0 Stimmen dafür0 Stimmen dagegen

1 Aufrufe48 Seitenamini

Dec 18, 2017

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

amini

© All Rights Reserved

Als PDF, TXT **herunterladen** oder online auf Scribd lesen

1 Aufrufe

amini

© All Rights Reserved

Als PDF, TXT **herunterladen** oder online auf Scribd lesen

- Experiment on solar flux
- Improving the Cooling Performance of Automobile Radiator with TiO2/Water Nanofluid
- ForcedConvectionExternalFlows-ME211
- 469-Alvarez
- Engineering Data Book III REFERENCES
- EFFECT OF VARIABLE VISCOSITY AND THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY OF MICROPOLAR FLUID IN A POROUS CHANNEL IN PRESENCE OF MAGNETIC FIELD
- heat8
- 3a6 Heat Transfer
- Experimental Investigation of a Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger
- lkkk
- Final Report Me
- Thermo Mechanical Joint
- Static mixers as heat exchangers in supercritical fluid extraction processes.pdf
- Natural Convection Heat Transfer in Vertical Internally Finned Tube
- Ies
- mel242-32.ppt
- Rheological Behaviour of Ethylene Glycol Based Titania Nanofluids
- Improvement of Heat Transfer Performances of Biomangnetic Flow in a Rectangular Duct Under Different Types of Magnetic Fields
- 1-s2.0-S0894177714001927-main.pdf
- 7181

Sie sind auf Seite 1von 48

foam tube under constant magnetic field

PII: S0894-1777(16)30359-4

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.12.003

Reference: ETF 8965

Revised Date: 4 December 2016

Accepted Date: 5 December 2016

Please cite this article as: M. Amani, M. Ameri, A. Kasaeian, Investigating the convection heat transfer of Fe3O4

nanofluid in a porous metal foam tube under constant magnetic field, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science

(2016), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.12.003

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers

we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and

review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process

errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Investigating the convection heat transfer of Fe3O4 nanofluid

1

Mechanical and Energy Engineering Department, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2

Department of Renewable Energies Engineering, Faculty of New Sciences &

1

Abstract

Fe3O4/water nanofluid through a porous metal foam tube with uniform heat flux under the

influence of constant magnetic field. This magnetic field is generated by four identical

electromagnets. The electromagnets sequence is one of the most important parameters that

has considerable effect on the convection heat transfer in this subject. Therefore, four

obtained by a numerical simulation using single-phase method in order to reach the higher

heat transfer rate. Furthermore, the effects of Reynolds number, nanofluid weight fraction

and magnetic field intensity on the forced convection heat transfer in the porous metal foam

tube are examined under presence and absence of constant magnetic field. The experimental

results show that the application of Fe3O4/water nanofluid enhances the convection heat

improve the convection heat transfer of nanofluid through the porous metal foam tube. This

heat transfer improvement is more intensified in the lower fluid velocities as well as higher

under applied magnetic field of 200 G (0.02 T) intensity. A new correlation has been

proposed for the Nusselt number of Fe3O4/water nanofluid in terms of Reynolds number,

Prandtl number, nanoparticle weight fraction and magnetic field intensity which predicts the

2

Keywords: Fe3O4 nanofluid; magnetic field; metal foam; forced convection

Nomenclature

D diameter (m)

V voltage (V)

I current (I)

T temperature ( )

P pressure (kPa)

v velocity (m/s)

K permeability (m2)

Re Reynolds number

Pr Prandtl number

3

interfacial heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)

Mn magnet number

Greek letters

density (kg/m3)

porosity

Subscripts

m bulk of fluid

s surface, solid

nf nanofluid

bf base fluid

p particle

w water

1. Introduction

The surface area and thermal conductivity of the working fluid are two substantial factors

which enhances convective heat transfer. Increasing the surface area is obtained by

embedding fins or porous structures like metal foams to the heat transfer medium and the

4

A fluid which is prepared by a dispersion of metallic or non-metallic nanoparticles in the

size of less than 100 nm in a base liquid is called nanofluid. They demonstrate significant

nanoparticles inside the base fluid lead to enhance the thermal conductivity of nanofluids

inside a base fluid which can be controlled under applied magnetic field. They usually

appropriate carrier liquid. There are some experimental and numerical investigations in the

Among the variety of porous materials and structures, open-cell metal foams are comparably

modern and have been extensively used in industrial applications, especially in heat transfer

field, in recent years. Many researchers considered enhancing heat transfer by use of porous

media in different conditions [47]. Some of them focused on augmenting heat transfer by

using novel porous metal foams. Venugopal et al. [8] investigated a simple porous metal

foam and demonstrated that the heat transfer rate enhanced with decreasing porosity. Xu et

al. [9] studied the convection heat transfer of fluid in metal foam filled channel analytically.

Their results showed that increase of pore density and decrease of porosity led to

enhancement of convective heat transfer. Kamath et al. [10] showed that increase in the inlet

velocity of flow led to heat transfer enhancement and increase in the foam thickness had

negligible effect on the pressure loss in the fluid. In another study, Chen et al. [11] revealed

that the higher convection heat transfer in metal foam heat exchanger can be achieved at

Nanofluids can flow through porous media due to small size of the particles. Forced

convection heat transfer of various nanofluids through porous media was investigated by

many researchers. Ghaziani and Hassanipour [12] and Hatami et al. [13] studied the heat

5

transfer of nanofluid through metal foam. They showed that the increase of Reynolds

performance. Siavashi et al. [14] studied the effect of Reynolds number, Darcy number and

porous media radius and position on heat transfer improvement of Al2 O3 nanofluid in a

metallic porous media. Hajipour and Molaei Dehkordi [15] achieved maximum value of

20% enhancement in heat transfer rate of alumina nanofluid inside a vertical channel

partially filled with metal foam at 0.3% nanoparticle volume fraction. Nazari et al. [16]

conducted an investigation on the convection heat transfer behavior and pressure loss of

alumina nanofluids through the porous metal foam tube with constant surface temperature.

The maximum increase in the Nusselt number and pressure drop were about 57% and 39%,

Furthermore, Li and Xuan [17] studied the influence of magnetic field intensity and

their results, applying a uniform magnetic field and negative gradient of magnetic field

decreased the convection heat transfer, while a positive gradient of magnetic field led to the

enhancement of heat transfer. According to the results from the work of Lajvardi et al. [18],

Azizian et al. [19], Esmaeili et al. [20] and Goshayeshi et al. [21,22], it was achieved that

applying constant magnetic field along with increasing the nanoparticle concentration

substantially enhances the heat transfer performance. Ghofrani et al. [23] and Yarahmadi et

al. [24] implemented an alternating magnetic field and observed that average heat transfer

Due to the lack of access to the fluid in porous media, magnetic field is able to provide a

potential of controlling the fluid motion in such medium. A few limited experimental and

magnetic nanofluid in a porous media under magnetic field. Servati et al. [25] studied the

6

effect of applying uniform magnetic field on the hydrodynamics and heat transfer

Boltzmann Method (LBM). The results showed that by increasing the nanoparticle

concentration, the average velocity and temperature at the channel outlet increased

dramatically. In another study, Sheikhnejad et al. [26] simulated laminar forced convection

of magnetic nanofluid under magnetic field in a circular channel partially filled with porous

media. They revealed that the heat transfer enhanced more than 56% by the reduction of

Darcy number from 0.1 to 0.001 and raising the porous media radius ratio from 0.2 to 0.8.

It should be noted that no experimental investigation has been conducted thus far into the

convection heat transfer of Fe3O4/water nanofluids in a porous metal foam tube under

magnetic field and the scarcity of study in this subject is felt vigorously in the literature.

Therefore, this field of study can be taken into account as an open research subject which

heat transfer of Fe3O4/water nanofluid in a metal foam tube under magnetic field. In order to

achieve the maximum heat transfer and find the best location of electromagnets, four

determined by the numerical analysis. Specifically, the convective heat transfer coefficients

of Fe3O4/water nanofluid are measured and presented at two nanoparticle weight fractions,

different Reynolds numbers and magnetic field intensities. The comparison of results and

those obtained from nanofluid flow under no magnetic field and DI-water is also presented.

Reynolds number, Prandtl number, nanoparticle weight fraction and magnetic field intensity.

2. Numerical simulation

7

In order to obtain the best configuration of the experimental setup and find the optimal

filled with porous metal foam under constant magnetic field. Four appropriate configurations

weight fraction and metal foam porosity (Re = 600, = 2 wt% and = 0.8) in the presence

of magnetic field with 100 and 200 G (0.01 and 0.02 T) intensity according to Fig. 1.

The fluid flow is considered laminar, incompressible and steady state. The fluid thermal

properties are assumed to be constant and the metal foam is considered to be isotropic and

homogeneous.

model and local thermal non-equilibrium equation (LTNE) which differentiates between the

temperature of fluid and solid phases. The conservation equations can be calculated as

follows.

Continuity equation:

(1)

Momentum equation:

(2)

Energy equation:

(3)

(4)

where nf and s subscripts refer to nanofluid phase and solid matrix, is density, is thermal

8

Xu et al. [9] and Dai et al. [27] represent the specific parameters of porous metal foam

including permeability K, inertia coefficient Cd, interfacial heat transfer coefficient hsf and

The last term in Eq. (2) represents the Kelvin body force per unit volume applied to the

nanofluid [28]:

(5)

Where B and M are the flux density and magnetization. M can be calculated by the Eq. (6)

[29]:

(6)

where m represents the magnetic moment of a single particle, N is the number of particles in

unit volume and is the argument of Langevin function L() which is determined in Eq. (7).

(7)

Therefore, the Kelvin body force exerted to a single magnetic nanoparticle in unit volume is

determined as follows.

(8)

The volume of unit cell of Fe3O4 magnetite is approximately 7.310 -28 m3 and contains 8

magneton [30]. Therefore, Eq. (9) can be used for determination of the magnetic moment of

(9)

A non-uniform, two-dimensional grid has been used in this numerical study. Since the

temperature and velocity gradients are considerable near the tube entrance and surface of

9

tube, finer grids are employed in these areas. The set of equations are discretized using

control volume technique. SIMPLE method is considered for velocitypressure coupling and

a second order upwind method is used for the diffusive and convective terms. The 30400

grid has been used in the simulation. However, regarding the grid independency approach, it

is observed that applying finer grids has not significant impact on the results. The

convergence criteria for continuity, momentum and energy equations are defined such that

In order to evaluate the current nanofluid modeling, a comparison of numerical results and

the results of Tahir and Mital [31] is performed for Al2O3/water nanofluid through a similar

plain tube at Re = 750 and 4% nanoparticle volume fraction. The validity of numerical

3. Experimental Setup

3.1. Apparatus

A schematic view of the apparatus employed in this study is illustrated in Fig. 3. The setup

consists of two reservoirs, cooling unit, test section and a pump. The copper open-cell

metal foam is fabricated by employing the casting around space holder materials approach.

A hollow foam-like structure in the tube with porosity of 0.8 and pore density of 10 pore

per inch (PPI) is produced as the test section with inner diameter of 17 mm and length of 1

m. A detailed characteristics of the metal foam tube is listed in Table 1. The foam-like

structure of the tube is shown in Fig. 4. A wire heating element is wounded around the

metal foam tube in order to create a uniform heat ux and a glass wool layer is added to

reduce the radial heat dissipation. To avoid the distortion of the magnetic field in the tube,

the wire heating element contains no ferric material. The heat flux is adjusted by an AC

power supply. Temperature profile of the surface of the tube is determined by nine SMT-

10

160 temperature sensors, evenly placed along the tube. Moreover, two temperature sensors

are fixed at tube inlet and outlet for measuring bulk temperatures. A rotameter is used after

the riser section to measure the ow rate. Cooling unit consists of a double-pipe heat

To generate the magnetic eld, four electromagnets consist of U-shape zinc ferrite cores

are employed. A copper wire is wounded around the core to convert the U-shaped core

to magnet. The metal foam tube is placed between the two legs of U-shaped cores. The

by a Gauss meter.

The water based magnetite nanofluid containing Fe3O4 nanoparticles is prepared according

to the method employed by Berger et al. [32]. Commonly, the stoichiometric values of

FeCl3.6H2O and FeCl2 .4H2O equivalent to the chemical composition of Fe 3O4 are

dissolved in DI-water, in which N2 gas is purged to prevent the solution from the

reactions with oxygen. Then, aqueous solution of ammonia is dropwisely added into the

mixture over a period of 5-10 min under the mechanical stirring. The black colored

precipitate is observed and extracted from the mixture using magnetic and centrifugal

fractions of 1% and 2%, the obtained solid particles are dispersed into DI-water. The

ultrasonic processing (150 W, 50 Hz) is done for 45 min to break down the

maintained in a homogeneous stable state for more than 24 h. Fig. 5 shows the prepared

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of Fe3O4 nanoparticles is presented in Fig. 6 (a).

The agreement between the proposed pattern and the reference pattern of Fe3O4 [33,34]

11

demonstrates the purity of the nanoparticles. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

image of the prepared nanoparticles is shown in Fig. 6 (b). The mean particle dimension

Since the data analysis was obtained in weight percent, the conversion between weight and

(10)

where wt represents the weight fraction of nanoparticles and p and f subscripts represent to

The specific heat and bulk density of nanofluid is computed with respect to the conventional

(11)

(12)

It should be noted that since the thermal conductivity and viscosity of magnetic nanofluids

can be affected by the applied external magnetic field, the classical thermal conductivity and

viscosity models cannot predict those of Fe3O4/water nanofluid under magnetic field.

Therefore, Karimi et al. [35] and Wang et al. [36] proposed an empirical correlation to

predict the thermal conductivity and viscosity of Fe3O4/water nanofluid under the influence

(13)

(14)

where B represents the magnetic flux in G and T denotes the temperature in C. Bmin and Tmin

have the values of 100 G and 20 C respectively. bf is the thermal conductivity of base fluid

12

(15)

For assessment of the reliability of the experiments, the local Nusselt number of DI-water

through the similar plain tube is compared with Shah equation presented in Eq. (16) at

constant Reynolds number [37]. Fig. 7 presents a good agreement between the experimental

(16)

The local heat transfer coefcient (h) required for the analysis of the heat transfer

(17)

where and are the bulk temperature of fluid and the surface temperature of tube,

respectively, q" represents the constant heat flux calculated by Eq. (18) and x denotes the

(18)

where L, D and Q are the tube length, tube diameter and the rate of heat transfer,

(19)

where Q1 and Q2 are the rate of heat transfer from the AC power supply and those measured

(20)

(21)

13

where V is the voltage and I is the wire heating element current. Tm,out and Tm,in are the outlet

It is observed that heat transfer rate from the AC power supply obtained from Eq. (20) and

that determined from experimental data using Eq. (21) have different values which might

due to heat dissipation during the experiments. Therefore, in order to reduce the error

Furthermore, Eq. (22) is used to compute the average fluid bulk temperature.

(22)

(23)

An uncertainty analysis is used to evaluate the errors related to the experiments (i.e. heat

flux and Nusselt number). The uncertainty of the heat flux and Nusselt number are

calculated as follows.

(24)

(25)

The uncertainties of measurements for the parameters involved in this analysis are listed in

Table 3. The average uncertainty in calculation of heat flux and Nusselt number are 1.6%

The appropriate location of the electromagnets has been investigated numerically prior to the

heat transfer experiments in order to maximize the convection heat transfer. After finding

14

the best location of electromagnets and validation of the experimental results with DI-water,

experiments are performed for five Reynolds numbers ranging from 200 to 1000 and

nanoparticle weight fractions of 1% and 2% in the absence and presence of magnetic field

considering the arrangements I, II, III, and IV shown in Fig. 1. The variation of the local

heat transfer coefficients obtained in these four configurations is provided at Re = 600 and

= 2 wt% in the presence of constant magnetic field with 100 and 200 G (0.01 and 0.02 T)

intensity in Fig. 8. The simulation results show that the heat transfer coefficient in

arrangement I, where the distance between the electromagnets is shorter and locating near

the entrance of tube, is greater than three other arrangements. It is observed that the

nanofluid heat transfer increases when it enters the magnetic field domain, while the

convection heat transfer decreases after passing this area. This enhancement corroborate that

applying magnetic field leads to reduction in thermal boundary layer thickness. However,

the thermal boundary layer develops again after eliminating the magnetic field, resulting in

lower increase of heat transfer rate. The heat transfer improvement due to presence of 200 G

(0.02 T) magnetic field for arrangements I, II, III and IV are obtained 5.5%, 3.4%, 3.5% and

arrangement I led to a maximum of 5.5% and 3.5% improvement in convective heat transfer

under applying magnetic field with 100 and 200 G (0.01 and 0.02 T) intensity respectively.

The effect of Reynolds number on average Nusselt number of Fe3O4/water nanofluids along

with DI-water with no magnetic field is shown in Fig. 9. It is seen that increase of Reynolds

15

number increases the average heat transfer coefficient. For instance, at the nanofluid weight

transfer is obtained. This value for weight fraction of 1% and Re = 1000 jumps to 12.3%.

transfer. A heat transfer improvement of 9.3% and 16.8% is observed at the Reynolds

DI-water. It should be noted that further increasing the nanofluid concentration, will not lead

sedimentation in the metal foam tube increases and a portion of nanoparticles in the center

of the tube may not receive much heat, which results in decreasing the participation of

the other hand, inserting metal foam as a porous media in the tube can considerably enhance

the heat transfer due to the fact that it involves all nanoparticles in heat transfer process

It is observed that the effect of nanoparticle weight fraction on heat transfer improvement is

more profound at high Reynolds numbers. It is due to the better agitation of fluid layers,

entrance length will increase over the tube with increment of Reynolds number. The increase

in heat transfer coefficient is superior at short axial distance from the entrance of the tube in

Fig. 10 shows the effect of axial distance from the entrance of the tube on the local Nusselt

number at two different Reynolds numbers. As Fig. 10 depicts, the increase in the

nanoparticle weight fraction leads to increase in the local Nusselt number thorough the metal

16

foam tube. Moreover, the heat transfer coefficient decreases with increasing the axial

distance due to the increase in the thermal boundary layer and eventually it tends to a

It is concluded that the heat transfer augmentation due to addition of high conductive

nanoparticles to the base fluid is a key parameter in heat transfer enhancement. There are

two mechanisms for the thermal conductivity enhancement of the magnetic nanofluids, i.e.

particle clustering and Brownian motion [38]. The aggregation of magnetic nanoparticles

into linear chains or dispersed clusters have a considerable impact on the nanofluid

nanofluid. Therefore, it extends the heat transfer since the solid particles conduct the heat

flow much faster in comparison with the base fluid. Furthermore, the Brownian motion can

improve the thermal conductivity of the nanofluid using the indirect method due to the

expected that by improving the effective thermal conductivity, the rate of heat diffusion

increases.

The local Nusselt number are determined under the application of the magnetic field with

intensities of 100 and 200 G (0.01 and 0.02 T). Fig. 11 presents the average Nusselt number

versus Reynolds number for DI-water and Fe3O4/water nanofluids under the magnetic field.

It clearly reveals that the Nusselt number improves with increasing the magnetic field

intensity. Applying the magnetic field with 100 G (0.01 T) intensity, enhances the heat

transfer, reaching to a maximum of 5.9%, compared to the no magnetic field case using

under the magnetic field intensity of 200 G (0.02 T). The application of magnetic field

compels the nanoparticles to migrate toward the heated surface of the tube. In the absence of

17

magnetic field, the nanoparticles distribution is disordered and the thermal conductivity of

nanofluid is isotropic [39]. On the other hand, in the presence of magnetic field, the

nanoparticles tend to align in the magnetic field direction and lead to anisotropy of thermal

fluctuation and dispersion of nanoparticles near the uniformly heated surface of the tube, the

It is determined that the effect of magnetic field on the heat transfer is stronger at low

Reynolds numbers. In this condition, the magnetic forces will increase which lead to

attracting the nanoparticles toward the heated surface due to higher nanoparticles residence

time. Additionally, it is concluded that the maximum growth of heat transfer decreases from

8.5% to 5.9% by a 50% reduction in the magnetic field intensity. It is because of less

variations in thermal boundary layer thickness and also, decreasing the forces applied on the

nanoparticles.

The variation of local Nusselt number with the axial distance for the Fe3O4/water nanofluid

at two Reynolds numbers, 200 and 1000, with magnetic field intensities, 100 and 200 G

(0.01 and 0.02 T), are shown in Figs. 12 and 13. It is seen that the local Nusselt number

initially increases under magnetic field until a maximum value is reached (T3 sensor) and

then begins to decrease tending to the value of heat transfer coefficient at the end of the tube

under no magnetic field. The migration of nanoparticles and their movement toward the

surface of tube decreases the boundary layer thickness which results in heat transfer

improvement. The increase of heat transfer as the nanofluid flows along the applying

magnetic field region, is due to considerable decrease in the thermal boundary layer

thickness. However, beyond the applied magnetic field region, the reduction of heat transfer

can be referred to the lack of magnetic forces which leads to higher boundary layer

thickness.

18

Heat transfer improvement under magnetic field due to the use of Fe3O4/water nanofluid

can be defined as Nunf / Nuw, where Nunf and Nuw represents the average Nusselt number

for the nanofluid and DI-water, respectively. Fig. 14 shows the variation of heat transfer

performance under the influence of magnetic field for two nanoparticle weight fractions

and magnetic field intensities. As discussed previously, it is achieved that the effect of

Reynolds numbers and also, applying magnetic field plays a substantial role at low

magnetic field with 200 G (0.02 T) intensity. In addition, the pressure drop of the nanofluid

with different concentrations in the absence and presence of magnetic field is presented in

Appendix A.

It should be noted that (1) a chain like cluster of Fe 3O4 nanoparticles, (2) interaction between

the nanofluid flow and accumulation of nanoparticles at the surface of the tube adjacent to

each magnet and (3) the ratio of magnetic to inertia forces exerting on the nanofluid, are

three effective mechanisms which considerably affects the heat transfer performance in the

In order to consider the magnetic field intensity, a dimensionless magnet number (Mn) is

defined as follows.

(26)

where B is the magnetic field intensity in G, 0 represents the permeability of vacuum with

19

Therefore, a new correlation is derived based on the experimental observations in order to

predict the Nusselt number of Fe3O4/water nanofluid flowing through the porous metal foam

with the porosity of 0.8 under constant magnetic field. This correlation is presented as

below.

(27)

Fig. 15 shows the deviation of experimental data and the results which have been calculated

by the proposed correlation. It can be inferred that the values of Nusselt number evaluated

with Eq. (27) are in satisfactory agreement with the experimental results. The Average

Absolute Relative Error (AARE) and R2 values of derived correlation are 1.62% and 0.987

respectively.

5. Conclusion

In this research, the effect of constant magnetic field on convection heat transfer of

Fe3O4/water nanofluid in a uniformly heated metal foam tube is investigated. The optimum

using single-phase nanofluid modeling in order to maximize the heat transfer performance.

Arrangement I (see Fig. 1) is obtained as the best setup configuration. It is observed that the

effect of constant magnetic field is more noticeable near the entrance of tube.

investigated and the effect of the Fe3O4 nanoparticle weight fraction, Reynolds numbers as

well as different magnetic field intensities has been studied. The results are presented below.

Under no magnetic field, the convection heat transfer of Fe3O4/water nanofluids are

20

Increment of nanoparticle weight fraction leads to enhancement of heat transfer. The

heat transfer enhancement of 9.3% and 16.8% has been achieved at the Reynolds number of

The higher magnetic field intensity, the higher average Nusselt number is achieved.

Applying magnetic field with 100 G (0.01 T) intensity, enhances the heat transfer only up to

a maximum of 5.9%, compared to the absence of magnetic field using nanofluid with = 2

wt% at Re = 200. While, it can be augments up to 8.5% under magnetic field intensity of

The application of magnetic field compels the nanoparticles to migrate toward the

heated surface of the tube. Due to high conductivity of nanoparticles, the chaotic migration,

fluctuation and dispersion of nanoparticles near the uniformly heated surface of the tube,

Applying magnetic field has profound impact on heat transfer performance at low

Reynolds numbers.

dispersion of 2 wt% nanofluid inside the DI-water at Re = 200 under magnetic field with

Reynolds number, Prandtl number, nanoparticle weight fraction and magnetic field intensity

Appendix A

The pressure drop of the water based Fe3O4 nanofluid is listed in Table A1.

21

References

water base ferrofluids under magnetic field, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 41 (2012) 9498.

conductivity and viscosity of TiO2-water nanofluids, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 33 (2009)

706714.

[4] T. Dixit, I. Ghosh, An experimental study on open cell metal foam as extended heat

[6] S. Mancin, C. Zilio, A. Diani, L. Rossetto, Experimental air heat transfer and pressure

drop through copper foams, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 36 (2012) 224232.

[7] R. Dyga, M. Paczek, Heat transfer through metal foamfluid system, Exp. Therm.

heat transfer in a vertical duct filled with metallic porous structures, Int. J. Therm. Sci.

49 (2010) 340348.

[9] H.J. Xu, Z.G. Qu, W.Q. Tao, Thermal transport analysis in parallel-plate channel filled

with open-celled metallic foams, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 38 (2011) 868873.

[10] P.M. Kamath, C. Balaji, S.P. Venkateshan, Convection heat transfer from aluminium

22

and copper foams in a vertical channel - An experimental study, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 64

(2013) 110.

double-pipe heat exchangers, Numer. Heat Transf. Part A Appl. 68 (2015) 10311049.

Rectangular Porous Channel, ASME 2012 Int. Mech. Eng. Congr. Expo. (2012) 713

720.

[13] M. Hatami, M. Sheikholeslami, D.D. Ganji, Nanofluid flow and heat transfer in an

asymmetric porous channel with expanding or contracting wall, J. Mol. Liq. 195

(2014) 230239.

annular pipe partially or completely filled with porous media using two-phase mixture

a channel partially filled with porous metal foam: Experimental and numerical study,

heat transfer of a nanofluid through a pipe filled with metal foam, Int. J. Therm. Sci.

88 (2015) 3339.

fluid flow around a fine wire under the influence of an external magnetic field, Exp.

23

investigation for enhanced ferrofluid heat transfer under magnetic field effect, J. Magn.

[21] H.R. Goshayeshi, M. Goodarzi, M. Dahari, Effect of Magnetic Field on the Heat

Transfer Rate of Kerosene / Fe2O3 Nanofluid in a Copper Oscillating Heat Pipe, Exp.

[22] H.R. Goshayeshi, M. Goodarzi, M.R. Safaei, M. Dahari, Experimental study on the

oscillating heat pipe under magnetic field, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 74 (2016) 265270.

[23] A. Ghofrani, M.H. Dibaei, A.H. Sima, M.B. Shafii, Experimental investigation on

laminar forced convective heat transfer of ferrofluids under constant and oscillating

magnetic field with different magnetic field arrangements and oscillation modes, Exp.

[25] A.A. Servati V., K. Javaherdeh, H.R. Ashorynejad, Magnetic field effects on force

convection flow of a nanofluid in a channel partially filled with porous media using

24

horizontal tube partially filled with porous media in the presence of a magnetic, J.

[27] Z. Dai, K. Nawaz, Y. Park, J. Bock, A. Jacobi, Correcting and extending the

fluid-saturated metal foams, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 37 (2010) 575580.

[28] M. Zborowski, J. Chalmers, Magnetic cell separation, Vol. 32, Elsevier, 2011.

[29] H. Yamaguchi, Engineering fluid mechanics, Vol. 85, Springer Science & Business

Media, 2008.

[31] S. Tahir, M. Mital, Numerical investigation of laminar nanofluid developing flow and

361366.

of Fe3O4 nanoparticles filled into multiwalled carbon nanotubes, Synth. Met. 187

(2014) 7580.

and Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanofluids Under the Influence of Magnetic Field, Int. J.

nanofluid under magnetic field, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 72 (2016) 2328.

25

[37] R. Shah, A. London, Laminar flow forced convection in ducts, 1978.

[38] J. Eapen, R. Rusconi, R. Piazza, S. Yip, The Classical Nature of Thermal Conduction

[39] A.O. Ivanov, S.S. Kantorovich, V.S. Mendelev, E.S. Pyanzina, Ferrofluid aggregation

in chains under the influence of a magnetic field, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 300 (2006)

206209.

[40] M. Asfer, B. Mehta, A. Kumar, S. Khandekar, P.K. Panigrahi, Effect of magnetic field

circular stainless steel tube, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow. 59 (2016) 7486.

Figure Captions:

Fig. 2 Comparison of simulation results with those obtained by Tahir and Mital for Re = 750

and = 4 vol%.

Fig. 4 Test section and porous metal foam inside the tube

Fig. 7 Comparison of the local Nusselt number with those calculated by Shah equation at Re

= 400

Fig. 8 Local heat transfer coefficient versus the tube length for different electromagnets

Fig. 9 Experimental average Nusselt number versus Reynolds number for DI-water and

Fe3O4/water nanofluids

26

Fig. 10 Local heat transfer coefficient versus the axial distance for water and Fe3O4/water

Fig. 11 Variation of Nusselt number versus Reynolds number under different magnetic

Fig. 12 Local heat transfer coefficient versus axial distance for nanofluids with different

weight fractions at Re = 200 in presence of magnetic field with (a) 100 G (0.01 T) (b) 200 G

(0.02 T) intensity

Fig. 13 Local Nusselt number versus axial distance for nanofluids with different weight

fractions at Re = 1000 in presence of magnetic field with (a) 100 G (0.01 T) (b) 200 G (0.02

T) intensity

Fig. 14 Heat transfer enhancement versus Reynolds number for two nanoparticle weight

Fig. 15 Comparison between experimental results and those calculated by Eq. (27)

Table Captions:

Table A1. The pressure drop of the nanofluid in the metal foam tube in kPa

27

Figures:

28

2000

Present simulation

1800

Tahir and Mita [33]

1600

1400

h (W/ m K)

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

x/L

Fig. 2 Comparison of simulation results with those obtained by Tahir and Mital for Re = 750

and = 4 vol%

29

Fig. 3 The schematic of the apparatus

30

Fig. 4 Test section and porous metal foam inside the tube

31

Fig. 5 Prepared Fe3O4/water nanofluid with 1 wt% and 2 wt% concentrations

32

Fig. 6 (a) XRD and (b) SEM image of Fe3O4 nanoparticles

33

25

Shah Equation

Experimental data

20

Nu15

10

0

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0

x(m)

Fig. 7 Comparison of the local Nusselt number with those calculated by Shah equation at Re

= 400

34

850

(a) No magnetic field

800

Arrangement I

750 Arrangment II

700 Arrangement III

650 Arrangement IV

h(W/m K) 600

550

500

450

400

350

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

x(m)

850

(b) No magnetic field

800

Arrangement I

750

Arrangment II

700

Arrangement III

650

h(W/m K)

Arrangement IV

600

550

500

450

400

350

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

x(m)

Fig. 8 Local heat transfer coefficient versus the tube length for different electromagnets

35

18

DI water

17

= 1 wt%

16 = 2 wt%

15

14

Nu

13

12

11

10

9

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

Re

Fig. 9 Experimental average Nusselt number versus Reynolds number for DI-water and

Fe3O4/water nanofluids

36

15

(a) DI-water

14 = 1 wt%

13 = 2 wt%

12

Nu

11

10

9

8

7

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

x(m)

32

(b) DI-water

= 1 wt%

27

= 2 wt%

22

Nu

17

12

7

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

x(m)

Fig. 10 Local Nusselt number versus the axial distance for water and Fe3O4/water nanofluids

37

20

DI-water

18 B=0G

B = 100 G

16 B = 200 G

Nu 14

12

10

8

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

Re

Fig. 11 Variation of Nusselt number versus Reynolds number under different magnetic

38

15

14 (a) DI-water

13 = 1 wt%

12 = 2 wt%

11

Nu 10

9

8

7

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

x(m)

15

14

(b) DI-water

= 1 wt%

13

= 2 wt%

12

11

Nu

10

9

8

7

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

x(m)

Fig. 12 Local Nusselt number versus axial distance for nanofluids with different weight

fractions at Re = 200 in presence of magnetic field with (a) 100 G (0.01 T) (b) 200 G (0.02

T) intensity

39

30

28 (a) DI-water

26 = 1 wt%

24 = 2 wt%

22

Nu

20

18

16

14

12

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

x(m)

30

28 (b) DI-water

26 = 1 wt%

24 = 2 wt%

22

20

Nu

18

16

14

12

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

x(m)

Fig. 13 Local Nusselt number versus axial distance for nanofluids with different weight

fractions at Re = 1000 in presence of magnetic field with (a) 100 G (0.01 T) (b) 200 G (0.02

T) intensity

40

1.3

B = 0 G , = 1 wt% B = 0 G , = 2 wt%

B = 100 G , = 1 wt% B = 100 G , = 2 wt%

1.25 B = 200 G , = 1 wt% B = 200 G , = 2 wt%

h_nf/h_w

1.2

1.15

1.1

1.05

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

Re

Fig. 14 Heat transfer enhancement versus Reynolds number for two nanoparticle weight

41

18

Nu (Empirical correlation)

16

14

12

10

8

8 10 12 14 16 18

Nu (Experimental data)

Fig. 15 Comparison between experimental results and those calculated by Eq. (27)

42

Tables:

Porosity 0.8

Pore density (PPI) 10

Average fiber diameter (df) 0.45 mm

Average pore diameter (dp) 2.6 mm

Permeability 5.110-8 m2

43

Table 2. Thermal properties of nanoparticle

3

(kg/m ) (J/kg K) (W/m K)

Fe3o4 nanoparticle 5200 670 80

44

Table 3. Uncertainties of instruments and properties

Voltage, 0.45

Current, 0.77

Temperature, 0.47

Mass flow rate, 1.25

45

Table A1. The pressure drop of the nanofluid in the metal foam tube in kPa

Re DI-water

1 wt% 2 wt% 1 wt% 2 wt% 1 wt% 2 wt%

200 107.9 113.8 119.7 115.7 125.7 116.9 129.6

400 235.4 247.3 259.4 249.4 263.3 252.3 269.4

600 343.3 366.1 379.1 371.0 385.1 376.1 389.3

800 461.1 484.7 508.7 489.8 516.7 495.2 528.5

1000 559.2 593.5 628.4 601.5 638.4 606.1 649.1

46

Highlights:

Experiments are performed with Fe3O4/water nanofluid through metal foam tube.

examined.

The effect of magnetic field is more noticeable near the entrance of tube.

47

- Experiment on solar fluxHochgeladen vonAbhishek Kumar
- Improving the Cooling Performance of Automobile Radiator with TiO2/Water NanofluidHochgeladen vonInternational Journal for Scientific Research and Development - IJSRD
- ForcedConvectionExternalFlows-ME211Hochgeladen von2gangadhara
- 469-AlvarezHochgeladen vondawitabutu
- Engineering Data Book III REFERENCESHochgeladen vonFrancisco Suárez
- EFFECT OF VARIABLE VISCOSITY AND THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY OF MICROPOLAR FLUID IN A POROUS CHANNEL IN PRESENCE OF MAGNETIC FIELDHochgeladen vonIJBSS,ISSN:2319-2968
- heat8Hochgeladen vonAhmedd Ali Adnan
- 3a6 Heat TransferHochgeladen vonPablo Peñas
- Experimental Investigation of a Printed Circuit Heat ExchangerHochgeladen vonGogulakrishnan Vivekanandam
- lkkkHochgeladen vonEtu-Efeotor Odesiri
- Final Report MeHochgeladen vonʞǝǝs Uǝ Ǝpıɥ
- Thermo Mechanical JointHochgeladen vonAndy Vallee
- Static mixers as heat exchangers in supercritical fluid extraction processes.pdfHochgeladen vonJoão Fernandes
- Natural Convection Heat Transfer in Vertical Internally Finned TubeHochgeladen vonAdarsh Kumar Ang
- IesHochgeladen vonKarthick Ram
- mel242-32.pptHochgeladen vonMohammad Omar
- Rheological Behaviour of Ethylene Glycol Based Titania NanofluidsHochgeladen vonDian Apriyani
- Improvement of Heat Transfer Performances of Biomangnetic Flow in a Rectangular Duct Under Different Types of Magnetic FieldsHochgeladen vonijteee
- 1-s2.0-S0894177714001927-main.pdfHochgeladen voncusma_cristiana
- 7181Hochgeladen vonJimmy Caesario Denata
- 1-s2.0-S1001605815604589-mainHochgeladen vonSubhendu Maity
- Semi-steady state steam water flow.pdfHochgeladen vonvitaxn
- Heat Transfer Augmentation in Different Geometries of Dimpled Surface Under Natural ConvectionHochgeladen vonesatjournals
- Dimple Tubes JSOseHochgeladen vonvilasap
- Fluid Dynamics in MicrochannelsHochgeladen vonthlpap
- Comment on the paper “Investigation of squeezing unsteady nanofluid flow using ADM, M. Sheikholeslami, D.D. Ganji, H.R. Ashorynejad, Powder Technology 239 (2013) 259–265”Hochgeladen vonPanos Palam
- 49274426 Wind Tunnel Lab ReportHochgeladen vonaya khazraji
- Sistemas de scalingHochgeladen vonThiago Roberto
- Heat Transfer Enhancement Using Aluminium Oxide Nanofluid: Effect of the Base FluidHochgeladen vonAI Coordinator - CSC Journals
- materialesHochgeladen vonmarialuisaldv

- Bolts PreloadHochgeladen vonBruno Gondim
- 93787cf6e75c0045977c77c2f15288d5960dHochgeladen vonali
- M-mtritfzeao Analysis of GradientHochgeladen vonali
- yu2009Hochgeladen vonali
- Survey_Map_Projections.xlsHochgeladen vonrelu59
- FlangeHochgeladen vonali
- Bolted Joint CalculatorHochgeladen vonPandiyarajan Raju
- PLHochgeladen vonali
- test.docxHochgeladen vonali

- green coatings.pdfHochgeladen vonSumit Tated
- 2009 DFT a Practical Introduction KITAPHochgeladen vongozyonum
- Gong2015 Sintesis de Aerogeles SnO2-GrafenoHochgeladen vonMarissa Lzro
- 18225-Article Text-81558-1-10-20170301.pdfHochgeladen vonMuhammad Tariq Raza
- The Potential of Nanofibers and Nanobiocides in WaterHochgeladen vonMadya Agus
- Chapter 4 - EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON PARTICLE SIZE.pdfHochgeladen vonAnonymous gcMAj2IXl
- ZnO NanoparticlesHochgeladen vonadharsh27
- Flame 2010 BrochureHochgeladen vonManjunatha Eikila
- 1-s2.0-S0360319911020039-mainHochgeladen vondeni.sttn
- Glotzer_Solomon_NatureMat_2007_Anisotropy of Building Blocks and Their Assembly Into Complex StructuresHochgeladen vonIrina Ivanova
- Cancer NanotechnologyHochgeladen vonAndrew Tan
- Carbon Black Dust - The Chemtrail Secret for Weather Warfare, Geoengineering, And Ozone DestructionHochgeladen vonJim Lee ClimateViewer
- Enhancement of Thermal Conductivity of Engine Coolant(HP Kool Gard )Hochgeladen vonGs Pavan Kumar
- Recent advances in the research of polyanion.pdfHochgeladen vonVandam65
- Clove SynthesisHochgeladen vonKeerthi B K Gowda
- Preparation of Silver Nanoparticles and Their CharacterizationHochgeladen vonriniguez
- Nano HydroxyHochgeladen vonHusnain Indra
- Apply nanoparticle in bio& medicineHochgeladen vonhienlt33
- 1-s2.0-S0304885311005981-mainHochgeladen vonJoshua Aditya
- Nano PharmacologyHochgeladen vonMohanad Al-Bayati
- GREEN SYNTHESIS OF ANNONA MURICATA (L) ZNO NPS UV ABSORBER ON TEXTILE.Hochgeladen vonIJAR Journal
- APT_720Hochgeladen vonSapto Gatacha
- Solution combustion synthesis, energy and environment: Best parameters for better materialHochgeladen vonBFC
- Dan Peer et al- Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapyHochgeladen vonGmso3
- 2009 Review of Convective Heat Transfer Enhancement With NanofluidsHochgeladen vonAnonymous 7BQxlt8c
- 2011 Ahlin NP preparation JMicroencaps 2011.pdfHochgeladen vonUriel Peña
- XiGo Note 120 Au & Ag Nanoparticle AgingHochgeladen vonprakush01975225403
- A. Prakash, A. V. McCormick and M. R. Zachariah- Tuning the Reactivity of Energetic Nanoparticles by Creation of a Core-Shell NanostructureHochgeladen vonAlarmak
- Abstracts book part IIHochgeladen vonNeeru Redhu
- GNN3 - D.W. Weener, NetherlandsHochgeladen vonMaterials Research Institute

## Viel mehr als nur Dokumente.

Entdecken, was Scribd alles zu bieten hat, inklusive Bücher und Hörbücher von großen Verlagen.

Jederzeit kündbar.