Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2015
WORL D
Corruption, by definition, implies risk, but in the context of the arms sector, it has a particularly dangerous undertone. Not only does it
waste public funds and threaten the reputation and financial well-being of individual companies, but it can also harm, and indeed claim
lives.
That, however, does not prevent it from happening on a grand scale. According to a new
#link:http://www.transparency.de/English.1222.0.html:Transparency International# (TI) report on the quality of corporate anti-
corruption programs, two-thirds of defense companies fell far short of the mark.
Far from being restricted to any particular region, these companies are based all over the world, from France to Russia, Japan to Finland,
Romania to Singapore, with some countries represented at both ends of the index's six-band scale. The US, by way of example, is a mixed
picture.
"All four companies in the top band are American," TI researcher Leah Wawro said in reference to Bechtel, Fluor, Lockheed Martin and
Raytheon. "But there are also seven US companies in the lowest band," she told DW.
On the upside
Many other US arms manufacturers feature throughout the index, painting a somewhat dubious picture of overall national business
practices in the sector.
"The lack of transparency among some big US companies," Wawro said, "is concerning."
But shady arms deals are by no means confined to the far side of the Atlantic. Several European companies, including four German ones -
Diehl, Rheinmetall, MTU Aero Engines, Krauss-Maffei Wegmann - performed poorly. A fifth, ThyssenKrupp, has made improvements
since the first such index was published in 2012, and now ranks in the top end of the table.
http://www.dw.com/en/the-dangerous-reality-of-corruption-in-the-arms-sector/a-18411848 1/3
8/29/2017 The dangerous reality of corruption in the arms sector | World | DW | 27.04.2015
And that transparency is crucial, because corruption in the defense sector can itself
prove to be a lethal weapon. An underhand procurement contract, for example, can
leave soldiers in the field without the equipment they need to defend themselves and
their country, and that in turn can compromise national security.
He cites the use of sales agents as one of the biggest problems on the road to transparency.
"If a company is selling all over the world but doesn't have offices in every country, they have representatives who know the market and the
customer," Littlewood said. "That makes them reliant on the ethics of the agent, who might do a corrupt deal without the defense company
knowing about it."
He says it is up to manufacturers to make sure they are using decent representatives and that legislation such as the UK's 2011 Bribery Act
is a useful tool in forcing companies to take responsibility for their own choices and decisions.
Unlike previous TI surveys looking at anti-corruption programs in the arms sector, this one asked companies to provide information on
offsets, which Littlewood describes as a "peculiarity of the defense industry."
The practice - which requires companies bidding for national arms contracts to agree to invest in other areas of the importing country's
economy - lends itself to below-board dealings.
"Their bids are measured by what companies propose," the business ethics expert said. As such, a contract might be awarded on the basis
of a weapons manufacturer agreeing to plough money into an unrelated sector in which the buyer, however, has a vested interest. It is very
difficult to track exactly what money goes where and how above-board that is.
Getting clean
Besides the obvious responsibility that individual companies are expected to assume for their arms deals, TI says national governments
have a vital role to play in ensuring defense becomes a corruption-free industry.
"Purchasing governments should require, in policy if possible, all defense companies to have an ethics and anti-corruption program in
place," Wawro said, adding that the same should apply in reverse, and that exporting governments should expect their national defense
companies to operate on an ethical basis. They should hide nothing they don't have to.
http://www.dw.com/en/the-dangerous-reality-of-corruption-in-the-arms-sector/a-18411848 2/3
8/29/2017 The dangerous reality of corruption in the arms sector | World | DW | 27.04.2015
"There tend to be high levels of secrecy in the defense sector," Wawro said. "Sometimes
there are genuine national security concerns that require secrecy, but too often
'national security' can be a veil for corrupt activities."
WWW L I N KS
http://www.transparency.de/English.1222.0.html
Transparency International
companies.defenceindex.org
Defence Companies Anti-Corruption Index
goodcorporation.com
Date 27.04.2015
Keywords arms, defense, TI, Transparency International, Germany, US, report, corruption, anti-corruption
Feedback: Send us an e-mail. Please include your name and country in your reply.
Permalink http://p.dw.com/p/1FFlI
http://www.dw.com/en/the-dangerous-reality-of-corruption-in-the-arms-sector/a-18411848 3/3