Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SW
4 Zoning Analysis
Ad
5 Existing Site Analysis
mi
Terminal 5
ral
Shmitz Preserve 6 EDG Preferred Options
Wa
Park
California Ave. SW
7 Proposed Site Plan
y
tt l e B r i d ge
ea
DESIGN PROPOSAL
S
t
Wes
SW Charleston St. 10 Project in Context
11 Design Inspiration
12 Design Concept
13 Elevations & Materiality
18 Street Experience
26 Addressing Blank Facade -
ALASKA
SITE 27 Landscape Palette
JUNCTION
30 Lighting Plan
W
S
a 31
y
Signage Concept
SW Alaska St. Fauntleroy W
Puget Sound
APPENDIX
38 Floor Plans
40 Building Sections
42 Shadow Studies
Project Address 4417 42nd Avenue SW Zoning NC2-40 The proposed building is a 4-story apartment building, located
Seattle, WA 98116 on 42nd Ave SW, mid-block between SW Oregon St and
Neighborhood West Seattle SW Genesse St. The project is across the West Seattle
SDCI Project # 3026661
Christian Church and in close proximity to the Holy Rosary
Lot Size 11,500 SF
Owner Junction Landing, LLC Catholic Church and shares the alley with the USPS California
P.O. Box 16489 Square Footage ± 32,600 SF FAR Area, Ave branch.
Seattle, WA 98116 ± 47,000 SF Total Building Area
SITE
2 masonry, and concrete. For apartment buildings articulation of their facades
including recessed entries with canopies and large punched windows along
major thoroughfares. To relate to the existing buildngs along the junction and
4 the churches the use of brick on the proposed building will help integrate into
the neighborhood. The right of way along 42nd ave sw creates a opportunity
3 for lush landscaping. Planting to frame commercial entries and protect
residential privacy.
C O N T E X T & S I T E A N A LY S I S
NC3 LR3
NC2 LR2/1
NC1 SF5000
The project site is located within the West Seattle Junction Hub
Urban Village, and only 1.75 blocks to the northeast of the
intersection of California Ave SW and SW Alaska St.
TREE #17: EXCEPTIONAL TREE See Landscape proposal in this packet for tree canopy
25” GRAND FIR replacement strategy.
CONS
·· East and West dominated units which is different modu-
lation than the existing context to capture views
REQUESTED DEPARTURES
·· 20% slope for garage ramp
UNIT UNIT
LOBBY
PARKING
PARKING
TRAFFIC & CIRCULATION
ADJ. ADJACENT
42nd Ave is not classified as an arterial or a transit BLDG. BUILDING 14’ - 0”
street, but is parallel to California Ave which is a Major REQUIRED
CLEARANCE @ L4
Transit Street and a bicycle path. The proposal will allow 113’ - 0”
for pedestrian path along its East portion of the site. The 2’ - 0” 36’ - 0” 32’ - 0” 38’ - 6” 6’ - 6”
eastern portion of the site will be scaled accordingly to
the pedestrian scale. The trash and vehicluar access will
16’ - 4” 1’ - 7”
3’ - 10”
design guidelines.
RAMP DOWN TO GARAGE
WORKOUT
ROOM
STREETSCAPE
The proposal proposes live/work units along 42nd ave, REFUSE LEASING
allowing an opportunity for residential and future retail
once the Junction develops even more in the near future. ADJACENT
The proposed vehicular entry/exit will have clear sight BUILDING
lines to provide vehicles that are entering and exiting
42ND AVE SW
91’ - 7”
the proposed builings opportunties to see other vehicles
75’ - 5”
98’ - 4”
80’ - 0” ROW
LOBBY + MAIL
99’ - 6”
going through the alley.
LIVE-WORK
EXISTING
PARKING LOT UNITS
5’ - 0”
4’ - 1”
UNIT BUILDING ENTRY POINT
AMENITY +
BUILDING
UTILITY/STORAGE/
CIRCULATION
BICYCLE ACCESS 6’ - 0”
REFUSE
2’ - 0” 36’ - 0” 45’ - 1” 31’ - 11” 9’ - 0” 9’ - 0”
OVERHEAD POWER LINE 40’ - 1 1/2”
113’ - 0”
TO CL OF ROW
PARKING RAMP EXISTING PARKING LOT
8 JUNCTION LANDING | #3026661 | DESIGN REVIEW RECOMMENDATION NICHOLSON KOVALCHICK ARCHITECTS
Approach from 42nd Ave SW
SMALL PUNCHED WINDOWS BRICK PATTERN STEPPED BACK UPPER LEVEL WINDOWS IN BRICK
MATERIAL LANGUAGE
7
7
6 1 3 3 1 8
10
4 4 4 4
5 1
7 7
1 1
9 9
6 3
6 10 3
5 5 5
1
9
10
2
6
1
1 1
3 6 6
CS2-D
CS1-D PL3-B
STREET EXPERIENCE
CS1-D
DC4-B
DC4-A
DC4-D
DC4-B Signage
The residential building signage is the main focus of the project. The live work units
have the choice to add their own blade signage below the canopy in front of their
respective entries. A simple and understated signage is most suitable in this quiet
residential neighboorhood.
CS1-B
DC2-B
CS3-A
CS2-D
DC1-C DC1-B
CS1-B Sunlight and Natural Ventilation DC1-B Vehicular Access and Circulation
Northwest corner of the building is significantly setback to allow more light into the Access to the basement parking is through the alley, where pedestrian presence is
backyard of the neighbors to the north already minimal. In order to minimize any conflicts and increase safety, the entry
DC1-C ramp starts with a gentle transition to allow motorists to pause and observe the
right of way prior to exiting. The guardrail over a short concrete wall separating
CS2-D Height, Bulk and Scale
the ramp from the neighbor to the north provides the required privady and plent of
Northwest corner of the building is significantly setback to allow more light into the
visual connections for safety of traffic and pedestrians.
backyard of the neighbors to the north
CS2-D
DC2-B
CS3-A
PREFERRED OPTION - HARDIE PANEL AT BUMP OUTS MATERIAL STUDY 1 - METAL PANELS WRAP CORNERS MATERIAL STUDY 2 - METAL PANEL CHECKBOARD
PREFERRED OPTION - HARDIE PANEL AT BUMP OUTS MATERIAL STUDY 1 - METAL PANELS WRAP CORNERS MATERIAL STUDY 2 - METAL PANEL CHECKBOARD
TREES
VINES
SHRUBS
GROUND COVERS
MIN. 9’-0”
OF LANDSCAPING
BUFFER
EXCEPTIONAL TREES
acer circinatum (# in reference to table of trees inventory by tree solutions date of inventory 03.03.2017)
(vine maple)
1.5” CAL # Canopy area
17 530 sf
(2) malus fusca 18 380 sf
(oregon crab tree) 22 2,123 sf
1.5” CAL Total 3,033 sf
THOMAS RENGSTORF
AND ASSOCIATES
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
SITE PLANNING
URBAN DESIGN
JUNCTION LANDING
LANDSCAPE
JUNCTION LANDING | #3026661 | DESIGN REVIEW RECOMMENDATION RENDERED
NICHOLSON KOVALCHICK PLAN
ARCHITECTS 25
LEVEL ROOF
Lighting Plan
WALL PACKS
RECESSED DOWNLIGHT
42ND AVE SW
ALLEY
CANOPY DOWNLIGHT
WALL SCONCE
23.54.030.D.3 Driveway slope for all uses. No portion With shallow and relatively flat site, in order to provide clear- 20% • Dc1 - project uses and activities: a: visual impacts of
of a driveway shall exceed a slope ance for an accessible van utilizing a steeper ramp of 20% for parking sturcture - being able to fully bury the parking
of 15%. The director may permit a 54 feet allows for parking clearance while allowing the build- garage will allow the building to not be broken giving
driveway slope of more than 15%. ing to occupy the majority of the site. It will allow the parking a more pleasant visual from 42nd ave.
garage to be enveloped by the building design that will meet • Dc2 - architectural concepts:a: architectural concepts
and consistency: burying the garage will allow for the
the design guidelines and not become a feature. The garage
facade to be consistent and allow for higer quality of
won’t be visible from 42nd ave and will allow parking for materials along 42nd.
residents. 20% Will be the least amount to provide accessibil-
ity and clearance into the garage
The private bedroom area opens to the work space. This way the
space can be made private or made to spill into the workspace.
42ND AVE SW - STREET FACING FACADE
The example below show how the the space can be highly
adaptable to the needs of a tenant that wishes to convert the
space into a simple home office and still provide privacy to their
personal live space or become part of the work space as well.
MEETING OFFICE
ROOM
A. The Board favored the proposed massing of Option 3, the A. The Board was receptive to the removal off all three Exceptional trees A. The Board pointed to the number of bays on the street side of the
applicant’s preferred option, due to the major moves in massing and how on the site however they wanted to see further development of the landscape building and upper level setbacks that need further study to provide better
they relate well to the neighborhood development. The Board also noted that plan and how it creates a viable rooftop habitat. The Board requested the connection of the bays to the massing of the building. The Board thought
Option 3 pushes the mass of the building to the south property line, allowing landscape plan include specific details on the tree species proposed, size of the 42nd Avenue façade will need more work before the recommendation
more light into the backyard of the residence to the north. (CS2-D) the trees at planting, especially on the rooftop amenity space, to convince meeting.
the Board that removing all three Exceptional trees is appropriate due to the (DC2-B)
B. The Board requested minor massing refinements with Option 3 when proposed diversity of landscaping proposed. (DC4-D, CS1-D)
it returns to the Board at the Recommendation phase. The minor massing B. The Board stated that they struggled to find an overarching design
refinements noted by the Board include the use of bays along the 42nd MUP Response: We are proposing landscaping on all sides of the project concept to drive the design forward. The Board suggested the applicant
Ave façade, how could they be integrated better with the building, and site to soften the transition between properties. The main elevation facing explore connecting the bays and building articulation in a way that provides a
providing the opportunity for more daylighting to the residence to the north. 42nd Ave SW will be lush with new street trees. The alley side will also design that is simplified and clear in design intent. (DC2-B)
The Board would like the applicant to demonstrate, through sketches and have planters below the windows of units and provide privacy and
iterative images, how the refinements have taken shape from the early design greenery on the alleyway. The small courtyard to the south will provide MUP Response: We have refined the elevation facing 42nd Avenue and
guidance meeting to the recommendation meeting. (CS2-West Seattle) relief and a break in the overall massing and house a required bio rationalized the layout through a play of figure and ground by using brick
retention planter. Landscape and Civil have worked together to propose and metal panel. We have also studied how the proportions and symmetry
MUP Response: Minor massing adjustments were studied together with the not only a feasible drainage and storm water system that will fulfill the would play between each material but also the scale of the project.
materiality of the building to bring cohesiveness to the proposed project. strict requirement of the code, but also introduced a rich palette of native
We have strengthened the presence of the bays on the main elevation planting all around and in the rooftop deck.
facing 42nd Ave SW with a play of figure and ground as well as symmetry.
C. Acknowledging public concern, the Board requested the applicant A. Acknowledging public concern, the Board would like to review A. The Board requested detailed information on the four live/work units
further study the north and south façades and how they could provide additional information on the driveway access including a design for the proposed along 42nd Avenue at the Recommendation phase. The Board will
articulation, colors and/or texture to avoid a large blank façade, especially fencing/railing being considered for safety purposes and be very interested in reviewing the layout and functionality of these units and
to the neighboring property on the north side of the project site. (CS2-West how this will be aesthetically pleasing to the neighboring property. (DC1-B) how they will relate to the neighborhood and help to activate the streetscape.
Seattle, CS3-A) (PL3-B)
B. The Board had concerns with the driveway interaction with the alley,
MUP Response: While the elevation facing the alley is very visible from for safety and visual impacts, as the driveway will not be at the grade of the MUP Response: The live work units will be highly transparent and have
California Avenue, it was treated in a different manner than the elevation alley but downgrade, creating a void which will be very much present along distinct signage that will activate the street. See page 29 with more details of
facing 42nd Ave SW. Brick is still being carried through at the base of the the alley. The Board requested details of the building treatment of the walls on the live works layouts.
building, and the massing of the upper portions is broken by the playful the east and south sides of the driveway to address the potential blank facade.
change in color and texture. There is also changes in the parapet heights to (DC1-C)
further add distinction to the masses.
MUP Response: We also acknowledge the desire for privacy and safety to
D. In response to public comment, the Board requested the applicant the neighbor to the North and provided screening from the garage ramp in
provide a more sensitive transition on the northeast corner of the building the form of an elegant wood and metal fence (setback from the property line
to address the property owners concerns of shadow impacts. The Board to increase vehicle and pedestrian visibility), that announces the driveway
suggested maximizing the open space/daylighting to the neighbor to the north from the alley and provide privacy to the resident’s yard. The East and South
to create a better relationship. (CS1-B, CS2-D) side of the driveway were carefully designed like the rest of the building,
paying attention to the break in massing through texture and color and
MUP Response: During the design process of the main elevation facing 42nd providing a fair amount of glazing so that it is not a blank facade facing the
Ave SW, and the desire to create a harmonious and symmetrical facade, a neighbor to the north but also private enough due to the distance created by
portion of the massing on the northeast and southeast of the building was the ramp.
omitted. This narrowed the actual face of this facade, and with it, created
relief and an opportunity to soften the transition to the neighbor to the north
(and south).
RAMP DOWN
BIKE PARKING
PARKING
UTILITY
GARAGE
RAMP UP
BIKE PARKING
ELECTRICAL
VAULT STORAGE
UTILITY
APPENDIX
PARKING LEVEL
AMENITY LIVE-WORK
UNIT
42ND AVE SW
UNIT
ALLEY
LOBBY/MAIL
UNIT
LIVE-WORK
LIVE-WORK
UNIT
GROUND LEVEL
UNIT UNIT
UNIT UNIT
UNIT UNIT
UNIT UNIT
UNIT UNIT
UNIT UNIT
UNIT
GREEN ROOF
(SEE LANDSCAPE)
GREEN ROOF
(SEE LANDSCAPE) MECHANICAL
UTILITY
EMR
URBAN FARM
GREEN HOUSE
ROOF DECK
GREEN ROOF
(SEE LANDSCAPE)
ROOF DECK
PL PL PL
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER
LINE LOCATIONS W/ 14'
SETBACK, CLOSEST TO
PROPERTY LINE, NE CORNER
ROOF DECK
395' - 6"
T.O. PLATE
R 14' - 0" 392' - 11"
UNITS UNITS UNITS
LEVEL 4
384' - 0"
UNITS UNITS UNITS
LEVEL 3
42ND AVENUE SW
374' - 5"
UNITS UNITS UNITS
ALLEY
LEVEL 2
364' - 10"
ADJACENT
UNITS UNITS
BUILDING
LOBBY
UPPER LEVEL 1
355' - 0"
LEVEL 1
350' - 0"
PARKING
PARKING LEVEL UPPER P1
343' - 2"
LEVEL P1
340' - 1"
PL PL
ROOF DECK
395' - 6"
T.O. PLATE
392' - 11"
UNITS UNITS UNITS
LEVEL 4
UNITS
ADJACENT SF AMENITY (GYM) OFFICE UPPER LEVEL 1
BUILDING 355' - 0"
LEVEL 1
350' - 0"
PARKING
LEVEL P1
340' - 1"
H2O APARTMENTS - LEED-H PLATINUM TARGET BROADSTONE KOI - LEED-NC CERTIFIED TARGET
OSBORN