Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The Consumer Protection Act was initially enacted during 1986 and
implemented w.e.f. April 15, 1987 to enable the consumers to enforce
his rights as consumer through a simple legal procedure (not
applicable in J &K). A comprehensive amendment [The Consumer
Protection (Amendment) Act 2002 has been passed on Dec 17, 2002
(implemented w.e.f March 15, 2003, the World Consumer Rights Day).
The major provisions of the amended Act are as under:
Consumer
My person who buys goods or services for consideration is known as
consumer. However a person purchasing on resale is not a consumer.
Scope
The act covers all goods and services including banking, insurance,
transport, processing, electricity, doctors etc. in private, public and co-
operative sectors.
Procedure
A consumer can lodge a complaint individually or jointly, or a voluntary
consumer organization. The complaint can be lodged at any forum by a
simple written application in duplicate with details of the case, the
name and full address of the complaint and the relief sought along with
the copies of the supporting documents.
Limitation
Limitation for lodging the complaint under the act is two years from the
date of cause of action.
Jurisdiction
The complaint for disputes involving up to Rs. 20 lac can be filled in the
District Forum. State Forum deals with the complaints more than Rs. 20
Lac to Rs. 1 crore and the National Commission deals with complaints
over Rs. 1 crore.
Disposal-Time
The cases not involving testing or analysis of the goods and
commodities should be disposed of in 3 months. The cases at State and
National Commissions should be disposed of in 3 months.
Available--Reliefs
The forum may award the compensation by order of removal of defect
from the goods, removal of deficiencies from the services, replacement
by new good free from defects, refund of price/charges, award of
compensation for loss of injury suffered, discontinuance/non repetition
of the unfair and restrictive trade practices, prohibition of sale of goods
of hazardous nature and providing for adequate cost to the party.
Penalty
Non compliance of orders of the Forum or lodging of frivolous
complaint may result in the imprisonment from one month to three
years or fine not less than Rs. 2,000 and up to Rs. 10,000/ or both.
Appeals
(a) Appeal against the judgment of District Forum is to be filed before
the state commission by Deposit of Rs.25, 000 or 50% of the claim
amount whichever is less.
b) Appeal against the judgment of District Forum is to be filled before
the National Commission by deposit of Rs. 35,000 or 50% of the claim
amount whichever is less.
(c) Appeal against the judgment of National Commission is to be filled
before the Supreme Court by deposit of Rs. 50,000 or 50% of the claim
amount whichever is less.
The customer is the person or group that receives the work output.
That work may be a product or a service. Within an enterprise,
customers are recipients of process outputs performed by suppliers.
Each customer then becomes the supplier in subsequent process steps.
Ultimately, the output of this network is a product or service provided
to an external customer. The customer is the final arbiter of quality,
value, and price of products and services. There are three types of
customers: the self-unit customer, the internal customer, and the
external customer. All individuals are self-unit customers of
themselves. Self-inspection, a disciplined attitude, and a desire for
excellence should be the way of life for everyone. Internal customers
are those who receive output from one or more internal process
owners. External customers receive the finished good or service from
the firm as a whole. The inputs of all customers-self-unit, internal, and
external-must be considered in the project management process. To
achieve total customer satisfaction, the needs, wants, and priorities of
customers must be incorporated in the design and development,
manufacturing, and service stages. Emphasis on excellent quality,
performance, schedule and delivery, cost and professional courtesy is a
must for customer satisfaction.
PEAD-Model
The improvement process should span the entire product and service
life cycle. The improvement process should focus on effective ways of
integrating product and service development objectives with
manufacturing and marketing capabilities. It also involves
institutionalizing total performance and improvement in the product
and service life cycle from concept to commercialization. Ongoing use
of tools and techniques that reduce total cycle time, contribute to
improved product and service value, and respond to customer needs is
recommended.
The evaluation process for final products and services also serves as a
means for defining a baseline for product and service performance in
the marketplace. With the knowledge gained from the evaluation
process, ongoing improvement strategies are employed to achieve
future FTTM objectives. The customer is the ultimate judge of the
value, price, quality, performance, and usefulness of the products and
services.
Poor communication with the end user: Customers who have been
given inappropriate or inadequate information on products and
services have the right to complain. What about the customer who
buys an item that ‘requires some assembly” and discovers; that
instructions are either not available or are written in a style that has
more in common with Sanskrit than English? Sympathize with a
custumer trying to get information about services from a government
agency and finding an endless labyrinth of transfers and holds. Pity
customers who have to speak with 10 people in an organization before
they get the information they want. Lack of communication, slow
communication, or inappropriate communication with customers can
lead to a number of complaints.
A retired businessman from the city did just that. And that too without
help from a lawyer. Ashok Tolat, 80, who fought a five-year legal battle
with General Motors (I) Private Limited, has finally been granted justice.
His car was nowhere close to what they made it look like in the
brochure — ‘An SUV to beat all SUVs’.
Trouble tale
Before buying the car, Tolat had gone through brochures which stated
that it was an SUV. He paid Rs 14 lakh for it after discount and spent
another Rs 2 lakh to do it up. A year later, during the July 2005 deluge
in Mumbai, Tolat’s car refused to start.
The first round of repairs was done under warranty. A couple of days
later, when it rained heavily, the car broke down once again. “The
frequent breakdowns made me wonder about the car’s capability. The
dealer told me that the owner’s manual stated that it was a passenger
vehicle with limited off-road capabilities. Selling such a car in the name
of a SUV was cheating. Its original brochure termed it an SUV,” said
Tolat.
Victory Ahead