Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

The international criminal courts first war crimes trial for destruction of

cultural monuments opens this week against a jihadi leader accused of


demolishing ancient mausoleums in Timbuktu.

Ahmad al-Faqi al-Mahdi is accused of levelling medieval shrines, tombs of


Sufi saints and a mosque dating back to the 15th century that formed part of
the Unesco world heritage site in the northern Malian city.

The decision by the courts chief prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, to make


obliteration of heritage a priority in dealing with the aftermath of Malis
conflict may prove controversial in Africa but is likely to boost the ICCs
international profile.

Since Balkan warlords were charged by the international criminal tribunal


for the former Yugoslavia with shelling Dubrovnik, wrecking the ancient
bridge at Mostar and damaging the national library in Sarajevo in the early
1990s, those responsible for eradicating historical sites have largely escaped
punishment.
Destruction of cultural heritage is not a second-rate crime. Its part of an atrocity to erase a people
Mark Ellis, International Bar Association

No Taliban or al-Qaida leader was charged with the destruction of


Afghanistans sixth-century Bamiyan Buddhas, which were dynamited in
2001. Khmer Rouge genocide trials did not deal with the looting of
Cambodias Hindu temples. Nor have Islamic State leaders been indicted
for destroying Assyrian statues from Nineveh or razing Roman ruins in
Palmyra.

The damage inflicted on Timbuktu, known as the city of 333 saints,


followed the rebellion of al-Qaida-inspired Tuareg militias, armed with
weapons from Libya, in the central African state in 2012.

Faqi, a local ethnic Tuareg, is said to have been a member of Ansar Dine
and the head of Hesbah, known as the Manners Brigade, which considered
the mausoleums built to pay homage to deceased saints to be
blasphemous.

Advertisement

He is accused of directing attacks on 10 ancient mud-brick buildings in


June 2012 and July 2012. One of the desecrated sites was the Sidi Yahya
mosque, built in 1440 when Timbuktu was a regional centre for learning. It
contained Prof Sidi Yahyas mausoleum.

Around 4,000 ancient manuscripts were also lost, stolen or burned during
the Islamists reign of terror. Ansar Dine was pushed out of Timbuktu in
2013 when French forces intervened. Faqi was arrested in neighbouring
Niger and sent to the Netherlands last September.

At his first remand appearance, Faqi said: I am from the Tuareg tribe. I
was born about 40 years ago. I am a graduate of the teachers institute in
Timbuktu and I was a civil servant in the education department
beginning in 2011.

He told judges that he wished to be addressed in Arabic and referred to by


his full name. The confirmation-of-charges hearing opening the trial on
Tuesday 1 March will be held in the ICCs new court in The Hague.

There is growing resentment among African states that the UN-backed ICC
has concentrated its prosecutions on the continent a development that is
partially a consequence of the United States, Russia and most of the Middle
East failing to join the court. The ruling ANC party in South Africa has voted
to leave the ICC.

Faqi is the first person the ICC has put on trial for the Mali conflict. There
has been criticism that no major figure in the Tuareg uprising has been
charged.

Mark Ellis, chief executive of the International Bar Association, who


specialises in war crimes cases, said: Politically, there will be those who
will question why Bensouda is focusing on ancient sites rather than going
after rape, torture and murder convictions, but destruction of cultural
heritage is not a second-rate crime. Its part of an atrocity to erase a people.
I hope it will act as a deterrent to similar acts in other countries.

The Open Society Justice Initiative in New York said there had been a
previous case brought by the ICC for destroying buildings following the
conflict in the Congo. Bosco Ntaganda, the former Congolese militia leader,
was charged with destroying a church and a hospital, along with more
serious crimes.

Advertisement

But this is the first time this has been the main charge against a suspect, or
when the property destroyed has had global cultural significance, said
Jonathan Birchall, of the initiative. Al-Faqi is also the first member of an
Islamist armed group to appear before the court.

Legal authority for monument destruction prosecutions derives from a 1954


convention written in the aftermath of the second world war.

Although the 1938 Nazi-organised vandalism of Kristallnacht targeting


synagogues and Jewish property across Germany did feature in the
Nuremberg war crimes trials, none of the defendants were specifically
charged with cultural destruction.

The convention covers architectural monuments, archaeological sites,


works of art, manuscripts, books, other cultural objects and scientific
collections. It has been ratified by more than 125 states.

Welcoming Faqis transfer to The Hague last September, the chief


prosecutor Bensouda said the people of Mali deserve justice for the attacks
against their cities, their beliefs and their communities.

The charges we have brought against Ahmad al-Faqi al-Mahdi involve


most serious crimes, she said. They are about the destruction of
irreplaceable historic monuments, and they are about a callous assault on
the dignity and identity of entire populations, and their religious and
historical roots.

More than 350,00 people were displaced by the conflict. Unesco has
alreadyrebuilt many of the mausoleums that were destroyed in Timbuktu.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen