P E T R O P H Y S I C A L A N A LY S I S A N D H Y D R O C A R B O N V O L U M E T R I C C A L C U L AT I O N

O N L A K O TA S A N D S T O N E F O R M AT I O N T E A P O T D O M E F I E L D , P O W D E R R I V E R B A S I N ,
W Y O M I N G , U N I T E D S TAT E S O F A M E R I C A
M u h a m m a d R e z a P ut r a
1 1 / 3 1 6 8 4 5 / PA / 1 3 9 6 9

ABSTRACT and below the Lakota Formation to obtain a structural map in the time domain. Time domain conversion to

Petrophysical analysis and hydrocarbon volumetric calculation had been done on the Reservoir depth domain had been performed with a linear equation from checkshot data charts. The calculation of Lakota

Sandstone of Lakota Formation in the Teapot Dome Field, Wyoming, United States. Petrophysical Formation bulk volume was able to used for hydrocarbon volumetric calculation on Lakota Sandstone

parameters have been analyzed are shale volume, porosity, water saturation and permeability. The Formations.

3D seismic data interpretation of Teapot Dome had been correlated with petrophysical analysis in The results showed that the Lakota Formation has an average volume of shale 7.12%, 16.12% effective

order to calculate the volume of hydrocarbon in the Lakota Sandstone Formation. porosity, 38.28% water saturation, 61.72% hydrocarbon saturation and 66.75 mD permeability. These

Petrophysical analysis was performed by Paradigm Geolog 7.0 software. The 3D seismic data parameters indicate that the Lakota Sandstone Formations has a good quality as a reservoars. The volume of

interpretation was started with the Well to Seismic Tie process, picking fault and horizon layers above hydrocarbon in place are obtained from the calculation is 10.6 MMBO.

l i t e r at u r e r e v i e w b a sic t h e o ry
POROSITY WAT E R S AT U R AT I O N
Bateman and Konen (1977) Equa on : Archie’s Equation :
(Asquith and Gibson, 1982)
= +

+ =Water saturation (fraction)

=Formation water resistivity (Wm)

- =True resistivity (Wm)

=Porosity (fraction)
=Total porosity (fraction) =Turtuosity factor (v/v)
=Effective porosity (fraction) =Cementation factor (v/v)
=Bound water volume (fraction) =Exponent saturation (v/v)
=Shale total porosity (fraction) PERMEABILITY
F i g u r e 1 . Te a p o t D o m e  e l d l o c a t i o n F i g u r e 2 . Pe t r o l e u m S y s t e m o f Po w d e r R i v e r B a s i n
( Modicated from Anna, 2009)
=Shale volume (fraction) Wyllie and Rose (1950) Equation :
=Matrices density log value (kg/m3)
=Water density log value (kg/m3)
=Shale density log value (kg/m3)
=Dry shale density log value (kg/m3) =Wyllie and Rose permeability value (mD)
=Wet shale density log value (kg/m ) 3 =Constant
=Effective porosity (fraction)
V O LU M E T R I C C A L C U L AT I O N
=Irrudecible water saturation (fraction)
STOOIP = ACCOUSTIC IMPEDANCE
STOOIP =Stock Tank Originally Oil in Place (barrrel) = r R =
F i g u r e 3 . L a r a m i d e O r o g e n y ( Fo x e t a l . , 1 9 9 1 ) H =Net to Gross (fraction)
VB =Bulk volume (m3) =Accoustic impedance (m/s)(gr/cc)
Figure 4. Geologic Column on area of interest
( Modicated from Anna, 2009) =Effective porosity (fraction) R =Reection coefcient (m/s)(gr/cc)
Sw =Water saturation (fraction) r =Density (gr/cc)
Bo = Oil formation volume factor (rb/stb) =P-wave velocity (m/s)
m et h o d o lo gy
Start
r e s u lt
T O P L A KO TA D E P T H M A P B O T T O M L A KO TA D E P T H M A P
Well data Checkshot Seismic data

Pre-calculation Seismogram sintetic

Bedhole identication No
WST
and normalization

Shale volume N-D crossplot Yes

Picking fault horizon

Porosity Time structural map

Effective porosity Total porosity Domain conversion

Picket plot Depth structural map

Formation water Water

Permeability Bulk volume
resistivity saturation

Lumping Net to gross Net reservoir volume

Hydrocarbon volume
Bo

Finish
F i g u r e 6 . D e p t h S t r u c t u r a l M a p o f L a k o t a Fo r m a t i o n
Figure 5. Flow Chart of the research
Vb (m³) Vb (barrel) NTG (fraction) Phie (fraction) Sh (fraction) Bo (rb/stb) STOOIP (MMBO)
26,040,000 164,052,000 0.80 0.17 0.62 1.30 10.6
conclusion
From the evaluation and calculation performed to the eld data from Lakota Formation, the profile
conclusions can be derived : You can send your opinion, critism, and
Lakota Sandstone had average value of shale volume about 7.12 %, effective porosity about 16.12
1 %, water saturation about 38.28 % and permeability about 66.75 mD.
suggestion about this poster wisely to
muhammadrezaputra25@gmail.com
2 Oil reserve in place from volumetric calculation is 10.6 MMBO.