Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
LYNN LACEY )
Plaintiff, )
v. ) 2:18-cv-10156
) Hon.
TIM HORTON'S-SOUTHGATE, )
JANE DOE and JANE DOE # 2, )
Defendants, )
Defendants.
ROBERT H. ROETHER (P19560)
Attorney for Plaintiff
525 East Michigan Avenue, #336
Saline, MI 48176-1588
313-565-4733 FAX: 313-447-2274
roetherlaw@hotmail.com
__________________________________________________
2. Defendant, Jane Doe is a person whose identity is unknown but who, on October 7, 2017,
was working at the Tim Horton's restaurant at 16801 Fort Street, Southgate, Wayne County, Michigan
48195. She was working at the "drive through" window. She handed the cup of tea that is the subject of
this Complaint to plaintiff’s companion. Her residency and citizenship are unknown.
3. Defendant, Jane Doe #2, is a person whose identity is unknown, but who on October 7,
2017, was working at the Tim Horton's restaurant at 16801 Fort Street, Southgate, Michigan 48195. Jane
Does #2 poured the cup of tea that is the subject matter of this Complaint, then passed it to Jane Doe.
1
4:18-cv-10156-MFL-SDD Doc # 1 Filed 01/12/18 Pg 2 of 4 Pg ID 2
16801 Fort Street, Southgate, Michigan. Defendant is believed to be a citizen of Wayne County,
Michigan. Plaintiff, through her lawyer has communicated with Tim Horton's, in part to determine the
proper corporate identity responsible for the business of Tim Horton's located at 16801 Fort Street,
Southgate, Michigan 48195. Defendant never responded to plaintiff's multiple inquiries. There are
multiple corporations simultaneously doing business at this location, including but not limited to:
Defendant's registered agent is John G. McNally, 140 St. Joseph, Trenton, Michigan 48183.
5. All events complained of took place in Southgate, Michigan. The amount in controversy
exceeds $75,000.00. There is diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 1332(a)(2) and venue is proper
6. All events complained of took place in Wayne County, Michigan and the amount in
was a business invitee and entitled to all the protection Michigan law extends to such persons.
8. Plaintiff was in her motor vehicle in the "drive through lane." She was a passenger, the
driver was Anthony Caruso, a close friend of plaintiff. Anthony Caruso ordered coffee (for himself) and
an extra-large tea (for Lynn ) from Jane Doe. Jane Doe #2 poured the tea using the cup that is depicted as
"EXHIBIT 1." The cup Jane Doe #2 selected had a portion of its upper rim "mashed down" making it a
defective cup.
9. Jane Doe #2 put a lid on the visibly defective cup and passed it to Jane Doe who, in turn,
2
4:18-cv-10156-MFL-SDD Doc # 1 Filed 01/12/18 Pg 3 of 4 Pg ID 3
handed it to Anthony Caruso. Since the lid was mashed down, it didn't form a tight seal with the lid and
as plaintiff took the cup from Anthony Caruso, the lid popped off and fell to the floor pouring hot tea
from the cup onto the front of plaintiff's body, burning her severely.
10. Defendants failed to warn plaintiff they were handing her a defective cup with an
unsecured lid.
11. Such actions on the part of defendants were negligent and/or grossly negligent.
12. As a direct and proximate result of defendants' conduct, plaintiff was severely burned
sustaining first and second degree burns to her left anterior thigh, left lower abdominal wall, and left
13. As a direct and proximate result of defendants' conduct, plaintiff sustained pain and
suffering, disfigurement, medical expenses and treatment, therapy, income loss, embarrassment,
by a jury but at least $75,000, plus costs, interest and attorney fees.
Respectfully submitted,
JURY DEMAND
Respectfully submitted,
3
4:18-cv-10156-MFL-SDD Doc # 1 Filed 01/12/18 Pg 4 of 4 Pg ID 4