Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introductory Examples
NetSim
2
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
3 Earth Fault Near the Circuit Breaker in a Single Feeder Configuration . . . .15
3.1 Entering the Fault Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
3.2 Entering the CB Parameters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
3.3 Entering Time Assessment Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
3.4 Running the Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
3.5 Results and Time Signals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19
3
OMICRON Test Universe
7 Considering CT Simulation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
4
Introductory Examples
1 Introductory Examples
Introduction
NetSim Introductory Examples is a collection of test case examples, which are
intended to give the user a quick start into OMICRONs Network Simulation test
module. This collection of examples is neither a complete functional reference,
nor a detailed user manual. The application of NetSim is explained by
performing and mastering the NetSim examples. The most important features of
the module will be covered; the individual settings that depend on the users
network will be omitted.
Reference information about the test modules is found in the module-specific
Help. You are encouraged to use this reference first whenever you have a
question or need further explanation about a specific topic.
Although NetSim is easy to use even for users who have never worked with
network simulation before, it is an advanced test module and it is targeted for
advanced users. This manual assumes that the user has previous experience
with other OMICRON test modules, for example State Sequencer, and has the
understanding of OMICRON Test Universe concept. The common basic tasks
for all test modules, like setting nominal values in a Test Object, routing of input
and output signals in the Hardware Configuration or changing the Report
Settings are not explained in this manual.
About NetSim
The Network Simulation (NetSim) simulates events in an electric power supply
network. NetSim can generate the corresponding secondary voltages and the
secondary currents from distinct locations in the network via a connected CMC
test set. These voltage and currents represent close to realistic conditions to a
connected relay. This relays response to this stimulus can then be measured
and evaluated.
NetSim uses a numerical model to calculate the quantities and to simulate a
power system. The power system is composed of voltage sources, lines, and
circuit breakers. The fault instances and the switching events determine the
changes and the actions in the network.
NetSim provides predefined Test Cases and Network Configurations. The
test cases define the type of event to be simulated and the network
configurations determine the topology to be used for the simulation. Further test
cases and network configurations can be added to NetSim later on.
5
NetSim
Test View
The Test View contains the complete specifications for the simulation that is
performed. The parameters are grouped into several tabs. A graphical
representation of the actual network configuration with some important labels is
displayed to provide a reference for the parameters in the tabs. All parameters
are preset with a default value. You can immediately run a simulation with these
defaults.
Figure 1-1:
Test View with
graphical
representation of
network configuration
With regard to the network parameter tabs described below, please bear in mind
that if secondary values are being displayed, the ratio of the according selected
reference location B needs to be considered!
6
Introductory Examples
7
NetSim
After a test, this view also shows the status of the recorded binary inputs during
playback, along with the generated voltages and the generated currents. The
detailed evaluation of the instantaneous values and of the time relationships are
provided by using the cursors.
Time Assessment
At Time Assessment set up measurement conditions and displays the actual
values and the automatic assessment of the results after a test.
The usage of the NetSim Time Assessment is identical to the one in the State
Sequencer and Advanced Transplay test modules.
Impedance View
Contrary to the Time Signal View that displays the voltages, currents and the
resulting fault impedance along a time axis, the Impedance View displays the
fault impedance in the complex plane, taking into consideration the zone
characteristic settings made at the Distance Test Object (Mho, Lens/Tomato
or polygonal).
The number of diagrams displayed in the Impedance View depends on the
selected test case and the resulting number of measurement locations. The
Impedance View always displays the impedance curves of all measurement
locations of a particular test case.
At Display Impedances set whether you want to display for each measurement
location:
one individual impedance per diagram (for example, ZAL1, ZAL2,
ZAL3 ...), or
the impedances of a triple (3 lines) per diagram (for example, ZAL1-E +
ZAL2-E + ZAL3-E ...); A being the designation of the measurement
location.
In addition, set whether it is a line to ground (L-E) or a line to line (L-L) fault. For
line to ground faults, the k-factor set in the Distance Test Object is taken into
consideration.
Select the Show measurement points options to display the measurement
points along the impedance curve (measurements in fixed 0.2 ms time
intervals).
Report View
The Report View displays a preview of the report with the settings for the
simulations and results of the test. The NetSim Report View is identical to the
Report View in the other OMICRON test modules.
8
Earth Fault in Phase A
Solution
The test case used for the example is shown in the following figure:
Figure 2-1:
Test case for short- Line 1 Line 2 Line 3
circuit event simulation
Source 1 Source 2
80 %
9
NetSim
The default settings for the line impedance and source impedance are used in
this example. They are:
Z1,Line: 3 85
Z0,Line: 12 85
Z1,Source: 15 85
Z0,Source: 54 85
Fault location: 0.8 p.u. of line 2
Line 1, Line 2: 0.5 p.u. of line 2
Z2 = Z1
U1 = 100 V 0
For source 2, U2 = 100 V36 is chosen. During the faultless period, this
causes a current of:
Figure 2-2:
Calculation of the
current during the
VSource1 3 VSource 2 3 35.7V72
I Prefault = = = 0.99 A 13
faultless period
2 Z1, Line + 2 Z1, Source 3685
10
Earth Fault in Phase A
11
NetSim
12
Earth Fault in Phase A
The "plausibility check" of the voltages and the currents in figure 2-5 results in a
positive assessment. The voltage in phase A breaks down into smaller values
during the fault. Since the fault is closer to phase B, the voltage is smaller in
phase B than in phase A. The voltages in the healthy phase of B and C rise due
to the displacement of the neutral point.
The current in phase A rises but the currents in the healthy phases B and C do
not change during the fault. The peak value is about three times the prefault
value immediately after fault inception. After approximately 130 ms, the DC
component decays and the steady state short-circuit current is roughly twice the
prefault current.
13
NetSim
14
Earth Fault Near the Circuit Breaker in a Single Feeder Configuration
Solution
The same fault event (short-circuit) and the same test case (single line) used in
Example 1 are also used for this test. Again, this is the default test case when
starting NetSim.
Figure 3-1:
Test case for short-
circuit simulation with
Line 1 Line 2
disconnected source 2
Source 1
10 %
For this example, the default settings can be used except for:
Since the example contains a spur line with no load, no current will flow through
the faultless periods. The steady state fault current can be calculated from the
formula for a single-phase fault.
Figure 3-2:
Calculations of the VSource 1 3 3 VSource 1 173.2V0
steady state fault I Fault = 3 = = = 1.83 A 85
Z 0 + Z1 + Z 2 0.6 Z 0, Line + Z 0,Source + 1.2 Z 1,Line + 2 Z 1,Source 94.885
current for a
single-phase fault
Note: These equations can be used to verify the simulation.
15
NetSim
16
Earth Fault Near the Circuit Breaker in a Single Feeder Configuration
17
NetSim
18
Earth Fault Near the Circuit Breaker in a Single Feeder Configuration
19
NetSim
20
Fault with Autoreclosure and Persisting Fault
Solution
A reasonable simulation of such a course of events is possible even though
NetSim is not a real-time simulation tool, and therefore cannot take into account
the reactions of the relay being tested for the actual signal calculations.
Two circumstances can be used to support the solution:
1. For the relay being tested, reasonable signals with causal timing have to
be provided. Since the circuit breaker has some action time, the relay
does not require the fault condition to disappear immediately after the trip
so it is appropriate to set up the test sequence in such a way that the fault
is cleared in a practical time.
2. Similar considerations apply for the reclosure time and the clearing of the
persisting fault. Since the pause time runs from the moment the clearing
of the fault is detected until the reclosure signal is issued by the relay, the
drop-off time, the pause time and the CB-close time have to be included
into the calculations. The timing for the persisting fault corresponds to the
explanation above.
The CB tab in the NetSim Test View provides the necessary settings to
configure the appropriate sequences for this example.
All other settings for the source and fault parameters are identical to Earth Fault
in Phase A on page 9. Please refer to Entering the Source Parameters on
page 11 and Entering the Fault Parameters on page 12 for further information.
21
NetSim
22
Fault with Autoreclosure and Persisting Fault
At the start of the simulation, the initial states of the CBs are defined at Initial
State on the CB tab. The Initial State feature has been previously used in
Entering the CB Parameters on page 17 for simulating the spur line by
disconnecting busbar B.
The settings for changing the state of the CBs can be made at Circuit Breaker
A and Circuit Breaker B. Per CB you can define up to four state changes. The
timing of the state changes refers to the fault event. Settings for three-pole and
single-pole openings and for three-pole closing of the CB are provided.
Changes in the CB states are defined from top to bottom so any unused fields
remain in the (unchanged) default setting.
Note: For other test cases with more CBs, for example, double line, additional
CB tabs will be available in the Test View.
23
NetSim
24
Fault with Autoreclosure and Persisting Fault
25
NetSim
The described test shows that NetSim provides flexible settings that allow a
simple simulation of realistic events.
26
Multiple Faults on Parallel Lines
Solution
The simulation is performed with a network configuration as shown in the
following figure:
Figure 5-1:
Network configuration Line 2
for short circuit event
simulation on double
line 40 %
Source 1 Source 2
Line 1
20 %
Again, many of the settings are left as the default values, and they are not
repeated throughout the manual. Only the essential settings are mentioned.
27
NetSim
Z1,Line 2 + 2 Z1,Source
Half of the current through this total impedance flows through each of the two
parallel lines.
28
Multiple Faults on Parallel Lines
Choosing VSource2 = 100 V <- 66 for Source 2 results in a prefault current of:
This test is performed with the default values. For further details about the
definition of the mutual coupling impedance ZM of these settings refer to
Appendix 4.7.
29
NetSim
30
Multiple Faults on Parallel Lines
31
NetSim
Figure 5-6:
Timings for CBs on line
2 (C, D)
32
Multiple Faults on Parallel Lines
Figure 5-8 on page 33 shows the time interval when the two faults overlap and
CBs A and B open up.
From Fault 2 on, all voltages break down to small values due to the three-phase
fault on line 2. At 100 ms, CB A opens. Phase C is first disconnected and since
it is free of fault in line 1, some voltage returns because of the infeed through CB
B, which has not opened yet. Also due to the infeed from the other side and due
to the DC component, which has not decayed yet, the arc in pole A of CB A
cannot extinguish and I A-A flows for another period, almost until CB B opens at
120 ms.
Figure 5-8:
Switching off currents at
CB A during fault
overlap and delayed CB
opening
33
NetSim
Figure 5-9:
Induced voltage through
mutual coupling when
zero sequence current
is present
Figure 5-9 shows the induced voltages seen by relay A when CBs C and D open
and the currents on line 2 return to zero. At the zero crossings of the individual
phases, the zero sequence current in line 2 appears or changes its value, which
becomes effective as induced voltage on line 1 through the mutual coupling.
These details illustrate how accurately NetSim simulates the different events
and the quantities during complex fault sequences in the system. The effects
displayed, depending on the multiple parameters, cannot be evaluated by
analytical means and demonstrate the advantages of a simulation.
34
Multiple Faults on Parallel Lines
35
NetSim
36
Testing Power Swing Detection
Solution
The simulation can be performed with NetSim, using the test case Power Swing.
To assess the range of slip frequencies where the detection works and where it
fails, multiple measurements at different slip frequencies have to be performed.
Again, many, if not most settings will be left as the default values. Those will not
be repeated, only the essential settings will be mentioned.
37
NetSim
The power swing test case is further described by the attribute "Asynchronous",
which means that generator 2 (source 2) is assumed to be out of step while
generator 1 (source 1) remains stable at the nominal frequency. A positive value
for the slip frequency means that the frequency of source two is reduced by this
amount against the nominal frequency. At practical ratios between the voltages
of the two sources, the impedance locus travels straight through the entire
tripping area, leaving it at the opposite side to where it entered.
Figure 6-2:
Typical impedance
locus during an
asynchronous power
swing
38
Testing Power Swing Detection
Beside the durations for prefault and postfault, only the slip frequency must be
specified. The "fault time" is implicitly defined by this, since the "fault" event is
exactly one period of the slip frequency. Since the length of the calculated
transient file is limited and increases with lower slip frequencies, the minimum
value for this is around 0.2 Hz. With these settings, a single test could be run
now, but we will go for a more sophisticated procedure.
Most power swing detection algorithms somehow determine the rate of change
of the measured impedance (this is the calculated ratio voltage/current at the
relay location). If the change is comparable slow against the change during a
typical fault event, the presence of a power swing is assumed. When the slip
frequency is raised, the rate of change of the measured impedance also
increases. So the power swing detection function can be expected to fail at
certain values of the slip frequency.
To determine the range where the power swing detection works and to find the
limit where it begins to fail, multiple tests with different slip frequencies have to
be performed. To facilitate this, NetSim offers the Sequence feature for the
automatic variation of parameters for repeated tests.
39
NetSim
40
Testing Power Swing Detection
The exact timing of the power swing detection is hard to predict and can be
expected to vary with the slip frequency. So a very general condition is specified,
which requires the input to become active somewhere within one second after
the "fault" event. With this, a raw yes/no assessment can be performed.
Testing this with just a trip contact would require more conditions to be fulfilled.
So the power swing blocking function would have to be activated to influence the
behavior of the trip contact. Since measuring and assessment of "something not
happening" is generally more difficult, the interpretation of the measurement
condition would have to be inverted. In this case, tripping would be expected at
slip frequencies above about 2.5 Hz.
41
NetSim
The following figure shows the Time Signal View for the test point with a slip
frequency of 2.2 Hz.
Figure 6-6:
Time Signal View for a
power swing with a slip
frequency of 2.2 Hz
When the whole sequence is executed, the test points for frequencies above
2.4 Hz are assessed as "failed". Since we expected the power swing detection
not to work at these slip frequencies, the result is correct and as expected for our
test case.
Figure 6-7:
Assessment of test
sequence with a varying
slip frequency
42
Considering CT Simulation
7 Considering CT Simulation
To enable the current transformer (CT) simulation for the current triple of your
choice, select the CT option in the Model column on the Outputs tab.
CT simulation is available for any test case. This example explains it with the
test case "Short Curcuit - Single Line".
If enabled, the current transformer is modeled in its characteristics and the
"modified" transformer is considered when performing the test.
This allows tests including the CT saturation effects resulting from the CT and
burden data and the primary current. These saturation effects are also displayed
in both the Time Signal View for currents and impedances and in the
Impedance View.
Figure 7-1:
Outputs tab, enabling
CT simulation
43
NetSim
Figure 7-2:
The Current
Transformer (CT)
dialog
Set the characteristic CT data for the defined CT location either by selecting an
existing Template, by importing the data from a CT Analyzer file, or by entering
the CT Data parameters manually.
The meaning of the various CT settings is explained in the "Correlation between
CT Property Table and CT Analyzer Result Value" topic of the Help
accompanying the NetSim test module.
Figure 7-3:
Navigating to the Help
topic "Correlation
between CT Property
Table and CT Analyzer
Result Value"
44
Power Transformer Test Case
IA IB IC ID
Transformer
Line 1 Line 2
1 Loc. Loc. 2
HV LV
side side
When entering the power system data, apart from the ratio of the primary and
secondary values of the selected measurement location, also the absolute
primary values that apply to the measurement location (voltage level of the
according side of the transformer) are relevant.
45
NetSim
Figure 8-2:
On the Transformer tab
enter the
transformer-specific
data
In cases when the transformers star point is either isolated or highly resistive
(reactive), enter a high resistance (we suggest 1 M).
46
Power Transformer Test Case
To simulate an external ("through") fault, place the fault on the line (Faulted
segment = Line 1 or Line 2).
To simulate a fault inside the protected zone (between locations B and C),
select HV side (bushing) or LV side (bushing).
Furthermore, impacts of different CT saturations can be investigated.
The meaning of the various CT settings is explained in the "Correlation
between CT Property Table and CT Analyzer Result Value" topic of the Help
accompanying the NetSim test module.
Figure 8-3:
Navigating to the Help
topic "Correlation
between CT Property
Table and CT Analyzer
Result Value"
47
NetSim
48
Support
Support
When you are working with our products we want to provide you with the
greatest possible benefits. If you need any support, we are here to assist you!
OMICRON electronics GmbH, Oberes Ried 1, 6833 Klaus, Austria, +43 59495
155
Support
156
Index
Index L
load simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
B
backup overcurrent protection without tripping
differential main function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
M
Measurement
Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
C
CT Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Current Transformer (CT) dialog . . . . . . . . . . 44
N
NetSim
Running the Test . . . . . . . . . . 12, 18, 26, 32
Network
D Configurations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Selecting Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
default values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
differential protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
with unbalanced CT saturation . . . . . . . . 47
P
E Parameters
Circuit Breaker Parameters
Earth Fault Entering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
In Phase A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Near Circuit Breaker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Measurement Conditions . . . . . . . . . . 26
Examples Timing for Initial Fault . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Earth Fault In Phase A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Timing Reclosure and Persisting
Earth Fault Near Circuit Breaker . . . . . . . 15 Fault . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Multiple Faults on Parallel Lines . . . . . . . 27 Fault Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12, 16, 30
Testing Power Swing Detection . . . . . 37, 43 Line Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
external faults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Output Settings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Source Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11, 28
power transformer test case . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Progress bar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
I
Impedance View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
51
NetSim
Test
R Running the Test . . . . . . . . . . 12, 18, 26, 32
Test Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Report View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Test View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Results and Time Signals . . . . . . . . . 13, 19, 26 Testing Power Swing Detection . . . . 37, 43
Test View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Time Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Time Assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
S Time Signal View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7, 13
Transformer - 2 windings test case . . . . . . . 45
Settings
CB Settings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Measurement Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Output Settings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Solution V
Earth Fault in Phase A . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9, 37 values
Earth Fault Near Circuit Breaker . . . . . . . 15 default values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Fault w/ Autoreclosure & Persisting view
Fault . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Impedance View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Multiple Faults on Parallel Lines . . . . . . . 27 Report View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Multiple faults on parallel lines . . . . . . . . . 27 Results and Time Signals . . . . . . 13, 19, 26
State Sequencer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Test View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6, 7
step transformer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Time Signal View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7, 13
T
Tab
CB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Fault . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Outputs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Sequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Task
Earth Fault in Phase A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Earth Fault in Phase A example . . . . . . . 37
Earth Fault Near Circuit Breaker . . . . . . . 15
Fault with Autoreclosure & Persisting Fault .
21
Fault with Autoreclosure and Persisting
Fault - example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Multiple Faults on Parallel Lines . . . . . . . 27
52