Sie sind auf Seite 1von 13

979

Thoracic Kyphosis: Range in


Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 36.84.225.167 on 11/28/17 from IP address 36.84.225.167. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Normal Subjects

Gerald T. Fon1 ‘ 2 Thoracic kyphosis was measured on chest radiognaphs of 31 6 “normal” subjects by
Michael J. Pitt1 means of a modification of the Cobb technique for measuring scoliosis. Patients were
A. Cole Thies Jr.3 accepted as “normal” if they had
no thoracic or spinal complaints or radiographic
abnormalities in the chest including
the thoracic spine. A total of 1 59 male and 157
female subjects 2-77 years old was studied. The relation among age, gender, and
kyphosis were determined using least squares fits of first-order linear mathematical
models. These results were also used to determine the expected ranges of kyphosis
for a “normal” patient of a given age and gender. The degree of kyphosis increased
with age and the rate of increase was higher in females than in males. Clinical
explanations for this differential increase are discussed.

Exaggeration of the normal thoracic curvature is associated with a variety of


conditions, such as Scheuerrnann disease, congenital spinal anomalies, and
paralytic and metabolic processes, as well as inflammatory or traumatic condi-
tions [1 An increased
]. incidence of spinal curvature in patients with cystic
fibrosis was recently reported [2]. Severe thoracic kyphotic curves may result in
pain, cardiopulmonary failure, and even paraplegia, in addition to cosmetic
deformities.
Some degree of thoracic convexity in the saggital plane is normally present
and a range of 20#{176}-40#{176}
has been suggested from limited studies [3-5]. While
there has been extensive research on the treatment and prevention of spinal
curvatures, we could find no studies specifically on the normal range of thoracic
kyphosis, although ranges are assumed in published studies for other purposes
[4-6]. The purpose of our study was to determine the expected range of thoracic
kyphosis in a group of patients of varying age and gender as seen on routine
chest radiographs.

Received June 1 2, 1 979; accepted after revi-


sion December 1 8, 1979.
. . Materials and Methods
, Department of Radiology, University of An-
zona, Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ 85724. Chest radiographs of 450 patients examined at the University of Arizona Health Sciences
Address reprint requests to M. J. Pitt. ‘ .

Center in Tucson from 1 976 to 1 978 were selected. These radiographs had bean inter-
2 Present address: Department of Radiological pretad as normal by a radiologist at the time of the examination and were classified
Sciences, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, . ‘ ‘ ‘

CA 90024. according to the American College of Radiology index [7]. The patient identification
. . . numbers and the code for a normal chest examination had been stored on microfiche. From
3 Division of Computer Systems and Biostatis- . .

tics, University of Arizona, Health Sciences Cen- this file 1 50 cases/year for the years 1 976-1 978 were sampled with about equal numbers
ten, Tucson, AZ 85724. for each age group and gender.
AJR 134:979-983, May 1980 Even though the chest radiographs had been classified as normal, they were reviewed
0361-803X/80/1345-0979 $00.00 again by the senior author (G.T.F.). Hence the films ware evaluated by two radiologists
© American Roentgen Ray Society over a 1 -3 year period. Of the 450 patients sampled, only 31 6 were selected for the study.
980 FON ET AL. AJR:134, May 1980

These mat the two important criteria of: (1 ) no abnormality of heart,


lungs, or thoracic skeleton and (2) proper positioning and suitable
radiographic technique.
For study purposes, patients were accepted as ‘ ‘normal’ ‘ if no
thoracic or spinal complaints were noted in the request for radio-
logic examination and no radiologic abnormalities in the chest
including the thoracic spine were identified. Medical charts were
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 36.84.225.167 on 11/28/17 from IP address 36.84.225.167. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

not reviewed. All patients were ambulatory. Most ofthe radiographs


selected were of patients who had the examination as a preoperative
routine for elective surgery or preemployment. While the general
health status of some of these patients was not optimal, it was
assumed that the patients were sufficiently fit to be amublatory and
to meet the other criteria required for positioning as described
below.
During the second review of the radiographs by the senior author,
changes in the lungs or thoracic spine that could be considered
normal in the initial interpretation but might affect the thoracic
kyphotic curve were specifically sought. Changes that increase the
curvature of the spine include atelectasis, hyperaeration, or air-
trapping. Bony changes such as pectus excavatum, spinal deform-
ities, Schauermann disease, and scoliosis of the spine were ax-
cluded. It is well known that the musculature may be affected by
systemic diseases with resultant effect on spinal curve. By exclud-
ing the radiographs that showed any scoliosis patients with signifi-
cantly weak musculature were presumably excluded because it Fig. 1 -Method of measuring kyphosis.
would be very unusual for poor muscular support to affect the
kyphotic curve only without associated scoliosis.
The recognition of osteoporosis or loss of mineral content of ment error. Another source of error is the patient’s positioning at
bones especially in the milder forms from simple films is notably the time the radiographs were taken. A prospective study would be
difficult. However, by excluding any patients with secondary necessary to control this more completely than in this study.
changes in the spine resulting from demineralization, the effect of Statistical analysis. Whether a relation existed between age of
the loss of mineral content on spinal curvature would be reduced to patient and degree of kyphosis was determined by testing the
a minimum. Such secondary changes as biconcave depressions of statistical significance of the slope of a straight line (i.e., first-order
the vertebral end plates resulting in ‘ ‘fish vertebrae,’ ‘ vertebral linear) model fitted separately for males and females by linear
collapse, and significant vertebral wedging were reasons for exclu- regression. The adequacy of each straight line model was deter-
sion. For those patients over 50, mild degenerative changes in the mined by visual inspection of fits and by statistical tests. The
spine consisting of minor marginal osteophytes ware accepted as difference of slopes between males and females was also tested,
normal. For all selected patients these changes were not mentioned using an analysis of covarianca procedure. Confidence regions for
in the initial report and presumably were considered to be within kyphosis based on age and gender were then determined, using
the norm. the linear regressions [9]. Finally, a descriptive analysis of kyphosis
It is obvious that the degree of kyphosis is related to patient by age and gender was performed, computing means and standard
positioning. To minimize positioning variations, the radiographs deviations for each age-gender group. The results of the descriptive
included in this study met the following criteria: (1 ) they were made analysis were used to further investigate the adequacy of the first-
with the patient standing and with a focal-film distance of 1 .8 m; (2) order linear model.
the patient’s r.rms were above the shoulders in the lateral view, with
neither humerus below the horizontal position (this would help
reduce any increase in the thoracic curve due to positioning); and Results
(3) patients under 3 years of age were excluded since most of these
The composition of the patient population according to
patients were supine or strapped to the Brat Board (the only
age and gender is shown in table 1 . Linear regression of
exception was a 2-year-old whose radiograph was made erect).
The degree of kyphosis was measured by a modification of the kyphosis on age for both males and females resulted in an
Cobb technique [8] as used for scoliosis. The upper and lower adequate fit in the age range 6-75 years and a poor fit in
vertebral bodies defining the curve were selected and lines were the range 0-3 years. Only at age 6 and over did each model
drawn, extending along the superior border of the upper end indicate an equal likelihood of over- or underprediction of
vertebra as well as along the inferior border of the lower end kyphosis. For this reason, further regression analysis was
vertebra. Perpendiculars were drawn from these two lines and the limited to the age range of 6-75 years for males and
angle was measured at the intersection (fig. 1 ). An angle rule was females.
used to draw the perpendiculars and measure the angles. The Results of that analysis are shown in figures 2 and 3. In
measurements were done on one set of films per patient and in
each figure, the middle line represents the predicted value
most cases that was the only available set to fall within our definition
of kyphosis, and the outer lines delineate a 95% confidence
of normal. For each patient, one measurement of the thoracic
region for an observation of kyphosis for a patient of a given
kyphotic curve was made. To test measurement error, a sample of
30 cases out of the 31 6 was drawn, and the cases remeasured. age (parameters of both models are shown in table 2). For
The maximum difference between first and second readings was both males and females the slopes of these lines were
50, It should be noted that this is only one aspect of total measure- significantly different from zero (p < 0.01 ) indicating that
AJR:134, May 1980 THORACIC KYPHOSIS 981

TABLE 1 : Distribution of Patients by Age and Gender

Male Female Totals


Age (years)
No. Patients Mean Age No. Patients Mean Age No. Patients Mean Age

2-9 . . . 26 5.62 23 5.43 49 5.53


10-19 . . . 28 14.21 22 14.73 50 14.44
20-29 37 24.62 24 24.25 61 24.48
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 36.84.225.167 on 11/28/17 from IP address 36.84.225.167. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

30-39 . . . . . 26 33.28 26 35.23 52 34.31


40-49 . 20 43.55 32 43.75 52 43.67
50-59 . . 10 53.20 17 54.41 27 53.96
60-69 . . . 9 63.33 7 65.29 16 64.19
70-79 . . 3 74.00 6 72.17 9 72.78
Totals . 1 59 28.42 1 57 32.88 31 6 30.63

kyphosis was related to the age of the patient. The ability of 60r
age to predict kyphosis is indicated by two measures in
table 2, standard error of the estimate and r2. Standard error 50
of the estimate is a measure of the model’s average mac-
curacy of prediction. The percentage of overall variation of a)
kyphosis explained by the model is measured by r2 (the
square
Analysis
and predicted
or overprediction
Parameters
of the product-moment
of residual values
kyphosis)
across
of the straight
the entire
line
correlation
(difference
indicated equal
age
models
coefficient
between observed
likelihood
ranges.
are
r).

shown
of under-

in table
I
2. Analysis of covariance indicated that females showed a
statistically significantly greater slope (parameter b in table
2) than males (p < 0.05). 0 10 20 30 40 5060 70 80

Descriptive profiles of kyphosis are shown in tables 3 and


4 (these tables include patients of ages 3-5 years, who Age (Years)
were not included in the linear regression models). The
Fig. 2.-Linear regression of kyphosis on age, including prediction and
adequacy of the linear model can be further investigated by
comparing: (1 ) the male-female differences at each age 95% confidence regions, for male patients. (See text.)
range and (2) the patterns of standard deviation across age
groups. The latter comparison indicates no immediate pat-
tern for females, but there exists a suggestive decrease in
standard deviation of kyphosis as age increases for male
patients. This decrease suggests that confidence bounds in
figure 2 may be slightly too wide for older patients and
slightly too narrow for younger patients. The former corn-
parison is depicted in figure 4, where mean kyphosis for
each age group is plotted against mean age within each age
group for males and females. An unpaired t test of differ-
ences between group means (males versus females) is
performed at each age group and the results of each test
displayed as significance (p)levels in figure 4. An interesting
result of this analysis is the similarity of males and females
until about age 40, after which females exhibit significantly
higher kyphosis for each group (the highest age group, 70-
Age (Years)
79 years, included a very small number of cases and did
not indicate statistical significance). These results may in- Fig. 3.-Linear regression of kyphosis on age, including prediction and
dicate a subtle departure from the straight line model for 95% confidence regions, for female patients. (See text.)

female patients that is not immediately apparent in figure 3.

kyphosis increases with age and the rate of increase is


Discussion
higher in females than in males; this appears to be more
This study shows that the normal range of kyphosis is obvious after age 40. In a limited study of a group of patients
related to both age and gender of a patient. The degree of 60-79 years old, Cowan [1 0] also found an increase in the
982 FON ET AL. AJR:134, May 1980

TABLE 2: Parameters of Least Squares Fit For Mathematical


Models of Form Kyphosis = b (age) + a TABLE 4: Degree of Kyphosis in Females By Age

Gender No Cases b a SE r r Kypho sis ()


No
Age (years) Cases
Male 147 0.204 21.8 7.6 0.41 0.17 Mean SD Minimum Maximum
Female 148 0.345 19.2 7.9 0.62 0.38
2-9 23 23.87 6.67 8 36
22 26.00 7.43 11 41
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 36.84.225.167 on 11/28/17 from IP address 36.84.225.167. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

10-19 .

20-29 24 26.83 7.98 7 40


30-39 26 28.42 8.63 10 42
TABLE 3: Degree of Kyphosis in Males By Age 40-49 32 32.66 6.72 21 50
50-59 17 40.71 9.88 22 53
No Kyphosis (1
60-69 7 44.86 7.80 34 54
Age (years)
Cases . .
Maximum
. 70-79 6 41.67 9.00 30 56
Mean SD Minimum

2-9 26 20.88 7.85 5 40


10-19 28 25.11 8.16 8 39
20-29 37 26.27 8.12 13 48
49 60
30-39 26 29.04 7.93 13
40-49 20 29.75 6.93 17 44
50-59 10 33.00 6.46 25 45 50
60-69 9 34.67 5.12 25 62 .. . females
70-79 3 40.67 7.57 32 66

kyphotic
method
angle
for measurement.
with age, even though he used a different :
a
: pP.16 p.69 P-.79 p.79 pa.05 p.04 p.OO7
males

The increase in the kyphotic curve with age is not unex-


10
pected, because of the associated changes in the soft
tissues and mineral content of the bones with the progres-
sion of years. An association of progressive increase in 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
spinal curvatures with gradual compression wedging of the
vertebrae and its narrowing of the intervertebral discs have Mean Age (Years)

been described [1 1 , 1 2]. The difference in the rate of


Fig. 4.-Mean kyphosis for males and females by 1 0-year age intervals,
increase in the degree of kyphosis between genders in the (See text.)
older age groups is interesting. It is significant in that the
higher rate of increase in kyphosis females as shown in this
study where the measurements were done on radiographs
is in agreement with the findings of Milne and Lander [13] abnormals’ ‘ in the older age groups. As is the case for any
who used a surveyor’s flexicurve and did the measurements sample of patients from one location the results of this study
on the subjects themselves. They used an entirely different cannot be strictly applied to the ‘ ‘general population.’ ‘ How-
method and the kyphosis was measured indirectly by cal- ever, in the absence of any control study where the sample
culation of an ‘ ‘ index of kyphosis. ‘ ‘ These authors later is a true random sample from the ‘ ‘general population,”
showed that the difference in kyphosis between the two these results should serve as useful guidelines for prediction
genders in the older population was not due to a difference of normal thoracic kyphosis.
in the degree of wedging in the vertebral bodies as one
might expect [1 4]. There were other variables related to age
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
that were contributory to the thoracic kyphosis in females.
They postulated the possibility of poor posture and aging of We thank Janet Quinones for manuscript preparation.
soft tissues with resultant loss of muscle tone leading to
increased kyphosis in older females. It is also reasonable to
REFERENCES
postulate that the relative physical inactivity in females,
probably related to occupation, may decrease the tone on 1 . Keim H. Kyphosis and lordosis in the adolescent spine. New
the spinal ligaments and muscles. The dependent breasts York: Grune & Stratton, 1976:193-209
may further accentuate the kyphotic curve in these older 2. Erikkila JC, Warwick WJ, Bradford DS. Spinal deformities and
females. cystic fibrosis. Clin Orthop 1978;1 31 :146-150
3. Bosekar EH. The determination of the normal thoracic ky-
The association of kyphosis with age and gender darn-
phosis; a roentgenographic study of the spines of 1 21 “nor-
onstrated in our study clearly shows that the range of 20#{176}-
mal’ ‘ children. Presented at Gillete Children’s Hospital, St.
40#{176}
that has been reported [1 , 2, 6] as a reasonable normal
Paul, Minn., 1958
range for thoracic kyphosis is inadequate because this 4. Bradford DC, Moe JH, Winter AR. Kyphosis and postural
range of values in our population would have resulted in roundback deformity in children and adolescents. Minn Med
‘ ‘false normals’ ‘ in the younger age groups and ‘ ‘false 1973;56:1 14-1 20
AJR:124, May 1980 THORACIC KYPHOSIS 983

5. Roaf A. Vertebral growth and its mechanical control. J Bone 1 0. Cowan NA. The frontal cardiac silhouette in older people. Br
Joint Surg (Br] 1 960;42 : 40-59 HeartJ 1965;27:231 -235
6. Bradford D. Editorial comment-kyphosis. Clin Orthop 1 1 . Nicholas JA, Wilson PD. Osteoporosis of the aged spine. Clin
1977;1 28:2-4 Orthop 1 963;26 :19-33
7. American College of Radiology. Index for roentgen diagnoses, 1 2. Rowe CA, Sorbie C. Fractures of the spine in the aged. Clin
3d ad. Baltimore: Waverly, 1975 Orthop I 963;26 : 34-39
8. Cobb AJ. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop 1 3. Milne JS, Lander lJ. Age affects in kyphosis and lordosis in
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 36.84.225.167 on 11/28/17 from IP address 36.84.225.167. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Surg 1948;5:261 -275 adults. Ann Hum BioI 1974;1 :327-337


9. Draper N, Smith H. Applied regression analysis. New York: 14. Milna JS, Lander IJ. The relationship of kyphosis to the shape
Wiley, 1966:23-24 of vertebral bodies. Ann Hum Biol 1976;3: 173-179
This article has been cited by:

1. Peter R. Loughenbury, Athanasios I. Tsirikos. 2017. Scheuermann's kyphosis: diagnosis, presentation and treatment. Orthopaedics
and Trauma 31:6, 388-394. [Crossref]
2. Eva Barrett, Brian Lenehan, Kieran O’sullivan, Jeremy Lewis, Karen McCreesh. 2017. Validation of the manual inclinometer and
flexicurve for the measurement of thoracic kyphosis. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 176, 1-8. [Crossref]
3. Omid Torkaman, Mojtaba Kamyab, Taher Babayi, Hasan Ghandhari. 2017. Effect of New Kypho-Remainder Orthosis on Curve
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 36.84.225.167 on 11/28/17 from IP address 36.84.225.167. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Intensity in Adults With Postural Hyper Kyphosis. Journal of Rehabilitation 18:3, 212-219. [Crossref]
4. Laurie Devaney, Richard Bohannon, Jon Rizzo, Maryclaire Capetta, Jeremy Vigneault, Katherine Van Deveire. 2017. Inclinometric
measurement of kyphotic curvature: Description and clinimetric properties. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 33:10, 797-804.
[Crossref]
5. Amanda L. Lorbergs, Joanne M. Murabito, Mohamed Jarraya, Ali Guermazi, Brett T. Allaire, Laiji Yang, Douglas P. Kiel,
L. Adrienne Cupples, Mary L. Bouxsein, Thomas G. Travison, Elizabeth J. Samelson. 2017. Thoracic Kyphosis and Physical
Function: The Framingham Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 65:10, 2257-2264. [Crossref]
6. Riikka E. Mäkitie, Tuukka Niinimäki, Miika T. Nieminen, Camilla Schalin-Jäntti, Jaakko Niinimäki, Outi Mäkitie. 2017.
Impaired WNT signaling and the spine—Heterozygous WNT1 mutation causes severe age-related spinal pathology. Bone 101,
3-9. [Crossref]
7. Tayebeh Roghani, Minoo Khalkhali Zavieh, Farideh Dehghan Manshadi, Nicole King, Wendy Katzman. 2017. Age-related
hyperkyphosis: update of its potential causes and clinical impacts—narrative review. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
29:4, 567-577. [Crossref]
8. Moreno D'Amico, Edyta Kinel, Piero Roncoletta. 2017. Normative 3D opto-electronic stereo-photogrammetric posture and spine
morphology data in young healthy adult population. PLOS ONE 12:6, e0179619. [Crossref]
9. Yoshiki Asai, Shunji Tsutsui, Hiroyuki Oka, Noriko Yoshimura, Hiroshi Hashizume, Hiroshi Yamada, Toru Akune, Shigeyuki
Muraki, Ko Matsudaira, Hiroshi Kawaguchi, Kozo Nakamura, Sakae Tanaka, Munehito Yoshida. 2017. Sagittal spino-pelvic
alignment in adults: The Wakayama Spine Study. PLOS ONE 12:6, e0178697. [Crossref]
10. Seil Sohn, Chun Kee Chung, Yongjung Jay Kim, Inbo Han, Su Min Kang, Ji Won Yoon, Hyejin Kim. 2017. Sagittal spinal
alignment in asymptomatic patients over 30 years old in the Korean population. Acta Neurochirurgica 159:6, 1119-1128. [Crossref]
11. Sunjin Jung, Seokpyo Hong, Kyungmin Cho, Haegwang Eom, Byungkuk Choi, Junyong Noh. 2017. Age-related gait motion
transformation based on biomechanical observations. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 28:3-4, e1774. [Crossref]
12. Audrey Angelliaume, Anne-Laure Simon, Louis Boissière, Aurore Bouty, Jérôme Sales de Gauzy, Jean-Marc Vital, Olivier Gille,
Clément Tournier, Stéphane Aunoble, Jean-Roger Pontailler, Yan Lefèvre. 2017. Conservative treatment of pediatric thoracic and
lumbar spinal fractures. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B 26:1, 73-79. [Crossref]
13. Eiji Itoi, Yu Mori. Posture Analysis in Patients with Spinal Osteoporosis 31-43. [Crossref]
14. Miles O. Fortner, Paul A. Oakley, Deed E. Harrison. 2017. Treating ‘slouchy’ (hyperkyphosis) posture with chiropractic
biophysics®: a case report utilizing a multimodal mirror image® rehabilitation program. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 29:8,
1475-1480. [Crossref]
15. Taher Babaee, Mojtaba Kamyab, Amir Ahmadi, Mohammad Ali Sanjari, Mohammad Saleh Ganjavian. 2017. Measurement of
Milwaukee Brace Pad Pressure in Adolescent Round Back Deformity Treatment. Asian Spine Journal 11:4, 627. [Crossref]
16. Eva Barrett, Mary O'Keeffe, Kieran O'Sullivan, Jeremy Lewis, Karen McCreesh. 2016. Is thoracic spine posture associated with
shoulder pain, range of motion and function? A systematic review. Manual Therapy 26, 38-46. [Crossref]
17. Tae-Lim Yoon, Heon-Seock Cynn, Sil-Ah Choi, Ji-Hyun Lee, Bong-Sam Chio. 2016. Effect of the craniocervical brace on
craniocervical angle, thoracic kyphosis angle, and trunk extensor muscle activity during typing in subjects with forward head
posture. Work 55:1, 163-169. [Crossref]
18. Harm C.A. Graat, Janneke J.P. Schimmel, Roel J.W. Hoogendoorn, Lotte van Hessem, Allard Hosman, Marinus de Kleuver.
2016. Poor Radiological and Good Functional Long-term Outcome of Surgically Treated Scheuermann Patients. SPINE 41:14,
E869-E878. [Crossref]
19. Kurt Claeys, Simon Brumagne, Jan Deklerck, Jacques Vanderhaeghen, Wim Dankaerts. 2016. Sagittal evaluation of usual standing
and sitting spinal posture. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 20:2, 326-333. [Crossref]
20. Jakub Krejci, Jiri Gallo. 2016. Spinal shape analysis in 1,020 healthy young adults aged from 19 to 30 years. Acta Gymnica .
[Crossref]
21. Ryan D. Murtagh, Robert M. Quencer, Juan Uribe. 2016. Pelvic Evaluation in Thoracolumbar Corrective Spine Surgery: How
I Do It. Radiology 278:3, 646-656. [Crossref]
22. C. Uzun, E.D. Atman, E. Ustuner, S.A. Mirjalili, D. Oztuna, T.S. Esmer. 2016. Surface anatomy and anatomical planes in the
adult turkish population. Clinical Anatomy 29:2, 183-190. [Crossref]
23. Xin-Hua Shen, Bai-Yan Su, Jing-Juan Liu, Gu-Muyang Zhang, Hua-Dan Xue, Zheng-Yu Jin, S. Ali Mirjalili, Chao Ma. 2016. A
reappraisal of adult thoracic and abdominal surface anatomy via CT scan in Chinese population. Clinical Anatomy 29:2, 165-174.
[Crossref]
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 36.84.225.167 on 11/28/17 from IP address 36.84.225.167. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

24. Fahimeh Kamali, Sara Abolahrari Shirazi, Samaneh Ebrahimi, Maryam Mirshamsi, Ali Ghanbari. 2016. Comparison of manual
therapy and exercise therapy for postural hyperkyphosis: A randomized clinical trial. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 32:2,
92-97. [Crossref]
25. Seong-Dae Woo, Tae-Ho Kim. 2016. The effects of lumbar stabilization exercise with thoracic extension exercise on lumbosacral
alignment and the low back pain disability index in patients with chronic low back pain. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 28:2,
680-684. [Crossref]
26. Harry T. Mai, Sean M. Mitchell, Tyler J. Jenkins, Jason W. Savage, Alpesh A. Patel, Wellington K. Hsu. 2016. Accessibility of
the Cervicothoracic Junction Through an Anterior Approach. SPINE 41:1, 69-73. [Crossref]
27. Isuzu Meyer, Tatum A. McArthur, Ying Tang, Jessica L. McKinney, Sarah L. Morgan, Holly E. Richter. 2016. Pelvic Floor
Symptoms and Spinal Curvature in Women. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 22:4, 219-223. [Crossref]
28. Seok Jeong Lee, Ji Young Chang, Yon Ju Ryu, Jin Hwa Lee, Jung Hyun Chang, Sung Shine Shim, Ji Young Hwang. 2015.
Clinical Features and Outcomes of Respiratory Complications in Patients with Thoracic Hyperkyphosis. Lung 193:6, 1009-1015.
[Crossref]
29. Justin G. R. Fletcher, Mark D. Stringer, Christopher A. Briggs, Tilman M. Davies, Stephanie J. Woodley. 2015. CT morphometry
of adult thoracic intervertebral discs. European Spine Journal 24:10, 2321-2329. [Crossref]
30. G. Armbrecht, D. Felsenberg, M. Ganswindt, M. Lunt, S. K. Kaptoge, K. Abendroth, A. Aroso, D. Banzer, A. K. Bhalla, J.
Dequeker, R. Eastell, K. Hoszowski, G. Lyritis, P. D. Delmas, P. Masaryk, T. Miazgowski, J. Cannata, R. Nuti, L. Oei, G. Poor,
I. Redlund-Johnell, D. M. Reid, W. Reisinger, H. Schatz, C. J. Todd, A. D. Woolf, K. Javaid, F. Rivadeneira, A. J. Silman,
C. Cooper, T. W. O’Neill, J. Reeve. 2015. Vertebral Scheuermann’s disease in Europe: prevalence, geographic variation and
radiological correlates in men and women aged 50 and over. Osteoporosis International 26:10, 2509-2519. [Crossref]
31. Tamir Ailon, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Lawrence G. Lenke, James S. Harrop, Justin S. Smith. 2015. Progressive Spinal Kyphosis
in the Aging Population. Neurosurgery 77, S164-S172. [Crossref]
32. Shin Oe, Daisuke Togawa, Keiichi Nakai, Tomohiro Yamada, Hideyuki Arima, Tomohiro Banno, Tatsuya Yasuda, Sho Kobayasi,
Yu Yamato, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Go Yoshida, Yukihiro Matsuyama. 2015. The Influence of Age and Sex on Cervical Spinal
Alignment Among Volunteers Aged Over 50. Spine 40:19, 1487-1494. [Crossref]
33. Mark R. McKean, Brendan J. Burkett. 2015. Overhead shoulder press – In-front of the head or behind the head?. Journal of Sport
and Health Science 4:3, 250-257. [Crossref]
34. Elizabeth P. Norheim, Leah Y. Carreon, Daniel J. Sucato, Lawrence G. Lenke, Steven D. Glassman. 2015. Cervical Spine
Compensation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine Deformity 3:4, 327-331. [Crossref]
35. Trevor Axelrod, Fang Zhu, Laurie Lomasney, Bartosz Wojewnik. 2015. Scheuermann’s Disease (Dysostosis) of the Spine.
Orthopedics 38:1, 4-71. [Crossref]
36. Nicette Sergueef, Kenneth E. Nelson. Dysfonctions posturales 249-296. [Crossref]
37. Nicette Sergueef, Kenneth E. Nelson. Dysfonctions respiratoires 315-337. [Crossref]
38. Camila Thais Pinto Camara, Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira de Freitas, Waléria Paixão de Lima, Camila Astolphi Lima, César
Ferreira Amorim, Monica Rodrigues Perracini. 2015. Comparison of Two Methods for Estimating Adjustable One-Point Cane
Length in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Physiotherapy Research International n/a-n/a. [Crossref]
39. Wendy B Katzman, Dana Miller-Martinez, Lynn M Marshall, Nancy E Lane, Deborah M Kado. 2014. Kyphosis and paraspinal
muscle composition in older men: a cross-sectional study for the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) research group. BMC
Musculoskeletal Disorders 15:1. . [Crossref]
40. Deborah M Kado, Dana Miller-Martinez, Li-Yung Lui, Peggy Cawthon, Wendy B Katzman, Teresa A Hillier, Howard A Fink,
Kristine E Ensrud. 2014. Hyperkyphosis, Kyphosis Progression, and Risk of Non-Spine Fractures in Older Community Dwelling
Women: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF). Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 29:10, 2210-2216. [Crossref]
41. Brendan A. Williams, Hiroko Matsumoto, Daren J. McCalla, Behrooz A. Akbarnia, Laurel C. Blakemore, Randal R. Betz, John
M. Flynn, Charles E. Johnston, Richard E. McCarthy, David P. Roye, David L. Skaggs, John T. Smith, Brian D. Snyder, Paul D.
Sponseller, Peter F. Sturm, George H. Thompson, Muharrem Yazici, Michael G. Vitale. 2014. Development and Initial Validation
of the Classification of Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS). The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 96:16, 1359-1367. [Crossref]
42. Mahboobeh Mehdikhani, Hamid Behtash, Mohammad Saleh Ganjavian, Noor Azuan Abu Osman, Nafiseh Khalaj. 2014.
Treatment stability of Milwaukee brace in idiopathic hyperkyphosis. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 38:4, 316-320.
[Crossref]
43. Youngbae B. Kim, Yongjung J. Kim, Young-Joon Ahn, Gyu-Bok Kang, Jae-Hyuk Yang, Hyungtae Lim, Seung-Won Lee. 2014.
A comparative analysis of sagittal spinopelvic alignment between young and old men without localized disc degeneration. European
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 36.84.225.167 on 11/28/17 from IP address 36.84.225.167. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Spine Journal 23:7, 1400-1406. [Crossref]


44. Wai Weng Yoon, Fady Sedra, Suken Shah, Colin Wallis, Francesco Muntoni, Hilali Noordeen. 2014. Improvement of Pulmonary
Function in Children With Early-Onset Scoliosis Using Magnetic Growth Rods. Spine 39:15, 1196-1202. [Crossref]
45. Branko Skovrlj, Motasem Al Maaieh, Javier Guzman, John Caridi, Samuel K. Cho. 2014. The 100 Classic Papers in Spinal
Deformity Surgery. Spine Deformity 2:4, 241-247. [Crossref]
46. Go Yoshida, Tatsuya Yasuda, Daisuke Togawa, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Yu Yamato, Sho Kobayashi, Hideyuki Arima, Hironobu
Hoshino, Yukihiro Matsuyama. 2014. Craniopelvic Alignment in Elderly Asymptomatic Individuals. Spine 39:14, 1121-1127.
[Crossref]
47. Renata Neves Granito, Mariana Chaves Aveiro, Ana Claudia Muniz Rennó, Jorge Oishi, Patricia Driusso. 2014. Grau de cifose
torácica e pico de torque de flexores e extensores de tronco entre mulheres saudáveis. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia 49:3, 286-291.
[Crossref]
48. Renata Neves Granito, Mariana Chaves Aveiro, Ana Claudia Muniz Rennó, Jorge Oishi, Patricia Driusso. 2014. Degree of thoracic
kyphosis and peak torque of trunk flexors and extensors among healthy women. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)
49:3, 286-291. [Crossref]
49. Eui-Ju Shin, Byoung-Hee Lee. 2014. The effect of sustained natural apophyseal glides on headache, duration and cervical function
in women with cervicogenic headache. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation 10:2, 131-135. [Crossref]
50. Hiren M. Divecha, Irfan Siddique, Lee M. Breakwell, Peter A. Millner. 2014. Complications in spinal deformity surgery in the
United Kingdom: 5-year results of the annual British Scoliosis Society National Audit of Morbidity and Mortality. European
Spine Journal 23:S1, 55-60. [Crossref]
51. Furkan Erol Karabekmez, Ali Gokkaya, Cengiz Isik, Ibrahim Saglam, Fatih Burak Efeoglu, Metin Gorgu. 2014. Does Reduction
Mammaplasty Revert Skeletal Disturbances in the Vertebral Column of Patients With Macromastia? A Preliminary Study. Aesthetic
Plastic Surgery 38:1, 104-112. [Crossref]
52. MohammadBagher Shamsi, Korosh Veisi, Loghman Karimi, Javad Sarrafzadeh, Farid Najafi. 2014. Normal Range of Thoracic
Kyphosis in Male School Children. ISRN Orthopedics 2014, 1-5. [Crossref]
53. G. Bales. 2014. A semi-quantitative approach to variation of the azygos vein course. Clinical Anatomy n/a-n/a. [Crossref]
54. F. Shapiro, D. Zurakowski, T. Bui, B. T. Darras. 2014. Progression of spinal deformity in wheelchair-dependent patients with
Duchenne muscular dystrophy who are not treated with steroids: coronal plane (scoliosis) and sagittal plane (kyphosis, lordosis)
deformity. The Bone & Joint Journal 96-B:1, 100-105. [Crossref]
55. Norma J. MacIntyre, Chris P. Recknor, Julie C. Recknor. 2014. Spine Curve Measures Taken in Individuals with Osteoporosis
and Osteopenia Using the IONmed Mobile Phone Application Are Highly Consistent with Digital Inclinometer Measures. ISRN
Rehabilitation 2014, 1-6. [Crossref]
56. Marion Röthlisberger, Dominique P. Pioletti, Alain Farron, Alexandre Terrier. 2013. Effect of a pathological scapular tilt after
total shoulder arthroplasty. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 16:11, 1196-1201. [Crossref]
57. Daniel W.T. Wundersitz, Kevin J. Netto, Brad Aisbett, Paul B. Gastin. 2013. Validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer
to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks. Sports Biomechanics 12:4, 403-412.
[Crossref]
58. Symron Bansal, Wendy B. Katzman, Lora M. Giangregorio. 2013. Exercise for Improving Age-Related Hyperkyphotic Posture:
A Systematic Review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation . [Crossref]
59. Tamara Prushansky, Shira Geller, Amir Avraham, Chen Furman, Lee Sela. 2013. Angular and linear spinal parameters associated
with relaxed and erect postures in healthy subjects. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 29:3, 249-257. [Crossref]
60. Moon Soo Park, Seong-Hwan Moon, Hwan-Mo Lee, Seok Woo Kim, Tae-Hwan Kim, Seung Yeop Lee, K. Daniel Riew. 2013.
The Effect of Age on Cervical Sagittal Alignment. Spine 38:8, E458-E463. [Crossref]
61. Prokopis Papadimitriou, Athanasios Chalkias, Antonis Mastrokostopoulos, Irene Kapniari, Theodoros Xanthos. 2013. Anatomical
structures underneath the sternum in healthy adults and implications for chest compressions. The American Journal of Emergency
Medicine 31:3, 549-555. [Crossref]
62. Shihao Zhang, Rishi Wadhwa, Justin Haydel, Jamie Toms, Kendrick Johnson, Bharat Guthikonda. 2013. Spine and Spinal Cord
Trauma. Neurologic Clinics 31:1, 183-206. [Crossref]
63. William C. Warner, Jeffery R. Sawyer, Derek M. Kelly. Scoliosis and Kyphosis 1691-1895.e24. [Crossref]
64. Hasan Ghandhari, Hamid Hesarikia, Ebrahim Ameri, Abolfazl Noori. 2013. Assessment of Normal Sagittal Alignment of the
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 36.84.225.167 on 11/28/17 from IP address 36.84.225.167. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Spine and Pelvis in Children and Adolescents. BioMed Research International 2013, 1-7. [Crossref]
65. Hans-Rudolf Weiss. 2013. Brace Treatment Can Improve Thoracic Kyphosis During Growth: A Case Report. The Open Access
Journal of Science and Technology 1. . [Crossref]
66. Armen R. Deukmedjian, Tien V. Le, Ali A. Baaj, Elias Dakwar, Donald A. Smith, Juan S. Uribe. 2012. Anterior longitudinal
ligament release using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: a cadaveric feasibility study and report
of 4 clinical cases. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 17:6, 530-539. [Crossref]
67. F. Tomé-Bermejo, A.I. Tsirikos. 2012. Conceptos actuales sobre la enfermedad de Scheuermann: presentación clínica, diagnóstico
y controversias sobre su tratamiento. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología 56:6, 491-505. [Crossref]
68. F. Tomé-Bermejo, A.I. Tsirikos. 2012. Current concepts on Scheuermann kyphosis: Clinical presentation, diagnosis and
controversies around treatment. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition) 56:6, 491-505. [Crossref]
69. Stephen Edmondston, Andrij Ferguson, Patrick Ippersiel, Lars Ronningen, Stig Sodeland, Luke Barclay. 2012. Clinical and
Radiological Investigation of Thoracic Spine Extension Motion During Bilateral Arm Elevation. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports
Physical Therapy 42:10, 861-869. [Crossref]
70. S. Ali Mirjalili, Sarah L. McFadden, Tim Buckenham, Ben Wilson, Mark D. Stringer. 2012. Anatomical planes: Are we teaching
accurate surface anatomy?. Clinical Anatomy 25:7, 819-826. [Crossref]
71. S. Ali Mirjalili, Samuel J.M. Hale, Tim Buckenham, Ben Wilson, Mark D. Stringer. 2012. A reappraisal of adult thoracic surface
anatomy. Clinical Anatomy 25:7, 827-834. [Crossref]
72. Eun-Kyung Koh, Do-Young Jung. 2012. Comparison of Muscle Activities of Thoracic and Lumbar Extensors during Trunk Lift
Exercises According to Exercise Position. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics 22:3, 341-348. [Crossref]
73. Diana M. Perriman, Jennifer M. Scarvell, Andrew R. Hughes, Christian J. Lueck, Keith B. G. Dear, Paul N. Smith. 2012.
Thoracic Hyperkyphosis: A Survey of Australian Physiotherapists. Physiotherapy Research International 17:3, 167-178. [Crossref]
74. Craig M. McDonald, William M. Fowler. 2012. The Role of the Neuromuscular Medicine and Physiatry Specialists in the
Multidisciplinary Management of Neuromuscular Disease. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 23:3,
475-493. [Crossref]
75. Yasutsugu Yukawa, Fumihiko Kato, Kota Suda, Masatsune Yamagata, Takayoshi Ueta. 2012. Age-related changes in osseous
anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine. Part I: Radiographic data from over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects.
European Spine Journal 21:8, 1492-1498. [Crossref]
76. Samuel R. Schroerlucke, Behrooz A. Akbarnia, Jeff B. Pawelek, Pooria Salari, Gregory M. Mundis, Muharrem Yazici, John B.
Emans, Paul D. Sponseller. 2012. How Does Thoracic Kyphosis Affect Patient Outcomes in Growing Rod Surgery?. Spine 37:15,
1303-1309. [Crossref]
77. Pierre A. d'Hemecourt, M. Timothy Hresko. 2012. Spinal Deformity in Young Athletes. Clinics in Sports Medicine 31:3, 441-451.
[Crossref]
78. John P. Handrakis, Karen Friel, Frank Hoeffner, Ola Akinkunle, Vito Genova, Edward Isakov, Jerrill Mathew, Frank Vitulli. 2012.
Key Characteristics of Low Back Pain and Disability in College-Aged Adults: A Pilot Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation 93:7, 1217-1224. [Crossref]
79. Claudio Silveri, Alejandro Cúneo, Asdrúbal Silveri. 2012. Resultados de una encuesta sobre tratamiento de la cifosis torácica
causada por enfermedad de Scheuermann. Coluna/Columna 11:2, 106-109. [Crossref]
80. Carleen Lindsey. Impaired posture 292-315. [Crossref]
81. Tatiana Scheeren de Oliveira, Cláudia Tarragô Candotti, Marcelo La Torre, Patricia Paula Tonin Pelinson, Tássia Silveira
Furlanetto, Fernanda Machado Kutchak, Jefferson Fagundes Loss. 2012. Validity and Reproducibility of the Measurements
Obtained Using the Flexicurve Instrument to Evaluate the Angles of Thoracic and Lumbar Curvatures of the Spine in the Sagittal
Plane. Rehabilitation Research and Practice 2012, 1-9. [Crossref]
82. Hirokatsu HIRATA, Chiaki YAGURA, Shinichiro OKA, Kazuyo YOSHIMURA, Nozomi HAMACHI, Hiroyuki TAHARA.
2012. Measurement of the Thoracic Kyphosis Angle with a Digital Inclinometer. Rigakuryoho Kagaku 27:2, 115-118. [Crossref]
83. Teresa A Hillier, Li-Yung Lui, Deborah M Kado, ES LeBlanc, Kimberly K Vesco, Douglas C Bauer, Jane A Cauley, Kristine E
Ensrud, Dennis M Black, Marc C Hochberg, Steven R Cummings. 2012. Height loss in older women: Risk of hip fracture and
mortality independent of vertebral fractures. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 27:1, 153-159. [Crossref]
84. G. A. Greendale, N. S. Nili, M.-H. Huang, L. Seeger, A. S. Karlamangla. 2011. The reliability and validity of three non-
radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle. Osteoporosis International
22:6, 1897-1905. [Crossref]
85. Morin Lang-Tapia, Vanesa España-Romero, Juan Anelo, Manuel J. Castillo. 2011. Differences on Spinal Curvature in Standing
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 36.84.225.167 on 11/28/17 from IP address 36.84.225.167. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Position by Gender, Age and Weight Status Using a Noninvasive Method. Journal of Applied Biomechanics 27:2, 143-150. [Crossref]
86. Steven S. Agabegi, Namdar Kazemi, Alvin H. Crawford. Pediatric Kyphosis 451-468. [Crossref]
87. James M. Schuster, Neil R. Malhotra. Posterior Thoracic Instrumentation 3061-3067. [Crossref]
88. Abdulamir Saiiari, Behrouz Khodayari, Mehdi Bostani. 2011. Relation between Increasing Spinal Curve and Anxiety. Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences 30, 2246-2248. [Crossref]
89. Jeremy S Lewis, Rachel E Valentine. 2010. Clinical measurement of the thoracic kyphosis. A study of the intra-rater reliability in
subjects with and without shoulder pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 11:1. . [Crossref]
90. JC de Mauroy, HR Weiss, AG Aulisa, L Aulisa, JI Brox, J Durmala, C Fusco, TB Grivas, J Hermus, T Kotwicki, G Le Blay, A
Lebel, L Marcotte, S Negrini, L Neuhaus, T Neuhaus, P Pizzetti, L Revzina, B Torres, PJM Van Loon, E Vasiliadis, M Villagrasa,
M Werkman, M Wernicka, MS Wong, F Zaina. 2010. 7th SOSORT consensus paper: conservative treatment of idiopathic &
Scheuermann's kyphosis. Scoliosis 5:1. . [Crossref]
91. Juan Javier Moreira Moreira, Andres Edgar Rodriguez Fuentes, Paulo Henrique De Castro Corrêa. 2010. Estudo radiológico do
valor angular da cifose torácica em adolescentes. Coluna/Columna 9:4, 353-357. [Crossref]
92. Carlos Henrique Maçaneiro, Ricardo Kiyoshi Miyamoto, Rodrigo Fetter Lauffer, Luciano Leandro Martins. 2010. Comparação
entre dois métodos de posicionamento para realização do raio X e sua repercussão na avaliação da cifose torácica utilizando o método
de Cobb e no equilíbrio sagital. Coluna/Columna 9:4, 363-369. [Crossref]
93. Wendy B. Katzman, Linda Wanek, John A. Shepherd, Deborah E. Sellmeyer. 2010. Age-Related Hyperkyphosis: Its Causes,
Consequences, and Management. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 40:6, 352-360. [Crossref]
94. Diana M. Perriman, Jennifer M. Scarvell, Andrew R. Hughes, Bryan Ashman, Christian J. Lueck, Paul N. Smith. 2010. Validation
of the Flexible Electrogoniometer for Measuring Thoracic Kyphosis. Spine 35:14, E633-E640. [Crossref]
95. . REFERENCES 1068-1104. [Crossref]
96. In-Sook Lee. Imaging Diagnosis of the Degenerative Spine 58-110. [Crossref]
97. Yuko Hashimoto, Mayumi Kuno-Mizumura. 2010. Effects of aging on thoracic and lumbar spinal mobility. Taiikugaku kenkyu
(Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences) 55:2, 333-342. [Crossref]
98. Hans-Rudolf Weiss, Deborah Turnbull, Silvia Bohr. 2009. Brace treatment for patients with Scheuermann's disease - a review of
the literature and first experiences with a new brace design. Scoliosis 4:1. . [Crossref]
99. Robert B. Winter, John E. Lonstein, Francis Denis. 2009. Sagittal Spinal Alignment: The True Measurement, Norms, and
Description of Correction for Thoracic Kyphosis. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 22:5, 311-314. [Crossref]
100. Tomaž Vrtovec, Franjo Pernuš, Boštjan Likar. 2009. A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. European
Spine Journal 18:5, 593-607. [Crossref]
101. Murray Maitland. Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck and Shoulder and Ergonomic Interventions . [Crossref]
102. Yi-Liang Kuo, Elizabeth A. Tully, Mary P. Galea. 2009. Video Analysis of Sagittal Spinal Posture in Healthy Young and Older
Adults. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 32:3, 210-215. [Crossref]
103. Patrícia Jundi Penha, Marina Baldini, Sílvia Maria Amado João. 2009. Spinal Postural Alignment Variance According to Sex and
Age in 7- and 8-Year-Old Children. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 32:2, 154-159. [Crossref]
104. E. Garrido, F. Tome-Bermejo, S. K. Tucker, H. N. N. Noordeen, T. R. Morley. 2008. Short anterior instrumented fusion and
posterior convex non-instrumented fusion of hemivertebra for congenital scoliosis in very young children. European Spine Journal
17:11, 1507-1514. [Crossref]
105. Anne Smith, Peter OʼSullivan, Leon Straker. 2008. Classification of Sagittal Thoraco-Lumbo-Pelvic Alignment of the Adolescent
Spine in Standing and Its Relationship to Low Back Pain. Spine 33:19, 2101-2107. [Crossref]
106. Toshimi Aizawa, Tetsuro Sato, Hiroshi Ozawa, Naoki Morozumi, Fujio Matsumoto, Hirotoshi Sasaki, Takeshi Hoshikawa,
Chikashi Kawahara, Shoichi Kokubun, Eiji Itoi. 2008. Sagittal alignment changes after thoracic laminectomy in adults. Journal
of Neurosurgery: Spine 8:6, 510-516. [Crossref]
107. Barney L. Freeman. Scoliosis and Kyphosis 1921-2158. [Crossref]
108. . Kyphosis 413-441. [Crossref]
109. Tomasz Kotwicki. 2008. Evaluation of scoliosis today: Examination, X-rays and beyond. Disability and Rehabilitation 30:10,
742-751. [Crossref]
110. C. Garreau de Loubresse, R. Vialle, S. Wolff. 2008. Cyphoses pathologiques. EMC - Radiologie et imagerie médicale -
Musculosquelettique - Neurologique - Maxillofaciale 3:1, 1-33. [Crossref]
111. Amy L McIntosh, Daniel J Sucato. 2007. Scheuermannʼs kyphosis. Current Opinion in Orthopaedics 18:6, 536-543. [Crossref]
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 36.84.225.167 on 11/28/17 from IP address 36.84.225.167. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

112. Carlos Alberto Giglio, Jose Batista Volpon. 2007. Development and evaluation of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis during
growth. Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 1:3, 187. [Crossref]
113. Sheila A. Dugan. 2007. Exercise for Health and Wellness at Midlife and Beyond: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Physical Medicine
and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 18:3, 555-575. [Crossref]
114. A. M. Briggs, T. V. Wrigley, E. A. Tully, P. E. Adams, A. M. Greig, K. L. Bennell. 2007. Radiographic measures of thoracic
kyphosis in osteoporosis: Cobb and vertebral centroid angles. Skeletal Radiology 36:8, 761-767. [Crossref]
115. Phillip S. Sizer, Jean-Michel Brismée, Chad Cook. 2007. Coupling Behavior of the Thoracic Spine: A Systematic Review of the
Literature. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 30:5, 390-399. [Crossref]
116. Thomas G. Lowe. 2007. Scheuermann's Kyphosis. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 18:2, 305-315. [Crossref]
117. A. M. Greig, K. L. Bennell, A. M. Briggs, J. D. Wark, P. W. Hodges. 2007. Balance impairment is related to vertebral fracture
rather than thoracic kyphosis in individuals with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis International 18:4, 543-551. [Crossref]
118. Angel E. Macagno, Michael F. O’Brien. 2006. Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Kyphosis in Adults. Spine 31:Suppl, S161-S170.
[Crossref]
119. Michael P. Steinmetz, Daniel K. Resnick. 2006. Thoracolumbar Fractures. Contemporary Neurosurgery 28:8, 1-5. [Crossref]
120. C. Garreau de Loubresse, R. Vialle, S. Wolff. 2006. Cyphoses pathologiques. EMC - Appareil locomoteur 1:1, 1-33. [Crossref]
121. Michael P. Steinmetz, Daniel K. Resnick. 2006. Thoracolumbar Fractures. Contemporary Neurosurgery 28:7, 1. [Crossref]
122. Vincent Arlet, Dietrich Schlenzka. 2005. Scheuermann’s kyphosis: surgical management. European Spine Journal 14:9, 817-827.
[Crossref]
123. Peter S. Rose, Howard P. Levy, Ruth M. Liberfarb, Joie Davis, Y. Szymko-Bennett, Benjamin I. Rubin, Ekaterini Tsilou, Andrew
J. Griffith, Clair A. Francomano. 2005. Stickler syndrome: Clinical characteristics and diagnostic criteria. American Journal of
Medical Genetics Part A 138A:3, 199-207. [Crossref]
124. C. Garreau de Loubresse, R. Vialle, S. Wolff. 2005. Cyphoses pathologiques. EMC - Rhumatologie-Orthopédie 2:3, 294-334.
[Crossref]
125. Steven D. Glassman, Sigurd Berven, Keith Bridwell, William Horton, John R. Dimar. 2005. Correlation of Radiographic
Parameters and Clinical Symptoms in Adult Scoliosis. Spine 30:6, 682-688. [Crossref]
126. C. Garreau de Loubresse, R. Vialle, S. Wolff. 2005. Cifosis patológicas. EMC - Aparato Locomotor 38:2, 1-32. [Crossref]
127. Christian Mazel, E. Hoffmann, P. Antonietti, D. Grunenwald, M. Henry, J. Williams. 2004. Posterior Cervicothoracic
Instrumentation in Spine Tumors. Spine 29:11, 1246-1253. [Crossref]
128. Thomas M. Gavin. 2003. The Etiology and Natural History of Scheuermann???s Kyphosis. JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
15:SUPPLEMENT, S11-S16. [Crossref]
129. Munish C. Gupta. 2003. Degenerative scoliosis. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 34:2, 269-279. [Crossref]
130. Donald D. Harrison, Deed E. Harrison, Tadeusz J. Janik, Rene Cailliet, Jason Haas. 2003. Do Alterations in Vertebral and Disc
Dimensions Affect an Elliptical Model of Thoracic Kyphosis?. Spine 28:5, 463-469. [Crossref]
131. Tsukasa Nishiura, Tomoko Maruo, Kazuhiro Takayama, Sanami Kawada, Kotaro Ogihara, Masaki Gotoh, Kazuyuki Tsuno. 2003.
Vertebroplasty through Extrapleural Approach for Osteoporotic Compression Fracture of the Thoracic Spine. Spinal Surgery 17:3,
225-232. [Crossref]
132. Ross R. Moquin, Michael K. Rosner, Patrick B. Cooper. 2003. Combined anterior–posterior fusion with laterally placed threaded
interbody cages and pedicle screws for Scheuermann kyphosis. Neurosurgical Focus 14:1, 1-5. [Crossref]
133. Gail A. Greendale, Anna McDivit, Annie Carpenter, Leanne Seeger, Mei-Hua Huang. 2002. Yoga for Women With
Hyperkyphosis: Results of a Pilot Study. American Journal of Public Health 92:10, 1611-1614. [Crossref]
134. Alan K. Stotts, John T. Smith, Steven D. Santora, James W. Roach, Jacques L. D’Astous. 2002. Measurement of Spinal Kyphosis.
Spine 27:19, 2143-2146. [Crossref]
135. Jeffrey J.W. Boyle, Nicholas Milne, Kevin P. Singer. 2002. Influence of age on cervicothoracic spinal curvature: An ex vivo
radiographic survey. Clinical Biomechanics 17:5, 361-367. [Crossref]
136. C.L. Soo, Philip C. Noble, Stephen I. Esses. 2002. Scheuermann kyphosis. The Spine Journal 2:1, 49-56. [Crossref]
137. Hak Jin Min, Keun Woo Kim, Yong Hoon Kim, Ui Seoung Yoon, Joon Sung Hwang. 2002. The Comparison of Loss of Reduction
at the Thoracolumbar Fracture According to Insertion of Screw Including Fractured Vertebra or not in Short Segment Posterolat
Fusion. Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery 9:1, 19. [Crossref]
138. Peter S. Rose, Nicholas U. Ahn, Howard P. Levy, Uri M. Ahn, Joie Davis, Ruth M. Liberfarb, Leelakrishna Nallamshetty, Paul
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 36.84.225.167 on 11/28/17 from IP address 36.84.225.167. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

D. Sponseller, Clair A. Francomano. 2001. Thoracolumbar Spinal Abnormalities in Stickler Syndrome. Spine 26:4, 403-409.
[Crossref]
139. Deed E. Harrison, Donald D. Harrison, Stephan J. Troyanovich, Stacy Harmon. 2000. A normal spinal position: It's time to
accept the evidence. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 23:9, 623-644. [Crossref]
140. Liisa I. Kerttula, Willy S. Serlo, Osmo A. Tervonen, Eija L. Pääkkö, Heikki V. Vanharanta. 2000. Post-Traumatic Findings of
the Spine After Earlier Vertebral Fracture in Young Patients. Spine 25:9, 1104-1108. [Crossref]
141. Edward M. Wojtys, James A. Ashton-Miller, Laura J. Huston, Paul J. Moga. 2000. The Association between Athletic Training
Time and the Sagittal Curvature of the Immature Spine. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 28:4, 490-498. [Crossref]
142. JOHN K. NGUYEN, LAWRENCE R. LIND, JENNIFER Y. CHOE, FRANCIS MCKINDSEY, ROBERT SINOW,
NARENDER N. BHATIA. 2000. Lumbosacral Spine and Pelvic Inlet Changes Associated With Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Obstetrics
& Gynecology 95:3, 332-336. [Crossref]
143. Jean-Philippe Lambert. 2000. Osteoporosis: A New Challenge in Cystic Fibrosis. Pharmacotherapy 20:1, 34-51. [Crossref]
144. Dennis R. Wenger, Steven L. Frick. 1999. Scheuermann Kyphosis. Spine 24:24, 2630. [Crossref]
145. Thomas G. Lowe. 1999. SCHEUERMANN'S DISEASE. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 30:3, 475-485. [Crossref]
146. Michael L. Boninger, Tracy Saur, Elaine Trefler, Douglas A. Hobson, Ray Burdett, Rory A. Cooper. 1998. Postural changes
with aging in tetraplegia: Effects on life satisfaction and pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 79:12, 1577-1581.
[Crossref]
147. Clifford B. Tribus. 1998. Scheuermann’s Kyphosis in Adolescents and Adults: Diagnosis and Management. Journal of the American
Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 6:1, 36-43. [Crossref]
148. Kristine E. Ensrud, Dennis M. Black, Fran Harris, Bruce Ettinger, Steven R. Cummings. 1997. Correlates of Kyphosis in Older
Women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 45:6, 682-687. [Crossref]
149. Tomoko Kobayashi, Teiji Tominaga, Hisashi Abiko, Takashi Yoshimoto. 1997. Anterior Decompression and Fusion with an
Iliac Bone and Plate for Kyphosis developing after Cervical Laminectomy: A Case Report. Japanese Journal of Neurosurgery 6:9,
639-643. [Crossref]
150. David W. Polly, Francis X. Kilkelly, Kathleen A. McHale, Lynn M. Asplund, Michael Mulligan, Audrey S. Chang. 1996.
Measurement of Lumbar Lordosis. Spine 21:13, 1530-1535. [Crossref]
151. R.A. Manns, M.J. Haddaway, I.W. McCall, V. Cassar Pullicino, M.W.J. Davie. 1996. The relative contribution of disc and vertebral
morphometry to the angle of kyphosis in asymptomatic subjects. Clinical Radiology 51:4, 258-262. [Crossref]
152. Jeffrey J. W. Boyle, Kevin P. Singer, Nicholas Milne. 1996. Morphological Survey of the Cervicothoracic Junctional Region. Spine
21:5, 544-548. [Crossref]
153. SEIICHI ISHIKAWA, S. JAY KUMAR, HIDEAKI E. TAKAHASHI, MASAFUMI HOMMA. 1996. Vertebral Body Shape as
a Predictor of Spinal Deformity in Osteogenesis Imperfecta*. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 78:2, 212-9. [Crossref]
154. Richard C. Henderson, Cynthia D. Madsen. 1996. Bone density in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. The Journal of
Pediatrics 128:1, 28-34. [Crossref]
155. Paul D. Sponseller, William Hobbs, Lee H. Riley, Reed E. Pyeritz. 1995. The Thoracolumbar Spine in Marfan Syndrome. The
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 77:6, 867-876. [Crossref]
156. S J Edmondston, K P Singer, R I Price, R E Day, P D Breidahl. 1994. The relationship between bone mineral density, vertebral
body shape and spinal curvature in the elderly thoracolumbar spine: an in vitro study. The British Journal of Radiology 67:802,
969-975. [Crossref]
157. Richard C. Henderson, Barbara B. Specter. 1994. Kyphosis and fractures in children and young adults with cystic fibrosis. The
Journal of Pediatrics 125:2, 208-212. [Crossref]
158. Elsie Culham, Malcolm Peat. 1994. Spinal and shoulder complex posture. II: thoracic alignment and shoulder complex position
in normal and osteoporotic women. Clinical Rehabilitation 8:1, 27-35. [Crossref]
159. Elsie Culham, Malcolm Peat. 1993. Spinal and shoulder complex posture. I: measurement using the 3Space lsotrak. Clinical
Rehabilitation 7:4, 309-318. [Crossref]
160. Marie-Martine Logvinoff, Gerald T. Fon, Lynn M. Taussig, Michael J. Pitt. 1984. Kyphosis and Pulmonary Function in Cystic
Fibrosis. Clinical Pediatrics 23:7, 389-392. [Crossref]
161. S. WILLNER, B. JOHNSON. 1983. THORACIC KYPHOSIS AND LUMBAR LORDOSIS DURING THE GROWTH
PERIOD IN CHILDREN. Acta Paediatrica 72:6, 873-878. [Crossref]
162. F.L. Chan, Walter W.C. Chen, Philip H.C. Wong, Joseph S.F. Chow. 1983. Skeletal abnormalities in mitral-valve prolapse.
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 36.84.225.167 on 11/28/17 from IP address 36.84.225.167. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Clinical Radiology 34:2, 207-213. [Crossref]

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen