Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
11-12th Grade
Dean Technical High School
Holyoke, MA
October 10-13, 2017
Mr. Jack Weinberger
Springfield College Physical Education Health Education Department
PE Unit Outcomes/State & National Standards/Content/Assessment Template
Psychomotor, Affective, and Cognitive Domains
Grade/Experience Level: 11-12
Fitness Test
/10 Points
1) Name the five components of fitness .5 pts each
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Circle True (T) or False (F) .5 pts each
2) T F The heart is a muscle
3) T F Bowling is a cardiovascular activity
4) T F Yoga increases flexibility
5) T F Higher weight and lower repetitions increase muscle endurance
6) Using the BMI chart, a 20 year old women who is 56 and 184 pounds is
considered: 1pt
A- Underweight
B- Average Weight
C- Overweight
D- Obese
7) Why is a BMI chart not the most accurate way to determine someones body
composition? 1 pt
Match the exercise with target muscle group(some used more than once).5 pts each
8. Push Up _____ A. Legs
9. Sit Up _____ B. Chest
10.Pull Up _____ C. Back
11.Box Jump_____ D. Abs
12.Plank _____
13.Squat _____
14.Bench Press _____
Name:
Cardiovascular/Flexibility Circuit 3 points
WORK HARD and Strengthen your Heart!
How to find max heart rate: 220-age Your max heart rate: _______
How to find target heart rate(HR) : Max HR x 0.7 and Max HR x 0.8
Your target HR range:_____-_____
Cardiovascular
Please list how many of each you got in the time limit and your heart rate after
Burpees: _____________
HR:____________
Flexibility
Please answer the following questions:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Do Now 2: 1 point
Name:
Please explain the difference between muscular strength and muscular endurance:
End of Unit: Self-Assessment
Name:
Please use the following 1-4 scale to assess your effort during this unit.
1=None of the time 2= some of the time 3= most of the time 4= All of the time
1) I was prepared for class, changed, and was ready to be active __________
Missed
Yeisha 3.5 Post
Missed
Nathaniel 3.5 Post
Missed
Joeliann 3.5 Post
Zach M 6 7.5 1.5 Low
Jacob 6.5 7.5 1 Low
Missed
Zach R 6.5 Post
Adalise 6.5 9.5 3 Moderate
Naisha 4.5 9.5 5 High
Oralndo 6.5 10 3.5 Moderate
Missed
Glenda 5 Post
Missed
J'G 6 Post
Missed
Jaylene 4.5 Post
Sergio 6 6 0 Low
Alex 4.5 7 2.5 Moderate
Rafael 0 7.5 7.5 High
Moderate
High 4+ (2-3.9) Low( 0-1.9)
10 13 16
Jack Weinberger
Dean Tech
10/17/17
Results of Assessments
I gave multiple assessments through this unit. The muscular endurance/strength assessment
was a chart that students filled out a cognitive question about each station and an affective
question at each station. The answers to the cognitive questions were on each task card
somewhere in the description of the exercise, diagram, or extensions. The affective was simply
grading each station on its difficulty for them personally. I would say a majority of the students
enjoyed this assessment because it was quick. The other in-activity assessment I gave was during
the cardiovascular unit. The part the students loved was their heart rates. At the beginning of
class everyone calculated their resting, max, and target heart rate zone. Students were incredibly
motivated to get their heart rates in the target zone. I had no way of really checking accuracy of
students written data however. I verbalized my expectation of honest data recordings but had
not way of enforcing it since we had no technology to take heart rates and it is not possible for
me to take every students heart rate after each exercise (if I tried, students waiting would be
I gave a pre-assessment and the same assessment as the posttest. The pre-assessment scores
were alarmingly low. Six students out of 53 students passed. With this being said, the post
assessment 23 students passed. Attendance is and was a problem during the unit and I had many
students miss at least one class. In a four day, information heavy unit, it was hard to make up the
missed information to these students. Even with the low-test scores, the improvement from
pre-test to post-test was great. The increase cognitive knowledge students during question and
answers, activity assessments, and Do Nows improved. I was able to get into some concept
conversations with certain classes which was awesome. With my 6th period class, everyone
passed the post-test and by the end of the week we were talking about the different types of
energy systems used in the body during exercise and about proper muscle recover techniques.
The students ranged in content info before the unit from none at all to knowing some of the
muscles. I decided not to give the anatomy quiz as a formal quiz and instead it was given to some
classes as a Do Now. Coach D and I decided that in a sort four-day unit, it was overly optimistic
to expect memorization of the nine muscles. However, the classes that had more content
knowledge (seniors and one junior class), were given the study guide and the quiz as a Do Now.
One reason for lower scores is I gave the pre-test only in English. As I observed such low scores,
I realized students either did not try at all or they did not understand. I translated the test into
Spanish for the post-test and gave students the option to take a Spanish copy, English copy, or
both for the post-test. At least one student from every class took the Spanish version.
I would modify the pre and post-assessment in the future by changing some of the questions.
I would eliminate the BMI question and the final question about the benefit of training muscular
endurance. The BMI questions was a little too complicated especially since the students only got
to do one activity with the BMI chart. The last question about muscular endurance was simply
too open-ended. Students would write things like, to get better that muscular endurance.
Technically this is correct. Training muscular endurance allows you to get better at it. But this
jumps in all the domains for content knowledge. I was impressed with how hard the students
Strongly
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Total
1. My teacher demonstrates that mistakes are a part of learning. 22 20 1 2
2. My teacher encourages students to challenge each others thinking
in this class 22 22 0 1
3. The level of my work in this class goes beyond what I thought I was
able to do. 12 28 4 1
4. If I finish my work early in class, my teacher has me do more
challenging work. 8 26 9 2
5. In this class, students work together to help each other learn
difficult content. 17 23 4 1
6. My teacher helps us identify our strengths and shows us how to use
them to help us learn 23 21 0 1
7. In this class, students are asked to teach or model to other
classmates a part of whole lesson 16 23 5 1
8. Our class stays on task and does not waste time 10 22 4 9
9. My teacher believes that hard work, not ability, will ensure my
success. 20 20 2 0
10. In this class, I can decide how to show my knowledge (e.g., write a
paper, prepare a presentation, make a video). 11 21 9 1
Dean Tech: Student Feedback Survey Results/Analysis
10/18/17
Analysis of Results:
Question 8: 71.1% of students either strongly agreed or agreed with the statement
- This was the lowest result of the survey. This question was about the class staying on
task and not wasting time. Some classes have taken massive strides in decreasing
off-task behavior and as a teacher, I have increased my classroom management skills.
This is a work in progress for both the students and myself as an educator.
Question 9: 95.2% of students either strongly agreed or agreed with the statement
- Almost all students feel that I believe that hard work ensures success. On a daily
basis, I reiterate to the students the significance and weight of participating to their
fullest ability. Other than some psychomotor assessments, there are no grades
recorded on outcome performances. The students that scores 35 points in a basketball
grade receives the same grade as the students that scored 0 but was a great teammate
and participated the best they could.
Question 10: 76.2 % of students either strongly agreed or agreed with the statement
- I wish this percentage was higher of students who either strongly agreed or agreed
with the statement regarding student choice when it comes to showing knowledge. As
I continue getting better, I hope to use creativity to provide students will many
different authentic assessments to allow all student learners to have a chance to use
their favorite skill set.
A few examples from optional additional feedback section:
- You are a great coach and teacher. I feel you should be a part of Dean Tech!
- Hes a good PE teacher. We get to try out many different games instead of just
playing the same game.
- He is good at teaching and very respectful. 10/10. I hope to see him next year.
- Best PE teacher I have ever had.
- Mr. Weinberger is a great teacher that explains task and helps us use these skills for
our everyday life. We like to have him again.
- He is a great teacher and he explains things right and he shows us visuals when
doing a new activity.
- This is the best teacher. He is phenomenal and involves all kids and has fun with all
of them.
- He pretty narly
Works Cited
Benson, Roy, and Declan Connolly. Heart Rate Training. Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics,
2011.
National standards & guidelines for physical education teacher education. National Association
for Sport and Physical Education, 2009.
Pate, Russell R, and Richard C Hohn. Health and Fitness through Physical Education.
Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics, 1994.
Peloquin, Andrew. The 5 Components of Physical Fitness / Fitness / Body Building. / Fitness /
Body Building,
www.fitday.com/fitness-articles/fitness/body-building/the-5-components-of-physical-fitn
ess.html.