why is the district attorney

When a prosecutor has an uncooperative victim of domestic violence, the prosecutor might still
make the case with testament from a doctor who treated the victim for his/her injuries arising from
the dispute. Declarations made to a medical professional who offered treatment are a recognized
exception to the rumor guideline. The district attorney might obtain the appropriate medical
records by a signed release from the victim or by investigative subpoena. The defense can try to
keep the statements to medical personnel from evidence by convincing the trial court that the
details of the attack were unimportant to the treatment of the injuries.

Why is the district attorney asking the victim for a sworn declaration?

Prior testament under oath is admissible when a supposed victim later ends up being unavailable
due to an assertion of a testimonial advantage. A prosecutor who is worried that a witness may
become uncooperative might consider using a court reporter to make a record of any statement
during the early stages of the prosecution, such as bond hearings or initial hearings. A district
attorney can then refer back to the previous statement to keep the statement constant.

Do professionals testify in domestic attack cases?

While a professional may not "vouch' for the truthfulness of a particular witness, the modern trend
permits domestic violence professionals to explain that particular behavior is not uncommon for
domestic abuse victims. A few of these behaviors consist of failure to leave a violent relationship,
a delay in reporting an attack, or a recantation or refusal to affirm that might seem unusual and
peculiar to a jury absent specialist testimony. Although Missouri is not completely dedicated to
allowing specialist testimony on battered women throughout the prosecution of domestic attack
cases, making use of expert testimony has broadened in child abuse prosecutions and relating to
defendants declaring self-defense in battered partner syndrome cases.

Are my previous crimes admissible?

Evidence of previous or other criminal offenses is typically used in domestic violence cases. Proof
that the accused has physically abused this particular victim in the past is usually admissible to
prove the "animus" of the accused towards the victim. The test utilized is whether the probative
worth of the preceding abuse outweighs the judicial result. In most cases, it has been held
acceptable, particularly when the accused has declared mishap or self-defense. Nevertheless,
when the defendant confesses to the criminal activity, the prejudicial effect of revealing
circumstances of previous abuse can surpass its probative worth.

What effect will a conviction have on my capability to own a weapon?

The 1996 Lautenberg Amendment to the Gun Control Act of 1968 made it unlawful for anyone
founded guilty of a misdemeanor criminal offense of domestic violence to possess a gun.
A suspended imposition of sentence under Texas law would probably not count as a conviction
and for that reason would not disallow subsequent weapons belongings. The Lautenberg
Amendment also makes it a federal criminal offense for a person based on a domestic violence
protective order to have a gun.
helpful resources