INSTRUMEN/SKALA TENTANG GAYA HIDUP

Perkiraa Data Psychometric (Psychometric

N Nama Jumlah BentukRes
MetodePe nLamany Properties)
o Instrumen/ Isi/Dimensi Pertany pons/Jawab Output/HasilUtamnya Populasi yang sudah menggunakan
ngisian aPengisia Reliabilit Responsivene
. Kuesioner aan an Validity
n y ss
1 Lifestyle Health & Exercise, 42 item Strongly Self, 5-10 Overall LHQ-B by using College student Good - -
. habits Psychological Disagree web-based minutes or normative information to
questionnai Health, Substance Disagree or face-to- less determine cutoff scores for Int. Cons.
re-Brief Use, Nutrition, Neutral face each domain (not using fixed Cronbach
(LHQ-B) Environmental Agree survey cutoff values) categories for α subscale
Concern, Social Strongly LHQ-B (bottom, middle, and = 0,66-
Dinzeo et Concern, Accident, Agree top) are defined by dividing 0,91
al. (2014) Prevention / Safety normative sample data into
and thirds. For example, the lower
Sense of Purpose, Scale range category represents the lowest
: 33% score while the score in
1-5 the top category
representing scores reported
in the top 33%
normative samples This is a
normalized approach to test
score interpretation
(Kaplan 2009)
2 Healthy Dietary Healthy 26 item Never or Self 5-10 Overall HLPCQ 1. Health Philosophy of Dietitians Good Good 285
. Lifestyle Choices, Dietary rarely, Interview minutes or and Its Implicationsfor Life participants
Personal Harm Avoidance, Sometimes, less Satisfaction: An Exploratory Int.Cons. Criterio (92.5%
Control Daily Routine, Often and Study (0.81), Cronbach n response
Questionna Organized Physical Always 2. Patients with mild cognitive α = 0,62- Good rate) delivered
ire Exercise and Social Scale likert impairment (0.81) and 0,81 a completed
(HLPCQ) and Mental Balance. 1-4 3. juvenile adolescents (0.75) questionnaire.

Darviri et al
(2014)

3 Health health 52 item Never, Self 10-20 Overall HPLP-II 1. Relationship between lifestyle Good - -
. Promoting responsibility, sometimes, Interview minutes or factors in rural-urban Japanese
Lifestyle physical activity, often and less population (Cronbach alpha coef- Int.Cons.
Profile nutrition, routinely Less than 0.92) Cronbach
(HPLP-II) spiritual growth, Scale likert 2. Students in china (cronbach alpha α = 0,93
interpersonal 1-4 0.88) subscale
(Tajik et al. relationships, and 3. The influence of lifestyles that internal
2010) stress promotes the health of the quality consistenc
management. of life of retired workers in y
Middle East China's Middle East between
towns (Cronbach's alpha 0.75 and
coefficient for HPLP-II in this 0.83
 sample is 0.93, and for each
subscale (0.70-0.82)
4. Women of childbearing age
(cronbach alpha 0,9 and subskla
0,6-0,9)
5. Buddhist pastor (internal
consistency 0.90)
6. breast cancer (internal consistent
subskala 0.70)
7. coronary artery disease (internal
cons, subscale 0.85-0.88)
8. among middle-aged women in the
general population (cronbach
alpha 0.70-0.87)
9. diabetes risk status: normal, at
risk, high risk, and diabetes (0.93)
10. samples of Taiwanese women
(0.71-073)
11. parents in iran (cronbach alpha
0.78 and subscale 0.64-0.84)
12. Lifestyle health promotion
profile-II: Chinese version of
short form (0.70)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Sumber Kuesioner asli dari LHQ-B :

Nevid, J. S., Rathus, S. A., & Rubenstein, H. (1998). Health in the new millennium. New York, NY: Worth. Norcross, J. C., Krebs, P. M., & Prochaska, J. O.
(2011). Stages of change. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 143–154. doi:10.1002/jclp.20758.

Sumber jurnal dari kuesioner LHQ-B yang dipakai :

Dinzeo, T. J., Thayasivam, U., & Sledjeski, E. M. (2014). The development of the lifestyle and habits questionnaire-brief version: Relationship to quality of life
and stress in college students. Prevention science, 15(1), 103-114.

kutipan dari text untuk output/hasil utamanya dari LHQ-B :

Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2009). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (7th ed.). Belmont, CA:Thomson Wadsworth.

2. Sumber jurnal kuesioner dari HLPCQ yang dipakai :

Darviri, C., Alexopoulos, E. C., Artemiadis, A. K., Tigani, X., Kraniotou, C., Darvyri, P., & Chrousos, G. P. (2014). The Healthy Lifestyle and Personal Control
Questionnaire (HLPCQ): a novel tool for assessing self-empowerment through a constellation of daily activities. BMC public health, 14(1), 995.
 Sumber Populasi yang menggunakan dari HLPCQ :

1. Grace-Farfaglia, P., Pickett-Bernard, D., White Gorman, A., & Dehpahlavan, J. (2017). Health Philosophy of Dietitians and Its Implications for Life
Satisfaction: An Exploratory Study. Behavioral Sciences, 7(4), 67.
2. Darviri, C., Zavitsanou, C., Delikou, A., Giotaki, A., Artemiadis, A., Terentiou, A., & Chrousos, G. P. (2016). A Novel Non-Pharmaceutical Treatment
for Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Psychology, 7(5).
3. Tamanal, J. M., Park, K. E., & Kim, C. H. (2017). The relationship of perceived stress and lifestyle choices among Filipino adolescents

3. Sumber jurnal kuesioner asli dari HPLP-II :

Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The health-promoting lifestyle profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs Res. 1987;36(2):76–81.
doi:10.1097/00006199-198703000-00002.

Sumber jurnal dari kuesioner HPLP-II yang dipakai :

Tajik, M., Galvão, H. M., & Siqueira, C. E. (2010). Health survey instrument development through a community-based participatory research approach: Health
promoting lifestyle profile (HPLP-II) and Brazilian immigrants in Greater Boston. Journal of immigrant and minority health, 12(3), 390-397.
Sumber Populasi yang menggunakan dari HPLP-II :

1. Zhang, S. C., Wei, C. N., Harada, K., Ueda, K., Fukumoto, K., Matsuo, H., ... & Fang, J. (2013). Relationship between lifestyle and lifestyle-related factors in a
rural–urban population of Japan. Environmental health and preventive medicine, 18(4), 267-274.
2. Lolokote, S., Hidru, T. H., & Li, X. (2017). Do socio-cultural factors influence college students’ self-rated health status and health-promoting lifestyles? A cross-
sectional multicenter study in Dalian, China. BMC public health, 17(1), 478.
3. Zhang, S. C., Wei, C. N., Harada, K., Ueda, K., Fukumoto, K., Matsuo, H., ... & Fang, J. (2013). Relationship between lifestyle and lifestyle-related factors in a
rural–urban population of Japan. Environmental health and preventive medicine, 18(4), 267-274.
4. Baheiraei, A., Mirghafourvand, M., Charandabi, S. M. A., Mohammadi, E., & Nedjat, S. (2014). Health-promoting behaviors and social support in Iranian
women of reproductive age: a sequential explanatory mixed methods study. International journal of public health, 59(3), 465-473.
5. Ohnishi, J., Ayuzawa, S., Nakamura, S., Sakamoto, S., Hori, M., Sasaoka, T., ... & Murakami, K. (2017). Distinct transcriptional and metabolic profiles
associated with empathy in Buddhist priests: a pilot study. Human genomics, 11(1), 21.
6. Khazaee-Pool, M., Majlessi, F., Montazeri, A., Pashaei, T., Gholami, A., & Ponnet, K. (2016). Development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to
measure factors influencing women’s breast cancer prevention behaviors (ASSISTS). BMC women's health, 16(1), 40.
7. Leung, Y. W., Ceccato, N., Stewart, D. E., & Grace, S. L. (2007). A prospective examination of patterns and correlates of exercise maintenance in coronary
artery disease patients. Journal of behavioral medicine, 30(5), 411-421.
8. Tsuboi, S., Hayakawa, T., Kanda, H., & Fukushima, T. (2009). The relationship between clustering health-promoting components of lifestyle and bone status
among middle-aged women in a general population. Environmental health and preventive medicine, 14(5), 292-298.
9. Sutherland, L. L., Weiler, D. M., Bond, L., Simonson, S., & Reis, J. (2012). Northwest Latinos’ health promotion lifestyle profiles according to diabetes risk
status. Journal of immigrant and minority health, 14(6), 999-1005.
10. Meihan, L., & Chung-Ngok, W. (2011). Validation of the psychometric properties of the health-promoting lifestyle profile in a sample of Taiwanese
women. Quality of Life Research, 20(4), 523-528
11. Tanjani, P. T., Azadbakht, M., Garmaroudi, G., Sahaf, R., & Fekrizadeh, Z. (2016). Validity and reliability of health promoting lifestyle profile II in the Iranian
elderly. International journal of preventive medicine, 7.
12. Teng, H. L., Yen, M., & Fetzer, S. (2010). Health promotion lifestyle profile‐II: Chinese version short form. Journal of advanced nursing, 66(8), 1864-1873.
 INSTRUMEN/SKALA TENTANG TINGKAT STREES
Data Psychometric (Psychometric
Nama
N JumlahPertany BentukRespo MetodePengisi PerkiraanLam Output/Has Populasi yang Properties)
Instrumen/ Isi/Dimensi
o. aan ns/Jawaban an anyaPengisian ilUtamnya sudahmenggunakan Reliabilit
Kuesioner Validity Responsiveness
y
1. Perceived Harrassment 30 item Almost never Self, or 5-10 minutes or Overall PSQ 1. population based surveys Good - -
stress Overload Sometimes Interview less of the greek version
questionnai Irritability Lack Often method (consistency using Int. Cons.
re (PSQ) of joy Fatigue Usually Pearson correlation Cronbach
Worries (1-4) coefficient r equal to r = α = 0,9
(Levenstei Tension 0.86 and PSQ has test-retest
satisfactory construct 0,82
n, 1993) validity)
2. bone and muscle pain in
adolescents (cronbach
alpha 0.90)
3. Clinical and healthy adult
samples (cronbach alpha
0.80-0.85 subgroup 0.70
and Construct Validity
correlated with
WHOQOL-Bref and
TICS)
4. stress work in young
adults less than 5 years
working experience
(cronbach alpha 0.88 and
subscales 0.74-0.84)
2. Perceived to measure a 10 item Never, almost self or 5-10 minutes or Overall 1. Student: (cronbach alpha Good Crit : N/A 941 responders
stress scale global level of never, interview less CPSS with 0.78) and criteria of (55% response
(PSS) perceived stress sometimes, method establishedc validity: Other measures Int.Cons. rate) completed
fairly often, ut offs of stress assessment: Cronbach the
Lee, E.H. and very often Total scores Medium correlated weak, α = 0,74- questionnaires
(2012). (0-4) (0-40) N / A, Cohen & 0,91
Williamson (1988)
2. Adults, Chronically ill
parents, children,
substance abusers,
healthyundergraduate
students, and HIV-
positive patients:
(cronbach alpha 0.82) and
translation and reverse
translation, Remor (2006)
3. Undergraduate students:
(cronbach alpha 0.89) and
N / A, Roberti,
Harrington, & Storch
(2006)
4. Patien psychiatry:
(cronbach alpha 0,91) and
 criteria validity: MOS-
SF36:The mental
component (r = 0.70),
physical component (r =
0.21), N / AMitchell,
Crane, & Kim (2008)
5. University students:
(Cronbach alpha 0.84)
Translation and
translation back Örücü &
Demir (2009)
6. Teacher: (cronbach alpha
0.87) Translation and
translation of Reis, Hino,
& Rodriguez-Añez (2010)
7. Heart patients who
smoke: (cronbach alpha
0.83) Leung, Lam, &
Chan (2010)
8. Adults, medical students,
and patients: (cronbach
alpha 0.80-0.84)
Translation and
translation back,
Wongpakaran &
Wongpakaran (2010)
9. Pregnant women,
students, and postpartum:
(cronbach alpha 0.74)
translation and reverse
translation, Chaaya,
Osman, Naassan, &
Mahfoud (2010)
10. Adults (recruited from the
words hospital, finance or
tax office, university):
(cronbach alpha 0.82),
translation and translation
back Andreou et al.
(2011)
11. Polwan: (cronbach alpha
0.86), translation and
translation back, Wang et
al. (2011)
12. worker: (cronbach alpha
0.83), Previously the
French translation
Lesage, Weed, &
Deschamps (2012)
13. hinese version (cronbach
alpha 0.67-0.78)
14. japanese version
 (cronbach alpha 0.84-
0,86)
15. french version (cronbach
alpha 0.73-0.84)

3. General For 12 item Better than Self Interview 5 minutes or Overall 1. The Spanish population Alpha on the From the data
health psychological usual, method less GHQ (cronbach alpha 0.76 and Cronbach validity collection of
Questionnai distress distress The same as alpha standard 0.78) and Alpha test in iran KK, obtained
re (GHQ) and social usual, 2. Psychological Health of Cronbach the result 501 people who
disfunse Less than Malaysian Students test and that the meet the study
Idaiani, usual, and (cronbach alpha 0.70) retest GHQ-12 criteria. Of the
greatly 3. Elderly Worker in Japan methods questionn 501 people,
S., & reduced than 4. study population in obtained aire has a only 440 were
Suhardi, usual Kanazawa, Japan ranged good, successfully
S. (2006) Skala likert 5. Iranian version validation from reliable visited and
0-3 studies (cronbach alpha 0.670 - and valid filled out the
0.87 and Research 0.776 (> structure questionnaires.
findings indicate that the 0.600) to assess A total of 61
Iranian version of GHQ- the people were
12 has the good of psycholog unsuccessfully
structural characteristics ical status visited and
and is a reliable and valid of the filled out
instrument that can be communit questionnaires
used for psychological y by moving, out
well-being measurements of town,
in Iran) suffering from
6. Diagnose mental illness in
disorders in primary care hospital for a
(that SCL-90-R long time or
subcategory `` unwilling to
restlessness '' and `` follow the
depression '' indicates research on the
acceptable concurrent grounds of
validity for the diagnostic busyness and so
group of anxiety and forth.
depression (according to
DSM-III-R).
7. The factor structure of the
GHQ-12 General Health
Questionnaire.

1. Sumber jurnal kuesioner dari PSQ yang dipakai :

Levenstein, S., Prantera, C., Varvo, V., Scribano, M. L., Berto, E., Luzi, C., & Andreoli, A. (1993). Development of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: a new
tool for psychosomatic research. Journal of psychosomatic research, 37(1), 19-32.
Sumber populasi yang menggunakan Dari PSS :
 1. Karatza, E., Kourou, D., Galanakis, M., Varvogli, L., & Darviri, C. (2014). Validation of the greek version of perceived stress questionnaire:
Psychometric properties and factor structure in a population-based survey. Psychology, 5(10), 1268.
2. Østerås, B., Sigmundsson, H., & Haga, M. (2015). Perceived stress and musculoskeletal pain are prevalent and significantly associated in
adolescents: an epidemiological cross-sectional study. BMC public health, 15(1), 1081.
3. Fliege, H., Rose, M., Arck, P., Walter, O. B., Kocalevent, R. D., Weber, C., & Klapp, B. F. (2005). The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ)
reconsidered: validation and reference values from different clinical and healthy adult samples. Psychosomatic medicine, 67(1), 78-88.
4. Xiong, B., Skitmore, M., & Xia, B. (2014). Exploring the internal dimensions of work stress: evidence from construction cost estimators in China.
In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ARCOM Conference (pp. 321-329). Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM).

2. Sumber asli kuesioner dari PSS :

Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of health and social behavior, 385-396.

Sumber jurnal kuesioner dari PSS yang dipakai :

Lee, E. H. (2012). Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Asian nursing research, 6(4), 121-127.

kutipan dari text untuk responsivness dari PSS :

Lyrakos, G.N.; Arvaniti, C.; Smyrnioti, M.; Kostopanagiotou, G. Translation and validation studyof the depression anxiety stress scale in the greek general
population and in a psychiatric patient’s sample. Eur. Psychiatry 2011, 26, 1731; doi:10.1016/S0924-9338(11)73435-6.

Sumber kutipan jurnal untuk responsivness dari PSS :

Andreou, E., Alexopoulos, E. C., Lionis, C., Varvogli, L., Gnardellis, C., Chrousos, G. P., & Darviri, C. (2011). Perceived stress scale: reliability and validity
study in Greece. International journal of environmental research and public health, 8(8), 3287-3298.

Sumber Populasi yang menggunakan dari PSS :

1. Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan, & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social
psychology of health: Claremont symposium on applied social psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Remor, E. (2006). Psychometric properties of a European Spain version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The Spanish Journal of Psychology,
9, 86e93.
3. Roberti, J.W., Harrington, L. N., & Storch, E. A. (2006). Further psychometric support for the 10-item version of the perceived stress scale. Journal
of Counseling Association, 9, 135e147.
4. Mitchell, A. M., Crane, P., & Kim, Y. (2008). Perceived stress in survivors of suicide: Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale.
Research in Nursing and Health, 31, 576e585.
5. Örücü, M. C., & Demir, A. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of perceived stress scale for Turkish university students. Stress and Health, 25,
103e109.
 6. Reis, R. S., Hino, A. A. F., & Rodriguez-Añez, C. R. (2010). Perceived stress scale: Reliability and validity study in Brazil. Journal of Health
Psychology, 15, 107e114.
7. Leung, D. Y., Lam, T., & Chan, S. S. (2010). Three versions of perceived stress scale: Validation in a sample of Chinese cardiac patients who
smoke. BioMed Central Public Health, 10, 513.
8. Wongpakaran, N., & Wongpakaran, T. (2010). The Thai version of the perceived stress scale (PSS-10): An investigation of its psychometric
properties. Biopsychosocial Medicine, 4, 1e6.
9. Chaaya, M., Osman, H., Naassan, G., & Mahfoud, Z. (2010). Validation of the Arabic version of the Cohen perceived stress scale (PSS-10) among
pregnant and postpartum women. BioMed Central Psychiatry, 10, 111.
10. Andreou, E., Alexopoulos, E. C., Lionis, C., Varvogli, L., Gnardellis, C., Chrousos, G. P., et al. (2011). Perceived stress scale: Reliability and
validity study in Greece. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8, 3287e3298.
11. Wang, Z., Chen, J., Boyd, J. E., Zhang, H., Jia, X., Qiu, J., et al. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the perceived stress
scale in policewomen. Public Library of Science ONE, 6, e28610.
12. Lesage, F., Berjot, S., & Deschamps, F. (2012). Psychometric properties of the French versions of the perceived stress scale. International journal
of Occupational Medicine, 25, 178e184.
13. Ng, S. M. (2013). Validation of the 10-item Chinese perceived stress scale in elderly service workers: one-factor versus two-factor structure. BMC
psychology, 1(1), 9.
14. Mimura, C., & Griffiths, P. (2008). A Japanese version of the Perceived Stress Scale: cross-cultural translation and equivalence assessment. BMC
psychiatry, 8(1), 85.
15. Lesage, F. X., Berjot, S., & Deschamps, F. (2012). Psychometric properties of the French versions of the Perceived Stress Scale. International
journal of occupational medicine and environmental health, 25(2), 178-184.

Sumber Jurnal asli kutipan untuk populasi yg menggunakan dari PSS :

Lee, E. H. (2012). Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Asian nursing research, 6(4), 121-127.

3. sumber kuesioner asli dari GHQ :

Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire: A technique for the identification and assessment of non-psychotic psychiatric
illness. London, New York: Oxford University Press.

Sumber jurnal kuesioner yang dipakai dari GHQ :

Idaiani, S., & Suhardi, S. (2006). Validitas dan reliabilitas General Health Questionnaire untuk skrining distres psikologik dan disfungsi sosial di
masyarakat. Buletin Penelitian Kesehatan, 34(4 Des).

kutipan test untuk validity dari GHQ :

Montazeri, A., Harirchi, A. M., Shariati, M., Garmaroudi, G., Ebadi, M., & Fateh, A. (2003). The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): translation
and validation study of the Iranian version. Health and quality of life outcomes, 1(1), 66.

sumber populasi yg menggunakan dari GHQ :

1. Sánchez-López, M. D. P., & Dresch, V. (2008). The 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): reliability, external validity and factor
structure in the Spanish population. Psicothema, 20(4).
2. Zulkefly, S. N., & Baharudin, R. (2010). Using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) to assess the psychological health of
Malaysian college students. Global Journal of Health Science, 2(1), 73.
3. Matsuzaki, I., Sagara, T., Ohshita, Y., Nagase, H., Ogino, K., Eboshida, A., ... & Nakamura, H. (2007). Psychological factors including sense of
coherence and some lifestyles are related to general health questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) in elderly workers in Japan. Environmental Health and
Preventive Medicine, 12(2), 71-77.
4. Hori, D., Tsujiguchi, H., Kambayashi, Y., Hamagishi, T., Kitaoka, M., Mitoma, J., ... & Hibino, Y. (2016). The associations between lifestyles and
mental health using the General Health Questionnaire 12-items are different dependently on age and sex: a population-based cross-sectional
study in Kanazawa, Japan. Environmental health and preventive medicine, 21(6), 410-421.
5. Montazeri, A., Harirchi, A. M., Shariati, M., Garmaroudi, G., Ebadi, M., & Fateh, A. (2003). The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12):
translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Health and quality of life outcomes, 1(1), 66.
6. Schmitz, N., Kruse, J., Heckrath, C., Alberti, L., & Tress, W. (1999). Diagnosing mental disorders in primary care: the General Health Questionnaire
(GHQ) and the Symptom Check List (SCL-90-R) as screening instruments. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 34(7), 360-366.
7. Ye, S. (2009). Factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): The role of wording effects. Personality and Individual
Differences, 46(2), 197-201.