Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Winston & Strawn, moves this Court, pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction ordering Defendants
(collectively, “Islandview”), and George P. Riddick, III (“Riddick”) to cease and desist from
network of dealers (“Bernina Dealer Network”). In support of its Motion for Temporary
Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, Bernina submits herewith the Affidavit of Michael
Perich (“Perich”) and its Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion for Temporary
2. In or about June 2010, Defendants began to send a series of email messages and
letters directly to the members of the Bernina Dealer Network, making false allegations of
copyright infringement against Bernina and the Bernina Dealer Network and threatening
litigation if Bernina and the dealers did not settle with Imageline.
3. Among other things, these communications have included numerous false and
defamatory statements about Bernina including: (1) that Bernina has engaged in willful copyright
infringement; (2) that Bernina and its corporate officers have acted unethically; (3) that Bernina
and its corporate officers have ignored the best interests of the dealers and has exposed them to
legal liability; (4) that Bernina and its corporate officers have knowingly made false statements
to the Bernina dealers and others; (5) that Bernina and its corporate officers have directly caused
damage to the Bernina independent dealers; and (6) that Bernina and its corporate officers have
Bernina has not reproduced, displayed, marketed, sold, distributed or otherwise engaged in any
unauthorized exercise of any of the exclusive rights with respect to the images Imageline
purports to own; and (2) for reasons discussed in Bernina’s memorandum in support of the
instant motion (all of which are known to Defendants) Imageline is not entitled to assert federal
5. Defendants know that their statements and allegations are false or, at the very
least, were made with “reckless disregard” for the truth or falsity their statements.
against Bernina and the Bernina Dealer Network are baseless, unsubstantiated, false and
2
Case 1:10-cv-04917 Document 7 Filed 08/05/10 Page 3 of 6
deceptive. Bernina has demanded that Defendants cease and desist from their harassment and
conduct constitutes tortious interference with contractual relationships under Illinois common
law.
8. Despite notice of and actual knowledge that their claims and allegations are false,
and Bernina’s demand that Defendants immediately refrain from engaging in such conduct,
Defendants’ threats and harassment of Bernina and the Bernina Dealer Network, their tortious
interference with Bernina’s contractual relationship with its dealers, and their publication of
contacting dealers in the Bernina Dealer Network for the purpose of making these defamatory
statements about Bernina and purposefully interfering with Bernina’s contractual relationship
10. Defendants’ unlawful actions have been successful in their intended purpose of
creating fear and confusion among the dealers in the Bernina Dealer Network—many of which
11. Defendants’ unlawful actions have caused Bernina to suffer substantial damage,
including, among other things, money damages, loss of competitive position, goodwill, lost
12. Defendants’ wrongful conduct continues to threaten Bernina and its relationships
with its dealers and, unless enjoined, will cause further irreparable harm.
3
Case 1:10-cv-04917 Document 7 Filed 08/05/10 Page 4 of 6
has shown that it will succeed on the merits; (2) Bernina’s injuries caused by Defendants’
actions, including damage to its business reputation and loss of goodwill, are immediate,
continuing, and irreparable, and Bernina has no adequate remedy at law; (3) the balance of harms
favors Bernina as the harm to Bernina is severe, long-term, and irreparable; and (4) the public
interest plainly disfavors such outrageous and deceitful behavior on the part of Defendants.
employees and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with them
who receive actual notice of the order by personal service or otherwise, from:
otherwise;
c. Bernina and its corporate officers have ignored the best interests of
4
Case 1:10-cv-04917 Document 7 Filed 08/05/10 Page 5 of 6
activities.
ii. from making contact with Bernina’s authorized dealers in the Bernina
B. Grant Bernina such other and further relief as this Court may deem just.
5
Case 1:10-cv-04917 Document 7 Filed 08/05/10 Page 6 of 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Imageline Incorporated
Registered Agent: George P. Riddick III
202 England Street Ste A
Ashland, VA 23005-0000
griddick@imageline2.com
Copyrights@imageline2.com
info@imageline2.com
via electronic mail, facsimile, and Federal Express Overnight Mail this August 5, 2010.