Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
95–99
Received 31 August 1998; received in revised form 28 January 1999; accepted 28 January 1999
Abstract
Critical rotation speed of dry ball-mill was studied by experiments and by numerical simulation using Discrete Element Method
ŽDEM.. The results carried out by both methods showed good agreement. It has been commonly accepted that the critical rotation speed
is a function of a ball radius and a jar diameter. The results of the present work, however, show that the critical rotation speed
significantly depends on ball-containing fraction in jars, and approaches a value asymptotically as the ball-containing fraction approaches
to one. This asymptotic value is equal to the traditional critical rotation speed. The effect of individual rotation of the ball of the jar is
significantly small to centrifugal motion. q 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
0032-5910r99r$ - see front matter q 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 3 2 - 5 9 1 0 Ž 9 9 . 0 0 0 3 1 - 5
96 H. Watanaber Powder Technology 104 (1999) 95–99
2. Experiment
smaller ball concentration C as Dd Ž C . A 6C w14x. In our implies that although the configuration of the balls in the
mono-disperse case the concentration C is zero, the diffu- centrifugal resume is simpler than other phenomena of the
sion coefficient Dd is zero. Then, we can think axial ball milling, there is a complexity in the centrifugal mo-
motion insignificantly contributes to the centrifugal mo- tion.
tion. So, we can implement the numerical simulation in the
two-dimensional method. As for ignoring individual rota-
tion of the balls, we could not observe a significant 5. Conclusion
difference between the method that takes into account the
individual rotation of the balls and the method that does In spite of a given inner diameter of jars and ball radius,
not take into account the individual rotation of the balls. In the critical rotation speed of the jar cannot be fixed, and
spite of the insignificant difference, the code is more significantly depends on the ball-containing fraction. The
complicated and a powerful computer resource is needed, model consisting of the simplest collision model, i.e., the
if the influence of individual rotation of the balls is taken it linear-spring-dashpot model and the Coulomb criterion for
into consideration. Then, individual rotation has little con- dynamic friction, numerically represents the experimental
tribution to the centrifugal motion. results well. The value determined by the conventional
Worth considering, Dury and Ristow reported the rela- equation for critical rotation speed is the asymptotic value
tion between the critical rotation speed and the ball-con- as the ball-containing fraction approaches one. The effect
taining fraction. They analytically derived the determinant of individual rotation of the balls is significantly small to
equation in a different definition of the centrifugal motion. centrifugal motion.
Their criterion for determining centrifugal motion reached
is that all balls in the jar form rings. For their critical
rotation speed Nc , the surface area of the ring must be 6. List of symbols
equal to the initial ball-containing fraction at rest that reads
C smaller ball concentration
p Ž R 2 y R 12 . s ap R 2 Ž 10 . D diameter of inner wall of jar
where R 1 stands for the ring’s inner distance from the Dd diffusion coefficient
center of the jar and a denotes the volume filling fraction. en normal restitution coefficient
™
Our ball-containing fraction and his volume-filling fraction F total force vector acting on ball
are the same. Consider the equilibrium of forces between Fn normal force acting ball
the gravitational force and the centrifugal force acting on a Fs shear force acting on ball
single ball of mass m vertically above the jar center. The g gravitational acceleration
equilibrium condition reads hf maximum height of rebounded ball
hi initial height of ball
2
mg s mR1 Ž 2p Nc . . Ž 11 . i suffix of ball number
j suffix of ball number
Let us solve Nc ,
kn stiffness of spring
1 g 1 g mi mass of ball i
Nc s
2p ( R1
s
2p ( R'1 y a
Ž 12 . mj
m eff
mass of ball j
effective mass
is derived w14x. Walton and Braun w15x involved the angle Nc critical rotation speed
™
of repose of material Qc . For more precise expression for n unit vector joining the centers of ball from i to j
critical rotation speed, R radius of the jar
1 g R1 ring’s inner distance from the center of the jar to
Nc s
2p ( R sin Qc'1 y a
Ž 13 .
r
™
the
radius of ball
is given. The difference of definitions on the critical ri center of mass of ball i
™
rotation speed is as follows: in our definition, when the s unit vector perpendicular to ™n
outermost layer of the ball forms a ring, critical rotation tn duration of collision
speed is reached. On the other hand, in his definition, V volume as seen in Fig. 1
™
when all balls form rings, that speed is reached. Our Õi velocity of ball i
approach to the critical rotation speed is from the lower Õs relative tangential velocity
speed, although his approach is from the upper speed. Greek letters
Since there is a difference of definitions, the relations a volume-containing fraction
between the critical rotation speed and the ball-containing b ball-containing fraction
fraction is not unique. The reason why such a phenomenon ln damping constant
occurs is unclear at present. This phenomenon, I think, Dt constant time step in numerical experiment
H. Watanaber Powder Technology 104 (1999) 95–99 99
m coefficient of dynamic fraction w3x S.N. Dorogovtsev, Europhys. Lett. 41 Ž1998. 25.
w4x G. Baumann, I.M. Janosi, D.E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. E 51 Ž1995. 1879.
p the circular constant
w5x H.E. Rose, R.M.E. Sullivan, A Treatise on the Internal Mechanics of
Qc the angle of response of material Ball, Tube and Rod Mills, Constable, London, 1957, pp. 35–68.
j virtual overlap in Eq. Ž4. w6x J. Rajchenbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 Ž1990. 2221.
w7x H. Watanabe, Y. Kondo, Advanced Technology of Materials and
Material Processing Journal ŽATM. 1 Ž1. Ž1998. 1–7.
Acknowledgements w8x J. Shafer, S. Dippel, D.E. Wolf, HLRZ preprint 37r95.
w9x M.P. Allen, D.J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids, Claren-
The author thanks Dr. K. Ishizaki ŽProf., Nagaoka don Press, Oxford, 1997, pp. 82–83.
Univ.. for careful reading of the manuscript and for en- w10x R.M. German, Sintering Theory and Practice, Wiley-Interscience,
couragement, Dr. Y. Kondo ŽDivision of Material, Kagawa New York, 1996, p. 534.
w11x C.M. Dury, G.H. Ristow, cond-matr9805381.
Prefecture Industry Technology Center. for useful sugges- w12x J. Kano, N. Chujo, F. Sato, Advanced Powder Technol. 8 Ž1. Ž1997.
tion and discussions on the experiment and Dr. Y. Oku- 39–51.
moto ŽAnan College of Technology. for preparing hardly w13x S.P. Timoshenko, J.N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill,
available papers. Singapore, 1984, pp. 409–421.
w14x G.H. Ristow, Flow Properties of Granular Materials in Three-Di-
mensional Geometries, Žhabilitation for Philipps University. 1998,
References pp. 63–92.
w15x O.R. Walton, R.L. Braun, in: M. Roco, S. Plasynski ŽEds.., Proceed-
w1x F. Cantelaube, D. Bideau, Europhys. Lett. 30 Ž1995. 133. ings of the joint DOErNFS workshop on Flow of Particulates and
w2x B. Levitan, Physica A 249 Ž1998. 386. Fluids, Ithaca, New York, 1993.