Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Tyler Aken
Professor Dada
ENG 111-29
Since the 1970s, there has been a strong movement by many American cities to enact a
type of legislation aimed at reducing youth-based crimes. This type of legislation is a curfew,
restricting those within certain age ranges from being in public during certain hours of the day.
This legislation was enacted in response to the growing juvenile crime during the 1970s
(Henry). This movement gained popularity during the 90s, with 73% of cities with populations
over 100,000 implementing teen curfew laws (Ruefle and Reynolds). Although while curfews
may have been enacted as a way to deter juvenile crime, the enforceability, effectiveness and
impact of the law onto certain communities has been brought into question. While this law may
have good intentions, it seems to be clear that it is not a fair and effective solution for the
Curfews have been touted as a way to reduce overall youth crime, by preventing them
from committing said crime during curfew hours, although there has been some question as to
whether these curfews are actually effective in reducing crime. In a 3-year study, conducted by
Richard Sutphen and Janet Ford on the effect of a curfew on arrest rates, they find that the
curfew was not associated with significant changes in the juvenile arrest rates for any kind of
crime including serious (violent) crimes (Sutphen and Ford). In another study, we take a look at
Prince William County, while they implemented a curfew for many the same reasons that other
Aken 2
cities in the United States did, to reduce youth crime, their police chief at the time, Charline
Deane, said this, "we are not surprised that the curfew has not reduced {juvenile crime}, since a
significant percentage of crimes occur before curfew hours," in an interview regarding the recent
curfew (Grech). These studies seem to reach the same conclusion, prohibiting teenagers from
being in public during these hours has had no effect on crime. The police departments of these
cities that enforce the curfew all hold an opposing viewpoint, that the effects of the curfew are
for the well-being and reassurance of citizens, rather than actually reducing crime. There seems
to be a disconnect between legislators that enforce these policies and the reality of the situation
The previous examples showed that the youth curfews did not reduce crime, although, in
a study conducted by Jennifer Doleac, an assistant professor at the University of Virginia, and
Jillian Carr an assistant professor at Purdue University, they find that the youth curfew in
Washington D.C actually serves "to increase the number of gunfire incidents by 150% during
marginal hours (Carr and Doleac). Jennifer Doleac and Jillian Carr were able to come to that
conclusion by examining the time change in the curfew from the summer, where kids are out of
school and the curfew is set to 12am, to the fall, when the children return to school and the
curfew is set to 11pm, they also examine the compare the effect on weekdays at 11pm to the
11pm weekend hour and the 12am weekday hour in order to account for seasonal changes in gun
violence. They note that when the curfew becomes in enforceable at 11pm, instead of midnight,
gunfire should decrease between 11pm and 12am. However, they find that the opposite of that
actually occurs. Using data provided by ShotSpotter, a gunshot detection service that uses
acoustic gunshot sensors which cover many violent neighborhoods in D.C, they find that the
amount of gunfire that occurs during that hour when the curfew is enforced increases by 150% in
comparison to when the curfew is not in effect at that hour. Doleac and Carr propose a theory
Aken 3
that, by incentivizing people (both juveniles and their caregiversparents, older siblings) to go
home earlier, they clear the streets of bystanders and witnesses whose mere presence could deter
crime. It seems to be apparent that this claim is correct, that the curfew actually increases the
amount of crime that occurs due to the fact that less witnesses may be in the area. This study
shows that on top of the fact that youth curfews do not reduce the amount of crime that occurs, it
can actually serve as a catalyst for more violent crime to occur. There should be no basis to keep
a law in tact that will serve to only increase various types of violent crime that can affect the
A noticeable problem when it comes to a youth curfew can be its ability to actually be
enforced. Most curfews are applied to any person who may be under eighteen years old, although
there are many teens out there who can easily appear older or younger than that of their
counterparts. Police departments have taken an interesting take on combating this problem, many
have implemented, Curfew Task Forces, that perform curfew sweeps. These curfew sweeps
involve officers that are specifically dedicated to combat the curfew, by asking individuals who
look like they may be breaking the curfew. Although these sweeps may catch violators, a former
LAPD Police Chief, Bernard Parks, points out that these sweeps costed a total of 3600 office
hours in a six-month period (Lait). Another notable fact taken from the police chief is that only
17% of curfew citations were from task forces, with the remaining percentage from officers on
their regular duty shifts (Lait). Overall, while these laws may be enforced, the methods by which
they are enforced seem to take up valuable time from officers that could easily be spent
While police officers may try their best to find those who are in violation of these
curfews, there has become a trend that develops with curfew violations. This trend being that
Aken 4
those who are found in violation of the curfew are being found to be disproportionally targeted in
terms of their racial or gender groups. In New Orleans, while African Americans only make up
60% of the population there 93% of youths that were found in violation of the curfew were
African American, in contrast, while Caucasians make up 33% of the population in New
Orleans, only 6% of people found in violation of the curfew were Caucasian (Vargas). In Austin,
a similar trend is found, although at a smaller scale, according to a report from the city of Austin,
Black youth account for 17% of all [Austin Police Department] APD tickets and 18% of
[Austin Independent School District] AISD tickets, but represent 8% of the population aged 10-
17 (City of Austin). Lastly, in the city of San Diego, the same trend is found yet again as noted
in the San Diego Tribune, Hispanics represent 33 percent of the San Diego County population
and 49 percent of the countys 2014 curfew arrests. Blacks represent five percent of the San
Diego County population, and more than 16 percent of curfew arrests in 2014 were of black
youth (Morrisey). It seems to be clear that these laws, while not their intent, seem to unjustly
While youth curfews may not necessarily have a direct effect on crime, these statues
serve to provide an emotional effect on various members of the community. Curfews tend to
have the effect of providing people a sense of well-being believing that children may be safe
since its against the law for them to be outside. Many parents also support the idea of a youth
curfew, they subscribe to the belief that while the curfew may not help reduce crime its nice for
them to know that there wont be children on the streets. Overall the emotional effect of this law
is one of the main reasons that this law has not been abolished. However, our laws should not be
tailored to appeal the emotions of the members of our communities, rather they should be made
In conclusion, youth curfews seemed to have lost their general purpose, reducing youth
crime, and in the have been proven to actually create crime in some cases. Youth curfews have
proved to be difficult for many police departments to enforce, taking resources away from their
department and requiring man hours just to police these curfews. These curfews have also
disproportionately targeted certain racial groups, like the city of Austin had found, and they have
since repealed these curfews. Collectively we need to take a look at these curfews again, much
like the city of Austin has, to determine whether these curfews are helping our youth or hurting
them.
Aken 6
Works Cited
Carr, Jillian B. and Jennifer L. Doleac. "Keep the Kids Inside? Juvenile Curfews and Urban Gun
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2486903
<http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=283678>.
Grech, Daniel A. "The Washington Post." Curfew Popular but Not a Crime Fighter, Study Finds
Henry, Tamara. " Curfews Attempt to Curb Teen Crime." USA Today 5 April 1995. Magazine.
Lait, Matt. "Los Angeles Times." Study Finds Curfew Law Fails to Curb Violent Crime 2
Morrisey, Kate. "The San Diego Union-Tribune." Are San Diego's curfew sweeps obsolete? 8
2016jul08-htmlstory.html>.
Ruefle, W. and K. M. Reynolds. "Curfews and delinquency in major American cities." Crime
Sutphen, Richard D. and Janet Ford. "The Effectiveness and Enforcement." Journal of Sociology
Vargas, Ramon A. "The Times-Picayune." New Orleans' curfew enforcement is racially biased,
ineffective, critics say; but NOPD Chief disagrees 20 March 2013. Web.
<http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2013/03/new_orleans_curfew_enforcement.html