Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
concept
Author(s): Kari Palonen
Source: Max Weber Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1 (JANUARY 2011), pp. 99-117
Published by: Max Weber Studies
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24579978
Accessed: 12-01-2017 12:21 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
Max Weber Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Max Weber
Studies
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
[MWS 11.1 (2011) 99-117]
ISSN 1470-8078
Kari Palonen
Abstract
The article asks in what ways the recent publication of Weber's last, interrupted
lecture series from 1920 contributes to our understanding of his concept of the state?
Whereas Gangolf Hbinger in his preface and editorial remarks of MWG III/7
thematizes the political, intellectual, disciplinary and university historical contexts
of the lectures, I concentrate on Weber's break with the conventions in the German
history of the concept of the state and on his understanding of the statelike all
other orders and powersas a distinct complex of chances. Even more clearly than
elsewhere in his work, Weber's lectures, as revealed in his students' notes, oppose
every version of the state as a collective subject or substance. As the notes of Hans
Ficker put it, the distinctiveness of a state lies in 'Gehorsamschance': insofar as there
exists a chance to obey, a state does exist. Such a concept of state is not a sovereign but
a fragile and temporal entity, and competing regimes can claim the title of the state.
A short comparison of the Weberian concept is made with three expert authors on the
state, namely Carl Schmitt, Hannah Arendt and Quentin Skinner. Both the venera
tion and the demonization of the state have lost ground, and Weber's neutralisation
of the concept has the advantage of not moralizing over the political conflicts around
the state by moving those conflicts from the terms of good and evil to ones of judging
the openings and closures in the range of possibilities of state-bound politics.
Keywords: state, chance, obedience, Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, Hannah Arendt,
Quentin Skinner.
) Max Weber Studies 2011, Clifton House, 17 Malvern Road, London, E8 3LP.
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
100 Max Weber Studies
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Palonen The State as a 'Chance' Concept 101
German use of the concept 'Staat' after the French Revolution. His
key thesis operates with the metaphor of an hourglass that gives to
the specific history of the concept of the state a profile both similar
to and different from other key concepts revised in the context of
what Koselleck famously calls the 'Sattelzeit' ('time of conceptual
transformation'). 'Der Staat' also becomes a collective singular, that
is, it subsumes its previously separate aspects under a more abstract
concept, 'the state as such', around 1800.1 Koselleck's point lies spe
cifically, however, in the thesis that after this phase of abstraction
the narrow neck of the hourglassthe horizon of meanings again
begins to expand, although now within the conceptual horizon of
the new collective singular.2
Max Weber equally wants to purge the concepts from its feudal
elements. Apart from this his concept of the state has hardly any
thing in common with the modes of conceptualising the state seen in
academic 'Staatslehre' or in the daily political uses of the concept in
nineteenth-century Germany. Consequently, the authors of 'Staat und
Souvernitt' only mention Weber's concept of Machtstaat as he used
it in his 1916 article 'Deutschland unter europischen Weltmchten'
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
102 Max Weber Studies
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Palonen The State as a 'Chance' Concept 103
The point of this passage is that the state cannot be formed inde
pendently of the actual beliefs of historical persons, but only in a
synthesising relationship with them. The nominalistic conceptuali
sation of the state that Weber presents in nuce in the quoted passage
marks a real disenchantment with the German nineteenth-century
concept of the state. For Weber, the other alternative to the subject
concept, namely Kelsen's legalistic formalism, which identifies the
state with the legal order (1911), follows the positivistic German
tradition of state thinking that disconnects the concept from action
and politics altogether.
In the quoted passage, the concept of 'Chance' is not mentioned.
Its presence is, nonetheless, evident in Weber's theory of action,
constructed in the first pages of his 'Objectivity' essay. As is well
known, 'Chancen' and 'Nebenfolgen' are the two key concepts
through which Weber transcends the merely normative and teleo
logical approach of ends and means (see Weber 1904, GAW: 149-50).
He, furthermore, thematizes the contingency of the past through
'objective possibilities', another key topic of the essays (Weber
1904:179,192,194) and even more in his defence of unrealised past
possible where in his 'Kritische Studien' he opposed the views of
Eduard Meyer (Weber 1906).
In other words, for Weber the concept of 'Chance' and 'Han
deln' are interconnected: we cannot speak of actions in cases where
there is no chance to act differently (see Palonen 1998:133-42). Of
course, Weber's concept of 'Chance' has nothing to do with posi
tive and optimistic analysis of the situation but is purely formal:
there is always a chance to act differently with regard to modes of
encountering death or catastrophe. The concept of 'Chance' is the
most powerful sign of the radical contingency that shapes the entire
thought of Weber.
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
104 Max Weber Studies
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Palonen The State as a 'Ounce' Concept 105
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
106 Max Weber Studies
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Palonen The State as a 'Chance' Concept 107
The notes of Hans Ficker give the same topic this formulation:
Soziologisch: woran denkt der Mensch bei 'Staat'? Immer nur Chancen
einer bestimmten Art von Handlungen: Staat. An ihnen orientiert man
sein Handeln. Soziologie: Wissenschaft vom Handeln. Existenz des
Staates: Gehorsamschance. Widersprechende Normen tun dem Sozi
ologen nichts. Soziologischer Rechtsbegriff: Vorstellung in den Kpfen
des Publikums, das es fr legitim hlt. Soziologischer Staatsbegriff
(Weber 2009: 69).
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
108 Max Weber Studies
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Palonen The State as a 'Chance' Concept 109
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
110 Max Weber Studies
With such an attitude Weber could not find any friends among the
revolutionaries of the Rterepublik, including his one-time student
Ernst Toller. Someone else who attended his lectures and participated
in his 'Dozentenseminar' was from the opposite political spectrum,
namely Carl Schmitt (see Hbinger 2009a: 50). The effect of Weber's
lectures on him, with their demystifying of the concept of the state
into a complex of chances and its severing the link between the
state and sovereignty, may perhaps be seen as one impulse behind
Schmitt's militant defence of sovereignty in Die Diktatur (1921) and
Politische Theologie (1922). As is well known, Schmitt's point was to
rescue state sovereignty by connecting it to two other concepts: dic
tatorship and state of exception ('Ausnahmezustand').
In these books, Schmitt never mentions Weber as the target of his
polemics, and we may ask to what extent he understood his books
as such. (Parts of Politische Theologie were included in the Gedcht
nisschrift to Weber). More than ten years later, however, Schmitt's
Legalitt und Legitimitt entered into a polemic against Weber's con
cept of 'Chance'. His subtitle Legalitt und gleiche Chance politischer
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Palonen The State as a 'Chance' Concept 111
The word chance remains untranslated here [KP: from the French], It
belongs particularly to the way of thought and speech of a liberal era
of free competition and of expectation, and it concerns the mixture
of fortunate occurrence and conformity with law, freedom and calcu
lability, arbitrariness and culpability, that is characteristic of this era.
Other such words are, for example, ideology, risk, and, moreover, the
'obligation' with its collective 'implications', as well as all the possi
ble types of 'validity'. Such words are better left unchanged, so that
the mark of their intellectual origin remains visible. 'Chance' occurs
frequently in Max Weber7s sociology (Schmitt 2004:135-36).
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
112 Max Weber Studies
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Palonen The State as a 'Chance' Concept 113
Concluding points
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
114 Max Weber Studies
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Palonen The State as a 'Chance' Concept 115
References
Arendt, Hannah
1964/2003 'Personal Responsibility under Dictatorship', Responsibility and Judg
ment (ed. Jerome Kohn; New York: Schocken): 19-48.
1972 Crises of the Republic (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
Hiller, Kurt
1981 Pazifismus der Tat-Revolutionrer Pazifismus (Berlin: Ahde).
Hbinger, Gangolf
2009a 'Editorischer Bericht', va Allgemeine Staatslehre und Politik. Mit-und Nach
schriften 1920. Max-Weber-Gesamtausgabe 111/7 (Tbingen: Mohr): 43
62.
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
116 Max Weber Studies
Michels, Robert
1910/1970 Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der
Krner).
Palonen, Kari
1998 Das 'Webersche Moment'. Zur Kontingenz des Politischen (Wiesbaden:
Westdeutscher Verlag).
2003 'Die Verzeitlichung der Begriffe bei Max Weber', in Jussi Kurunmki
and Kari Palonen (eds.), Zeit, Geschichte und Politik/Time, History
and Politics (Jyvskyl Studies in Education, Psychology and Social
Research): 85-104.
2008a 'Imagining Max Weber's Reply to Hannah Arendt: Remarks on the
Arendtian Critique of Representative Democracy', Constellations 15:
56-71.
2008b The Politics of Limited Times. The rhetoric of temporal judgment in parlia
mentary democracies (Baden-Baden: Nomos).
2010a 'Max Weber's Rhetoric of "Objectivity" ', Max Weber Studies 10.1:
71-93.
2010b 'Objektivitt' als faires Spiel. Wissenschaft als Politik bei Max Weber
(Baden-Baden: Nomos).
Revolution, Rtegremien und Rterepublik in Bayern 1918/19. http://
www.bayerische-landesbibliothek-online.de/bayernl918
Schmitt, Carl
1921/1978 Die Diktatur (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).
1922/1979 Politische Theologie (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).
1932/1980 Legalitt und Legitimitt (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).
2004 Legality and Legitimacy (trans. Jeffrey Seitzer; Durham: Duke Univer
sity Press).
Skinner, Quentin
1996 Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy ofHobbes (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press).
1999 'Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State', Journal of Politi
cal Philosophy 7:1-29.
2009 'A Genealogy of the Modern State', Proceedings of the British Academy
162:325-70.
Weber, Max
1904/1973 'Die "Objektivitt" sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer
Erkenntnis', Gesammelte Aufstze zur Wissenschaftslehre (Tbingen:
Mohr): 146-214.
1906/1973 'Kritische Studien auf dem Gebiet der kulturwissenschftlichen Logik',
Gesammelte Aufstze zur Wissenschaftslehre (Tbingen: Mohr): 215-90.
1910/1978 'Antikritisches zum "Geist" des Kapitalismus', in Protestantische Ethik,
II (ed. J. Winckelmann; Gtersloh: Siebenstern): 149-87.
1913/1973 'ber einige Kategorien der verstehenden Soziologie', Gesammelte
Aufstze Zur Wissenschaftslehre (Tbingen: Mohr): 427-74.
1917/1973 'Der Sinn der "Wertfreiheit" der soziologischen und konomischen
Wissenschaften', Gesammelte Aufstze zur Wissenschaftslehre (Tbingen:
Mohr): 489-540.
1918/1988 'Parlament und Regierung im neugeordneten Deutschland', Max
Weber-Studienausgabe 1/15 (Tbingen: Mohr): 202-302.
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Palonen The State as a 'Chance' Concept 117
This content downloaded from 132.236.27.217 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:21:47 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms