Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Professor Suk
Foundations of Education EDUC 212-01
Currents Events Summary and Reaction
Joe Heims article in The Washington Post entitled "Education Secretary says civics
education should encourage activism highlights the speech given by John B. King Jr. to the
National Press Club in Washington D.C. on October 19th, 2016 regarding the present and future
state of civics education in Americas classrooms, colleges, and communities. The transcript and
video of the speech was released separately on the website of the US Department of Education.
The goal of the speech was to advocate for an educational philosophy that treats civics as a
cornerstone in creating a well-rounded student equipped to handle the responsibilities and duties
of democracy. At the crux of Mr. Kings speech was (1) an emphasis on civic activism among
every subject area of a curriculum, including math and science (King, 2016). Mr. King, the US
Secretary of Education, made sure to contextualize his remarks by offering a historical perspective
on the progress made in America in terms of voting rights, political opportunities, free speech, and
educational access. However, he tempered these remarks by noting that civics knowledge in
America is a dismal and that reform efforts such as requiring students to pass a citizenship exam
In relation to Chapter 3 of Kochs TEACH, which outlined the history of education and
teaching in the United States, I found Secretary Kings words on the importance of civics education
for democracy to be especially compelling. When he contends that the strength of our democracy
depends on all of us, as Americans, understanding our history and the Constitution and how the
government works, at every level he harkens back to the words of Jefferson and Franklin (King,
2016). Both of those founding fathers recognized that a new democracy required an educated
2|Page Dhagat, Sandeep (Fall 2016)
citizenry for its survival, and championed the ideas that gave rise to common schools and
meritocracy (Koch, 2011). Educating students about their role in democracy was one of the
original goals of public education in this country. Secretary King does well to argue that it should
remain so given the increasing diversity of our countrys ethnic, racial, and religious, composition.
As a student and citizen deeply concerned about the state of our society and government, I
sympathize with Secretary Kings conclusion that civics has lost its special pedestal in American
education. In light of recent poor NAEP results in civics and US history, he made a strong
argument that rote memorization of historical facts and a passive appreciation of American
government is insufficient to raise students to the levels of civic participation needed to face the
Secretary King prefers a more activist form of civics education, which he describes and
defends in his speech. He calls on immersing students in primary source documents, encouraging
local community initiatives, practicing community service and volunteerism, and having students
go beyond simply voting to campaigning and contacting their representatives and sitting in on
township and BOE meetings (Heim, 2016). Based on personal anecdotal evidence however, the
challenges facing civics education in the 21st century extend way beyond the classroom. There is
a palpable sense of apathy and cynicism, especially among young voters and students. There is
general confusion on how to apply the principles of government and history learned in essentialist
classrooms to our daily lives, especially if our careers are not focused on public policy or politics.
There is an overemphasis (from society) about working for yourself to prepare for a competitive
job market rather than working for your country. There is unease among educators and
administrators and BOE officials about injecting politics into supposedly secular and nonpartisan
classrooms. There is the overarching problem of how the school districts and classrooms are
3|Page Dhagat, Sandeep (Fall 2016)
designed as well. Students are largely segregated by intellectual ability, race/ethnicity, and
socioeconomic status. These factors are deeply influential in how political affiliations develop,
and thus can perpetuate echo chambers as students live through their most formative moments of
political development. These are questions and problems that Secretary King does not necessarily
address in his speech, and it remains to be seen whether real reform can be affected beyond mere
rhetoric.
4|Page Dhagat, Sandeep (Fall 2016)
Based on this article and speech and video, the questions I challenge my classmates and
1) How should we define an active citizen for the 21st century? Do we need a new model
2) Describe your personal experiences with education. Did it adequately prepare you for
life as a citizen? What was missing or lacking? What was effective and rewarding?
3) If we focus only on the future of civics education (today and tomorrows youth), are
we ignoring all the millions of adult Americans who are civically illiterate?
4) How can we expect students to be civically active if they have little civic knowledge,
and how can we expect students to use civic knowledge if they arent civically active?
5|Page Dhagat, Sandeep (Fall 2016)
References:
Focus group reflects nation's dark mood ahead of Election Day. (2016, November 6). Retrieved
November 07, 2016, from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-american-voters-
on-trump-clinton/
Heim, J. (2016, October 19). Education Secretary says civics education should encourage
activism. The Washington Post. Retrieved November 1, 2016, from
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/education-secretary-says-civics-
education-should-encourage-activism/2016/10/19/ec66a5b4-9610-11e6-bb29-
bf2701dbe0a3_story.html
King, J. B., Jr. (2016, October 19). Hand-In-Hand: Well-Rounded Education and Civic
Engagement. Speech presented at National Press Club, Washington DC. Retrieved
November 6, 2016, from https://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/hand-hand-well-rounded-
education-and-civic-engagement