Chapter 4

Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data

This chapter contains how the data were organized, analyzed and interpreted. It also discusses

the implications of the collected data and careful analyses were utilized to correct the assumptions of

the study to actual data gathered based on the stated problems of the study.

Problem No. 1: What are the profile of the respondents according to Age, Gender, Educational

Attainment and Civil Status?

1. Profile of the Respondents

1.1-2 Age

Table 1.1 Profile of the Respondents According to Age. (Barangay Carmen Respondents)

Age Frequency Percentage (%)

20 Below 8 16
21-30 22 44
31-40 12 24
41 Above 8 16
Total 50 100

As shown in Table 1.1, most of the respondents (44%) or 22 years old were 21-30 years old.

Second in number were 12 respondents with a percentage of 24% were in 31-40 years old. The

respondents who were in 20 below and 41 above have the same frequency (8) and percentage (16%).

The table shows that majority (44%) of the respondents were in the ages of 21-30 years old. The table

indicates that the respondents who were in 21-30 years old were more active in answering the questions

relating to the Police Visibility Program of the Philippine National Police in Barangay Carmen.

Table 1.2 Profile of the Respondents According to Age. (Barangay Cogon Respondents)

Age Frequency Percentage (%)

20 Below 11 22
21-30 16 32
31-40 20 40
 41 Above 3 6
Total 50 100

Table 1.2 shows that the majority of the respondents were in the ages of 31-40 wherein their

frequencies are 20 with the percentage of 40%. Second in the number are the respondents who were in

the ages 21-30 with the frequency of 16 respondents and percentage of 32%. Third in the number are

the respondents who were in 20 below with a frequency of 11 respondents and percentage of 22%. The

least are the respondents who were in the ages 41 above with the frequency of 3 respondents and

percentage of 6%. This simply states that the respondents who were in the ages 31-40 years old were

more active in answering the questions relating to the study.

1.3-4 Gender;

Table 1.3 Profile of the Respondents According to Gender. (Barangay Carmen Respondents)

Gender Frequency Percentage (%)

Male 18 36
Female 32 64
Total 50 100

Table 1.2 shows the profile of the respondents according to gender. It shows in the table that

majority of the respondents were female (64%) with a frequency of 32 while the male respondents have

the percentage of 36% with a frequency of 18. This simply indicates that there were more females than

males in Barangay Carmen.

Table 1.4 Profile of the Respondents According to Gender. (Barangay Cogon Respondents)

Gender Frequency Percentage (%)

Male 34 68
Female 16 32
Total 50 100
 Table 1.4 shows that males were more active in answering the questionnaire relating to the

study with the percentage of 68% while females have the percentage of 32%.

1.5-6 Educational Attainment

Table 1.5 Profile of the Respondents According Educational Attainment. (Barangay Carmen Respondents)

Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage (%)

Elementary 3 6
High School 23 46
College 18 36
Vocational 6 12
Total 50 100

Table 1.5 shows that the majority of the respondents in terms of educational attainment were in

high school with the frequency of 23 respondents and percentage of 46%. Next are the respondents who

were in college with the frequency of 18 respondents and percentage of 36%. Third in the number are

the respondents who were in vocational course with the frequency of 6 respondents and percentage of

12 %. The least were the respondents who were in elementary with the frequency of 3 respondents and

percentage of 6%. The table indicates that majority of the respondents who answered the

questionnaires relating to police visibility were from high school in terms of educational attainment.

Table 1.6 Profile of the Respondents According Educational Attainment. (Barangay Cogon Respondents)

Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage (%)

Elementary 0 0
High School 28 56
College 18 36
Vocational 4 8
Total 50 100

Table 1.6 shows that the respondents who were in high school has the greatest number of
frequency (28) and percentage (56%). Secondly, the respondents who were in college have the

frequency of 18 respondents and percentage of 36%. Respondents who were in vocational course have

the lowest number of frequency (4) and percentage (8%). As for the elementary, there was no

respondent at all. The table simply indicates that the respondents who were in high school was the

majority who answered the questionnaires relating to the police visibility in their barangay.

1.7-8 Civil Status

Table 1.7 Profile of the Respondents According to Civil Status. (Barangay Carmen Respondents)

Civil Status Frequency Percentage (%)

Single 17 34
Married 21 42
Divorced 0 0
Widow 2 4
Separated 10 20
Total 50 100

Table 1.7 shows that respondents who are married were the majority who answered the

questionnaires related to the study with the frequency of 21 respondents and percentage of 42%. The

respondents who are single have the frequency of 17 respondents and percentage of 34%. Next are the

respondents who were separated with the frequency of 10 respondents and percentage of 20%. Lastly,

respondents who were divorced have no frequency and percentage at all. This simply indicates that

married respondents were more active in answering the questionnaires related to the study.

Table 1.8 Profile of the Respondents According to Civil Status. (Barangay Cogon Respondents)

Civil Status Frequency Percentage (%)

Single 11 22
Married 24 48
Divorced 0 0
Widow 5 10
Separated 10 20
 Total 50 100
Table 1.8 shows that married respondents are the majority who answered the questionnaires

related to the study with the frequency of 24 respondents and percentage of 48%. The respondents who

were single have the frequency of 11 respondents and percentage of 22%. Next are the respondents

who were separated have the frequency of 10 respondents and percentage of 20%. Lastly, the

respondents who were widow have the frequency of 5 and percentage of 10%. This simply indicates that

respondents who were married have the greatest weight of percentage.

Problem No. 2: What are the police visibility programs of the Philippine National Police?

2.1-2 Conduct of Patrol

Table 2.1 Distribution of the Respondents According to Conduct of Patrol (Barangay Carmen

Respondents)

Conduct of Patrol Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Percentage

Agree Disagree (%)
1. There is high visibility of the 16(32%) 32(64%) 2(4%) 0(0%) 50 (100%)
police on duty in your barangay.
2. There is a presence of police on 24(48%) 19(38%) 7(14%) 0(0%) 50 (100%)
duty in every corner of the
barangay.
3. They are using equipment in 17(34%) 31(62%) 2(4%) 0(0%) 50 (100%)
their conduct of patrol.
4. The police on duty are roaming 18(36%) 27(54%) 5(10%) 0(0%) 50 (100%)
around your barangay.
5. They are conducting patrol 24/7 21(42%) 23(46%) 6(12%) 0(0%) 50 (100%)
in your barangay.

Table 2.1 shows that the majority (32) were saying they agree in the high visibility of the police in

their barangay with the percentage of 64%. In question number two, majority (24) of the respondents

answered strongly agree with the percentage of 48%. For question number three, the majority (31)

answered agree with the percentage of 62%. In question number four, the majority (27) answered agree

with the percentage of 54%. The last question were answered agree by 23 respondents with the
percentage of 46%. This simply indicates that the police in Barangay Carmen need little more

improvement in their conduct of patrol.

Table 2.2 Distribution of the Respondents According to Conduct of Patrol (Barangay Cogon Respondents)

Conduct of Patrol Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Percentage

Agree Disagree (%)
1. There is high visibility of the 23(46%) 20(40%) 7(14%) 0(0%) 50 (100%)
police on duty in your barangay.
2. There is a presence of police on 17(34%) 23(46%) 10(20%) 0(0%) 50 (100%)
duty in every corner of the
barangay.
3. They are using equipment in 19(38%) 18(36%) 13(26%) 0(0%) 50 (100%)
their conduct of patrol.
4. The police on duty are roaming 18(36%) 20(40%) 12(24%) 0(0%) 50 (100%)
around your barangay.
5. They are conducting patrol 24/7 24(48%) 14(28%) 12(24%) 0(0%) 50 (100%)
in your barangay.