Other resources used included a written article on the history of the North Carolina Constitution, a graphic organizer to help students organize thinking, and a paper on which students could record thinking on the warm-up activity. 6. To what extent were your assessment strategies effective? What changes would you make in your assessment approach if you taught this lesson again? Why? My assessment strategies were effective, as students were able to engage in conversation about history and its effects of government, and therefore the constitution. This was aided by the assessment of probing questions. Graphic organizer responses were also effective in gauging student understanding. I would include another summary assessment, likely a writing opportunity, in which students could think about how history changed the constitution to reinforce these connections. 7. To what extent was your feedback to students accurate, substantive, constructive, specific, and/or timely? Feedback to students was given in a timely manner, as I was able to circulate around the room as students were working. I was also able to give feedback during the whole- group discussion occurring after the jigsaw. Feedback included probing questions, specific comments on historical implications, and discussions of effects of amendments to the constitution. 8. To what extent did the classroom management and environment contribute to student learning? (Consider your classroom procedures, your use of physical space, and the students conduct.) Classroom management was vital to ensuring the success of the lesson. Students were placed in groups specifically to ensure mixed abilities and personalities that would work well together. Most groups were successful, and those that were not just required additional support from peers or from myself. 9. Did you make modifications to your lesson plan during the lesson? If so, what were they and what motivated these changes? I made one modification to my lesson plan. After the student did the jigsaw read of the article for the history of the NC constitution, I used the PowerPoint to record what they shared out, so that it would be accessible to the whole class. Using this to record their thoughts, I was able to use their language so that the information displayed to their classmates came directly from the students themselves. This proved to them the importance of their jigsaw activity and projecting it for the whole class made it accessible for all students. 10. Was your Teaching Behavior Focus goal met? My teaching behavior of providing higher order questioning was met during the discussion with students after the jigsaw activity, and throughout the small group work during the jigsaw activity. As we came across new topics and ideas that required analysis to understand, I brought it up to the whole class to discuss. This led to discussions about different events in history related to North Carolina government.