Integrated Packet Optical Transport

An Optimal Solution for Converging IP Networks

Shaheedul Huq
Solution Sales Manager
Optical Networks
June 7, 2012

1 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

Challenges in the marketplace

PB/Month
180,000
Mobility
+27%
100,000 17x 2008-2020
Growth CAGR IP Apps
2008-2020

20,000
Cloud
1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2021
Source: Juniper, Cisco,
MINTS
Explosive Bandwidth Growth Dynamic and Unpredictable applications

Challenging Business Model Non-scalable architecture

2 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

 CSP’s are forced to improve network efficiency
Data Era changes traditional model Carriers are looking to:
• Increase speed and capacity
• Moving to 100G, thinking about
400G, 1T
• Reduce $/bit:
• CapEx:
• Price erosion
New applications • Optimized architecture
• High bandwidth • OpEx
• “Real –time” • Simplify operation
• Interactive • Converge & consolidate
• Cloud computing • Improve competitiveness and customer
experience
• Service provisioning
End user expectations • QoS
• Instantaneous response • Service availability
• Minimum loading time • Evolution versus revolution

3 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

Today’s IP transport networks are complex, lack
efficiency and scalability

Vendor A Vendor B
Packets

Vendor C Vendor D
Circuits Technology X Technology Y
Vendor E

Technology Z
Vendor B Vendor F
Optical Technology M
Technology Z
Transport

• Multiple layers
• Multiple technologies in Transport layer (SDH/SONET, CES, Metro D/CWDM, OTN, etc)
• Multiple vendors within these layers
• Multiple traffic planes within these vendor environments (Data, Control & Management)

Real Challenge: Scalability and Interworking within & between layers

4 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

Operators want to simplify the network

Reducing layers

IP IP IP IP

OC-3/OC-48 OC-192 /
OC-768
ATM Control
Plane 10G/40G/100G
SDH/MSPP 10/40G (GMPLS/ OTN interfaces
ASON)
SDH/Sonet

Multi-
OADM DWDM/2D Degree ROADM Switch
P<->P DWDM ROADM / OXC

1995 -2000 2000 -2006 2005 -2008 2008 – 20xx

• Reducing SDH/SONET
Moving to OADM, MSPP and reduction of
• Moving to a converged IP/MPLS-
ATM
OTN/DWDM…

IS POTN the ANSWER?

5 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification
The POTN World
Layers (0,1,2,3) Must Converge and Cooperate

0
Optical switching 1
multi-reach DWDM OTN switching for
10/40/100G CDC, flexi- sub-lambda grooming,
grid TDM and cheap
grooming

IP over DWDM with

colored interfaces,
NMS, planning tool and
control plane MPLS-TP switching for
IP transport packet
connectivity fulfilling
transport requirements
3

6 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

How NSN sees the POTN world
Main node architectures

IPoDWDM P-OTS
Transport NMS
Network ODUk switching
Management with native TDM
Coloured interfaces System cross-connection
integrated into IP/MPLS
IP/MPLS Router Ethernet/ ODU
router MPLS switch switch
Integration of router
coloured interfaces into 10/40/100G
DWDM planning tool DWDM NMS 10/40/100G
DWDM

Multi-degree
Pure Packet Switch ROADM/PXC
Multi-degree Fabric for MPLS-TP /
ROADM/PXC Ethernet

POTN is a network either composed by P-OTS (Packet Optical Transport

Systems) or by routers with colored interface integrated to DWDM system
and NMS and control plane (IPoDWDM)

7 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

Packet-Transport integration simplifies the
network and increases efficiency
IP/MPLS over DWDM OTN over DWDM
Virtual layers: Virtual layers:

IP/MPLS control
IP layer IP layer

plane
• Reduced total cost

GMPLS control
MPLS OTN
switching switching layer of ownership (TCO)

plane
layer by 40-65% compared
DWDM layer to traditional
DWDM layer networks

• Increased efficiency
Integrated Packet Transport Network through Multi-Layer
Optimization
OSSIntegrated OSS
• Simplified
operation through
MPLS
Switch common OSS
Multi-layer Optimization
IP Core and interworking
router
Integrated Control Control Planes
IP Edge plane (GMPLS)
router
10/40/100G Opt. OTN Integrated Data
Trans. & Switch switch
plane

Converged SuperCore

8 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

Optimization of DWDM Layer via OTN Aggregation

IP Ethernet TDM BS
Node Network Topology WIN SAF
WIL

Model
electrical Physical Structure YVE ZH SGL
grooming •15 traffic nodes
•25 physical links GE LS BE LZ
NIU
RAP

ODU Traffic Volume BEL LGV CR

grooming •Total Traffic Volume 2007: ~ 50 Tbps
optical (CAGR of 50%)
transport •Total Traffic Volume 2011: > 300 Tbps

40% reduction of wavelength usage by using intermediate

80
ODU level grooming  Capex saving
80
!!!
70 70

60 36.5 60

20.2
wavelengths

wavelengths

50 50

40 40

30 30
STM-64 STM-64
STM-16 STM-16
20 20
10GE->ODU-2 10GE->ODU-2
10 10
1GE->ODU-2 1GE->ODU-2
1GE->ODU-1 1GE->ODU-1
0 0
NIU-RAP

WIN-ZH
CR-NIU

NIU-RAP

WIN-ZH
CR-NIU
NIU-SGL

NIU-SGL
LZ-ZH

RAP-ZH

LZ-ZH

RAP-ZH
LZ-RAP
BE-YVE

BS-WIN

BS-YVE

GE-YVE
LS-YVE
BE-ZH

BS-ZH

SAF-WIN

BE-YVE

BS-YVE

GE-YVE
LS-YVE
LZ-RAP
BS-WIN
BE-ZH

BS-ZH

SAF-WIN
SAF-WIL

SGL-WIL
BE-LZ

SAF-WIL

SGL-WIL
BEL-LZ

BE-LZ

BEL-LZ
CR-LGV

CR-LGV
BE-BS-1
BE-BS-2

BE-LS-1

BE-LS-2

BE-BS-1
BE-BS-2

BE-LS-1

BE-LS-2
GE-LS
BEL-LGV

BEL-LGV

GE-LS
node pair node pair

Source: Thomas Engel, Achim Autenrieth, Jean-Claude Bishoff, “Packet Layer Topologies of Cost Optimized
Transport Networks”, ONDM, Braunschweig, Germany, Feb. 18-20, 2009
9 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification
Optimization of DWDM Layer via OTN & MPLS-TP Integration

CAPEX SAVING OPEX SAVING FOOTPRINT

CAPEX SAVING (%)

80%
50% yearly capacity growth 100% yearly capacity growth
60%

40%

20%
Up to 80% Up to 65% Up to 68%
0%
Off-load factor 50% 70% 90% 50% 70% 90% Core
2010 17% 15% 12% 17% 15% 12%
2011 22% 18% 15% 26% 36% 33%
router
2012 24% 35% 30% 32% 47% 50% Power / CO2
2013 24% 47% 46% 38% 52% 60% IP off-load consumption Floor space
2014 35% 44% 55% 38% 52% 61% with reduction reduction
MPLS-TP
Router off-load factor (%)

European customer example IP core router tranist traffic off-load with P-OTN
switch can result significant savings (*) !
• Yearly capacity growth: 50 and 100%
• IP Transit traffic off load factor: 50%, 70%, 90% • Electricity saving (OPEX)
• Router pipe filling factor: 75% • CO2 cumulative saving during 2010-2014 in
European customer case can be up to 590 tons
• Cumulative CAPEX savings in 2014
• Footprint saving can help on site rental costs and
•50% yoy capacity growth: 55% delaying the needed site expansion investments
•100% yoy capacity growth: 61% (*) Depending of the final configuration

POTS Switching allows significant reduction of IP/MPLS network CAPEX and OPEX!

10 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

Liquid Transport is about flexibility in optical IP networks

Flexible Optics MultiLayer Intelligent Control

Zero-constraint optical Optimization Services in seconds
networking 360° network planning

The right balance The right mix of Highest Greatest Lowest

between layers packet and optical capacity flexibility costs

11 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

The basis for liquidity in optics are advances in
technology
High-speed digital signal processing

Photonic integration
• Enabling 40G, 100G, 400G, 1Tb, flexi-
rate transponder
• Supporting passive optical distribution • Key technology for reducing cost,
network footprint and power
• Enabling >60Tb/s together with new • Si-photonics for integration of optical
fiber technologies and electronic functionality

Advanced ROADM technologies &

architectures

• Ensuring fast service availability,

enabling network flexibility via CDC and
Flexi-grid architectures

12 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

MultiLayer Optimization

70% CAPEX savings

MultiLayer Optimization
Integration of optics and IP 360° network planning

50% less power

consumption

Field-proven tools
consumption
Minimized Latency

Multi-vendor integration

Improved Scalability

13 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

Multilayer optimization
cost-efficient while capacity demands increase

Multi-Layer, multi-technology, multi-vendor, e2e:

• Optimization across layer 1 to 3
• Across all transport technologies: DWDM, OTN, ethernet, MPLS-TP, IP/MPLS, MWR, etc.
• Deliver the required functionaliy at the lowest possible layer
• The lower the layer the lower the cost of service delivery

Improved Efficiency Improved Scalability

Network Optimization Minimize TCO Core router capacity (Tbps)

Required
Cost per bit / power core router
consumption 10 Tbps capacity
IP Routers
Electronic

Packet
MPLS switching

OTN 5 Tbps
Circuit
OTN switching Max. single
Optical

shelf router
WDM capacity

2005 2010 2015 2020

14 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

Intelligent Control

Intelligent control plane Intelligent Control

Services in seconds

Automated path provisioning

Connectivity service
provisioning in near real-time
instead of hours or days

Cross-domain

Multi-vendor

15 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

A truly integrated packet transport network

Data Plane Integration Management Plane Integration

• Direct interconnection of router colored • Single OSS for network
OTN G.709 interface into optical provisioning and operation
transmission • Connection provisioning
• Reducing in station connection, power • Service Management
consumption & footprint Benefits • Fault Management
TCO OPEX
Complexit
y

Resiliency Risks
Control Plane Integration: Multi-Layer Integration &
IP/MPLS & GMPLS Automatio CAPEX Optimization
n

• Robustness against multiple • TransNet for optical

failures planning & automated
• Resilient IP capabilities: Improvement of configuration
service quality, Reduction of • Optical bypass &
maintenance costs electrical grooming
• Dynamic E2E connection provisioning optimally planned

16 © Nokia Siemens Networks Proprietary

Nokia Siemens Networks
Support both POTN node architectures

IP layer and IP layer

Electrical
switching Electrical
layer switching
layer

DWDM
DWDM layer layer

IPoDWDM Packet-Optical Transport System

Juniper – Nokia Siemens Networks Nokia Siemens Networks
Switch/Router hiT 7100
hiT 7300 hiT 7300

TNMS TNMS
TransNet TransNet

17 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification

 Thank You!

18 © Nokia Siemens Networks Document classification