Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
English 5M
Prof. Doutherd
11/14/17
Rhetorical Analysis On Nursing Writing
Part 3 (Discussion)
The research paper that was written by the group of students is indeed considered a good
paper in the eyes of an instructor who specializes in Nursing because, although it dosent speak
on medical advice or medical research, it does a good job of expressing the contents of a research
paper. It has the same purpose, to defend a point and show proven evidence, and possibly come
up with some solutions. That's exactly what nurses do, their job requires to do research to better
the life of their patients. The CSU Handbook states, Nursing Research has a significant
emphasis in nursing practice because much of the research arises out of clinical observations
ultimately design to improve of patient care. A research paper, no matter what the topic is
about, has the same intended purpose and thats why the research paper the students wrote does a
good job of demonstrating what writing in the nursing career looks like.
Another way the research paper would fit the criteria is that it was written in the same
format as nursing research paper would be written as. Nurses use the APA Format on their
paper to consistent and clear about what they write about. The CSU Handbook mentions that the
APA Format is commonly used because it it provides clear evidence to the reader that you have
researched your topic, and also supports and justifies statements made in your work by citing
published experts. That is the same way that the research paper was formatted in order reveal
problems in the schools and discuss the possible outcomes.
Jasueth Landaverde
English 5M
11/14/17
Draft 3 Rhetorical Analysis Cover Letter
Dear Professor Doutherd,
One of the many things I realized as I was reading over my drafts is that the writing
processes of the assignments weve done in class have changed my view as how I reflect on my
writing and engaged in the metacognitive process. I certainly have benefitted from this because it
has allowed me to receive and give feedback on writing, it benefits my peers and of course
myself in a way where we become better writers. Within the Rhetorical Analysis I have learned
that I have a hard time appropriately organizing and transitioning my ideas where the reader
completely understands. Doing multiple drafts has helped me shape my writing in a more logical
and ordering way. One of the many things I found difficult about this assignment was that it
required multiple parts written differently, on my first draft I wrote everything in a personal way,
and later on, on the other drafts had to change certain sections into detached impersonal style.
On another note, something that went well is that I was able to freely speak on what nurses job is
like, and that was really exciting for me and also benefitted me when I had to correlate quotes
onto part 2. Something that I would change if I got to do this assignment all over again would be
to know how to write in impersonal detached style before writing the whole assignment. I had a
hard time rewriting everything without changing any of the information I already had. I feel as
this draft is almost completely ready but there are still some glitches. In order for this assignment
to be uploaded I feel the need the go over it one more time after youve given it one more glance.
I did some changes you suggested on draft 2. Besides that, I feel that my work is ready.
I broke down the sections into small paragraphs to get a better understanding and be more
linear.
Also took out information and evidence that didnt correlate with part 3, and added a
paraphrase from CSU Handbook.
Was my introduction more clear this time than in draft 2?