Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The conduct of elections in the Philippines for the past four decades has remained largely
unchanged. Philippine elections rely heavily on manual tallying and canvassing of votes thus
making them vulnerable to control and manipulation by traditional politicians and those with
vested interests.
The cost of winning an elective post is highly expensive and the absence of mechanisms
to check and limit sources of campaign funds become fertile grounds for corruption and
divisiveness.
In recent years, initiatives to reform the electoral system included the enactment of the
following laws: Republic Act (RA) 8046, establishing a pilot program modernizing the
registration and vote counting process in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao, the
Party List Law, Fair Elections Act and the Absentee Voting Act. To address the inadequacies
and limitations of the electoral process, RA 8436 or the Election Automation Act of 1997, was
passed authorizing the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) to use automated election system
for vote counting and canvassing in the national and local polls. The law provided for the
generation of a national computerized voters list, establishment of a voters identification card
system and the automation of the vote counting.
Notwithstanding the rapid advances in technology, the Philippines has until recently been
living in the Stone Age when it comes to the conduct of elections. Elections in the Philippines
have always been undertaken manually, where the counting of votes could take months before
the winners are proclaimed. This is especially the case for elections involving national positions,
which are prone to cheating and other electoral frauds. Proponents of poll automation hope to
lessen, if not solve, these perennial problems.
Philippine elections are held in May every three years for both national and local
positions. The national positions are president, vice president, senators and party-list
representatives. Local positions are governors, vice governors, board members, mayors, vice
mayors, councilors and congressmen.
Together with the presidential form of government, the electoral system has set the
institutional frame for the development of Philippine political parties. The current electoral
system is established in the 1987 constitution.
The president and vice president are elected nationally for six year terms with no re-
election allowed. The national legislature is bicameral, with a lower house of 200 representatives
elected in single member district constituencies for three year terms, plus sectoral representatives
appointed by the President. The 24 member Senate has senators elected for six year terms
nationally, half elected every three years. Representatives are limited to three terms, senators to
two.
Local government officials (governors, provincial councils, municipal and city mayors,
municipal and city councils) are elected to three year terms, with a three term limit. Senators,
congressmen and local government officials are elected in mid-term elections, but during
presidential election years, everyone is elected at the same time. During synchronized elections,
more than 17,000 positions are filled. Elections for barangay government, the lowest level of
government roughly corresponding to rural villages and urban neighborhoods are held separately.
The system has been "first past the post", whoever wins the most number of votes, wins.
Voting in the Philippines has required writing down the names of individual candidates. This has
created problems especially during synchronized elections when voters have to write down
anywhere from 32 to 44 names on the ballot. Another set of problems occurs as a result of the
long period required for counting and canvassing of votes cast. Votes are counted by hand at the
precinct level, then precinct returns canvassed at the municipal level, municipal returns at the
provincial level, and only then added up at the COMELEC in Manila, a process that can take
over a month.
Parties are required to register with the COMELEC with a verified petition with
attachments including a constitution, by-laws, platform, and such other information as may be
required by the COMELEC. They are required to have chapters in a majority of regions, and
within each region, a majority of provinces, down to towns and barangays.
cc
The Omnibus Election Code or Batas Pambansa Bilang 881 is the basic law on elections.
This was enacted into law on December 3, 1985. It codified all previous election laws and
underwent some amendments basically by the 1987 Constitution, Republic Act No. 6646 or
known as ³The Electoral Reform Law of 1987,´ and Republic Act No. 7166, providing for
synchronized national and local elections on May 11, 1992.
While legislations have been enacted every time an election for elective officials is
scheduled, the Omnibus Election Code remains the fundamental law on the subject and such
pieces of legislations are designed to improve the law and to achieve the holding of free, orderly,
honest, peaceful and credible elections.
A Board of Election Inspectors (BEI), composed of three people who are mostly public
school teachers, mans the polling precincts. At the end of voting, the BEI proceeds to manually
count the votes by reading the names of voted candidates on each ballot in the presence of poll
watchers and recording the number of votes for each candidate on a tally sheet called election
return (ER). The ERs and ballot boxes are then transported to the city or municipal hall where
the results contained in the ERs from all precincts are canvassed or totalled. At this point, the
winning local officials, with the exception of congressmen, are proclaimed.
Copies of ERs generated at the precinct level are transmitted to the province (much like a
county in the US), Comelec and Congress for the canvass of votes, and proclamation of winners,
for congressmen and provincial/city officials, senators and party-list representatives, and
president and vice president, respectively.
Manual elections obtained trust from the people through almost a century of
history. Having that kind of background it gives confidence and relays the message that
election will push through no matter what.
Although the Poll Modernization Law took effect as early as 1997, it is only now that
computerization of Philippine elections is being seriously considered. With the passage of RA
9369 in 2007, which amended RA 8436, Comelec has been mandated to computerize the
upcoming May 2010 elections. For this purpose, the Comelec has contracted with the Dutch
company Smartmatic and its local partner Total Information Management, Inc. (TIM) on July 10,
for the supply of Precinct Count Optical Scan (PCOS) machines. The PCOS are a form of
Optical Mark Reader (OMR) machines that function by reading and counting the markings made
by voters on the ballots after the same are fed to the machines.
The first automated election was held in ARMM last August 11, 2008. There were a lot of
³firsts´ during this historical event: First fraud-free election in more than half a century; first
time the winning candidates were proclaimed in less than two days after election day; first to use
electronic voting and transmission machines in a Philippine electoral exercise; first time election
results have been uncontested; first elections with practically no reports of voter
disenfranchisement; and first elections where the rate of failure of elections is less than 1 percent.
Voters¶ turnout was greater than expected, reaching 90% of the expected voting population.
On February 25, UP Diliman(UPD) held its first campus-wide computerized University
Student Council (USC) elections. The open source voting system, called ³Halalan´, was created
by the University of the Philippines Lifinux Users Group (UnPLUG), a student organization at
the College of Engineering (CoE). The colleges provided the computers for the elections. The
voting process started with students presenting their IDs or Form-5s to attending poll clerks, who
checked the list of valid voters. Students on the list then received their passwords from the poll
clerks and proceeded to unoccupied voting stations. Using their student numbers and the
passwords provided as login information, they opened their electronic ballots and marked the
boxes of their chosen candidates. Once they clicked the confirm button, their votes were final
and they were automatically logged out. The system allows voters to log in again but only to
check their votes, not change them. The first working prototype of Halalan was created in
January 2005 and presented to UPD student councils and student publications later that month at
the Palma Hall Lobby. Its first application in the USC elections was at the CoE and the School of
Statistics in 2007. A year later, the College of Business Administration, the College of Mass
Communication, and the School of Library and Information Science also adopted the system.
The Philippines has approximately 47 million registered voters scattered in about 320,000
precincts. Each precinct has, at most, 200 voters. In order to maximize the benefit and cost of
each PCOS machine, one will be assigned to each clustered precinct of at most five precincts.
Obviously, some clusters will have less than five precincts since some remote areas may have
less than 1,000 population. Thus, a single machine will be handling a maximum of 1,000 ballots.
Comelec estimates the clustered precincts to number 80,136 hence the purchase of about 82,200
PCOS machines. Each clustered precinct will have a Board of Election Inspectors comprising
three regular members and as many support staff as there are precincts in the cluster.
A few days before Election Day, there will be a testing and sealing procedure whereby
the public will accomplish test ballots, manually count them and then feed the same ballots to the
PCOS machines. The print-out of the election returns will be compared to the manual count.
Once the public is satisfied with the accuracy, the machine will be turned off and sealed without
any network or transmission connection. The public will then be allowed to secure the machines
and the polling places. The next time the PCOS machines will be opened will be on Election
Day, in the presence of the different watchers and BEI.
,
1. Paper-based election system
2. Direct Recording Electronic (DRE)
The paper-based election system is defined as ³a type of automated election system that
uses paper ballots, records and counts votes, tabulates, consolidates, canvasses and transmits
electronically the results of the vote count.´ It uses the Optical Mark Reader (OMR) Technology.
Here, the voters have to shade the oval which corresponds to their candidate of choice
using pencil in a specially scanned paper ballot. It is composed of 2 Laptops, 2 Digital Scanners,
2 card readers, 1 hub and 1 printer. The votes in the shaded ballots will then be scanned and
counted using an Automated Counting Machine (ACM).
The ballot is scanned by the PCOS machine on both sides simultaneously and a scanned
image of the ballot is taken by the machine and stored in its memory module. The machine will
likewise store a report on how it interpreted the ballot image that was recently scanned. This will
be helpful in an eventual audit or manual recount. In case of power failure, the machines are
certified to operate on back-up power for at least 12 hours. At the end of Election Day, the BEI
will seal and shut down the PCOS machine and will print 8 copies of the election returns.
Thereafter, the PCOS will electronically transmit the electronic election return to several servers,
namely the Comelec server, municipal server, and the servers for election watchdogs. The
electronic transmission, which will take only a few seconds or minutes, will use redundant
transmission facilities whether via cable, wireless or satellite technology.
Additionally, it will be secured and encrypted using the same standards as what the banks
use for wiring money. Hopefully, we will know the results within 48 hours. By the way, Comelec
will also be posting the results of the transmission on-line. Thus, the general public may view the
results from each precinct or district or province as they come in.
0
Automated Counting Machine is almost similar to what is used in the National Secondary
Aptitude Test (NSAT), formerly the National College Entrance Examination (NCEE), given by
the Department of Education (DepEd), and in the Civil Service Commission (CSC) Licensure
Examinations and other examinations given by the Professional Regulatory Commission (PRC),
wherein the answer sheet is composed of ovals and the oval corresponding to the chosen answer
would be shaded by the examinee. The Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) for its
Lotto system, wherein the ovals, corresponding to the numbers being bet upon, are also shaded,
employs a similar system. In all these, the answer sheets and the lotto cards are read, or counted,
by the OMR. Because of its familiarity, and because it makes use of ballots which is what most
Filipinos are familiar to, this system was recommended as the most suitable for the Philippine
setting.
!
(
- The Malacañang's Department of Budget and Management produce the P11.9 billion
supplemental budget for this coming election which will be automated.
#
( 1 2
" Since January 2010 there have been reports of signal jammers imported from other
countries with the purpose of messing with the automated election. Using high-tech
means for the election process, its adversaries and those politicians who want to play
dirty also make use of high-tech means for their schemes. Known in the whole world is
the love bug virus created by a computer science student from the Philippines which
destroyed even the most technologically advanced security system of the Pentagon.
Furthermore available in the internet are various hackers whom these politicians would
want to use.
%
- Long is the line of various plots and schemes to employ electoral fraud and one of these
is power disturbances or black-outs. Using machines to count, those who play dirty are
afraid they might not be able to do their usual way of cheating. Those people may want to
revert back to the old system of counting because this is more prone for electoral frauds.
Being machines they use electricity to work. If there is no electricity, there is no
automated election; if there is no automated election, manual election will be applied; and
if manual election will be applied cheating is easier to be accomplished.
Inevitably, Automation Law will change the customary way of conducting elections.
Furthermore, if successfully done on the May 2010 elections, it may reinvent totally the
prominent laws regarding election in the Philippines.
2. Sec. 5 ³
r . - To implement the
AES, each board of canvassers shall be assisted by an information technology-capable
person authorized to operate the equipment adopted for the elections. The Commission
shall deputized information technology personnel from among the agencies and
instrumentalities of the government, including government-owned and controlled
corporations. The of the deputized personnel shall be the same as that of the
members of the board of canvassers."
3. Sec. 7 ³
. - "The automated election system must at least have the
following functional capabilities:
(a) Adequate security against unauthorized access:
(b) Accuracy in recording and reading of votes as well as in the tabulation,
consolidation/canvassing, electronic transmission, and storage of results;
(c) Error recovery in case of non-catastrophic failure of device;
(d) System integrity which ensures physical stability and functioning of the vote
recording and counting process;
(e) Provision for voter verified paper audit trail;
(f) System auditability which provides supporting documentation for verifying the
correctness of reported election results;
(g) An election management system for preparing ballots and programs for use in the
casting and counting of votes and to consolidate, report and display election result in the
shortest time possible;
(h) Accessibility to illiterates and disable voters;
(i) Vote tabulating program for election, referendum or plebiscite;
(j) Accurate ballot counters;
(k) Data retention provision;
(l) Provide for the safekeeping, storing and archiving of physical or paper resource used
in the election process;
(m) Utilize or generate official ballots as herein defined;
(n) Provide the voter a system of verification to find out whether or not the machine has
registered his choice; and
(o) Configure access control for sensitive system data and function.
"In the procurement of this system, the Commission shall develop and adopt an
evaluation system to ascertain that the above minimum system capabilities are met. This
evaluation system shall be developed with the assistance of an advisory council."
4. Sec. 11 ³
. - The AES shall be so designed to include a continuity plan in case
of a systems breakdown or any such eventuality which shall result in the delay,
obstruction or non performance of the electoral process. Activation of such continuity
and contingency measures shall be undertaken in the presence of representatives of political
parties and citizen's arm of the Commission who shall be notified by the election officer
of such activation.
"All political parties and party-lists shall be furnished copies of said continuity plan at
their official addresses as submitted to the Commission. The list shall be published in at
least two newspaper of national of circulation and shall be posted at the website of the
Commission at least fifteen (15) days prior to the electoral activity concerned."
6. Sec. 28 ³
. - The following shall be penalized as provided in this
Act, whether or not said acts affect the electoral process or results:
"(a) Utilizing without authorization, tampering with, damaging, destroying or stealing:
xxx
"(2) Electronic devices or their components, peripherals or supplies used in the
AES such as counting machine, memory pack/diskette, memory pack receiver and
computer set;
"(b) Interfering with, impeding, absconding for purpose of gain, preventing the
installation or use of computer counting devices and the processing, storage, generation
and transmission of election results, data or information;
"(c) Gaining or causing access to using, altering, destroying or disclosing any computer
data, program, system software, network, or any computer-related devices, facilities,
hardware or equipment, whether classified or declassified;
1. Election returns
It is expressly stated in Sec. 18 of R.A. 9369 that that apart from the electronically
stored result, thirty (30) copies of the election return are printed. This modified the six (6)
copies imposed by Sec. 212 of the Omnibus Election Code.
The 30 copies are then distributed to the following:
1. City or municipal board of canvassers
2. The congress, directed to the President of the Senate
3. The Comelec
4. The citizen's arm authorized by the Commission to conduct an unofficial count
5. The dominant majority party as determined by the Commission in accordance with law
6. The dominant minority party as determined by the Commission in accordance with law
7. Deposited inside the compartment of the ballot box for valid ballots
8. The Provincial Board of canvassers
9. The ten (10) accredited major national parties, excluding the dominant majority and
minority parties, in accordance with a voluntary agreement among them. If no such
agreement is reached, the Commission shall decide which parties shall receive the copies
on the basis of the criteria provided in Section 26 of Republic Act No. 7166
10. The two accredited major local parties in accordance with a voluntary agreement
among them.
11. 4 copies to national broadcast or print media entities as may be equitably determined
by the Comelec in view of propagating the copies to the widest extent possible
12. 2 copies local broadcast or print media entities
13. 4 copies to the major citizen's arms, including the accredited citizen's arm, and other
non-partisan groups or organization enlisted by the Comelec pursuant to Section 52(k) of
Batas Pambansa Blg. 881.
After printing of 30 copies additional copies may be printed at the expense of requesting
parties.
2. Certificate of Canvass
According to Sec. 21 of R.A. 9369 number or copies of COC and distribution are as
follows:
& 4 #5 - 466
1. To congress , directed to the president of the Senate for use in the canvass of election
results for president and vice-president
2. The Comelec for use in the canvass of the election results for senators
3. Kept the chairman of the board
4. To the citizens' arm designated by the Commission to conduct an unofficial count. It
shall be the duty of the citizens' arm to furnish independent candidates copies of the
certificate of canvass at the expense of the requesting party.
5. The To Congress, directed to the President of the Senate
6. Posted on a wall within the premises of the canvassing center;
7. Copies for the dominant majority and minority parties;
8. Two accredited major national parties representing the majority and minority,
excluding the dominant majority and minority parties
9. 3 copies to broadcast media entities as may be equitably determined by the Comelec in
view of propagating the copies to the widest extent possible
10 Copy for another citizens' arm or in the absence thereof, to a non-partisan group or
organization enlisted by the Commission pursuant to Section 52(k) of Batas Pambansa
Blg. 881. Such citizens' arm or non-partisan group or organization may use the copy of
election return for the conduct of citizens' quick counts at the local or national levels.
6. Congress as the National Board of Canvassers for the Election of President and Vice President
This is from sec. 37 of R.A. 9369 which amended sec. 30 of R.A. 7166.
Congress and the Commission en banc shall determine the authenticity and due execution
of the certificate of canvas for president and vice - president and senators, respectively, as
accomplished and transmitted to it by the local boards of canvassers, on a showing that:
(1) Each certificate of canvass was executed, signed and thumbmarked by the chairman and
member of the board of canvassers and transmitted or caused to be transmitted to Congress by
them;
(2) Each certificate of canvass contains the names of all of the candidates for president and vice -
president or senator, as the case may be, and their corresponding votes in words and their
corresponding votes in words and in figures;
(3) There exist no discrepancy in other authentic copies of the document such as statement of
votes of any of its supporting document such as statement of votes by city/municipality/by
precinct or discrepancy in the votes of any candidate in words and figures in the certificate; and
(4) There exist no discrepancy in the votes of any candidate in words and figures in the
certificates of canvass against the aggregate number of votes appearing in the election returns of
precincts covered by the certificate of canvass: Provided, That certified print copies of election
returns or certificates of canvass may be used for the purpose of verifying the existence of the
discrepancy.
!
Municipal City
PRECINCT
Canvassing Canvassing
Center Center
Election
Return
Certificate
Certificate
of Canvass
of Canvass After 1 Hour
Proclamation of
Proclamation of
City Winners
Municipal Winners
Proclamation of
District Winners After 1 Hour
After 1 Hour
House of
Representatives
District
After 1 Hour
Provincial Canvassing
Canvassing Center
Center
Proclamation of
Winners for Senate &
Party List Accumulation
of all votes for
President &V.P.
Proclamation of
Winners for
President & Vice
President
$
In comparing the Automation Law with the existing Election Laws and also the Manual
with Automated Election System I found out that because of the automation of election the old
system has drastically changed. Our method of election has seen light of modernization which
has its advantages and problems.
The only problem that I see in automated election is that it has never been done here in
the Philippines. That is why a bunch of sceptics are afraid. If I may also add, some politicians are
also afraid of it, maybe because it is not in their comfort zone of cheating. How can the
Philippines deal with its problem if its leaders are afraid of using means other than their old,
rusting and rotten ideas? As one of the Justices of the Supreme Court had pointed out when faced
with using modern means for better protection of justice ³Why are we afraid to let go and go
down from our dead and lifeless horse when it leads us nowhere but stay at the brink of decay
and stagnation?´
Automation laws have adapted some of the modern means of election. It did not totally
depart from the former procedures and ways of manual election. The only difference is that
machines will count for us. The Comelec employs persons imbued with skills in the computers,
machines and satellite connections. And the time for proclamation of winners is greatly reduced
from an hour to 2 days unlike our former system that can lead to almost 2 months.
As all may see, every government needs laws to give them fangs to bite those who would
mess with the new system. Claws that can scratch the ambitions of those who want to continue
their loathsome way of using the government for their own benefit. Eyes that could foresee the
future needs of our country; and Strength that could protect its people from the ghosts of its past
and the trials of its present times.
The automation law may be the glimmering light we see in this dark and chaotic way of
election in our country. It does not mean that it is the perfect solution but it is the start of a new
journey for the Philippine Elections. If we continue to trail this glimmering light who knows
maybe the door to a new era of election will open and finally put to rest this age old electoral
system teaming with dirty tactics, violence and fraudulent means.
$c -
1.
Auly 22, 2009.
2. Republic Act No. 9369 (Philippine Poll Automation Law).
3. Batas Pambansa Blg. 881 (Omnibus Election Code of the Philippines).
4. 1987 Philippine Constitution.
5.http://philippines.suite101.com/article.cfm/computerized_elections_in_the_philippines#ixzz0f6
gLHEgt
6. http://iskwiki.upd.edu.ph/index.php/Online/Automated_Elections_in_the_Philippines
7. http://hubpages.com/hub/Automated-Election-Are-we-ready
8. http://www.senate.gov.ph/press_release/2006/1108_gordon1.asp
9.http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20090306-192592/All-go-for-
automated-elections-in-2010
10. http://www.smartmatic.com/index.php?id=60&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=40&cHash=cf9595131f
11. http://www.everyjoe.com/thegadgetblog/2010-automated-elections-in-the-philippines/
12.http://www.manilatimes.net/index.php/top-stories/8966-first-big-test-of-2010-automated-
elections
13.http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20100127-249765/Firm-reports-
successful-field-testing-of-poll-machines
14.http://ezinearticles.com/?2010-Automated-Election---A-Vision-of-the-Philippines-Fight-
Against-Corruption&id=3655618
15. http://synthesistblog.com/2010-automated-elections-managing-the-change-171-0/
16. http://www.betterphilippines.com/voters-education/hacking-the-automation-election-system/
17. http://www.botomoto.com/think-about-it/automated-elections-fears/
18. Republic Act 8189 (Voter¶s Registration Act of 1996)
19. Republic Act 9189 (Absentee voting of 2003)
20. Republic Act 6679 of 1989
21. Republic Act 7166, sec. 23, 25
22. Republic Act 6686, sec. 18
23. Republic Act 8173, sec. 27
A Comparative Analysis on Automation Law
V. Conclusion
VI. References