Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Page 1 of 3
TelecomFunda
A unique RF optimization Forum.
FAQ Search
Logout [ amit.telengr ] Points [ 60.00 ] Toplist
Gratitudes User Control Panel
Last visit was: Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:41 am It is currently Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:05 am
Search
View unanswered posts | View active topics View unread posts | View new posts | View your posts
Board index » Wireless Technology » GSM-GPRS-EDGE All times are UTC + 5:30 hours
Forum rules
Please click here to view the forum rules
Subscribe topic | Bookmark topic | Print view | E-mail friend Previous topic | First unread post | Next topic
Author Message
gsm Post subject: FER and BER's the difference? Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:39 am
In voice quality, GSM and CDMA voice coding methods and assessment of different factors, CDMA using FER, GSM use BER, the
Expert Member
conventional field test evaluation can not be unified.Reference communication system common measure of MOS points, you
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010
can feel the voice quality from the perspective of the two united.
5:33 pm
Posts: 115
Cash on hand:
MOS points commonly used evaluation methods including subjective and objective evaluation of MOS MOS sub-sub-evaluation.
2,021.50 Subjective MOS points and using ITU-T P.800 Recommendation P.830, respectively, by different people through the system to
process the original corpus and the corpus after the recession compared to the subjective feeling, come MOS points, and finally
the mean value. MOS and objective evaluation of the use of ITU-T P.862 PESQ method offered by the proposal, by special
equipment (such as Agilent's VQT tester) or software testing.
Table 1 shows the MOS-based sub-standard FER (CDMA) and BER (GSM) the correspondence between:
Table 1 FER and BER comparison of test methods
Attachment:
http://telecomfunda.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=186 12/5/2011
TelecomFunda • View topic - FER and BER's the difference? Page 2 of 3
_________________
If You want more information on this than join our Facebook Group:
Facebook-RF Engineers
LinkedIn-Only Smart RF Engineers 3G 4G
Top
Advertisement
Ads by Google CDMA Network Test Voice Quality GSM
kalutheace Post subject: Re: FER and BER's the difference? Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:12 pm
Hi,
MoS or P.862.1 is a subjective voice quality measurement algorithm that was superseded by PESQ(which is P.862).
NewBie
PESQ. If you wish to see a relationship between MoS/PESQ with FER, it would not be a correct correlation unless one considers
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 only the air interface, as MoS takes into consideration Air interface as well as deterioration at the back haul.
9:13 pm
Posts: 2
Also, FER indicates CRC failures, whereas MOS/PESQ is a 'full reference' algorithm that takes other air interface parameters
Cash on hand: into consideration.
430.00 I think a better comparison will be comparing TEMS Investigation SQI-MoS with PESQ/MoS, as the former is a versatile air
interface parameter modeled looking at PESQ algorithm.
Top
Display posts from previous: All posts Sort by Post time Ascending Go
Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ]
Board index » Wireless Technology » GSM-GPRS-EDGE All times are UTC + 5:30 hours
Who is online
Why we have BSIC & CI?Basic Difference for BSIC & CI in GSM 0 1232
by 9waves.9waves
by 9waves.9waves in GSM-GPRS-EDGE on Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:44 am
http://telecomfunda.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=186 12/5/2011
TelecomFunda • View topic - FER and BER's the difference? Page 3 of 3
http://telecomfunda.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=186 12/5/2011