Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SL - PGSEM Q1 10-11
Instructor
Prof J Ramachandran
Table of Contents
Context/Background........................................................................................................ 3
Characteristics of Pharma Industry ................................................................................. 3
Indian Pharma Industry ................................................................................................... 7
Indian Market .................................................................................................................. 9
History and current Indian market ................................................................................ 9
Pre-Patent Regime ................................................................................................... 9
Post Patent Regime................................................................................................ 12
Acute vs. Chronic ................................................................................................... 13
M& A activities in Indian Pharma Industry ..................................................................... 14
Why are MNC’s interested in Indian Pharma Companies ............................................. 15
Reasons for Indian Pharma Companies to merge/partner ............................................ 23
Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 23
Page 2 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
Context/Background
The Indian pharmaceutical industry is the world's second-largest by volume and is likely to
lead the manufacturing sector of India. India's bio-tech industry clocked a 17 percent growth
with revenues of Rs.137 billion ($3 billion) in the 2009-10 financial year over the previous
fiscal. Bio-pharma is the biggest contributor generating 60 percent of the industry's growth at
Rs.8,829 crore, followed by bio-services at Rs.2,639 crore and bio-agri at Rs.1,936 crore.
The first pharmaceutical company - Bengal Chemicals and Pharmaceutical Works, which
still exists today as one of 5 government-owned drug manufacturers, appeared in Calcutta in
1930. For the next 60 years, most of the drugs in India were imported by multinationals
either in fully-formulated or bulk form. The government started to encourage the growth of
drug manufacturing by Indian companies in the early 1960s, and with the Patents Act in
1970, enabled the industry to become what it is today. This patent act removed composition
patents from food and drugs, and though it kept process patents, these were shortened to a
period of five to seven years. The lack of patent protection made the Indian market
undesirable to the multinational companies that had dominated the market, and while they
streamed out, Indian companies started to take their places.
India's growing respect and legal / regulatory framework for IPR, favorable economic
policies resulting into attractive investment destination and availability of huge talent pool
for sustaining and growing operations is making India an attractive destination for
multinationals now.
The recent acquistion of Piramal by Abott makes foreign companies three of the top five
drugmakers in the country--and multinational drugmakers together now command 25
percent of the domestic drug market.
Multinationals' share of the market is only expected to grow. This trend reverses the gains
that Indian drugmakers have made over the last few decades. Some Indian drugmakers grew
so much that they began snapping up companies on other continents to gain strength in
markets such as the U.S. and Europe. The pharma industry became a source of pride for
Indian economic boosters. Now that generics and emerging markets are all the rage among
Big Pharma--which is looking to diversify to soften the oncoming onslaught of competition
for some mega-blockbuster meds--drugmakers are buying up and tying up in India.
Here, we analyze in detail the industry, markets, players, growth areas and recent
acquisitions to understand the rationale behind these mergers and acquisitions. We also try to
identify the key parameters that are causing the pharma sector to see further M&A activities.
Page 3 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
The Indian pharmaceutical industry is estimated at $19.4 billion (including exports). In 2008,
the domestic formulations market contributed only 1 per cent in value terms to global
pharmaceuticals market due to lower drug penetration and lower drug prices vis-à-vis the
developed markets such as US and Europe.
India’s healthcare spending is around 6 per cent of the total gross domestic product of India.
Bulk drugs can be defined as the raw materials used to make formulations.
Formulations (drugs) can be defined as the end products that are administered to consumers
i.e. the diseased population, and are ready-to-use forms of bulk drugs (including capsules,
tablets, syrups and injections).
Bulk drugs or active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are made from two or more
chemicals or intermediaries. Bulk drugs are intended to have a direct effect on the diagnosis,
cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of a disease. Out of the total Indian pharmaceutical
market in 2008-09, formulations account for around 65 per cent and bulk drugs for the
balance 35 per cent in value terms.
Page 4 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
Concentrated manufacturing
In geographic terms, manufacturing operations are largely concentrated in Maharashtra,
Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh. However, many players have shifted their manufacturing bases
to excise free zones like Baddi (Himachal Pradesh), Haridwar (Uttaranchal) and Sikkim due
to the shift towards MRP based excise duty levy.
Page 5 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
Per capita annual drug expenditure in India was around $3 as compared to $412 and $191 in
Japan and US, respectively. This can be attributed to India’s large population and declining
health expenditure as a percentage of total government expenditure in India.
In India, majority (around 80 per cent) of the patients pay out of their pocket. Only 3 per
cent of the population is covered under health insurance. Unlike US, India does not have a
strong health insurance sector to share the healthcare cost with the patients.
Conversely, in the US, consumers do not directly pay for the medicines. Here, government
organisations and managed care organisations reimburse most of the drug cost to the patients.
However, with rising drug expenditure, patients are being asked to taken on a larger share of
their healthcare expenses. This has prompted consumers to opt for generic drugs over high
priced branded drugs.
Page 6 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
Pharmaceutical companies in India are growing at a very fast pace and this has made the
Indian pharmaceutical industry as the second largest growing industry. Also the
pharmaceutical industry in India is the third largest in the world, which will be of US$20
billion by 2015. Mergers and acquisitions are the part of this growth. The compounded
annual growth rate of pharma in India is 12-15% and the global figures are 4-7% for the
period of 2008-2013. With such a profound growth of pharmaceutical companies in India
numerous pharmaceutical jobs can be seen. This in turn is helping biotechnology industry
and booming the biotechnology jobs in India.
The “organized” sector of India's pharmaceutical industry consists of 250 to 300 companies,
which account for 70 percent of products on the market, with the top 10 firms representing
30 percent. However, the total sector is estimated at nearly 20,000 businesses, some of
which are extremely small. Approximately 75 percent of India's demand for medicines is
met by local manufacturing.
Indian players have been looking to establish and enhance their presence in the US market
by obtaining ANDA approvals, which are mandatory to enter the retail market.
Page 7 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
The new patent regime has also led to the return of the pharmaceutical multinationals, many
of which had left India during the 1970s. Now they are back, and looking at India not only
for its traditional strengths in contract manufacturing but also as a highly attractive location
for research and development (R&D), particularly in the conduct of clinical trials and other
services.
Both multinational companies (MNCs) and domestic players are also examining the
prospects offered by the local market as the government moves forward with initiatives
aimed at providing India's more than one billion inhabitants, for the first time, with access to
the life-saving drugs they need. A further huge boost to the local market is coming from the
rise of India's new affluent consumers, who lead more Western-style lives and are
demanding innovative drugs to treat the chronic illnesses that these changing lifestyles may
produce. India's leading drug manufacturers are becoming global players, utilizing both
organic growth, through the gradual development of their business, and mergers and
acquisitions (M&A) as they seek to boost their presence in existing markets and open up
new ones.
Following inflection points could be seen in the growth of Indian Pharma Industry –
Page 8 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
Indian Market
Pre-Patent Regime
Pre 1970s
The immediate post-independence era saw the Pharma industry in its nascent form. Most of
the critical drugs were still being imported form abroad. In order to improve self reliance, the
Govt. embarked on a process of creating home grown pharma companies. Hindustan
Antibiotics Ltd and Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd were a result of such aspirations.
The local manufacturing was highly fractured with around 2000 odd players. The field
however was dominated by MNCs who imported formulations from abroad.
Page 9 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
1970 - 1979
Two major developments during this time period influenced the nature of the industry for the
next three decades
Indian Patents Act 1970
This act created a patent regime in the country wherein only manufacturing processes were
protected by patents. The product itself was not protected by a patent. The result of this was
that the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient ( API ) was not protected by patent. This resulted
in many Indian manufacturers producing bulk drugs through their own customized process.
This was a major blow to MNCs whose strength lie in the discovery and commercializing
of innovative APIs.
Drug Price Control Order ( DPCO ) 1970
The other major law that was passed during this era was the DPCO which brought in the
regulation of the prices of many critical drugs. There were two major results from this new
law
Decline in share of multinationals
- Multinationals found that their major block buster drugs were no longer
profitable due to the price control
- Multinationals found it hard to compete due to the new regulations.
- They hence focused on therapeutic preparations like vitamins and pain killers.
- However MNCs continued to build their brand equity in the country.
- The Foreign Exchange Regulations Act (FERA) in 1974 also saw the MNCs
needing to dilute their equity holdings
Growth of Small Scale Industries ( Pharma Companies )
There was a spurt in small pharma firms in the country due to the following reason.
- Low entry barrier
- Abundant bulk drugs available to be imported.
- Govt. support for small scale industries to improve employment and self-
sufficiency.
1979 - 1987
This era saw the number of drugs under DPCO reduced from 347 to 163. Additionally the
mark up limit allowed for retail sales changed from 40-60% to 70-100%. This improved the
profitability of the pharma companies allowing them to channel the surplus funds for
further expansion, both domestically and internationally.
The key features of this era are,
Page 10 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
1987 - 1994
Continuing on the growth path set in the 80s, the Pharma industry improved on its API
exports which grew at a CAGR of 40% during the 1987-94 period. Additionally, the
formulations market saw increased growth as the profitability of bulk drugs decreased
Investments increased in capacity from Rs.7000 Mil to Rs 13800 Mil
The most important aspect of this period was the liberalization of economy by Narasimha
Rao Govt. It reduced tariff barriers for MNCs. These actions saw renewed interest of MNCs
in the Indian market. The advantages for the Indian Pharma companies by the new laws was
that they were freer to import equipment and bulk drug intermediaries which improved their
own competitiveness in the exports market. What this era also saw was increased
competition from small domestic players which now increased from 10,000 to 20,000.
1994 -2004
The number of drugs under DPCO was further reduced from 146 to 74 during this time with
only 40% of the market was covered by DPCO. This opened the field once again for
profitability. Additionally India joined WTO. The TRIPS regime which would make
product patent protection effective from 2005 was introduced. This increased interest
from multinationals who found entry into the Indian market by way of increased equity in
partnerships. E.g. Eli Lilly-Ranbaxy , Sanofi-Torrent etc. The MNCs viewed India as both
a market and low cost mfg hub. These can also be seen as part of the global consolidation
of pharma industry that affects India too.
As a part of the coming patent regime Indian companies had reinvent themselves. The Indian
companies started to have a global outlook by setting shop overseas throught JVs. There was
also focus on improve of capabilities to make them world class. The generics market in
developed countries especially the US through ANDA filings became a major source of
revenue and competitiveness for Indian Pharmas. Another key change in India industry was
the development of clinical trials in India to help MNCs reduce development costs. Many
companies including Piramal see this as a key growth sector.
Page 11 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
The overall industry profitability was reduced during this period due to high competition in
the bulk drugs space. This has seen companies increase their presence in the formulation.
Page 12 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
Due to their nature and prevalence, acute disease drugs see a lot of sales but also see intense
competition as wells as reduced margins. Conversely, chronic ailments see higher margins.
India has historically been a country where the acute disease treatment has mostly been the
focus of the Pharma industry. However increasing economic prosperity has seen the share of
chronic treatment increase. This is expected to continue in the years to come as shown in the
below data,
The nature and competition in the acute disease space requires the presence of a robust
sales force as well as a good distribution network in order for a company to be successful.
Page 13 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
There is a major amount of path dependency in developing these capabilities. The Indian
Pharma players have developed these through the years, when they had to expand into the
Indian market.
The recent past has seen a spate of M&As in the Indian Pharma market. Where the Indian
Pharma companies were once the hunters, acquiring small Pharma companies abroad, the
tables have now turned with Indian companies being acquired by global majors in multi-
million dollar deals. Given below is list of recent acquisitions.
Of these, the biggest deal yet, has been the acquisition of Piramal Healthcare by Abbott Labs.
Piramal itself has been famous for using the acquisition way to grow. A $30.8-billion
pharma major pays $3.72 billion for a 7 per cent share of a highly-fragmented $8 billion
(around Rs 42,000 crore) Indian pharmaceutical market. This has been controversial in some
circles who see the valuation to be on the higher side. However, Miles D. White, Chairman
of the 120-year old Abbott Laboratories, feels the $2.12 billion upfront payment plus $1.2
billion over four years (starting from 2011) is indeed money well spent.
"India pharmaceutical sales are expected to more than double in the next five years.
With this acquisition, Abbott gains immediate market leadership in India. Abbott India
expects sales to exceed $2.5 billion by 2020 (up from just Rs 761 crore or around $162
million that it reported for the year ended November 2009)."
Page 14 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
Mr. Piramal prefers to see the transaction as a transfer of assets rather than a sell-out,
as he still has seven other businesses and 11 other plants to run. The primary focus of
the Piramals is now molecule research and clinical research.
Abbott see the following rationales behind the acquisition,
- Acquire Indian pharma industry's largest sales force of around 4000.
- Piramal has one of the fastest growth rates of 17.5 per cent (against the
industry's of a little under 14 per cent)
- Piramla boasts portfolio of 350 branded generics, including such bestselling
brands as Stemetil (to treat dizziness/ vertigo) and Stator (a statin drug to
check cholesterol). Growth in capabilities in generics is seen by
- Leverage low-cost manufacturing abilities. Buyout includes Piramal
Healthcare's plant at Baddi in Himachal Pradesh, a facility approved by the
US Food and Drug Administration.
- Emerging top dog virtually overnight. Was till then the behind most
companies in India.
The flip side of these acquisitions as feared by Mr.Hamied from Cipla is that the
MNCs will launch new-generation drugs at high prices; one way to bring down those
prices, he feels, is for the government to impose a pragmatic compulsory licensing
system and to allow Indian pharma companies to copy innovator drugs after paying a
royalty to the innovator company.
Page 15 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
Organic growth can deliver only limited market share gains; even in a fragmented market,
<3% market share may be sub-optimal to deliver long-term strategic goals.
While sales of top pharma companies have grown marginally at a CAGR of 1.6 per cent
during 2004 to 2008, their operating margins have plummeted from 27 per cent in 2004 to
19.7 per cent in 2008.
Operating Margins of top 5 Pharma players
Page 16 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
Cost Arbitrage
The cost of manufacturing in India is significantly lower as compared to that of US and
Europe. Global Pharma companies, which are looking for cost competitive destinations, can
reduce their cost substantially by outsourcing bulk drug manufacturing to India or China.
Quality
Indian Pharma Companies account for nearly 50 per cent of DMF filings
Page 17 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
This rise in proportion suggests that Indian players have been able to maintain the required
quality standards to export to the regulated markets.
Page 18 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
Page 19 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
Even though presently acute therapies account for over 68 per cent of the total domestic
formulations market, in the next 5 years, it is expected to move toward the chronic portfolio.
Chronic drugs give higher returns, and players in this segment are more likely to outperform
the industry and register strong growth.
Leading Indian players in chronic therapies – Sun, Torrent, USV, Lupin, Zydus and
Unichem.
Page 20 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
An MNC player would typically look for the following complementary assets:
As already discussed in the section “Acute vs Chronic”, Piramal’s strong sales force
helps Abbott improve its reach. At the same time it brings in complementary assets in
the form of drugs for chronic illnesses. Thus with both strengths in acute and the
chronic market, Abbott is well positioned to dominate the market.
Page 21 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
Value Innovation
World over, major Pharma companies are known for their expertise in new drug creation.
Conversely, by virtue of the process patent regime, large Indian Pharma companies in India
have mastered re-engineering and process innovation. This coupled with the low cost
manufacturing advantage of India, MNCs that acquire India companies can leverage India as
a manufacturing hub. This is especially true for the patented innovator drugs which MNCs
were apprehensive to bring into the country, but with the new product patent regime in place,
they can now become price leaders in the innovator drug categories.
Page 22 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
4- Attractive valuations
o Piramal–Abbott transaction at 9x sales
o Ranbaxy–Daiichi transaction at 5x sales
Conclusion
Based on our analysis, we have come to the conclusion that the following are the key reasons
for active M&A activity,
Existence of complimentary assets between the local sales force/ process
capabilities of Pharma companies and innovator drugs of MNCs.
Attractiveness of India as a market
Ability to improve the value offered to customers through value innovation.
We also conclude that this trend of M&As will continue in the near future.
Hence we have the following recommendations which can serve as guidelines
for MNCs looking for acquisitions.
Page 23 of 24
M&A: Indian Pharma Industry
References –
1. Crisil Research reports on Pharma Statistics, Pharma Opinion and State of the industry
www.crisil.com
www.idfc.com
Page 24 of 24