Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Author(s): se Innes-Ker
Source: Music and the Moving Image, Vol. 8, No. 2 (Summer 2015), pp. 58-68
Published by: University of Illinois Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/musimoviimag.8.2.0058
Accessed: 08-10-2017 13:11 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
University of Illinois Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Music and the Moving Image
This content downloaded from 78.184.153.237 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:11:20 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Film and Music in Laboratory Experiments:
Emotion Induction
se Innes-Ker
Abstract. Emotion researchers have long used clips from commercial movies to
experimentally elicit emotional states. This paper describes how the Niedenthal
laboratory selected and tested emotion-eliciting movie clips, and presents data on
the clips effectiveness. A summary of published databases of emotion-eliciting
movies is presented and discussed.
A movie is a conspicuous example of un- how they work.3 (Although see inroads made
natural stimuli. Researchers thought mov- by film psychologists such as Ed Tan and
ies would provide the solution to the chal- Greg Smith.4)
lenge they face. Movies are make-believe I will first orient the reader in how psy-
devices that popular wisdom identifies chologists conceptualize emotion both theo-
as natural emotion elicitors. However,
retically and more pragmatically. I then sum-
the way in which movies cause emotions
marize different elicitation methods before
is not a solution, but more of a research
problem in itself. Movies probably con- describing in detail work done in the Nie-
stitute the least natural set of stimuli ever denthal lab using music and films as emotion
produced. ... The emotions of movie elicitors. Finally I present several validated
audiences are filtered and interfered with databases of emotion-eliciting movie clips.
by extremely sophisticated forms of media
literacy. The assumption that movies au- Theoretical Background
tomatically elicit pure, ancestral, midbrain
basic emotions impervious to neocortical Cognition while Emotional
processes would seem too nave from both Early research on how emotions influence
the evolutionary and psychological points cognition was based on Gordon Bowers
of view.1 network theory of emotion.5 At the time,
semantic-network theories were quite use-
Emotion researchers have spent decades
ful for understanding cognitive phenom-
mapping how emotional states alter cogni-
ena such as priming.6 A standard example
tive processeshow we remember, think,
is that seeing the word doctor makes
perceive, and attend. In fact, textbooks on
people recall and respond faster to the word
emotions devote entire chapters just to sum-
nurse. If one thinks about these concepts
marize what we know so far.2
as being nodes in a web, activating the
The ground premise for doing this work is
doctor node will make activation spread
making sure that the participants are emo-
to the nearby nurse node, making it easier
tional before asking them to perform some
for it to be brought to mind. Bower sug-
experimental task. Researchers have spent
gested that an emotional state could func-
their creativity and imagination on devising
tion in a similar way; experiencing an emo-
elicitation methods that reliably put partici-
tion would make it easier to remember and
pants in a desired emotional state, although
attend to things with the same emotional
there has been less work on understanding
meaning. In other words, emotional states
This content downloaded from 78.184.153.237 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:11:20 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
This content downloaded from 78.184.153.237 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:11:20 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
This content downloaded from 78.184.153.237 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:11:20 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
without inducing either positive or negative published for reasons unrelated to the elicita-
valence. This was important for interpreting tion. The data is from 978 participants, and
effects in the subsequent cognitive task. We the number of participants in each condition
wanted to be able to test whether a dimen- ranges from 125 to 304. All experiments used
sional or a discrete emotion model better the combined movie/music elicitation, and
accounted for any emotional effects. the manipulation check was collected at the
end of the experiment. The fear score was
Music The principles behind the selected
only collected for those studies that involved
music were that for happiness the music
a fear manipulation, thus the fear rating for
would be in a major key and fast tempo. We
the happy, sad, and neutral elicitation in-
used Mozarts Eine Kleine Nacht Musik, Di-
volves fewer participants.
vertimento # 136 and Ein Musikalisher Spass,
As can be seen in figure 1, participants
plus Vivaldis Concerto for Two Mandolins
rated themselves as more happy after the
and Strings. For sadness, the music was in
happy elicitation, more sad after the sad
a minor key, and slow: Mahlers Adagietto
elicitation, and more fearful after the fear-
from Symphony No. 5 and Barbers Adagio for
ful elicitation, although the rated sadness is
Strings. The present author suggested second
quite high for these clips also. The happiness
movements from Brahmss First and Third
and sadness ratings for the neutral condition
Symphonies for the neutral condition. The
are quite high, but, most importantly, they
movements are of intermediate pace, and
do differ from the same ratings in the happi-
although they are engaging, do not seem to
ness and sadness conditions in the expected
be of any particular discrete emotion. For
direction.
the fearful induction, we used Pendereckis
Note that the ratings measure the emo-
Threnody to the Victims of Hiroshima and
tional state of the participants at the end of
Polymorphy.42
a thirty-minute experiment, which means
Manipulation Check To check whether that they cannot be attributed to any specific
the elicitation worked, participants com- feature of the experiment (film, music, or the
pleted the Brief Mood Introspection Sur- actual task). It is simply meant to check that
vey (BMIS), which is a checklist consisting the manipulation worked as intended.
of sixteen emotion adjectives (eighteen for
the fear measure).43 Each adjective is rated Databases
on a four-point scale ranging from definitely As demonstrated, the methods worked very
do not feel to definitely do feel. well and served our purposes. Other emotion
The ratings were averaged into three emo- researchers have had similar goals, and there
tion indices: The sadness index used the are now several published papers describing
mean ratings for the adjectives sad, gloomy, validated sets of movie clips for emotion elici-
tired, and drowsy. The happiness index aver- tation. A large proportion of these are listed
aged the ratings for happy, content, peppy, in table 1. The selection and assessment of
lively, and active. Fear used ratings for fear- the movies are very similar across all papers.
ful, jittery, anxious, and nervous.44 Initially, a set of clips are recommended by
friends, or solicited from highly knowledge-
Effectiveness of Manipulation To
able individuals, such as video-store managers
demonstrate the effectiveness of our emo-
and individuals from university film depart-
tion elicitation, I have collected the BMIS
ments. The nominated sequences are whittled
ratings from seven studies from our work on
down to a smaller subset of clips. In prepara-
emotional-response categories that are un-
tion for the ratings, several clips with different
This content downloaded from 78.184.153.237 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:11:20 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Figure 1: Mean emotion ratings for induction clips. Bars indicate average 95% confidence intervals.
intended emotions are edited together into a continuous change in emotion during the clip
longer sequence.. Some care has been taken to (phasic) as well as the residual emotion after
order the clips in ways that minimize spillover the clip (tonic). Second, there are differences
effects of an emotional state from an earlier in emotional response depending on whether
clip. In addition, they are usually put together an individual is familiar with the film or not,
in a couple of different presentation orders for and finally there are idiosyncratic differences
similar reasons. Usually the validation takes in response. The results presented here sug-
place in a group setting. The participants are gest that the residual (tonic) responses are
asked to rate how they feel at the end of each reliable (see the narrow confidence intervals
clip using checklists similar to the BMIS. Un- around the means in figure 1).
like our movies, where we assembled several I disagree with Fernandez-Dolss statement
clips but kept the overall length at twelve that films would not elicit pure, ancestral
minutes, the clips in the validation studies midbrain basic emotions impervious to neo-
are rated discretely and vary considerably in cortical processes in that I first of all dont
length. think any emotions elicited in adults with an
intact neocortex will be devoid of those in-
Conclusion puts, regardless of how they are elicited. Sec-
The emotion communitys use of movies in ond, I would argue that the emotions elicited
their research has mainly been to elicit emo- by films are of the same kind as emotions elic-
tions. Much less research has been spent on ited by other means. Movies would not be the
understanding the mechanisms behind the effective emotion elicitors they are unless they
elicitation, as the Fernandez-Dols quote above were capable of harnessing the emotion cir-
suggests.45 Rottenberg, Ray, and Gross bring cuits that are already in place. Movies ability
up some additional issues with using mov- to enthrall humans is based on their ability to
ies as emotion elicitors.46 First, there is both engage our evolved capacities and concerns.
This content downloaded from 78.184.153.237 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:11:20 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
This content downloaded from 78.184.153.237 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:11:20 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Of course, this is not a passive effect, but an Being: Informative and Directive Functions of
interactive process between the movie and Affective States, Journal of Personality and Social
the perceiver. Neither are the effects in other Psychology 45, no. 3 (1983): 51323.
emotion-eliciting situations. 11. J. P. Forgas and S. Moylan, After the Movies:
Transient Mood and Social Judgments, Personal-
I do agree, however, that the eliciting
ity and Social Psychology Bulletin 13, no. 4 (1987):
power of movies is a research question in
46777.
itself, and something that has been woefully 12. Gerrards-Hesse, Spies, and Hesse, Experi-
underresearched. Emotion researchers know mental Induction of Emotional States, table 1.
a great deal about emotion. Filmmakers have 13. E. Velten, A Laboratory Task for Induction
spent over a century honing their skills in of Mood States, Behaviour Research and Therapy
how to capture an audience. Film researchers 6, no. 4 (1968): 47382.
have spent decades understanding from their 14. Eric Eich and Janet Metcalfe, Mood Depen-
point of view how this is done. Together, we dent Memory for Internal Versus External Events,
can continue further exploration that will Journal of Experimental Psychology 15, no. 3 (1989):
unveil thrilling theoretical tales of movies 44355.
15. This is central to research methodology
and minds.
working on ruling out alternative causes for an
Notes effect. Correlational methods cannot be used to
infer a causal relationship (as reflected in the cor-
1. J. M. Fernandez-Dols, Advances in the Study
relation is not causation mantra). A discussion
of Facial Expression: An Introduction to the Spe-
about strengths and weaknesses of various re-
cial Section, Emotion Review 5, no. 1 (2013): 37.
search methods, as well as handling of confounds
2. K. Oatley, D. Keltner, and J. M. Jenkins, Un-
can be found in any introductory methods book
derstanding Emotions, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Blackwell,
in psychology. Many introductory texts in psy-
2006; M. N. Shiota, and J. W. Kalat, Emotion, 2nd
chology also cover methodology.
ed. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Learning, 2012).
16. M. Isen, K. Daubman, and G. P. Nowicki,
3. J. A. Coan, and J. J. B. Allen, Handbook of
Positive Affect Facilitates Creative Problem Solv-
Emotion Elicitation and Assessment (New York:
ing, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Oxford University Press, 2007).
52, no. 6 (1987): 112231.
4. Tan, E. S., Emotion and the Structure of Nar-
17. Dov Cohen et al., Insult, Aggression, and
rative Film: Film as an Emotion Machine (New
the Southern Culture of Honor: An Experimental
York, Routledge, 1996); Smith, Greg M., Film
Ethnography, Journal of Personality and Social
Structure and the Emotion System (Cambridge:
Psychology 70, no. 5 (1996): 94560.
Cambridge University Press, 2007).
18. Paula M. Niedenthal, Marc B. Setterlund,
5. G. H. Bower, Mood and Memory, American
and Mary B. Wherry, Possible Self-Complexity
Psychologist 36, no. 2 (1981): 12948.
and Affective Reactions to Goal-Relevant Evalua-
6. Allan M. Collins and Elizabeth F. Loftus, A
tion., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Process-
63, no. 1 (July 1992): 516.
ing, Psychological Review 82, no. 6 (1975): 40728.
19. S. Schachter and J. Singer, Cognitive, Social
7. For a summary, see Shiota and Kalat, Emo-
and Physiological Determinants of Emotional
tion, 2630.
State, Psychological Review 69 (1962): 37999.
8. Oatley, Keltner, and Jenkins, Understanding
20. M. Kahn, The Physiology of Catharsis,
Emotions, 30.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3, no.
9. A, Gerrards-Hesse, K, Spies, and F. W. Hesse,
3 (1966): 27886.
Experimental Inductions of Emotional States and
21. F. Strack, L. L. Martin, and S. Stepper, In-
Their Effectiveness: A Review, British Journal of
hibiting and Facilitating Conditions of the Human
Psychology 84 (1994): 5578.
Smile: A Nonobtrusive Test of the Facial Feedback
10. Norbert Schwarz and Gerald L Clore,
Hypothesis, Journal of Personality and Social Psy-
Mood , Misattribution, and Judgments of Well-
chology 54, no. 5 (1988): 76877.
This content downloaded from 78.184.153.237 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:11:20 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
22. Regarding emotion congruence, see Paula 32. Harry & Tonto, directed by Paul Mazursky
M. Niedenthal, Jamin B. Halberstadt, and Marc (Los Angeles, CA: 20th Century Fox, 1974), video-
B. Setterlund, Being Happy and Seeing Happy: cassette.
Emotional State Mediates Visual Word Recogni- 33. Terms of Endearment, directed by James L.
tion, Cognition and Emotion 11, no. 4 (1997): Brooks (Hollywood, CA: Paramount Pictures,
40332. Regarding emotional response categoriza- 1983), videocassette.
tion, see Paula M. Niedenthal, se H. Innes-Ker, 34. Sophies Choice, directed by Alan Pakula
and Jon Margolin, Emotional Response Catego- (Hollywood, CA: Universal Pictures, 1982), video-
rization, Psychological Review 106, no. 2 (1999): cassette.
33761. 35. Cape Fear, directed by Martin Scorsese (Hol-
23. Paula M. Niedenthal and Marc B. Setterlund, lywood, CA: Universal Pictures, 1991), videocas-
Emotion Congruence in Perception, Personal- sette.
ity and Social Psychology Bulletin 20, no. 4 (1994): 36. The Shining, directed by Stanley Kubrick
401411; Niedenthal and Setterlund, Being Happy (Burbank, CA: Warner Bros, 1980), videocassette.
and Seeing Happy; J. B. Halberstadt, P. M. Nie- 37. Fatal Attraction, directed by Adrian Lyne
denthal, and J. Kushner, Resolution of Lexical (Hollywood, CA: Paramount Pictures, 1987), vid-
Ambiguity by Emotional State, Psychological Sci- eocassette.
ence 6, no. 5 (1995): 27882. 38. Silence of the Lambs, directed by Jonathan
24. Niedenthal, Innes-Ker, and Margolin, Emo- Demme (Los Angeles, CA: Orion Pictures, 1991),
tional Response Categorization; J. B. Halberstadt videocassette.
and P. M. Niedenthal, Emotional State and the 39. Bullitt, directed by Peter Yates (Burbank, CA:
Use of Stimulus Dimensions in Judgment., Jour- Warner Bros.-Seven Arts, 1968), videocassette.
nal of Personality and Social Psychology 72, no. 5 40. City Slickers II, directed by Paul Weiland
(1997): 101733. (Culver City, CA: Columbia Pictures, 1994), vid-
25. Niedenthal and Setterlund, Being Happy eocassette.
and Seeing Happy: Emotional State Mediates 41. W. R. Boot et al., The Pervasive Problem
Visual Word Recognition. With Placebos in Psychology: Why Active Control
26. Ibid.; Niedenthal, Innes-Ker, and Margolin, Groups Are Not Sufficient to Rule Out Placebo
Emotional Response Categorization. Effects, Perspectives on Psychological Science 8, no.
27. As a reviewer pointed out, this procedure 4 (2013): 44554.
does not allow us to discern whether the final 42. The specifics of the actual recordings is no
measured emotional state was due to the films or longer available. The eliciting materials were cre-
the music. The aim of the example is simply to ated from the personal collections of the research-
illustrate the effectiveness of one instantiation of ers, and details are not noted in the published
film/music induction. The referenced papers from research.
the Niedenthal Lab as well as the referenced data- 43. John D. Mayer and Yvonne N. Gaschke,
bases of movies include data on the efficiency of The Experience and Meta-Experience of Mood,
both film and music inductions alone. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55, no.
28. Halberstadt and Niedenthal, Emotional 1 (1988): 10211.
State and the Use of Stimulus Dimensions in Judg- 44. Niedenthal and Setterlund, Emotion Con-
ment. gruence in Perception.
29. Benny & Joon, directed by Jeremiah S. Che- 45. Fernandez-Dols, Advances in the Study of
chik (Beverly Hills, CA: Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Facial Expression: An Introduction to the Special
1993), videocassette. Section.
30. Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, di- 46. J. Rottenberg, R. D. Ray, and J. J. Gross,
rected by George Roy Hill (Los Angeles, CA: 20th Emotion Elicitation Using Films, in Handbook of
Century Fox, 1969), videocassette. Emotion Elicitation and Assessment, ed. J. A. Coan
31. Hoosiers, directed by David Anspaugh (Los and J. J. B. Allen (New York: Oxford University
Angeles, CA: Orion Pictures, 1986), videocassette. Press, 2007): 928.
This content downloaded from 78.184.153.237 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:11:20 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
This content downloaded from 78.184.153.237 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:11:20 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Mayer, John D., and Yvonne N. Gaschke. The Schaefer, A., F. Nils, and P. Philippot. Assessing
Experience and Meta-Experience of Mood. the Effectiveness of a Large Databse of Emo-
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55, tion-Eliciting Films: A New Tool for Emotion
no. 1 (1988): 10211. Researchers. Cognition and Emotion 24 (2010):
McHugo, Gregory J., Craig A. Smith, and John T. 1153172.
Lanzetta. The Structure of Self-reports of Emo- Schwarz, Norbert, and Gerald L. Clore. Mood,
tional Responses to Film Segments. Motivation Misattribution, and Judgments of Well-Being:
and Emotion 6, no. 4 (1982): 36585. Informative and Directive Functions of Affec-
Niedenthal, Paula M., Jamin B. Halberstadt, and tive States. Journal of Personality and Social
Marc B. Setterlund. Being Happy and Seeing Psychology 45, no. 3 (1983): 51323.
Happy: Emotional State Mediates Visual Word Shiota, Michelle N., and James W. Kalat. Emotion,
Recognition. Cognition & Emotion 11, no. 4 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Learning,
(August 1997): 40332. 2012.
Niedenthal, Paula M., se H. Innes-Ker, and Jon Silence of the Lambs. Videocasette. Directed by
Margolin. Emotional Response Categorization. Jonathan Demme. Los Angeles, CA: Orion Pic-
Psychological Review 106, no. 2 (1999): 33761. tures, 1991.
Niedenthal, Paula M., and Marc B. Setterlund. Smith, Greg M. Film Structure and the Emotion
Emotion Congruence in Perception. Personal- System. Cambridge: Cambridge University
ity and Social Psychology Bulletin 20, no. 4 (Au- Press, 2007.
gust 01, 1994): 40111. Sophies Choice. Videocasette. Directed by Alan
Niedenthal, Paula M., Marc B. Setterlund, and Pakula. Hollywood, CA: Universal Pictures,
Mary B. Wherry. Possible Self-complexity and 1982.
Affective Reactions to Goal-relevant Evalua- Tan, Ed S. Emotion and the Structure of Narrative
tion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychol- Film: Film as an Emotion Machine. New York:
ogy 63, no. 1 (1992): 516. Routledge, 1996.
Oatley, Keith, Dacher Keltner, and Jennifer M. Terms of Endearment. Videocasette. Directed by
Jenkins. Understanding Emotions, 2nd ed. Ox- James L. Brooks. Hollywood, CA: Paramount
ford: Blackwell, 2006. Pictures, 1983.
Philippot, P. Inducing and Assessing Differenti- The Shining. Videocasette. Directed by Stanley
ated Emotion-Feeling States in the Laboratory. Kubrick. Burbank, CA: Warner Bros., 1980.
Cognition and Emotion 7 (1993): 17193. Strack, F., L. L. Martin, and S. Stepper. Inhibit-
Rottenberg, J., R. D. Ray, and J. J. Gross. Emotion ing and Facilitating Conditions of the Human
Elicitation using Films. In Handbook of Emo- Smile: A Nonobtrusive Test of the Facial Feed-
tion Elicitation and Assessment, edited by J. A. back Hypothesis. Journal of Personality and
Coan and J. J. B. Allen, 928. New York: Oxford Social Psychology 54, no. 5 (1988): 76877.
University Press, 2007. Velten, E. A Laboratory Task for Induction of
Schachter, Stanley, and Jerome Singer. Cognitive, Mood States. Behaviour Research and Therapy
Social and Physiological Determinants of Emo- 6, no. 4 (1968): 47382.
tional State, Psychological Review 69 (1962):
37999.
This content downloaded from 78.184.153.237 on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:11:20 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms